does phylogeny predict sensitivity to ammonia in freshwater animals...
TRANSCRIPT
OreoHelix Consulting, Moab, UT
Does Phylogeny Predict Sensitivity to Ammonia in Freshwater Animals?
1
Phylum
Class
Order
Family
Genus
Species
Does Phylogeny Predict Sensitivity to Ammonia in Freshwater Animals using USEPA Ammonia Criteria Data?
Technical Memo
April 28, 2016
Vers ion 1.2
Submitted by:
David C. Richards, Ph.D.
OreoHelix Consulting
Moab, UT 84532
email: [email protected]
phone: 406.580.7816
Submitted to:
Jordan River Farmington Bay Water Quality Council
Salt Lake City, UT, USA
OreoHelix Consulting, Moab, UT
Does Phylogeny Predict Sensitivity to Ammonia in Freshwater Animals?
2
Introduction A debate is occurring between ecologists and to a lesser extent, regulators as to whether phylogeny,
functional traits, or the environmental conditions in which an organism evolved in is more predictive of
sensitivities to human caused stressors. Reliance on these unresolved relationships could have
important implications for regulators and the regulated community. EPA bases its entire Recalculation
Procedure on “The underlying premise …. that taxonomy1 has value in predicting sensitivity “(USEPA
2013a). EPA also based its entire AQUATIC LIFE AMBIENT WATER QUALITY CRITERIA FOR AMMONIA –
FRESHWATER 2013 document on this premise (USEPA 2013b). The assumption that taxonomy is
important or useful in predicting sensitivity of freshwater animals to ammonia (NH3) has not been
tested, as far as I know (but see Blomberg et al. 2003 and Losos 2008). In this brief and cursory analysis,
I statistically examine this assumption.
Statistical Analyses Sensitivities of 69 freshwater animals to NH3 (Species Mean Acute Values (mg TAN/L)) listed in Table 3.
“Ranked Genus Mean Acute Values” page 27 in USEPA (2013b) document were statistically compared.
Each species in the table was first placed into its taxonomic group from genus, family, order, class, and
phylum using the Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS; www.itis.gov) recommended by
USEPA. Simple ANOVAs were computed for each of the species toxicity values as the response variable
and the taxonomic grouping as categorical predictor variables at the phylum, class, order, and family
levels (N = 4 different ANOVAs). Genus level comparisons were not made because most genera had only
one species listed in Table 3 and useful ANOVAs could not be made. Contrasts and multiple pairwise
comparisons (Bonferroni adjusted) were then made for each of the ANOVA results . These results
included; mean contrast values, standard errors of contrasts, T test statistic, p-value of the T test
statistic, and 95% upper and lower confidence intervals of the contrast means. Finally, a percent similar
value was calculated by dividing the number of non-significant comparisons by the total number of
comparisons for each of the four taxonomic groupings. This percent similar value shows how there were
no significant differences between comparisons within a taxonomic grouping (e.g. Family) regardless of
its next higher taxonomic level. For example, the Family level percent similar value includes the family
level comparison of whether Elmidae (riffle beetles) were significantly different than Cyprinidae
(minnows) to NH3 sensitivity of for example at the Order level, the percent similar value includes
comparisons of whether Trichoptera were more similarly sensitive to NH3 than Anura (frogs).
1 EPA slightly confuses taxonomy with phylogeny. Taxonomy is defined as ‘the science or technique of classification’, whereas phylogeny is defined as ‘the development or evolution of a particular group of organisms’.
OreoHelix Consulting, Moab, UT
Does Phylogeny Predict Sensitivity to Ammonia in Freshwater Animals?
3
Results There was very little evidence of phylogenetic effects on NH3 sensitivity for any of the four taxonomic
groupings analyzed (Table 1, Appendices 1-4). If the premise that taxonomy has value in predicting
sensitivity had any validity, then it should have been most obvious at the phylum level. This was not the
case. Only two phyla level comparisons differed significantly: Chordata (animals with backbones, e.g.
fish, frogs, etc.) vs. Arthropoda (animals without backbones but with exoskeletons and segmented legs
e.g. insects, crayfish, etc.) and Mollusca (snails and bivalves) vs. Arthropoda. The other phyla level
comparisons (N = 8) were not significantly different. For example, there was no significant difference in
NH3 sensitivity found between Chordata and Annelida (segmented worms) nor between Platyhelminthes
(flatworms e.g. Planaria sp.) and Chordata. All comparisons can be found in Appendices 1-4.
Table 1. Percent similar pairwise comparisons of within taxonomic groupings to sensitivity to NH3
(based on USEPA 2013b Table 3).
Total Number of comparisons
Number of comparisons that were significantly different
Number of comparisons that were not significantly different
Percent Similar
Phylum 10 2 8 80% Class 36 7 29 81%
Order 378 36 342 90%
Family 780 25 755 97%
Discussion These analyses were not sophisticated phylogenetic distance comparisons but simple ANOVA and
pairwise comparisons. More analyses are recommended using the entire datasets found in USEPA
(2013b) document including chronic toxicity values comparisons and using more informative methods.
More importantly, these analyses did not take into consideration the extreme variability found between
species within a genus which can be orders of magnitude. These analyses also did not examine the
extreme variability (experimental error) reported by EPA between tests on the same species. For
example, in EPA (2013b) Appendix 1 “Acute Toxicity of Ammonia to Aquatic Animals”, Total Ammonia
(mgTAN/L) adjusted to pH7 and 200C values for the water flea, Ceriodaphnia dubia ranged from 35.72 to
152.9, a 4.82 times difference. This experiment- based- error- associated variability can magnify
throughout the criterion development process and potentially result in NH3 toxicity values that are very
imprecise. Given the findings of this preliminary analysis and the large variability in sensitivities, even
between tests on the same species, NH3 criteria values proposed by USEPA could be considered
unsound and should be used with skepticism by regulators.
OreoHelix Consulting, Moab, UT
Does Phylogeny Predict Sensitivity to Ammonia in Freshwater Animals?
4
Literature Cited Blomberg, S. P., Garland Jr. T, and A. R. Ives. 2003. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data:
behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57: 717-745.
Losos, J. B. 2008. Phylogenetic niche conservatism, phylogenetic signal and the relationship between
phylogenetic relatedness and ecological similarity among species. Ecology Letters 11: 995-1007.
USEPA 2013a. Revised deletion process for the site-specific recalculation procedure for aquatic life
criteria. EPA-823-R-13-001.
USEPA. 2013b. Aquatic life ambient water quality criteria for ammonia-freshwater. EPA 822-R-13-001
Appendices
Appendix 1. Phylum level comparisons of NH3 sensitivities (mg TAN/L) (from EPA 2013b, Table 3). Shaded
taxa are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Phylum Contrast Std. Error t p
95% CI
lower
95% CI
upper
1 Chordata vs Arthropoda -253.6319 46.21786 -5.49 0.00 -386.5336 -120.7303
2 Mollusca vs Arthropoda -303.4205 53.75447 -5.64 0.00 -457.994 -148.847
3 Arthropoda vs Annelida 171.8388 112.8108 1.52 1.00 -152.5541 496.2316
4 Chordata vs Annelida -81.79319 109.701 -0.75 1.00 -397.2436 233.6573
5 Mollusca vs Annelida -131.5817 113.083 -1.16 1.00 -456.7572 193.5938
6 Platyhelminthes vs Annelida -82.3 212.7181 -0.39 1.00 -693.9811 529.3811
7 Platyhelminthes vs Arthropoda -254.1388 188.0181 -1.35 1.00 -794.7936 286.5161
8 Mollusca vs Chordata -49.78855 46.87824 -1.06 1.00 -184.5892 85.01207
9 Platyhelminthes vs Chordata -0.5068084 186.1688 0 1.00 -535.844 534.8304
10 Platyhelminthes vs Mollusca 49.28174 188.1815 0.26 1.00 -491.843 590.4065
Appendix 2. Class level comparisons of NH3 sensitivities (mg TAN/L) (from EPA 2013b Table 3). Shaded taxa
are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Class Contrast Std. Error t p 95% CI lower
95% CI upper
1 Insecta vs Actinopterygii 354.7195 61.05084 5.81 0.00 153.2107 556.2284
OreoHelix Consulting, Moab, UT
Does Phylogeny Predict Sensitivity to Ammonia in Freshwater Animals?
5
2 Insecta vs Bivalvia 420.785 68.58525 6.14 0.00 194.4075 647.1625
3 Malacostraca vs Bivalvia 361.1425 73.89132 4.89 0.00 117.2515 605.0335
4 Malacostraca vs Actinopterygii 295.077 66.95667 4.41 0.001 74.075 516.0791
5 Insecta vs Amphibia 386.4875 102.8779 3.76 0.011 46.92132 726.0537
6 Insecta vs Gastropoda 358.348 95.24641 3.76 0.011 43.9708 672.7252
7 Insecta vs Branchiopoda 335.6417 89.79917 3.74 0.012 39.244 632.0393
8 Malacostraca vs Amphibia 326.845 106.4887 3.07 0.102 -24.63939 678.3294
9 Malacostraca vs Gastropoda 298.7055 99.1356 3.01 0.121 -28.50866 625.9197
10 Malacostraca vs Branchiopoda 275.9992 93.91422 2.94 0.151 -33.98093 585.9793
11 Insecta vs Clitellata 275.63 114.4719 2.41 0.652 -102.2044 653.4644
12 Amphibia vs Actinopterygii -31.76797 90.90184 -0.35 1 -331.8052 268.2692
13 Bivalvia vs Actinopterygii -66.06546 48.81827 -1.35 1 -227.1986 95.06767
14 Branchiopoda vs Actinopterygii 19.07787 75.78376 0.25 1 -231.0595 269.2152
15 Clitellata vs Actinopterygii 79.08953 103.8418 0.76 1 -263.6581 421.8372
16 Gastropoda vs Actinopterygii -3.628463 82.16547 -0.04 1 -274.8298 267.5729
17 Trepaxonemata vs Actinopterygii -3.210465 175.9058 -0.02 1 -583.8178 577.3969
18 Bivalvia vs Amphibia -34.2975 96.12427 -0.36 1 -351.5722 282.9772
19 Branchiopoda vs Amphibia 50.84583 112.249 0.45 1 -319.6512 421.3429
20 Clitellata vs Amphibia 110.8575 132.8148 0.83 1 -327.5206 549.2356
21 Gastropoda vs Amphibia 28.1395 116.6525 0.24 1 -356.8924 413.1714
22 Trepaxonemata vs Amphibia 28.5575 194.4209 0.15 1 -613.1623 670.2773
23 Branchiopoda vs Bivalvia 85.14333 81.97505 1.04 1 -185.4295 355.7161
24 Clitellata vs Bivalvia 145.155 108.4428 1.34 1 -212.7792 503.0892
25 Gastropoda vs Bivalvia 62.437 87.90845 0.71 1 -227.72 352.594
26 Trepaxonemata vs Bivalvia 62.855 178.6605 0.35 1 -526.8448 652.5548
27 Clitellata vs Branchiopoda 60.01167 122.9626 0.49 1 -345.8476 465.8709
28 Gastropoda vs Branchiopoda -22.70633 105.2989 -0.22 1 -370.2634 324.8507
29 Trepaxonemata vs Branchiopoda -22.28833 187.8284 -0.12 1 -642.2485 597.6719
30 Gastropoda vs Clitellata -82.718 126.9952 -0.65 1 -501.8876 336.4516
31 Malacostraca vs Clitellata 215.9875 117.7277 1.83 1 -172.5931 604.5681
32 Trepaxonemata vs Clitellata -82.3 200.7971 -0.41 1 -745.0653 580.4653
33 Trepaxonemata vs Gastropoda 0.4179977 190.4928 0 1 -628.3364 629.1724
34 Malacostraca vs Insecta -59.6425 82.48581 -0.72 1 -331.9011 212.6161
35 Trepaxonemata vs Insecta -357.93 182.383 -1.96 1 -959.9165 244.0565
36 Trepaxonemata vs Malacostraca -298.2875 184.4439 -1.62 1 -907.0763 310.5013
OreoHelix Consulting, Moab, UT
Does Phylogeny Predict Sensitivity to Ammonia in Freshwater Animals?
6
Appendix 3. Order level comparisons of NH3 sensitivities (mg TAN/L) (from EPA 3013b, Table 3). Shaded
taxa are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Order Contrast Std. Error t p 95% CI lower
95% CI upper
1 Trichoptera vs Anura 903.5575 164.9834 5.48 0 235.9918 1571.123
2 Trichoptera vs Cladocera 852.7117 159.3891 5.35 0 207.7819 1497.641
3 Decapoda vs Cypriniformes 556.6864 94.51766 5.89 0 174.2434 939.1294
4 Diptera vs Cypriniformes 633.1531 112.0842 5.65 0 179.6315 1086.675
5 Trichoptera vs Cypriniformes 887.2531 153.1361 5.79 0 267.6246 1506.882
6 Perciformes vs Decapoda -544.7898 93.8826 -5.8 0 -924.6631 -164.9164
7 Salmoniformes vs Decapoda -552.1763 97.13961 -5.68 0 -945.2284 -159.1243
8 Unionoida vs Decapoda -609.2127 92.4092 -6.59 0 -983.1243 -235.3012
9 Perciformes vs Diptera -621.2564 111.5492 -5.57 0 -1072.613 -169.8996
10 Salmoniformes vs Diptera -628.643 114.3039 -5.5 0 -1091.146 -166.1399
11 Unionoida vs Diptera -685.6794 110.312 -6.22 0 -1132.03 -239.3286
12 Trichoptera vs Perciformes 875.3564 152.745 5.73 0 257.3107 1493.402
13 Trichoptera vs Salmoniformes 882.743 154.7682 5.7 0 256.5109 1508.975
14 Unionoida vs Trichoptera -939.7794 151.8438 -6.19 0 -1554.179 -325.38
15 Decapoda vs Anura 572.9908 112.7051 5.08 0.001 116.9566 1029.025
16 Diptera vs Anura 649.4575 127.7956 5.08 0.001 132.3633 1166.552
17 Decapoda vs Cladocera 522.145 104.3447 5 0.002 99.93937 944.3506
18 Diptera vs Cladocera 598.6117 120.4869 4.97 0.002 111.0906 1086.133
19 Trichoptera vs Hygrophila 839.5933 170.3941 4.93 0.002 150.1344 1529.052
20 Trichoptera vs Amphipoda 799.4 170.3941 4.69 0.005 109.9411 1488.859
21 Trichoptera vs Cyprinodontiformes 847.52 180.7303 4.69 0.005 116.2384 1578.802
22 Unionoida vs Coleoptera -681.1794 151.8438 -4.49 0.01 -1295.579 -66.78001
23 Trichoptera vs Neotaenioglossa 932.35 208.6894 4.47 0.011 87.93875 1776.761
24 Trichoptera vs Sorbeocncha 925.96 208.6894 4.44 0.013 81.54875 1770.371
25 Trichoptera vs Odonata 796 180.7303 4.4 0.014 64.71841 1527.282
26 Hygrophila vs Diptera -585.4933 134.7084 -4.35 0.017 -1130.558 -40.42821
27 Verenoida vs Trichoptera -905.14 208.6894 -4.34 0.018 -1749.551 -60.72875
28 Hygrophila vs Decapoda -509.0267 120.4869 -4.22 0.027 -996.5477 -21.5056
29 Tricladida vs Trichoptera -875 208.6894 -4.19 0.03 -1719.411 -30.58875
30 Cypriniformes vs Coleoptera -628.6531 153.1361 -4.11 0.041 -1248.282 -9.024644
31 Trichoptera vs Siluriformes 852.1 208.6894 4.08 0.044 7.688756 1696.511
32 Diptera vs Amphipoda 545.3 134.7084 4.05 0.05 0.2348749 1090.365
33 Perciformes vs Coleoptera -616.7565 152.745 -4.04 0.051 -1234.802 1.289297
34 Salmoniformes vs Coleoptera -624.143 154.7682 -4.03 0.052 -1250.375 2.089119
OreoHelix Consulting, Moab, UT
Does Phylogeny Predict Sensitivity to Ammonia in Freshwater Animals?
7
35 Diptera vs Cyprinodontiformes 593.42 147.5657 4.02 0.054 -3.66893 1190.509
36 Trichoptera vs Acipenseriformes 837.8 208.6894 4.01 0.056 -6.611247 1682.211
37 Trichoptera vs Haplotaxida 824.3 208.6894 3.95 0.07 -20.11125 1668.711
38 Trichoptera vs Ephemeroptera 669.9333 170.3941 3.93 0.074 -19.52556 1359.392
39 Coleoptera vs Anura 644.9575 164.9834 3.91 0.08 -22.60818 1312.523
40 Decapoda vs Amphipoda 468.8333 120.4869 3.89 0.085 -18.68773 956.3544
41 Trichoptera vs Plecoptera 802.1 208.6894 3.84 0.1 -42.31124 1646.511
42 Decapoda vs Cyprinodontiformes 516.9533 134.7084 3.84 0.102 -28.11179 1062.018
43 Neotaenioglossa vs Diptera -678.25 180.7303 -3.75 0.135 -1409.532 53.0316
44 Coleoptera vs Cladocera 594.1117 159.3891 3.73 0.147 -50.81805 1239.041
45 Trichoptera vs Oligochaeta 778 208.6894 3.73 0.147 -66.41125 1622.411
46 Sorbeocncha vs Diptera -671.86 180.7303 -3.72 0.152 -1403.142 59.4216
47 Trichoptera vs Lumbriculida 775.8 208.6894 3.72 0.152 -68.61125 1620.211
48 Trichoptera vs Scorpaeniformes 772.3 208.6894 3.7 0.161 -72.11125 1616.711
49 Odonata vs Diptera -541.9 147.5657 -3.67 0.176 -1138.989 55.18893
50 Verenoida vs Diptera -651.04 180.7303 -3.6 0.221 -1382.322 80.2416
51 Neotaenioglossa vs Decapoda -601.7833 170.3941 -3.53 0.278 -1291.242 87.67557
52 Sorbeocncha vs Decapoda -595.3933 170.3941 -3.49 0.313 -1284.852 94.06557
53 Odonata vs Decapoda -465.4333 134.7084 -3.46 0.355 -1010.498 79.63179
54 Tricladida vs Diptera -620.9 180.7303 -3.44 0.377 -1352.182 110.3816
55 Trichoptera vs Gasterosteiformes 713 208.6894 3.42 0.401 -131.4112 1557.411
56 Hygrophila vs Coleoptera -580.9934 170.3941 -3.41 0.409 -1270.452 108.4655
57 Trichoptera vs Isopoda 611.9 180.7303 3.39 0.441 -119.3816 1343.182
58 Verenoida vs Decapoda -574.5733 170.3941 -3.37 0.461 -1264.032 114.8856
59 Siluriformes vs Diptera -598 180.7303 -3.31 0.56 -1329.282 133.2816
60 Cyprinodontiformes vs Coleoptera -588.92 180.7303 -3.26 0.654 -1320.202 142.3616
61 Diptera vs Acipenseriformes 583.7 180.7303 3.23 0.714 -147.5816 1314.982
62 Neotaenioglossa vs Coleoptera -673.75 208.6894 -3.23 0.716 -1518.161 170.6612
63 Sorbeocncha vs Coleoptera -667.36 208.6894 -3.2 0.786 -1511.771 177.0512
64 Tricladida vs Decapoda -544.4333 170.3941 -3.2 0.793 -1233.892 145.0256
65 Coleoptera vs Amphipoda 540.8 170.3941 3.17 0.845 -148.6589 1230.259
66 Haplotaxida vs Diptera -570.2 180.7303 -3.15 0.894 -1301.482 161.0816
67 Amphipoda vs Acipenseriformes 38.4 170.3941 0.23 1 -651.0589 727.8589
68 Anura vs Acipenseriformes -65.7575 164.9834 -0.4 1 -733.3232 601.8082
69 Cladocera vs Acipenseriformes -14.91166 159.3891 -0.09 1 -659.8414 630.0181
70 Coleoptera vs Acipenseriformes 579.2 208.6894 2.78 1 -265.2112 1423.611
71 Cypriniformes vs Acipenseriformes -49.45307 153.1361 -0.32 1 -669.0815 570.1754
72 Cyprinodontiformes vs Acipenseriformes -9.719994 180.7303 -0.05 1 -741.0016 721.5616
73 Decapoda vs Acipenseriformes 507.2333 170.3941 2.98 1 -182.2256 1196.692
OreoHelix Consulting, Moab, UT
Does Phylogeny Predict Sensitivity to Ammonia in Freshwater Animals?
8
74 Ephemeroptera vs Acipenseriformes 167.8667 170.3941 0.99 1 -521.5922 857.3256
75 Gasterosteiformes vs Acipenseriformes 124.8 208.6894 0.6 1 -719.6112 969.2113
76 Haplotaxida vs Acipenseriformes 13.5 208.6894 0.06 1 -830.9112 857.9112
77 Hygrophila vs Acipenseriformes -1.793327 170.3941 -0.01 1 -691.2522 687.6656
78 Isopoda vs Acipenseriformes 225.9 180.7303 1.25 1 -505.3816 957.1816
79 Lumbriculida vs Acipenseriformes 62 208.6894 0.3 1 -782.4112 906.4112
80 Neotaenioglossa vs Acipenseriformes -94.55 208.6894 -0.45 1 -938.9612 749.8613
81 Odonata vs Acipenseriformes 41.8 180.7303 0.23 1 -689.4816 773.0816
82 Oligochaeta vs Acipenseriformes 59.8 208.6894 0.29 1 -784.6112 904.2113
83 Perciformes vs Acipenseriformes -37.55643 152.745 -0.25 1 -655.6022 580.4893
84 Plecoptera vs Acipenseriformes 35.7 208.6894 0.17 1 -808.7113 880.1112
85 Salmoniformes vs Acipenseriformes -44.943 154.7682 -0.29 1 -671.1751 581.2891
86 Scorpaeniformes vs Acipenseriformes 65.5 208.6894 0.31 1 -778.9112 909.9112
87 Siluriformes vs Acipenseriformes -14.3 208.6894 -0.07 1 -858.7113 830.1112
88 Sorbeocncha vs Acipenseriformes -88.16 208.6894 -0.42 1 -932.5712 756.2513
89 Tricladida vs Acipenseriformes -37.2 208.6894 -0.18 1 -881.6112 807.2113
90 Unionoida vs Acipenseriformes -101.9794 151.8438 -0.67 1 -716.3788 512.42
91 Verenoida vs Acipenseriformes -67.34 208.6894 -0.32 1 -911.7512 777.0713
92 Anura vs Amphipoda -104.1575 112.7051 -0.92 1 -560.1917 351.8767
93 Cladocera vs Amphipoda -53.31167 104.3447 -0.51 1 -475.5173 368.894
94 Cypriniformes vs Amphipoda -87.85308 94.51766 -0.93 1 -470.2961 294.5899
95 Cyprinodontiformes vs Amphipoda -48.12 134.7084 -0.36 1 -593.1851 496.9451
96 Ephemeroptera vs Amphipoda 129.4667 120.4869 1.07 1 -358.0544 616.9877
97 Gasterosteiformes vs Amphipoda 86.4 170.3941 0.51 1 -603.0589 775.8589
98 Haplotaxida vs Amphipoda -24.9 170.3941 -0.15 1 -714.3589 664.5589
99 Hygrophila vs Amphipoda -40.19333 120.4869 -0.33 1 -527.7144 447.3277
100 Isopoda vs Amphipoda 187.5 134.7084 1.39 1 -357.5651 732.5651
101 Lumbriculida vs Amphipoda 23.6 170.3941 0.14 1 -665.8589 713.0589
102 Neotaenioglossa vs Amphipoda -132.95 170.3941 -0.78 1 -822.4089 556.5089
103 Odonata vs Amphipoda 3.399999 134.7084 0.03 1 -541.6651 548.4651
104 Oligochaeta vs Amphipoda 21.4 170.3941 0.13 1 -668.0589 710.8589
105 Perciformes vs Amphipoda -75.95643 93.8826 -0.81 1 -455.8298 303.9169
106 Plecoptera vs Amphipoda -2.700007 170.3941 -0.02 1 -692.1589 686.7589
107 Salmoniformes vs Amphipoda -83.343 97.13961 -0.86 1 -476.395 309.709
108 Scorpaeniformes vs Amphipoda 27.1 170.3941 0.16 1 -662.3589 716.5589
109 Siluriformes vs Amphipoda -52.70001 170.3941 -0.31 1 -742.1589 636.7589
110 Sorbeocncha vs Amphipoda -126.56 170.3941 -0.74 1 -816.0189 562.8989
111 Tricladida vs Amphipoda -75.6 170.3941 -0.44 1 -765.0589 613.8589
112 Unionoida vs Amphipoda -140.3794 92.4092 -1.52 1 -514.291 233.5322
OreoHelix Consulting, Moab, UT
Does Phylogeny Predict Sensitivity to Ammonia in Freshwater Animals?
9
113 Verenoida vs Amphipoda -105.74 170.3941 -0.62 1 -795.1989 583.7189
114 Cladocera vs Anura 50.84583 95.25322 0.53 1 -334.5734 436.2651
115 Cypriniformes vs Anura 16.30443 84.37389 0.19 1 -325.0942 357.7031
116 Cyprinodontiformes vs Anura 56.0375 127.7956 0.44 1 -461.0567 573.1317
117 Ephemeroptera vs Anura 233.6242 112.7051 2.07 1 -222.41 689.6584
118 Gasterosteiformes vs Anura 190.5575 164.9834 1.16 1 -477.0082 858.1232
119 Haplotaxida vs Anura 79.2575 164.9834 0.48 1 -588.3082 746.8232
120 Hygrophila vs Anura 63.96417 112.7051 0.57 1 -392.07 519.9984
121 Isopoda vs Anura 291.6575 127.7956 2.28 1 -225.4367 808.7517
122 Lumbriculida vs Anura 127.7575 164.9834 0.77 1 -539.8082 795.3232
123 Neotaenioglossa vs Anura -28.7925 164.9834 -0.17 1 -696.3582 638.7732
124 Odonata vs Anura 107.5575 127.7956 0.84 1 -409.5367 624.6517
125 Oligochaeta vs Anura 125.5575 164.9834 0.76 1 -542.0082 793.1232
126 Perciformes vs Anura 28.20107 83.66186 0.34 1 -310.3165 366.7187
127 Plecoptera vs Anura 101.4575 164.9834 0.61 1 -566.1082 769.0232
128 Salmoniformes vs Anura 20.8145 87.30102 0.24 1 -332.4281 374.0571
129 Scorpaeniformes vs Anura 131.2575 164.9834 0.8 1 -536.3082 798.8232
130 Siluriformes vs Anura 51.45749 164.9834 0.31 1 -616.1082 719.0232
131 Sorbeocncha vs Anura -22.4025 164.9834 -0.14 1 -689.9682 645.1632
132 Tricladida vs Anura 28.5575 164.9834 0.17 1 -639.0082 696.1232
133 Unionoida vs Anura -36.22191 82.00503 -0.44 1 -368.0355 295.5917
134 Verenoida vs Anura -1.582499 164.9834 -0.01 1 -669.1482 665.9832
135 Cypriniformes vs Cladocera -34.54141 72.83075 -0.47 1 -329.2335 260.1507
136 Cyprinodontiformes vs Cladocera 5.191671 120.4869 0.04 1 -482.3294 492.7127
137 Ephemeroptera vs Cladocera 182.7783 104.3447 1.75 1 -239.4273 604.984
138 Gasterosteiformes vs Cladocera 139.7117 159.3891 0.88 1 -505.2181 784.6414
139 Haplotaxida vs Cladocera 28.41166 159.3891 0.18 1 -616.5181 673.3414
140 Hygrophila vs Cladocera 13.11834 104.3447 0.13 1 -409.0873 435.324
141 Isopoda vs Cladocera 240.8117 120.4869 2 1 -246.7094 728.3327
142 Lumbriculida vs Cladocera 76.91166 159.3891 0.48 1 -568.0181 721.8414
143 Neotaenioglossa vs Cladocera -79.63833 159.3891 -0.5 1 -724.5681 565.2914
144 Odonata vs Cladocera 56.71167 120.4869 0.47 1 -430.8094 544.2327
145 Oligochaeta vs Cladocera 74.71167 159.3891 0.47 1 -570.2181 719.6414
146 Perciformes vs Cladocera -22.64476 72.00467 -0.31 1 -313.9943 268.7048
147 Plecoptera vs Cladocera 50.61166 159.3891 0.32 1 -594.3181 695.5414
148 Salmoniformes vs Cladocera -30.03133 76.20258 -0.39 1 -338.3667 278.3041
149 Scorpaeniformes vs Cladocera 80.41166 159.3891 0.5 1 -564.5181 725.3414
150 Siluriformes vs Cladocera 0.6116613 159.3891 0 1 -644.3181 645.5414
151 Sorbeocncha vs Cladocera -73.24833 159.3891 -0.46 1 -718.1781 571.6814
OreoHelix Consulting, Moab, UT
Does Phylogeny Predict Sensitivity to Ammonia in Freshwater Animals?
10
152 Tricladida vs Cladocera -22.28833 159.3891 -0.14 1 -667.2181 622.6414
153 Unionoida vs Cladocera -87.06774 70.07274 -1.24 1 -370.6002 196.4648
154 Verenoida vs Cladocera -52.42833 159.3891 -0.33 1 -697.3581 592.5014
155 Decapoda vs Coleoptera -71.9667 170.3941 -0.42 1 -761.4256 617.4922
156 Diptera vs Coleoptera 4.499969 180.7303 0.02 1 -726.7816 735.7816
157 Ephemeroptera vs Coleoptera -411.3334 170.3941 -2.41 1 -1100.792 278.1255
158 Gasterosteiformes vs Coleoptera -454.4 208.6894 -2.18 1 -1298.811 390.0112
159 Haplotaxida vs Coleoptera -565.7 208.6894 -2.71 1 -1410.111 278.7112
160 Isopoda vs Coleoptera -353.3 180.7303 -1.95 1 -1084.582 377.9816
161 Lumbriculida vs Coleoptera -517.2 208.6894 -2.48 1 -1361.611 327.2112
162 Odonata vs Coleoptera -537.4 180.7303 -2.97 1 -1268.682 193.8816
163 Oligochaeta vs Coleoptera -519.4 208.6894 -2.49 1 -1363.811 325.0112
164 Plecoptera vs Coleoptera -543.5 208.6894 -2.6 1 -1387.911 300.9112
165 Scorpaeniformes vs Coleoptera -513.7 208.6894 -2.46 1 -1358.111 330.7112
166 Siluriformes vs Coleoptera -593.5 208.6894 -2.84 1 -1437.911 250.9112
167 Trichoptera vs Coleoptera 258.6 208.6894 1.24 1 -585.8113 1103.011
168 Tricladida vs Coleoptera -616.4 208.6894 -2.95 1 -1460.811 228.0112
169 Verenoida vs Coleoptera -646.54 208.6894 -3.1 1 -1490.951 197.8712
170 Cyprinodontiformes vs Cypriniformes 39.73308 112.0842 0.35 1 -413.7885 493.2547
171 Ephemeroptera vs Cypriniformes 217.3197 94.51766 2.3 1 -165.1232 599.7627
172 Gasterosteiformes vs Cypriniformes 174.2531 153.1361 1.14 1 -445.3754 793.8815
173 Haplotaxida vs Cypriniformes 62.95307 153.1361 0.41 1 -556.6754 682.5815
174 Hygrophila vs Cypriniformes 47.65975 94.51766 0.5 1 -334.7832 430.1027
175 Isopoda vs Cypriniformes 275.3531 112.0842 2.46 1 -178.1685 728.8747
176 Lumbriculida vs Cypriniformes 111.4531 153.1361 0.73 1 -508.1754 731.0815
177 Neotaenioglossa vs Cypriniformes -45.09692 153.1361 -0.29 1 -664.7254 574.5315
178 Odonata vs Cypriniformes 91.25308 112.0842 0.81 1 -362.2685 544.7747
179 Oligochaeta vs Cypriniformes 109.2531 153.1361 0.71 1 -510.3754 728.8815
180 Perciformes vs Cypriniformes 11.89665 56.83704 0.21 1 -218.0808 241.8741
181 Plecoptera vs Cypriniformes 85.15307 153.1361 0.56 1 -534.4754 704.7815
182 Salmoniformes vs Cypriniformes 4.510076 62.0694 0.07 1 -246.6388 255.659
183 Scorpaeniformes vs Cypriniformes 114.9531 153.1361 0.75 1 -504.6754 734.5815
184 Siluriformes vs Cypriniformes 35.15307 153.1361 0.23 1 -584.4754 654.7815
185 Sorbeocncha vs Cypriniformes -38.70692 153.1361 -0.25 1 -658.3354 580.9215
186 Tricladida vs Cypriniformes 12.25308 153.1361 0.08 1 -607.3754 631.8815
187 Unionoida vs Cypriniformes -52.52634 54.3688 -0.97 1 -272.5166 167.4639
188 Verenoida vs Cypriniformes -17.88692 153.1361 -0.12 1 -637.5154 601.7415
189 Ephemeroptera vs Cyprinodontiformes 177.5867 134.7084 1.32 1 -367.4785 722.6518
190 Gasterosteiformes vs Cyprinodontiformes 134.52 180.7303 0.74 1 -596.7616 865.8016
OreoHelix Consulting, Moab, UT
Does Phylogeny Predict Sensitivity to Ammonia in Freshwater Animals?
11
191 Haplotaxida vs Cyprinodontiformes 23.21999 180.7303 0.13 1 -708.0616 754.5016
192 Hygrophila vs Cyprinodontiformes 7.926666 134.7084 0.06 1 -537.1385 552.9918
193 Isopoda vs Cyprinodontiformes 235.62 147.5657 1.6 1 -361.4689 832.7089
194 Lumbriculida vs Cyprinodontiformes 71.71999 180.7303 0.4 1 -659.5616 803.0016
195 Neotaenioglossa vs Cyprinodontiformes -84.83 180.7303 -0.47 1 -816.1116 646.4516
196 Odonata vs Cyprinodontiformes 51.52 147.5657 0.35 1 -545.5689 648.6089
197 Oligochaeta vs Cyprinodontiformes 69.52 180.7303 0.38 1 -661.7616 800.8016
198 Perciformes vs Cyprinodontiformes -27.83643 111.5492 -0.25 1 -479.1932 423.5204
199 Plecoptera vs Cyprinodontiformes 45.41999 180.7303 0.25 1 -685.8616 776.7016
200 Salmoniformes vs Cyprinodontiformes -35.223 114.3039 -0.31 1 -497.7261 427.2801
201 Scorpaeniformes vs Cyprinodontiformes 75.21999 180.7303 0.42 1 -656.0616 806.5016
202 Siluriformes vs Cyprinodontiformes -4.580009 180.7303 -0.03 1 -735.8616 726.7016
203 Sorbeocncha vs Cyprinodontiformes -78.44 180.7303 -0.43 1 -809.7216 652.8416
204 Tricladida vs Cyprinodontiformes -27.48 180.7303 -0.15 1 -758.7616 703.8016
205 Unionoida vs Cyprinodontiformes -92.25941 110.312 -0.84 1 -538.6103 354.0914
206 Verenoida vs Cyprinodontiformes -57.62 180.7303 -0.32 1 -788.9016 673.6616
207 Diptera vs Decapoda 76.46666 134.7084 0.57 1 -468.5985 621.5318
208 Ephemeroptera vs Decapoda -339.3667 120.4869 -2.82 1 -826.8877 148.1544
209 Gasterosteiformes vs Decapoda -382.4333 170.3941 -2.24 1 -1071.892 307.0256
210 Haplotaxida vs Decapoda -493.7333 170.3941 -2.9 1 -1183.192 195.7256
211 Isopoda vs Decapoda -281.3333 134.7084 -2.09 1 -826.3984 263.7318
212 Lumbriculida vs Decapoda -445.2333 170.3941 -2.61 1 -1134.692 244.2256
213 Oligochaeta vs Decapoda -447.4333 170.3941 -2.63 1 -1136.892 242.0256
214 Plecoptera vs Decapoda -471.5333 170.3941 -2.77 1 -1160.992 217.9256
215 Scorpaeniformes vs Decapoda -441.7333 170.3941 -2.59 1 -1131.192 247.7256
216 Siluriformes vs Decapoda -521.5333 170.3941 -3.06 1 -1210.992 167.9256
217 Trichoptera vs Decapoda 330.5667 170.3941 1.94 1 -358.8922 1020.026
218 Ephemeroptera vs Diptera -415.8333 134.7084 -3.09 1 -960.8984 129.2318
219 Gasterosteiformes vs Diptera -458.9 180.7303 -2.54 1 -1190.182 272.3816
220 Isopoda vs Diptera -357.8 147.5657 -2.42 1 -954.8889 239.2889
221 Lumbriculida vs Diptera -521.7 180.7303 -2.89 1 -1252.982 209.5816
222 Oligochaeta vs Diptera -523.9 180.7303 -2.9 1 -1255.182 207.3816
223 Plecoptera vs Diptera -548 180.7303 -3.03 1 -1279.282 183.2816
224 Scorpaeniformes vs Diptera -518.2 180.7303 -2.87 1 -1249.482 213.0816
225 Trichoptera vs Diptera 254.1 180.7303 1.41 1 -477.1816 985.3816
226 Gasterosteiformes vs Ephemeroptera -43.06667 170.3941 -0.25 1 -732.5256 646.3922
227 Haplotaxida vs Ephemeroptera -154.3667 170.3941 -0.91 1 -843.8256 535.0922
228 Hygrophila vs Ephemeroptera -169.66 120.4869 -1.41 1 -657.1811 317.8611
229 Isopoda vs Ephemeroptera 58.03334 134.7084 0.43 1 -487.0318 603.0985
OreoHelix Consulting, Moab, UT
Does Phylogeny Predict Sensitivity to Ammonia in Freshwater Animals?
12
230 Lumbriculida vs Ephemeroptera -105.8667 170.3941 -0.62 1 -795.3256 583.5922
231 Neotaenioglossa vs Ephemeroptera -262.4167 170.3941 -1.54 1 -951.8756 427.0422
232 Odonata vs Ephemeroptera -126.0667 134.7084 -0.94 1 -671.1318 418.9985
233 Oligochaeta vs Ephemeroptera -108.0667 170.3941 -0.63 1 -797.5256 581.3922
234 Perciformes vs Ephemeroptera -205.4231 93.8826 -2.19 1 -585.2964 174.4503
235 Plecoptera vs Ephemeroptera -132.1667 170.3941 -0.78 1 -821.6256 557.2922
236 Salmoniformes vs Ephemeroptera -212.8097 97.13961 -2.19 1 -605.8617 180.2424
237 Scorpaeniformes vs Ephemeroptera -102.3667 170.3941 -0.6 1 -791.8256 587.0922
238 Siluriformes vs Ephemeroptera -182.1667 170.3941 -1.07 1 -871.6256 507.2922
239 Sorbeocncha vs Ephemeroptera -256.0267 170.3941 -1.5 1 -945.4856 433.4322
240 Tricladida vs Ephemeroptera -205.0667 170.3941 -1.2 1 -894.5256 484.3922
241 Unionoida vs Ephemeroptera -269.8461 92.4092 -2.92 1 -643.7577 104.0655
242 Verenoida vs Ephemeroptera -235.2067 170.3941 -1.38 1 -924.6656 454.2522
243 Haplotaxida vs Gasterosteiformes -111.3 208.6894 -0.53 1 -955.7113 733.1112
244 Hygrophila vs Gasterosteiformes -126.5933 170.3941 -0.74 1 -816.0522 562.8656
245 Isopoda vs Gasterosteiformes 101.1 180.7303 0.56 1 -630.1816 832.3816
246 Lumbriculida vs Gasterosteiformes -62.8 208.6894 -0.3 1 -907.2113 781.6112
247 Neotaenioglossa vs Gasterosteiformes -219.35 208.6894 -1.05 1 -1063.761 625.0613
248 Odonata vs Gasterosteiformes -83 180.7303 -0.46 1 -814.2816 648.2816
249 Oligochaeta vs Gasterosteiformes -65 208.6894 -0.31 1 -909.4112 779.4112
250 Perciformes vs Gasterosteiformes -162.3564 152.745 -1.06 1 -780.4022 455.6893
251 Plecoptera vs Gasterosteiformes -89.10001 208.6894 -0.43 1 -933.5113 755.3112
252 Salmoniformes vs Gasterosteiformes -169.743 154.7682 -1.1 1 -795.9751 456.4891
253 Scorpaeniformes vs Gasterosteiformes -59.3 208.6894 -0.28 1 -903.7113 785.1112
254 Siluriformes vs Gasterosteiformes -139.1 208.6894 -0.67 1 -983.5113 705.3112
255 Sorbeocncha vs Gasterosteiformes -212.96 208.6894 -1.02 1 -1057.371 631.4513
256 Tricladida vs Gasterosteiformes -162 208.6894 -0.78 1 -1006.411 682.4112
257 Unionoida vs Gasterosteiformes -226.7794 151.8438 -1.49 1 -841.1788 387.62
258 Verenoida vs Gasterosteiformes -192.14 208.6894 -0.92 1 -1036.551 652.2713
259 Hygrophila vs Haplotaxida -15.29333 170.3941 -0.09 1 -704.7522 674.1656
260 Isopoda vs Haplotaxida 212.4 180.7303 1.18 1 -518.8816 943.6816
261 Lumbriculida vs Haplotaxida 48.5 208.6894 0.23 1 -795.9112 892.9112
262 Neotaenioglossa vs Haplotaxida -108.05 208.6894 -0.52 1 -952.4612 736.3613
263 Odonata vs Haplotaxida 28.3 180.7303 0.16 1 -702.9816 759.5816
264 Oligochaeta vs Haplotaxida 46.3 208.6894 0.22 1 -798.1112 890.7113
265 Perciformes vs Haplotaxida -51.05643 152.745 -0.33 1 -669.1022 566.9893
266 Plecoptera vs Haplotaxida 22.2 208.6894 0.11 1 -822.2113 866.6112
267 Salmoniformes vs Haplotaxida -58.443 154.7682 -0.38 1 -684.6751 567.7891
268 Scorpaeniformes vs Haplotaxida 52 208.6894 0.25 1 -792.4112 896.4112
OreoHelix Consulting, Moab, UT
Does Phylogeny Predict Sensitivity to Ammonia in Freshwater Animals?
13
269 Siluriformes vs Haplotaxida -27.8 208.6894 -0.13 1 -872.2113 816.6112
270 Sorbeocncha vs Haplotaxida -101.66 208.6894 -0.49 1 -946.0712 742.7513
271 Tricladida vs Haplotaxida -50.7 208.6894 -0.24 1 -895.1112 793.7113
272 Unionoida vs Haplotaxida -115.4794 151.8438 -0.76 1 -729.8788 498.92
273 Verenoida vs Haplotaxida -80.84 208.6894 -0.39 1 -925.2512 763.5713
274 Isopoda vs Hygrophila 227.6933 134.7084 1.69 1 -317.3718 772.7585
275 Lumbriculida vs Hygrophila 63.79333 170.3941 0.37 1 -625.6656 753.2522
276 Neotaenioglossa vs Hygrophila -92.75667 170.3941 -0.54 1 -782.2156 596.7022
277 Odonata vs Hygrophila 43.59333 134.7084 0.32 1 -501.4718 588.6584
278 Oligochaeta vs Hygrophila 61.59333 170.3941 0.36 1 -627.8656 751.0522
279 Perciformes vs Hygrophila -35.7631 93.8826 -0.38 1 -415.6365 344.1103
280 Plecoptera vs Hygrophila 37.49332 170.3941 0.22 1 -651.9656 726.9522
281 Salmoniformes vs Hygrophila -43.14967 97.13961 -0.44 1 -436.2017 349.9024
282 Scorpaeniformes vs Hygrophila 67.29333 170.3941 0.39 1 -622.1656 756.7522
283 Siluriformes vs Hygrophila -12.50668 170.3941 -0.07 1 -701.9656 676.9522
284 Sorbeocncha vs Hygrophila -86.36667 170.3941 -0.51 1 -775.8256 603.0922
285 Tricladida vs Hygrophila -35.40667 170.3941 -0.21 1 -724.8656 654.0522
286 Unionoida vs Hygrophila -100.1861 92.4092 -1.08 1 -474.0977 273.7255
287 Verenoida vs Hygrophila -65.54667 170.3941 -0.38 1 -755.0056 623.9122
288 Lumbriculida vs Isopoda -163.9 180.7303 -0.91 1 -895.1816 567.3816
289 Neotaenioglossa vs Isopoda -320.45 180.7303 -1.77 1 -1051.732 410.8316
290 Odonata vs Isopoda -184.1 147.5657 -1.25 1 -781.1889 412.9889
291 Oligochaeta vs Isopoda -166.1 180.7303 -0.92 1 -897.3816 565.1816
292 Perciformes vs Isopoda -263.4564 111.5492 -2.36 1 -714.8132 187.9004
293 Plecoptera vs Isopoda -190.2 180.7303 -1.05 1 -921.4816 541.0816
294 Salmoniformes vs Isopoda -270.843 114.3039 -2.37 1 -733.3461 191.6601
295 Scorpaeniformes vs Isopoda -160.4 180.7303 -0.89 1 -891.6816 570.8816
296 Siluriformes vs Isopoda -240.2 180.7303 -1.33 1 -971.4816 491.0816
297 Sorbeocncha vs Isopoda -314.06 180.7303 -1.74 1 -1045.342 417.2216
298 Tricladida vs Isopoda -263.1 180.7303 -1.46 1 -994.3816 468.1816
299 Unionoida vs Isopoda -327.8794 110.312 -2.97 1 -774.2303 118.4714
300 Verenoida vs Isopoda -293.24 180.7303 -1.62 1 -1024.522 438.0416
301 Neotaenioglossa vs Lumbriculida -156.55 208.6894 -0.75 1 -1000.961 687.8613
302 Odonata vs Lumbriculida -20.2 180.7303 -0.11 1 -751.4816 711.0816
303 Oligochaeta vs Lumbriculida -2.199997 208.6894 -0.01 1 -846.6112 842.2113
304 Perciformes vs Lumbriculida -99.55643 152.745 -0.65 1 -717.6022 518.4893
305 Plecoptera vs Lumbriculida -26.3 208.6894 -0.13 1 -870.7113 818.1112
306 Salmoniformes vs Lumbriculida -106.943 154.7682 -0.69 1 -733.1751 519.2891
307 Scorpaeniformes vs Lumbriculida 3.5 208.6894 0.02 1 -840.9112 847.9112
OreoHelix Consulting, Moab, UT
Does Phylogeny Predict Sensitivity to Ammonia in Freshwater Animals?
14
308 Siluriformes vs Lumbriculida -76.3 208.6894 -0.37 1 -920.7113 768.1112
309 Sorbeocncha vs Lumbriculida -150.16 208.6894 -0.72 1 -994.5712 694.2513
310 Tricladida vs Lumbriculida -99.2 208.6894 -0.48 1 -943.6112 745.2113
311 Unionoida vs Lumbriculida -163.9794 151.8438 -1.08 1 -778.3788 450.42
312 Verenoida vs Lumbriculida -129.34 208.6894 -0.62 1 -973.7512 715.0713
313 Odonata vs Neotaenioglossa 136.35 180.7303 0.75 1 -594.9316 867.6316
314 Oligochaeta vs Neotaenioglossa 154.35 208.6894 0.74 1 -690.0613 998.7612
315 Perciformes vs Neotaenioglossa 56.99357 152.745 0.37 1 -561.0522 675.0393
316 Plecoptera vs Neotaenioglossa 130.25 208.6894 0.62 1 -714.1613 974.6612
317 Salmoniformes vs Neotaenioglossa 49.607 154.7682 0.32 1 -576.6251 675.8391
318 Scorpaeniformes vs Neotaenioglossa 160.05 208.6894 0.77 1 -684.3613 1004.461
319 Siluriformes vs Neotaenioglossa 80.24999 208.6894 0.38 1 -764.1613 924.6612
320 Sorbeocncha vs Neotaenioglossa 6.389999 208.6894 0.03 1 -838.0213 850.8012
321 Tricladida vs Neotaenioglossa 57.35 208.6894 0.27 1 -787.0613 901.7612
322 Unionoida vs Neotaenioglossa -7.429413 151.8438 -0.05 1 -621.8288 606.97
323 Verenoida vs Neotaenioglossa 27.21 208.6894 0.13 1 -817.2013 871.6212
324 Oligochaeta vs Odonata 18 180.7303 0.1 1 -713.2816 749.2816
325 Perciformes vs Odonata -79.35643 111.5492 -0.71 1 -530.7132 372.0004
326 Plecoptera vs Odonata -6.100006 180.7303 -0.03 1 -737.3816 725.1816
327 Salmoniformes vs Odonata -86.743 114.3039 -0.76 1 -549.2461 375.7601
328 Scorpaeniformes vs Odonata 23.7 180.7303 0.13 1 -707.5816 754.9816
329 Siluriformes vs Odonata -56.10001 180.7303 -0.31 1 -787.3816 675.1816
330 Sorbeocncha vs Odonata -129.96 180.7303 -0.72 1 -861.2416 601.3216
331 Tricladida vs Odonata -79 180.7303 -0.44 1 -810.2816 652.2816
332 Unionoida vs Odonata -143.7794 110.312 -1.3 1 -590.1302 302.5714
333 Verenoida vs Odonata -109.14 180.7303 -0.6 1 -840.4216 622.1416
334 Perciformes vs Oligochaeta -97.35643 152.745 -0.64 1 -715.4022 520.6893
335 Plecoptera vs Oligochaeta -24.10001 208.6894 -0.12 1 -868.5113 820.3112
336 Salmoniformes vs Oligochaeta -104.743 154.7682 -0.68 1 -730.9751 521.4891
337 Scorpaeniformes vs Oligochaeta 5.699997 208.6894 0.03 1 -838.7113 850.1112
338 Siluriformes vs Oligochaeta -74.10001 208.6894 -0.36 1 -918.5113 770.3112
339 Sorbeocncha vs Oligochaeta -147.96 208.6894 -0.71 1 -992.3712 696.4513
340 Tricladida vs Oligochaeta -97 208.6894 -0.46 1 -941.4112 747.4112
341 Unionoida vs Oligochaeta -161.7794 151.8438 -1.07 1 -776.1788 452.62
342 Verenoida vs Oligochaeta -127.14 208.6894 -0.61 1 -971.5512 717.2713
343 Plecoptera vs Perciformes 73.25642 152.745 0.48 1 -544.7893 691.3022
344 Salmoniformes vs Perciformes -7.386571 61.09799 -0.12 1 -254.6049 239.8317
345 Scorpaeniformes vs Perciformes 103.0564 152.745 0.67 1 -514.9893 721.1022
346 Siluriformes vs Perciformes 23.25642 152.745 0.15 1 -594.7893 641.3022
OreoHelix Consulting, Moab, UT
Does Phylogeny Predict Sensitivity to Ammonia in Freshwater Animals?
15
347 Sorbeocncha vs Perciformes -50.60357 152.745 -0.33 1 -668.6493 567.4422
348 Tricladida vs Perciformes 0.3564292 152.745 0 1 -617.6893 618.4022
349 Unionoida vs Perciformes -64.42298 53.25712 -1.21 1 -279.9151 151.0691
350 Verenoida vs Perciformes -29.78357 152.745 -0.19 1 -647.8293 588.2622
351 Salmoniformes vs Plecoptera -80.64299 154.7682 -0.52 1 -706.8751 545.5891
352 Scorpaeniformes vs Plecoptera 29.8 208.6894 0.14 1 -814.6112 874.2113
353 Siluriformes vs Plecoptera -50 208.6894 -0.24 1 -894.4112 794.4112
354 Sorbeocncha vs Plecoptera -123.86 208.6894 -0.59 1 -968.2712 720.5513
355 Tricladida vs Plecoptera -72.89999 208.6894 -0.35 1 -917.3112 771.5113
356 Unionoida vs Plecoptera -137.6794 151.8438 -0.91 1 -752.0788 476.72
357 Verenoida vs Plecoptera -103.04 208.6894 -0.49 1 -947.4512 741.3713
358 Scorpaeniformes vs Salmoniformes 110.443 154.7682 0.71 1 -515.7891 736.6751
359 Siluriformes vs Salmoniformes 30.64299 154.7682 0.2 1 -595.5891 656.8751
360 Sorbeocncha vs Salmoniformes -43.217 154.7682 -0.28 1 -669.4491 583.0151
361 Tricladida vs Salmoniformes 7.743 154.7682 0.05 1 -618.4891 633.9751
362 Unionoida vs Salmoniformes -57.03641 58.80885 -0.97 1 -294.9923 180.9195
363 Verenoida vs Salmoniformes -22.397 154.7682 -0.14 1 -648.6291 603.8351
364 Siluriformes vs Scorpaeniformes -79.8 208.6894 -0.38 1 -924.2113 764.6112
365 Sorbeocncha vs Scorpaeniformes -153.66 208.6894 -0.74 1 -998.0712 690.7513
366 Tricladida vs Scorpaeniformes -102.7 208.6894 -0.49 1 -947.1112 741.7113
367 Unionoida vs Scorpaeniformes -167.4794 151.8438 -1.1 1 -781.8788 446.92
368 Verenoida vs Scorpaeniformes -132.84 208.6894 -0.64 1 -977.2512 711.5713
369 Sorbeocncha vs Siluriformes -73.85999 208.6894 -0.35 1 -918.2712 770.5513
370 Tricladida vs Siluriformes -22.89999 208.6894 -0.11 1 -867.3112 821.5113
371 Unionoida vs Siluriformes -87.67941 151.8438 -0.58 1 -702.0788 526.72
372 Verenoida vs Siluriformes -53.03999 208.6894 -0.25 1 -897.4512 791.3713
373 Tricladida vs Sorbeocncha 50.96 208.6894 0.24 1 -793.4513 895.3712
374 Unionoida vs Sorbeocncha -13.81941 151.8438 -0.09 1 -628.2188 600.58
375 Verenoida vs Sorbeocncha 20.82 208.6894 0.1 1 -823.5913 865.2312
376 Unionoida vs Tricladida -64.77941 151.8438 -0.43 1 -679.1788 549.62
377 Verenoida vs Tricladida -30.14 208.6894 -0.14 1 -874.5512 814.2713
378 Verenoida vs Unionoida 34.63941 151.8438 0.23 1 -579.76 649.0388
Appendix 4. Family level comparisons of NH3 sensitivities (mg TAN/L)(from EPA 2013b Table 3). Shaded taxa
are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Family Contrast Std. Error t p 95% CI 95% CI
OreoHelix Consulting, Moab, UT
Does Phylogeny Predict Sensitivity to Ammonia in Freshwater Animals?
16
lower upper
Unionidae vs Cambaridae -609.2127 100.006 -6.09 0 -1040.203 -178.2228
Unionidae vs Chironomidae -685.6794 119.3805 -5.74 0 -1200.167 -171.1922
Unionidae vs Limnephilidae -939.7794 164.3266 -5.72 0 -1647.968 -231.5907
Cyprinidae vs Cambaridae -555.6522 106.4645 -5.22 0.002 -1014.476 -96.82841
Sa lmonidae vs Cambaridae -552.1763 105.1252 -5.25 0.002 -1005.229 -99.12412
Limnephilidae vs Centrarchidae 890.505 172.4922 5.16 0.002 147.1255 1633.885
Limnephilidae vs Cyprinidae 886.2189 168.3351 5.26 0.002 160.7547 1611.683
Sa lmonidae vs Limnephilidae -882.743 167.4913 -5.27 0.002 -1604.571 -160.9153
Cyprinidae vs Chironomidae -632.1189 124.8407 -5.06 0.003 -1170.137 -94.10027
Sa lmonidae vs Chironomidae -628.643 123.7005 -5.08 0.003 -1161.748 -95.5379
Centrarchidae vs Cambaridae -559.9383 112.9226 -4.96 0.005 -1046.594 -73.28219
Limnephilidae vs Catostomidae 889.58 178.5463 4.98 0.005 120.1091 1659.051
Limnephilidae vs Daphnidae 856.874 174.939 4.9 0.006 102.9495 1610.798
Percidae vs Limnephilidae -905.9267 184.4019 -4.91 0.006 -1700.633 -111.2205
Chironomidae vs Centrarchidae 636.405 130.3918 4.88 0.007 74.46288 1198.347
Moronidae vs Limnephilidae -846.22 178.5463 -4.74 0.011 -1615.691 -76.74908
Limnephilidae vs Hyl idae 922.055 195.5877 4.71 0.012 79.14184 1764.968
Catostomidae vs Cambaridae -559.0133 121.9704 -4.58 0.019 -1084.662 -33.36462
Chironomidae vs Catostomidae 635.48 138.3014 4.59 0.019 39.45038 1231.51
Daphnidae vs Cambaridae -526.3073 116.626 -4.51 0.025 -1028.924 -23.69103
Daphnidae vs Chironomidae -602.774 133.6118 -4.51 0.025 -1178.593 -26.95468
Percidae vs Chironomidae -651.8267 145.7825 -4.47 0.029 -1280.097 -23.55629
Percidae vs Cambaridae -575.36 130.3918 -4.41 0.035 -1137.302 -13.41789
Poeci liidae vs Limnephilidae -847.52 195.5877 -4.33 0.046 -1690.433 -4.606834
Moronidae vs Chironomidae -592.12 138.3014 -4.28 0.055 -1188.15 3.909618
Moronidae vs Cambaridae -515.6533 121.9704 -4.23 0.066 -1041.302 9.99538
Hyl idae vs Chironomidae -667.955 159.6967 -4.18 0.077 -1356.191 20.28072
Unionidae vs Elmidae -681.1794 164.3266 -4.15 0.087 -1389.368 27.00927
Limnephilidae vs Hydrobiidae 932.35 225.8452 4.13 0.092 -40.96228 1905.662
Pleuroceridae vs Limnephilidae -925.96 225.8452 -4.1 0.102 -1899.272 47.35228
Limnephilidae vs Crangonyctidae 798.15 195.5877 4.08 0.108 -44.76316 1641.063
Hyl idae vs Cambaridae -591.4883 145.7825 -4.06 0.117 -1219.759 36.78205
Lymnaeidae vs Limnephilidae -905.88 225.8452 -4.01 0.137 -1879.192 67.43229
Sphaeriidae vs Limnephilidae -905.14 225.8452 -4.01 0.138 -1878.452 68.17228
Ranidae vs Limnephilidae -898.12 225.8452 -3.98 0.153 -1871.432 75.19228
Limnephilidae vs Dendrocoelidae 875 225.8452 3.87 0.214 -98.31228 1848.312
Pipidae vs Limnephilidae -872 225.8452 -3.86 0.224 -1845.312 101.3123
Limnephilidae vs Ictaluridae 852.1 225.8452 3.77 0.297 -121.2123 1825.412
OreoHelix Consulting, Moab, UT
Does Phylogeny Predict Sensitivity to Ammonia in Freshwater Animals?
17
Elmidae vs Cyprinidae 627.6189 168.3351 3.73 0.343 -97.84523 1353.083
Limnephilidae vs Baetidae 728.85 195.5877 3.73 0.345 -114.0632 1571.763
Sa lmonidae vs Elmidae -624.143 167.4913 -3.73 0.345 -1345.971 97.68468
Poeci liidae vs Chironomidae -593.42 159.6967 -3.72 0.357 -1281.656 94.81572
Limnephilidae vs Acipenseridae 837.8 225.8452 3.71 0.364 -135.5123 1811.112
Limnephilidae vs Chydoridae 831.9 225.8452 3.68 0.396 -141.4123 1805.212
Limnephilidae vs Coenagrionidae 830.5 225.8452 3.68 0.403 -142.8123 1803.812
Phys idae vs Limnephilidae -830 225.8452 -3.68 0.406 -1803.312 143.3123
Elmidae vs Centrarchidae 631.905 172.4922 3.66 0.422 -111.4745 1375.285
Tubi ficidae vs Limnephilidae -824.3 225.8452 -3.65 0.44 -1797.612 149.0123
Limnephilidae vs Cichlidae 809.3 225.8452 3.58 0.542 -164.0123 1782.612
Perlodidae vs Limnephilidae -802.1 225.8452 -3.55 0.599 -1775.412 171.2123
Limnephilidae vs Hyalellidae 801.9 225.8452 3.55 0.601 -171.4123 1775.212
Poeci liidae vs Cambaridae -516.9533 145.7825 -3.55 0.609 -1145.224 111.3171
Elmidae vs Catostomidae 630.98 178.5463 3.53 0.633 -138.4909 1400.451
Percidae vs Elmidae -647.3267 184.4019 -3.51 0.681 -1442.033 147.3795
Hydrobi idae vs Chironomidae -678.25 195.5877 -3.47 0.777 -1521.163 164.6632
Planorbidae vs Limnephilidae -782.9 225.8452 -3.47 0.78 -1756.212 190.4123
Naididae vs Limnephilidae -778 225.8452 -3.44 0.833 -1751.312 195.3123
Pleuroceridae vs Chironomidae -671.86 195.5877 -3.44 0.858 -1514.773 171.0532
Lumbriculidae vs Limnephilidae -775.8 225.8452 -3.44 0.858 -1749.112 197.5123
Elmidae vs Daphnidae 598.274 174.939 3.42 0.899 -155.6504 1352.198
Limnephilidae vs Cottidae 772.3 225.8452 3.42 0.9 -201.0123 1745.612
Crangonyctidae vs Chironomidae -544.05 159.6967 -3.41 0.936 -1232.286 144.1857
Hyl idae vs Elmidae -663.455 195.5877 -3.39 0.979 -1506.368 179.4581
Asellidae vs Acipenseridae 225.9 195.5877 1.15 1 -617.0132 1068.813
Baetidae vs Acipenseridae 108.95 195.5877 0.56 1 -733.9632 951.8632
Cambaridae vs Acipenseridae 507.2333 184.4019 2.75 1 -287.4728 1301.939
Catostomidae vs Acipenseridae -51.78 178.5463 -0.29 1 -821.2509 717.6909
Centrarchidae vs Acipenseridae -52.705 172.4922 -0.31 1 -796.0845 690.6745
Chironomidae vs Acipenseridae 583.7 195.5877 2.98 1 -259.2132 1426.613
Chydoridae vs Acipenseridae 5.900009 225.8452 0.03 1 -967.4123 979.2123
Cichl idae vs Acipenseridae 28.5 225.8452 0.13 1 -944.8123 1001.812
Coenagrionidae vs Acipenseridae 7.300003 225.8452 0.03 1 -966.0123 980.6123
Cottidae vs Acipenseridae 65.5 225.8452 0.29 1 -907.8123 1038.812
Crangonyctidae vs Acipenseridae 39.65 195.5877 0.2 1 -803.2632 882.5632
Cyprinidae vs Acipenseridae -48.41888 168.3351 -0.29 1 -773.883 677.0453
Daphnidae vs Acipenseridae -19.074 174.939 -0.11 1 -772.9985 734.8505
Dendrocoelidae vs Acipenseridae -37.2 225.8452 -0.16 1 -1010.512 936.1123
OreoHelix Consulting, Moab, UT
Does Phylogeny Predict Sensitivity to Ammonia in Freshwater Animals?
18
Elmidae vs Acipenseridae 579.2 225.8452 2.56 1 -394.1123 1552.512
Ephemereliidae vs Acipenseridae 285.7 225.8452 1.27 1 -687.6123 1259.012
Gasterosteidae vs Acipenseridae 124.8 225.8452 0.55 1 -848.5123 1098.112
Hyalellidae vs Acipenseridae 35.90001 225.8452 0.16 1 -937.4123 1009.212
Hydrobi idae vs Acipenseridae -94.55 225.8452 -0.42 1 -1067.862 878.7623
Hyl idae vs Acipenseridae -84.255 195.5877 -0.43 1 -927.1682 758.6582
Icta luridae vs Acipenseridae -14.3 225.8452 -0.06 1 -987.6123 959.0123
Libellulidae vs Acipenseridae 76.3 225.8452 0.34 1 -897.0123 1049.612
Lumbriculidae vs Acipenseridae 62 225.8452 0.27 1 -911.3123 1035.312
Lymnaeidae vs Acipenseridae -68.07999 225.8452 -0.3 1 -1041.392 905.2323
Moronidae vs Acipenseridae -8.419998 178.5463 -0.05 1 -777.8909 761.0509
Naididae vs Acipenseridae 59.8 225.8452 0.26 1 -913.5123 1033.112
Percidae vs Acipenseridae -68.12667 184.4019 -0.37 1 -862.8328 726.5795
Perlodidae vs Acipenseridae 35.7 225.8452 0.16 1 -937.6123 1009.012
Phys idae vs Acipenseridae 7.800003 225.8452 0.03 1 -965.5123 981.1123
Pipidae vs Acipenseridae -34.2 225.8452 -0.15 1 -1007.512 939.1123
Planorbidae vs Acipenseridae 54.90001 225.8452 0.24 1 -918.4123 1028.212
Pleuroceridae vs Acipenseridae -88.16 225.8452 -0.39 1 -1061.472 885.1523
Poeci liidae vs Acipenseridae -9.719994 195.5877 -0.05 1 -852.6332 833.1932
Ranidae vs Acipenseridae -60.32 225.8452 -0.27 1 -1033.632 912.9923
Sa lmonidae vs Acipenseridae -44.943 167.4913 -0.27 1 -766.7707 676.8847
Sphaeriidae vs Acipenseridae -67.34 225.8452 -0.3 1 -1040.652 905.9723
Tubi ficidae vs Acipenseridae 13.5 225.8452 0.06 1 -959.8123 986.8123
Unionidae vs Acipenseridae -101.9794 164.3266 -0.62 1 -810.1681 606.2093
Baetidae vs Asellidae -116.95 159.6967 -0.73 1 -805.1857 571.2857
Cambaridae vs Asellidae 281.3333 145.7825 1.93 1 -346.9371 909.6037
Catostomidae vs Asellidae -277.68 138.3014 -2.01 1 -873.7096 318.3496
Centrarchidae vs Asellidae -278.605 130.3918 -2.14 1 -840.5471 283.3371
Chironomidae vs Asellidae 357.8 159.6967 2.24 1 -330.4357 1046.036
Chydoridae vs Asellidae -220 195.5877 -1.12 1 -1062.913 622.9132
Cichl idae vs Asellidae -197.4 195.5877 -1.01 1 -1040.313 645.5132
Coenagrionidae vs Asellidae -218.6 195.5877 -1.12 1 -1061.513 624.3132
Cottidae vs Asellidae -160.4 195.5877 -0.82 1 -1003.313 682.5132
Crangonyctidae vs Asellidae -186.25 159.6967 -1.17 1 -874.4857 501.9857
Cyprinidae vs Asellidae -274.3189 124.8407 -2.2 1 -812.3375 263.6997
Daphnidae vs Asellidae -244.974 133.6118 -1.83 1 -820.7933 330.8453
Dendrocoelidae vs Asellidae -263.1 195.5877 -1.35 1 -1106.013 579.8132
Elmidae vs Asellidae 353.3 195.5877 1.81 1 -489.6131 1196.213
Ephemereliidae vs Asellidae 59.79999 195.5877 0.31 1 -783.1132 902.7132
OreoHelix Consulting, Moab, UT
Does Phylogeny Predict Sensitivity to Ammonia in Freshwater Animals?
19
Gasterosteidae vs Asellidae -101.1 195.5877 -0.52 1 -944.0132 741.8132
Hyalellidae vs Asellidae -190 195.5877 -0.97 1 -1032.913 652.9132
Hydrobi idae vs Asellidae -320.45 195.5877 -1.64 1 -1163.363 522.4632
Hyl idae vs Asellidae -310.155 159.6967 -1.94 1 -998.3907 378.0807
Icta luridae vs Asellidae -240.2 195.5877 -1.23 1 -1083.113 602.7132
Libellulidae vs Asellidae -149.6 195.5877 -0.76 1 -992.5132 693.3132
Limnephilidae vs Asellidae 611.9 195.5877 3.13 1 -231.0132 1454.813
Lumbriculidae vs Asellidae -163.9 195.5877 -0.84 1 -1006.813 679.0132
Lymnaeidae vs Asellidae -293.98 195.5877 -1.5 1 -1136.893 548.9332
Moronidae vs Asellidae -234.32 138.3014 -1.69 1 -830.3496 361.7096
Naididae vs Asellidae -166.1 195.5877 -0.85 1 -1009.013 676.8132
Percidae vs Asellidae -294.0267 145.7825 -2.02 1 -922.2971 334.2437
Perlodidae vs Asellidae -190.2 195.5877 -0.97 1 -1033.113 652.7132
Phys idae vs Asellidae -218.1 195.5877 -1.12 1 -1061.013 624.8132
Pipidae vs Asellidae -260.1 195.5877 -1.33 1 -1103.013 582.8132
Planorbidae vs Asellidae -171 195.5877 -0.87 1 -1013.913 671.9132
Pleuroceridae vs Asellidae -314.06 195.5877 -1.61 1 -1156.973 528.8532
Poeci liidae vs Asellidae -235.62 159.6967 -1.48 1 -923.8557 452.6157
Ranidae vs Asellidae -286.22 195.5877 -1.46 1 -1129.133 556.6932
Sa lmonidae vs Asellidae -270.843 123.7005 -2.19 1 -803.9481 262.2621
Sphaeriidae vs Asellidae -293.24 195.5877 -1.5 1 -1136.153 549.6732
Tubi ficidae vs Asellidae -212.4 195.5877 -1.09 1 -1055.313 630.5132
Unionidae vs Asellidae -327.8794 119.3805 -2.75 1 -842.3666 186.6078
Cambaridae vs Baetidae 398.2833 145.7825 2.73 1 -229.987 1026.554
Catostomidae vs Baetidae -160.73 138.3014 -1.16 1 -756.7596 435.2996
Centrarchidae vs Baetidae -161.655 130.3918 -1.24 1 -723.5971 400.2871
Chironomidae vs Baetidae 474.75 159.6967 2.97 1 -213.4857 1162.986
Chydoridae vs Baetidae -103.05 195.5877 -0.53 1 -945.9632 739.8632
Cichl idae vs Baetidae -80.45 195.5877 -0.41 1 -923.3632 762.4632
Coenagrionidae vs Baetidae -101.65 195.5877 -0.52 1 -944.5632 741.2632
Cottidae vs Baetidae -43.45 195.5877 -0.22 1 -886.3632 799.4632
Crangonyctidae vs Baetidae -69.3 159.6967 -0.43 1 -757.5357 618.9357
Cyprinidae vs Baetidae -157.3689 124.8407 -1.26 1 -695.3875 380.6497
Daphnidae vs Baetidae -128.024 133.6118 -0.96 1 -703.8433 447.7953
Dendrocoelidae vs Baetidae -146.15 195.5877 -0.75 1 -989.0632 696.7632
Elmidae vs Baetidae 470.25 195.5877 2.4 1 -372.6631 1313.163
Ephemereliidae vs Baetidae 176.75 195.5877 0.9 1 -666.1632 1019.663
Gasterosteidae vs Baetidae 15.85 195.5877 0.08 1 -827.0632 858.7632
Hyalellidae vs Baetidae -73.05 195.5877 -0.37 1 -915.9632 769.8632
OreoHelix Consulting, Moab, UT
Does Phylogeny Predict Sensitivity to Ammonia in Freshwater Animals?
20
Hydrobi idae vs Baetidae -203.5 195.5877 -1.04 1 -1046.413 639.4132
Hyl idae vs Baetidae -193.205 159.6967 -1.21 1 -881.4407 495.0307
Icta luridae vs Baetidae -123.25 195.5877 -0.63 1 -966.1632 719.6632
Libellulidae vs Baetidae -32.65 195.5877 -0.17 1 -875.5632 810.2632
Lumbriculidae vs Baetidae -46.95 195.5877 -0.24 1 -889.8632 795.9632
Lymnaeidae vs Baetidae -177.03 195.5877 -0.91 1 -1019.943 665.8832
Moronidae vs Baetidae -117.37 138.3014 -0.85 1 -713.3996 478.6596
Naididae vs Baetidae -49.15 195.5877 -0.25 1 -892.0632 793.7632
Percidae vs Baetidae -177.0767 145.7825 -1.21 1 -805.347 451.1937
Perlodidae vs Baetidae -73.25001 195.5877 -0.37 1 -916.1632 769.6632
Phys idae vs Baetidae -101.15 195.5877 -0.52 1 -944.0632 741.7632
Pipidae vs Baetidae -143.15 195.5877 -0.73 1 -986.0632 699.7632
Planorbidae vs Baetidae -54.05 195.5877 -0.28 1 -896.9632 788.8632
Pleuroceridae vs Baetidae -197.11 195.5877 -1.01 1 -1040.023 645.8032
Poeci liidae vs Baetidae -118.67 159.6967 -0.74 1 -806.9057 569.5657
Ranidae vs Baetidae -169.27 195.5877 -0.87 1 -1012.183 673.6432
Sa lmonidae vs Baetidae -153.893 123.7005 -1.24 1 -686.9981 379.2121
Sphaeriidae vs Baetidae -176.29 195.5877 -0.9 1 -1019.203 666.6232
Tubi ficidae vs Baetidae -95.45 195.5877 -0.49 1 -938.3632 747.4632
Unionidae vs Baetidae -210.9294 119.3805 -1.77 1 -725.4166 303.5578
Chironomidae vs Cambaridae 76.46666 145.7825 0.52 1 -551.8037 704.737
Chydoridae vs Cambaridae -501.3333 184.4019 -2.72 1 -1296.039 293.3728
Cichl idae vs Cambaridae -478.7333 184.4019 -2.6 1 -1273.439 315.9728
Coenagrionidae vs Cambaridae -499.9333 184.4019 -2.71 1 -1294.639 294.7728
Cottidae vs Cambaridae -441.7333 184.4019 -2.4 1 -1236.439 352.9728
Crangonyctidae vs Cambaridae -467.5833 145.7825 -3.21 1 -1095.854 160.687
Dendrocoelidae vs Cambaridae -544.4333 184.4019 -2.95 1 -1339.139 250.2728
Elmidae vs Cambaridae 71.9667 184.4019 0.39 1 -722.7395 866.6728
Ephemereliidae vs Cambaridae -221.5333 184.4019 -1.2 1 -1016.239 573.1728
Gasterosteidae vs Cambaridae -382.4333 184.4019 -2.07 1 -1177.139 412.2728
Hyalellidae vs Cambaridae -471.3333 184.4019 -2.56 1 -1266.039 323.3728
Hydrobi idae vs Cambaridae -601.7833 184.4019 -3.26 1 -1396.489 192.9228
Icta luridae vs Cambaridae -521.5333 184.4019 -2.83 1 -1316.239 273.1728
Libellulidae vs Cambaridae -430.9333 184.4019 -2.34 1 -1225.639 363.7728
Limnephilidae vs Cambaridae 330.5667 184.4019 1.79 1 -464.1395 1125.273
Lumbriculidae vs Cambaridae -445.2333 184.4019 -2.41 1 -1239.939 349.4728
Lymnaeidae vs Cambaridae -575.3133 184.4019 -3.12 1 -1370.019 219.3928
Naididae vs Cambaridae -447.4333 184.4019 -2.43 1 -1242.139 347.2728
Perlodidae vs Cambaridae -471.5333 184.4019 -2.56 1 -1266.239 323.1728
OreoHelix Consulting, Moab, UT
Does Phylogeny Predict Sensitivity to Ammonia in Freshwater Animals?
21
Phys idae vs Cambaridae -499.4333 184.4019 -2.71 1 -1294.139 295.2728
Pipidae vs Cambaridae -541.4333 184.4019 -2.94 1 -1336.139 253.2728
Planorbidae vs Cambaridae -452.3333 184.4019 -2.45 1 -1247.039 342.3728
Pleuroceridae vs Cambaridae -595.3933 184.4019 -3.23 1 -1390.099 199.3128
Ranidae vs Cambaridae -567.5533 184.4019 -3.08 1 -1362.259 227.1528
Sphaeriidae vs Cambaridae -574.5733 184.4019 -3.12 1 -1369.279 220.1328
Tubi ficidae vs Cambaridae -493.7333 184.4019 -2.68 1 -1288.439 300.9728
Centrarchidae vs Catostomidae -0.9249983 103.0838 -0.01 1 -445.1792 443.3292
Chydoridae vs Catostomidae 57.68001 178.5463 0.32 1 -711.7909 827.1509
Cichl idae vs Catostomidae 80.28 178.5463 0.45 1 -689.1909 849.7509
Coenagrionidae vs Catostomidae 59.08 178.5463 0.33 1 -710.3909 828.5509
Cottidae vs Catostomidae 117.28 178.5463 0.66 1 -652.1909 886.7509
Crangonyctidae vs Catostomidae 91.43 138.3014 0.66 1 -504.5996 687.4596
Cyprinidae vs Catostomidae 3.361114 95.96577 0.04 1 -410.2171 416.9393
Daphnidae vs Catostomidae 32.706 107.1278 0.31 1 -428.9766 494.3886
Dendrocoelidae vs Catostomidae 14.58 178.5463 0.08 1 -754.8909 784.0509
Ephemereliidae vs Catostomidae 337.48 178.5463 1.89 1 -431.9909 1106.951
Gasterosteidae vs Catostomidae 176.58 178.5463 0.99 1 -592.8909 946.0509
Hyalellidae vs Catostomidae 87.68001 178.5463 0.49 1 -681.7909 857.1509
Hydrobi idae vs Catostomidae -42.77 178.5463 -0.24 1 -812.2409 726.7009
Hyl idae vs Catostomidae -32.475 138.3014 -0.23 1 -628.5046 563.5546
Icta luridae vs Catostomidae 37.47999 178.5463 0.21 1 -731.9909 806.9509
Libellulidae vs Catostomidae 128.08 178.5463 0.72 1 -641.3909 897.5509
Lumbriculidae vs Catostomidae 113.78 178.5463 0.64 1 -655.6909 883.2509
Lymnaeidae vs Catostomidae -16.3 178.5463 -0.09 1 -785.7709 753.1709
Moronidae vs Catostomidae 43.36 112.9226 0.38 1 -443.2961 530.0161
Naididae vs Catostomidae 111.58 178.5463 0.62 1 -657.8909 881.0509
Percidae vs Catostomidae -16.34667 121.9704 -0.13 1 -541.9954 509.302
Perlodidae vs Catostomidae 87.47999 178.5463 0.49 1 -681.9909 856.9509
Phys idae vs Catostomidae 59.58 178.5463 0.33 1 -709.8909 829.0509
Pipidae vs Catostomidae 17.58 178.5463 0.1 1 -751.8909 787.0509
Planorbidae vs Catostomidae 106.68 178.5463 0.6 1 -662.7909 876.1509
Pleuroceridae vs Catostomidae -36.38 178.5463 -0.2 1 -805.8509 733.0909
Poeci liidae vs Catostomidae 42.06 138.3014 0.3 1 -553.9696 638.0896
Ranidae vs Catostomidae -8.540002 178.5463 -0.05 1 -778.0109 760.9309
Sa lmonidae vs Catostomidae 6.837001 94.47784 0.07 1 -400.3287 414.0027
Sphaeriidae vs Catostomidae -15.56 178.5463 -0.09 1 -785.0309 753.9109
Tubi ficidae vs Catostomidae 65.28 178.5463 0.37 1 -704.1909 834.7509
Unionidae vs Catostomidae -50.19941 88.74648 -0.57 1 -432.665 332.2662
OreoHelix Consulting, Moab, UT
Does Phylogeny Predict Sensitivity to Ammonia in Freshwater Animals?
22
Chydoridae vs Centrarchidae 58.60501 172.4922 0.34 1 -684.7745 801.9845
Cichl idae vs Centrarchidae 81.205 172.4922 0.47 1 -662.1745 824.5845
Coenagrionidae vs Centrarchidae 60.005 172.4922 0.35 1 -683.3745 803.3845
Cottidae vs Centrarchidae 118.205 172.4922 0.69 1 -625.1745 861.5845
Crangonyctidae vs Centrarchidae 92.355 130.3918 0.71 1 -469.5871 654.2971
Cyprinidae vs Centrarchidae 4.286112 84.16755 0.05 1 -358.446 367.0182
Daphnidae vs Centrarchidae 33.631 96.70116 0.35 1 -383.1164 450.3784
Dendrocoelidae vs Centrarchidae 15.505 172.4922 0.09 1 -727.8745 758.8845
Ephemereliidae vs Centrarchidae 338.405 172.4922 1.96 1 -404.9745 1081.785
Gasterosteidae vs Centrarchidae 177.505 172.4922 1.03 1 -565.8745 920.8845
Hyalellidae vs Centrarchidae 88.60501 172.4922 0.51 1 -654.7745 831.9845
Hydrobi idae vs Centrarchidae -41.845 172.4922 -0.24 1 -785.2245 701.5345
Hyl idae vs Centrarchidae -31.55 130.3918 -0.24 1 -593.4921 530.3921
Icta luridae vs Centrarchidae 38.40499 172.4922 0.22 1 -704.9745 781.7845
Libellulidae vs Centrarchidae 129.005 172.4922 0.75 1 -614.3745 872.3845
Lumbriculidae vs Centrarchidae 114.705 172.4922 0.66 1 -628.6745 858.0845
Lymnaeidae vs Centrarchidae -15.375 172.4922 -0.09 1 -758.7545 728.0045
Moronidae vs Centrarchidae 44.285 103.0838 0.43 1 -399.9692 488.5392
Naididae vs Centrarchidae 112.505 172.4922 0.65 1 -630.8745 855.8845
Percidae vs Centrarchidae -15.42167 112.9226 -0.14 1 -502.0778 471.2345
Perlodidae vs Centrarchidae 88.40499 172.4922 0.51 1 -654.9745 831.7845
Phys idae vs Centrarchidae 60.505 172.4922 0.35 1 -682.8745 803.8845
Pipidae vs Centrarchidae 18.505 172.4922 0.11 1 -724.8745 761.8845
Planorbidae vs Centrarchidae 107.605 172.4922 0.62 1 -635.7745 850.9845
Pleuroceridae vs Centrarchidae -35.455 172.4922 -0.21 1 -778.8345 707.9245
Poeci liidae vs Centrarchidae 42.985 130.3918 0.33 1 -518.9571 604.9271
Ranidae vs Centrarchidae -7.615004 172.4922 -0.04 1 -750.9945 735.7645
Sa lmonidae vs Centrarchidae 7.761999 82.46702 0.09 1 -347.6414 363.1654
Sphaeriidae vs Centrarchidae -14.635 172.4922 -0.08 1 -758.0145 728.7445
Tubi ficidae vs Centrarchidae 66.205 172.4922 0.38 1 -677.1745 809.5845
Unionidae vs Centrarchidae -49.27441 75.83327 -0.65 1 -376.0887 277.5399
Chydoridae vs Chironomidae -577.8 195.5877 -2.95 1 -1420.713 265.1132
Cichl idae vs Chironomidae -555.2 195.5877 -2.84 1 -1398.113 287.7132
Coenagrionidae vs Chironomidae -576.4 195.5877 -2.95 1 -1419.313 266.5132
Cottidae vs Chironomidae -518.2 195.5877 -2.65 1 -1361.113 324.7132
Dendrocoelidae vs Chironomidae -620.9 195.5877 -3.17 1 -1463.813 222.0132
Elmidae vs Chironomidae -4.499969 195.5877 -0.02 1 -847.4131 838.4132
Ephemereliidae vs Chironomidae -298 195.5877 -1.52 1 -1140.913 544.9132
Gasterosteidae vs Chironomidae -458.9 195.5877 -2.35 1 -1301.813 384.0132
OreoHelix Consulting, Moab, UT
Does Phylogeny Predict Sensitivity to Ammonia in Freshwater Animals?
23
Hyalellidae vs Chironomidae -547.8 195.5877 -2.8 1 -1390.713 295.1132
Icta luridae vs Chironomidae -598 195.5877 -3.06 1 -1440.913 244.9132
Libellulidae vs Chironomidae -507.4 195.5877 -2.59 1 -1350.313 335.5132
Limnephilidae vs Chironomidae 254.1 195.5877 1.3 1 -588.8132 1097.013
Lumbriculidae vs Chironomidae -521.7 195.5877 -2.67 1 -1364.613 321.2132
Lymnaeidae vs Chironomidae -651.78 195.5877 -3.33 1 -1494.693 191.1332
Naididae vs Chironomidae -523.9 195.5877 -2.68 1 -1366.813 319.0132
Perlodidae vs Chironomidae -548 195.5877 -2.8 1 -1390.913 294.9132
Phys idae vs Chironomidae -575.9 195.5877 -2.94 1 -1418.813 267.0132
Pipidae vs Chironomidae -617.9 195.5877 -3.16 1 -1460.813 225.0132
Planorbidae vs Chironomidae -528.8 195.5877 -2.7 1 -1371.713 314.1132
Ranidae vs Chironomidae -644.02 195.5877 -3.29 1 -1486.933 198.8932
Sphaeriidae vs Chironomidae -651.04 195.5877 -3.33 1 -1493.953 191.8732
Tubi ficidae vs Chironomidae -570.2 195.5877 -2.92 1 -1413.113 272.7132
Cichl idae vs Chydoridae 22.59999 225.8452 0.1 1 -950.7123 995.9123
Coenagrionidae vs Chydoridae 1.399994 225.8452 0.01 1 -971.9123 974.7123
Cottidae vs Chydoridae 59.59999 225.8452 0.26 1 -913.7123 1032.912
Crangonyctidae vs Chydoridae 33.74999 195.5877 0.17 1 -809.1632 876.6632
Cyprinidae vs Chydoridae -54.31889 168.3351 -0.32 1 -779.783 671.1452
Daphnidae vs Chydoridae -24.97401 174.939 -0.14 1 -778.8985 728.9504
Dendrocoelidae vs Chydoridae -43.10001 225.8452 -0.19 1 -1016.412 930.2123
Elmidae vs Chydoridae 573.3 225.8452 2.54 1 -400.0123 1546.612
Ephemereliidae vs Chydoridae 279.8 225.8452 1.24 1 -693.5123 1253.112
Gasterosteidae vs Chydoridae 118.9 225.8452 0.53 1 -854.4123 1092.212
Hyalellidae vs Chydoridae 30 225.8452 0.13 1 -943.3123 1003.312
Hydrobi idae vs Chydoridae -100.45 225.8452 -0.44 1 -1073.762 872.8623
Hyl idae vs Chydoridae -90.15501 195.5877 -0.46 1 -933.0682 752.7582
Icta luridae vs Chydoridae -20.20001 225.8452 -0.09 1 -993.5123 953.1123
Libellulidae vs Chydoridae 70.39999 225.8452 0.31 1 -902.9123 1043.712
Lumbriculidae vs Chydoridae 56.09999 225.8452 0.25 1 -917.2123 1029.412
Lymnaeidae vs Chydoridae -73.98 225.8452 -0.33 1 -1047.292 899.3323
Moronidae vs Chydoridae -14.32001 178.5463 -0.08 1 -783.7909 755.1509
Naididae vs Chydoridae 53.89999 225.8452 0.24 1 -919.4123 1027.212
Percidae vs Chydoridae -74.02667 184.4019 -0.4 1 -868.7328 720.6795
Perlodidae vs Chydoridae 29.79999 225.8452 0.13 1 -943.5123 1003.112
Phys idae vs Chydoridae 1.899994 225.8452 0.01 1 -971.4123 975.2123
Pipidae vs Chydoridae -40.10001 225.8452 -0.18 1 -1013.412 933.2123
Planorbidae vs Chydoridae 49 225.8452 0.22 1 -924.3123 1022.312
Pleuroceridae vs Chydoridae -94.06001 225.8452 -0.42 1 -1067.372 879.2523
OreoHelix Consulting, Moab, UT
Does Phylogeny Predict Sensitivity to Ammonia in Freshwater Animals?
24
Poeci liidae vs Chydoridae -15.62 195.5877 -0.08 1 -858.5332 827.2932
Ranidae vs Chydoridae -66.22001 225.8452 -0.29 1 -1039.532 907.0923
Sa lmonidae vs Chydoridae -50.84301 167.4913 -0.3 1 -772.6707 670.9847
Sphaeriidae vs Chydoridae -73.24001 225.8452 -0.32 1 -1046.552 900.0723
Tubi ficidae vs Chydoridae 7.599991 225.8452 0.03 1 -965.7123 980.9123
Unionidae vs Chydoridae -107.8794 164.3266 -0.66 1 -816.0681 600.3093
Coenagrionidae vs Cichlidae -21.2 225.8452 -0.09 1 -994.5123 952.1123
Cottidae vs Cichlidae 37 225.8452 0.16 1 -936.3123 1010.312
Crangonyctidae vs Cichlidae 11.15 195.5877 0.06 1 -831.7632 854.0632
Cyprinidae vs Cichlidae -76.91888 168.3351 -0.46 1 -802.383 648.5453
Daphnidae vs Cichlidae -47.574 174.939 -0.27 1 -801.4985 706.3505
Dendrocoelidae vs Cichlidae -65.7 225.8452 -0.29 1 -1039.012 907.6123
Elmidae vs Cichlidae 550.7 225.8452 2.44 1 -422.6123 1524.012
Ephemereliidae vs Cichlidae 257.2 225.8452 1.14 1 -716.1123 1230.512
Gasterosteidae vs Cichlidae 96.3 225.8452 0.43 1 -877.0123 1069.612
Hyalellidae vs Cichlidae 7.400009 225.8452 0.03 1 -965.9123 980.7123
Hydrobi idae vs Cichlidae -123.05 225.8452 -0.54 1 -1096.362 850.2623
Hyl idae vs Cichlidae -112.755 195.5877 -0.58 1 -955.6682 730.1582
Icta luridae vs Cichlidae -42.8 225.8452 -0.19 1 -1016.112 930.5123
Libellulidae vs Cichlidae 47.8 225.8452 0.21 1 -925.5123 1021.112
Lumbriculidae vs Cichlidae 33.5 225.8452 0.15 1 -939.8123 1006.812
Lymnaeidae vs Cichlidae -96.57999 225.8452 -0.43 1 -1069.892 876.7323
Moronidae vs Cichlidae -36.92 178.5463 -0.21 1 -806.3909 732.5509
Naididae vs Cichlidae 31.3 225.8452 0.14 1 -942.0123 1004.612
Percidae vs Cichlidae -96.62667 184.4019 -0.52 1 -891.3328 698.0795
Perlodidae vs Cichlidae 7.199997 225.8452 0.03 1 -966.1123 980.5123
Phys idae vs Cichlidae -20.7 225.8452 -0.09 1 -994.0123 952.6123
Pipidae vs Cichlidae -62.7 225.8452 -0.28 1 -1036.012 910.6123
Planorbidae vs Cichlidae 26.40001 225.8452 0.12 1 -946.9123 999.7123
Pleuroceridae vs Cichlidae -116.66 225.8452 -0.52 1 -1089.972 856.6523
Poeci liidae vs Cichlidae -38.21999 195.5877 -0.2 1 -881.1332 804.6932
Ranidae vs Cichlidae -88.82 225.8452 -0.39 1 -1062.132 884.4923
Sa lmonidae vs Cichlidae -73.443 167.4913 -0.44 1 -795.2707 648.3847
Sphaeriidae vs Cichlidae -95.84 225.8452 -0.42 1 -1069.152 877.4723
Tubi ficidae vs Cichlidae -15 225.8452 -0.07 1 -988.3123 958.3123
Unionidae vs Cichlidae -130.4794 164.3266 -0.79 1 -838.6681 577.7093
Cottidae vs Coenagrionidae 58.2 225.8452 0.26 1 -915.1123 1031.512
Crangonyctidae vs Coenagrionidae 32.35 195.5877 0.17 1 -810.5632 875.2632
Cyprinidae vs Coenagrionidae -55.71889 168.3351 -0.33 1 -781.183 669.7453
OreoHelix Consulting, Moab, UT
Does Phylogeny Predict Sensitivity to Ammonia in Freshwater Animals?
25
Daphnidae vs Coenagrionidae -26.374 174.939 -0.15 1 -780.2985 727.5505
Dendrocoelidae vs Coenagrionidae -44.5 225.8452 -0.2 1 -1017.812 928.8123
Elmidae vs Coenagrionidae 571.9 225.8452 2.53 1 -401.4123 1545.212
Ephemereliidae vs Coenagrionidae 278.4 225.8452 1.23 1 -694.9123 1251.712
Gasterosteidae vs Coenagrionidae 117.5 225.8452 0.52 1 -855.8123 1090.812
Hyalellidae vs Coenagrionidae 28.60001 225.8452 0.13 1 -944.7123 1001.912
Hydrobi idae vs Coenagrionidae -101.85 225.8452 -0.45 1 -1075.162 871.4623
Hyl idae vs Coenagrionidae -91.555 195.5877 -0.47 1 -934.4682 751.3582
Icta luridae vs Coenagrionidae -21.60001 225.8452 -0.1 1 -994.9123 951.7123
Libellulidae vs Coenagrionidae 69 225.8452 0.31 1 -904.3123 1042.312
Lumbriculidae vs Coenagrionidae 54.7 225.8452 0.24 1 -918.6123 1028.012
Lymnaeidae vs Coenagrionidae -75.38 225.8452 -0.33 1 -1048.692 897.9323
Moronidae vs Coenagrionidae -15.72 178.5463 -0.09 1 -785.1909 753.7509
Naididae vs Coenagrionidae 52.5 225.8452 0.23 1 -920.8123 1025.812
Percidae vs Coenagrionidae -75.42667 184.4019 -0.41 1 -870.1328 719.2795
Perlodidae vs Coenagrionidae 28.39999 225.8452 0.13 1 -944.9123 1001.712
Phys idae vs Coenagrionidae 0.5 225.8452 0 1 -972.8123 973.8123
Pipidae vs Coenagrionidae -41.5 225.8452 -0.18 1 -1014.812 931.8123
Planorbidae vs Coenagrionidae 47.60001 225.8452 0.21 1 -925.7123 1020.912
Pleuroceridae vs Coenagrionidae -95.46 225.8452 -0.42 1 -1068.772 877.8523
Poeci liidae vs Coenagrionidae -17.02 195.5877 -0.09 1 -859.9332 825.8932
Ranidae vs Coenagrionidae -67.62 225.8452 -0.3 1 -1040.932 905.6923
Sa lmonidae vs Coenagrionidae -52.243 167.4913 -0.31 1 -774.0707 669.5847
Sphaeriidae vs Coenagrionidae -74.64 225.8452 -0.33 1 -1047.952 898.6723
Tubi ficidae vs Coenagrionidae 6.199997 225.8452 0.03 1 -967.1123 979.5123
Unionidae vs Coenagrionidae -109.2794 164.3266 -0.67 1 -817.4681 598.9093
Crangonyctidae vs Cottidae -25.85 195.5877 -0.13 1 -868.7632 817.0632
Cyprinidae vs Cottidae -113.9189 168.3351 -0.68 1 -839.383 611.5453
Daphnidae vs Cottidae -84.574 174.939 -0.48 1 -838.4985 669.3505
Dendrocoelidae vs Cottidae -102.7 225.8452 -0.45 1 -1076.012 870.6123
Elmidae vs Cottidae 513.7 225.8452 2.27 1 -459.6123 1487.012
Ephemereliidae vs Cottidae 220.2 225.8452 0.98 1 -753.1123 1193.512
Gasterosteidae vs Cottidae 59.3 225.8452 0.26 1 -914.0123 1032.612
Hyalellidae vs Cottidae -29.59999 225.8452 -0.13 1 -1002.912 943.7123
Hydrobi idae vs Cottidae -160.05 225.8452 -0.71 1 -1133.362 813.2623
Hyl idae vs Cottidae -149.755 195.5877 -0.77 1 -992.6682 693.1582
Icta luridae vs Cottidae -79.8 225.8452 -0.35 1 -1053.112 893.5123
Libellulidae vs Cottidae 10.8 225.8452 0.05 1 -962.5123 984.1123
Lumbriculidae vs Cottidae -3.5 225.8452 -0.02 1 -976.8123 969.8123
OreoHelix Consulting, Moab, UT
Does Phylogeny Predict Sensitivity to Ammonia in Freshwater Animals?
26
Lymnaeidae vs Cottidae -133.58 225.8452 -0.59 1 -1106.892 839.7323
Moronidae vs Cottidae -73.92 178.5463 -0.41 1 -843.3909 695.5509
Naididae vs Cottidae -5.699997 225.8452 -0.03 1 -979.0123 967.6123
Percidae vs Cottidae -133.6267 184.4019 -0.72 1 -928.3328 661.0795
Perlodidae vs Cottidae -29.8 225.8452 -0.13 1 -1003.112 943.5123
Phys idae vs Cottidae -57.7 225.8452 -0.26 1 -1031.012 915.6123
Pipidae vs Cottidae -99.7 225.8452 -0.44 1 -1073.012 873.6123
Planorbidae vs Cottidae -10.59999 225.8452 -0.05 1 -983.9123 962.7123
Pleuroceridae vs Cottidae -153.66 225.8452 -0.68 1 -1126.972 819.6523
Poeci liidae vs Cottidae -75.21999 195.5877 -0.38 1 -918.1332 767.6932
Ranidae vs Cottidae -125.82 225.8452 -0.56 1 -1099.132 847.4923
Sa lmonidae vs Cottidae -110.443 167.4913 -0.66 1 -832.2707 611.3847
Sphaeriidae vs Cottidae -132.84 225.8452 -0.59 1 -1106.152 840.4723
Tubi ficidae vs Cottidae -52 225.8452 -0.23 1 -1025.312 921.3123
Unionidae vs Cottidae -167.4794 164.3266 -1.02 1 -875.6681 540.7093
Cyprinidae vs Crangonyctidae -88.06889 124.8407 -0.71 1 -626.0875 449.9497
Daphnidae vs Crangonyctidae -58.724 133.6118 -0.44 1 -634.5433 517.0953
Dendrocoelidae vs Crangonyctidae -76.85 195.5877 -0.39 1 -919.7632 766.0632
Elmidae vs Crangonyctidae 539.55 195.5877 2.76 1 -303.3631 1382.463
Ephemereliidae vs Crangonyctidae 246.05 195.5877 1.26 1 -596.8632 1088.963
Gasterosteidae vs Crangonyctidae 85.15 195.5877 0.44 1 -757.7632 928.0632
Hyalellidae vs Crangonyctidae -3.749992 195.5877 -0.02 1 -846.6632 839.1632
Hydrobi idae vs Crangonyctidae -134.2 195.5877 -0.69 1 -977.1132 708.7132
Hyl idae vs Crangonyctidae -123.905 159.6967 -0.78 1 -812.1407 564.3307
Icta luridae vs Crangonyctidae -53.95 195.5877 -0.28 1 -896.8632 788.9632
Libellulidae vs Crangonyctidae 36.65 195.5877 0.19 1 -806.2632 879.5632
Lumbriculidae vs Crangonyctidae 22.35 195.5877 0.11 1 -820.5632 865.2632
Lymnaeidae vs Crangonyctidae -107.73 195.5877 -0.55 1 -950.6432 735.1832
Moronidae vs Crangonyctidae -48.07 138.3014 -0.35 1 -644.0996 547.9596
Naididae vs Crangonyctidae 20.15 195.5877 0.1 1 -822.7632 863.0632
Percidae vs Crangonyctidae -107.7767 145.7825 -0.74 1 -736.047 520.4937
Perlodidae vs Crangonyctidae -3.950005 195.5877 -0.02 1 -846.8632 838.9632
Phys idae vs Crangonyctidae -31.85 195.5877 -0.16 1 -874.7632 811.0632
Pipidae vs Crangonyctidae -73.85 195.5877 -0.38 1 -916.7632 769.0632
Planorbidae vs Crangonyctidae 15.25001 195.5877 0.08 1 -827.6632 858.1632
Pleuroceridae vs Crangonyctidae -127.81 195.5877 -0.65 1 -970.7232 715.1032
Poeci liidae vs Crangonyctidae -49.37 159.6967 -0.31 1 -737.6057 638.8657
Ranidae vs Crangonyctidae -99.97 195.5877 -0.51 1 -942.8832 742.9432
Sa lmonidae vs Crangonyctidae -84.593 123.7005 -0.68 1 -617.6981 448.5121
OreoHelix Consulting, Moab, UT
Does Phylogeny Predict Sensitivity to Ammonia in Freshwater Animals?
27
Sphaeriidae vs Crangonyctidae -106.99 195.5877 -0.55 1 -949.9032 735.9232
Tubi ficidae vs Crangonyctidae -26.15 195.5877 -0.13 1 -869.0632 816.7632
Unionidae vs Crangonyctidae -141.6294 119.3805 -1.19 1 -656.1166 372.8578
Daphnidae vs Cyprinidae 29.34488 89.07456 0.33 1 -354.5347 413.2244
Dendrocoelidae vs Cyprinidae 11.21889 168.3351 0.07 1 -714.2453 736.683
Ephemereliidae vs Cyprinidae 334.1189 168.3351 1.98 1 -391.3453 1059.583
Gasterosteidae vs Cyprinidae 173.2189 168.3351 1.03 1 -552.2453 898.683
Hyalellidae vs Cyprinidae 84.31889 168.3351 0.5 1 -641.1452 809.783
Hydrobi idae vs Cyprinidae -46.13111 168.3351 -0.27 1 -771.5953 679.333
Hyl idae vs Cyprinidae -35.83611 124.8407 -0.29 1 -573.8547 502.1825
Icta luridae vs Cyprinidae 34.11888 168.3351 0.2 1 -691.3453 759.583
Libellulidae vs Cyprinidae 124.7189 168.3351 0.74 1 -600.7453 850.183
Lumbriculidae vs Cyprinidae 110.4189 168.3351 0.66 1 -615.0453 835.883
Lymnaeidae vs Cyprinidae -19.66111 168.3351 -0.12 1 -745.1253 705.803
Moronidae vs Cyprinidae 39.99889 95.96577 0.42 1 -373.5793 453.5771
Naididae vs Cyprinidae 108.2189 168.3351 0.64 1 -617.2453 833.683
Percidae vs Cyprinidae -19.70778 106.4645 -0.19 1 -478.5316 439.116
Perlodidae vs Cyprinidae 84.11888 168.3351 0.5 1 -641.3453 809.583
Phys idae vs Cyprinidae 56.21889 168.3351 0.33 1 -669.2453 781.683
Pipidae vs Cyprinidae 14.21889 168.3351 0.08 1 -711.2453 739.683
Planorbidae vs Cyprinidae 103.3189 168.3351 0.61 1 -622.1452 828.783
Pleuroceridae vs Cyprinidae -39.74111 168.3351 -0.24 1 -765.2053 685.723
Poeci liidae vs Cyprinidae 38.69889 124.8407 0.31 1 -499.3197 576.7175
Ranidae vs Cyprinidae -11.90112 168.3351 -0.07 1 -737.3653 713.563
Sa lmonidae vs Cyprinidae 3.475887 73.37557 0.05 1 -312.7466 319.6984
Sphaeriidae vs Cyprinidae -18.92111 168.3351 -0.11 1 -744.3853 706.543
Tubi ficidae vs Cyprinidae 61.91888 168.3351 0.37 1 -663.5453 787.383
Unionidae vs Cyprinidae -53.56052 65.83198 -0.81 1 -337.2728 230.1518
Dendrocoelidae vs Daphnidae -18.126 174.939 -0.1 1 -772.0505 735.7985
Ephemereliidae vs Daphnidae 304.774 174.939 1.74 1 -449.1505 1058.698
Gasterosteidae vs Daphnidae 143.874 174.939 0.82 1 -610.0505 897.7985
Hyalellidae vs Daphnidae 54.97401 174.939 0.31 1 -698.9504 808.8985
Hydrobi idae vs Daphnidae -75.476 174.939 -0.43 1 -829.4004 678.4485
Hyl idae vs Daphnidae -65.181 133.6118 -0.49 1 -641.0003 510.6383
Icta luridae vs Daphnidae 4.773996 174.939 0.03 1 -749.1505 758.6984
Libellulidae vs Daphnidae 95.374 174.939 0.55 1 -658.5505 849.2985
Lumbriculidae vs Daphnidae 81.074 174.939 0.46 1 -672.8505 834.9985
Lymnaeidae vs Daphnidae -49.006 174.939 -0.28 1 -802.9304 704.9185
Moronidae vs Daphnidae 10.654 107.1278 0.1 1 -451.0286 472.3366
OreoHelix Consulting, Moab, UT
Does Phylogeny Predict Sensitivity to Ammonia in Freshwater Animals?
28
Naididae vs Daphnidae 78.874 174.939 0.45 1 -675.0505 832.7985
Percidae vs Daphnidae -49.05267 116.626 -0.42 1 -551.669 453.5636
Perlodidae vs Daphnidae 54.774 174.939 0.31 1 -699.1505 808.6984
Phys idae vs Daphnidae 26.874 174.939 0.15 1 -727.0505 780.7985
Pipidae vs Daphnidae -15.126 174.939 -0.09 1 -769.0505 738.7985
Planorbidae vs Daphnidae 73.97401 174.939 0.42 1 -679.9504 827.8985
Pleuroceridae vs Daphnidae -69.086 174.939 -0.39 1 -823.0104 684.8385
Poeci liidae vs Daphnidae 9.354005 133.6118 0.07 1 -566.4653 585.1733
Ranidae vs Daphnidae -41.246 174.939 -0.24 1 -795.1705 712.6785
Sa lmonidae vs Daphnidae -25.869 87.46949 -0.3 1 -402.8312 351.0932
Sphaeriidae vs Daphnidae -48.266 174.939 -0.28 1 -802.1904 705.6585
Tubi ficidae vs Daphnidae 32.574 174.939 0.19 1 -721.3505 786.4985
Unionidae vs Daphnidae -82.90541 81.24522 -1.02 1 -433.0433 267.2325
Elmidae vs Dendrocoelidae 616.4 225.8452 2.73 1 -356.9123 1589.712
Ephemereliidae vs Dendrocoelidae 322.9 225.8452 1.43 1 -650.4123 1296.212
Gasterosteidae vs Dendrocoelidae 162 225.8452 0.72 1 -811.3123 1135.312
Hyalellidae vs Dendrocoelidae 73.10001 225.8452 0.32 1 -900.2123 1046.412
Hydrobi idae vs Dendrocoelidae -57.35 225.8452 -0.25 1 -1030.662 915.9623
Hyl idae vs Dendrocoelidae -47.055 195.5877 -0.24 1 -889.9682 795.8582
Icta luridae vs Dendrocoelidae 22.89999 225.8452 0.1 1 -950.4123 996.2123
Libellulidae vs Dendrocoelidae 113.5 225.8452 0.5 1 -859.8123 1086.812
Lumbriculidae vs Dendrocoelidae 99.2 225.8452 0.44 1 -874.1123 1072.512
Lymnaeidae vs Dendrocoelidae -30.88 225.8452 -0.14 1 -1004.192 942.4323
Moronidae vs Dendrocoelidae 28.78 178.5463 0.16 1 -740.6909 798.2509
Naididae vs Dendrocoelidae 97 225.8452 0.43 1 -876.3123 1070.312
Percidae vs Dendrocoelidae -30.92667 184.4019 -0.17 1 -825.6328 763.7795
Perlodidae vs Dendrocoelidae 72.89999 225.8452 0.32 1 -900.4123 1046.212
Phys idae vs Dendrocoelidae 45 225.8452 0.2 1 -928.3123 1018.312
Pipidae vs Dendrocoelidae 3 225.8452 0.01 1 -970.3123 976.3123
Planorbidae vs Dendrocoelidae 92.10001 225.8452 0.41 1 -881.2123 1065.412
Pleuroceridae vs Dendrocoelidae -50.96 225.8452 -0.23 1 -1024.272 922.3523
Poeci liidae vs Dendrocoelidae 27.48 195.5877 0.14 1 -815.4332 870.3932
Ranidae vs Dendrocoelidae -23.12 225.8452 -0.1 1 -996.4323 950.1923
Sa lmonidae vs Dendrocoelidae -7.743 167.4913 -0.05 1 -729.5707 714.0847
Sphaeriidae vs Dendrocoelidae -30.14 225.8452 -0.13 1 -1003.452 943.1723
Tubi ficidae vs Dendrocoelidae 50.7 225.8452 0.22 1 -922.6123 1024.012
Unionidae vs Dendrocoelidae -64.77941 164.3266 -0.39 1 -772.9681 643.4093
Ephemereliidae vs Elmidae -293.5 225.8452 -1.3 1 -1266.812 679.8123
Gasterosteidae vs Elmidae -454.4 225.8452 -2.01 1 -1427.712 518.9123
OreoHelix Consulting, Moab, UT
Does Phylogeny Predict Sensitivity to Ammonia in Freshwater Animals?
29
Hyalellidae vs Elmidae -543.3 225.8452 -2.41 1 -1516.612 430.0123
Hydrobi idae vs Elmidae -673.75 225.8452 -2.98 1 -1647.062 299.5623
Icta luridae vs Elmidae -593.5 225.8452 -2.63 1 -1566.812 379.8123
Libellulidae vs Elmidae -502.9 225.8452 -2.23 1 -1476.212 470.4123
Limnephilidae vs Elmidae 258.6 225.8452 1.15 1 -714.7123 1231.912
Lumbriculidae vs Elmidae -517.2 225.8452 -2.29 1 -1490.512 456.1123
Lymnaeidae vs Elmidae -647.28 225.8452 -2.87 1 -1620.592 326.0323
Moronidae vs Elmidae -587.62 178.5463 -3.29 1 -1357.091 181.8509
Naididae vs Elmidae -519.4 225.8452 -2.3 1 -1492.712 453.9123
Perlodidae vs Elmidae -543.5 225.8452 -2.41 1 -1516.812 429.8123
Phys idae vs Elmidae -571.4 225.8452 -2.53 1 -1544.712 401.9123
Pipidae vs Elmidae -613.4 225.8452 -2.72 1 -1586.712 359.9123
Planorbidae vs Elmidae -524.3 225.8452 -2.32 1 -1497.612 449.0123
Pleuroceridae vs Elmidae -667.36 225.8452 -2.95 1 -1640.672 305.9523
Poeci liidae vs Elmidae -588.92 195.5877 -3.01 1 -1431.833 253.9931
Ranidae vs Elmidae -639.52 225.8452 -2.83 1 -1612.832 333.7923
Sphaeriidae vs Elmidae -646.54 225.8452 -2.86 1 -1619.852 326.7723
Tubi ficidae vs Elmidae -565.7 225.8452 -2.5 1 -1539.012 407.6123
Gasterosteidae vs Ephemereliidae -160.9 225.8452 -0.71 1 -1134.212 812.4123
Hyalellidae vs Ephemereliidae -249.8 225.8452 -1.11 1 -1223.112 723.5123
Hydrobi idae vs Ephemereliidae -380.25 225.8452 -1.68 1 -1353.562 593.0623
Hyl idae vs Ephemereliidae -369.955 195.5877 -1.89 1 -1212.868 472.9582
Icta luridae vs Ephemereliidae -300 225.8452 -1.33 1 -1273.312 673.3123
Libellulidae vs Ephemereliidae -209.4 225.8452 -0.93 1 -1182.712 763.9123
Limnephilidae vs Ephemereliidae 552.1 225.8452 2.44 1 -421.2123 1525.412
Lumbriculidae vs Ephemereliidae -223.7 225.8452 -0.99 1 -1197.012 749.6123
Lymnaeidae vs Ephemereliidae -353.78 225.8452 -1.57 1 -1327.092 619.5323
Moronidae vs Ephemereliidae -294.12 178.5463 -1.65 1 -1063.591 475.3509
Naididae vs Ephemereliidae -225.9 225.8452 -1 1 -1199.212 747.4123
Percidae vs Ephemereliidae -353.8267 184.4019 -1.92 1 -1148.533 440.8795
Perlodidae vs Ephemereliidae -250 225.8452 -1.11 1 -1223.312 723.3123
Phys idae vs Ephemereliidae -277.9 225.8452 -1.23 1 -1251.212 695.4123
Pipidae vs Ephemereliidae -319.9 225.8452 -1.42 1 -1293.212 653.4123
Planorbidae vs Ephemereliidae -230.8 225.8452 -1.02 1 -1204.112 742.5123
Pleuroceridae vs Ephemereliidae -373.86 225.8452 -1.66 1 -1347.172 599.4523
Poeci liidae vs Ephemereliidae -295.42 195.5877 -1.51 1 -1138.333 547.4932
Ranidae vs Ephemereliidae -346.02 225.8452 -1.53 1 -1319.332 627.2923
Sa lmonidae vs Ephemereliidae -330.643 167.4913 -1.97 1 -1052.471 391.1847
Sphaeriidae vs Ephemereliidae -353.04 225.8452 -1.56 1 -1326.352 620.2723
OreoHelix Consulting, Moab, UT
Does Phylogeny Predict Sensitivity to Ammonia in Freshwater Animals?
30
Tubi ficidae vs Ephemereliidae -272.2 225.8452 -1.21 1 -1245.512 701.1123
Unionidae vs Ephemereliidae -387.6794 164.3266 -2.36 1 -1095.868 320.5093
Hyalellidae vs Gasterosteidae -88.89999 225.8452 -0.39 1 -1062.212 884.4123
Hydrobi idae vs Gasterosteidae -219.35 225.8452 -0.97 1 -1192.662 753.9623
Hyl idae vs Gasterosteidae -209.055 195.5877 -1.07 1 -1051.968 633.8582
Icta luridae vs Gasterosteidae -139.1 225.8452 -0.62 1 -1112.412 834.2123
Libellulidae vs Gasterosteidae -48.5 225.8452 -0.21 1 -1021.812 924.8123
Limnephilidae vs Gasterosteidae 713 225.8452 3.16 1 -260.3123 1686.312
Lumbriculidae vs Gasterosteidae -62.8 225.8452 -0.28 1 -1036.112 910.5123
Lymnaeidae vs Gasterosteidae -192.88 225.8452 -0.85 1 -1166.192 780.4323
Moronidae vs Gasterosteidae -133.22 178.5463 -0.75 1 -902.6909 636.2509
Naididae vs Gasterosteidae -65 225.8452 -0.29 1 -1038.312 908.3123
Percidae vs Gasterosteidae -192.9267 184.4019 -1.05 1 -987.6328 601.7795
Perlodidae vs Gasterosteidae -89.10001 225.8452 -0.39 1 -1062.412 884.2123
Phys idae vs Gasterosteidae -117 225.8452 -0.52 1 -1090.312 856.3123
Pipidae vs Gasterosteidae -159 225.8452 -0.7 1 -1132.312 814.3123
Planorbidae vs Gasterosteidae -69.89999 225.8452 -0.31 1 -1043.212 903.4123
Pleuroceridae vs Gasterosteidae -212.96 225.8452 -0.94 1 -1186.272 760.3523
Poeci liidae vs Gasterosteidae -134.52 195.5877 -0.69 1 -977.4332 708.3932
Ranidae vs Gasterosteidae -185.12 225.8452 -0.82 1 -1158.432 788.1923
Sa lmonidae vs Gasterosteidae -169.743 167.4913 -1.01 1 -891.5707 552.0847
Sphaeriidae vs Gasterosteidae -192.14 225.8452 -0.85 1 -1165.452 781.1723
Tubi ficidae vs Gasterosteidae -111.3 225.8452 -0.49 1 -1084.612 862.0123
Unionidae vs Gasterosteidae -226.7794 164.3266 -1.38 1 -934.9681 481.4093
Hydrobi idae vs Hyalellidae -130.45 225.8452 -0.58 1 -1103.762 842.8623
Hyl idae vs Hyalellidae -120.155 195.5877 -0.61 1 -963.0682 722.7582
Icta luridae vs Hyalellidae -50.20001 225.8452 -0.22 1 -1023.512 923.1123
Libellulidae vs Hyalellidae 40.39999 225.8452 0.18 1 -932.9123 1013.712
Lumbriculidae vs Hyalellidae 26.09999 225.8452 0.12 1 -947.2123 999.4123
Lymnaeidae vs Hyalellidae -103.98 225.8452 -0.46 1 -1077.292 869.3323
Moronidae vs Hyalellidae -44.32001 178.5463 -0.25 1 -813.7909 725.1509
Naididae vs Hyalellidae 23.89999 225.8452 0.11 1 -949.4123 997.2123
Percidae vs Hyalellidae -104.0267 184.4019 -0.56 1 -898.7328 690.6795
Perlodidae vs Hyalellidae -0.2000122 225.8452 0 1 -973.5123 973.1123
Phys idae vs Hyalellidae -28.10001 225.8452 -0.12 1 -1001.412 945.2123
Pipidae vs Hyalellidae -70.10001 225.8452 -0.31 1 -1043.412 903.2123
Planorbidae vs Hyalellidae 19 225.8452 0.08 1 -954.3123 992.3123
Pleuroceridae vs Hyalellidae -124.06 225.8452 -0.55 1 -1097.372 849.2523
Poeci liidae vs Hyalellidae -45.62 195.5877 -0.23 1 -888.5332 797.2932
OreoHelix Consulting, Moab, UT
Does Phylogeny Predict Sensitivity to Ammonia in Freshwater Animals?
31
Ranidae vs Hyalellidae -96.22001 225.8452 -0.43 1 -1069.532 877.0923
Sa lmonidae vs Hyalellidae -80.84301 167.4913 -0.48 1 -802.6707 640.9847
Sphaeriidae vs Hyalellidae -103.24 225.8452 -0.46 1 -1076.552 870.0723
Tubi ficidae vs Hyalellidae -22.40001 225.8452 -0.1 1 -995.7123 950.9123
Unionidae vs Hyalellidae -137.8794 164.3266 -0.84 1 -846.0681 570.3093
Hyl idae vs Hydrobiidae 10.295 195.5877 0.05 1 -832.6182 853.2082
Icta luridae vs Hydrobiidae 80.24999 225.8452 0.36 1 -893.0623 1053.562
Libellulidae vs Hydrobiidae 170.85 225.8452 0.76 1 -802.4623 1144.162
Lumbriculidae vs Hydrobiidae 156.55 225.8452 0.69 1 -816.7623 1129.862
Lymnaeidae vs Hydrobiidae 26.47 225.8452 0.12 1 -946.8423 999.7823
Moronidae vs Hydrobiidae 86.13 178.5463 0.48 1 -683.3409 855.6009
Naididae vs Hydrobiidae 154.35 225.8452 0.68 1 -818.9623 1127.662
Percidae vs Hydrobiidae 26.42333 184.4019 0.14 1 -768.2828 821.1295
Perlodidae vs Hydrobiidae 130.25 225.8452 0.58 1 -843.0623 1103.562
Phys idae vs Hydrobiidae 102.35 225.8452 0.45 1 -870.9623 1075.662
Pipidae vs Hydrobiidae 60.35 225.8452 0.27 1 -912.9623 1033.662
Planorbidae vs Hydrobiidae 149.45 225.8452 0.66 1 -823.8623 1122.762
Pleuroceridae vs Hydrobiidae 6.389999 225.8452 0.03 1 -966.9223 979.7023
Poeci liidae vs Hydrobiidae 84.83 195.5877 0.43 1 -758.0832 927.7432
Ranidae vs Hydrobiidae 34.23 225.8452 0.15 1 -939.0823 1007.542
Sa lmonidae vs Hydrobiidae 49.607 167.4913 0.3 1 -672.2207 771.4347
Sphaeriidae vs Hydrobiidae 27.21 225.8452 0.12 1 -946.1023 1000.522
Tubi ficidae vs Hydrobiidae 108.05 225.8452 0.48 1 -865.2623 1081.362
Unionidae vs Hydrobiidae -7.429413 164.3266 -0.05 1 -715.6181 700.7593
Icta luridae vs Hylidae 69.95499 195.5877 0.36 1 -772.9582 912.8682
Libellulidae vs Hylidae 160.555 195.5877 0.82 1 -682.3582 1003.468
Lumbriculidae vs Hylidae 146.255 195.5877 0.75 1 -696.6582 989.1682
Lymnaeidae vs Hylidae 16.175 195.5877 0.08 1 -826.7382 859.0882
Moronidae vs Hylidae 75.835 138.3014 0.55 1 -520.1946 671.8646
Naididae vs Hylidae 144.055 195.5877 0.74 1 -698.8582 986.9682
Percidae vs Hylidae 16.12833 145.7825 0.11 1 -612.142 644.3987
Perlodidae vs Hyl idae 119.955 195.5877 0.61 1 -722.9582 962.8682
Phys idae vs Hylidae 92.055 195.5877 0.47 1 -750.8582 934.9682
Pipidae vs Hylidae 50.055 195.5877 0.26 1 -792.8582 892.9682
Planorbidae vs Hyl idae 139.155 195.5877 0.71 1 -703.7582 982.0682
Pleuroceridae vs Hylidae -3.904999 195.5877 -0.02 1 -846.8182 839.0082
Poeci liidae vs Hyl idae 74.535 159.6967 0.47 1 -613.7007 762.7707
Ranidae vs Hylidae 23.935 195.5877 0.12 1 -818.9782 866.8482
Sa lmonidae vs Hylidae 39.312 123.7005 0.32 1 -493.7931 572.4171
OreoHelix Consulting, Moab, UT
Does Phylogeny Predict Sensitivity to Ammonia in Freshwater Animals?
32
Sphaeriidae vs Hyl idae 16.915 195.5877 0.09 1 -825.9982 859.8282
Tubi ficidae vs Hylidae 97.755 195.5877 0.5 1 -745.1582 940.6682
Unionidae vs Hylidae -17.72441 119.3805 -0.15 1 -532.2116 496.7628
Libellulidae vs Ictaluridae 90.60001 225.8452 0.4 1 -882.7123 1063.912
Lumbriculidae vs Ictaluridae 76.3 225.8452 0.34 1 -897.0123 1049.612
Lymnaeidae vs Ictaluridae -53.77999 225.8452 -0.24 1 -1027.092 919.5323
Moronidae vs Ictaluridae 5.880005 178.5463 0.03 1 -763.5909 775.3509
Naididae vs Ictaluridae 74.10001 225.8452 0.33 1 -899.2123 1047.412
Percidae vs Ictaluridae -53.82666 184.4019 -0.29 1 -848.5328 740.8795
Perlodidae vs Ictaluridae 50 225.8452 0.22 1 -923.3123 1023.312
Phys idae vs Ictaluridae 22.10001 225.8452 0.1 1 -951.2123 995.4123
Pipidae vs Ictaluridae -19.89999 225.8452 -0.09 1 -993.2123 953.4123
Planorbidae vs Ictaluridae 69.20001 225.8452 0.31 1 -904.1123 1042.512
Pleuroceridae vs Ictaluridae -73.85999 225.8452 -0.33 1 -1047.172 899.4523
Poeci liidae vs Ictaluridae 4.580009 195.5877 0.02 1 -838.3332 847.4932
Ranidae vs Ictaluridae -46.02 225.8452 -0.2 1 -1019.332 927.2923
Sa lmonidae vs Ictaluridae -30.64299 167.4913 -0.18 1 -752.4707 691.1847
Sphaeriidae vs Ictaluridae -53.03999 225.8452 -0.23 1 -1026.352 920.2723
Tubi ficidae vs Ictaluridae 27.8 225.8452 0.12 1 -945.5123 1001.112
Unionidae vs Ictaluridae -87.67941 164.3266 -0.53 1 -795.8681 620.5093
Limnephilidae vs Libellulidae 761.5 225.8452 3.37 1 -211.8123 1734.812
Lumbriculidae vs Libellulidae -14.3 225.8452 -0.06 1 -987.6123 959.0123
Lymnaeidae vs Libellulidae -144.38 225.8452 -0.64 1 -1117.692 828.9323
Moronidae vs Libellulidae -84.72 178.5463 -0.47 1 -854.1909 684.7509
Naididae vs Libellulidae -16.5 225.8452 -0.07 1 -989.8123 956.8123
Percidae vs Libellulidae -144.4267 184.4019 -0.78 1 -939.1328 650.2795
Perlodidae vs Libellulidae -40.60001 225.8452 -0.18 1 -1013.912 932.7123
Phys idae vs Libellulidae -68.5 225.8452 -0.3 1 -1041.812 904.8123
Pipidae vs Libellulidae -110.5 225.8452 -0.49 1 -1083.812 862.8123
Planorbidae vs Libellulidae -21.39999 225.8452 -0.09 1 -994.7123 951.9123
Pleuroceridae vs Libellulidae -164.46 225.8452 -0.73 1 -1137.772 808.8523
Poeci liidae vs Libellulidae -86.02 195.5877 -0.44 1 -928.9332 756.8932
Ranidae vs Libellulidae -136.62 225.8452 -0.6 1 -1109.932 836.6923
Sa lmonidae vs Libellulidae -121.243 167.4913 -0.72 1 -843.0707 600.5847
Sphaeriidae vs Libellulidae -143.64 225.8452 -0.64 1 -1116.952 829.6723
Tubi ficidae vs Libellulidae -62.8 225.8452 -0.28 1 -1036.112 910.5123
Unionidae vs Libellulidae -178.2794 164.3266 -1.08 1 -886.4681 529.9093
Lymnaeidae vs Lumbriculidae -130.08 225.8452 -0.58 1 -1103.392 843.2323
Moronidae vs Lumbriculidae -70.42 178.5463 -0.39 1 -839.8909 699.0509
OreoHelix Consulting, Moab, UT
Does Phylogeny Predict Sensitivity to Ammonia in Freshwater Animals?
33
Naididae vs Lumbriculidae -2.199997 225.8452 -0.01 1 -975.5123 971.1123
Percidae vs Lumbriculidae -130.1267 184.4019 -0.71 1 -924.8328 664.5795
Perlodidae vs Lumbriculidae -26.3 225.8452 -0.12 1 -999.6123 947.0123
Phys idae vs Lumbriculidae -54.2 225.8452 -0.24 1 -1027.512 919.1123
Pipidae vs Lumbriculidae -96.2 225.8452 -0.43 1 -1069.512 877.1123
Planorbidae vs Lumbriculidae -7.099991 225.8452 -0.03 1 -980.4123 966.2123
Pleuroceridae vs Lumbriculidae -150.16 225.8452 -0.66 1 -1123.472 823.1523
Poeci liidae vs Lumbriculidae -71.71999 195.5877 -0.37 1 -914.6332 771.1932
Ranidae vs Lumbriculidae -122.32 225.8452 -0.54 1 -1095.632 850.9923
Sa lmonidae vs Lumbriculidae -106.943 167.4913 -0.64 1 -828.7707 614.8847
Sphaeriidae vs Lumbriculidae -129.34 225.8452 -0.57 1 -1102.652 843.9723
Tubi ficidae vs Lumbriculidae -48.5 225.8452 -0.21 1 -1021.812 924.8123
Unionidae vs Lumbriculidae -163.9794 164.3266 -1 1 -872.1681 544.2093
Moronidae vs Lymnaeidae 59.66 178.5463 0.33 1 -709.8109 829.1309
Naididae vs Lymnaeidae 127.88 225.8452 0.57 1 -845.4323 1101.192
Percidae vs Lymnaeidae -0.0466715 184.4019 0 1 -794.7528 794.6595
Perlodidae vs Lymnaeidae 103.78 225.8452 0.46 1 -869.5323 1077.092
Phys idae vs Lymnaeidae 75.88 225.8452 0.34 1 -897.4323 1049.192
Pipidae vs Lymnaeidae 33.88 225.8452 0.15 1 -939.4323 1007.192
Planorbidae vs Lymnaeidae 122.98 225.8452 0.54 1 -850.3323 1096.292
Pleuroceridae vs Lymnaeidae -20.08 225.8452 -0.09 1 -993.3923 953.2323
Poeci liidae vs Lymnaeidae 58.36 195.5877 0.3 1 -784.5532 901.2732
Ranidae vs Lymnaeidae 7.759995 225.8452 0.03 1 -965.5523 981.0723
Sa lmonidae vs Lymnaeidae 23.137 167.4913 0.14 1 -698.6907 744.9647
Sphaeriidae vs Lymnaeidae 0.7399979 225.8452 0 1 -972.5723 974.0523
Tubi ficidae vs Lymnaeidae 81.57999 225.8452 0.36 1 -891.7323 1054.892
Unionidae vs Lymnaeidae -33.89941 164.3266 -0.21 1 -742.0881 674.2893
Naididae vs Moronidae 68.22 178.5463 0.38 1 -701.2509 837.6909
Percidae vs Moronidae -59.70667 121.9704 -0.49 1 -585.3554 465.942
Perlodidae vs Moronidae 44.12 178.5463 0.25 1 -725.3509 813.5909
Phys idae vs Moronidae 16.22 178.5463 0.09 1 -753.2509 785.6909
Pipidae vs Moronidae -25.78 178.5463 -0.14 1 -795.2509 743.6909
Planorbidae vs Moronidae 63.32001 178.5463 0.35 1 -706.1509 832.7909
Pleuroceridae vs Moronidae -79.74 178.5463 -0.45 1 -849.2109 689.7309
Poeci liidae vs Moronidae -1.299995 138.3014 -0.01 1 -597.3296 594.7296
Ranidae vs Moronidae -51.9 178.5463 -0.29 1 -821.3709 717.5709
Sa lmonidae vs Moronidae -36.523 94.47784 -0.39 1 -443.6887 370.6427
Sphaeriidae vs Moronidae -58.92 178.5463 -0.33 1 -828.3909 710.5509
Tubi ficidae vs Moronidae 21.92 178.5463 0.12 1 -747.5509 791.3909
OreoHelix Consulting, Moab, UT
Does Phylogeny Predict Sensitivity to Ammonia in Freshwater Animals?
34
Unionidae vs Moronidae -93.55941 88.74648 -1.05 1 -476.025 288.9062
Percidae vs Naididae -127.9267 184.4019 -0.69 1 -922.6328 666.7795
Perlodidae vs Naididae -24.10001 225.8452 -0.11 1 -997.4123 949.2123
Phys idae vs Naididae -52 225.8452 -0.23 1 -1025.312 921.3123
Pipidae vs Naididae -94 225.8452 -0.42 1 -1067.312 879.3123
Planorbidae vs Naididae -4.899994 225.8452 -0.02 1 -978.2123 968.4123
Pleuroceridae vs Naididae -147.96 225.8452 -0.66 1 -1121.272 825.3523
Poeci liidae vs Naididae -69.52 195.5877 -0.36 1 -912.4332 773.3932
Ranidae vs Naididae -120.12 225.8452 -0.53 1 -1093.432 853.1923
Sa lmonidae vs Naididae -104.743 167.4913 -0.63 1 -826.5707 617.0847
Sphaeriidae vs Naididae -127.14 225.8452 -0.56 1 -1100.452 846.1723
Tubi ficidae vs Naididae -46.3 225.8452 -0.21 1 -1019.612 927.0123
Unionidae vs Naididae -161.7794 164.3266 -0.98 1 -869.9681 546.4093
Perlodidae vs Percidae 103.8267 184.4019 0.56 1 -690.8795 898.5328
Phys idae vs Percidae 75.92667 184.4019 0.41 1 -718.7795 870.6328
Pipidae vs Percidae 33.92667 184.4019 0.18 1 -760.7795 828.6328
Planorbidae vs Percidae 123.0267 184.4019 0.67 1 -671.6795 917.7328
Pleuroceridae vs Percidae -20.03333 184.4019 -0.11 1 -814.7395 774.6728
Poeci liidae vs Percidae 58.40667 145.7825 0.4 1 -569.8637 686.677
Ranidae vs Percidae 7.806666 184.4019 0.04 1 -786.8995 802.5128
Sa lmonidae vs Percidae 23.18367 105.1252 0.22 1 -429.8685 476.2359
Sphaeriidae vs Percidae 0.7866694 184.4019 0 1 -793.9195 795.4928
Tubi ficidae vs Percidae 81.62667 184.4019 0.44 1 -713.0795 876.3328
Unionidae vs Percidae -33.85274 100.006 -0.34 1 -464.8427 397.1372
Phys idae vs Perlodidae -27.89999 225.8452 -0.12 1 -1001.212 945.4123
Pipidae vs Perlodidae -69.89999 225.8452 -0.31 1 -1043.212 903.4123
Planorbidae vs Perlodidae 19.20001 225.8452 0.09 1 -954.1123 992.5123
Pleuroceridae vs Perlodidae -123.86 225.8452 -0.55 1 -1097.172 849.4523
Poeci liidae vs Perlodidae -45.41999 195.5877 -0.23 1 -888.3332 797.4932
Ranidae vs Perlodidae -96.02 225.8452 -0.43 1 -1069.332 877.2923
Sa lmonidae vs Perlodidae -80.64299 167.4913 -0.48 1 -802.4707 641.1847
Sphaeriidae vs Perlodidae -103.04 225.8452 -0.46 1 -1076.352 870.2723
Tubi ficidae vs Perlodidae -22.2 225.8452 -0.1 1 -995.5123 951.1123
Unionidae vs Perlodidae -137.6794 164.3266 -0.84 1 -845.8681 570.5093
Pipidae vs Physidae -42 225.8452 -0.19 1 -1015.312 931.3123
Planorbidae vs Phys idae 47.10001 225.8452 0.21 1 -926.2123 1020.412
Pleuroceridae vs Physidae -95.96 225.8452 -0.42 1 -1069.272 877.3523
Poeci liidae vs Phys idae -17.52 195.5877 -0.09 1 -860.4332 825.3932
Ranidae vs Physidae -68.12 225.8452 -0.3 1 -1041.432 905.1923
OreoHelix Consulting, Moab, UT
Does Phylogeny Predict Sensitivity to Ammonia in Freshwater Animals?
35
Salmonidae vs Physidae -52.743 167.4913 -0.31 1 -774.5707 669.0847
Sphaeriidae vs Phys idae -75.14 225.8452 -0.33 1 -1048.452 898.1723
Tubi ficidae vs Physidae 5.699997 225.8452 0.03 1 -967.6123 979.0123
Unionidae vs Physidae -109.7794 164.3266 -0.67 1 -817.9681 598.4093
Planorbidae vs Pipidae 89.10001 225.8452 0.39 1 -884.2123 1062.412
Pleuroceridae vs Pipidae -53.96 225.8452 -0.24 1 -1027.272 919.3523
Poeci liidae vs Pipidae 24.48 195.5877 0.13 1 -818.4332 867.3932
Ranidae vs Pipidae -26.12 225.8452 -0.12 1 -999.4323 947.1923
Sa lmonidae vs Pipidae -10.743 167.4913 -0.06 1 -732.5707 711.0847
Sphaeriidae vs Pipidae -33.14 225.8452 -0.15 1 -1006.452 940.1723
Tubi ficidae vs Pipidae 47.7 225.8452 0.21 1 -925.6123 1021.012
Unionidae vs Pipidae -67.77941 164.3266 -0.41 1 -775.9681 640.4093
Pleuroceridae vs Planorbidae -143.06 225.8452 -0.63 1 -1116.372 830.2523
Poeci liidae vs Planorbidae -64.62 195.5877 -0.33 1 -907.5332 778.2932
Ranidae vs Planorbidae -115.22 225.8452 -0.51 1 -1088.532 858.0923
Sa lmonidae vs Planorbidae -99.84301 167.4913 -0.6 1 -821.6707 621.9847
Sphaeriidae vs Planorbidae -122.24 225.8452 -0.54 1 -1095.552 851.0723
Tubi ficidae vs Planorbidae -41.40001 225.8452 -0.18 1 -1014.712 931.9123
Unionidae vs Planorbidae -156.8794 164.3266 -0.95 1 -865.0681 551.3093
Poeci liidae vs Pleuroceridae 78.44 195.5877 0.4 1 -764.4732 921.3532
Ranidae vs Pleuroceridae 27.84 225.8452 0.12 1 -945.4723 1001.152
Sa lmonidae vs Pleuroceridae 43.217 167.4913 0.26 1 -678.6107 765.0447
Sphaeriidae vs Pleuroceridae 20.82 225.8452 0.09 1 -952.4923 994.1323
Tubi ficidae vs Pleuroceridae 101.66 225.8452 0.45 1 -871.6523 1074.972
Unionidae vs Pleuroceridae -13.81941 164.3266 -0.08 1 -722.0081 694.3693
Ranidae vs Poeciliidae -50.60001 195.5877 -0.26 1 -893.5132 792.3132
Sa lmonidae vs Poeciliidae -35.223 123.7005 -0.28 1 -568.3281 497.8821
Sphaeriidae vs Poeciliidae -57.62 195.5877 -0.29 1 -900.5332 785.2932
Tubi ficidae vs Poeciliidae 23.21999 195.5877 0.12 1 -819.6932 866.1332
Unionidae vs Poeciliidae -92.25941 119.3805 -0.77 1 -606.7466 422.2278
Sa lmonidae vs Ranidae 15.377 167.4913 0.09 1 -706.4507 737.2047
Sphaeriidae vs Ranidae -7.019997 225.8452 -0.03 1 -980.3323 966.2923
Tubi ficidae vs Ranidae 73.82 225.8452 0.33 1 -899.4923 1047.132
Unionidae vs Ranidae -41.65941 164.3266 -0.25 1 -749.8481 666.5293
Sphaeriidae vs Salmonidae -22.397 167.4913 -0.13 1 -744.2247 699.4307
Tubi ficidae vs Salmonidae 58.443 167.4913 0.35 1 -663.3847 780.2707
Unionidae vs Salmonidae -57.03641 63.6434 -0.9 1 -331.3167 217.2439
Tubi ficidae vs Sphaeriidae 80.84 225.8452 0.36 1 -892.4723 1054.152
Unionidae vs Sphaeriidae -34.63941 164.3266 -0.21 1 -742.8281 673.5493
OreoHelix Consulting, Moab, UT
Does Phylogeny Predict Sensitivity to Ammonia in Freshwater Animals?
36
Unionidae vs Tubificidae -115.4794 164.3266 -0.7 1 -823.6681 592.7093