does time spent watching television egan and murray

37
www.growingup.ie Suzanne Egan (MIC, UL) and Aisling Murray (ESRI) Does time spent watching television in early childhood affect socio-emotional development?

Upload: xiejie22590

Post on 05-Jan-2016

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

children and TV

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Does Time Spent Watching Television Egan and Murray

www.growingup.ie

Suzanne Egan (MIC, UL) and

Aisling Murray (ESRI)

Does time spent watching television in early childhood affect socio-emotional development?

Page 2: Does Time Spent Watching Television Egan and Murray

Overview

• Introduction – Television and screen time use in children – Effects of television watching on children

• Current Study

– Effects of television watching on socio-emotional development in Irish 3 year olds

• Conclusions

Page 3: Does Time Spent Watching Television Egan and Murray

Introduction Prevalence of televisions

• It has become the norm for there to be multiple television

sets per household.

• Over two-thirds of families surveyed by the Broadcasting Commission of Ireland in 2008 had more than one television set.

• Many of these additional televisions are in childrens’ bedrooms which may mean a lack of parental control over programme content.

Page 4: Does Time Spent Watching Television Egan and Murray

Introduction Prevalence of a television in child’s own bedroom

• 22% of 3-4 year olds (Ofcom, 2013)

• Nearly 25% of 4 – 7 year olds (BCI, 2008)

• 37% of 5-7 year olds (Ofcom, 2013)

• 41% of 5 year olds (Mistry et al, 2007 – American data)

• 45% of 9 year olds (Williams et al, 2009 – GUI data)

Page 5: Does Time Spent Watching Television Egan and Murray

Introduction Amount of television watched • American Academy of Pediatrics recommends no more

than 1-2 hours per day for children aged 2 and over.

• Two thirds of Irish 9 year olds spent 1-3 hours per weekday during term time (Williams et al, 2009)

• This time may increase at weekends (Quail et al., 2013)

Page 6: Does Time Spent Watching Television Egan and Murray

Introduction • Pagani et al. (2010) examined data from children aged

29 months and then again at 53 months from the Quebec Longitudinal Study

• Those aged 29 months watched an average of 8.82 hours tv per week,

• Those aged 53 months watched an average of 14.85 hours tv per week

• 11% at 29 months and 23% at 53 months view more than 2 hrs per day

Page 7: Does Time Spent Watching Television Egan and Murray

Introduction • Jago et al. (2013) examined the viewing habits of 3-5 year

old preschool children and their parents in the UK.

• Two thirds of preschool children and three quarters of parents watched two or more hours of tv per day.

• If the parent watched two or more hours per day then the child was more than 5 times likely to do the same.

• However, increased self efficacy of the parent to limit screen time was associated with a 77% reduction in the likelihood to watch 2 hours + per day

Page 8: Does Time Spent Watching Television Egan and Murray

Introduction Factors associated with increased television watching

• Hoyos et al (2010) reviewed 71 studies of media use among children aged 7 and under.

• Factors associated with increased screen-time were – lower parental education - non-White ethnicity – maternal depression -higher parental body mass – high levels of family television viewing - fewer parental rules

• Environmental factors included – increased access to media equipment (positive association) – perceived safety of the neighbourhood (negative association)

Page 9: Does Time Spent Watching Television Egan and Murray

Introduction Effects of watching television

• Watching television has been associated with effects on

physical, cognitive and socio-emotional development

• Many of the effects are negative but some are positive. Few are very clear cut

• The amount and content of what is being watched seems to be important

Page 10: Does Time Spent Watching Television Egan and Murray

Introduction Physical development

• The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) in the UK found links between watching television and obesity (Reilly et al, 2006).

• 3-year-olds who spent 4-8 hours per week were 37% more likely to be obese at age 7 years than those who watched less than four hours.

• Those with more than 8 hours of viewing were 55% more likely (potentially confounding variables family characteristics and lifestyle factors were controlled for).

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Overall effects are negative and association seems to be clear and well established
Page 11: Does Time Spent Watching Television Egan and Murray

Introduction • Quebec Longitudinal Study - increased television

exposure at age 29 months was associated with (Pagani et al, 2010) – increases in BMI at age 10 years – decreased physical activity – higher consumption of soft drinks and snacks

• A systematic review of papers on the topic of television

viewing and BMI in pre-school children (i.e. aged 2-6 years) found that 23 of the 26 papers included reported evidence of a positive association (Cox et al, 2012).

Page 12: Does Time Spent Watching Television Egan and Murray

Introduction Cognitive development

• Many studies have looked at the effect of television

watching on attention and on language

• Effects are mixed

Page 13: Does Time Spent Watching Television Egan and Murray

Introduction Attention • Swing et al., (2010) examined children in middle

childhood.

• Concluded that television and video game exposure was associated with the development of attention problems

• Suggest the pattern is less clear in young children however.

Page 14: Does Time Spent Watching Television Egan and Murray

Introduction • Anderson & Pempek (2005) distinguish between

background and foreground television in young children.

• Foreground television is designed for them and children pay attention to it.

• Background television is not designed for them and they do not attend to it overtly.

• However, toddlers spend less time in focused play and more time in unfocused movement around the room than when the tv is not on.

Page 15: Does Time Spent Watching Television Egan and Murray

Introduction Language: • Linebarger & Walker (2005) report a longitudinal study of

51 children.

• TV use was recorded by parents every 3 months from age 6 months to age 30 months

• Some types of programmes supported language development (e.g., Dora the Explorer, Blue’s Clue’s)

Page 16: Does Time Spent Watching Television Egan and Murray

Introduction • Chonchaiya & Pruksananonda (2008) report on Thai children

aged 15-48 months (56 with language delay and 110 with normally developing language).

• Children with language delays started watching tv earlier than normal children (7 months vs 12 months) and also spent more time per day watching (3 hrs vs 1.2 hrs).

• Those that watched before 12 months and for more than 2 hrs per day were 6 times more likely to have language delay.

• Most of the programme content was not educational.

Page 17: Does Time Spent Watching Television Egan and Murray

Introduction Socio-emotional development

• Much research has focused on violence and tv

• In their review Comstock and Scharrer (2006) note the

evidence supports a clear link between exposure to violent media content and behaviour in children and adolescents

• US Surgeon General reports (1972, 1982, 2001) conclude that there is a causal link between watching violence on television and subsequent violent behaviour.

Page 18: Does Time Spent Watching Television Egan and Murray

Introduction

• UK’s Millennium Cohort Study

• Parkes et al. (2013) examined the link between daily hours of watching television and playing electronic games at age 5 years, and emotional well-being and behaviour at age 7 years.

• Used the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (also used by GUI)

Page 19: Does Time Spent Watching Television Egan and Murray

Introduction • Three or more hours per day was associated with higher

(i.e., worse) scores on all the problem sub-scales of the SDQ – conduct problems – hyperactivity/inattention – emotional symptoms – peer problems

• Also poorer scores on the pro-social scale, when the models were adjusted for gender and age in months at follow-up.

Page 20: Does Time Spent Watching Television Egan and Murray

Introduction • The negative effect of screen-time on conduct problems

remained statistically significant when adjustment was made for a wide range of other variables: – socio-demographic factors – maternal characteristics – measures of family functioning – other child characteristics such as cognitive ability and sleeping

difficulties

• Higher exposure to screen-time may be a proxy for other characteristics that are the main driver of poor behavioural outcomes or alternatively one mediates the other

Page 21: Does Time Spent Watching Television Egan and Murray

Introduction

• Similarly, a Scottish study (Hamer et al, 2009) found that, cross-sectionally, three hours or more of screen entertainment was associated with worse scores on the SDQ measure among children aged 4-12 years and was robust to: – a range of socio-demographic characteristics – medical conditions – diet – activity measures

Page 22: Does Time Spent Watching Television Egan and Murray

Introduction • However, there can be socio-emotional benefits to

screen-time (and negative effects can be diminished).

• Christakis et al. (2013) conducted a home-based intervention to replace aggressive and violent media content with pro-social and educational content without reducing the total amount of screen-time in 3-5 year olds.

• Found improvement in the externalising behaviour and social competence, but not internalising behaviour.

Page 23: Does Time Spent Watching Television Egan and Murray

Current Study Aim

• To investigate the effect of television on socio-emotional

development in Irish 3 year olds.

• Families of 11,100 children were interviewed in 2008/2009 when the Study Child was nine months old and then re-interviewed in 2011 when the children were three years old (subsequent follow up at 5 years old).

• Completed a number of different measures.

Page 24: Does Time Spent Watching Television Egan and Murray

Current Study Variables of interest used in analysis • Time spent watching television per day (parent report)

• Rules about television (parent report)

• Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)

– 5 subscales: Prosocial, Emotional, Conduct, Hyperactivity, Peer Problems

• Demographic variables (e.g., SES, Parental education

levels)

Page 25: Does Time Spent Watching Television Egan and Murray

Descriptives • Mean time spent watching

television per day was 112 mins

• Most frequent category was between 1 and 2 hours

• 27% watched TV for more than 2 hours

• 85% of families had rules about what child could watch

• 16% of 3-year-olds had a TV, computer or games console in their bedroom

12

25

37

16

11

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

30 mins or under

31 - 60 mins 61-120 mins 121- 180 mins

180 mins plus

% o

f 5-y

ear-

olds

Page 26: Does Time Spent Watching Television Egan and Murray

Effect of screen time on SDQ scores

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

8.00

9.00

10.00

30 mins or under

31 - 60 mins 61-120 mins 121- 180 mins 180 mins plus

Screen time per day

SDQ Prosocial subscale

SDQ Total difficulties score

Longer periods of television associated with higher (worse) behaviour scores

Presenter
Presentation Notes
3-year-olds who watch the most television per day (more than 180 mins/3 hours) have higher scores on the SDQ total difficulties and lower scores on the pro-social scale
Page 27: Does Time Spent Watching Television Egan and Murray

Effect of screen time on SDQ scores

Also associated with worse scores on each of the individual problem subscales

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

4.00

30 mins or under 31 - 60 mins 61-120 mins 121- 180 mins 180 mins plus

SDQ Emotional subscale

SDQ Conduct subscale

SDQ Hyperactivity subscale

SDQ Peer problems subscale

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Same trend observed in relation to each of the problem subscales, although note that lowest category (30 mins and under) is sometimes higher than the intermediate categories
Page 28: Does Time Spent Watching Television Egan and Murray

Problem of confounding variables

However, both longer screen time and high SDQ scores associated with other measures of SES disadvantage such as lower parental education

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

Lower secondary or less

Leaving Cert Certficate/Diploma Degree

Mea

n SD

Q to

tal d

iffic

ultie

s sco

re

Mea

n sc

reen

tim

e m

inut

es

Screen time (minutes) SDQ Total Difficulties

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Primary Caregiver education gradient observed for both screen time minutes per day (blue bars, left axis – first click) and SDQ total difficulties score (red line, right axis – second click). Nearly 40 mins difference in daily screen time between children of lowest and highest educated and over 2 points difference in total SDQ score (about half a SD).
Page 29: Does Time Spent Watching Television Egan and Murray

Problem of confounding variables

Lowest parental education has highest likelihood of being in longest screen time category

21

14

8

6

0

5

10

15

20

25

Lower secondary or less Leaving Cert Certficate/Diploma Degree

% w

atch

ing

mor

e th

an 1

80 m

ins p

er d

ay

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Low parental education also associated with greatest risk of the longest television – 21% of children whose PCG had least education watched more than 3 hours per day compared to just 6% of children whose PCG had a degree or higher (note: difficult to completely discount issue of social desirability)
Page 30: Does Time Spent Watching Television Egan and Murray

Other potential confounders

Temperament measures at 9 months

fussy-difficult

subscale of ICQ unadaptable

subscale of ICQ unpredictable

subscale of ICQ

Measures at 3 years

Screen time per day (mins)

.06*** .07*** .04***

SDQ Total difficulties score

.25*** .16*** .17***

• Which comes first? Are children with socio-emotional/behavioural problems more likely to choose to watch more television?

• Infant temperament measured at age 9 months using the Infant Characteristics Questionnaire (i.e. ‘fussy-difficult’, ‘unadaptable’ and ‘unpredictable’)

• All three infant scales significantly correlated with later measures of screen time and SDQ total difficulties score at age 3 years

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Relationship between screen time and behaviour may be confounded by the tendency for children who already have some problems opting to watch more television. Longitudinally we some associations between temperament as measured at 9 months (parent report) and later behaviour/SE problems as well as between infant temperament and amount of screen time at age 3 years (correlations quite weak but statistically significant).
Page 31: Does Time Spent Watching Television Egan and Murray

Developing a model • Important to control for potential confounding variables

when examining cross-sectional relationship between screen time and socio-emotional development/behaviour

• Model structure – Dependent variable = SDQ total difficulties score (also subscale

scores) – Screen time per day in categories (ref: more than 180 mins) – Controls for whether or not family has rules about TV watching,

PCG education, child gender, low birth weight, family structure, English as first language, infant temperament

Page 32: Does Time Spent Watching Television Egan and Murray

SDQ total difficulties

-1.18

-0.87

-2.36

-1.47

-2.00

-1.34

-1.58

-1.20

-3

-2.5

-2

-1.5

-1

-0.5

0

Model 1: Only screen time Full model

30 mins or under 31 - 60 mins 61-120 mins 121- 180 mins

All shorter durations of screen time have lower SDQ total difficulties scores in comparison to the ‘greater than 180 minutes reference category’

Presenter
Presentation Notes
All shorter durations of screen time have lower SDQ total difficulties scores in comparison to the ‘greater than 180 minutes reference category’. Cluster on left (model 1) shows model with only screen time entered. The differences are attenuated by the inclusion of the controls in the full model (right hand cluster) but all categories remain significantly lower than the more than 180 ref.
Page 33: Does Time Spent Watching Television Egan and Murray

SDQ prosocial scale 0.31 0.31

0.23 0.24

0.20 0.22

0.14 0.15

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

Model 1: Only screen time Full model

30 mins or under 31 - 60 mins 61-120 mins 121- 180 mins

Similar pattern observed for prosocial scale (less screen time associated with higher scores) but little change between initial and final models

Presenter
Presentation Notes
All shorter screen time categories have higher pro-social scales and those differences are not affected by the inclusion of controls in the final model
Page 34: Does Time Spent Watching Television Egan and Murray

SDQ problem scales

-0.50

-0.45

-0.40

-0.35

-0.30

-0.25

-0.20

-0.15

-0.10

-0.05

0.00

SDQ Emotional subscale SDQ Conduct subscale SDQ Hyperactivity subscale

SDQ Peer problems subscale

30 mins or under 31 - 60 mins 61-120 mins 121- 180 mins

Same trends observed for all individual problem subscales as for total difficulties score – particularly pronounced for ‘peer problems’

Presenter
Presentation Notes
All individual problem subscales show the same trend as total difficulties score: i.e. Shorter screen time durations have lower problem scores than the ‘more than 180 mins’ ref category. Final models only for each subscale are shown. Note that difference between ‘under 30’ and ref ‘more than 180’ not significantly different in Emotional and Hyperactivity subscales
Page 35: Does Time Spent Watching Television Egan and Murray

Summary of results • 3-year-olds who watched more than 3 hours (180 mins)

of television per day had worse scores on each of the individual SDQ problem scales, the total difficulties score and the prosocial scale

• With some minor exceptions these differences were robust to controls for measures of SES disadvantage, infant temperament and other factors

• However, screen time explains only a small percentage of the variance in the SDQ score – Just 2% of total SDQ total difficulties score in isolation; full model

accounted for 14%

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Note biggest contributor to SDQ total score variance was infant temperament (6.3%). Screen time only explanation for prosocial scale was less than 0.5%, 4% in total model. For subscales – Emotional: 1%/6%; Conduct: 1%/8%; Hyper: 1%/9%; Peer problems: 2%/6%
Page 36: Does Time Spent Watching Television Egan and Murray

Limitations • Cross-sectional relationship (for now)

• No measure of content

– except for whether or not there are family rules and TV in bedroom

• At 3 years, questions refer just to television watching

– However, research elsewhere suggests this is the primary screen time for children in this age group

• Cannot control for social desirability effects in

responding

Page 37: Does Time Spent Watching Television Egan and Murray

Conclusions • There are some negative effects of watching television on

socio-emotional development in 3 year olds.

• The more television that is watched the greater the negative effects.

• Ideally, will examine effect of screen time at 3 years on SDQ scores at age 5 years.

• Television watching is highly amenable to intervention.

• Important that parents set rules about the amount and content of television viewing.