dominance of competence in member selection under dilemma situation
DESCRIPTION
Dominance of Competence in Member Selection under Dilemma Situation. Lestin , Y. H. Lee, Winton, W. T. Au, & Fion , W. K. Law The Chinese University of Hong Kong Aug 2009 13 th ICSD @ Kyoto. Two universal factors. Two universal factors Warmth, honest, etc, termed as morality aspect - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Dominance of Competence in Member Selection under Dilemma Situation](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081516/56814d0b550346895dba43e9/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Dominance of Competence in Member Selection under Dilemma Situation
Lestin, Y. H. Lee, Winton, W. T. Au, & Fion, W. K. Law
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Aug 2009 13th ICSD @ Kyoto
![Page 2: Dominance of Competence in Member Selection under Dilemma Situation](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081516/56814d0b550346895dba43e9/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Two universal factors• Two universal factors
1. Warmth, honest, etc, termed as morality aspect
2. Clever, skillful, etc, termed as competence aspect
• Similar with might vs morality distinction• Assumption
– The two aspects summarize the types of information in social dilemma
![Page 3: Dominance of Competence in Member Selection under Dilemma Situation](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081516/56814d0b550346895dba43e9/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Morality vs CompetenceWhich factor is more influential?From impression formation research
Morality importance hypothesis (Bruin & Van Lange, 2000)
Morality > Competence
![Page 4: Dominance of Competence in Member Selection under Dilemma Situation](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081516/56814d0b550346895dba43e9/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Morality vs Competence• Goal dependent (Wojciszke, 1998)
– Morality related goal or impression formation• Morality more influential
– Competence related goal • Competence more influential
• Is social dilemma a morality-related or competence-related context?
![Page 5: Dominance of Competence in Member Selection under Dilemma Situation](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081516/56814d0b550346895dba43e9/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Aim of the current researchTo compare the importance of morality and
competence information in member selection under social dilemma context
![Page 6: Dominance of Competence in Member Selection under Dilemma Situation](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081516/56814d0b550346895dba43e9/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
• 303 participants
• 14-26 players
• 10 course scenario games
• Project vs Examination
• Time as resource
6 9
Group Project(Cooperation)
Individual Examination (Defection)
12
Method – experimental setup
![Page 7: Dominance of Competence in Member Selection under Dilemma Situation](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081516/56814d0b550346895dba43e9/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
• 2 Tasks– Form group– Allocate
timeAnonymity2
informationResourceCooperation
Rate
Number of hours available (Resource represent competence) 6912
Average allocation ratio (Cooperation Rate represent morality)
0 – 100%
![Page 8: Dominance of Competence in Member Selection under Dilemma Situation](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081516/56814d0b550346895dba43e9/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
HH: 9 hrs.
H: (38%)
H: 9 hrs.
(38%)No info Resources info Cooperation info Both info
120 seconds to select members
![Page 9: Dominance of Competence in Member Selection under Dilemma Situation](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081516/56814d0b550346895dba43e9/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
DV - popularity
Popularity = 50% Popularity = 100%
![Page 10: Dominance of Competence in Member Selection under Dilemma Situation](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081516/56814d0b550346895dba43e9/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Key findingsPrediction of popularity when both information displayed
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 30
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
Cooperation Rate
Resource
Standardize value of the corresponding variables (zCR/zRes)
Popu
lari
ty Slope=0.05
Slope=0.10
![Page 11: Dominance of Competence in Member Selection under Dilemma Situation](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081516/56814d0b550346895dba43e9/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
IQ: 200 IQ: 100
IQ: 200 IQ: 100 Criminal history No
criminal history
IQ: 200 IQ: 100 Gender: Male Gender:
Female
![Page 12: Dominance of Competence in Member Selection under Dilemma Situation](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081516/56814d0b550346895dba43e9/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Effect of Cooperation Rate in CR only and Both condition
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 30
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Cooperation Rate Only
Both Condition
Standardized Cooperation Rate
Popu
lari
ty
Slope=0.09
Slope=0.05
![Page 13: Dominance of Competence in Member Selection under Dilemma Situation](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081516/56814d0b550346895dba43e9/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Effect of Resource in Res Only and Both Condition
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 30
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
Resource Only
Both Condition
Standardized Resource
Pop
ula
rity
Slope=0.097
Slope=0.09
![Page 14: Dominance of Competence in Member Selection under Dilemma Situation](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081516/56814d0b550346895dba43e9/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Potential concerns
![Page 15: Dominance of Competence in Member Selection under Dilemma Situation](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081516/56814d0b550346895dba43e9/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Concern 1Resource x Cooperation Rate = expected
resource allocationSingle combinatory effect or 2 separate effect?
Regression show that the interaction term of resource x cooperation rate was n.s. t(2556) = -.12, p = .91
![Page 16: Dominance of Competence in Member Selection under Dilemma Situation](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081516/56814d0b550346895dba43e9/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Concern 2Resource and Cooperate rate measured in
different scaleResource: discrete, 6, 9 12Cooperation Rate: continuous, 0-100%
Cooperation Rate not manipulatedAlternative explanation
![Page 17: Dominance of Competence in Member Selection under Dilemma Situation](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081516/56814d0b550346895dba43e9/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Concern 2A follow-up to eliminate this alternativeSame scenarioOnly member selectionThe target to be selected are artificial targetsResource and Cooperation Rate
Measure in same scale (0-100)Counterbalanced and manipulated
![Page 18: Dominance of Competence in Member Selection under Dilemma Situation](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081516/56814d0b550346895dba43e9/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
![Page 19: Dominance of Competence in Member Selection under Dilemma Situation](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081516/56814d0b550346895dba43e9/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Concern 2Counterbalance by Mirrored target
Resource = 30 hr, Cooperation Rate = 60%Resource = 60 hr, Cooperation Rate = 30%
Mirrored targets with more resource was selected more frequently than targets with higher cooperation rate
Preferred target # of participants
Higher Resource 37
Higher Cooperation Rate 13
No Preference 4
![Page 20: Dominance of Competence in Member Selection under Dilemma Situation](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081516/56814d0b550346895dba43e9/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Concern 3Maybe our scenario is special!
We collected impression rating using the second paradigm (artificial targets)
![Page 21: Dominance of Competence in Member Selection under Dilemma Situation](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081516/56814d0b550346895dba43e9/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
CR Res
Target Type
Sta
ndar
dize
d sc
ore
Behavoiral Choice
Impression Rating
Pop
ula
rity
![Page 22: Dominance of Competence in Member Selection under Dilemma Situation](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081516/56814d0b550346895dba43e9/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
ConclusionCompetence
More influential in member selectionLess affected by the existence of Morality
informationThe effect is
Not due to the combinatory nature of cooperation rate and resource
Not because we used different scaleNot because our scenario is special
![Page 23: Dominance of Competence in Member Selection under Dilemma Situation](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081516/56814d0b550346895dba43e9/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
ConclusionCompetence affect people’s decision stronger
than morality information in selecting member under social dilemma situation