doreen primary school (945) · - ... in 2010, only the beginning prep assessment had taken place....
TRANSCRIPT
2010 School Level ReportDoreen Primary School (945)
Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD
Please check the data in this report. If, after comparing it with your own records, youdeem it to be incorrect or incomplete, follow the directions on the following website:
- http://www.education.vic.gov.au/management/schoolimprovement/performancedatathen select 'School Performance Reports'.
Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD
Contents
Page No.
Privacy 3
SFO Density and LBOTE 4
English Online Interview - Reading 5
- Writing 6
- Speaking and Listening 7
Assessment of Reading Prep to Year 2 8-9
Teacher Judgments against the VELS 10-18
NAPLAN - Reading 19
- Writing 20
- Numeracy 21
AIM - Reading 22
- Mathematics 23
Teacher Assessment of Student Progress (PSD students) 24-25
ESL Companion Guide 26
Enrolment 27
Student Absence 28
Opinion Surveys - Parent 29
- Staff 30
Performance & Development Culture 31
Staff Sick Leave 32
Bank Balances 33
Produced by Data, Outcomesand Evaluation Division, DEECD Page 2 of 33
It is important to note that information that identifies an individual or can be used with other readily available information to identify a person is now protected by the Information Privacy Act 2000 (http://www.education.vic.gov.au/about/deptpolicies/informationprivacy.htm ).
Where the School Level Report is provided to school council members as part of any annual reporting process, or used for discussion on a school’s performance, such as in consultation with the school community in the school self-evaluation process, it is important to remind school community members of their duty to only use this information for the purpose it was provided, and that the material must be kept confidential.
Privacy
When reporting on the school's performance to the school community, care must be taken to avoid the disclosure of information that can directly or indirectly identify an individual. This may be a particular issue when reporting on the achievement of specific cohorts of students or the opinions of staff where there are small numbers.
In situations where privacy cannot be assured, schools may wish to report on the mean result or provide a written comment on school, year level or cohort performance.
Produced by Data, Outcomesand Evaluation Division, DEECD Page 3 of 33
SFO Density and LBOTESchool no: 945
School name: Doreen Primary School
Explanation: This page contains the school's SFO (Student Family Occupation) density^, LBOTE (Language Back-
ground Other Than English) proportion* and Stability rate† (a measure of student population stability).
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010SFO density^: 0.20 0.34 0.28 0.38 0.38 0.37 0.36
LBOTE proportion*: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Stability rate†: 70.6%
School's 2010 SFO density and LBOTE proportion against that of all other government schools
School's SFO^ percentile range^^ over time
School stability rate as percentile
Notes: ^ The higher the SFO density, the lower the SFO percentileand the lower the socio-economic status (SES^^ The school's SFO percentile range shows this school's SFO percentile +/- 10%.* From 2007, a student is LBOTE if either the student or one parent/guardian speaks a language other than English at home.
Prior to 2007, a student is LBOTE if the student or one of the parents was born in a non-English speaking country.† NAPLAN matched-cohort data is used to calculate the stability rate. Using 2010 stability as an example, the formula is:
no. of unique students at both yr3 (2008) and yr5 (2010)sum of unique students at yr3 (2008) and yr5 (2010)
Doreen Primary School
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 0.85 0.9 0.95 1
SF
O d
ensi
ty
LBOTE proportion
0 20 40 60 80 100
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Wh
ole
Sch
ool
percentileSFO ̂percentile range^^
0 20 40 60 80 100
2010
percentileSchool stability as percentile
Produced by Data, Outcomesand Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 4/03/2011Page 4 of 33
English Online Interview (EOI): Reading Table 1: Definition of EOI groups
School no:School name: Doreen Primary SchoolSource of data: English Online Interview application.Explanation: The English Online Interview is an assessment program that takes
the form of an interview between a teacher and a student, with responses being
945 Beginning Prep / UngradedVELS score >= 2.1
VELS score = 1.6 to 2.0
VELS score = 1.1 to 1.5
VELS score = 0.6 to 1.0
VELS score = 0.1 to 0.5
VELS 0 (b tt f l )
End Prep>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 6 months below expected
6-12 months below expected
b tt f l
End Year 1>24 mths above expected
12-24 mths above expected
up to 12 mths above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-18 mths below expected
18 th b l t d
End Year 2>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-24 months below expected
24 th b l t d
EOI group 6:
EOI group 5:
EOI group 4:
EOI group 3:
EOI group 2:
EOI 1
Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 4/03/2011Page 5 of 33
, p grecorded by the teacher in an online system. It was used for assessment ofPrep-Year 2 students in Victorian government schools from October 2009*.
Beginning Prep End Prep End Year 1 End Year 2
participation participation participation participation
(n) (%)† 1 2 3 4 5 6 School State (n) (%)† 1 2 3 4 5 6 School State (n) (%)† 1 2 3 4 5 6 School State (n) (%)† 1 2 3 4 5 6 School State2009 18 100 0 0 11 6 17 67 2 36 1 23 22 100 0 5 32 27 23 14 1 81 1 77 8 100 0 0 0 25 50 25 2 84 2 24
student student Mean VELS Score
Mean VELS Score
Percent of studentsby EOI group
Percent of studentsby EOI group
student Mean VELS Score
Percent of studentsby EOI group
student Mean VELS Score
Percent of studentsby EOI group
Beginning Prep / UngradedVELS score >= 2.1
VELS score = 1.6 to 2.0
VELS score = 1.1 to 1.5
VELS score = 0.6 to 1.0
VELS score = 0.1 to 0.5
VELS score = 0 (bottom of scale)
End Prep>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 6 months below expected
6-12 months below expected
bottom of scale
End Year 1>24 mths above expected
12-24 mths above expected
up to 12 mths above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-18 mths below expected
>18 mths below expected
End Year 2>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-24 months below expected
>24 months below expected
EOI group 6:
EOI group 5:
EOI group 4:
EOI group 3:
EOI group 2:
EOI group 1:
2009 18 100 0 0 11 6 17 67 2.36 1.23 22 100 0 5 32 27 23 14 1.81 1.77 8 100 0 0 0 25 50 25 2.84 2.242010 18 100 6 61 33 0 0 0 0.5 0.4
Percent of student by EOI group School Mean as percentile against Beginning Prep End Prep End Year 1 End Year 2 Ungraded SFO percentile range**
p
100100 100 100 2009
2010
100
Beginning Prep / UngradedVELS score >= 2.1
VELS score = 1.6 to 2.0
VELS score = 1.1 to 1.5
VELS score = 0.6 to 1.0
VELS score = 0.1 to 0.5
VELS score = 0 (bottom of scale)
End Prep>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 6 months below expected
6-12 months below expected
bottom of scale
End Year 1>24 mths above expected
12-24 mths above expected
up to 12 mths above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-18 mths below expected
>18 mths below expected
End Year 2>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-24 months below expected
>24 months below expected
EOI group 6:
EOI group 5:
EOI group 4:
EOI group 3:
EOI group 2:
EOI group 1:
Note: In 2010, only the Beginning Prep assessment had taken place.
B
eg
inn
ing
Pre
p
0
20
40
60
80
100
perc
ent
40
60
80
100
perc
ent
0
20
40
60
80
100
perc
ent
0
20
40
60
80
100
perc
ent 0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
percentile40
60
80
100
perc
ent
Beginning Prep / UngradedVELS score >= 2.1
VELS score = 1.6 to 2.0
VELS score = 1.1 to 1.5
VELS score = 0.6 to 1.0
VELS score = 0.1 to 0.5
VELS score = 0 (bottom of scale)
End Prep>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 6 months below expected
6-12 months below expected
bottom of scale
End Year 1>24 mths above expected
12-24 mths above expected
up to 12 mths above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-18 mths below expected
>18 mths below expected
End Year 2>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-24 months below expected
>24 months below expected
EOI group 6:
EOI group 5:
EOI group 4:
EOI group 3:
EOI group 2:
EOI group 1:
Note: In 2010, only the Beginning Prep assessment had taken place.
U d d t d t ti i ti ( )
En
d P
rep
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
percentile
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
Beginning Prep / UngradedVELS score >= 2.1
VELS score = 1.6 to 2.0
VELS score = 1.1 to 1.5
VELS score = 0.6 to 1.0
VELS score = 0.1 to 0.5
VELS score = 0 (bottom of scale)
End Prep>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 6 months below expected
6-12 months below expected
bottom of scale
End Year 1>24 mths above expected
12-24 mths above expected
up to 12 mths above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-18 mths below expected
>18 mths below expected
End Year 2>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-24 months below expected
>24 months below expected
EOI group 6:
EOI group 5:
EOI group 4:
EOI group 3:
EOI group 2:
EOI group 1:
Note: In 2010, only the Beginning Prep assessment had taken place.
Ungraded student participation (n)= 0
School Mean against State Mean Beginning Prep End Prep End Year 1 End Year 2 Ungraded**
Y
ea
r 1
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
100
3.5
4.0
.
100
3.5
4.0
.
100
3.5
4.0
.
100
3.5
4.0
.
0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
percentile
2009
2010
0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
percentile
%EOI group 1^ %EOI group 2^ %EOI group 3^ %EOI group 4 %EOI group 5 %EOI group 6
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
3.5
4.0
Beginning Prep / UngradedVELS score >= 2.1
VELS score = 1.6 to 2.0
VELS score = 1.1 to 1.5
VELS score = 0.6 to 1.0
VELS score = 0.1 to 0.5
VELS score = 0 (bottom of scale)
End Prep>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 6 months below expected
6-12 months below expected
bottom of scale
End Year 1>24 mths above expected
12-24 mths above expected
up to 12 mths above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-18 mths below expected
>18 mths below expected
End Year 2>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-24 months below expected
>24 months below expected
EOI group 6:
EOI group 5:
EOI group 4:
EOI group 3:
EOI group 2:
EOI group 1:
Note: In 2010, only the Beginning Prep assessment had taken place.
E
nd
Y2
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
25
50
75
100
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
ent s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
.
mea
n V
ELS
sco
re
25
50
75
100
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
cent
stu
dent
par
ticip
atio
n .
mea
n V
ELS
sco
re
25
50
75
100
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
cent
stu
dent
par
ticip
atio
n .
mea
n V
ELS
sco
re
25
50
75
100
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
ent s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
.
mea
n V
ELS
sco
re
0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
percentile
0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
percentile
2009
2010
0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
percentile
%EOI group 1^ %EOI group 2^ %EOI group 3^ %EOI group 4 %EOI group 5 %EOI group 6
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
mea
n V
ELS
sco
re
Beginning Prep / UngradedVELS score >= 2.1
VELS score = 1.6 to 2.0
VELS score = 1.1 to 1.5
VELS score = 0.6 to 1.0
VELS score = 0.1 to 0.5
VELS score = 0 (bottom of scale)
End Prep>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 6 months below expected
6-12 months below expected
bottom of scale
End Year 1>24 mths above expected
12-24 mths above expected
up to 12 mths above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-18 mths below expected
>18 mths below expected
End Year 2>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-24 months below expected
>24 months below expected
EOI group 6:
EOI group 5:
EOI group 4:
EOI group 3:
EOI group 2:
EOI group 1:
Note: In 2010, only the Beginning Prep assessment had taken place.
Note: * In 2010, only the Beginning Prep assessment had taken place.† % t d t ti i ti ( t d t h ti i t d / F b A t l t ) * 100
E
nd
Ye
ar
2
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
0
25
50
75
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009 2010
perc
ent s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
.
mea
n V
ELS
sco
re
0
25
50
75
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009 2010
perc
ent s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
.
mea
n V
ELS
sco
re
0
25
50
75
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009 2010
perc
ent s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
.
mea
n V
ELS
sco
re
State Mean Score
Student Participation†
0
25
50
75
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009 2010
perc
ent s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
.
mea
n V
ELS
sco
re
0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
percentile
0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
percentile
0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
percentile
School Mean as percentile
SFO Percentile range
0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
percentile
%EOI group 1^ %EOI group 2^ %EOI group 3^ %EOI group 4 %EOI group 5 %EOI group 6
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009 2010m
ean
VE
LS s
core
School Mean Score
Beginning Prep / UngradedVELS score >= 2.1
VELS score = 1.6 to 2.0
VELS score = 1.1 to 1.5
VELS score = 0.6 to 1.0
VELS score = 0.1 to 0.5
VELS score = 0 (bottom of scale)
End Prep>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 6 months below expected
6-12 months below expected
bottom of scale
End Year 1>24 mths above expected
12-24 mths above expected
up to 12 mths above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-18 mths below expected
>18 mths below expected
End Year 2>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-24 months below expected
>24 months below expected
EOI group 6:
EOI group 5:
EOI group 4:
EOI group 3:
EOI group 2:
EOI group 1:
Note: In 2010, only the Beginning Prep assessment had taken place.
† % student participation = (students who participated / February or August census enrolments) * 100.** Percentiles and state means are not applicable for the ungraded cohort.^ EOI group definitions vary by year level. Refer to Table 1 above for EOI group definitions.
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
0
25
50
75
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009 2010
perc
ent s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
.
mea
n V
ELS
sco
re
0
25
50
75
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009 2010
perc
ent s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
.
mea
n V
ELS
sco
re
0
25
50
75
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009 2010
perc
ent s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
.
mea
n V
ELS
sco
re
State Mean Score
Student Participation†
0
25
50
75
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009 2010
perc
ent s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
.
mea
n V
ELS
sco
re
0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
percentile
0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
percentile
0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
percentile
School Mean as percentile
SFO Percentile range
0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
percentile
%EOI group 1^ %EOI group 2^ %EOI group 3^ %EOI group 4 %EOI group 5 %EOI group 6
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009 2010m
ean
VE
LS s
core
School Mean Score
Beginning Prep / UngradedVELS score >= 2.1
VELS score = 1.6 to 2.0
VELS score = 1.1 to 1.5
VELS score = 0.6 to 1.0
VELS score = 0.1 to 0.5
VELS score = 0 (bottom of scale)
End Prep>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 6 months below expected
6-12 months below expected
bottom of scale
End Year 1>24 mths above expected
12-24 mths above expected
up to 12 mths above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-18 mths below expected
>18 mths below expected
End Year 2>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-24 months below expected
>24 months below expected
EOI group 6:
EOI group 5:
EOI group 4:
EOI group 3:
EOI group 2:
EOI group 1:
Note: In 2010, only the Beginning Prep assessment had taken place.
Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 4/03/2011Page 5 of 33
English Online Interview (EOI): Writing Table 1: Definition of EOI groups
School no:School name: Doreen Primary SchoolSource of data: English Online Interview application.Explanation: The English Online Interview is an assessment program that takes
the form of an interview between a teacher and a student, with responses being
945 Beginning Prep / UngradedVELS score >= 2.1
VELS score = 1.6 to 2.0
VELS score = 1.1 to 1.5
VELS score = 0.6 to 1.0
VELS score = 0.1 to 0.5
VELS 0 (b tt f l )
End Prep>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 6 months below expected
6-12 months below expected
b tt f l
End Year 1>24 mths above expected
12-24 mths above expected
up to 12 mths above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-18 mths below expected
18 th b l t d
End Year 2>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-24 months below expected
24 th b l t d
EOI group 6:
EOI group 5:
EOI group 4:
EOI group 3:
EOI group 2:
EOI 1
Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 4/03/2011Page 6 of 33
, p grecorded by the teacher in an online system. It was used for assessment ofPrep-Year 2 students in Victorian government schools from October 2009*.
Beginning Prep End Prep End Year 1 End Year 2
participation participation participation participation
(n) (%)† 1 2 3 4 5 6 School State (n) (%)† 1 2 3 4 5 6 School State (n) (%)† 1 2 3 4 5 6 School State (n) (%)† 1 2 3 4 5 6 School State2009 18 100 0 6 22 0 6 67 1 99 1 36 22 100 0 14 18 23 23 23 2 06 1 78 8 100 0 0 25 13 38 25 2 60 2 36
student Percent of students Mean VELS Score
student Percent of students Mean VELS Score
student Percent of students Percent of students Mean VELS Scoreby EOI group by EOI group by EOI group by EOI group
Mean VELS Score
student
Beginning Prep / UngradedVELS score >= 2.1
VELS score = 1.6 to 2.0
VELS score = 1.1 to 1.5
VELS score = 0.6 to 1.0
VELS score = 0.1 to 0.5
VELS score = 0 (bottom of scale)
End Prep>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 6 months below expected
6-12 months below expected
bottom of scale
End Year 1>24 mths above expected
12-24 mths above expected
up to 12 mths above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-18 mths below expected
>18 mths below expected
End Year 2>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-24 months below expected
>24 months below expected
EOI group 6:
EOI group 5:
EOI group 4:
EOI group 3:
EOI group 2:
EOI group 1:
2009 18 100 0 6 22 0 6 67 1.99 1.36 22 100 0 14 18 23 23 23 2.06 1.78 8 100 0 0 25 13 38 25 2.60 2.362010 18 100 94 0 6 0 0 0 0.0 0.1
Percent of student by EOI group School Mean as percentile against Beginning Prep End Prep End Year 1 End Year 2 Ungraded SFO percentile range**
p
100100 100 100 2009
2010
100
Beginning Prep / UngradedVELS score >= 2.1
VELS score = 1.6 to 2.0
VELS score = 1.1 to 1.5
VELS score = 0.6 to 1.0
VELS score = 0.1 to 0.5
VELS score = 0 (bottom of scale)
End Prep>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 6 months below expected
6-12 months below expected
bottom of scale
End Year 1>24 mths above expected
12-24 mths above expected
up to 12 mths above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-18 mths below expected
>18 mths below expected
End Year 2>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-24 months below expected
>24 months below expected
EOI group 6:
EOI group 5:
EOI group 4:
EOI group 3:
EOI group 2:
EOI group 1:
Note: In 2010, only the Beginning Prep assessment had taken place.
B
eg
inn
ing
Pre
p
0
20
40
60
80
100
perc
ent
40
60
80
100
perc
ent
0
20
40
60
80
100
perc
ent
0
20
40
60
80
100
perc
ent 0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
percentile40
60
80
100
perc
ent
Beginning Prep / UngradedVELS score >= 2.1
VELS score = 1.6 to 2.0
VELS score = 1.1 to 1.5
VELS score = 0.6 to 1.0
VELS score = 0.1 to 0.5
VELS score = 0 (bottom of scale)
End Prep>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 6 months below expected
6-12 months below expected
bottom of scale
End Year 1>24 mths above expected
12-24 mths above expected
up to 12 mths above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-18 mths below expected
>18 mths below expected
End Year 2>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-24 months below expected
>24 months below expected
EOI group 6:
EOI group 5:
EOI group 4:
EOI group 3:
EOI group 2:
EOI group 1:
Note: In 2010, only the Beginning Prep assessment had taken place.
U d d t d t ti i ti ( )
En
d P
rep
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
percentile
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
Beginning Prep / UngradedVELS score >= 2.1
VELS score = 1.6 to 2.0
VELS score = 1.1 to 1.5
VELS score = 0.6 to 1.0
VELS score = 0.1 to 0.5
VELS score = 0 (bottom of scale)
End Prep>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 6 months below expected
6-12 months below expected
bottom of scale
End Year 1>24 mths above expected
12-24 mths above expected
up to 12 mths above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-18 mths below expected
>18 mths below expected
End Year 2>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-24 months below expected
>24 months below expected
EOI group 6:
EOI group 5:
EOI group 4:
EOI group 3:
EOI group 2:
EOI group 1:
Note: In 2010, only the Beginning Prep assessment had taken place.
Ungraded student participation (n)= 0
School Mean against State Mean Beginning Prep End Prep End Year 1 End Year 2 Ungraded**
Y
ea
r 1
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
100
3.5
4.0
.
100
3.5
4.0
.
100
3.5
4.0
.
100
3.5
4.0
.
0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
percentile
2009
2010
0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
percentile
%EOI group 1^ %EOI group 2^ %EOI group 3^ %EOI group 4 %EOI group 5 %EOI group 6
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
3.5
4.0
Beginning Prep / UngradedVELS score >= 2.1
VELS score = 1.6 to 2.0
VELS score = 1.1 to 1.5
VELS score = 0.6 to 1.0
VELS score = 0.1 to 0.5
VELS score = 0 (bottom of scale)
End Prep>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 6 months below expected
6-12 months below expected
bottom of scale
End Year 1>24 mths above expected
12-24 mths above expected
up to 12 mths above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-18 mths below expected
>18 mths below expected
End Year 2>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-24 months below expected
>24 months below expected
EOI group 6:
EOI group 5:
EOI group 4:
EOI group 3:
EOI group 2:
EOI group 1:
Note: In 2010, only the Beginning Prep assessment had taken place.
E
nd
Y2
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
25
50
75
100
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
ent s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
.
mea
n V
ELS
sco
re
25
50
75
100
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
cent
stu
dent
par
ticip
atio
n .
mea
n V
ELS
sco
re
25
50
75
100
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
cent
stu
dent
par
ticip
atio
n .
mea
n V
ELS
sco
re
25
50
75
100
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
ent s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
.
mea
n V
ELS
sco
re
0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
percentile
0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
percentile
2009
2010
0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
percentile
%EOI group 1^ %EOI group 2^ %EOI group 3^ %EOI group 4 %EOI group 5 %EOI group 6
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
mea
n V
ELS
sco
re
Beginning Prep / UngradedVELS score >= 2.1
VELS score = 1.6 to 2.0
VELS score = 1.1 to 1.5
VELS score = 0.6 to 1.0
VELS score = 0.1 to 0.5
VELS score = 0 (bottom of scale)
End Prep>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 6 months below expected
6-12 months below expected
bottom of scale
End Year 1>24 mths above expected
12-24 mths above expected
up to 12 mths above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-18 mths below expected
>18 mths below expected
End Year 2>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-24 months below expected
>24 months below expected
EOI group 6:
EOI group 5:
EOI group 4:
EOI group 3:
EOI group 2:
EOI group 1:
Note: In 2010, only the Beginning Prep assessment had taken place.
Note: * In 2010, only the Beginning Prep assessment had taken place.† % t d t ti i ti ( t d t h ti i t d / F b A t l t ) * 100
E
nd
Ye
ar
2
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
0
25
50
75
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009 2010
perc
ent s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
.
mea
n V
ELS
sco
re
0
25
50
75
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009 2010
perc
ent s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
.
mea
n V
ELS
sco
re
0
25
50
75
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009 2010
perc
ent s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
.
mea
n V
ELS
sco
re
State Mean Score
Student Participation†
0
25
50
75
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009 2010
perc
ent s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
.
mea
n V
ELS
sco
re
0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
percentile
0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
percentile
0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
percentile
School Mean as percentile
SFO Percentile range
0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
percentile
%EOI group 1^ %EOI group 2^ %EOI group 3^ %EOI group 4 %EOI group 5 %EOI group 6
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009 2010m
ean
VE
LS s
core
School Mean Score
Beginning Prep / UngradedVELS score >= 2.1
VELS score = 1.6 to 2.0
VELS score = 1.1 to 1.5
VELS score = 0.6 to 1.0
VELS score = 0.1 to 0.5
VELS score = 0 (bottom of scale)
End Prep>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 6 months below expected
6-12 months below expected
bottom of scale
End Year 1>24 mths above expected
12-24 mths above expected
up to 12 mths above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-18 mths below expected
>18 mths below expected
End Year 2>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-24 months below expected
>24 months below expected
EOI group 6:
EOI group 5:
EOI group 4:
EOI group 3:
EOI group 2:
EOI group 1:
Note: In 2010, only the Beginning Prep assessment had taken place.
† % student participation = (students who participated / February or August census enrolments) * 100.** Percentiles and state means are not applicable for the ungraded cohort.^ EOI group definitions vary by year level. Refer to Table 1 above for EOI group definitions.
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
0
25
50
75
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009 2010
perc
ent s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
.
mea
n V
ELS
sco
re
0
25
50
75
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009 2010
perc
ent s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
.
mea
n V
ELS
sco
re
0
25
50
75
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009 2010
perc
ent s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
.
mea
n V
ELS
sco
re
State Mean Score
Student Participation†
0
25
50
75
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009 2010
perc
ent s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
.
mea
n V
ELS
sco
re
0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
percentile
0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
percentile
0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
percentile
School Mean as percentile
SFO Percentile range
0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
percentile
%EOI group 1^ %EOI group 2^ %EOI group 3^ %EOI group 4 %EOI group 5 %EOI group 6
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009 2010m
ean
VE
LS s
core
School Mean Score
Beginning Prep / UngradedVELS score >= 2.1
VELS score = 1.6 to 2.0
VELS score = 1.1 to 1.5
VELS score = 0.6 to 1.0
VELS score = 0.1 to 0.5
VELS score = 0 (bottom of scale)
End Prep>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 6 months below expected
6-12 months below expected
bottom of scale
End Year 1>24 mths above expected
12-24 mths above expected
up to 12 mths above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-18 mths below expected
>18 mths below expected
End Year 2>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-24 months below expected
>24 months below expected
EOI group 6:
EOI group 5:
EOI group 4:
EOI group 3:
EOI group 2:
EOI group 1:
Note: In 2010, only the Beginning Prep assessment had taken place.
Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 4/03/2011Page 6 of 33
English Online Interview (EOI): Speaking & Listening Table 1: Definition of EOI groups
School no:School name: Doreen Primary SchoolSource of data: English Online Interview application.Explanation: The English Online Interview is an assessment program that takes
the form of an interview between a teacher and a student, with responses being
945 Beginning Prep / UngradedVELS score >= 2.1
VELS score = 1.6 to 2.0
VELS score = 1.1 to 1.5
VELS score = 0.6 to 1.0
VELS score = 0.1 to 0.5
VELS 0 (b tt f l )
End Prep>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 6 months below expected
6-12 months below expected
b tt f l
End Year 1>24 mths above expected
12-24 mths above expected
up to 12 mths above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-18 mths below expected
18 th b l t d
End Year 2>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-24 months below expected
24 th b l t d
EOI group 6:
EOI group 5:
EOI group 4:
EOI group 3:
EOI group 2:
EOI 1
Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 4/03/2011Page 7 of 33
, p grecorded by the teacher in an online system. It was used for assessment ofPrep-Year 2 students in Victorian government schools from October 2009*.
Beginning Prep End Prep End Year 1 End Year 2
participation participation participation participation
(n) (%)† 1 2 3 4 5 6 School State (n) (%)† 1 2 3 4 5 6 School State (n) (%)† 1 2 3 4 5 6 School State (n) (%)† 1 2 3 4 5 6 School State2009 18 100 0 0 22 50 11 17 1 47 1 30 22 100 0 0 14 27 14 45 2 43 1 87 8 100 0 0 50 13 25 13 2 29 2 29
student Percent of students Mean VELS Score
student Percent of students Mean VELS Score
student Percent of students Percent of students Mean VELS Scoreby EOI group by EOI group by EOI group by EOI group
Mean VELS Score
student
Beginning Prep / UngradedVELS score >= 2.1
VELS score = 1.6 to 2.0
VELS score = 1.1 to 1.5
VELS score = 0.6 to 1.0
VELS score = 0.1 to 0.5
VELS score = 0 (bottom of scale)
End Prep>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 6 months below expected
6-12 months below expected
bottom of scale
End Year 1>24 mths above expected
12-24 mths above expected
up to 12 mths above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-18 mths below expected
>18 mths below expected
End Year 2>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-24 months below expected
>24 months below expected
EOI group 6:
EOI group 5:
EOI group 4:
EOI group 3:
EOI group 2:
EOI group 1:
2009 18 100 0 0 22 50 11 17 1.47 1.30 22 100 0 0 14 27 14 45 2.43 1.87 8 100 0 0 50 13 25 13 2.29 2.292010 18 100 17 17 50 6 11 0 0.7 0.4
Percent of student by EOI group School Mean as percentile against Beginning Prep End Prep End Year 1 End Year 2 Ungraded SFO percentile range**
p
100100 100 100 2009
2010
100
Beginning Prep / UngradedVELS score >= 2.1
VELS score = 1.6 to 2.0
VELS score = 1.1 to 1.5
VELS score = 0.6 to 1.0
VELS score = 0.1 to 0.5
VELS score = 0 (bottom of scale)
End Prep>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 6 months below expected
6-12 months below expected
bottom of scale
End Year 1>24 mths above expected
12-24 mths above expected
up to 12 mths above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-18 mths below expected
>18 mths below expected
End Year 2>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-24 months below expected
>24 months below expected
EOI group 6:
EOI group 5:
EOI group 4:
EOI group 3:
EOI group 2:
EOI group 1:
Note: In 2010, only the Beginning Prep assessment had taken place.
B
eg
inn
ing
Pre
p
0
20
40
60
80
100
perc
ent
40
60
80
100
perc
ent
0
20
40
60
80
100
perc
ent
0
20
40
60
80
100
perc
ent 0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
percentile40
60
80
100
perc
ent
Beginning Prep / UngradedVELS score >= 2.1
VELS score = 1.6 to 2.0
VELS score = 1.1 to 1.5
VELS score = 0.6 to 1.0
VELS score = 0.1 to 0.5
VELS score = 0 (bottom of scale)
End Prep>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 6 months below expected
6-12 months below expected
bottom of scale
End Year 1>24 mths above expected
12-24 mths above expected
up to 12 mths above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-18 mths below expected
>18 mths below expected
End Year 2>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-24 months below expected
>24 months below expected
EOI group 6:
EOI group 5:
EOI group 4:
EOI group 3:
EOI group 2:
EOI group 1:
Note: In 2010, only the Beginning Prep assessment had taken place.
U d d t d t ti i ti ( )
En
d P
rep
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
percentile
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
Beginning Prep / UngradedVELS score >= 2.1
VELS score = 1.6 to 2.0
VELS score = 1.1 to 1.5
VELS score = 0.6 to 1.0
VELS score = 0.1 to 0.5
VELS score = 0 (bottom of scale)
End Prep>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 6 months below expected
6-12 months below expected
bottom of scale
End Year 1>24 mths above expected
12-24 mths above expected
up to 12 mths above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-18 mths below expected
>18 mths below expected
End Year 2>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-24 months below expected
>24 months below expected
EOI group 6:
EOI group 5:
EOI group 4:
EOI group 3:
EOI group 2:
EOI group 1:
Note: In 2010, only the Beginning Prep assessment had taken place.
Ungraded student participation (n)= 0
School Mean against State Mean Beginning Prep End Prep End Year 1 End Year 2 Ungraded**
Y
ea
r 1
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
100
3.5
4.0
.
100
3.5
4.0
.
100
3.5
4.0
.
100
3.5
4.0
.
0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
percentile
2009
2010
0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
percentile
%EOI group 1^ %EOI group 2^ %EOI group 3^ %EOI group 4 %EOI group 5 %EOI group 6
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
3.5
4.0
Beginning Prep / UngradedVELS score >= 2.1
VELS score = 1.6 to 2.0
VELS score = 1.1 to 1.5
VELS score = 0.6 to 1.0
VELS score = 0.1 to 0.5
VELS score = 0 (bottom of scale)
End Prep>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 6 months below expected
6-12 months below expected
bottom of scale
End Year 1>24 mths above expected
12-24 mths above expected
up to 12 mths above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-18 mths below expected
>18 mths below expected
End Year 2>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-24 months below expected
>24 months below expected
EOI group 6:
EOI group 5:
EOI group 4:
EOI group 3:
EOI group 2:
EOI group 1:
Note: In 2010, only the Beginning Prep assessment had taken place.
E
nd
Y2
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
25
50
75
100
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
ent s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
.
mea
n V
ELS
sco
re
25
50
75
100
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
cent
stu
dent
par
ticip
atio
n .
mea
n V
ELS
sco
re
25
50
75
100
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
cent
stu
dent
par
ticip
atio
n .
mea
n V
ELS
sco
re
25
50
75
100
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
ent s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
.
mea
n V
ELS
sco
re
0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
percentile
0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
percentile
2009
2010
0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
percentile
%EOI group 1^ %EOI group 2^ %EOI group 3^ %EOI group 4 %EOI group 5 %EOI group 6
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
mea
n V
ELS
sco
re
Beginning Prep / UngradedVELS score >= 2.1
VELS score = 1.6 to 2.0
VELS score = 1.1 to 1.5
VELS score = 0.6 to 1.0
VELS score = 0.1 to 0.5
VELS score = 0 (bottom of scale)
End Prep>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 6 months below expected
6-12 months below expected
bottom of scale
End Year 1>24 mths above expected
12-24 mths above expected
up to 12 mths above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-18 mths below expected
>18 mths below expected
End Year 2>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-24 months below expected
>24 months below expected
EOI group 6:
EOI group 5:
EOI group 4:
EOI group 3:
EOI group 2:
EOI group 1:
Note: In 2010, only the Beginning Prep assessment had taken place.
Note: * In 2010, only the Beginning Prep assessment had taken place.† % t d t ti i ti ( t d t h ti i t d / F b A t l t ) * 100
E
nd
Ye
ar
2
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
0
25
50
75
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009 2010
perc
ent s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
.
mea
n V
ELS
sco
re
0
25
50
75
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009 2010
perc
ent s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
.
mea
n V
ELS
sco
re
0
25
50
75
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009 2010
perc
ent s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
.
mea
n V
ELS
sco
re
State Mean Score
Student Participation†
0
25
50
75
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009 2010
perc
ent s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
.
mea
n V
ELS
sco
re
0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
percentile
0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
percentile
0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
percentile
School Mean as percentile
SFO Percentile range
0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
percentile
%EOI group 1^ %EOI group 2^ %EOI group 3^ %EOI group 4 %EOI group 5 %EOI group 6
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009 2010m
ean
VE
LS s
core
School Mean Score
Beginning Prep / UngradedVELS score >= 2.1
VELS score = 1.6 to 2.0
VELS score = 1.1 to 1.5
VELS score = 0.6 to 1.0
VELS score = 0.1 to 0.5
VELS score = 0 (bottom of scale)
End Prep>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 6 months below expected
6-12 months below expected
bottom of scale
End Year 1>24 mths above expected
12-24 mths above expected
up to 12 mths above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-18 mths below expected
>18 mths below expected
End Year 2>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-24 months below expected
>24 months below expected
EOI group 6:
EOI group 5:
EOI group 4:
EOI group 3:
EOI group 2:
EOI group 1:
Note: In 2010, only the Beginning Prep assessment had taken place.
† % student participation = (students who participated / February or August census enrolments) * 100.** Percentiles and state means are not applicable for the ungraded cohort.^ EOI group definitions vary by year level. Refer to Table 1 above for EOI group definitions.
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
0
25
50
75
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009 2010
perc
ent s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
.
mea
n V
ELS
sco
re
0
25
50
75
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009 2010
perc
ent s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
.
mea
n V
ELS
sco
re
0
25
50
75
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009 2010
perc
ent s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
.
mea
n V
ELS
sco
re
State Mean Score
Student Participation†
0
25
50
75
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009 2010
perc
ent s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
.
mea
n V
ELS
sco
re
0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
percentile
0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
percentile
0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
percentile
School Mean as percentile
SFO Percentile range
0 20 40 60 80 100
2009
2010
percentile
%EOI group 1^ %EOI group 2^ %EOI group 3^ %EOI group 4 %EOI group 5 %EOI group 6
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010
perc
ent
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009 2010m
ean
VE
LS s
core
School Mean Score
Beginning Prep / UngradedVELS score >= 2.1
VELS score = 1.6 to 2.0
VELS score = 1.1 to 1.5
VELS score = 0.6 to 1.0
VELS score = 0.1 to 0.5
VELS score = 0 (bottom of scale)
End Prep>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 6 months below expected
6-12 months below expected
bottom of scale
End Year 1>24 mths above expected
12-24 mths above expected
up to 12 mths above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-18 mths below expected
>18 mths below expected
End Year 2>24 months above expected
12-24 months above expected
up to 12 months above expected
at or up to 12 months below expected
12-24 months below expected
>24 months below expected
EOI group 6:
EOI group 5:
EOI group 4:
EOI group 3:
EOI group 2:
EOI group 1:
Note: In 2010, only the Beginning Prep assessment had taken place.
Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 4/03/2011Page 7 of 33
Assessment of Reading: Prep to Year 2 (discontinued at the end of 2008)
School no:School name: Doreen Primary SchoolExplanation: Students' ability to read unsighted text is assessed at the end of each year. The data presented here includes 'deemed not capable' students.
More detailed information (including data where deemed not capable students are excluded) is available in the Assessment of Reading report, available from the School Performance Reports website.Source of data: Data transmitted from school to DEECD via an online web-form.
State State State
2008 2008 2008(No.) % (No.) % (No.) % (No.) % (No.) % % (No.) % (No.) % (No.) % (No.) % (No.) % % (No.) % (No.) % (No.) % (No.) % (No.) % %
100% (10) 100.0 (10) 100.0 (11) 100.0 (9) 90.0 (23) 92.0 69.0 (5) 100.0 (9) 100.0 (9) 100.0 (10) 100.0 (11) 100.0 94.790-99% (1) 10.0 (1) 4.0 25.4 4.780-89% 2.3 0.251-79% 1.5 0.250% or below (1) 4.0 1.7 0.3Total (10) 100.0 (10) 100.0 (11) 100.0 (10) 100.0 (25) 100.0 100.0 (5) 100.0 (9) 100.0 (9) 100.0 (10) 100.0 (11) 100.0 100.0
Subtotal 90-100% (10) 100.0 (10) 100.0 (11) 100.0 (10) 100.0 (24) 96.0 94.5 (5) 100.0 (9) 100.0 (9) 100.0 (10) 100.0 (11) 100.0 99.4
100% (10) 100.0 (10) 100.0 (10) 90.9 (6) 60.0 (14) 56.0 45.3 (5) 100.0 (9) 100.0 (9) 100.0 (9) 90.0 (11) 100.0 81.0 (7) 100.0 (4) 100.0 (12) 100.0 (15) 100.0 (10) 100.0 90.490-99% (1) 9.1 (2) 20.0 (9) 36.0 36.1 (1) 10.0 16.9 8.880-89% (1) 10.0 5.2 0.8 0.351-79% 3.6 0.4 0.150% or below (1) 10.0 (2) 8.0 9.8 1.0 0.4Total (10) 100.0 (10) 100.0 (11) 100.0 (10) 100.0 (25) 100.0 100.0 (5) 100.0 (9) 100.0 (9) 100.0 (10) 100.0 (11) 100.0 100.0 (7) 100.0 (4) 100.0 (12) 100.0 (15) 100.0 (10) 100.0 100.0
Subtotal 90-100% (10) 100.0 (10) 100.0 (11) 100.0 (8) 80.0 (23) 92.0 81.3 (5) 100.0 (9) 100.0 (9) 100.0 (10) 100.0 (11) 100.0 97.9 (7) 100.0 (4) 100.0 (12) 100.0 (15) 100.0 (10) 100.0 99.2
100% (6) 60.0 (5) 45.5 (4) 40.0 (2) 8.0 (4) 80.0 (8) 88.9 (9) 100.0 (5) 50.0 (3) 27.3 37.1 (7) 100.0 (4) 100.0 (12) 100.0 (15) 100.0 (9) 90.0 62.990-99% (2) 20.0 (1) 9.1 (8) 32.0 (1) 10.0 (8) 72.7 49.2 (1) 10.0 33.280-89% (2) 20.0 (1) 20.0 (1) 11.1 6.3 1.851-79% (1) 10.0 (3) 30.0 3.0 0.850% or below (5) 45.5 (5) 50.0 (15) 60.0 (1) 10.0 4.3 1.4Total (10) 100.0 (11) 100.0 (10) 100.0 (25) 100.0 (5) 100.0 (9) 100.0 (9) 100.0 (10) 100.0 (11) 100.0 100.0 (7) 100.0 (4) 100.0 (12) 100.0 (15) 100.0 (10) 100.0 100.0
Subtotal 90-100% (8) 80.0 (6) 54.5 (4) 40.0 (10) 40.0 (4) 80.0 (8) 88.9 (9) 100.0 (6) 60.0 (11) 100.0 86.4 (7) 100.0 (4) 100.0 (12) 100.0 (15) 100.0 (10) 100.0 96.1
100% (3) 27.3 (4) 40.0 (5) 55.6 (5) 50.0 (4) 36.4 (7) 100.0 (4) 100.0 (12) 100.0 (12) 80.0 (4) 40.0 47.490-99% (2) 18.2 (4) 16.0 (2) 22.2 (2) 18.2 (3) 20.0 (5) 50.0 47.180-89% (1) 11.1 (1) 10.0 2.451-79% 0.950% or below (6) 54.5 (6) 60.0 (21) 84.0 (1) 11.1 (5) 50.0 (5) 45.5 2.2Total (11) 100.0 (10) 100.0 (25) 100.0 (9) 100.0 (10) 100.0 (11) 100.0 (7) 100.0 (4) 100.0 (12) 100.0 (15) 100.0 (10) 100.0 100.0
Subtotal 90-100% (5) 45.5 (4) 40.0 (4) 16.0 (7) 77.8 (5) 50.0 (6) 54.5 (7) 100.0 (4) 100.0 (12) 100.0 (15) 100.0 (9) 90.0 94.5
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008No. of students DNC1: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0No. of students at risk 2: 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Notes:1 Students can be DNC (deemed not capable) only if they meet one of the conditions (insufficient English, receiving D&I funding, insufficient attendance at the school or referred
from Reading Recovery) AND read below the minimum standard.2 The number of students at risk is the number of students reading at less then 90% accuracy at Level 1 for Prep, Level 5 for Year 1 or Level 15 for Year 2.
Le
ve
l 1
5L
ev
el
20
Le
ve
l 5
945
Le
ve
l 1
Prep
School
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Year 2
School
200420052004
School
2007 2005 2008200720062008
Year 1
2006
Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 4/03/2011Page 8 of 33
Assessment of Reading: Prep to Year 2 (discontinued at the end of 2008)
School no: Note: ^ This data is highly skewed, with a lot of schools obtaining the best possible result, particularly
School name: Doreen Primary School in Year 2. The maximum achievable percentile is therefore significantly less than 100.
Explanation: Students' ability to read unsighted text is assessed at the end of each year.
Source of data: Data transmitted from school to DEECD via an online web-form.
Year level: Prep Year level: Year 1 Year level: Year 2Text level: Level 5 Text level: Level 15 Text level: Level 20
945
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
90%-100% accuracy 50% or below accuracy
perc
ent
Impr
ovem
ent
Impr
ovem
ent
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
90%-100% accuracy 50% or below accuracype
rcen
t
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
90%-100% accuracy 50% or below accuracy
perc
ent
School Score
State Mean
School Trendline
School Score at zero percent
Impr
ovem
ent
Impr
ovem
ent
Impr
ovem
ent
Impr
ovem
ent
Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 4/03/2011Page 9 of 33
90%-100% accuracy as percentile against SFO percentile range
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
90%-100% accuracy 50% or below accuracy
perc
ent
Impr
ovem
ent
Impr
ovem
ent
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
90%-100% accuracy 50% or below accuracype
rcen
t
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
90%-100% accuracy 50% or below accuracy
perc
ent
School Score
State Mean
School Trendline
School Score at zero percent
0 20 40 60 80 100
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2005-2008
percentile0 20 40 60 80 100
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2005-2008
percentile0 20 40 60 80 100
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2005-2008
percentile
School Score as percentile
School percentile has reached the maximum^
Maximum school score percentile^
SFO percentile range
Impr
ovem
ent
Impr
ovem
ent
Impr
ovem
ent
Impr
ovem
ent
Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 4/03/2011Page 9 of 33
Teacher Judgments against the VELS - Year levels Prep-6 combinedSchool no: 945School name: Doreen Primary SchoolSource of data: Data retrieved electronically from CASES21.Explanation: Semester 2 teacher judgments of student achievement against the VELS.
Year Levels:2008 93 11 34 55 0 0 93 5 24 70 1 0 93 4 19 75 1 0 93 3 25 72 0 0 93 2 11 87 0 02009 95 15 31 54 1 0 95 7 19 69 4 0 95 4 20 74 2 0 95 3 28 68 0 0 95 2 20 77 1 02010 99 25 35 38 1 0 99 13 28 55 4 0 99 11 27 59 3 0 99 6 40 53 1 0 99 4 31 63 2 0
Note: * The school trendline is only plotted when there is data for each calendar year.
% A
% B
Prep-6(combined)
% C
% C
% D total
students % A
% Btotal
students % E
% D
% E
% E
% E
% Btotal
students % A
% B
% C
% E
% C
% Dtotal
students % A
% B
% C
% D
% D total
students % A
Reading Measurement, Chance & DataNumberSpeaking & ListeningWriting
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
per
cen
t.
%A
%B
%C
%D
%E
%ABCTrendline*
Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 9/03/2011Page 10 of 33
Teacher Judgments against the VELS - English (primary)School no: Notes:
School name: Doreen Primary SchoolSource of data: Data retrieved electronically from CASES21.Explanation: Semester 2 teacher judgments of student achievement against the VELS.
Reading Writingtotal total total total
students A B C D E School State^ students A B C D E School State^ students A B C D E School State^ students A B C D E School State^2008 27 11 33 56 0 0 1.10 1.01 2008 15 13 40 47 0 0 3.15 2.99 2008 27 4 26 70 0 0 1.04 0.97 2008 15 0 33 67 0 0 3.07 2.922009 18 44 39 17 0 0 1.29 1.02 2009 16 0 44 56 0 0 3.09 3.02 2009 18 17 44 33 6 0 1.14 0.98 2009 16 0 25 75 0 0 3.03 2.942010 20 65 10 25 0 0 1.49 2010 9 11 11 78 0 0 3.06 2010 20 30 45 25 0 0 1.24 2010 9 11 11 56 22 0 2.972008 12 17 33 50 0 0 1.67 1.58 2008 5 0 40 60 0 0 3.55 3.47 2008 12 17 8 75 0 0 1.56 1.49 2008 5 0 0 100 0 0 3.40 3.402009 22 14 23 64 0 0 1.60 1.58 2009 15 7 40 53 0 0 3.62 3.49 2009 22 5 9 86 0 0 1.52 1.50 2009 15 7 13 80 0 0 3.53 3.422010 16 25 63 13 0 0 1.78 2010 13 0 54 46 0 0 3.60 2010 16 13 44 44 0 0 1.66 2010 13 0 23 77 0 0 3.502008 11 9 9 82 0 0 2.05 2.06 2008 8 25 38 38 0 0 4.22 3.96 2008 11 9 9 73 9 0 1.93 1.97 2008 8 13 50 38 0 0 4.16 3.902009 8 13 25 63 0 0 2.09 2.07 2009 5 0 0 100 0 0 3.95 4.00 2009 8 13 0 75 13 0 1.97 1.98 2009 5 0 0 100 0 0 3.90 3.922010 22 23 41 36 0 0 2.22 2010 13 8 38 46 8 0 4.10 2010 22 9 18 73 0 0 2.07 2010 13 8 23 62 8 0 4.042008 15 0 47 53 0 0 2.60 2.52 2008 15 0 27 73 0 0 2.52 2.442009 11 9 18 64 9 0 2.52 2.54 2009 11 9 18 55 18 0 2.43 2.462010 6 17 17 67 0 0 2.58 2010 6 17 17 50 17 0 2.54
Reading WritingSchool Mean against State Mean^ School Mean as percentile against SFO percentile range^ School Mean against State Mean^ School Mean as percentile against SFO percentile range^
945
Mean Score % of students by grade
Yr
1Y
r 2
Yr
3
Yr
5Y
r 6
Mean Score
Yr
4
% of students by grade % of students by grade% of students by grade Mean ScoreMean Score
Pre
p
Pre
pY
r 1
Yr
2
Yr
4Y
r 5
Yr
6
Yr
3
0 20 40 60 80 100
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
Pre
pY
r 1
Yr
2Y
r 3
Yr
4Y
r 5
Yr
6
percentileSchool Mean as percentile SFO Percentile range
-100-80-60
-40-20
020
4060
80100
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
Prep Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6
per
cen
t
-100-80-60
-40-20
020
4060
80100
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
Prep Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6
per
cen
t
%A
%B
%C
%D
%E%ABCTrendline*
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
Prep Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6
mea
n V
EL
S s
core
School Mean State Mean School Trendline*
0 20 40 60 80 100
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
Pre
pY
r 1
Yr
2Y
r 3
Yr
4Y
r 5
Yr
6
percentileSchool Mean as percentile SFO Percentile range
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
Prep Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6
mea
n V
EL
S s
core
School Mean State Mean School Trendline*
* The school trendline is only plotted when there is data for each calendar year.
^ 2010 benchmarks and percentiles will be calculated in August, when data fromall schools has been submitted.
Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 9/03/2011Page 11 of 33
Teacher Judgments against the VELS - English (primary)School no: Notes:
School name: Doreen Primary SchoolSource of data: Data retrieved electronically from CASES21.Explanation: Semester 2 teacher judgments of student achievement against the VELS.
Speaking and Listeningtotal total
students A B C D E School State^ students A B C D E School State^2008 27 0 7 93 0 0 0.98 0.97 2008 15 0 33 67 0 0 3.05 2.952009 18 0 39 61 0 0 1.10 0.98 2009 16 6 25 69 0 0 3.06 2.972010 20 20 45 35 0 0 1.21 2010 9 11 11 56 22 0 3.002008 12 8 33 58 0 0 1.63 1.49 2008 5 0 0 100 0 0 3.50 3.442009 22 0 18 82 0 0 1.55 1.50 2009 15 7 13 80 0 0 3.55 3.462010 16 6 44 50 0 0 1.63 2010 13 8 38 54 0 0 3.602008 11 9 9 73 9 0 1.95 1.98 2008 8 13 25 63 0 0 4.13 3.952009 8 13 0 88 0 0 1.97 2.00 2009 5 0 0 100 0 0 3.95 3.972010 22 9 14 77 0 0 2.06 2010 13 8 15 69 8 0 4.042008 15 7 27 67 0 0 2.55 2.462009 11 9 18 55 18 0 2.43 2.482010 6 17 0 83 0 0 2.54
Speaking and ListeningSchool Mean against State Mean^ School Mean as percentile against SFO percentile range^
Yr
3P
rep
Yr
1Y
r 2
Yr
4Y
r 5
Yr
6
% of students by grade Mean Score% of students by grade
945
Mean Score
-100-80-60
-40-20
020
4060
80100
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
Prep Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6
per
cen
t
%A
%B
%C
%D
%E%ABCTrendline*
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
Prep Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6
mea
n V
EL
S s
core
School Mean State Mean School Trendline*
0 20 40 60 80 100
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
Pre
pY
r 1
Yr
2Y
r 3
Yr
4Y
r 5
Yr
6
percentileSchool Mean as percentile SFO Percentile range
* The school trendline is only plotted when there is data for each calendar year.
^ 2010 benchmarks and percentiles will be calculated in August, when data fromall schools has been submitted.
Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 9/03/2011Page 12 of 33
Teacher Judgments against the VELS - Mathematics (primary)School no: Notes:
School name: Doreen Primary SchoolSource of data: Data retrieved electronically from CASES21.Explanation: Semester 2 teacher judgments of student achievement against the VELS.
Number Measurement, Chance and Datatotal total total total
students A B C D E School State^ students A B C D E School State^ students A B C D E School State^ students A B C D E School State^2008 27 0 19 81 0 0 0.97 1.00 2008 15 0 27 73 0 0 3.05 2.97 2008 27 0 7 93 0 0 0.96 0.98 2008 15 0 20 80 0 0 3.02 2.962009 18 6 67 28 0 0 1.17 1.01 2009 16 0 31 69 0 0 3.08 2.99 2009 18 0 33 67 0 0 1.06 0.98 2009 16 0 13 88 0 0 3.03 2.972010 20 0 75 25 0 0 1.16 2010 9 0 22 78 0 0 3.00 2010 20 0 40 60 0 0 1.08 2010 9 0 22 67 11 0 2.972008 12 0 50 50 0 0 1.60 1.51 2008 5 20 0 80 0 0 3.55 3.45 2008 12 0 8 92 0 0 1.50 1.49 2008 5 20 0 80 0 0 3.55 3.442009 22 0 18 82 0 0 1.50 1.53 2009 15 7 13 80 0 0 3.55 3.46 2009 22 0 32 68 0 0 1.56 1.50 2009 15 7 13 80 0 0 3.55 3.452010 16 6 50 44 0 0 1.64 2010 13 0 54 46 0 0 3.60 2010 16 0 75 25 0 0 1.69 2010 13 0 23 77 0 0 3.562008 11 0 18 82 0 0 1.95 2.00 2008 8 25 0 75 0 0 4.13 3.95 2008 11 0 18 82 0 0 1.93 1.98 2008 8 13 13 75 0 0 4.09 3.942009 8 0 25 75 0 0 2.03 2.02 2009 5 0 0 100 0 0 3.95 3.97 2009 8 0 0 100 0 0 1.97 1.99 2009 5 0 0 100 0 0 3.95 3.952010 22 14 14 73 0 0 2.10 2010 13 15 23 54 8 0 4.08 2010 22 14 9 77 0 0 2.05 2010 13 8 31 54 8 0 4.062008 15 0 40 60 0 0 2.60 2.49 2008 15 0 7 93 0 0 2.52 2.472009 11 9 18 73 0 0 2.50 2.50 2009 11 9 18 64 9 0 2.45 2.482010 6 0 33 67 0 0 2.58 2010 6 0 0 100 0 0 2.46
Number Measurement, Chance and DataSchool Mean against State Mean^ School Mean as percentile against SFO percentile range^ School Mean against State Mean^ School Mean as percentile against SFO percentile range^
Pre
pY
r 1
Yr
2
Yr
4Y
r 5
Yr
6
Yr
3
Mean Score
Yr
4
% of students by grade % of students by grade% of students by grade Mean ScoreMean Score
Pre
p
945
Mean Score % of students by grade
Yr
1Y
r 2
Yr
3
Yr
5Y
r 6
0 20 40 60 80 100
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
Pre
pY
r 1
Yr
2Y
r 3
Yr
4Y
r 5
Yr
6
percentileSchool Mean as percentile SFO Percentile range
-100-80-60
-40-20
020
4060
80100
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
Prep Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6
per
cen
t
-100-80-60
-40-20
020
4060
80100
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
Prep Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6
per
cen
t
%A
%B
%C
%D
%E%ABCTrendline*
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
Prep Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6
mea
n V
EL
S s
core
School Mean State Mean School Trendline*
0 20 40 60 80 100
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
Pre
pY
r 1
Yr
2Y
r 3
Yr
4Y
r 5
Yr
6
percentileSchool Mean as percentile SFO Percentile range
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
Prep Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6
mea
n V
EL
S s
core
School Mean State Mean School Trendline*
* The school trendline is only plotted when there is data for each calendar year.
^ 2010 benchmarks and percentiles will be calculated in August, when data fromall schools has been submitted.
Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 9/03/2011Page 13 of 33
Teacher Judgments against the VELS - English (primary)School no:School name: Doreen Primary SchoolSource of data: Data retrieved electronically from CASES21.Explanation: Semester 2 teacher judgments of student achievement against the VELS.
Reading0
.00
0.5
0
1.0
0
1.2
5
1.5
0
1.7
5
2.0
0
2.2
5
2.5
0
2.7
5
3.0
0
3.2
5
3.5
0
3.7
5
4.0
0
4.2
5
4.5
0
4.7
5
5.0
0
5.2
5
5.5
0
5.7
5
6.0
0
6.2
5
6.5
0
6.7
5
prep 2010 20 20 1 4 2 5 3 5 1.49 prep 2009 18 18 1 2 7 8 1.29 1.02 0.27yr1 2010 16 16 2 10 4 1.78 prep 2008 27 27 3 12 9 2 1 1.10 1.01 0.09yr1 2009 22 22 2 12 5 3 1.60 1.58 0.02yr2 2010 22 22 8 9 5 2.22 yr1 2008 12 12 6 4 2 1.67 1.58 0.09yr2 2009 8 8 1 4 2 1 2.09 2.07 0.02yr3 2010 6 6 1 3 1 1 2.58 yr2 2008 12 11 2 7 1 1 2.05 2.06 -0.02yr3 2009 12 11 1 2 5 2 1 2.52 2.54 -0.02yr4 2010 9 9 2 5 1 1 3.06 yr3 2008 15 15 1 7 7 2.60 2.52 0.08yr4 2009 16 16 1 8 7 3.09 3.02 0.08yr5 2010 13 13 2 4 7 3.60 yr4 2008 15 15 1 6 6 2 3.15 2.99 0.16yr5 2009 15 15 1 7 6 1 3.62 3.49 0.12yr6 2010 13 13 1 6 5 1 4.10 yr5 2008 5 5 1 2 2 3.55 3.47 0.08yr6 2009 5 5 1 4 3.95 4.00 -0.05 yr6 2008 8 8 3 3 2 4.22 3.96 0.26
shading indicates a 'C' grade (at the expected standard) on the VELS scale.
Notes:1 The total number of students eligible to be assessed. This figure will typically match, or be very close to, the Year Level enrolment.2 The number of students assessed against the VELS. The difference between this figure and the total (1) should be accounted for
by students assessed against Individual Learning Plans and/or the ESL companion in the case of English.^ 2010 benchmarks will be calculated in August, when data from all schools has been submitted.
Ye
ar
Le
vel
Ye
ar
To
tal1
Ass
ess
ed2
State mean^
Difference between
school and state
mean^
945
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 5 Level 6 Level 6ESchool mean
Level 4
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
2010
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2008
prep prep yr1 prep yr1 yr2 yr1 yr2 yr3 yr2 yr3 yr4 yr3 yr4 yr5 yr4 yr5 yr6 yr5 yr6 yr6
Difference between school mean and state mean^, by cohort group
diffe
renc
e be
twee
n sc
hool
mea
n an
d st
ate
mea
n
Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 9/03/2011Page 14 of 33
Teacher Judgments against the VELS - English (primary)School no:School name: Doreen Primary SchoolSource of data: Data retrieved electronically from CASES21.Explanation: Semester 2 teacher judgments of student achievement against the VELS.
Writing0
.00
0.5
0
1.0
0
1.2
5
1.5
0
1.7
5
2.0
0
2.2
5
2.5
0
2.7
5
3.0
0
3.2
5
3.5
0
3.7
5
4.0
0
4.2
5
4.5
0
4.7
5
5.0
0
5.2
5
5.5
0
5.7
5
6.0
0
6.2
5
6.5
0
6.7
5
prep 2010 20 20 1 4 9 6 1.24 prep 2009 18 18 1 6 8 3 1.14 0.98 0.16yr1 2010 16 16 1 6 7 2 1.66 prep 2008 27 27 3 16 7 1 1.04 0.97 0.06yr1 2009 22 22 2 17 2 1 1.52 1.50 0.02yr2 2010 22 22 2 14 4 2 2.07 yr1 2008 12 12 2 7 1 2 1.56 1.49 0.07yr2 2009 8 8 1 1 5 1 1.97 1.98 -0.01yr3 2010 6 6 1 3 1 1 2.54 yr2 2008 12 11 1 4 4 1 1 1.93 1.97 -0.03yr3 2009 12 11 2 3 3 2 1 2.43 2.46 -0.03yr4 2010 9 9 2 5 1 1 2.97 yr3 2008 15 15 3 8 4 2.52 2.44 0.07yr4 2009 16 16 2 10 4 3.03 2.94 0.09yr5 2010 13 13 3 7 3 3.50 yr4 2008 15 15 1 9 5 3.07 2.92 0.15yr5 2009 15 15 2 10 2 1 3.53 3.42 0.12yr6 2010 13 13 1 1 7 3 1 4.04 yr5 2008 5 5 2 3 3.40 3.40 0.00yr6 2009 5 5 2 3 3.90 3.92 -0.02 yr6 2008 8 8 1 2 4 1 4.16 3.90 0.26
shading indicates a 'C' grade (at the expected standard) on the VELS scale.
Notes:1 The total number of students eligible to be assessed. This figure will typically match, or be very close to, the Year Level enrolment.2 The number of students assessed against the VELS. The difference between this figure and the total (1) should be accounted for
by students assessed against Individual Learning Plans and/or the ESL companion in the case of English.^ 2010 benchmarks will be calculated in August, when data from all schools has been submitted.
Difference between
school and state
mean^
945
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 5 Level 6 Level 6ESchool mean
Level 4
Ye
ar
Le
vel
Ye
ar
To
tal1
Ass
ess
ed2
State mean^
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
2010
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2008
prep prep yr1 prep yr1 yr2 yr1 yr2 yr3 yr2 yr3 yr4 yr3 yr4 yr5 yr4 yr5 yr6 yr5 yr6 yr6
Difference between school mean and state mean^, by cohort group
diffe
renc
e be
twee
n sc
hool
mea
n an
d st
ate
mea
n
Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 9/03/2011Page 15 of 33
Teacher Judgments against the VELS - English (primary)School no:School name: Doreen Primary SchoolSource of data: Data retrieved electronically from CASES21.Explanation: Semester 2 teacher judgments of student achievement against the VELS.
Speaking and Listening0
.00
0.5
0
1.0
0
1.2
5
1.5
0
1.7
5
2.0
0
2.2
5
2.5
0
2.7
5
3.0
0
3.2
5
3.5
0
3.7
5
4.0
0
4.2
5
4.5
0
4.7
5
5.0
0
5.2
5
5.5
0
5.7
5
6.0
0
6.2
5
6.5
0
6.7
5
prep 2010 20 20 7 9 4 1.21 prep 2009 18 18 11 7 1.10 0.98 0.12yr1 2010 16 16 1 7 7 1 1.63 prep 2008 27 27 2 23 2 0.98 0.97 0.01yr1 2009 22 22 18 4 1.55 1.50 0.04yr2 2010 22 22 2 15 3 2 2.06 yr1 2008 12 12 7 4 1 1.63 1.49 0.14yr2 2009 8 8 3 4 1 1.97 2.00 -0.03yr3 2010 6 6 1 4 1 2.54 yr2 2008 12 11 1 4 4 1 1 1.95 1.98 -0.03yr3 2009 12 11 1 1 3 3 2 1 2.43 2.48 -0.04yr4 2010 9 9 2 5 1 1 3.00 yr3 2008 15 15 3 7 4 1 2.55 2.46 0.09yr4 2009 16 16 2 9 4 1 3.06 2.97 0.09yr5 2010 13 13 2 5 5 1 3.60 yr4 2008 15 15 2 8 5 3.05 2.95 0.10yr5 2009 15 15 1 11 2 1 3.55 3.46 0.09yr6 2010 13 13 1 9 2 1 4.04 yr5 2008 5 5 5 3.50 3.44 0.06yr6 2009 5 5 1 4 3.95 3.97 -0.02 yr6 2008 8 8 5 2 1 4.13 3.95 0.18
shading indicates a 'C' grade (at the expected standard) on the VELS scale.
Notes:1 The total number of students eligible to be assessed. This figure will typically match, or be very close to, the Year Level enrolment.2 The number of students assessed against the VELS. The difference between this figure and the total (1) should be accounted for
by students assessed against Individual Learning Plans and/or the ESL companion in the case of English.^ 2010 benchmarks will be calculated in August, when data from all schools has been submitted.
Ye
ar
Le
vel
Ye
ar
To
tal1
Ass
ess
ed2
State mean^
Difference between
school and state
mean^
945
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 5 Level 6 Level 6ESchool mean
Level 4
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
2010
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2008
prep prep yr1 prep yr1 yr2 yr1 yr2 yr3 yr2 yr3 yr4 yr3 yr4 yr5 yr4 yr5 yr6 yr5 yr6 yr6
Difference between school mean and state mean^, by cohort group
diffe
renc
e be
twee
n sc
hool
mea
n an
d st
ate
mea
n
Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 9/03/2011Page 16 of 33
Teacher Judgments against the VELS - Mathematics (primary)School no:School name: Doreen Primary SchoolSource of data: Data retrieved electronically from CASES21.Explanation: Semester 2 teacher judgments of student achievement against the VELS.
Number0
.00
0.5
0
1.0
0
1.2
5
1.5
0
1.7
5
2.0
0
2.2
5
2.5
0
2.7
5
3.0
0
3.2
5
3.5
0
3.7
5
4.0
0
4.2
5
4.5
0
4.7
5
5.0
0
5.2
5
5.5
0
5.7
5
6.0
0
6.2
5
6.5
0
6.7
5
prep 2010 20 20 1 4 15 1.16 prep 2009 18 18 1 4 12 1 1.17 1.01 0.16yr1 2010 16 16 1 6 8 1 1.64 prep 2008 27 27 4 18 5 0.97 1.00 -0.03yr1 2009 22 22 4 14 4 1.50 1.53 -0.03yr2 2010 22 22 16 3 3 2.10 yr1 2008 12 12 1 5 6 1.60 1.51 0.09yr2 2009 8 8 1 5 2 2.03 2.02 0.01yr3 2010 6 6 4 2 2.58 yr2 2008 12 11 4 5 2 1.95 2.00 -0.05yr3 2009 12 11 4 4 2 1 2.50 2.50 0.00yr4 2010 9 9 2 5 2 3.00 yr3 2008 15 15 9 6 2.60 2.49 0.11yr4 2009 16 16 11 5 3.08 2.99 0.09yr5 2010 13 13 2 4 7 3.60 yr4 2008 15 15 1 10 4 3.05 2.97 0.08yr5 2009 15 15 1 11 2 1 3.55 3.46 0.09yr6 2010 13 13 1 1 6 3 2 4.08 yr5 2008 5 5 1 3 1 3.55 3.45 0.10yr6 2009 5 5 1 4 3.95 3.97 -0.02 yr6 2008 8 8 6 2 4.13 3.95 0.17
shading indicates a 'C' grade (at the expected standard) on the VELS scale.
Notes:1 The total number of students eligible to be assessed. This figure will typically match, or be very close to, the Year Level enrolment.2 The number of students assessed against the VELS. The difference between this figure and the total (1) should be accounted for
by students assessed against Individual Learning Plans and/or the ESL companion in the case of English.^ 2010 benchmarks will be calculated in August, when data from all schools has been submitted.
Difference between
school and state
mean^
945
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 5 Level 6 Level 6ESchool mean
Level 4
Ye
ar
Le
vel
Ye
ar
To
tal1
Ass
ess
ed2
State mean^
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
2010
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2008
prep prep yr1 prep yr1 yr2 yr1 yr2 yr3 yr2 yr3 yr4 yr3 yr4 yr5 yr4 yr5 yr6 yr5 yr6 yr6
Difference between school mean and state mean^, by cohort group
diffe
renc
e be
twee
n sc
hool
mea
n an
d st
ate
mea
n
Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 9/03/2011Page 17 of 33
Teacher Judgments against the VELS - Mathematics (primary)School no:School name: Doreen Primary SchoolSource of data: Data retrieved electronically from CASES21.Explanation: Semester 2 teacher judgments of student achievement against the VELS.
Measurement, Chance and Data0
.00
0.5
0
1.0
0
1.2
5
1.5
0
1.7
5
2.0
0
2.2
5
2.5
0
2.7
5
3.0
0
3.2
5
3.5
0
3.7
5
4.0
0
4.2
5
4.5
0
4.7
5
5.0
0
5.2
5
5.5
0
5.7
5
6.0
0
6.2
5
6.5
0
6.7
5
prep 2010 20 20 1 11 8 1.08 prep 2009 18 18 1 11 6 1.06 0.98 0.07yr1 2010 16 16 4 12 1.69 prep 2008 27 27 3 22 2 0.96 0.98 -0.02yr1 2009 22 22 2 13 7 1.56 1.50 0.06yr2 2010 22 22 4 13 2 3 2.05 yr1 2008 12 12 1 10 1 1.50 1.49 0.01yr2 2009 8 8 1 7 1.97 1.99 -0.02yr3 2010 6 6 1 5 2.46 yr2 2008 12 11 5 4 2 1.93 1.98 -0.05yr3 2009 12 11 1 4 3 2 1 2.45 2.48 -0.03yr4 2010 9 9 1 1 5 2 2.97 yr3 2008 15 15 14 1 2.52 2.47 0.05yr4 2009 16 16 14 2 3.03 2.97 0.06yr5 2010 13 13 10 3 3.56 yr4 2008 15 15 2 10 3 3.02 2.96 0.06yr5 2009 15 15 1 11 2 1 3.55 3.45 0.10yr6 2010 13 13 1 7 4 1 4.06 yr5 2008 5 5 1 3 1 3.55 3.44 0.11yr6 2009 5 5 1 4 3.95 3.95 0.00 yr6 2008 8 8 6 1 1 4.09 3.94 0.16
shading indicates a 'C' grade (at the expected standard) on the VELS scale.
Notes:1 The total number of students eligible to be assessed. This figure will typically match, or be very close to, the Year Level enrolment.2 The number of students assessed against the VELS. The difference between this figure and the total (1) should be accounted for
by students assessed against Individual Learning Plans and/or the ESL companion in the case of English.^ 2010 benchmarks will be calculated in August, when data from all schools has been submitted.
Ye
ar
Le
vel
Ye
ar
To
tal1
Ass
ess
ed2
State mean^
Difference between
school and state
mean^
945
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 5 Level 6 Level 6ESchool mean
Level 4
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
2010
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2008
prep prep yr1 prep yr1 yr2 yr1 yr2 yr3 yr2 yr3 yr4 yr3 yr4 yr5 yr4 yr5 yr6 yr5 yr6 yr6
Difference between school mean and state mean^, by cohort group
diffe
renc
e be
twee
n sc
hool
mea
n an
d st
ate
mea
n
Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 9/03/2011Page 18 of 33
ESL Companion GuideSchool no:School name: Doreen Primary SchoolSource of data: Data retrieved electronically from CASES21.Explanation: Assessment of students against the ESL (English as a Second Language) Companion Guide.
Students assessed on the ESL Companion Guide, 2010:
Reading: 0Writing: 0
Speaking & Listening: 0
Enrolment at February 2010 census: 98
Reading, 2010
Writing, 2010
Speaking and Listening, 2010
945
00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9
1
A1.
1
A1.
2
A1.
3
A2.
1
A2.
2
A2.
3
B0.
1
B0.
2
B0.
3
B1.
1
B1.
2
B1.
3
B2.
1
B2.
2
B2.
3
B3.
1
B3.
2
B3.
3
S0.
1
S0.
2
S0.
3
S1.
1
S1.
2
S1.
3
S2.
1
S2.
2
S2.
3
S3.
1
S3.
2
S3.
3
S4.
1
S4.
2
S4.
3
Primary (Years P to 2) Primary (Years 3 to 6) Secondary (Years 7 to 10)
num
ber
of s
tude
nts
00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9
1
A1.
1
A1.
2
A1.
3
A2.
1
A2.
2
A2.
3
B0.
1
B0.
2
B0.
3
B1.
1
B1.
2
B1.
3
B2.
1
B2.
2
B2.
3
B3.
1
B3.
2
B3.
3
S0.
1
S0.
2
S0.
3
S1.
1
S1.
2
S1.
3
S2.
1
S2.
2
S2.
3
S3.
1
S3.
2
S3.
3
S4.
1
S4.
2
S4.
3
Primary (Years P to 2) Primary (Years 3 to 6) Secondary (Years 7 to 10)
num
ber
of s
tude
nts
00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9
1
A1.
1
A1.
2
A1.
3
A2.
1
A2.
2
A2.
3
B0.
1
B0.
2
B0.
3
B1.
1
B1.
2
B1.
3
B2.
1
B2.
2
B2.
3
B3.
1
B3.
2
B3.
3
S0.
1
S0.
2
S0.
3
S1.
1
S1.
2
S1.
3
S2.
1
S2.
2
S2.
3
S3.
1
S3.
2
S3.
3
S4.
1
S4.
2
S4.
3
Primary (Years P to 2) Primary (Years 3 to 6) Secondary (Years 7 to 10)
num
ber
of s
tude
nts
Produced by Data, Outcomes andEvaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 9/03/2011Page 19 of 33
NAPLAN Year 3 and 5: ReadingSchool no:School name: Doreen Primary SchoolSource of data: Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority.Explanation: The National Assessment Program - Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) is conducted each year for students in Years 3, 5, 7 and 9. For more detailed NAPLAN data, refer to the NAPLAN Data Service
website at http://naplands.vcaa.vic.edu.au. A reference guide for analysing NAPLAN data is available at http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/vcaa/prep10/naplan/schools/analysingnaplandata.pdf.
Year 3 Year 5
(n) (%) 1 2 3 4 5 6 School State (n) (%) 3 4 5 6 7 8 School State2008 15 94 0 0 13 13 40 33 457.4 415.8 2008 5 100 0 0 20 60 0 20 521.7 492.12009 10 83 0 11 0 22 33 33 465.8 427.5 2009 15 100 0 7 0 13 40 40 558.8 502.4 School State2010 6 100 0 0 0 50 0 50 496.8 427.4 2010 13 100 0 15 8 23 31 23 525.5 497.9 2008-10 12 12 52.6 82.0
Percent of students by NAP Band Percent of students by NAP Band School Mean Growth against State Mean
945
student participation** Band
Percent of students by NAP Band Mean ScaledScore
student participation**
Mean ScaledScoreBand
Percent of students by NAP Band
Mean Scaled Score GrowthMC
total†MC with 2
scores
Number of students
Matched Cohort (MC)
60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
perc
ent
60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
perc
ent
Notes: * The school trendline is only plotted when there is data for each calendar year.
** % student participation = students who participated in NAPLAN (not absent / withdrawn but including exempt) / total number of students (including exempt / absent / withdrawn).
120
160
200
240
ed s
core
gro
wth
† The Matched Cohort total includes students who wereabsent, withdrawn or exempt in either calendar year.
Year 3 Year 5School Mean against State Mean, School Mean as percentile against School Mean against State Mean, School Mean as percentile againstincluding Participation SFO percentile range including Participation SFO percentile range
School Mean Growth as percentile
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2008 2009 2010
perc
ent
%>=Band3 School Trendline*% Band 1&2 % Band 3 % Band 4 % Band 5&6
0
25
50
75
100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
2008
2009
2010
perc
ent
stud
ent
part
icip
atio
n .
mea
n sc
aled
sco
re
School Mean Score State Mean Score
School Trendline* Student Participation**
0 20 40 60 80 100
2008
2009
2010
percentile
School Mean as percentile
SFO Percentile range
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2008 2009 2010
perc
ent
%>=Band5 School Trendline*% Band 3&4 % Band 5 % Band 6 % Band 7&8
0
25
50
75
100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
80020
08
2009
2010
perc
ent
stud
ent
part
icip
atio
n .
mea
n sc
aled
sco
re
School Mean Score State Mean Score
School Trendline* Student Participation**
0 20 40 60 80 100
2008
2009
2010
percentile
School Mean as percentile
SFO Percentile range
Notes: * The school trendline is only plotted when there is data for each calendar year.
** % student participation = students who participated in NAPLAN (not absent / withdrawn but including exempt) / total number of students (including exempt / absent / withdrawn).
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
2008-10
mea
n sc
aled
sco
re g
row
th
School Mean Growth State Mean Growth
School Trendline*
0 20 40 60 80 100
2008-10
percentile
School Mean Growth as percentile
† The Matched Cohort total includes students who wereabsent, withdrawn or exempt in either calendar year.
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2008 2009 2010
perc
ent
%>=Band3 School Trendline*% Band 1&2 % Band 3 % Band 4 % Band 5&6
0
25
50
75
100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
2008
2009
2010
perc
ent
stud
ent
part
icip
atio
n .
mea
n sc
aled
sco
re
School Mean Score State Mean Score
School Trendline* Student Participation**
0 20 40 60 80 100
2008
2009
2010
percentile
School Mean as percentile
SFO Percentile range
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2008 2009 2010
perc
ent
%>=Band5 School Trendline*% Band 3&4 % Band 5 % Band 6 % Band 7&8
0
25
50
75
100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
80020
08
2009
2010
perc
ent
stud
ent
part
icip
atio
n .
mea
n sc
aled
sco
re
School Mean Score State Mean Score
School Trendline* Student Participation**
0 20 40 60 80 100
2008
2009
2010
percentile
School Mean as percentile
SFO Percentile range
Notes: * The school trendline is only plotted when there is data for each calendar year.
** % student participation = students who participated in NAPLAN (not absent / withdrawn but including exempt) / total number of students (including exempt / absent / withdrawn).
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
2008-10
mea
n sc
aled
sco
re g
row
th
School Mean Growth State Mean Growth
School Trendline*
0 20 40 60 80 100
2008-10
percentile
School Mean Growth as percentile
† The Matched Cohort total includes students who wereabsent, withdrawn or exempt in either calendar year.
Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 5/03/2011Page 20 of 33
NAPLAN Year 3 and 5: WritingSchool no:School name: Doreen Primary SchoolSource of data: Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority.Explanation: The National Assessment Program - Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) is conducted each year for students in Years 3, 5, 7 and 9. For more detailed NAPLAN data, refer to the NAPLAN Data Service
website at http://naplands.vcaa.vic.edu.au. A reference guide for analysing NAPLAN data is available at http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/vcaa/prep10/naplan/schools/analysingnaplandata.pdf.
Year 3 Year 5
(n) (%) 1 2 3 4 5 6 School State (n) (%) 3 4 5 6 7 8 School State2008 14 88 0 0 14 21 36 29 441.2 421.3 2008 4 80 0 25 0 25 50 0 493.9 496.12009 10 83 11 11 22 33 22 0 372.4 423.4 2009 15 100 0 0 13 47 27 13 524.5 491.9 School State2010 6 100 0 0 0 17 17 67 477.0 425.6 2010 13 100 0 0 39 39 8 15 500.0 492.5 2008-10 12 11 35.8 70.9
Percent of students by NAP Band Percent of students by NAP Band School Mean Growth against State Mean
Mean Scaled Score GrowthMC
total†MC with 2
scores
945
student participation**
Percent of students by NAP Band Mean ScaledScore
student participation**
Percent of students by NAP Band Mean ScaledScore Matched Cohort (MC)Band Band
Number of students
60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
perc
ent
60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
perc
ent
120
160
200
ed s
core
gro
wth
Notes: * The school trendline is only plotted when there is data for each calendar year.
** % student participation = students who participated in NAPLAN (not absent / withdrawn but including exempt) / total number of students (including exempt / absent / withdrawn).
† The Matched Cohort total includes students who wereabsent, withdrawn or exempt in either calendar year.
Year 3 Year 5School Mean against State Mean, School Mean as percentile against School Mean against State Mean, School Mean as percentile againstincluding Participation SFO percentile range including Participation SFO percentile range
School Mean Growth as percentile
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2008 2009 2010
perc
ent
%>=Band3 School Trendline*% Band 1&2 % Band 3 % Band 4 % Band 5&6
0
25
50
75
100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
2008
2009
2010
perc
ent
stud
ent
part
icip
atio
n .
mea
n sc
aled
sco
re
School Mean Score State Mean Score
School Trendline* Student Participation**
0 20 40 60 80 100
2008
2009
2010
percentile
School Mean as percentile
SFO Percentile range
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2008 2009 2010
perc
ent
%>=Band5 School Trendline*% Band 3&4 % Band 5 % Band 6 % Band 7&8
0
25
50
75
100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
80020
08
2009
2010
perc
ent
stud
ent
part
icip
atio
n .
mea
n sc
aled
sco
re
School Mean Score State Mean Score
School Trendline* Student Participation**
0 20 40 60 80 100
2008
2009
2010
percentile
School Mean as percentile
SFO Percentile range
0
40
80
120
160
200
2008-10
mea
n sc
aled
sco
re g
row
th
School Mean Growth State Mean Growth
School Trendline*
0 20 40 60 80 100
2008-10
percentile
School Mean Growth as percentile
Notes: * The school trendline is only plotted when there is data for each calendar year.
** % student participation = students who participated in NAPLAN (not absent / withdrawn but including exempt) / total number of students (including exempt / absent / withdrawn).
† The Matched Cohort total includes students who wereabsent, withdrawn or exempt in either calendar year.
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2008 2009 2010
perc
ent
%>=Band3 School Trendline*% Band 1&2 % Band 3 % Band 4 % Band 5&6
0
25
50
75
100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
2008
2009
2010
perc
ent
stud
ent
part
icip
atio
n .
mea
n sc
aled
sco
re
School Mean Score State Mean Score
School Trendline* Student Participation**
0 20 40 60 80 100
2008
2009
2010
percentile
School Mean as percentile
SFO Percentile range
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2008 2009 2010
perc
ent
%>=Band5 School Trendline*% Band 3&4 % Band 5 % Band 6 % Band 7&8
0
25
50
75
100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
80020
08
2009
2010
perc
ent
stud
ent
part
icip
atio
n .
mea
n sc
aled
sco
re
School Mean Score State Mean Score
School Trendline* Student Participation**
0 20 40 60 80 100
2008
2009
2010
percentile
School Mean as percentile
SFO Percentile range
0
40
80
120
160
200
2008-10
mea
n sc
aled
sco
re g
row
th
School Mean Growth State Mean Growth
School Trendline*
0 20 40 60 80 100
2008-10
percentile
School Mean Growth as percentile
Notes: * The school trendline is only plotted when there is data for each calendar year.
** % student participation = students who participated in NAPLAN (not absent / withdrawn but including exempt) / total number of students (including exempt / absent / withdrawn).
† The Matched Cohort total includes students who wereabsent, withdrawn or exempt in either calendar year.
Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 5/03/2011Page 21 of 33
NAPLAN Year 3 and 5: NumeracySchool no:School name: Doreen Primary SchoolSource of data: Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority.Explanation: The National Assessment Program - Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) is conducted each year for students in Years 3, 5, 7 and 9. For more detailed NAPLAN data, refer to the NAPLAN Data Service
website at http://naplands.vcaa.vic.edu.au. A reference guide for analysing NAPLAN data is available at http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/vcaa/prep10/naplan/schools/analysingnaplandata.pdf.
Year 3 Year 5
(n) (%) 1 2 3 4 5 6 School State (n) (%) 3 4 5 6 7 8 School State2008 15 94 0 0 13 20 33 33 442.0 416.1 2008 5 100 0 0 0 100 0 0 502.5 487.82009 12 100 0 0 9 27 36 27 460.8 410.6 2009 15 100 7 0 53 27 7 7 483.2 495.4 School State2010 6 100 0 0 0 17 33 50 493.1 411.1 2010 13 100 0 8 0 23 39 31 562.4 501.8 2008-10 12 12 106.0 85.8
Percent of students by NAP Band Percent of students by NAP Band School Mean Growth against State Mean
Mean Scaled Score GrowthMC
total†MC with 2
scores
945
student participation**
Percent of students by NAP Band Mean ScaledScore
student participation**
Percent of students by NAP Band Mean ScaledScore Matched Cohort (MC)Band Band
Number of students
60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
perc
ent
60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
perc
ent
120
160
200
240
ed s
core
gro
wth
Notes: * The school trendline is only plotted when there is data for each calendar year.
** % student participation = students who participated in NAPLAN (not absent / withdrawn but including exempt) / total number of students (including exempt / absent / withdrawn).
† The Matched Cohort total includes students who wereabsent, withdrawn or exempt in either calendar year.
Year 3 Year 5School Mean against State Mean, School Mean as percentile against School Mean against State Mean, School Mean as percentile againstincluding Participation SFO percentile range including Participation SFO percentile range
School Mean Growth as percentile
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2008 2009 2010
perc
ent
%>=Band3 School Trendline*% Band 1&2 % Band 3 % Band 4 % Band 5&6
0
25
50
75
100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
2008
2009
2010
perc
ent
stud
ent
part
icip
atio
n .
mea
n sc
aled
sco
re
School Mean Score State Mean Score
School Trendline* Student Participation**
0 20 40 60 80 100
2008
2009
2010
percentile
School Mean as percentile
SFO Percentile range
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2008 2009 2010
perc
ent
%>=Band5 School Trendline*% Band 3&4 % Band 5 % Band 6 % Band 7&8
0
25
50
75
100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
80020
08
2009
2010
perc
ent
stud
ent
part
icip
atio
n .
mea
n sc
aled
sco
re
School Mean Score State Mean Score
School Trendline* Student Participation**
0 20 40 60 80 100
2008
2009
2010
percentile
School Mean as percentile
SFO Percentile range
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
2008-10
mea
n sc
aled
sco
re g
row
th
School Mean Growth State Mean Growth
School Trendline*
0 20 40 60 80 100
2008-10
percentile
School Mean Growth as percentile
Notes: * The school trendline is only plotted when there is data for each calendar year.
** % student participation = students who participated in NAPLAN (not absent / withdrawn but including exempt) / total number of students (including exempt / absent / withdrawn).
† The Matched Cohort total includes students who wereabsent, withdrawn or exempt in either calendar year.
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2008 2009 2010
perc
ent
%>=Band3 School Trendline*% Band 1&2 % Band 3 % Band 4 % Band 5&6
0
25
50
75
100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
2008
2009
2010
perc
ent
stud
ent
part
icip
atio
n .
mea
n sc
aled
sco
re
School Mean Score State Mean Score
School Trendline* Student Participation**
0 20 40 60 80 100
2008
2009
2010
percentile
School Mean as percentile
SFO Percentile range
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2008 2009 2010
perc
ent
%>=Band5 School Trendline*% Band 3&4 % Band 5 % Band 6 % Band 7&8
0
25
50
75
100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
80020
08
2009
2010
perc
ent
stud
ent
part
icip
atio
n .
mea
n sc
aled
sco
re
School Mean Score State Mean Score
School Trendline* Student Participation**
0 20 40 60 80 100
2008
2009
2010
percentile
School Mean as percentile
SFO Percentile range
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
2008-10
mea
n sc
aled
sco
re g
row
th
School Mean Growth State Mean Growth
School Trendline*
0 20 40 60 80 100
2008-10
percentile
School Mean Growth as percentile
Notes: * The school trendline is only plotted when there is data for each calendar year.
** % student participation = students who participated in NAPLAN (not absent / withdrawn but including exempt) / total number of students (including exempt / absent / withdrawn).
† The Matched Cohort total includes students who wereabsent, withdrawn or exempt in either calendar year.
Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 5/03/2011Page 22 of 33
AIM Year 3 and 5: Reading (discontinued at the end of 2007)
School no:School name: Doreen Primary SchoolSource of data: Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority.
Explanation: The Achievement Improvement Monitor (AIM) was a statewide assessment program conducted each year up until and including 2007 for students in Years 3, 5, 7 and 9. This has now been replaced by NAPLAN.
For more detailed AIM data, refer to the NAPLAN Data Service website at http://aimds.vcaa.vic.edu.au.
Year 3 Year 5
(n) (%)** Lev1 Lev2 Lev3 Lev4 Lev5 Lev6 Lev6E School State (n) (%)** Lev1 Lev2 Lev3 Lev4 Lev5 Lev6 Lev6E School State2003 4 80 0 25 50 25 0 0 0 2.5 2.3 2003 6 100 0 0 0 17 83 0 0 4.3 3.22004 4 133 0 25 50 25 0 0 0 2.7 2.3 2004 4 100 0 25 25 0 50 0 0 3.2 3.22005 6 86 0 0 67 33 0 0 0 2.9 2.4 2005 6 100 0 0 33 33 33 0 0 3.5 3.22006 5 96 0 0 80 20 0 0 0 2.7 2.3 2006 4 100 0 0 25 50 25 0 0 3.5 3.12007 12 85 8 8 50 33 0 0 0 2.6 2.3 2007 8 100 0 0 38 50 13 0 0 3.2 3.2
Percent of students by VELS level Percent of students by VELS level
Percent of students by VELS level Percent of students by VELS level
945
Mean VELS Score Mean VELS Scorestudent participation student participation
60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
perc
ent
* The school trendline is only plotted when there is data for each calendar year.
** % student participation = (students who participated in AIM / Feb enrolments) * 100
60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
perc
ent
Notes:
Year 3 Year 5School Mean against State Mean, School Mean as percentile against School Mean against State Mean, School Mean as percentile againstincluding Participation SFO percentile range including Participation SFO percentile range
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
perc
ent
% >=Lev3 School Trendline*% Lev1 % Lev2 % Lev3 % >=Lev4
0
25
50
75
100
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
perc
ent
stud
ent
part
icip
atio
n
mea
n V
ELS
sco
re
School Mean Score State Mean Score
School Trendline* Student Participation**
0 20 40 60 80 100
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2004-2007
percentile
School Mean as percentile SFO Percentile range
* The school trendline is only plotted when there is data for each calendar year.
** % student participation = (students who participated in AIM / Feb enrolments) * 100
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
perc
ent
% >=Lev4 School Trendline*% <=Lev2 % Lev3 % Lev4 % >=Lev5
0
25
50
75
100
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
perc
ent
stud
ent
part
icip
atio
n
mea
n V
ELS
sco
re
School Mean Score State Mean ScoreSchool Trendline* Student Participation**
0 20 40 60 80 100
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2004-2007
percentile
School Mean as percentile SFO Percentile range
Notes:
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
perc
ent
% >=Lev3 School Trendline*% Lev1 % Lev2 % Lev3 % >=Lev4
0
25
50
75
100
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
perc
ent
stud
ent
part
icip
atio
n
mea
n V
ELS
sco
re
School Mean Score State Mean Score
School Trendline* Student Participation**
0 20 40 60 80 100
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2004-2007
percentile
School Mean as percentile SFO Percentile range
* The school trendline is only plotted when there is data for each calendar year.
** % student participation = (students who participated in AIM / Feb enrolments) * 100
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
perc
ent
% >=Lev4 School Trendline*% <=Lev2 % Lev3 % Lev4 % >=Lev5
0
25
50
75
100
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
perc
ent
stud
ent
part
icip
atio
n
mea
n V
ELS
sco
re
School Mean Score State Mean ScoreSchool Trendline* Student Participation**
0 20 40 60 80 100
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2004-2007
percentile
School Mean as percentile SFO Percentile range
Notes:
Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 5/03/2011Page 23 of 33
AIM Year 3 and 5: Number (discontinued at the end of 2007)
School no:School name: Doreen Primary SchoolSource of data: Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority.
Explanation: The Achievement Improvement Monitor (AIM) was a statewide assessment program conducted each year up until and including 2007 for students in Years 3, 5, 7 and 9. This has now been replaced by NAPLAN.
For more detailed AIM data, refer to the NAPLAN Data Service website at http://aimds.vcaa.vic.edu.au.
Year 3 Year 5
(n) (%)** Lev1 Lev2 Lev3 Lev4 Lev5 Lev6 Lev6E School State (n) (%)** Lev1 Lev2 Lev3 Lev4 Lev5 Lev6 Lev6E School State2003 5 100 0 20 60 20 0 0 0 2.7 2.4 2003 6 100 0 0 17 50 33 0 0 3.4 3.12004 4 133 0 0 75 25 0 0 0 2.6 2.4 2004 4 100 0 0 75 25 0 0 0 2.8 3.22005 6 86 0 17 50 33 0 0 0 2.7 2.4 2005 6 100 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 3.0 3.22006 5 96 0 20 0 80 0 0 0 2.9 2.4 2006 3 75 0 0 33 67 0 0 0 3.5 3.22007 12 85 8 0 42 50 0 0 0 2.8 2.4 2007 8 100 0 13 13 50 25 0 0 3.5 3.2
Percent of students by VELS level Percent of students by VELS level
Mean VELS Score
945
student participation Percent of students by VELS level Percent of students by VELS levelMean VELS Score student participation
60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
perc
ent
60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
perc
ent
* The school trendline is only plotted when there is data for each calendar year.
** % student participation = (students who participated in AIM / Feb enrolments) * 100
Notes:
Year 3 Year 5School Mean against State Mean, School Mean as percentile against School Mean against State Mean, School Mean as percentile againstincluding Participation SFO percentile range including Participation SFO percentile range
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
perc
ent
% >=Lev3 School Trendline*% Lev1 % Lev2 % Lev3 % >=Lev4
0
25
50
75
100
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
perc
ent
stud
ent
part
icip
atio
n
mea
n V
ELS
sco
re
School Mean Score State Mean Score
School Trendline* Student Participation**
0 20 40 60 80 100
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2004-2007
percentile
School Mean as percentile SFO Percentile range
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
perc
ent
% >=Lev4 School Trendline*% <=Lev2 % Lev3 % Lev4 % >=Lev5
0
25
50
75
100
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
perc
ent
stud
ent
part
icip
atio
n
mea
n V
ELS
sco
re
School Mean Score State Mean ScoreSchool Trendline* Student Participation**
0 20 40 60 80 100
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2004-2007
percentile
School Mean as percentile SFO Percentile range
* The school trendline is only plotted when there is data for each calendar year.
** % student participation = (students who participated in AIM / Feb enrolments) * 100
Notes:
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
perc
ent
% >=Lev3 School Trendline*% Lev1 % Lev2 % Lev3 % >=Lev4
0
25
50
75
100
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
perc
ent
stud
ent
part
icip
atio
n
mea
n V
ELS
sco
re
School Mean Score State Mean Score
School Trendline* Student Participation**
0 20 40 60 80 100
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2004-2007
percentile
School Mean as percentile SFO Percentile range
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
perc
ent
% >=Lev4 School Trendline*% <=Lev2 % Lev3 % Lev4 % >=Lev5
0
25
50
75
100
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
perc
ent
stud
ent
part
icip
atio
n
mea
n V
ELS
sco
re
School Mean Score State Mean ScoreSchool Trendline* Student Participation**
0 20 40 60 80 100
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2004-2007
percentile
School Mean as percentile SFO Percentile range
* The school trendline is only plotted when there is data for each calendar year.
** % student participation = (students who participated in AIM / Feb enrolments) * 100
Notes:
Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 5/03/2011Page 24 of 33
Teacher Assessment of Student Progress (PSD students)School no: 945School name: Doreen Primary SchoolExplanation: Teachers assess their students' progress against the 8 VELS Domains using
a 6-point scale (students in special schools and those who cannot be assessedagainst the VELS).
Source of data: Data transmitted from school to DEECD via an online web-form.
Noprogress
Little progress
Satisfactory progress
Good progress
Very good progress
Excellent progress
Total students
assessed 1
(%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (no.)
2006EnglishMathematicsScienceICTThe ArtsH&PECivics & Citizenship
2007EnglishMathematicsScienceICTThe ArtsH&PECivics & Citizenship
2008EnglishMathematicsScienceICTThe ArtsH&PECivics & Citizenship
2009EnglishMathematicsScienceICTThe ArtsH&PECivics & Citizenship2010EnglishMathematicsScienceICTThe ArtsH&PECivics & Citizenship
2009 Primary state benchmarks*English 1 13 27 33 16 11Mathematics 2 14 26 29 16 13Science 3 12 40 22 12 10ICT 2 8 32 22 22 14The Arts 1 13 30 23 19 13H&PE 3 12 32 22 20 11Civics & Citizenship 2 11 44 22 11 10
Notes: 1 If schools provided percentages only, it is not possible to report the number of students assessed.In these cases, the total percentage (100) will be shown.
* 2010 benchmarks will be calculated in August, when data from all schools has been submitted.
Produced by Data, Outcomes andEvaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 9/03/2011Page 25 of 33
Teacher Assessment of Student Progress (PSD students)School no: 945School name: Doreen Primary School
Note: * 2010 benchmarks will be calculated inAugust, when data from all schools hasbeen submitted.
0
20
40
60
80
100
Noprogress
Little Satisfact. Good V. good Excellentprogress
percent Mathematics
0
20
40
60
80
100
Noprogress
Little Satisfact. Good V. good Excellentprogress
percent Science
0
20
40
60
80
100
Noprogress
Little Satisfact. Good V. good Excellentprogress
percent ICT
0
20
40
60
80
100
Noprogress
Little Satisfact. Good V. good Excellentprogress
percent The Arts
0
20
40
60
80
100
Noprogress
Little Satisfact. Good V. good Excellentprogress
percent H&PE
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2009 Primary state benchmarks*
0
20
40
60
80
100
Noprogress
Little Satisfact. Good V. good Excellentprogress
percent Civics & Citizenship
0
20
40
60
80
100
Noprogress
Little Satisfact. Good V. good Excellentprogress
percent English
Produced by Data, Outcomes andEvaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 9/03/2011Page 26 of 33
EnrolmentsSchool no: 945School name: Doreen Primary SchoolExplanation: Enrolments at February census.
Source of data: February census.
Year boys girls total boys girls total boys girls total1997 20 25 45 2 3 51998 21 20 41 3 31999 26 18 44 5 1 62000 17 14 31 1 12001 11 11 22 3 1 42002 14 10 24 2 1 32003 17 16 33 3 2 52004 21 22 43 7 3 102005 25 20 45 5 5 102006 26 26 52 5 6 112007 33 36 69 5 5 102008 36 55 91 8 19 272009 41 57 98 8 9 172010 40 58 98 6 12 18
Total school enrolment Prep enrolment Year 7 enrolments
60
80
100
120Total school enrolments by gender total
boys
girls
Produced by Data, Outcomes andEvaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 9/03/2011Page 27 of 33
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009
Total school enrolments by gender total
boys
girls
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009
Prep enrolments by gender total
boys
girls
Produced by Data, Outcomes andEvaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 9/03/2011Page 27 of 33Produced by Data, Outcomes andEvaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 9/03/2011Page 27 of 33
Student AbsenceSchool no: 945School name: Doreen Primary SchoolSource of data: Data retrieved electronically from CASES21.
Explanation: The average (mean) number of absent days† per FTE** student.
Note that 20 absent days equates to 1 absent day per fortnight, and 10 absent days to 1 absent day per month.E
nrol
men
ts
Avg
abs
ent
days
/ F
TE
**
stud
ent
Enr
olm
ents
Avg
abs
ent
days
/ F
TE
**
stud
ent
Enr
olm
ents
Avg
abs
ent
days
/ F
TE
**
stud
ent
Enr
olm
ents
Avg
abs
ent
days
/ F
TE
**
stud
ent
25th ptile Mean
75th ptile
Prep 10.6 15.6 26.7 9.2 17.8 8.2 19.3 15.6 12.0 14.7 18.0Yr 1 11.8 12.4 10.9 8.4 22.2 11.7 16.5 11.9 12.1 14.4 17.0Yr 2 13.3 8.5 12.0 9.2 8.0 11.6 22.0 10.7 11.6 14.0 16.6Yr 3 13.2 17.4 14.9 9.7 12.2 11 6.1 18 11.2 13.6 16.1Yr 4 7.4 15.6 14.0 20.1 16.5 13.2 8.9 8.2 11.3 13.7 16.0Yr 5 8.0 7.9 5.3 9 14.9 18.9 13.1 14.9 11.4 14.0 16.3Yr 6 6.0 7.8 8.0 13.8 5.0 7.9 13.0 14.1 11.9 14.4 16.8 Notes:
Ungraded 15.9
P-6 mean 12.5 11.2 12.1 13.1 14.1
Includes non-curriculum absences only (absence codes 200, 201, 202,203, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 300, 401, 500, 700, 800, 804,805, 900).The school trendline is only plotted when there is data for eachcalendar year.FTE = Full Time Equivalent (incuding part-time & part-year fractions).2010 benchmarks and percentiles will be calculated in August, when
20072009 state
benchmark^School
†
*
**^
2008 2009 2010
2007200820092010
2007200820092010
2007200820092010
2007200820092010
2007200820092010
20072008
Pre
pY
r 1
Yr
2Y
r 3
Yr
45
School Mean as percentile against SFO percentile range^
Improvement
Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 9/03/2011Page 28 of 33
data from all schools has been submitted.
0
5
10
15
20
25
20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
Prep Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6 Ungraded Prep-Yr6
Da
ys o
f ab
sen
ce p
er
FT
E**
stu
de
nt
.
School Mean against State Mean^
School Mean State Mean School Trendline*
Impr
ovem
ent
.
0 20 40 60 80 100
2007200820092010
2007200820092010
2007200820092010
2007200820092010
2007200820092010
2007200820092010
2007200820092010
2007200820092010
2007200820092010
Pre
pY
r 1
Yr
2Y
r 3
Yr
4Y
r 5
Yr
6U
ngra
ded
Pre
p-Y
r6
percentileSchool as percentile SFO Percentile range
School Mean as percentile against SFO percentile range^
Improvement
Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 9/03/2011Page 28 of 33Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 9/03/2011Page 28 of 33
Parent OpinionSchool no: 945 School Mean as percentile (by school type)School name: Doreen Primary SchoolExplanation: A self-completion questionnaire to obtain parents' opinions of the school. Parents rated a number of statements using
a scale where 1=strongly disagree & 7=strongly agree. The statements were grouped into the following categories.Source of data: Data scanned from questionnaires completed by parents
Variable Variable Variable
No. Name Year No. Name Year No. Name Year1 School Improvement 2008 6.29 5.74 7 Reporting 2008 6.30 5.56 13 Student Safety^ 2008 5.51 5.20
2009 6.29 5.75 2009 6.17 5.62 2009 5.74 5.212010 6.17 5.71 2010 6.22 5.62 2010 5.52 5.26
2 Approachability 2008 6.20 5.83 8 Learning Focus 2008 6.23 5.73 14 Classroom Behaviour^ 2008 4.43 4.202009 6.37 5.83 2009 6.36 5.74 2009 5.23 4.222010 6.14 5.82 2010 6.38 5.75 2010 5.13 4.21
3 Teacher Morale 2008 6.37 5.85 9 Transitions 2008 6.30 5.79 15 Connectedness to Peers 2008 5.96 5.852009 6.48 5.86 2009 6.38 5.80 2009 6.06 5.842010 6.28 5.88 2010 6.04 5.81 2010 6.02 5.85
4 Parent Input 2008 6.36 5.62 10 Extra Curricula 2008 5.59 5.19 16 Student Motivation 2008 6.04 5.722009 6.30 5.61 2009 5.28 5.19 2009 6.30 5.712010 6.02 5.53 2010 5.11 5.17 2010 6.11 5.73
5 Stimulating Learning 2008 6.33 5.84 11 Homework 2008 5.76 5.28 17 Social Skills 2008 6.13 5.812009 6.45 5.85 2009 5.80 5.29 2009 6.20 5.812010 6.26 5.86 2010 5.92 5.29 2010 6.21 5.81
6 Behaviour Management 2008 6.33 5.55 12 General Satisfaction 2008 6.52 5.91 18 School Connectedness 2008 6.26 5.862009 6.27 5.55 2009 6.64 5.92 2009 6.24 5.872010 6.03 5.52 2010 6.34 5.90 2010 6.22 5.88
School Mean against Primary State Mean
Notes: * The school trendline is plotted when there is data for each calendar year. ^^ Benchmarks available for Primary, Secondary, Pri/Sec, Special and SDS schools.
** If there were 6 or less respondents, table data is not shown for confidentiality reasons. If there were 3 or less respondents, graph data is not shown for confidentiality reasons.
^ Parents' responses to all negatively phrased questions have been reversed for reporting purposes. Across all variables, the higher the score or percentile rank, the more positive parents' perceptions.
State Primary median
School mean
School mean
School mean
State Primary median
State Primary median
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
School Improv.
Approa-chability
Teacher Morale
Parent Input
Stim. Learning
Beh. Manag.
Report-ing
Learning Focus
Tran-sitions
Extra Curricula
Home-work
General Satis.
Student Safety^
Class. Beh.^
Connect. to Peers
Student Motiv.
Social Skills
School Connect.
School Climate Student Behaviour^
StudentEngagement
1=st
rong
ly d
isag
ree,
7=
stro
ngly
agr
ee
School Mean State Median School Trendline*
Impr
ovem
ent
.
0 20 40 60 80 100
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
12
34
56
78
91
01
11
21
31
41
51
61
71
8
Sch
ool C
limat
eS
tud
ent
Beh
avio
ur^
Stu
den
tE
ng
agem
ent
percentileSchool Mean as percentile
Improvement
Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 9/03/2011Page 29 of 33
Staff Opinion School response rate** against Primary school distribution
School no: 945School name: Doreen Primary SchoolExplanation: A self-completion questionnaire to obtain the staff's opinions of the school. The survey was administered online using the School Organisational Health Questionnaire.Source of data: Data transmitted from school staff to DEECD via an online survey application.
Variable Variable Variable
No. Name YearSchool mean No. Name Year
School mean No. Name Year
School mean
1 2008 70.6 78.1 8 Appraisal & Recognition 2008 62.1 75.0 15 Learning Environment 2008 63.3 84.12009 83.3 79.1 2009 75.7 75.4 2009 80.4 85.1 No. invited2010 84.8 78.3 2010 85.6 74.8 2010 86.7 84.9 2008 13
2 2008 64.6 80.8 9 Professional Growth 2008 67.7 76.9 16 Student Misbehaviour 2008 6.3 20.0 2009 132009 76.3 80.9 2009 77.5 77.0 2009 1.2 18.9 2010 152010 82.3 80.3 2010 83.2 76.0 2010 1.0 18.1
3 2008 67.3 82.2 10 Curriculum Coordination 2008 55.5 77.9 17 Classroom Misbehaviour 2008 5.0 12.6 School Mean as percentile (by school type)2009 80.4 82.2 2009 76.8 78.6 2009 4.2 12.32010 86.8 81.5 2010 82.0 78.1 2010 4.3 12.3
4 2008 69.9 81.3 11 Effective Discipline Policy 2008 66.4 82.0 18 Excessive Work Demands 2008 33.0 41.72009 81.8 81.6 2009 90.2 82.5 2009 11.5 41.02010 91.5 81.4 2010 89.8 82.6 2010 19.3 42.2
5 2008 63.0 83.2 12 Student Orientation 2008 91.7 87.5 19 Individual Distress 2008 24.2 20.02009 74.7 83.2 2009 96.4 88.3 2009 15.3 18.52010 81.8 83.1 2010 97.9 88.3 2010 11.2 19.3
6 2008 69.3 77.4 13 Student Motivation 2008 84.4 79.5 20 School Distress 2008 35.9 26.72009 81.8 77.7 2009 96.4 80.4 2009 18.8 25.72010 86.4 76.8 2010 95.0 80.9 2010 13.2 27.3
7 2008 79.1 83.7 14 Student Decision-Making 2008 84.4 72.92009 85.0 84.2 2009 92.9 74.32010 90.9 83.9 2010 93.1 74.3
School Mean against Primary State Median
Notes: * The school trendline is only plotted when there is data for each calendar year.** If there were 6 or less respondents, table data is not shown for confidentiality reasons. If there were 3 or less respondents, graph data is not shown for confidentiality reasons.^ The higher the school mean, the more positive the outcome for variables 1 to 15. The lower the school mean, the more positive the outcome for variables 16 to 20.† The higher the school percentile, the more positive the outcome for all variables.
^^ Benchmarks are available for Primary, Secondary, Pri/Sec, Special & SDS schools.
State Primary median
Individual Morale
State Primary median
State Primary median
Goal Congruence
Participative Decision-Making
School Morale
Supportive Leadership
Role Clarity
Professional Interaction
11
85%92%73%
No. of respondents Response Rate1112
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
08
20
09
20
10
Individual Morale
School Morale
Supportive Leadership
Role Clarity
Professional Interaction
Participative Decision-Making
Goal Congruence
Appraisal & Recognition
Professional Growth
Curriculum Coordination
Effective Discipline
Policy
Student Orientation
Student Motivation
Student Decision-Making
Learning Environment
Student Mis-behaviour
Classroom Mis-behaviour
Excessive Work
Demands
Individual Distress
School Distress
MOTIVATION EMPATHY CLARITY ENGAGEMENT LEARNING OUTCOMES MOTIVATION
School Mean State Median School Trendline*
Impr
ovem
ent ̂
.
Element:
Impr
ovem
ent ̂
.
0
20
40
60
80
100
2008 2009 2010
Re
spo
nse
Ra
te (
%)
0 20 40 60 80 100
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
Mo
tivat
ion
Em
-pa
thy
Cla
rity
Eng
agem
ent
Lear
ning
Out
com
esM
otiv
atio
n
percentileSchool Mean as percentile
Improvement † .
Legend:
State 90th percentile
State 75th percentile
State Median
State 25th percentile
State 10th percentileSchool
Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 9/03/2011Page 30 of 33
Performance & Development Culture (P&DC)††
School no: 945School name: Doreen Primary SchoolExplanation: The data on this page refers to the Staff Opinion Survey.
Source of data: Data transmitted from school staff to DEECD via an online survey application.
School Mean against Primary State Median
Notes:†† An assessment of the correlation between the P&DC Questionnaire and the Staff Opinion Survey was undertaken using data from Victorian Government schools that completed both surveys from .
2005 to 2007 (ie. 699 schools). This led to the identification of the components of the Staff Opinion Survey that could be used to assist schools with the ongoing monitoring of their performance .and development culture. Refer to the P&DC website for further information: http://www.education.vic.gov.au/management/schoolimprovement/panddc/default.htm. For numerical results .relating to the above graph, refer to the Staff Opinion Survey page in this report. .
† Note that there is no significant correlation between the Staff Opinion Survey and P&DC elements 1 (Induction) and 3 (Customised Individual Development Plans). .^ The P&DC threshold was derived from the P&DC Questionnaire 'percent favourable' methodology where a school is considered at the standard of accreditation when their Element score is >75% .
favourable (ie. at least 75% of staff selected the top two response categories in the P&DC Questionnaire). .* The school trendline is only plotted when there is data for each calendar year. .
** If there were 3 or less respondents, graph data is not shown for confidentiality reasons. .^^ Benchmarks are available for Primary, Secondary, Pri/Sec, Special & SDS schools. .
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
10020
08
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
Professional Interaction
Appraisal & Recognition
Learning Environment
Appraisal & Recognition
Learning Environment
Goal Congruence
Professional Growth
Professional Interaction
Appraisal & Recognition
Learning Environment
Goal Congruence
Participative Decision-Making
ELEMENT 1†:INDUCTION
ELEMENT 2:MULTIPLE SOURCES
OF FEEDBACK
ELEMENT 3†:CUSTOMISED
INDIVIDUALDEV PLANS
ELEMENT 4:QUALITY PROFESSIONAL
DEVELOPMENT
ELEMENT 5:STAFF BELIEF IN PERFORMANCE &
DEVELOPMENT CULTURE
School Mean State Median School Trendline* P&DC threshold^
Impr
ove
men
t .
Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 9/03/2011Page 31 of 33
Staff Sick LeaveSchool no:School name: Doreen Primary SchoolExplanation: The number of non-certificated and total sick leave days taken per staff member. A detailed
explanation on how staff sick leave is calculated is provided at: www.education.vic.gov.au/
management/schoolimprovement/performancedata/performancereportsfaq.htm.Source of data: Human Resources Management System (HRMS)^.
Non-Certificated sick leave days per staff member^
Staff Type2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008** 2009** 2010**
2010 State Median**
Teacher 1.00 0.26 1.67 0 0 0.29 1.33 1.42ES^^ 0 0 0 1.00 0.51 0.51 0.97
Total sick leave days per staff member^
Staff Type2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008** 2009** 2010**
2010 State Median**
Teacher 1.00 0.26 3.44 1.25 0.88 1.25 2.32 3.09ES^^ 0 0 0 1.00 0.51 5.05 1.95
NON-CERTIFICATED sick leave
945
2010 data will be available from March 2011.
2010 data will be available from March 2011.
0 5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
days
per
sta
ff m
embe
r .
TOTAL sick leave
Notes:* The school trendline is only plotted when there is data for each calendar year.
** The way in which sick leave data are calculated changed in 2008. As such, data from2008 cannot be compared with previous years.
^ There may be some discrepancy between the results from CASES21 and those fromHRMS. The latter are considered to be more accurate.
^^ Data for ES (Education Support) staff is only available from 2003.
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
**
2009
**
2010
**
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
**
2009
**
2010
**
Teaching staff ES staff^^
avg
days
per
sta
ff m
embe
r .
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
**
2009
**
2010
**
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
**
2009
**
2010
**
Teaching staff ES staff^^
avg
days
per
sta
ff m
embe
r .
Legend: State 90th percentile
State 75th percentile
State Median
State 25th percentile
State 10th percentile
School
School Trendline*
Produced by Data, Outcomes andEvaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 9/03/2011Page 32 of 33
Bank BalancesSchool no: 945School name: Doreen Primary SchoolExplanation: Account balance figures include official and investment accounts, and are
calculated by taking the opening balance at 1st January plus the total receiptsat 31st December less total payments at 31st December.
Account Balances (Official plus Investment Accounts)2003 $39,230 2007 $76,7152004 $42,421 2008 $16,7332005 $44,889 2009 $33,8192006 $21,832 2010 $195,770
Account Balances
$0
$50,000
$100,000
$150,000
$200,000
$250,000
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Account Balances (Official plus Investment Accounts) per student†
2003 $1,182 2007 $1,0932004 $918 2008 $1862005 $1,064 2009 $3492006 $426 2010 $1,977
School account balances per student enrolled in August census plotted on state Primary benchmarks^
Legend:
Notes:* The school trendline is only plotted when there is data for each calendar year.† The account balance per student has been calculated to enable some comparison to be made between schools.^ Benchmarks for primary, secondary, pri/sec, SDS, special and language schools. 2010 benchmarks will be calculated in August, when data from all schools has been submitted.
$0
$50,000
$100,000
$150,000
$200,000
$250,000
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
$4,000
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
90th percentile
75th percentile
Median
25th percentile
10th percentile
School
School Trendline*
Produced by Data, Outcomes andEvaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 9/03/2011Page 33 of 33