Douglass Valley ElementaryBeth Dowdy EDLS 695

DVE Characteristics – Ethnic/Racial American Indian/Pacific = 1% African American = 7% Hispanic = 16% White = 64% Multiple Races = 11%

Minority Groups = 35%

DVE Characteristics – Free & Reduced

2006 – 2007 15%2007 – 2008 17%2008 – 2009 25%2009 – 2010 26% 2010 – 2011 33%2011 – 2012 31%

DVE Characteristics - Mobility

2007 – 2009: 50% Mobility

2010 – 2011 56% Mobility

2011 CSAP 3rd Grade ReadingCSAP Results 2011

School Name Student Count%U %PP %P %A %PA %NS %Last Yr ChangeCHINOOK TRAIL ELEM 43 2% 2% 81% 14% 95% 0% 92% 3DISCOVERY CANYON 84 0% 5% 86% 10% 95% 0% 93% 2EDITH WOLFORD ELEM 52 0% 6% 85% 10% 94% 0% 69% 25MOUNTAIN VIEW ELEM 111 1% 6% 78% 14% 93% 0% 95% -2THE DA VINCI ACADEMY 71 1% 7% 86% 6% 92% 0% 87% 5ROCKRIMMON ELEM 45 7% 2% 76% 16% 91% 0% 87% 4EXPLORER ELEM 80 5% 5% 80% 10% 90% 0% 89% 1ACADEMY INTERNATIONAL ELEM97 4% 7% 84% 5% 89% 0% 96% -7FOOTHILLS ELEM 75 4% 7% 88% 1% 89% 0% 83% 6THE CLASSICAL ACADEMY ELEM235 2% 9% 82% 7% 89% 0% 93% -4ACADEMY DISTRICT 20 1556 4% 10% 79% 7% 87% 0% 86% 1DOUGLASS VALLEY ELEM 50 6% 8% 82% 4% 86% 0% 87% -1WOODMEN-ROBERTS ELEM 54 4% 11% 80% 6% 85% 0% 96% -11ANTELOPE TRAILS ELEM 83 2% 13% 78% 6% 84% 0% 88% -4RANCH CREEK ELEM 74 1% 12% 73% 11% 84% 3% 85% -1ACADEMY ENDEAVOUR ELEM102 7% 12% 75% 7% 81% 0% 88% -7HIGH PLAINS ELEM 62 5% 15% 81% 0% 81% 0% 70% 11FRONTIER ELEM 73 7% 14% 74% 5% 79% 0% 68% 11PRAIRIE HILLS ELEM 82 9% 12% 74% 5% 79% 0% 81% -2COLORADO 61832 9% 17% 67% 6% 73% 0% 70% 3PIONEER ELEM 83 5% 24% 66% 4% 70% 1% 71% -1

2011 CSAP 4th Grade Reading

CSAP Results 2011School Name Student Count%U %PP %P %A %PA %NS %Last Yr ChangeWOODMEN-ROBERTS ELEM51 0% 2% 80% 18% 98% 0% 89% 9ACADEMY INTERNATIONAL ELEM105 1% 7% 80% 12% 92% 0% 88% 4MOUNTAIN VIEW ELEM 85 1% 7% 75% 16% 92% 0% 87% 5CHINOOK TRAIL ELEM 40 5% 5% 73% 18% 90% 0% 96% -6THE CLASSICAL ACADEMY ELEM241 2% 8% 82% 8% 90% 0% 88% 2PRAIRIE HILLS ELEM 98 0% 11% 77% 12% 89% 0% 91% -2ANTELOPE TRAILS ELEM 86 2% 12% 80% 6% 86% 0% 84% 2EXPLORER ELEM 86 2% 12% 79% 7% 86% 0% 91% -5DISCOVERY CANYON 82 2% 13% 76% 9% 84% 0% 82% 2ROCKRIMMON ELEM 74 7% 12% 70% 11% 81% 0% 77% 4FOOTHILLS ELEM 70 3% 17% 77% 3% 80% 0% 80% 0THE DA VINCI ACADEMY 77 4% 17% 75% 4% 79% 0% 81% -2ACADEMY ENDEAVOUR ELEM96 6% 15% 77% 1% 78% 1% 82% -4FRONTIER ELEM 69 4% 17% 75% 3% 78% 0% 80% -2RANCH CREEK ELEM 57 5% 18% 74% 4% 77% 0% 75% 2EDITH WOLFORD ELEM 99 6% 18% 60% 16% 76% 0% 91% -15PIONEER ELEM 83 14% 18% 64% 2% 66% 1% 69% -3DOUGLASS VALLEY ELEM 68 7% 29% 59% 4% 63% 0% 76% -13HIGH PLAINS ELEM 49 16% 22% 57% 4% 61% 0% 66% -5

2011 CSAP 5th Grade Reading

CSAP Results 2011School Name Student Count%U %PP %P %A %PA %NS %Last Yr ChangeCHINOOK TRAIL ELEM 40 0% 5% 68% 28% 95% 0% 86% 9ACADEMY INTERNATIONAL ELEM101 2% 5% 77% 16% 93% 0% 93% 0MOUNTAIN VIEW ELEM 115 4% 4% 68% 23% 91% 0% 90% 1THE CLASSICAL ACADEMY ELEM226 0% 9% 80% 10% 90% 0% 86% 4WOODMEN-ROBERTS ELEM50 4% 4% 68% 22% 90% 2% 87% 3ANTELOPE TRAILS ELEM 93 2% 9% 76% 12% 88% 1% 94% -6EXPLORER ELEM 86 3% 10% 74% 12% 86% 0% 93% -7DISCOVERY CANYON 106 5% 9% 79% 5% 84% 2% 89% -5EDITH WOLFORD ELEM 55 11% 5% 75% 9% 84% 0% 85% -1FRONTIER ELEM 56 4% 13% 75% 9% 84% 0% 72% 12FOOTHILLS ELEM 77 6% 10% 70% 13% 83% 0% 86% -3PRAIRIE HILLS ELEM 114 8% 9% 74% 10% 83% 0% 74% 9THE DA VINCI ACADEMY 86 5% 13% 73% 9% 83% 0% 88% -5RANCH CREEK ELEM 67 3% 15% 76% 6% 82% 0% 90% -8ACADEMY ENDEAVOUR ELEM120 5% 15% 70% 10% 80% 0% 85% -5DOUGLASS VALLEY ELEM 65 11% 9% 74% 6% 80% 0% 80% 0ROCKRIMMON ELEM 67 7% 13% 64% 13% 78% 1% 81% -3PIONEER ELEM 81 12% 16% 68% 4% 72% 0% 74% -2HIGH PLAINS ELEM 73 19% 18% 62% 1% 63% 0% 79% -16

2011 CSAP 3rd Grade Writing

CSAP Results 2011School Name Student Count%U %PP %P %A %PA %NS %Last Yr ChangeROCKRIMMON ELEM 45 2% 11% 71% 16% 87% 0% 72% 15CHINOOK TRAIL ELEM 43 0% 14% 74% 12% 86% 0% 71% 15THE DA VINCI ACADEMY 71 0% 18% 63% 17% 80% 1% 69% 11EXPLORER ELEM 80 3% 20% 60% 18% 78% 0% 77% 1DISCOVERY CANYON 84 1% 21% 68% 10% 77% 0% 76% 1WOODMEN-ROBERTS ELEM54 0% 24% 69% 7% 76% 0% 75% 1MOUNTAIN VIEW ELEM110 1% 24% 57% 18% 75% 0% 82% -7RANCH CREEK ELEM 75 1% 24% 67% 8% 75% 0% 67% 8ACADEMY INTERNATIONAL ELEM97 1% 25% 60% 14% 74% 0% 82% -8ANTELOPE TRAILS ELEM 84 0% 27% 57% 15% 73% 0% 66% 7THE CLASSICAL ACADEMY ELEM235 0% 29% 60% 10% 70% 0% 72% -2EDITH WOLFORD ELEM 53 2% 34% 55% 9% 64% 0% 40% 24ACADEMY ENDEAVOUR ELEM102 3% 35% 56% 6% 62% 0% 58% 4DOUGLASS VALLEY ELEM49 0% 39% 49% 12% 61% 0% 71% -10FOOTHILLS ELEM 75 3% 39% 53% 5% 59% 0% 62% -3HIGH PLAINS ELEM 62 2% 44% 48% 6% 55% 0% 46% 9PRAIRIE HILLS ELEM 83 4% 43% 46% 7% 53% 0% 57% -4PIONEER ELEM 82 5% 49% 41% 5% 46% 0% 37% 9FRONTIER ELEM 73 3% 55% 33% 10% 42% 0% 59% -17

2011 CSAP 4th Grade WritingCSAP Results 2011

School Name Student Count%U %PP %P %A %PA %NS %Last Yr ChangeWOODMEN-ROBERTS ELEM51 0% 10% 67% 24% 90% 0% 83% 7ACADEMY INTERNATIONAL ELEM105 0% 12% 62% 26% 88% 0% 72% 16CHINOOK TRAIL ELEM 40 3% 10% 63% 25% 88% 0% 83% 5DISCOVERY CANYON 82 1% 13% 66% 20% 85% 0% 68% 17MOUNTAIN VIEW ELEM 85 1% 14% 46% 39% 85% 0% 83% 2ANTELOPE TRAILS ELEM 86 1% 23% 57% 19% 76% 0% 76% 0FOOTHILLS ELEM 70 1% 23% 60% 16% 76% 0% 71% 5THE CLASSICAL ACADEMY ELEM241 0% 23% 61% 15% 76% 0% 69% 7RANCH CREEK ELEM 57 2% 25% 58% 16% 74% 0% 58% 16THE DA VINCI ACADEMY 77 0% 26% 53% 21% 74% 0% 67% 7EXPLORER ELEM 86 1% 29% 59% 10% 70% 0% 82% -12ROCKRIMMON ELEM 74 4% 24% 47% 23% 70% 1% 64% 6ACADEMY ENDEAVOUR ELEM96 3% 27% 60% 8% 69% 1% 60% 9FRONTIER ELEM 69 0% 33% 57% 10% 67% 0% 61% 6EDITH WOLFORD ELEM 99 3% 31% 37% 28% 66% 0% 77% -11PRAIRIE HILLS ELEM 98 2% 35% 51% 12% 63% 0% 71% -8PIONEER ELEM 83 7% 39% 45% 10% 54% 0% 39% 15HIGH PLAINS ELEM 49 4% 43% 47% 6% 53% 0% 47% 6DOUGLASS VALLEY ELEM 68 9% 44% 34% 13% 47% 0% 60% -13

2011 CSAP 5th Grade WritingCSAP Results 2011

School Name Student Count%U %PP %P %A %PA %NS %Last Yr ChangeCHINOOK TRAIL ELEM 40 0% 10% 68% 23% 90% 0% 73% 17ACADEMY INTERNATIONAL ELEM101 0% 11% 59% 30% 89% 0% 86% 3MOUNTAIN VIEW ELEM 115 1% 10% 63% 26% 89% 0% 82% 7ANTELOPE TRAILS ELEM 93 2% 13% 62% 22% 84% 1% 80% 4WOODMEN-ROBERTS ELEM 50 0% 14% 64% 20% 84% 2% 77% 7THE CLASSICAL ACADEMY ELEM226 1% 20% 65% 14% 79% 0% 71% 8EXPLORER ELEM 86 0% 26% 60% 14% 74% 0% 79% -5PRAIRIE HILLS ELEM 114 2% 25% 63% 10% 73% 0% 63% 10DISCOVERY CANYON 106 2% 26% 60% 9% 70% 2% 80% -10FOOTHILLS ELEM 77 0% 30% 47% 23% 70% 0% 82% -12FRONTIER ELEM 56 0% 30% 45% 25% 70% 0% 65% 5EDITH WOLFORD ELEM 55 2% 29% 62% 7% 69% 0% 71% -2RANCH CREEK ELEM 67 1% 30% 58% 10% 69% 0% 76% -7ROCKRIMMON ELEM 67 1% 28% 52% 16% 69% 1% 69% 0ACADEMY ENDEAVOUR ELEM 120 3% 30% 48% 18% 67% 0% 69% -2DOUGLASS VALLEY ELEM 65 2% 32% 55% 11% 66% 0% 63% 3THE DA VINCI ACADEMY 86 2% 31% 52% 14% 66% 0% 81% -15PIONEER ELEM 81 4% 35% 48% 14% 62% 0% 63% -1HIGH PLAINS ELEM 73 8% 37% 45% 10% 55% 0% 68% -13

2011 CSAP 3rd Grade MathCSAP Results 2011

School Name Student Count%U %PP %P %A %PA %NS %Last Yr ChangeDISCOVERY CANYON 84 0% 5% 43% 52% 95% 0% 93% 2CHINOOK TRAIL ELEM 43 0% 7% 51% 42% 93% 0% 87% 6MOUNTAIN VIEW ELEM110 1% 7% 46% 45% 92% 0% 94% -2ROCKRIMMON ELEM 45 4% 7% 36% 53% 89% 0% 90% -1THE CLASSICAL ACADEMY ELEM235 0% 11% 39% 49% 89% 0% 94% -5ACADEMY INTERNATIONAL ELEM97 3% 10% 40% 46% 87% 0% 95% -8THE DA VINCI ACADEMY 71 1% 10% 31% 56% 87% 1% 83% 4WOODMEN-ROBERTS ELEM54 2% 11% 46% 41% 87% 0% 82% 5ANTELOPE TRAILS ELEM 84 4% 13% 42% 42% 83% 0% 89% -6DOUGLASS VALLEY ELEM49 6% 12% 37% 45% 82% 0% 78% 4FRONTIER ELEM 73 3% 15% 47% 36% 82% 0% 81% 1ACADEMY ENDEAVOUR ELEM102 5% 16% 44% 35% 79% 0% 83% -4RANCH CREEK ELEM 74 4% 20% 45% 31% 76% 0% 85% -9EDITH WOLFORD ELEM 53 2% 25% 43% 30% 74% 0% 60% 14HIGH PLAINS ELEM 62 3% 24% 45% 27% 73% 0% 63% 10PIONEER ELEM 82 5% 22% 48% 26% 73% 0% 63% 10PRAIRIE HILLS ELEM 83 7% 23% 47% 23% 70% 0% 77% -7FOOTHILLS ELEM 75 12% 19% 33% 36% 69% 0% 85% -16EXPLORER ELEM 80 3% 6% 23% 43% 65% 26% 91% -26

2011 CSAP 4th Grade MathCSAP Results 2011

School Name Student Count%U %PP %P %A %PA %NS %Last Yr ChangeCHINOOK TRAIL ELEM 40 3% 3% 38% 58% 95% 0% 91% 4MOUNTAIN VIEW ELEM 85 2% 4% 36% 58% 94% 0% 90% 4ACADEMY INTERNATIONAL ELEM105 0% 7% 39% 54% 93% 0% 89% 4THE CLASSICAL ACADEMY ELEM241 1% 7% 47% 44% 92% 0% 91% 1WOODMEN-ROBERTS ELEM51 0% 8% 53% 39% 92% 0% 92% 0DISCOVERY CANYON 82 4% 6% 33% 57% 90% 0% 90% 0ANTELOPE TRAILS ELEM 86 1% 10% 53% 35% 88% 0% 89% -1ROCKRIMMON ELEM 74 5% 7% 34% 54% 88% 0% 79% 9ACADEMY ENDEAVOUR ELEM96 1% 14% 50% 35% 85% 0% 79% 6EXPLORER ELEM 86 3% 13% 40% 43% 83% 1% 90% -7PRAIRIE HILLS ELEM 98 2% 16% 51% 31% 82% 0% 83% -1THE DA VINCI ACADEMY 77 8% 10% 43% 39% 82% 0% 84% -2FOOTHILLS ELEM 70 3% 16% 44% 37% 81% 0% 88% -7FRONTIER ELEM 69 1% 20% 45% 33% 78% 0% 82% -4EDITH WOLFORD ELEM 100 6% 19% 38% 37% 75% 0% 86% -11RANCH CREEK ELEM 57 2% 25% 49% 25% 74% 0% 77% -3PIONEER ELEM 83 11% 20% 47% 22% 69% 0% 79% -10HIGH PLAINS ELEM 49 12% 24% 41% 22% 63% 0% 56% 7DOUGLASS VALLEY ELEM 68 7% 31% 40% 22% 62% 0% 75% -13

2011 CSAP 5th Grade MathCSAP Results 2011

School Name Student Count%U %PP %P %A %PA %NS %Last Yr ChangeMOUNTAIN VIEW ELEM 115 2% 4% 30% 64% 94% 0% 92% 2ACADEMY INTERNATIONAL ELEM101 3% 4% 36% 57% 93% 0% 94% -1THE CLASSICAL ACADEMY ELEM226 1% 8% 44% 47% 91% 0% 84% 7ANTELOPE TRAILS ELEM 93 5% 5% 39% 49% 88% 1% 82% 6WOODMEN-ROBERTS ELEM50 4% 8% 36% 50% 86% 2% 76% 10CHINOOK TRAIL ELEM 40 0% 15% 30% 55% 85% 0% 82% 3DISCOVERY CANYON 106 1% 12% 38% 47% 85% 2% 90% -5EXPLORER ELEM 86 2% 17% 36% 44% 80% 0% 85% -5FOOTHILLS ELEM 77 5% 16% 32% 47% 79% 0% 88% -9ACADEMY ENDEAVOUR ELEM120 4% 18% 38% 40% 78% 0% 88% -10THE DA VINCI ACADEMY 86 6% 16% 37% 41% 78% 0% 88% -10FRONTIER ELEM 56 5% 18% 25% 52% 77% 0% 75% 2EDITH WOLFORD ELEM 55 11% 13% 47% 29% 76% 0% 75% 1PRAIRIE HILLS ELEM 114 7% 17% 43% 33% 76% 0% 61% 15DOUGLASS VALLEY ELEM 65 8% 18% 35% 38% 74% 0% 63% 11ROCKRIMMON ELEM 67 6% 19% 34% 39% 73% 1% 74% -1RANCH CREEK ELEM 67 1% 28% 45% 25% 70% 0% 78% -8PIONEER ELEM 81 12% 20% 36% 32% 68% 0% 80% -12HIGH PLAINS ELEM 73 14% 32% 38% 15% 53% 1% 68% -15

DVE Performance Frameworks

2011

DVE Performance Frameworks

2011

DVE Performance Frameworks

2011

5/23/2012 DVE Year End Summary of Behavior Incident Reports

Number of Incidents per ChildTotal

unique 1261 622 203 174 95 66 17 58 19 0

10 111 312 013 014 015 016 017 018 019 1

62

2017

96

15

1 0 13

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

Number of Children with Number of Incidents

Budget Creative budgeting Generous classroom teacher allocations Money for professional development

opportunities available Resources to support tutoring programs

New budget cutting Para time and counselor hours, as well as interventionist hours

Negatively affecting staff morale

Discipline Clear school-wide behavior expectations Behavior expectations taught in all areas of building

multiple times throughout the year Strong PBIS team with consistent meetings

Staff feels admin discipline actions are inconsistent/arbitrary

Distinction between office v classroom managed behaviors are unclear

Teachers would like more behavior management training

Parental Involvement Strong core volunteer group and PTO Multiple family fun night activities Bi-monthly newsletter/correspondence

Deployed family members inhibit parental involvement

Growing lower SES population-have led to decrease in parental involvement

High mobility rate

Student Achievement Adequate observed growth for 2011 in Reading

Writing and Math Intensive Literacy and Math Support Progress monitoring weekly for struggling students Piloting standards based report cards

Very little vertical team collaboration Teachers rarely using data to drive instruction Teachers need more training on use of assessment

results

School Climate Clean and inviting facility Excellent staff overall Unique military setting and support for

military families

Teachers not collaborating Complaints of favoritism Generational divide amongst staff

Rationale

Scantron is a valuable assessment when used with fidelity by teachers to drive their instruction. Student involvement with Scantron through goal setting and self-monitoring can increase student motivation, which can lead to buy-in and improved achievement

SMART Goal Increase Reading and Math SCANTRON

scores from 61% to 75% and 46% to 60% respectively, by improving school climate as reflected in PBIS SAS survey and School Climate survey.

Plan Of Action 

Students in 3rd through 5th grades will increase Reading Scantron scores from 61% -71% in the “above” or “far above” average category by the end of the 2012-2013 year 

Description of Proposed Action/Activity (What is going to be done to address this goal?)

Research/Rationale For Activity (Explain how best practices and research justify this

activity)

 Results(What will be the evidence of the

impact on the goal)

Person(s) Impacted

(Who will be involved?)

Resources(Funding Source &

Cost)

Timeline(When will the activity occur?)

-Review previous years Scantron scores-Set goals for next year-Review 2012-13 Plan-Formative Assessment PD-summer learning Institute D-2

-Know where we are data wise-Teacher buy in

 Teachers onboard and ready to use Scantron with fidelity 

 3-5 grade teachers, Assessment School Coach (ASC), Admin.

 .No costASC will train 

May-June 2012 

-Scantron needs assessment administered to 3-5th grade teachers-Scantron training based on needs assessment results-Goal setting training for teachers-Goal setting for students

-Teachers must be trained for Scantron to be effective-Assessment goal setting by students has proven to increase test scores and student buy-in 

-Teachers will use Scantron to the fullest of its capabilities 

-3-5 grade teachers and students, ASC 

-No CostIn house training and team collaboration 

August 2012 

-Scantron Testing Grades 3-5 

-District testing window  

-All students will complete scantron in the allowed timeframe 

-Students and teachers grades 3-5, admin and ASC

-Yearly Scantron per seat charges

-September 2012 

-Analyze Scantron results/data in staff develop meeting-Train staff on Scantron resources for targeting instructions-Use data for grade level planning

-Teachers will be able to target instruction for students based on unachieved Scantron standards

-Targeted instruction planning/lessons-Anticipated greater achievement on winter Scantron

-Students and teachers grade3-5, ASC and admin.

-No CostIn house training and team collaboration

-October 2012 

Plan Of ActionPage 2

Students in 3rd through 5th grades will increase Reading Scantron scores from 61% -71% in the “above” or “far above” average category by the end of the 2012-2013 year 

Description of Proposed Action/Activity (What is going to be done to address this goal?)

Research/Rationale For Activity (Explain how best practices and research justify this

activity)

 Results(What will be the evidence of the

impact on the goal)

Person(s) Impacted

(Who will be involved?)

Resources(Funding Source &

Cost)

Timeline(When will the activity occur?)

-During team meetings, continued monitoring of standards being met-Continued use of Scantron resources to target specific standards not being met 

.-Using Scantron resources with fidelity to increase student ac  

-Students mastering standards not achieved on fall Scantron 

Students and teachers grade3-5, ASC and admin.  

-No cost 

-November 2012 

-Winter Scantron goal setting by students-During team meetings, continued monitoring of standards being met-Continued use of Scantron resources to target specific standards not being met 

-Assessment goal setting by students has proven to increase test scores and student buy-in and achievement 

-Improved Scantron score results for Winter testing 

-Students and teachers grade3-5, ASC, and admin 

-No Cost 

-December 2012 

Scantron Winter Testing -District testing window  

-All students will complete Scantron in the allowed timeframe 

-Students and teachers grades 3-5, admin and ASC and admin. 

-Yearly Scantron per seat charges cost 

January 2013 

-Analyze Scantron results/data in staff develop meeting-Review Scantron resources for targeting instruction-Use data for grade level planning meetings  

-Measure growth-Teachers will be able to target instruction for students based on unachieved Scantron standards

-Targeted instruction planning/lessons-Anticipated greater achievement on winter Scantron time frame

-Students and teachers grades 3-5, admin and ASC/admin.

No cost -February 2013

Plan Of ActionPage 3

Students in 3rd through 5th grades will increase Reading Scantron scores from 61% -71% in the “above” or “far above” average category by the end of the 2012-2013 year

 

Description of Proposed Action/Activity (What is going to be done to address this goal?)

Research/Rationale For Activity (Explain how best practices and

research justify this activity)

 Results(What will be the evidence of

the impact on the goal)

Person(s) Impacted

(Who will be involved?)

Resources(Funding Source

& Cost)

Timeline(When will the activity occur?)

-Student goal setting-During team meetings, continued monitoring of standards being met-Continued use of Scantron resources to target specific standards not being met 

-Students can monitor their progress or lack of progress, set goals and work to meet them 

-Thoughtful goal setting by students

-Improved Scantron score results for Winter testing

-Students and teachers grades 3-5, admin and ASC/admin. 

-No cost 

-March 2013 

Spring Scantron testing 

-District testing window 

-All students will complete Scantron in the allowed timeframe

 

-Students and teachers grades 3-5, admin and ASC/admin 

--Yearly Scantron per seat charges cost 

-April 2013 

Data review-Student goal setting evaluation-Refelection-staff survey-Planning for next year-Vertical team meetings to discuss gaps between grade levels and skills students may be lacking

-Evaluate if our plan was successful-Reflect on what went well and what did not-Students can see their progress and skills they need to work on 

-Improved Scantron scores-Students meeting standards-Staff survey results 

-Students and teachers grades 3-5, admin and ASC/admin

-No cost -May 2013

Douglass Valley Elementary