down-regulation of micrornas in type 2 diabetes implicates non-coding rna in insulin action

2
Down-regulation of microRNAs in type 2 diabetes implicates non-coding RNA in insulin action  1 Robin A McGregor, 1,2 Pernille Keller, 1 Iain Gallagher, 2 Anders R Nielsen, 2 Christian P Fischer, 2 Bente K Pedersen and 1 James A Timmons 1 School of Life Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK 2 Centre of Inflammation & Metabolism, University of Copenhagen, Denmark BACKGROUND Skeletal muscle insulin resistance is a hallmark of type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome. Microarray profiling has consistently failed to identify differentially expressed gene networks 1,2  and this includes our recent analysis (n=124, U133+2 Affymetrix arrays, unpublished observation). The lack of a modified global transcriptome in human type 2 diabetes patients suggests post-transcriptional regulation must play a role in the disease process. MicroRNAs are regulato rs of mRNA translation. miR-1, miR-133a and miR-206 are muscle specific and regulate muscle development 3,4 . It is plausible that microRNA modulation could help explain the lack of transcriptional changes in human skeletal muscle insulin resistance. Thus, we proposed that impairment in glucose tolerance is regulated at the post-transcriptional level by alterations in muscle miRNA expression. RESULTS . CONCLUSION We provide the first evidence for altered miRNA expression in human insulin resistance . There is a robust down-regulation of miR-133a (and miR-206) in skeletal muscle and this was strongly associated with clinical status. Gene ontology analysis of the 186 predicted targets of miR-133a (expressed in skeletal muscle) revealed plausible interactions with genes involved with the insulin signalling pathway and thus the disease process. METHODS Human skeletal muscle biopsies (n=30) were taken from 3 groups defined by glucose tolerance: type 2 diabetes (DM2), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) or normal glucose tolerance (Control). Participants were matched for age, BMI and VO 2max . Real-time PCR for the detection of microRNA expression Taqman™ MicroRNA assay (Applied Biosystems) which detects mature miRNA was used to measure the expression of miR-1, miR-133a, and miR-206. The miRNA expression levels were normalized to RNU48. All reactions were run singleplex and quantified using the  !Ct method. Data are expressed relative to healthy control subject values and analyzed using ANOVA to compare differences in  !Ct values between the three groups followed by a post-hoc t-test where appropriate to identify specific group differences. Expression of the miRNAs were plotted against metabolic parameters to identify possible correlations. For all analyses P <0.05 was considered significant. In the figures significant dif ferences are indicated by *** P <0.001, ** P <0.01, *P <0.05. Bioinformatics MicroRNA targets were obtained from PicTar ( http://pictar.bio.nyu.edu/ ) and TargetScan ( http://www.targetscan.org/ ). We used EASE ( http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov/home.jsp ) to examine the miRNA target lists for gene ontology enrichment using an FDR <0.05. This study was funded by The Chief Scientists Office, Scotl and (JT), P . Keller was funded by the Lundbeck Foundation. R.McGregor was funded by Heriot-Watt Universit y and The Physiologica l Society UK. We thank John Fox for excellent technical support. Subject Characteristics Type 2 diabetes Impaired Glucose Tolerance Healthy Control  Age 60.4 ±14 60.2 ±7.1 60.3 ±7.5 BMI 26.6 ±1.9 26.3 ±1.7 25.9 ±1.9 VO 2max  28.8 ±8.6 29.4 ±6.9 28.4 ±6.0 Fasting glucose 11.3 ±2.9*** 5.9 ±0.5** 5.0 ±0.4 2-h glucose 21.1 ±5.1*** 7.5 ±1.8** 5.1 ±1.6 HbA1c 8.3 ±1.3*** 5.8 ±0.2* 5.6 ±0.3 REFERENCES 1. Nguyenet al. (2006) Insulin resistance does not influence gene expression in skeletal muscle. Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 39: 457. 2. Moo thaet al. (2003) PGC-1" responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes. Nature Genetics, 3. Chenet al. (2006) The role of microRNA-1 and microRNA-133 in skeletal muscle proliferation and differentiation. Nature Genetics, 38: 228. 4. Rao et al. (2006) Myogenic factors that regulate expression of muscle-specific microRNAs. PNAS, 103: 8721.  34: 267. Figure 2. Expression of miR-133a and miR-206 downregulated in type 2 diabetes individuals Table 1. Subject Characteristics Figure 5. Main gene ontologies targeted by mi R-133a Figure 3. Fasting plasma glucose concentration associated with miR-133a expression Figure 4. Longer-term insulin resistance indicator associated with miR-133a expression GO CELLULAR COMPONENTS Intracellular organelle Organelle Envelope e.g. BNIP3L; COX6A1; MCL1; NUP153; RANBP2; TIMM17A; TIMM8A GO MOLECULAR FUNCTION Protein Binding Phosphoprotein phosphatase activity e.g.SOCS5; PTPN12; PTPRD; CDC42 miR-133a GO BIOLOGICAL PROCESSES Intracellular protein transport Protein Dephosphorylation e.g. CLTA; CLTC; GABARAPL1; RANBP2; SNX1; TIMM17A; TIMM8A; TRAM1; TRAM2

Upload: drrobin

Post on 18-Oct-2015

13 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Presented at the Keystone MicroRNA, and Non-Coding RNA Meeting, 25-30th March, Whistler, Canada.

TRANSCRIPT

  • Down-regulation of microRNAs in type 2 diabetes implicates non-coding RNA in insulin action

    1Robin A McGregor, 1,2Pernille Keller, 1Iain Gallagher, 2Anders R Nielsen, 2Christian P Fischer, 2Bente K Pedersen and 1James A Timmons

    1School of Life Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK 2Centre of Inflammation & Metabolism, University of Copenhagen, Denmark

    BACKGROUND Skeletal muscle insulin resistance is a hallmark of type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome. Microarray profiling has consistently failed to identify differentially expressed gene networks1,2 and this includes our recent analysis (n=124, U133+2 Affymetrix arrays, unpublished observation). The lack of a modified global transcriptome in human type 2 diabetes patients suggests post-transcriptional regulation must play a role in the disease process. MicroRNAs are regulators of mRNA translation. miR-1, miR-133a and miR-206 are muscle specific and regulate muscle development3,4. It is plausible that microRNA modulation could help explain the lack of transcriptional changes in human skeletal muscle insulin resistance. Thus, we proposed that impairment in glucose tolerance is regulated at the post-transcriptional level by alterations in muscle miRNA expression.

    RESULTS

    .

    CONCLUSION We provide the first evidence for altered miRNA expression in human insulin resistance. There is a robust down-regulation of miR-133a (and miR-206) in skeletal muscle and this was strongly associated with clinical status. Gene ontology analysis of the 186 predicted targets of miR-133a (expressed in skeletal muscle) revealed plausible interactions with genes involved with the insulin signalling pathway and thus the disease process.

    METHODS Human skeletal muscle biopsies (n=30) were taken from 3 groups defined by glucose tolerance: type 2 diabetes (DM2), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) or normal glucose tolerance (Control). Participants were matched for age, BMI and VO2max. Real-time PCR for the detection of microRNA expression Taqman MicroRNA assay (Applied Biosystems) which detects mature miRNA was used to measure the expression of miR-1, miR-133a, and miR-206. The miRNA expression levels were normalized to RNU48. All reactions were run singleplex and quantified using the Ct method. Data are expressed relative to healthy control subject values and analyzed using ANOVA to compare differences in Ct values between the three groups followed by a post-hoc t-test where appropriate to identify specific group differences. Expression of the miRNAs were plotted against metabolic parameters to identify possible correlations. For all analyses P