Download - 1 20/10/2004 Petroleum Development Oman Xxxxxxxxxxx (Audit Title) HSE MS Audit Xxxxxx (Period)
1 20/10/2004
Petroleum Development OmanPetroleum Development Oman
Xxxxxxxxxxx (Audit Title) Xxxxxxxxxxx (Audit Title)
HSE MS AuditHSE MS Audit
Xxxxxx (Period)Xxxxxx (Period)
2 20/10/2004
AgendaAgenda Audit teamAudit team Terms of referenceTerms of reference MethodologyMethodology ScheduleSchedule Audit opinionAudit opinion Classification of findingsClassification of findings Positives – Negatives Positives – Negatives Review of 8 HSE MS elementsReview of 8 HSE MS elements Audit follow-upAudit follow-up
3 20/10/2004
Team MembersTeam Members
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
4 20/10/2004
Terms of Reference 1Terms of Reference 1
Objective:Objective:
The objective of the audit is to The objective of the audit is to assess the effectiveness of the assess the effectiveness of the HSE Management System andHSE Management System and Operational ControlsOperational Controls in the in the xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
5 20/10/2004
Terms of Reference 2 (SCOPE)Terms of Reference 2 (SCOPE)Special attention will be given to:Special attention will be given to:
• Adherence to PDO HSE policiesAdherence to PDO HSE policies• The process used for preparation and validation of the HSE Assurance The process used for preparation and validation of the HSE Assurance
Statements as part of the Annual Assurance ProcessStatements as part of the Annual Assurance Process• Adherence to PDO Minimum Environmental Standards Adherence to PDO Minimum Environmental Standards • Processes for the identification of HSE-related legislative requirements, Processes for the identification of HSE-related legislative requirements,
their dissemination, and for confirming adherence to themtheir dissemination, and for confirming adherence to them• Completeness of the identification of HSE critical activities, roles, Completeness of the identification of HSE critical activities, roles,
responsibilities and competency requirements associated with HSE responsibilities and competency requirements associated with HSE critical activitiescritical activities
• Implementation of HSE training program’s to close competency gaps for Implementation of HSE training program’s to close competency gaps for those carrying out of HSE critical activitiesthose carrying out of HSE critical activities
• Availability and effectiveness of required procedures for the Availability and effectiveness of required procedures for the identification and control of all significant hazards and effects including identification and control of all significant hazards and effects including the demonstration of ALARPthe demonstration of ALARP
• Responsibilities, accountabilities and effectiveness of individual HSE Responsibilities, accountabilities and effectiveness of individual HSE tasks and targets and their contribution to continuous performance tasks and targets and their contribution to continuous performance improvementimprovement
6 20/10/2004
Terms of Reference 3 (SCOPE CONT’D)Terms of Reference 3 (SCOPE CONT’D)• Effectiveness in HSE data management and HSE performance Effectiveness in HSE data management and HSE performance
monitoringmonitoring• Effectiveness of HSE documentation and the processes for its Effectiveness of HSE documentation and the processes for its
disseminationdissemination• Effectiveness of controls with respect to safeguarding of asset Effectiveness of controls with respect to safeguarding of asset
integrityintegrity• Effectiveness of change control proceduresEffectiveness of change control procedures• Requirements for contractors to have an implemented HSE policy Requirements for contractors to have an implemented HSE policy
and MSand MS• Completeness of HSE CasesCompleteness of HSE Cases• Adequacy of emergency response procedures and contingency plansAdequacy of emergency response procedures and contingency plans• Confirmation that findings from audits, inspections and incident Confirmation that findings from audits, inspections and incident
investigations have been satisfactorily addressed, and closed out in investigations have been satisfactorily addressed, and closed out in an auditable processan auditable process
• Identification of significant gaps in the implementation of the HSE MS Identification of significant gaps in the implementation of the HSE MS which have not been recognised, or for which no prioritised and which have not been recognised, or for which no prioritised and resourced remediation plan is in place.resourced remediation plan is in place.
• Adequacy and monitoring of the Electrical Infrastructure HSE PlanAdequacy and monitoring of the Electrical Infrastructure HSE Plan
7 20/10/2004
StandardsStandards
The audit was conducted in accordance with The audit was conducted in accordance with methodology in EP95 0130 (December 1999)methodology in EP95 0130 (December 1999)
The Audit was conducted against the following The Audit was conducted against the following standards (in order of priority):standards (in order of priority):
Oman laws and regulations Oman laws and regulations
PDO HSE policy PDO HSE policy
PDO HSE-MS as documented in the HSE Code of PDO HSE-MS as documented in the HSE Code of Practice Manual CP-122Practice Manual CP-122
PDO standards and proceduresPDO standards and procedures
Group and SIEP HSE policies, commitments & Group and SIEP HSE policies, commitments & guidelines such as EP95 000guidelines such as EP95 000
8 20/10/2004
Areas VisitedAreas Visited
FacilitiesFacilitiesMaintenance, Operations and Construction activity taking Maintenance, Operations and Construction activity taking place in xxxxxxxxxxplace in xxxxxxxxxx
In particular:In particular:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
9 20/10/2004
Audit ProcessAudit Process
• Terms of referenceTerms of reference• Audit programmeAudit programme• EP95-0130 EP95-0130
FamiliarisationFamiliarisation
Review & TestingReview & Testing
ReportingReporting
Site visit Interviews Test findings
Drafting EditingReport
Finalisation Agree findingsPresentFindings
StudyDocumentation
TODAY!TODAY!
10 20/10/2004
ObjectivityObjectivityBalanced Team (Yes? Contractor!)Balanced Team (Yes? Contractor!)
xxxx, xxx, xxxx, xxx,
IndependenceIndependence Yes, one team member involved from audited Yes, one team member involved from audited
operationoperation
Defined ProcessDefined Process EP 95EP 95 0 00000
Standard ApproachStandard Approach 8 HSE-MS elements8 HSE-MS elements
Base questionnairesBase questionnaires
Standard evaluation sheetsStandard evaluation sheets
11 20/10/2004
Audit AssessmentAudit Assessment
Level of concernLevel of concern: : SpecificSpecific
Level of concernLevel of concern: : Overall scope forOverall scope for enhancementenhancement
GoodGood
FairFair
Level of concernLevel of concern: : Overall cause for Overall cause for concernconcern
Level of concernLevel of concern: : Overall cause for Overall cause for grave concerngrave concern
PoorPoor
Unacceptable Unacceptable
12 20/10/2004
123
Weakness Classification Matrix Weakness Classification Matrix People Assets Environ-
mentRepu-tation
Severity
0
1
2
3
4
5
Noinjury
Slightinjury
Minorinjury
Majorinjury
Singlefatality
Multiplefatalities
Nodamage
Slightdamage
Minordamage
Localdamage
Majordamage
Extensivedamage
Noeffect
Noimpact
Slighteffect
Slightimpact
Minoreffect
Minorimpact
Localisedeffect
Consider-able
impact
Majoreffect
Nationalimpact
Inter-nationalimpact
Massiveeffect
Never heard of in
EP industry
A
LowLow
MediumMedium
HighHigh
Has occurred in EP industry
B
Has occurred inthe audited OU
C DHappens
several times a year in the audited OU
EHappens
several times a year in the
audited facility
High: Though not serious, essential to be brought to Management attention. Includes medium weaknesses as repeat from previous reports.
Low: No major HSE impact at process level, correction will assure greater effectiveness/efficiency in process concerned.
Serious: Exposes OU to a major extent in terms of achievement of corporate HSE objectives or results.
Medium: Could result in perceptible and undesirable effect on achievement of HSE objectives.
SeriousSerious
13 20/10/2004
Audit OpinionAudit Opinion
Serious:Serious: 0 0
HighHigh:: 2 (Reporting) 2 (Reporting)
MediumMedium:: 1616
LowLow:: 9 9
Total:Total: 27 27
Overall Audit Opinion: Overall Audit Opinion: XXXXXXXX
14 20/10/2004
Audit OpinionAudit Opinion
0 0 0/F - 0 0 My - 0 F F - 0 F F/My My 1-2 - - - 0 My - - >2 - - -
Key: F = few <20 My = many >40
Findings Most Favourable Opinion S H M H+M Unacc. Poor Fair Good
15 20/10/2004
Classification of FindingsClassification of Findings
Each Finding is categorised as follows:Each Finding is categorised as follows:
1.1. Category:Category: People (P), Assets (A), Environment (E) or Reputation (R)People (P), Assets (A), Environment (E) or Reputation (R)
2.2. Severity level (from Weakness Classification Matrix):Severity level (from Weakness Classification Matrix): Serious (S), High (H), Medium (M) or Low (L) Serious (S), High (H), Medium (M) or Low (L)
3.3. Each Finding is assigned to one HSE MS elementEach Finding is assigned to one HSE MS element
4.4. A Finding is accompanied by the Significance and one A Finding is accompanied by the Significance and one or more Recommendations to address the gap.or more Recommendations to address the gap.
16 20/10/2004
Classification of FindingsClassification of Findings
Each Finding is categorised as follows:Each Finding is categorised as follows:
1.1. Category:Category: People (P), Assets (A), Environment (E) or Reputation (R)People (P), Assets (A), Environment (E) or Reputation (R)
2.2. Severity level (from Weakness Classification Matrix):Severity level (from Weakness Classification Matrix): Serious (S), High (H), Medium (M) or Low (L) Serious (S), High (H), Medium (M) or Low (L)
3.3. Each Finding is assigned to one HSE MS elementEach Finding is assigned to one HSE MS element
4.4. A Finding is accompanied by the Significance and one A Finding is accompanied by the Significance and one or more Recommendations to address the gap.or more Recommendations to address the gap.
17 20/10/2004
Findings ClassificationFindings Classification
Findings per HSE MS Element
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
1
0
1
3
0
6
5
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
4
2
1
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Leadership &Commitments
Policy & Strategic Objective
Organ. Res & Documents
HEMP
Planning and Procedure
Impelentation & monitoring
Audits
Review
Ele
men
ts
Number of findings
Serious
High
Meduim
Low
18 20/10/2004
Positive Findings Positive Findings
System Integrity is being maintained at high level.
Additional power requirements are being met in a timely manner
Role of CFDH is being discharged well. (Authorisation of Staff, Issue of Standards and Proceedures, Technical Support to Assets
20 20/10/2004
1: Leadership and Commitment1: Leadership and Commitment
PositivePositiveXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Area’s for improvementArea’s for improvementXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
21 20/10/2004
2: Policy & Strategic Objectives2: Policy & Strategic Objectives
PositivePositiveXXXXXXXXXXXX
Area’s for improvementArea’s for improvementXXXXXXXXXXXX
22 20/10/2004
3: Organisation, Responsibilities, 3: Organisation, Responsibilities, Resources, Standards and Documents Resources, Standards and Documents
PositivePositive XXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Area’s for improvementArea’s for improvement XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
23 20/10/2004
4: HEMP 4: HEMP PositivePositive XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Area’s for improvementArea’s for improvement XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
24 20/10/2004
5: Planning and Procedures5: Planning and ProceduresPositivePositive XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Area’s for improvementArea’s for improvement XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
25 20/10/2004
6: Implementation & Monitoring6: Implementation & Monitoring
PositivePositive XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Area’s for improvementArea’s for improvement XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
26 20/10/2004
7: Audit 7: Audit
PositivePositive XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Area’s for improvementArea’s for improvement XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
27 20/10/2004
8: Management Review8: Management Review
PositivePositive XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Area’s for improvementArea’s for improvement XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
28 20/10/2004
Audit Follow-UpAudit Follow-Up
Review findings and recommendationsReview findings and recommendationsIdentify action partiesIdentify action partiesAgree and prioritise actions, set XXXAgree and prioritise actions, set XXXResource actionsResource actionsDevelop implementation scheduleDevelop implementation scheduleSet-up reporting and review programmeSet-up reporting and review programmeMonitor follow-up progress to close outMonitor follow-up progress to close out
XXXXXX responsibilityresponsibility !!