Download - 1 EU food legislation affecting polyols EPA Technical Meeting – 13 October 2009, Brussels
1
EU food legislation affecting polyols
EPA Technical Meeting – 13 October 2009, Brussels
2
New Regulation on food additives – implementing measuresAnnex II - Food Categorisation System & transfer of polyolsAnnex III - Additives in polyolsRevision of purity criteria for polyolsReview of EFSA guidelines for R.A. of additives
EFSA re-evaluation of polyols
Article 13 claims related to polyols
Review of labelling legislation – definition of polyols
3
New Regulation on food additivesImplementing measures
4
Regulation Food Additives – implementation Annex II - Food Categorisation System
Finalisation of review of the FCS & transfer of existing authorisations now in the hands of MS (WP additives) EPA updated position sent to Commission in April
June-Dec 09: population Annex II by Sanco with help of MS – finalisation first draft
Sept - Oct. 09: ELC/CIAA informal consultation on several categoriesCorrections needed wrt polyols Still possibility to obtain inclusion of polyols used for properties other than
sweetening in Group I (QS additives)
Formal consultation: first half 2010
5
Regulation Food Additives – implementationAnnex II - Food Categorisation System
Sanco’s provisional calendar:
• Sept 2010: final draft Annex II• Oct-Nov 2010: Interservice consultation – Representation DG Enterprise?• Nov-Dec 2010: translations• Jan 2011: presentation SCFCAH – vote• EP scrutiny (2 months)• May 2011: adoption by Commission• June 2011: publication in OJEU of a Regulation amending Regulation (EC) 1333/2008
6
Regulation Food Additives – implementationAnnex III - Additives in polyols
Aim: population of Annex III – Part 2 “additives in additives”
Additives in polyols – request for “extension” of use sent to DG Sanco on 6 November 2008
Additives other than carriers in the following polyols:E 420 (i) sorbitol E 421 mannitolE 965 (i) maltitolE 967 xylitolE 968 erythritol
E N° Name Use as Maximum level of use (g/kg)
E 341 (iii) Tricalcium phosphate Anti-caking agent
10
E 551 Silicon dioxide Anticaking agent
10
E 552 Calcium silicate Anticaking agent
10
E 553a (i) Magnesium silicate Anticaking agent
10
E 553 a (ii) Magnesium trisilicate Anticaking agent
10
E 553 b Talc Anticaking agent
10
7
Regulation Food Additives – implementationAnnex III - Additives in polyols
First feedback from Sanco: EPA submission receivable Generalisation of the approach to all polyols possible:
to be in line with the “polyols” group of Annex II to future proof the entry, should a brand new polyol (powder) be authorised:
Polyols E341 iii, E551, E552, E553a, E553b @ 10 g/kg (as anticaking agents)
8
Regulation Food Additives – implementationAnnex III - Additives in polyols
Next steps: Summer: theoretical end of collection by Sanco of submissions for extension of
use for all additives Discussion with MS on Annex III: likely not before Dec. 09 Adoption by SCFCAH EP scrutiny (2 months) Adoption by Commission Regulation amending Regulation (EC) 1333/2008 - Date of application: 1 January
2011
9
Regulation Food Additives – implementationRevised purity criteria
Mid-December 08: EPA required changes were included in the ELC consolidation document sent to Sanco
June 09: EPA conf call with Sanco to explain the rationale behind the required changes, which are found “reasonable” by Sanco
Next step: presentation of draft revised purity criteria by Sanco to MS for endorsement Impact of Nanotechs discussion wrt size? ELC paper to oppose inclusion of size in
specs of non-nano additives
Adoption of Regulation by June 2011 (along with Annex II)
10
Regulation Food Additives – implementationReview of EFSA guidelines for R.A. of additives
As all food additives, polyols developed in future may have to comply with safety criteria different from the safety criteria in place today (assessment according to 2001 SCF guidelines)
July 2009: publication of EFSA general data requirements for risk assessment of food additives (consultation of ELC in March 09)
Inclusion of these data requirements in the Commission guidelines for authorisations of additives, to be available by 16 Dec.2010 at the latest
EFSA in depth review of the guidelines for R.A. of additives (genotoxicity, toxicokinetics, nanotechs…): by July 2011 - public consultation organised in 2010
11
EFSA re-evaluation of polyols
12
EFSA re-evaluation of polyols
July 2009: draft re-evaluation programme for targeted consultation polyols re-evaluated by 31 December 2020Unknown: IS & consumer organisationsStill time for EPA to collect available data – undertake gap analysis – carry out studies
(e.g. intake assessment)
Template for review of existing studies EPA 31/09
Next on the list: preservatives /antioxydants: 2009-2013
Publication of the final Re-evaluation Programme by 20 January 2010
13
Article 13 claims related to polyols
14
Article 13 claims related to polyolsSubstance Health relationship Compliance
with EFSA pre- screening (19 Jan. 09)
EFSA opinion
ID 618/2907 - Polyols Remineralisation of teeth OK Proposed for withdrawal from Art. 13.1 claims with no assessment
ID 619 - Polyols Low glycemic properties OK Not proposed for withdrawal, but not yet assessed
ID 463 - Carbohydrates – non cariogenic e.g. isomaltulose, tagatatose, polyols, polydextrose. Absence of, or low fermentable carbohydrates
Dental health OK Proposed for withdrawal from Art. 13.1 claims with no assessment
15
Article 13 claims related to polyols
June 2009: Sanco ad hoc WG on Art. 13 claimsNon cariogenic claims generally not sufficiently characterised to allow an assessment of
the claimed effectLow GI carbohydrate claims: lack of internationally recognised methods for characterising
GI indexDental health/non cariogenic claims are comparative claims
Eligibility to EFSA evaluation was questioned
Withdrawal of these claims from the list of claims to be evaluated by EFSA was considered
Request to MS to confirm eligibility of these claims
16
Article 13 claims related to polyols
August 2009: development of EPA position paper
Early Sept. 09: use of the paper towards Commission, MS & sister associations
14 Sept. 09: Commission WG on claims agreement to have a follow-up meeting with MS to review additional clarification and adjust EFSA list accordingly: 16 October
2 Oct. 09: Additional EPA clarification to Commission, MS & sister associations
6 Oct. 09: EFSA/EC/MS meeting
17
Article 13 claims related to polyols
General overview of the process14 July 09: despite industry’s lobby, confirmation of publications of EFSA opinions by
batches 1 October 2009: publication first batch: 94 opinions covering 523 claims Adoption of Community list of permitted Article 13 claims: progressive, statement re
interim list. First publication AFTER 31 Jan. 2010 (incl. EP scrutiny). In the meantime, claims may be made under the responsibility of the business operator
provided that they comply with Regulation (EC)1924/2006 – non misleading
18
Article 13 claims related to polyols
2010: if my polyol-related claim is accepted, what are the products that are allowed to bear it?
Nutrients profile (for nutrition (?) and health claims)Draft proposal Feb 2009: end IS consultation 2 March 3 negative opinions: SG, DG
Agri, DG EntAutumn: still under IS consultation – highly political – when (if) will it be published?Application to nutrition claims: subject to legal interpretation (industry/EC). Not
submitted for decision by SCOFCAH
19
Article 13 claims related to polyolsPossible impact of nutrients profile on the use of polyols
In latest drafts (Feb & 17 March 09), confectionery falls under “other foods”:10 g/100 g sugars2g /100 g saturated fatty acids300 mg/100 g sodium
Polyol-related health claims & chocolate re. SFAs Double labelling: “Protect teeth” & “High SFAs content”Interest for cocoa manufacturers???
Polyol-related nutrition claims (Annex I)“With no added sugars” “Sugars-free”OK interpretation that no need to mention SFAs content in this case. This is industry’s
interpretation, not necessarily all MS interpretation.
20
Review of labelling legislation
21
Review of labelling legislation
Proposed Regulation for the provision of food information to consumers
Definition of polyols
What is in: »Polyols means alcohols containing more than two hydroxyl groups »
What EPA wants to be in: « Polyols are defined as carbohydrates which are reduced mono-, di-, oligo- or poly-saccharides and which are listed as permitted sweeteners »
22
Review of labelling legislation What was done by EPA:
Development of substantiation (wrt glycerol & reference to alcohols) Sending:
November 2008DG Sanco (E4 & E3) French Presidency in the CouncilCouncil secretariat (for distribution to MS)EP Rapporteur ENVI COM: R. Sommer EP: ca 10 MEPs interested in food topics – EPA amendment tabled by MEP Doyle
February 2009Czech Presidency in the Council
July 2009Swedish Presidency in the Council: ELC meeting 1st October 09 New EP: Sommer confirmed Rapporteur – A. Doyle not MEP anymore
At national level?
23
Review of labelling legislationEP calendar – 1st reading
• Mid-October: Ms Sommer's draft report ready for translation: EPA amdt still in?• Early November: consideration draft report in ENVI Cte • Mid-November: deadline for amendments• End-January 2010: consideration amendments in ENVI Cte• 16 March 2010: Vote ENVI Cte• 19 April 2010: Plenary vote
• Shadowrapporteurs in ENVI Cte
– Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy (ALDE, NL)– Glenis Willmott (S&D, UK)– Stuan Stevenson (ECR, UK)