1
Proposed ENERGY STAR Specifications for Computer Monitors
Craig W. Hershberg
ENERGY STAR Office Equipment and Consumer Electronics
www.energystar.gov
2
Agenda
Computer monitor specification
• Objectives
• History
• Specification highlights
• Industry feedback
• Next steps
• Questions from EU - EPA agreement
• Your comments / questions
• Our questions for you
3
Agenda (cont’d)
• Do you need specifics ?
– Sleep, Off , On, Non-energy aspects
• Test method
• The time is right - LCDs
4
Agenda (cont’d)
Logistics and other issues
• How to collaborate when revising the specifications• Subsequent meetings• Summary of meeting, including action items and
schedule for follow-up• Preliminary plans for other Office Equipment
Products– procedure for collaboration
5
Objectives
• Provide understanding and disclosure of draft monitor specification
• Provide detailed answers to questions
• Receive constructive feedback from you
• Develop consensus on direction identified today
• Agree on next steps
6
The history:
• What monitor specs. exist in Europe now ?– GEEA– TCO
• Reviewed independent monitor research from DisplaySearch, IDC, Europeans, and others
• Met with monitor manufacturers at COMDEX, CES, DisplaySearch, and one-on-one (HANS-PAUL)
• Analyzed self-reported data from manufacturers in STAR database
• Independently measured monitor power use• Compared data with LBNL, ADL studies• Made recommendations to EPA. EPA weighed them with others
and created draft specification.
7
Revising the ENERGY STAR Computer Monitor Specification:
Highlights
8
Terminology
ON: “active”, “full power”
SLEEP: After x minutes of inactivity, monitor goes to lower power usage mode. “low power”
OFF: “Standby”
Remember: ON, SLEEP, AND OFF
9
Current ENERGY STAR Specification
• Sets minimum wattage levels in low-power or “sleep” mode.
– First Sleep Mode: 15 watts
– Second or “Deep Sleep” Mode 8 watts
10
Why Revise the Current Specification?
• Virtually all monitors meet current ENERGY STAR specification.
• Large percentage of monitors are not sleep enabled (i.e., we are not getting the energy savings we could be).
• Recent NRDC research shows energy use in “on” mode is 80 –90% of total kWh/yr.
• For “on” and “off” modes, wide range of performance between similar-sized models.
• Broad interest in limiting standby power use.
11
Goals for Revised Specification
• Incorporate all 3 operating modes:– On (active)– Sleep (inactive)– Off (standby)
• Performance-based specification.• One specification for all monitors, not one for
CRTs, one for LCDs, etc.• Equal or better performance compared to
non-ENERGY STAR labeled models.
12
The Core Requirements
• Maximum allowable power consumption levels for each mode: On, Sleep, Off
• Consensus test method for measuring active power usage.
• Minimum consumer acceptance criteria (brightness, warranty, etc.)
• Product and package labeling.
13
Why Active Power?
• Feasible without negatively affecting product performance; in fact, some manufacturers are already meeting the proposed specifications
• Limited additional energy savings potential in sleep and off modes; ; 90% of savings with proposed spec is from “active”
• Not dependent on enabling rates
• Allows a variety of technologies (e.g., CRT and LCD) to qualify
14
LCDs
• Highlight a new technology in the marketplace
• Additional benefits:– Space– Heat– Power consumption– Useful life– Installation– Disposal
15
On Mode: Active Power Use
• Sets maximum allowable active power (W)
Power as a function of mega pixels:
W = 30 + 20X
Example: monitor has resolution of:1280 x 1024 = 1,310,720 or 1.31 mega pixels
W = 30 + 20 (1.31) = 56 W
16
On Mode (cont.)
• Technology neutral, agnostic to monitor type (LCD or CRT), size (15”, 17”, etc.).
• If monitor yields more information, allow a little more power consumption.
17
Sleep Mode
• Just one sleep mode level.
• Maximum allowable power: 4 W
• If multiple sleep modes, all must meet 4W requirement.
18
Sleep Mode Advisory Language
• For consideration in updated ENERGY STAR computer specification:
Maximum default time: 15 minutes
Maximum recovery time: 5 seconds
• Goal – increase likelihood that users actually use and are not annoyed by energy management features.
19
Off Mode
• Synonymous with standby.
• Power consumed when device is plugged in, but switched off: 2 W.
• Working to harmonize with US Executive Order for Standby Power Consumption (1 watt executive order)
20
Non-energy Reqts.
• Must be: bright enough, easy-to-read, reliable.
• Brightness: minimum luminance of 100 nits (candelas/m2).
• Contrast: minimum contrast ratio of 200:1.• Defective Pixels: 5 sub-pixel faults per
million sub-pixels.• Warranty: at least 2 years. • User Interface: UI Standard recommended
21
Labeling Requirements
ENERGY STAR logo must be displayed on:
• top/front of product,
• product package,
• product literature.
22
Time Line for Revision of ComputerMonitor Specification
April2002
May2002
June2002
July2002
August2002
Sept.2002
Oct.2002
Nov.2002
Dec.2002
Jan.2003
EPA to distribute first draft of specification toindustry and other stakeholders
18
EPA to meet with industry in San Francisco todiscuss first draft of specification
29
EPA to work with Test Method DevelopmentCommittee to refine test method
20 24
EPA to work with interested manufacturers onnon-energy aspects of specification
20 15
EPA to work with ITI and interestedmanufacturers on product labeling ideas andother aspects of Partnership Agreement
20 15
Prior to EU meeting, EPA to update the draftspecification per feedback received to date
20-24
EPA to meet with EU representatives in Nice,France to present and discuss draft monitorspecification
27-31
EU to send comments to EPA and EPA toreview them
01 15
Industry to meter current models based onrefined test method
25 15
Final day for industry to submit test data toEPA
15
EPA to analyze data and prepare draft two ofthe specification
16 04
EPA to confer with TCO during thepreparation of draft two
16 04
EPA to distribute second draft of specificationto industry and other stakeholders
05
23
Industry and EU to send comments to EPAand EPA to review them
06 09
EPA to prepare final specification 10 29EPA to distribute final specification toindustry and other stakeholders
30
EPA to work with industry to identifypotential venues to announce/promote newspecification. Prepare announcement, etc.
01
Interested manufacturers sign PartnershipAgreement
01
Tentative effective date of specification 01
Time Line for Revision of ComputerMonitor Specification (cont’d.)
24
What did the monitor industry think about our draft
specification?
25
Key Industry Feedback Regarding Draft Specification
• Industry expressed few concerns on having the new specification include requirements for all three operating modes: on, sleep, and off.
• With few exceptions, industry agreed to a pixel per watt approach for on mode
• EPA and industry agreed to define a common test method for measuring on mode power consumption. Manufacturers to test and submit data once test method is finalized
26
Key Industry Feedback Regarding Draft Specification (cont’d)
• Should ENERGY STAR set one specification (one line) that covers all CRT and LCD monitors, or should the specification differentiate between CRTs and LCDs (2 lines) ?
• Specification too stringent for CRTs, particularly for the desktop publishing environment (e.g., large screen sizes)
• Wake-up time for monitor. Industry wants more guidance on how to measure/define wake-up time
27
Key Industry Feedback Regarding Draft Specification (cont’d)
• Industry supports a single sleep mode specification, as opposed to the current sleep and deep sleep design
• 4-watt sleep mode specification is agreeable
• off mode of 2 watts may be difficult for LCDs
28
Key Industry Feedback Regarding Draft Specification (cont’d)
• Several manufacturers questioned non-energy requirements
• Specific concerns include:– Brightness level will be harder to meet for larger
CRT monitors.– EPA should reference ISO standards for contrast
ratio; CRTs and LCDs are measured differently.– Pixel faults only applies to LCD monitors.– Warranties could be a serious challenge with
retailers, and may not work in international markets.
29
Next Steps...
30
Key Next Steps for EPA and Industry
• Establish test procedure
• Industry to submit input to EPA on non-energy parameters
• Manufacturers to test monitors according to new test procedure and submit data to EPA.
• EPA to analyze new data and revise specifications, as necessary.
31
Changes to specification based on Industry Response
• May need to allow more CRTs to qualify
• large screen CRTs issue
• Scale down non-energy attributes
• Monitor wake-up time ?
• Test procedure
32
Questions ?
Comments ?
33
• Were their questions or comments on the first draft?
– Test procedure, non-energy attributes, etc....
• Like to submit next draft to you first provided we receive comments in timely fashion (3 weeks)
• Can you provide data from European manufacturers?
Questions for You...
34
Sleep, Off, On Mode and non-energy attributes
The Specifics
35
Sleep Mode
Current ENERGY STAR Specification:
• First Sleep: 15 W; Second Sleep: 8W
Proposed Specification: • Just one level : 4 W; simplifies spec• Under the new spec, sleep mode power is
about 10% of active mode power• Roughly two-thirds of existing models can
meet the proposed sleep requirement.
36
Sleep Mode Questions
Verify consensus:
• Only 1 tier (no deep sleep)?
• Maximum power level : 4 W?
• Advisory levels set at right levels?-Default time till sleep: < 15 minutes
-Recovery time: < 5 seconds
37
Off Mode
• Current specification: no standby power limit.
• Current measured levels: some as high as 8-9 W, several at 4-5 W.
• Proposed specification: 2 W.
• Lots of models currently meet the 2W limit.
38
“Off” Mode Questions
• Verify Consensus:
– Is 2W the right level?
– Beneficial to have same level set in Executive Order (not simply 1W)?
– Suggestions on how to harmonize with European Union. (TCO)
39
On (Active) Mode Discussion
40
What Does The Term “Energy Efficient Monitor” Mean?
• Efficiency = Useful Output or Service Provided / Total Energy Input
• Useful output or service could be diagonal inches of screen size, square inches of screen size, or total pixels displayed
• Monitor not displaying information (providing useful output) in sleep or standby modes, so minimize power use at those times to achieve high overall efficiency
• Can account for all energy use in all three modes separately or with a duty cycle
• ENERGY STAR seeks to recognize top 25% efficiency
Estimated Annual Energy Use for CRTs and LCDs
42
The Advantages of Pixels/Watt
• Pixels/watt approach has a number of key advantages:• More technology neutral – avoids difference between
viewable screen size and total• Screen area (square inches) unknown to consumers• Credits CRTs for their present resolution advantage, yet
allows for very high resolution options like IBM’s new 9.1 million pixel LCD
• Emphasizes display quality over physical size• Avoids difficulty of trying to estimate a representative “duty
cycle” for all monitors• Simple, like lumens/watt (lighting) or CFM/watt (fans).
Can also be characterized as watts/megapixel
Effect of Resolution and Monitor Type on Active Power Consumption
Effect of Resolution and Monitor Type on Active Power Consumption for Monitors 17” and Less
Effect of Resolution and Monitor Type on Active Power Consumption for Monitors Greater than 17”
46
Effect of Resolution and Monitor Size on Active Power Consumption for LCD Monitors
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
0.00 250000.00 500000.00 750000.00 1000000.00 1250000.00 1500000.00 1750000.00 2000000.00 2250000.00 2500000.00 2750000.00 3000000.00
Millions of Pixels (horizontal X vertical resolution)
Wat
ts in
Act
ive
Mo
de
< 16"
16-17"
18-20"
> 20"
Proposed Specification
47
Effect of Resolution and Monitor Size on Active Power Consumption for CRT Monitors
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
0.00 250000.00 500000.00 750000.00 1000000.00 1250000.00 1500000.00 1750000.00 2000000.00 2250000.00 2500000.00 2750000.00 3000000.00
Millions of Pixels (horizontal X vertical resolution)
Wat
ts in
Act
ive
Mo
de
< 16"
16-17"
18-20"
> 20"
Proposed Specification
48
Applying Active Power Spec to Standard Resolutions
93 watts3,145,7282048 x 1536
82 watts2,592,0001800 x 1440
69 watts1,920,000UXGA1600 x 1200
57 watts1,310,720SXGA1280 x 1024
46 watts786,432XGA1024 x 768
40 watts480,000SVGA800 x 600
37 watts307,200VGA640 x 480
Maximum Power UseTotal PixelsCategoryResolution
49
Need for Consistent Measurement
• STAR database contains self-reported data from manufacturers
• Not all monitors measured under identical conditions in active or “on” mode
• Depending on user settings and image displayed, CRT power variations can be +/- 30%. LCD variations can be +/- 50%.
• ENERGY STAR has helped develop common test methods to the ventilation and lighting industries – may be able to bring standardization to monitor measurements as well.
500
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Resolution Refresh Rate Brightness Contrast # of Colors Image Displayed Extremes
Setting
Wat
ts
High
Low
Average
Effects of User Settings on Power for a 21” CRT Monitor
51
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Resolution Refresh Rate Brightness Contrast # of Colors Image Displayed Extremes
Setting
Wat
ts
High
Low
Average
Effects of User Settings on Power for a 17” LCD Monitor
52
Non-Energy Aspects of the Specification
53
Why Include Non-Energy Attributes?
• Goal is to ensure a level playing field – maintain or enhance quality while saving energy
• What aspects of product quality or performance could be compromised if a manufacturer looked for a “quick fix” to meet the new ENERGY STAR spec?
• ENERGY STAR and the utilities that support it want to ensure that customers will have a satisfying experience with labeled products.
• Reliability -- Saving energy is the product of power savings and time (kwh = w*h). An energy efficient product that fails early won’t save much energy.
54
55
Key Non-Energy Spec Provisions
• Brightness – Minimum of 100 nits at default brightness and contrast settings– LCDs typically 150 to 250 nits– CRTs typically 80 to 120 nits
• Contrast ratio – Minimum of 200:1 (can adjust settings to achieve this level)– LCDs typically 200:1 to 400:1– CRTs typically >400:1
• Without these specs, very dim or low contrast screens could more easily meet ENERGY STAR but may not satisfy users
56
Other Key Attributes
• Refresh rate – Minimum of 85 Hz for CRTs and 60 Hz for LCDs – attempt to preserve ergonomic quality
• Pixel faults – No more than 5 sub-pixel faults per million sub-pixels (Class II, ISO 13406-2) – seek to minimize quality differences between CRT & LCD
• Warranty – At least 2 years - 3 years common from many major manufacturers, but spec recognizes retailer preference for selling extended warranties
57
Other Possible Non-Energy Attributes
• Viewing angle – How far from the horizontal and vertical axes of the screen can it still be clearly seen?
• Wake from sleep time – How long before information is legible on screen after wakeup? Is there a consensus way to measure that?
• Pixel density – pixels per inch (PPI)• Resolution/Addressability Ratio (RAR) – VESA
Section 6.6 – ability of a screen to resolve individual lines or pixels
• Others?
58
Test Method Discussion
59
Elements of a Standard Test Procedure
• Identical on-screen image (alternating black and white lines 1 pixel in height?) filling full viewable area of screen
• Default brightness and contrast settings (balance between simplicity and risk of manipulation)
• Highest VESA supported resolution with a refresh rate of at least 85 Hz for CRTs, native resolution and 60 Hz refresh rate for LCDs – is other timing language needed?
60
Other Test Procedure Elements
• Reference VESA specifications for power measurement – true RMS power at 3 combinations of voltage and frequency, averaged across at least 5 test samples– 100 VAC, 50 Hz; 117 VAC, 60 Hz; 230 VAC, 50 Hz
• Leave off or disconnect any included peripheral features – TV tuner, microphone, speakers, USB hubs, etc.
• Others?
61
Standardized Labeling Information on the Box
48,000 pixels/watt1600 x 1200 pixels
2 watts4 watts40 watts
Energy EfficiencyResolution
Energy Efficiency measures how much information can be displayed per watt of power used.Higher numbers are better.
Off Power UseSleep Power UseActive Power Use
62
ENERGY STAR Office Equipment specification
revisions…
What does the future hold?
63
Future Specification Revisions
• Other Office Equipment• Laptops (initiate research March 2002)
• Scanners, printers, copiers, MFDs, fax machines
– (Scanner USB issue; initiate research Sept. 2002)
• computer (initiate research mid-2003)
• Vision
• EU-EPA collaboration
• sleep, active power and standby power
• energy efficient power supplies
• USB driven products
• universal imaging specification