![Page 1: 1 Research Perspectives on the Objects-Early Debate: A study of the March 2004 SIGCSE-members discussion list “storm”. Presenter: Raymond Lister University](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022083119/5a4d1aef7f8b9ab05997cff3/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
Research Perspectives on the Objects-Early Debate: A study of the March 2004 SIGCSE-members discussion list “storm”.
Presenter: Raymond ListerUniversity of Technology, Sydney &ITiCSE 2006 Working Group
Melbourne Conventicle, November 17, 2006.
![Page 2: 1 Research Perspectives on the Objects-Early Debate: A study of the March 2004 SIGCSE-members discussion list “storm”. Presenter: Raymond Lister University](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022083119/5a4d1aef7f8b9ab05997cff3/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
![Page 3: 1 Research Perspectives on the Objects-Early Debate: A study of the March 2004 SIGCSE-members discussion list “storm”. Presenter: Raymond Lister University](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022083119/5a4d1aef7f8b9ab05997cff3/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
99 postings from 39 people – nobody changed their mind.
Direct experience, introspection, and intuition can’t solve disagreement!
The religious ware.g. SIGCSE-members discussion list “storm”, 2004
![Page 4: 1 Research Perspectives on the Objects-Early Debate: A study of the March 2004 SIGCSE-members discussion list “storm”. Presenter: Raymond Lister University](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022083119/5a4d1aef7f8b9ab05997cff3/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
197 Nov 13 Michael K÷lling (4126) I Object 198 Nov 14 Jens Benned Benned (5477) Re: I Object 199 Nov 14 Dennis J Frailey (4869) Re: I Object 200 Nov 14 Tom Horton (6199) procedural co 201 Nov 14 Dennis J Frailey (4995) Re: I Object 202 Nov 14 Scot Drysdale (7143) Re: I Object 203 Nov 14 Timothy Stanley (3692) Re: I Object 204 Nov 14 Frank H. Young (5258) Re: I Object 205 Nov 14 Joseph Bergin (4276) Re: I Object 206 Nov 14 Rob Faux (4413) Re: I Object 207 Nov 14 Guzdial, Mark (7754) Re: I Object 208 Nov 14 Carl G. Alphonce (4853) Re: I Object 209 Nov 14 Rick Gee (5434) Re: I Object 210 Nov 14 Stefan Brandle (4094) Re: I Object 211 Nov 15 Rich Lamb (4440) Re: I Object 212 Nov 15 Dennis J Frailey (4945) Re: I Object 213 Nov 15 Byron Weber Becker (5605) Re: I Object 214 Nov 15 Guzdial, Mark (5011) Re: I Object 215 Nov 15 James Walden (7667) Re: I Object
![Page 5: 1 Research Perspectives on the Objects-Early Debate: A study of the March 2004 SIGCSE-members discussion list “storm”. Presenter: Raymond Lister University](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022083119/5a4d1aef7f8b9ab05997cff3/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Research vs. Teaching (reprised)
Guided by direct experience and introspection
Guided by “folk pedagogies”
Outcomes remain “private”
Read literature, attend seminars/conferences
Work within well defined theoretical or empirical framework
Peer-reviewed publication
We lead a double life
![Page 6: 1 Research Perspectives on the Objects-Early Debate: A study of the March 2004 SIGCSE-members discussion list “storm”. Presenter: Raymond Lister University](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022083119/5a4d1aef7f8b9ab05997cff3/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Boyer (1990)
The “Scholarship
of Teaching”
![Page 7: 1 Research Perspectives on the Objects-Early Debate: A study of the March 2004 SIGCSE-members discussion list “storm”. Presenter: Raymond Lister University](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022083119/5a4d1aef7f8b9ab05997cff3/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Furthermore …
Computing Education research is as much the study of the teachers as it is the study of students.
![Page 8: 1 Research Perspectives on the Objects-Early Debate: A study of the March 2004 SIGCSE-members discussion list “storm”. Presenter: Raymond Lister University](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022083119/5a4d1aef7f8b9ab05997cff3/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Misunderstandings of Education Research
From the March 2004 sigcse-members storm …
“Don’t educational experiments almost always succeed, especially if the evaluation is qualitative …”
“I have yet to meet … someone who has seriously … tried several alternative of the proposed OO introduction methods and is really in a position to make comparative … statements.”
![Page 9: 1 Research Perspectives on the Objects-Early Debate: A study of the March 2004 SIGCSE-members discussion list “storm”. Presenter: Raymond Lister University](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022083119/5a4d1aef7f8b9ab05997cff3/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Subgroups
Literature Phenomenography Rhetoric Biography
![Page 10: 1 Research Perspectives on the Objects-Early Debate: A study of the March 2004 SIGCSE-members discussion list “storm”. Presenter: Raymond Lister University](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022083119/5a4d1aef7f8b9ab05997cff3/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
The “Literature” SubgroupMembers: Jacqui, Kate, Brian
Claims investigated: 1. OO programming is easier/harder to learn than
imperative programming.2. Students who learn OO first do not learn
algorithmic problem solving.3. Students who learn OO imperative first find
learning OO programming difficult.4. Success in teaching depends on a match
between language and teaching paradigms. Evidence: See next slide …
![Page 11: 1 Research Perspectives on the Objects-Early Debate: A study of the March 2004 SIGCSE-members discussion list “storm”. Presenter: Raymond Lister University](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022083119/5a4d1aef7f8b9ab05997cff3/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
![Page 12: 1 Research Perspectives on the Objects-Early Debate: A study of the March 2004 SIGCSE-members discussion list “storm”. Presenter: Raymond Lister University](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022083119/5a4d1aef7f8b9ab05997cff3/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Directly related literature
Tew et al, 2005 Ramalingam and Wiedenbeck Willshire Ventura and Ramamurthy Decker Garner, Haden, and Robins Haaster and Hagan
… Plus “classic” papers from the 70s and 80s.
![Page 13: 1 Research Perspectives on the Objects-Early Debate: A study of the March 2004 SIGCSE-members discussion list “storm”. Presenter: Raymond Lister University](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022083119/5a4d1aef7f8b9ab05997cff3/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
The “Rhetoric” Subgroup
Members: Kathy, Tony, Andrew, Lew Question: In the absence of real data, how does
the computer science community debate this issue? How are individual positions justified?
(Aristotle & rhetoric: “ethos”, “pathos”, and “logos” )
e.g. The Yoda argumente.g. “paradigm” (c.f. Bob Dylan)OO advocates as having the “power”
![Page 14: 1 Research Perspectives on the Objects-Early Debate: A study of the March 2004 SIGCSE-members discussion list “storm”. Presenter: Raymond Lister University](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022083119/5a4d1aef7f8b9ab05997cff3/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
The “Phenomenography” Subgroup
Member: Anders Berglunde.g. …
OO as a new paradigm
vs.
OO as an extension of imperative
(“Ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny”?)
![Page 15: 1 Research Perspectives on the Objects-Early Debate: A study of the March 2004 SIGCSE-members discussion list “storm”. Presenter: Raymond Lister University](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022083119/5a4d1aef7f8b9ab05997cff3/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
The “Biography” Subgroup
Members: Carsten Schulte, with Joe Bergin
Question: What life experiences contributed to people adopting their position?
Two biographies: Pro: Jo Bergin: a prior commitment to OO?Con: Stuart Reges: learnt OO in order to teach it.
![Page 16: 1 Research Perspectives on the Objects-Early Debate: A study of the March 2004 SIGCSE-members discussion list “storm”. Presenter: Raymond Lister University](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022083119/5a4d1aef7f8b9ab05997cff3/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
99 postings from 39 people – nobody changed their mind.
Direct experience, introspection, and intuition can’t solve disagreement!
Summary and Conclusion