Transcript

Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis

Air Quality 

 

APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐1 

October 2014ICF 00323.08

 

3.3 Air Quality Thissectiondescribestheregulatoryandenvironmentalsettingforairquality.Italsodescribesimpactsonairqualitythatwouldresultfromimplementationoftheprogramandthetwoindividualprojectsanddescribesmitigationforsignificantimpactswherefeasibleandappropriate.Mitigationmeasuresareprescribedwherefeasibleandappropriate.

GreenhousegasemissionsareconsideredseparatelyfromtheairqualityanalysisinthisPEIRinChapter3.7.

3.3.1 Existing Conditions 

TheprogramareaiswithintheSanFranciscoBayAreaAirBasin(SFBAAB),whichencompassesanine‐countyregionconsistingofallofAlameda,ContraCosta,SantaClara,SanFrancisco,SanMateo,Marin,andNapaCountiesandthesouthernportionsofSolanoandSonomaCounties.BecausetruckstransportingsomecomponentsandaggregatewouldtravelfromthePortofStocktonandthecityofTracythroughportionsoftheSanJoaquinValleyAirBasin(SJVAB)totheprogramarea,thestudyareaalsoincludestheSJVAB.

Regulatory Setting 

TheairqualitymanagementagenciesofdirectimportanceinAlamedaCountyareEPA,theCaliforniaAirResourcesBoard(ARB),andtheBayAreaAirQualityManagementDistrict(BAAQMD).EPAhasestablishedfederalairqualitystandardsforwhichARBandBAAQMDhaveprimaryimplementationresponsibility.ARBandBAAQMDarealsoresponsibleforensuringthatstateairqualitystandardsaremet.TheSanJoaquinValleyAirPollutionControlDistrict(SJVAPCD)hasjurisdictionovertheSJVAB.

Federal 

Clean Air Act and National Ambient Air Quality Standards 

ThefederalCleanAirAct(CAA),promulgatedin1963andamendedseveraltimesthereafter,includingthe1990CleanAirActamendments(CAAA),establishestheframeworkformodernairpollutioncontrol.TheActdirectsEPAtoestablishNationalAmbientAirQualityStandards(NAAQS)forthesixcriteriapollutants(discussedinSection3.3.2,EnvironmentalSetting).TheNAAQSaredividedintoprimaryandsecondarystandards;theformeraresettoprotecthumanhealthwithinanadequatemarginofsafety,andthelattertoprotectenvironmentalvalues,suchasplantandanimallife.Table3.3‐1summarizestheNAAQSandtheCaliforniaAmbientAirQualityStandards(CAAQS).

TheCAArequiresstatestosubmitastateimplementationplan(SIP)forareasinnonattainmentforfederalstandards.TheSIP,whichisreviewedandapprovedbyEPA,mustdemonstratehowthefederalstandardswouldbeachieved.Failingtosubmitaplanorsecureapprovalcanleadtodenialoffederalfundingandpermits.IncaseswheretheSIPfailstodemonstrateachievementofthestandards,EPAisdirectedtoprepareafederalimplementationplan.

Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis

Air Quality 

 

APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐2 

October 2014ICF 00323.08

 

Table 3.3‐1. National and State Ambient Air Quality Standards  

CriteriaPollutant AverageTimeCaliforniaStandards

NationalStandardsa

Primary Secondary

Ozone 1‐hour 0.09ppm Noneb Noneb

8–hour 0.070ppm 0.075ppm 0.075ppm

Particulatematter(PM10) 24‐hour 50g/m3 150g/m3 150g/m3

Annualmean 20g/m3 None None

Fineparticulatematter(PM2.5) 24‐hour None 35g/m3 35g/m3

Annualmean 12g/m3 12.0g/m3 15g/m3

Carbonmonoxide 8‐hour 9.0ppm 9ppm None

1‐hour 20ppm 35ppm None

Nitrogendioxide Annualmean 0.030ppm 0.053ppm 0.053ppm

1‐hour 0.18ppm 0.100ppm None

Sulfurdioxidec Annualmean None 0.030ppm None

24‐hour 0.04ppm 0.14ppm None

3‐hour None None 0.5ppm

1‐hour 0.25ppm 0.075ppm None

Lead 30‐dayAverage 1.5g/m3 None None

Calendarquarter None 1.5g/m3 1.5g/m3

3‐monthaverage None 0.15g/m3 0.15g/m3

Sulfates 24‐hour 25g/m3 None None

Visibility‐reducingparticles 8‐hour –d None None

Hydrogensulfide 1‐hour 0.03ppm None None

Vinylchloride 24‐hour 0.01ppm None None

Source:CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard2013a.ppm = partspermillion.g/m3 = microgramspercubicmeter.a Nationalstandardsaredividedintoprimaryandsecondarystandards.Primarystandardsareintendedtoprotectpublichealth,whereassecondarystandardsareintendedtoprotectpublicwelfareandtheenvironment.

b Thefederal1‐hourstandardof12partsperhundredmillionwasineffectfrom1979throughJune15,2005.Therevokedstandardisreferencedbecauseitwasemployedforsuchalongperiodandabenchmarkforstateimplementationplans.

c Theannualand24‐hourNAAQSforSO2applyonlyforoneyearafterdesignationofthenew1‐hourstandardtothoseareasthatwerepreviouslynonattainmentareasforthe24‐hourandannualNAAQS.

d TheCAAQSforvisibility‐reducingparticlesisdefinedbyanextinctioncoefficientof0.23perkilometer(visibilityof10milesormoreduetoparticleswhenrelativehumidityislessthan70%).

Clean Air Nonroad Diesel Rule 

Toreduceemissionsfromoffroaddieselequipment,EPAestablishedaseriesofincreasinglystrictemissionstandardsfornewengines.Locomotivesandmarinevesselsareexemptfromthisrule.Manufacturersofoffroaddieselenginesarerequiredtoproduceenginesmeetingcertainemission

Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis

Air Quality 

 

APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐3 

October 2014ICF 00323.08

 

standardsbasedonthemodelyeartheenginewasmanufacturedbasedonthefollowingcomplianceschedule.

Tier1standardswerephasedinfrom1996to2000(yearofmanufacture),dependingontheenginehorsepowercategory.

Tier2standardswerephasedinfrom2001to2006.

Tier3standardswerephasedinfrom2006to2008.

Tier4standards,whichrequireadd‐onemissions‐controlequipmenttoattainthem,arecurrentlybeingphasedin,from2008to2015.

State 

California Clean Air Act and California Ambient Air Quality Standards 

In1988,thestatelegislatureadoptedtheCaliforniaCleanAirAct(CCAA),whichestablishedastatewideairpollutioncontrolprogram.UnlikethefederalCAA,theCCAAdoesnotsetpreciseattainmentdeadlines.Instead,theCCAArequiresallairdistrictsinthestatetoendeavortomeettheCAAQSbytheearliestpracticaldate.Eachairdistrict’scleanairplanisspecificallydesignedtoattainthestandardsandmustbedesignedtoachieveanannual5%reductionindistrict‐wideemissionsofeachnonattainmentpollutantoritsprecursors.Whenanairdistrictisunabletoachievea5%annualreductionindistrict‐wideemissionsofeachnonattainmentpollutantoritsprecursors,theadoptionof“allfeasiblemeasures”onanexpeditiousscheduleisacceptableasanalternativestrategy(HealthandSafetyCodeSection40914(b)(2)).CAAQSaregenerallymorestringentthantheNAAQSandincorporateadditionalstandardsforSO4,H2S,C2H3Cl,andvisibility‐reducingparticles.TheCAAQSandNAAQSarelistedtogetherinTable3.3‐1.

ARBandlocalairdistrictsbearresponsibilityforachievingtheCAAQSs,whicharetobeachievedthroughdistrict‐levelairqualitymanagementplansthatwouldbeincorporatedintotheSIP.InCalifornia,EPAhasdelegatedauthoritytoprepareSIPstoARB,which,inturn,hasdelegatedthatauthoritytoindividualairdistricts.ARBtraditionallyhasestablishedstateairqualitystandards,maintainingoversightauthorityinairqualityplanning,developingprogramsforreducingemissionsfrommotorvehicles,developingairemissioninventories,collectingairqualityandmeteorologicaldata,andapprovingSIPs.

TheCCAAsubstantiallyaddstotheauthorityandresponsibilitiesofairdistricts.TheCCAAdesignatesairdistrictsasleadairqualityplanningagencies,requiresairdistrictstoprepareairqualityplans,andgrantsairdistrictsauthoritytoimplementtransportationcontrolmeasures.TheCCAAalsoemphasizesthecontrolof“indirectandarea‐widesources”ofairpollutantemissions.TheCCAAgiveslocalairpollutioncontroldistrictsexplicitauthoritytoregulateindirectsourcesofairpollutionandtoestablishtrafficcontrolmeasures(TCMs).

Statewide Truck and Bus Regulation 

Originallyadoptedin2005,theonroadtruckandbusregulationrequiresheavytruckstoberetrofittedwithparticulatematter(PM)filters.Theregulationappliestoprivatelyandfederallyowneddieselfueledtruckswithagrossvehicleweightrating(GWR)greaterthan14,000pounds.Compliancewiththeregulationcanbereachedthroughoneoftwopaths:(1)vehicleretrofitsaccordingtoengineyear,or(2)phase‐inschedule.CompliancepathsensurethatbyJanuary2023,nearlyalltrucksandbuseswillhave2010modelyearenginesornewer.

Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis

Air Quality 

 

APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐4 

October 2014ICF 00323.08

 

State Tailpipe Emission Standards 

Toreduceemissionsfromoffroaddieselequipment,onroaddieseltrucks,andharborcraft,ARBestablishedaseriesofincreasinglystrictemissionstandardsfornewengines.Newconstructionequipmentusedfortheprogram,includingheavydutytrucksandoffroadconstructionequipment,willberequiredtocomplywiththestandards.

Toxic Air Containment Regulation  

Californiaregulatestoxicaircontainments(TACs)primarilythroughtheTannerAirToxicsAct(AssemblyBill[AB]1807)andtheAirToxicsHotSpotsInformationandAssessmentActof1987(AB2588).Intheearly1980s,ARBestablishedastatewidecomprehensiveairtoxicsprogramtoreduceexposuretoairtoxics.TheToxicAirContaminantIdentificationandControlAct(AB1807)createdCalifornia’sprogramtoreduceexposuretoairtoxics.TheAirToxics“HotSpots”InformationandAssessmentAct(AB2588)supplementstheAB1807programbyrequiringastatewideairtoxicsinventory,notificationofpeopleexposedtoasignificanthealthrisk,andfacilityplanstoreducetheserisks.

InAugust1998,ARBidentifieddieselparticulatematter(DPM)emissionsfromdiesel‐fueledenginesasaTAC.InSeptember2000,ARBapprovedacomprehensivedieselriskreductionplantoreduceemissionsfrombothnewandexistingdiesel‐fueledenginesandvehicles(CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard2000).ThegoaloftheplanistoreducedieselPM10(respirableparticulatematter)emissionsandtheassociatedhealthriskby75%in2010andby85%by2020.Theplanidentifies14measuresthattargetnewandexistingonroadvehicles(e.g.,heavy‐dutytrucksandbuses),offroadequipment(e.g.,graders,tractors,forklifts,sweepers,andboats),portableequipment(e.g.,pumps),andstationaryengines(e.g.,stand‐bypowergenerators).ARBwillimplementtheplanoverthenextseveralyears.BecausetheARBmeasuresareenactedpriortoconstruction,theprogramwouldberequiredtocomplywithapplicabledieselcontrolmeasures.

TheTannerActsetsforthaformalprocedureforARBtodesignatesubstancesasTACs.Theprocedureentailsresearch,publicparticipation,andscientificpeerreviewbeforeARBdesignatesasubstanceasaTAC.Todate,ARBhasidentified21TACsandhasalsoadoptedEPA’slistofhazardousairpollutants(HAPs)asTACs.InAugust1998,DPMwasaddedtotheARBlistofTACs(CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard1998).

TheHotSpotsActrequiresthatexistingfacilitiesthatemittoxicsubstancesabovespecifiedlevelscompletethefollowingsteps.

Prepareatoxicemissioninventory.

Prepareariskassessmentifemissionsaresignificant(i.e.,10tonsperyearorifthetoxicsubstanceisonDistrict’sHealthRiskAssessment[HRA]list).

Notifythepublicofsignificantrisklevels.

Prepareandimplementriskreductionmeasures.

ARBhasadoptedseveralregulationsthatwillreducedieselemissionsfromin‐usevehiclesandenginesthroughoutCalifornia.Forexample,ARBadoptedanidlingregulationforonroaddiesel‐fueledcommercialvehiclesinJuly2004andupdateditinOctober2005.TheregulationappliestopublicandprivatelyownedtruckswithaGWRgreaterthan10,000pounds.Vehiclessubjecttotheregulationareprohibitedfromidlingformorethan5minutesinanyonelocation.ARBalsoadopted

Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis

Air Quality 

 

APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐5 

October 2014ICF 00323.08

 

aregulationfordiesel‐poweredconstructionandminingvehiclesoperating.Fleetownersaresubjecttoretrofitoracceleratedreplacement/repowerrequirementsforwhichARBmustobtainauthorizationfromEPApriortoenforcement.Theregulationalsoimposesa5‐minuteidlinglimitationonowners,operators,andrentersorlesseesofoffroaddieselvehicles.Insomecases,theparticulatematterreductionstrategiesalsoreducesmog‐formingemissionssuchasNOX.Asanongoingprocess,ARBreviewsaircontaminantsandidentifiesthosethatareclassifiedasTACs.ARBalsocontinuestoestablishnewprogramsandregulationsforthecontrolofTACs,includingDPMs,asappropriate.

Local 

Bay Area Air Quality Management District  

BAAQMDhaslocalairqualityjurisdictionoverprojectsinAlamedaCounty.BAAQMD’sresponsibilitiesincludeoverseeingstationary‐sourceemissions,approvingpermits,maintainingemissionsinventories,maintainingairqualitystations,overseeingagriculturalburningpermits,andreviewingairquality–relatedsectionsofenvironmentaldocumentsrequiredbyCEQA.BAAQMDisalsoresponsibleforestablishingandenforcinglocalairqualityrulesandregulationsthataddresstherequirementsoffederalandstateairqualitylawsandensuringthattheNAAQSandCAAQSaremet.

TheBAAQMDrulesoutlinedbelowmayapplytotheprogram.AdditionalBAAQMDrulesmayapplyasproject‐specificcomponentsareidentified.

Regulation2,Rule2(NewSourceReview).ThisregulationcontainsrequirementsforBestAvailableControlTechnologyandemissionoffsets.

Regulation2,Rule5(NewSourceReviewofToxicAirContaminants).ThisregulationoutlinesguidanceforevaluatingTACemissionsandtheirpotentialhealthrisks.

Regulation6,Rule1(ParticulateMatter).ThisregulationrestrictsemissionsofPMdarkerthanNo.1ontheRinglemannCharttolessthan3minutesinany1hour.

Regulation7(OdorousSubstances).Thisregulationestablishesgeneralodorlimitationsonodoroussubstancesandspecificemissionlimitationsoncertainodorouscompounds.

Regulation9,Rule8(StationaryInternalCombustionEngines).ThisregulationlimitsemissionsofNOXandCOfromstationaryinternalcombustionenginesofmorethan50horsepower.

TheBayAreaAirQualityManagementDistrictCaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityActAirQualityGuidelines(BAAQMDGuidelines)provideproceduresforassessingairqualityimpactsandpreparingtheairqualitysectionsofenvironmentaldocumentsunderCEQA.Theguidelinesidentifymethodologiesforpredictingprojectemissionsandimpactsandpresentmeasuresthatcanbeusedtoavoidorreduceairqualityimpacts.AlsooutlinedintheBAAQMDGuidelinesareadvisoryemissionsthresholdsthatthedistricthasadoptedtohelpCEQAleadagenciesdeterminewhetherconstructionandoperationalactivitiesassociatedwithprojectswouldhavesignificantadverseenvironmentalimpacts(BayAreaAirQualityManagementDistrict2011).

InAugust2013,theFirstDistrictCourtofAppealsreversedalowersuperiorcourtrulingthattheBAAQMDneededtocomplywithCEQApriortoadoptingits2010AirQualityGuidelinesandsignificancethresholds,therebyissuingawritofmandateorderingBAAQMDtosetasidethe

Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis

Air Quality 

 

APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐6 

October 2014ICF 00323.08

 

thresholdsandceasetheirdisseminationuntilBAAQMDcompliedwithCEQA.However,theAppellatecourtruledthatadoptionoftheguidelinesandthresholdsisnotconsideredaprojectsubjecttoCEQAreview,andadoptionofthesignificancethresholdswasnotarbitraryandcapricious.AsofNovember2013,theBAAQMDhasyettoformallyre‐recommenditsAirQualityGuidelinesandsignificancethresholdsforusebylocalagencies,buttheyarenowauthorizedtodosobytheAppellatecourt.

OtherairqualityplansBAAQMDhasadoptedincludetheBayArea2001OzoneAttainmentPlan(OzonePlan),aimedatreducingozoneandachievingtheNAAQSozonestandard.TheARBpreparedaRedesignationRequest,AttainmentDemonstration,andMaintenancePlanforcarbonmonoxide(CO)in1996thatincludesstrategiestoensurecontinuingattainmentoftheNAAQSforCO;thisplanwassubsequentlyrevisedin1998and2004.In2010,thedistrictalsoadoptedthe2010CleanAirPlan,whichupdatestheOzonePlanandprovidesanintegrated,multi‐pollutantstrategytoimproveairquality,protectpublichealth,andprotecttheclimate.

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District 

SJVAPCDistheregionalairqualityagencywithjurisdictionovertheSJVAB.AlthoughtheprogramareaislocatedwithinBAAQMD’sjurisdiction,itisassumedthattruckstransportingsomecomponentsandaggregatewouldtravelfromthePortofStocktonandthecityofTracythroughportionsoftheSJVABtotheprogramarea.BecausetheprogramareaislocatedintheSFBAAB,theSJVAPCDrulesandcleanairplanswouldnotbeapplicabletotheprogram.However,inordertodiscloseairqualityimpactswithintheSJVAB,thisanalysisincludesdiscussionofpotentialimpactsassociatedwithheavy‐dutytruckemissionsthatwouldbegeneratedwithintheSJVAB.Inaddition,becausetheSJVABisdownwindoftheprojectsitesomeemissionsthatareemittedattheprojectsitewithintheSFBAABwouldlikelydriftintotheSJVABthroughaprocessknownastransport.TheARBhasidentifiedtheSFBAABasatransportcontributortotheSJVAB(CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard2009).FordetailedstudiesofpollutanttransportwithinCalifornia,pleaserefertohttp://www.arb.ca.gov/aqd/transport/transport.htm.However,itisextremelydifficultandwouldbespeculativetodeterminethequantityofemissionsthatwilltraverseairbasinboundariesduetothehighvariabilityinwindpatternsandlocalweather.Therefore,theseemissionswerenotestimated.ProjectemissionsthatwouldbegeneratedintheSJVABareassessedusingsignificancethresholdsidentifiedinSJVAPCD’sGuideforAssessingandMitigatingAirQualityImpacts(SanJoaquinValleyAirPollutionControlDistrict2002).

Alameda County General Plan—East County Area Plan 

TheECAP,apartoftheAlamedaCountyGeneralPlan,containsairqualitygoalsandpoliciestoaddressairpollutionconcernsintheeasternareaofthecounty.TheECAPairqualitygoalisto“ensurethatairpollutionlevelsdonotthreatenpublichealthandsafety,economicdevelopment,orfuturegrowth”(AlamedaCounty2000:70).TheECAPwaslastrevisedin2000bythevoterinitiativeMeasureD;however,itdidnotresultinanychangestopoliciesregardingairquality.ECAPpoliciesapplicabletotheprogramincludethoselistedbelow(AlamedaCounty2000:70–71).

Policy296:TheCountyshallreviewthecumulativeimpactofproposedprojectsfortheirpotentialeffectonairqualityconditions.

Policy297:TheCountyshallcoordinateairqualityplanningeffortswithotherlocal,regionalandstateagencies.

Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis

Air Quality 

 

APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐7 

October 2014ICF 00323.08

 

Policy300:TheCountyshallreviewproposedprojectsfortheirpotentialtogeneratehazardousairpollutants.

Policy302:TheCountyshallincludebufferzoneswithinnewresidentialandsensitivereceptorsiteplanstoseparatethoseusesfromfreeways,arterials,pointsourcesandhazardousmateriallocations.

Policy303:TheCountyshallincorporatetheprovisionsoftheAssociationofBayAreaGovernment's(ABAG)BayAreaAirQualityPlanandtheBayAreaAirQualityManagementDistrict's(BAAQMD)AirQualityandUrbanDevelopmentGuidelinesintoprojectreviewprocedures.

Policy304:TheCountyshallnotifycitiesandtheBayAreaAirQualityManagementDistrict(BAAQMD)ofproposedprojectswhichmaysignificantlyaffectairquality.

Environmental Setting 

Regional Topography, Meteorology, and Climate 

Thetopographyoftheprogramareaisdominatedbynorthwest‐southeast‐trendingridgelinesthatreachanelevationofapproximately800to1,400feetabovemeansealevel(msl).Theelevationsofinterveningvalleybottomsintheprogramareaarefromapproximately400to800feetabovemsl.TheclimateoftheSFBAABisdeterminedlargelybyahigh‐pressuresystemthatisalmostalwayspresentovertheeasternPacificOceanoffthewestcoastofNorthAmerica.Highpressuresystemsarecharacterizedbyanupperlayerofdryairthatwarmsasitdescends,whichrestrictsthemobilityofcoolermarine‐influencedairnearthegroundsurfaceandresultsintheformationofsubsidenceinversions.Duringthewinter,thePacifichigh‐pressuresystemshiftssouthward,therebyallowingstormstopassthroughtheregion.Duringsummerandfall,emissionsgeneratedwithintheSFBAABcancombinewithabundantsunshineundertherestraininginfluencesoftopographyandsubsidenceinversionstocreateconditionsthatareconducivetotheformationofphotochemicalpollutants,suchasozone.

Theprogramareaisgenerallywell‐ventilatedbywinds.Winterprevailingwinddirectionsspanthenorth‐northeastthrougheast‐northeastsectors,causedbydrainageoffofthehillsandflowoutoftheAltamontPass.Duringthesummermonths,coldwaterupwellingalongthecoastandhotinlandtemperaturescancauseastrongonshorepressuregradientthattranslatesintoastrong,afternoonwind.BAAQMDoperatesaregionalairqualitymonitoringnetwork;thecloseststationtotheprogramareaistheLivermoreMonitoringStationonRinconAvenueintheCityofLivermore,whichisapproximately9milestothesouth‐southwest.InLivermore,over70%ofthewindisfromthesouth‐southwesttowest‐southwest,andbytheafternoon,35%ofthewindspeedisabout11milesperhour(mph).However,theprogramareatendstobeareceptorofozoneandozoneprecursorsfromSanFrancisco,Alameda,westernandnorthernContraCostaCounty,andSantaClaraCountyand,duringthesummermonths,temperaturestendtobewarm,whichpromotestheformationofozone(BayAreaAirQualityManagementDistrict2010).Inturn,theSJVABandtheCentralValleyingeneralthatisdownwindoftheprogramareaalsoisareceptorofthesesamepollutants,accumulat‐ingwithemissionsfromtheTri‐ValleyareaandtosomedegreenorthernContraCostaCountyandsouthernSolanoCounty.TheARBhasidentifiedtheSFBAABasatransportcontributortotheSacramentoregion,theMountainCountiesAirBasin,theNorthCentralCoastAirBasin,theNorthCoastAirBasin,theSanJoaquinValleyAirBasin,andtheSouthCentralCoastAirBasin(CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard2010).

Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis

Air Quality 

 

APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐8 

October 2014ICF 00323.08

 

TemperatureandprecipitationdatacollectedinLivermoreindicatethattheprogramareatypicallyhasaveragemaximumandminimumwinter(i.e.,January)temperaturesof57and37degreesFahrenheit(°F),respectively,whileaveragesummer(i.e.,July)maximumandminimumtemperaturesare89and54°F,respectively.Precipitationintheprogramareaaveragesapproximately14inchesperyear(WesternRegionalClimateCenter2013).

Air Pollutants of Concern 

ThefederalgovernmenthasestablishedNAAQS,andthestatehasestablishedCAAQS,respectively,forsixcriteriapollutants:ozone,CO,lead(Pb),nitrogendioxide(NO2),sulfurdioxide(SO2),andPM.

OzoneandNO2areconsideredregionalpollutantsbecausethey(ortheirprecursors)affectairqualityonaregionalscale;NO2reactsphotochemicallywithreactiveorganicgases(ROGs)toformozone,andthisreactionoccursatsomedistancedownwindofthesourceofpollutants.PollutantssuchasCO,SO2,andPbareconsideredtobelocalpollutantsthattendtoaccumulateintheairlocally.PMisconsideredtobealocalaswellasaregionalpollutant.

Theprimarypollutantsofconcerninthestudyareaareozone(includingnitrogenoxides[NOX]),CO,andPM.Principalcharacteristicssurroundingthesepollutantsarediscussedbelow.TACsarealsodiscussed,althoughnoairqualitystandardsexistforthesepollutants.

Ozone 

Ozoneisarespiratoryirritantthatcancausesevereear,nose,andthroatirritationandincreasesusceptibilitytorespiratoryinfections.Itisalsoanoxidantthatcancauseextensivedamagetoplantsthroughleafdiscolorationandcelldamage.Itcancausesubstantialdamagetoothermaterialsaswell,suchassyntheticrubberandtextiles.

Ozoneisnotemitteddirectlyintotheairbutisformedbyaphotochemicalreactionintheatmosphere.Ozoneprecursors—ROGandNOX—reactintheatmosphereinthepresenceofsunlighttoformozone.Becausephotochemicalreactionratesdependontheintensityofultravioletlightandairtemperature,ozoneisprimarilyasummerairpollutionproblem.Theozoneprecursors,ROGandNOX,aremainlyemittedbymobilesourcesandbystationarycombustionequipment.

Hydrocarbonsareorganicgasesthataremadeupofhydrogenandcarbonatoms.Thereareseveralsubsetsoforganicgases,includingROGsandvolatileorganiccompounds(VOCs).ROGsaredefinedbystaterulesandregulations;VOCsaredefinedbyfederalrulesandregulations.Forthepurposesofthisassessment,hydrocarbonsareclassifiedandreferredtoasROGs.BothROGsandVOCsareemittedfromtheincompletecombustionofhydrocarbonsorothercarbon‐basedfuelsorasaproductofchemicalprocesses.Themajorsourcesofhydrocarbonsarecombustionengineexhaust,oilrefineries,andoil‐fueledpowerplants;othercommonsourcesarepetroleumfuels,solvents,dry‐cleaningsolutions,andpaint(throughevaporation).

Thehealtheffectsofhydrocarbonsresultfromtheformationofozone.Highlevelsofhydrocarbonsintheatmospherecaninterferewithoxygenintakebyreducingtheamountofavailableoxygenthoughdisplacement.CarcinogenicformsofhydrocarbonsareconsideredTACs.TherearenoseparatehealthstandardsforROGs,althoughsomearealsotoxic;forexample,benzeneisbothaROGandacarcinogen.

Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis

Air Quality 

 

APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐9 

October 2014ICF 00323.08

 

Nitrogen Oxides 

Nitrogenoxidesareafamilyofhighlyreactivegasesthatareaprimaryprecursortotheformationofground‐levelozoneandreactintheatmospheretoformacidrain.Nitrogendioxide,oftenusedinterchangeablywithNOX,isabrownish,highlyreactivegasthatispresentinallurbanenvironments.ThemajorhumansourcesofNO2arecombustiondevices,suchasboilers,gasturbines,andmobileandstationaryreciprocatinginternalcombustionengines.Combustiondevicesemitprimarilynitricoxide(NO),whichreactsthroughoxidationintheatmospheretoformNO2(U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency2013a).ThecombinedemissionsofNOandNO2arereferredtoasNOXandreportedasequivalentNO2.BecauseNO2isformedanddepletedbyreactionsassociatedwithozone,theNO2concentrationinaparticulargeographicalareamaynotberepresentativeoflocalNOXemissionsources.

InhalationisthemostcommonrouteofexposuretoNO2.BecauseNO2hasrelativelylowsolubilityinwater,theprincipalsiteoftoxicityisinthelowerrespiratorytract.Theseverityoftheadversehealtheffectsprimarilydependsontheconcentrationinhaledratherthanthedurationofexposure.Anindividualmayexperienceavarietyofacutesymptoms,suchascoughing,difficultybreathing,vomiting,headache,andeyeirritationduringorshortlyafterexposure.Afteraperiodofapproximately4to12hours,anexposedindividualmayexperiencechemicalpneumonitisorpulmonaryedemawithbreathingabnormalities,cough,cyanosis,chestpain,andrapidheartbeat.SeveresymptomaticNO2intoxicationafteracuteexposurehasbeenlinkedtoprolongedrespiratoryimpairment,withsuchsymptomsasemphysema,bronchitis,andaggravatingexistingheatdisease(U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency2013b).

Carbon Monoxide 

CarbonMonoxide(CO),acolorlessandodorlessgas,interfereswiththetransferofoxygentothebrain.Itcancausedizzinessandfatigueandcanimpaircentralnervoussystemfunctions.COisemittedalmostexclusivelyfromtheincompletecombustionoffossilfuels.Inurbanareas,motorvehicles,powerplants,refineries,industrialboilers,ships,aircraft,andtrainsemitCO.AutomobileexhaustreleasesmostoftheCOinurbanareas.COisanonreactiveairpollutantthatdissipatesrelativelyquickly,soambientCOconcentrationsgenerallyfollowthespatialandtemporaldistributionsofvehiculartraffic.COconcentrationsareinfluencedbylocalmeteorologicalconditions—primarilywindspeed,topography,andatmosphericstability.COfrommotorvehicleexhaustcanbecomelocallyconcentratedwhensurface‐basedtemperatureinversionsarecombinedwithcalmatmosphericconditions,atypicalsituationatduskinurbanareasbetweenNovemberandFebruary.BecausemotorvehiclesarethedominantsourceofCOemissions,COhotspotsarenormallylocatednearroadsandfreewayswithhightrafficvolume.

Particulate Matter 

Particulatematterpollutionconsistsofverysmallliquidandsolidparticlesfloatingintheair,whichcanincludesmoke,soot,dust,salts,acids,andmetals.PMalsoformswhengasesemittedfromindustriesandmotorvehiclesundergochemicalreactionsintheatmosphere.Particulatematterlessthan10micronsindiameter,about1/7thethicknessofahumanhair,isreferredtoasPM10.Particulatematterthatis2.5micronsorlessindiameter,roughly1/28thediameterofahumanhair,isreferredtoasPM2.5.MajorsourcesofPM10includemotorvehicles;woodburningstovesandfireplaces;dustfromconstruction,landfills,andagriculture;wildfiresandbrush/wasteburning;industrialsources;windblowndustfromopenlands;andatmosphericchemicalandphotochemicalreactions.PM2.5resultsfromfuelcombustion(frommotorvehicles,powergeneration,and

Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis

Air Quality 

 

APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐10 

October 2014ICF 00323.08

 

industrialfacilities),residentialfireplaces,andwoodstoves.Inaddition,PM10andPM2.5canbeformedintheatmospherefromgasessuchasSO2,NOX,andVOCs.

PM10andPM2.5poseagreaterhealthriskthanlarger‐sizeparticles.Wheninhaled,thesetinyparticlescanpenetratethehumanrespiratorysystem’snaturaldefensesanddamagetherespiratorytract.PM10andPM2.5canincreasethenumberandseverityofasthmaattacks,causeoraggravatebronchitisandotherlungdiseases,andreducethebody’sabilitytofightinfections.Verysmallparticlesofsubstances,suchaslead,sulfates,andnitrates,cancauselungdamagedirectly.Thesesubstancescanbeabsorbedintothebloodstreamandcausedamageelsewhereinthebody;theycanalsotransportabsorbedgasessuchaschloridesorammoniumintothelungsandcauseinjury.Whereasparticles2.5to10micronsindiametertendtocollectintheupperportionoftherespiratorysystem,particles2.5micronsorlessaresotinythattheycanpenetratedeeperintothelungsanddamagelungtissues.Suspendedparticulatesalsodamageanddiscolorsurfacesonwhichtheysettle,andcontributetohazeandreduceregionalvisibility.

Toxic Air Contaminants 

AlthoughNAAQSandCAAQSexistforcriteriapollutants,noambientstandardsexistforTACs.ManypollutantsareidentifiedasTACsbecauseoftheirpotentialtoincreasetheriskofdevelopingcancerorotheracute(short‐term)orchronic(long‐term)healthproblems.ForTACsthatareknownorsuspectedcarcinogens,ARBhasconsistentlyfoundthattherearenolevelsorthresholdsbelowwhichexposureisriskfree.IndividualTACsvarygreatlyintheriskstheypresent;atagivenlevelofexposure,oneTACmayposeahazardthatismanytimesgreaterthananother.ForcertainTACs,aunitriskfactorcanbedevelopedtoevaluatecancerrisk.Foracuteandchronichealtheffects,asimilarfactor,calledaHazardIndex,isusedtoevaluaterisk.TACsareidentifiedandtheirtoxicityisstudiedbytheCaliforniaOfficeofEnvironmentalHealthHazardAssessment(OEHHA).ExamplesofTACsourcesincludeindustrialprocesses,drycleaners,gasolinestations,paintandsolventoperations,andfossilfuelcombustionsources.

Sulfur Oxides 

Sulfuroxidesareanyofseveralcompoundsofsulfurandoxygen,ofwhichthemostrelevanttoairqualityisSO2.SO2isarespiratoryirritantthatcausesthebronchiolestoconstrictwithinhalationat5partspermillion(ppm)ormore.Oncontactwiththemoistmucousmembranes,SO2producessulfurousacid,whichisadirectirritant.Concentrationratherthandurationoftheexposureisanimportantdeterminantofrespiratoryeffects.ExposuretohighSO2concentrationsmayresultinedemaofthelungsorglottisandrespiratoryparalysis.SO2isproducedbycoalandoilcombustionandsuchstationarysourcesassteelmills,refineries,andpulpandpapermills.

Lead 

Lead(Pb)isametalthatisanaturalconstituentofair,water,andthebiosphere.Leadisneithercreatednordestroyedintheenvironment,soitpersistsforever.Leadwasusedseveraldecadesagotoincreasetheoctaneratinginautomotivefuel;therefore,gasoline‐poweredautomobileengineswereamajorsourceofairbornelead.Sincetheuseofleadedfuelhasbeenmostlyphasedout,theambientconcentrationsofleadhavedroppeddramatically.

Short‐termexposuretohighlevelsofleadcancausevomiting,diarrhea,convulsions,coma,orevendeath.However,evensmallamountsofleadcanbeharmful,especiallytoinfants,youngchildren,andpregnantwomen.Leadexposureismostseriousforyoungchildrenbecausetheyabsorblead

Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis

Air Quality 

 

APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐11 

October 2014ICF 00323.08

 

moreeasilythanadultsandaremoresusceptibletoitsharmfuleffects.Evenlow‐levelexposuremayharmtheintellectualdevelopment,behavior,size,andhearingofinfants.Duringpregnancy,especiallyinthelasttrimester,leadcanadverselyaffectthefetus.Femaleworkersexposedtohighlevelsofleadhavemoremiscarriagesandstillbirths.

Symptomsoflong‐termexposuretolowerleadlevelsmaybelessnoticeablebutarestillserious.Anemiaiscommon,anddamagetothenervoussystemmaycauseimpairedmentalfunction.Othersymptomsareappetiteloss,abdominalpain,constipation,fatigue,sleeplessness,irritability,andheadache.Continuedexcessiveexposure,asinanindustrialsetting,canaffectthekidneys.

Diesel Particulate Matter 

In1998,ARBidentifiedDPMasatoxicaircontaminant(CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard1998).Onastatewidebasis,theaveragepotentialcancerriskassociatedwithDPMismorethan500potentialcasespermillionpeople.TheOEHHAestimatedthepotentialcancerriskfroma70‐yearexposuretoDPMataconcentrationof1microgrampercubicmeter(µg/m3)rangesfrom130to2,400excesscancercasespermillionpeople.Ascientificreviewpanelconcludedthatanappropriatepointestimateofunitriskfora70‐yearexposuretoDPMis300excesscancercasespermillionpeople(CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard2000).

TheDPMofgreatesthealthconcernarethoseinthecategoriesoffine(PM10)andultra‐fine(PM2.5).Thesefineandultra‐fineparticlesmaybecomposedofelementalcarbonwithadsorbedcompounds,suchasorganiccompounds,sulfate,nitrate,metals,andothertraceelements.Thefineandultra‐fineparticlesarerespirable,whichmeansthattheycanavoidmanyofthehumanrespiratorysystemdefensemechanismsandenterdeeplyintothelungs.

Existing Air Quality Conditions 

Existingairqualityconditionsinthestudyareacanbecharacterizedbymonitoringdatacollectedintheregion.ThoughtheLivermore–793RinconAvenuemonitoringstationisthecloseststationtotheprogramarea,thismonitoringstationdoesnotreportCOorPM10conditionsinthearea.TheclosestmonitoringstationtomonitorCOistheFremont–ChapelWaymonitoringstationlocatedapproximately20mileswestandmostlyupwindoftheprogramarea.TheclosestmonitoringstationtomonitorPM10istheTracy–Airportmonitoringstationlocatedapproximately12mileseastoftheprogramareainSanJoaquinCounty.RecentairqualitymonitoringresultsfromthesestationsaresummarizedinTable3.3‐2.Thedatarepresentairqualitymonitoringforthelast3yearsforwhichacompletedatasetisavailable(2010–2012).AsindicatedinTable3.3‐2,therehavebeensomeviolationsofstateandfederalairqualitystandardsduringthistimeperiodforozoneandPM2.5.

Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis

Air Quality 

 

APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐12 

October 2014ICF 00323.08

 

Table 3.3‐2. Summary of 2010‐2012 Ambient Air Quality in the Program Area Vicinity 

PollutantStandards 2010 2011 2012

Ozone(O3)—Livermore–795 RinconAvenue

Maximum1‐hourconcentration(ppm) 0.150 0.115 0.102

DaysexceedingatheCAAQS1‐hourstandard(>0.09ppm) 3 3 2

Maximum8‐hourconcentration(ppm) 0.098 0.085 0.090

DaysexceedingatheCAAQS8‐hour(>0.070ppm) 6 9 4

DaysexceedingatheNAAQS8‐hour(>0.075ppm) 3 2 3

Carbonmonoxide(CO)—Fremont–ChapelWay

Maximum8‐hourconcentration(ppm) 0.94 – –

DaysexceedingatheNAAQS8‐hour(>9ppm) 0 0 0

DaysexceedingatheCAAQS8‐hour(>9.0ppm) 0 0 0

NitrogenDioxide(NO2)—Livermore–795 RinconAvenue

Statemaximum1‐hourconcentration(ppm) 0.058 0.057 0.043

Annualaverageconcentration(ppm) 0.011 0.011 –

DaysexceedingatheCAAQS1‐hour(0.18ppm) 0 0 0

Particulatematter(PM10)—Tracy–Airport

Nationalbmaximum24‐hourconcentration(g/m3) 28.5 110.8 73.4

Statecmaximum24‐hourconcentration(g/m3) – – –

DaysexceedingatheNAAQS24‐hour(>150g/m3)g 0 0 0

DaysexceedingatheCAAQS24‐hour(>50g/m3)g – – –

Particulatematter(PM2.5)—Livermore–795 RinconAvenue

Nationalbmaximum24‐hourconcentration(g/m3) 34.7 45.4 31.1

Statecmaximum24‐hourconcentration(g/m3) 34.7 23.6 –

DaysexceedingatheNAAQS24‐hour(>35g/m3) 0 2 0

Source:CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard2013b.ppm = partspermillion.CAAQS = CaliforniaAmbientAirQualityStandards.NAAQS = NationalAmbientAirQualityStandards.g/m3 = microgramspercubicmeter.– = datanotavailable.a Anexceedanceisnotnecessarilyaviolation.Thisisamathematicalestimateofhowmanydaysconcentrationswouldhavebeenmeasuredashigherthanthelevelofthestandardhadeachdaybeenmonitored.Valueshavebeenrounded.

b Measurementsusuallyarecollectedevery6days.c Statecriteriaforensuringthatdataaresufficientlycompleteforcalculatingvalidannualaveragesaremorestringentthanthenationalcriteria.

Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis

Air Quality 

 

APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐13 

October 2014ICF 00323.08

 

Attainment Status 

Localmonitoringdata(Table3.3‐2)areusedtodesignateareasasnonattainment,maintenance,attainment,orunclassifiedfortheNAAQSandCAAQS.Thefourdesignationsaredefinedasfollows.

Nonattainment—assignedtoareaswheremonitoredpollutantconcentrationsconsistentlyviolatethestandardinquestion.

Maintenance—assignedtoareaswheremonitoredpollutantconcentrationsexceededthestandardinquestioninthepastbutarenolongerinviolationofthatstandard.

Attainment—assignedtoareaswherepollutantconcentrationsmeetthestandardinquestionoveradesignatedperiodoftime.

Unclassified—assignedtoareasweredataareinsufficienttodeterminewhetherapollutantisviolatingthestandardinquestion.

Table3.3‐3summarizestheattainmentstatusofAlamedaCountywithregardtotheNAAQSandCAAQS.Table3.3‐4summarizestheattainmentstatusoftheSJVABwithregardtotheNAAQSandCAAQS(SanJoaquinValleyAirPollutionControlDistrict2013).

Table 3.3‐3. Federal and State Attainment Status for Alameda County 

CriteriaPollutant FederalDesignation StateDesignation

O3(1‐hour) (Nofederalstandard)a SeriousNonattainment

O3(8‐hour) MarginalNonattainment(2008) Nonattainment

CO Maintenance Attainment

PM10 Attainment Nonattainment

PM2.5 Nonattainment(2006) Nonattainment

NO2 Attainment Attainment

SO2 Attainment Attainment

Lead Attainment(2008) Attainment

Sulfates (NoFederalStandard) AttainmentHydrogensulfide (NoFederalStandard) UnclassifiedVisibility (NoFederalStandard) UnclassifiedSources:CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard2011;U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency2012.O3 = ozone.CO = carbonmonoxide.PM10 = particulatematterlessthanorequalto10microns.PM2.5 = particulatematterlessthanorequalto2.5microns.NO2 = nitrogendioxide.SO2 = sulfurdioxide.a Thefederal1‐hourstandardof12partsperhundredmillion(pphm)wasineffectfrom1979throughJune15,2005.Therevokedstandardisreferencedherebecauseitwasemployedforsuchalongperiodandbecausethisbenchmarkisaddressedinthestateimplementationplans.

Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis

Air Quality 

 

APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐14 

October 2014ICF 00323.08

 

Table 3.3‐4. Federal and State Attainment Status for San Joaquin Valley 

CriteriaPollutant FederalDesignation StateDesignation

O3(1‐hour) (NoFederalStandard) SevereNonattainment

O3(8‐hour) ExtremeNonattainment Nonattainment

CO Attainment Attainment

PM10 Attainment Nonattainment

PM2.5 Nonattainment(2006) Nonattainment

NO2 Attainment Attainment

SO2 Attainment Attainment

Lead NoDesignation Attainment

Sulfates (NoFederalStandard) AttainmentHydrogensulfide (NoFederalStandard) UnclassifiedVisibility (NoFederalStandard) UnclassifiedO3 = ozone.CO = carbonmonoxide.PM10 = particulatematterlessthanorequalto10microns.PM2.5 = particulatematterlessthanorequalto2.5microns.NO2 = nitrogendioxide.SO2 = sulfurdioxide.

Sensitive Receptors 

Forthepurposesofairqualityanalysis,sensitivelandusesaredefinedaslocationswherehumanpopulations,especiallychildren,seniors,andsickpersonsarelocatedandwherethereisreasonableexpectationofcontinuoushumanexposureaccordingtotheaveragingperiodfortheairqualitystandards(e.g.,24‐hour,8‐hour,and1‐hour).Typicalsensitivereceptorsincluderesidences,hospitals,andschools.WhiletheprogramareaislocatedintheruralsettingoftheAltamontPass,sensitivereceptorsintheprogramareavicinityincludescatteredresidencesthroughoutandadjacenttotheprogramarea.AsindicatedinChapter2ofthisPEIR,ProgramDescription,AlamedaCountyhasestablishedsetbackrequirementsforsitingturbineswithincertaintypesoflanduses(e.g.,residential,commercial,recreational),andinfrastructure(publicroads),andturbineswouldnotbelocatedwithinthesesetbackdistances.Outsidetheprogramarea,approximately4,500feettothewestoftheprogramareaisacommunityofsinglefamilyresidencesinthecityofLivermore,and5,000feettotheeastisthecommunityofMountainHouse,whichcontainssinglefamilyresidences,threeelementaryschoolsandchildcarefacilities,andpublicparksandopenspaces.

3.3.2 Environmental Impacts 

Methods for Analysis 

Criteriapollutantemissionswereestimatedforconstructionandoperationalactivitiesataprogrammaticlevelwithadditionaldetailgiventotwospecificrepoweringprojects,theGoldenHillsandPattersonPassProjects,whichfallwithintheprogramarea.Emissionswerecalculatedforatypical80MWrepoweringprojectusingprojectdatafromtheVascoWindsRepoweringProjectDraftEnvironmentalImpactReport(ContraCostaCounty2010).Thiswasdonebecauseproject‐specificinformationfortheproposedprojectswasverylimited,andtherepoweringactivitiesarenotyet

Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis

Air Quality 

 

APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐15 

October 2014ICF 00323.08

 

determined.BecausetheVascoexampleprovidesacomprehensiveanalysisoftypicalconstructionactivityforrepowering,itwasusedtoestimatetotalanddailyemissionsfortheproposedprojects,asitisconsideredrepresentativeofatypicalprojectassociatedwiththeprogram.TotalemissionsfromtheVascoexamplewerethenscaledtotheprogramandtheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassProjectsbasedonthenameplatecapacityoftheprogramarea.Thescalingfactorsfortotalconstructionemissionsareasfollows:5.21forprogramAlternative1:417MW(416.5MWnameplatecapacity÷80MWmetricnameplatecapacity);5.63forprogramAlternative2:450MW(450MWnameplatecapacity÷80MWmetricnameplatecapacity);1.11fortheGoldenHillsProject(88.4MWnameplatecapacity÷80MWmetricnameplatecapacity);and0.25forthePattersonPassProject(19.8MWnameplatecapacity÷80MWmetricnameplatecapacity).AnnualconstructionemissionsfromtheVascoexamplewerealsoscaledtotheprogramandtheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassProjectsusingamaximumannualnameplatecapacityof100MWinstalled.Thisproducesascalingfactorof1.25toestimateannualemissionsfrombothAlternative1andAlternative2(100MWmaximum÷80MWmetricnameplatecapacity).SincethenameplatecapacityoftheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassProjectsarelessthan100MW,itwasassumedthatallemissionsfromtheseprojectswouldoccurduringonecalendaryear.

Constructionemissionswereestimatedforeachphaseofconstructionforthreemajorcontributors:offroadequipment,onroadvehicles(includingtrucktripsandworkercommutes),andconcretebatchplantoperations.Calculationmethodsfromthefollowingsourceswereusedtoestimateemissions:theCaliforniaEmissionsEstimatorModel(CalEEMod)(SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict2011),theEPAEmissionsFactors&AP42CompilationofAirPollutantEmissionFactorsdocument(U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency1995a,1995b,1995c),andtheARBEMissionFACtors(EMFAC)2011model(CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard2013c).Additionalstandardemissionfactors,conversionfactors,andmethodswereusedtoestimateemissionsperstandardairqualityprotocolconsistentwithBAAQMDguidance.

Operationalemissionswereestimatedforoffroadequipment(maintenance/operationactivities)andonroadvehicles(includingtrucktripsandworkercommutes).Calculationmethodsfromthesamesourcesaslistedaboveforconstructionemissionswereusedtoestimateoperationalemissions.

Theconcretebatchplantwouldproducefugitivedustemissionsduringthemanufactureofconcrete.Approximately0.0157poundsofPM10wouldbeemittedpercubicyardofconcreteproduced(U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency1995c).ItwasassumedthatPM2.5represents0.674%ofPM10(SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict2006).Stationarysourceemissionsfromfuelcombustionatthebatchplantswerenotestimatedbecausespecificdataonthetypesofequipment(generators,engines,etc.)thatwouldbeusedatthebatchplantswerenotavailable.Inaddition,thebatchplantsarepermittedsourcesunderBAAQMDandemissionswouldbeminorafterrequiredairdistrictBestAvailableControlTechnologies(BACTs)andoffsets.

Importantassumptions(associatedwiththe80MWprojectexample)usedintheanalysisarepresentedbelow.

Emissionswereestimatedforatypical80MWrepoweringprojectandscaledtotheprogram,GoldenHillsProject,andPattersonPassProjectbasedonthenameplatecapacityoftheprogramareaandthetwoprojectareas.

Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis

Air Quality 

 

APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐16 

October 2014ICF 00323.08

 

Fortheprogramalternatives,themaximumannualnameplatecapacityinstalledis100MW.Thisproducesascalingfactorof1.25foremissionsfromthe80MWprojectVascoexampletoestimateannualemissionsfrombothAlternative1andAlternative2.

Offroadequipmenttypes,fueltypes,andphasing(daysofconstructionforeachconstructionphaseforeachmonthoftheyear)forconstructionandoperationalactivitiesweretakenfromtheVascoWindsRepoweringProjectDraftEnvironmentalImpactReport(ContraCostaCounty2010).

Constructionactivitywilloccur8hoursperday,5daysperweek.

FugitivedustemissionsfromgradingarecalculatedforgradersandbulldozersusingCalEEModmethods,whichcalculateemissionsonaper‐milebasisforgradersandaper‐hourbasisforbulldozers.Eachgradertravelsatanaveragespeedof7.1mphwithabladewidthof12feettocover292totalacresforatotalmileageofgradingof201miles(8.3milesaverageperday).Eachbulldozeroperates8hoursperdayduringconstruction.

Therewillbe10,800annual(55averagedaily)light‐dutytrucktrips,16,605annual(85averagedaily)heavy‐dutytrucktripsformaterialdeliveryandremoval,and6,338annual(33averagedaily)heavy‐dutytrucktripsforwaterdelivery(watertankers).

Eachlight‐dutytripwillinclude1.0mileof15mphtravel(ridgeline),1.0mileof25mphtravel(accessroads),and23milesof55mphtravel(freeway),foratotalroundtripdistanceof25miles.

Eachheavy‐dutytripwillinclude5.0milesof15mphtravel(ridgeline),1.0mileof25mphtravel(accessroads),and29milesof55mphtravel(freeway)foratotalroundtripdistanceof35miles.Eachwatertankertrucktripwouldinclude6.0milesof15mphtravel(ridgeline),1.0mileof25mphtravel(accessroads),and19milesof55mphtravel(freeway),foratotalroundtripdistanceof26miles.

Workercommuteroundtripsare25miles;workervehiclestravelatanaverageof55mph.Therewillbe16,790annual(86averagedailyand150maximumdaily)workercommutetripsforconstructionand2,226annual(8.5averagedaily)workercommutetripsforoperation.

Approximately3,500cubicyardsofconcretewillbeproducedattheconcretebatchplantsperyear(55cubicyardsonaverageperday).

Determination of Significance 

InaccordancewithAppendixGoftheStateCEQAGuidelines,programAlternative1,programAlternative2,theGoldenHillsproject,orthePattersonPassprojectwouldbenormallyconsideredtohaveasignificanteffectifitwouldresultinanyoftheconditionslistedbelow.

Conflictwithorobstructimplementationoftheapplicableairqualityplan.

Violateanyairqualitystandardorcontributesubstantiallytoanexistingorprojectedairqualityviolation.

Resultinacumulativelyconsiderablenetincreaseofanycriteriapollutantforwhichtheprogramorprojectregionisanonattainmentareaforanapplicablefederalorstateambientairqualitystandard(includingreleasingemissionsthatexceedquantitativethresholdsforozoneprecursors).

Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis

Air Quality 

 

APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐17 

October 2014ICF 00323.08

 

Exposesensitivereceptorstosubstantialpollutantconcentrations.

Createobjectionableodorsaffectingasubstantialnumberofpeople

AccordingtotheStateCEQAGuidelines,thesignificancecriteriaestablishedbytheapplicableairqualitymanagementorairpollutioncontroldistrictmaybereliedontomakesignificancedeterminationsforpotentialimpactsonenvironmentalresources.Consequently,theanalysisusedinthisdocumentusesmethodologiesprovidedintheupdatedBAAQMDGuidelines(BayAreaAirQualityManagementDistrict2012).Althoughthe2010BAAQMDGuidelinesandtheir2011updatehavebeenchallengedincourt,andBAAQMDhasremovedallreferencesofthe2010/2011adoptedthresholdsfromthe2012BAAQMDGuidelines,the2010/2011BAAQMDGuidelinescontainquantitativesignificancethresholdsforproject‐relatedconstructionexhaustemissionsandoperationalemissions.Becausethe2010/2011thresholdsaremorestringentandcomprehensivethanthe1999thresholds(asrecommendedforuseinthe2012BAAQMDGuidelines),the2010/2011thresholdsareusedtodeterminesignificanceforconstructionandoperationalactivities(BayAreaAirQualityManagementDistrict2011).Therearenoquantitativethresholdsforconstructionimpactsassociatedwithfugitivedust,sotheseimpactsareaddressedusingapplicableBAAQMD‐recommendedmitigationmeasuresfordustabatement.

Underthe2010/2011BAAQMDthresholds,aprojectwouldhaveasignificantshort‐termconstruction‐relatedorlong‐termoperationalairqualityimpactifitwouldexceedBAAQMD’sthresholdsshowninTable3.3‐5.

Table 3.3‐5. BAAQMD Thresholds of Significance 

Pollutant Construction Operations

ROG 54lbs/day 54lbs/dayor10tons/year

NOX 54lbs/day 54lbs/dayor10tons/year

CO – ViolationofCAAQS

PM10(total) – –

PM10(exhaust) 82lbs/day 82lbs/dayor15tons/year

PM2.5(exhaust) 54lbs/day 54lbs/dayor10tons/year

PM10/PM2.5(fugitivedust)

BMPs –

TACs(project‐level) Increasedcancerriskof10in1million;increasednon‐cancerriskofgreaterthan1.0(hazardindex[HI]);PM2.5increaseofgreaterthan0.3microgramspercubicmeter

Sameasconstruction

TACs(cumulative) Increasedcancerriskof100in1million;increasednon‐cancerriskofgreaterthan10.0;PM2.5increaseofgreaterthan0.8microgrampercubicmeteratreceptorswithin1,000feet

Sameasconstruction

Odors – Fivecomplaintsperyearaveragedover3years

Source:BayAreaAirQualityManagementDistrict2011.lbs = pounds.CAAQS = CaliforniaAmbientAirQualityStandards.BMPs = bestmanagementpractices.

Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis

Air Quality 

 

APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐18 

October 2014ICF 00323.08

 

Bothaveragedailyandmaximumdailyemissionswerecalculatedfortheproject,andmaximumdailyemissionswerecomparedtothedailythresholdslistedinTable3.3‐5,pertherecommendationofBAAQMDstaff(Kirkpers.comm.).

ForprojectsthatwouldresultinanincreaseinROG,NOX,PM10,orPM2.5ofmorethantheirrespectiveproject‐leveldailymassthresholdsindicatedinTable3.3‐5,thenitwouldalsobeconsideredtocontributeconsiderablytoasignificantcumulativeimpact.Indevelopingthresholdsofsignificanceforairpollutants,BAAQMDconsideredtheemissionlevelsforwhichaproject’sindividualemissionswouldbecumulativelyconsiderable.Therefore,ifaprojectwouldexceedtheproject‐levelsignificancethresholdsidentifiedinTable3.3‐5,itsemissionswouldbecumulativelyconsiderable;ifaprojectwouldnotexceedthesignificancethresholds,itsemissionswouldnotbecumulativelyconsiderable.

InadditiontoemissionsthatwouldbegeneratedinBAAQMD’sjurisdiction,theportionofequipmentandmaterialhaultripsthatwouldoriginateatthePortofStocktonandinthecityofTracywouldbegeneratedintheSJVAB,whichisunderSJVAPCD’sjurisdiction.Therefore,theheavy‐dutytrucktripexhaustemissionsthatwouldbegeneratedintheSJVABhavebeenquantified.Inaddition,theSJVABisdownwindoftheprojectsiteandmayreceivesomeemissionsthatareemittedattheprojectsitewithintheSFBAABduetotransport.However,itisextremelydifficultandwouldbespeculativetodeterminethequantityofemissionsthatwilltraverseairbasinboundariesduetothehighvariabilityinwindpatternsandlocalweather.Therefore,theseemissionswerenotestimatednorcomparedtotheSJVAPCD’sthresholds.

SJVAPCD’spublishedguidelines,GuideforAssessingAirQualityImpacts(SanJoaquinValleyAirPollutionControlDistrict2002),donotrequirethequantificationofconstructionemissions.Rather,itrequiresimplementationofeffectiveandcomprehensivefeasiblecontrolmeasurestoreducePM10emissions(SanJoaquinValleyAirPollutionControlDistrict2002).SJVAPCDconsidersPM10emissionstobethegreatestpollutantofconcernwhenassessingconstruction‐relatedairqualityimpactsandhasdeterminedthatcompliancewithitsRegulationVIII,includingimplementationofallfeasiblecontrolmeasuresspecifiedinitsguidancemanual(SanJoaquinValleyAirPollutionControlDistrict2002),constitutessufficientmitigationtoreduceconstruction‐relatedPM10emissionstoless‐than‐significantlevelsandminimizeadverseairqualityeffects.AllconstructionprojectsmustabidebyRegulationVIII.Sincethepublicationofthedistrict’sguidancemanual,thedistricthasrevisedsomeoftherulescomprisingRegulationVIII.GuidancefromdistrictstaffindicatesthatimplementationofadustcontrolplanwouldsatisfyalloftherequirementsofRegulationVIII(Siongpers.comm.).FurtherconsultationwithSJVAPCDstaffindicatesthat,thoughexplicitthresholdsforconstruction‐relatedemissionsofozoneprecursorsarenotenumeratedintheguidancemanual,SJVAPCDconsidersasignificantimpacttooccurwhenconstructionemissionsofROGorNOXexceed10tonsperyearorifPM10orPM2.5emissionsexceed15tonsperyear(Siongpers.comm.).

SJVAPCD’sthresholdsofsignificanceusedinthisanalysis,asindicatedinitsGuideforAssessingandMitigatingAirQualityImpacts(SanJoaquinValleyAirPollutionControlDistrict2002)andthroughconsultationwithSJVAPCDstaff,aresummarizedbelow.

Projectimplementationwouldproduceemissionsincreasesgreaterthan10tons/yearROG.

Projectimplementationwouldproduceemissionsincreasesgreaterthan10tons/yearNOX.

Projectimplementationwouldproduceemissionsincreasesgreaterthan15tons/yearPM10.

Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis

Air Quality 

 

APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐19 

October 2014ICF 00323.08

 

Projectimplementationwouldproduceemissionsincreasesgreaterthan15tons/yearPM2.5

SJVAPCDdoesnothaveestablishedquantitativeCEQAthresholdsforconstructionactivities.Therefore,inlieuofCEQAsignificancethresholdsforconstructionemissions,estimatedemissionsthatwouldbegeneratedbytheproposedprojectsundertheprogramintheSJVABarecomparedtoSJVAPCD’soperationalCEQAthresholdof10tonsperyearforbothNOXandROGand15tonsperyearforbothPM10andPM2.5(SanJoaquinValleyAirPollutionControlDistrict2002).UndertheSJVAPCDthresholds,aprojectwouldhaveasignificantshort‐termconstruction‐relatedorlong‐termoperationalairqualityimpactifitwouldexceedSJVAPCD’sthresholdsshowninTable3.3‐6.

Table 3.3‐6. SJVAPCD Thresholds of Significance 

Pollutant Construction Operations

ROG – 10tons/year

NOX – 10tons/year

CO – ViolationofCAAQS

PM10(total) – 15tons/year

PM2.5(total) – 15tons/year

Sources:SanJoaquinValleyAirPollutionControlDistrict2002;Siongpers.comm.CAAQS=CaliforniaAmbientAirQualityStandards.

Impacts and Mitigation Measures 

ImpactAQ‐1a‐1:Conflictwithorobstructimplementationoftheapplicableairqualityplan—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificant)

Inordertodeterminethataprojectisconsistentwiththeapplicableairqualityplan,whichinthiscaseistheBayArea2010CleanAirPlan(BayArea2010CAP),itisnecessarytodemonstratethatprogramAlternative1doesnotexceedthepopulationoremploymentgrowthassumptionscontainedintheplan,whichwouldleadtoincreasedvehiclemilestraveledbeyondthoseestimatedintheplan.ImplementationofAlternative1wouldresultinnonewpermanentemployeesrelativetoexistingconditions,norwoulditincreasepopulationprojections.Therefore,Alternative1wouldnotinducepopulationoremploymentgrowthandwouldresultinnonetincreaseinvehiclemilestraveledintheSFBAAB.Alternative1’spotentialimpactsonpopulationandhousingarediscussedinChapter3.12,Population;potentialtransportation‐relatedimpactsarediscussedinSection3.16,Traffic.

Inaddition,althoughshort‐termmitigatedemissionsresultingfromAlternative1constructionwouldexceedtheBAAQMDsignificancethresholdsforROGandNOX(seeImpactAQ‐2a‐1),Alternative1wouldresultinlong‐termbenefitsfromnewrenewablewind‐generatedenergy,includingreductionofROGandNOXemissionsrelativetotheproductionofcomparableenergyfromfossilfuelsources.Thus,Alternative1wouldbeconsistentwiththeBayArea2010CAPregardlessofthisshort‐termimpact.

ItisassumedthattruckstransportingsomecomponentsandaggregatewouldtravelfromthePortofStocktonandthecityofTracythroughportionsoftheSJVABtotheprogramarea.However,SJVAPCDrulesandcleanairplanswouldnotbeapplicabletoAlternative1becausetheprogramareaislocatedintheSFBAAB.Therefore,noconflictwithSJVAPCDcleanairplanswouldoccur.

Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis

Air Quality 

 

APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐20 

October 2014ICF 00323.08

 

Thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.Nomitigationisrequired.

ImpactAQ‐1a‐2:Conflictwithorobstructimplementationoftheapplicableairqualityplan—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificant)

Inordertodeterminethataprojectisconsistentwiththeapplicableairqualityplan,whichinthiscaseistheBayArea2010CleanAirPlan(BayArea2010CAP),itisnecessarytodemonstratethatprogramAlternative2doesnotexceedthepopulationoremploymentgrowthassumptionscontainedintheplan,whichwouldleadtoincreasedvehiclemilestraveledbeyondthoseestimatedintheplan.ImplementationofAlternative2wouldresultinnonewpermanentemployeesrelativetoexistingconditions,norwoulditincreasepopulationprojections.Therefore,Alternative2wouldnotinducepopulationoremploymentgrowthandwouldresultinnonetincreaseinvehiclemilestraveledintheSFBAAB.Alternative2’spotentialimpactsonpopulationandhousingarediscussedinChapter3.12,Population;potentialtransportation‐relatedimpactsarediscussedinSection3.16,Traffic.

Inaddition,althoughshort‐termmitigatedemissionsresultingfromAlternative2constructionwouldexceedtheBAAQMDsignificancethresholdsforROGandNOX(seeImpactAQ‐2a‐2),Alternative2wouldresultinlong‐termbenefitsfromnewrenewablewind‐generatedenergy,includingreductionofROGandNOXemissionsrelativetotheproductionofcomparableenergyfromfossilfuelsources.Thus,Alternative2wouldbeconsistentwiththeBayArea2010CAPregardlessofthisshort‐termimpact.

ItisassumedthattruckstransportingsomecomponentsandaggregatewouldtravelfromthePortofStocktonandthecityofTracythroughportionsoftheSJVABtotheprogramarea.However,SJVAPCDrulesandcleanairplanswouldnotbeapplicabletoAlternative2becausetheprogramareaislocatedintheSFBAAB.Therefore,noconflictwithSJVAPCDcleanairplanswouldoccur.

Thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.Nomitigationisrequired.

ImpactAQ‐1b:Conflictwithorobstructimplementationoftheapplicableairqualityplan—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificant)

TheimpactfortheGoldenHillsProjectissimilartothatoftheprogram.ImplementationoftheGoldenHillsProjectwouldresultinnonewpermanentemployeesrelativetoexistingconditions,norwoulditincreasepopulationprojections.Therefore,theGoldenHillsProjectwouldnotinducepopulationoremploymentgrowthandwouldresultinnonetincreaseinvehiclemilestraveledintheSFBAAB.TheGoldenHillsProject’spotentialimpactsonpopulationandhousingarediscussedinChapter3.12,Population;potentialtransportation‐relatedimpactsarediscussedinSection3.16,Traffic.

Inaddition,althoughshort‐termmitigatedemissionsresultingfromGoldenHillsProjectconstructionwouldexceedtheBAAQMDsignificancethresholdforNOX(seeImpactAQ‐2b),theGoldenHillsProjectwouldresultinlong‐termbenefitsfromnewrenewablewind‐generatedenergy,includingreductionofNOXemissionsrelativetotheproductionofcomparableenergyfromfossilfuelsources.Thus,theGoldenHillsProjectwouldbeconsistentwiththeBayArea2010CAPregardlessofthisshort‐termimpact.

Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis

Air Quality 

 

APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐21 

October 2014ICF 00323.08

 

ItisassumedthattruckstransportingsomecomponentsandaggregatewouldtravelfromthePortofStocktonandthecityofTracythroughportionsoftheSJVABtotheprojectarea.However,SJVAPCDrulesandcleanairplanswouldnotbeapplicabletotheproposedprojectbecausetheprojectareaislocatedintheSFBAAB.Therefore,noconflictwithSJVAPCDcleanairplanswouldoccur.

Thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.Nomitigationisrequired.

ImpactAQ‐1c:Conflictwithorobstructimplementationoftheapplicableairqualityplan—PattersonPassProject(lessthansignificant)

TheimpactforthePattersonPassProjectissimilartothatoftheprogram.ImplementationofthePattersonPassProjectwouldresultinnonewpermanentemployeesrelativetoexistingconditions,norwoulditincreasepopulationprojections.Therefore,thePattersonPassProjectwouldnotinducepopulationoremploymentgrowthandwouldresultinnonetincreaseinvehiclemilestraveledintheSFBAAB.ThePattersonPassProject’spotentialimpactsonpopulationandhousingarediscussedinChapter3.12,Population;potentialtransportation‐relatedimpactsarediscussedinSection3.16,Traffic.

Inaddition,althoughshort‐termmitigatedemissionsresultingfromPattersonPassProjectconstructionwouldexceedtheBAAQMDsignificancethresholdforNOX(seeImpactAQ‐2c),thePattersonPassProjectwouldresultinlong‐termbenefitsfromnewrenewablewind‐generatedenergy,includingreductionofNOXemissionsrelativetotheproductionofcomparableenergyfromfossilfuelsources.Accordingly,thePattersonPassProjectwouldbeconsistentwiththeBayArea2010CAPregardlessofthisshort‐termimpact.

ItisassumedthattruckstransportingsomecomponentsandaggregatewouldtravelfromthePortofStocktonandthecityofTracythroughportionsoftheSJVABtotheprojectarea.However,SJVAPCDrulesandcleanairplanswouldnotbeapplicabletotheproposedprojectbecausetheprojectareaislocatedintheSFBAAB.Therefore,noconflictwithSJVAPCDcleanairplanswouldoccur.

Thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.Nomitigationisrequired.

ImpactAQ‐2a‐1:Violateanyairqualitystandardorcontributesubstantiallytoanexistingorprojectedairqualityviolation—programAlternative1:417MW(significantandunavoidable)

Construction Activities 

Basedontheassumptionspresentedabove,constructionofthevariousprojectsundertheprogramwouldoccuroveraperiodof9monthsperyearforapproximately4years.Itisestimatedthattherewouldbeapproximately184workdaysperyearthatwouldinvolvetheuseofheavyconstructionequipment.Constructionactivitiesattheprogramareawouldbeassociatedwithdecommissioningandfoundationremovalofexistingturbinesites;laydown,substations,andswitchyards;roadconstruction;turbinefoundationsandbatchplantoperation;turbinedeliveryandinstallation;utilitycollectorlineinstallation;andrestorationandclean‐up.Eachoftheseactivitieswouldoccuroverperiodsthatwouldrangefromapproximately2to4months.Itisestimatedthatasmanyas90piecesofoffroadconstructionequipment,includingcranes,excavators,graders,loaders,cementtrucks,anddozers,wouldberequiredforanaverageof8hoursperdaytoconstructvarious

Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis

Air Quality 

 

APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐22 

October 2014ICF 00323.08

 

projectsundertheprogram.Atanygiventime,from6to54piecesofconstructionequipmentwouldbeoperatingconcurrently,dependingontheconstructionphasing.

Inadditiontotheoffroadequipment,onroadvehicletripswouldberequiredtodelivermaterialsandequipmenttotheconstructionsitesaswellastotransportworkerstoandfromtheconstructionsites(seeChapter2,ProgramDescription,TrafficandParkingsection).Itisanticipatedthatanaverageofapproximately140trucktripsand86commutingworkertripswouldberequiredperdayduringthe9‐monthconstructionperiodforeachyear.Itisanticipatedthatthemajorityofequipmentandmaterial‐relatedtrucktripswouldoriginateatthePortofStocktonandinthecityofTracyandthattheconstructionworker–relatedcommutetripswouldoccurentirelywithintheSFBAAB.Theportionoftheequipment,material,andaggregatehaultripsthatwouldoriginateatthePortofStocktonandinthecityofTracywouldbegeneratedintheSJVAB,whichisunderSJVAPCD’sjurisdiction.Therefore,theheavy‐dutytrucktripexhaustemissionsthatwouldbegeneratedintheSJVABhavebeenquantifiedandcomparedtoSJVAPCDannualsignificancethresholds(Table3.3‐7).

Table 3.3‐7. Program Construction Exhaust and Fugitive Dust Emissions within the SJVAB—Maximum Daily Unmitigated Emissions 

ConstructionActivity

EstimatedMaximumAnnualUnmitigatedEmissions(tons/year)

ROG NOX CO SO2PM10Total

PM2.5Total

Offsitetrucktrips 0.28 9.71 1.50 0.02 0.32 0.24

Totalemissions 0.28 9.71 1.50 0.02 0.32 0.24

SJVAPCDsignificancethreshold 10 10 NA NA 15 15

Significantimpact? No No No No No No

CriteriapollutantemissionsofROG,NOX,CO,SO2,PM10,andPM2.5fromconstructionequipmentwouldincrementallyaddtotheregionalatmosphericloadingofthesepollutantsduring constructionofthevariousprojectsundertheprogram.Themaximumdailyunmitigatedconstruction‐relatedexhaustemissionsthatwouldoccurintheSFBAABhavebeenestimatedandarepresentedinTable3.3‐8.AsdiscussedaboveunderMethodsforAnalysis,constructionexhaustemissionswereestimatedusingtheCaliforniaEmissionsEstimatorModel(CalEEMod)(SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict2011),theEPAEmissionsFactors&AP42CompilationofAirPollutantEmissionFactorsdocument(U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency1995a,1995b,1995c),andtheARBEMissionFACtors(EMFAC)2011model(CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard2013c).Maximumdailyemissionswerecalculatedfortheperiodoftimewherethegreatestconstructionactivityisanticipatedtooccur.Thistimeperiodinvolvestheoverlapofconstructionphasesincludingdecommissioningandfoundationremoval,roadconstruction,andturbinefoundationsandbatchplant,alongwithoffsitetrucktripsandoffsiteworkertrips.Othernon‐overlappingconstructionphasescontributetoaveragedailyandaverageannualemissions,buttheyarenotcountedascontributingtothemaximumdailyemissionsthatoccurwhenthephaseslistedaboveoverlap.

Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis

Air Quality 

 

APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐23 

October 2014ICF 00323.08

 

Table 3.3‐8. Program Construction Exhaust and Fugitive Dust Emissions within the SFBAAB—Maximum Daily Unmitigated Emissions 

ConstructionActivity

EstimatedMaximumDailyUnmitigatedEmissions(pounds/day)

ROG NOX CO SO2PM10Exhaust

PM10Dust

PM2.5Exhaust

PM2.5Dust

Decommissioningandfoundationremoval

17.02 142.72 53.05 0.19 4.98 7.19 4.94 0.32

Laydown,substationsandswitchyards

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Roadconstruction 16.01 135.03 59.27 0.19 4.80 46.34 4.75 14.66

Turbinefoundationsandbatchplanta

26.74 226.40 96.79 0.31 7.94 24.84 7.82 20.16

Turbinedeliveryandinstallation

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Utilitycollectorlineinstallation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Restorationandcleanup 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Offsitetrucktrips 6.12 124.94 31.85 0.39 3.13 1.20 2.88 0.44

Offsiteworkertrips  0.33 1.49 10.84 0.13 0.01 0.26 0.01 0.10

Totalemissions 66.22 630.59 251.79 1.20 20.87 79.84 20.40 35.69

BAAQMDsignificancethreshold 54 54 NA NA 82 NA 54 NA

SignificantImpact? Yes Yes No No No No No No

Note: Constructionactivitywithzeroemissionsmeansthatthisactivityisnotanticipatedtooccurduringthetimeperiodproducingthemaximumdailyemissionsforconstruction.

a Includesconstructionactivitiesalongwithfugitivedustemissionsfromtheconcretebatchplants.

AsindicatedinTable3.3‐8,maximumdailyunmitigatedexhaustemissionsofROGandNOXwouldexceedBAAQMD’ssignificancethresholds,resultinginasignificantimpact.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2bwouldreduceconstruction‐relatedexhaustemissions.AsindicatedinTable3.3‐7,maximumannualunmitigatedexhaustemissionsofROGorNOXthatwouldbegeneratedintheSJVABwouldnotexceedSJVAPCD’ssignificancethresholds,resultinginaless‐than‐significantimpact.Asnotedabove,althoughtheSJVABisdownwindoftheprojectsiteandsomeemissionsthatareemittedattheprojectsitewithintheSFBAABwouldlikelydriftintotheSJVABduetotransport,theseemissionswerenotquantifiedduetothehighvariabilityinwindpatternsandlocalweatherandotherconditionsthatcontributetoemissiontransportanditwouldbespeculativetoquantifytheamountofproject‐relatedemissionsthatwouldtransportintotheSJVAB.Therefore,theseemissionswerenotestimatednorcomparedtotheSJVAPCD’sthresholds.

Inadditiontoexhaustemissions,emissionsoffugitivedustalsowouldbegeneratedbyprogram‐relatedconstructionactivitiesassociatedwithgradingandearthdisturbance,travelonpavedandunpavedroads,andoperationoftheconcretebatchplantandrockcrusher.Withregardtofugitivedustemissions,theBAAQMDGuidelinesfocusonimplementationofdustcontrolmeasuresratherthancomparingestimatedlevelsoffugitivedusttoquantitativesignificancethresholds.NewandmorecomprehensivefugitivedustcontrolmeasureshavebeenidentifiedbyBAAQMDinits2012guidelines.Therefore,BAAQMD’snewapplicablerecommendedfugitivedustcontrolmeasures,

Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis

Air Quality 

 

APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐24 

October 2014ICF 00323.08

 

whicharecontainedinMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2b,wouldbeimplementedtoreduceimpactsassociatedwithfugitivedustemissionstoaless‐than‐significantlevel.EventhoughtheBAAQMDGuidelinesdonotrequirethequantificationofconstruction‐relatedfugitivedustemissions,theseemissionswereestimatedforconstructionactivitiesforinformationalpurposesandarepresentedinTable3.3‐8.

IndividualprojectproponentsalsowouldberequiredtoobtainpermitsfromBAAQMDfortheproposedconstruction‐relatedoperationsoftheconcretebatchplantandtherockcrusher.Fugitivesourcesassociatedwiththesefacilitieswouldincludethetransferofsandandaggregate,truckloading,mixerloading,vehicletraffic,andwinderosionfromsandandaggregatestoragepiles.Permit stipulationswouldrequiretheuseofBACTs.Permitstipulationswouldlikelyfocusonincreasingmoisturecontentofthematerialsandmayrequiretheuseofwatersprays,enclosures,andbaghousedevices.ImplementationofBAAQMD’sBACTsforbatchplantsandcrushingequipmentwouldensurethatfugitivedustemissionsimpactsthatwouldbeassociatedwiththesefacilitieswouldbelessthansignificant.Asnotedabove,stationarysourceemissionsfromfuelcombustionatthebatchplantswerenotestimatedduetolackofdata.AlthoughtheseemissionswouldlikelybeminorafterBACTsareimplemented,theseemissionswouldcontributetothoseestimatedinTables3.3‐9through3.3‐11.

Table 3.3‐9. Program Operational Exhaust and Fugitive Dust Emissions for the SFBAAB—Maximum Daily Unmitigated Emissions 

OperationalActivity

EstimatedMaximumDailyUnmitigatedEmissions(pounds/day)

ROG NOX CO SO2PM10Exhaust

PM10Dust

PM2.5Exhaust

PM2.5Dust

Offsiteworkertrips 0.03 0.13 0.96 0.01 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.01

Maintenance/operation  3.38 28.05 12.52 0.04 1.15 0.73 1.14 0.04

Totalemissions 3.41 28.18 13.48 0.05 1.15 0.76 1.15 0.05

BAAQMDsignificancethreshold 54 54 NA NA 82 NA 54 NA

Significantimpact? No No No No No No No No

Table 3.3‐10. Program Operational Exhaust and Fugitive Dust Emissions for the SFBAAB—Maximum Annual Unmitigated Emissions 

OperationalActivity

EstimatedMaximumAnnualUnmitigatedEmissions(tons/day)

ROG NOX CO SO2PM10Exhaust

PM10Dust

PM2.5Exhaust

PM2.5Dust

Offsiteworkertrips 0.00 0.02 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Maintenance/operation  0.08 0.59 0.42 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.00

Totalemissions 0.08 0.61 0.54 0.00 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.00

BAAQMDsignificancethreshold 10 10 NA NA 15 NA 10 NA

Significantimpact? No No No No No No No No

Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis

Air Quality 

 

APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐25 

October 2014ICF 00323.08

 

Table 3.3‐11. Program Construction Exhaust and Fugitive Dust Emissions within the SFBAAB—Maximum Daily Mitigated Emissions 

ConstructionActivity

EstimatedMaximumDailyMitigatedEmissions(pounds/day)

ROG NOX CO SO2PM10Exhaust

PM10Dust

PM2.5Exhaust

PM2.5Dust

Decommissioningandfoundationremoval

17.02 114.18 53.05 0.19 2.74 3.24 2.72 0.15

Laydown,substationsandswitchyards

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Roadconstruction 16.01 108.02 59.27 0.19 2.64 20.85 2.61 6.60

Turbinefoundationsandbatchplanta

26.74 181.12 96.79 0.31 4.37 11.18 4.30 9.07

Turbinedeliveryandinstallation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Utilitycollectorlineinstallation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Restorationandcleanup 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Offsitetrucktrips 6.12 124.94 31.85 0.39 3.13 1.20 2.88 0.44

Offsiteworkertrips  0.33 1.49 10.84 0.13 0.01 0.26 0.01 0.10

Totalemissions 66.22 529.76 251.79 1.20 12.89 36.73 12.52 16.36

BAAQMDsignificancethreshold 54 54 NA NA 82 NA 54 NA

Significantimpact? Yes Yes No No No No No No

Note: Constructionactivitywithzeroemissionsmeansthatthisactivityisnotanticipatedtooccurduringthetimeperiodproducingthemaximumdailyemissionsforconstruction.

a Includesconstructionactivitiesalongwithfugitivedustemissionsfromtheconcretebatchplants.

Operational Activities 

Inadditiontoconstruction‐relatedemissions,theprogramwouldalsoresultinoperational‐relatedemissionsassociatedwithturbinemaintenanceactivities,substationoperation,andworkertripstoandfromtheprogramarea.However,dailyandannualemissionsofcriteriapollutantsassociatedwithoperationalactivitiesareanticipatedtobethesameundertheprogramasunderexistingcondition;consequently,theywouldnotresultinasignificantcontributiontoexistingairqualityviolations.Themaximumdailyunmitigatedoperation‐relatedemissionsthatwouldoccurintheSFBAABhavebeenestimatedandarepresentedinTable3.3‐9;maximumannualunmitigatedoperation‐relatedemissionsarepresentedinTable3.3‐10.

MitigationMeasureAQ‐2a:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingapplicableBAAQMDBasicConstructionMitigationMeasures

Theprojectproponentswillrequireallcontractorstocomplywiththefollowingrequirementsforallareaswithactiveconstructionactivities.

Allexposedsurfaces(e.g.,parkingareas,stagingareas,soilpiles,gradedareas,andunpavedaccessroads)willbewateredasneededtomaintaindustcontrolonsite—approximatelytwotimesperday.

Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis

Air Quality 

 

APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐26 

October 2014ICF 00323.08

 

Allhaultruckstransportingsoil,sand,orotherloosematerialoffsitewillbecovered.

Allvisiblemudordirttrack‐outontoadjacentpublicroadswillberemovedusingwetpowervacuumstreetsweepersatleastonceperday.Theuseofdrypowersweepingisprohibited.

Allvehiclespeedsonunpavedroadswillbelimitedto15mph.

Allroadways,driveways,andsidewalkstobepavedwillbecompletedassoonaspossible.Buildingpadswillbelaidassoonaspossibleaftergradingunlessseedingorsoilbindersareused.

Idlingtimeswillbeminimizedeitherbyshuttingequipmentoffwhennotinuseorreducingthemaximumidlingtimeto5minutes(asrequiredbytheCaliforniaairbornetoxicscontrolmeasureTitle13,Section2485ofCaliforniaCodeofRegulations[CCR]).Clearsignagewillbeprovidedforconstructionworkersatallaccesspoints.

Allconstructionequipmentwillbemaintainedandproperlytunedinaccordancewithmanufacturer’sspecifications.Allequipmentwillbecheckedbyacertifiedvisibleemissionsevaluator.

Postapubliclyvisiblesignwiththetelephonenumberandpersontocontactattheleadagencyregardingdustcomplaints.Thispersonwillrespondandtakecorrectiveactionwithin48hours.Theairdistrict’sphonenumberwillalsobevisibletoensurecompliancewithapplicableregulations.

MitigationMeasureAQ‐2b:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingmeasuresbasedonBAAQMD’sAdditionalConstructionMitigationMeasures

Theprojectproponentswillrequireallcontractorstocomplywiththefollowingrequirementsforallareaswithactiveconstructionactivities.

Duringconstructionactivities,allexposedsurfaceswillbewateredatafrequencyadequatetomeetandmaintainfugitivedustcontrolrequirementsofallrelevantairqualitymanagemententities.

Allexcavation,grading,and/ordemolitionactivitieswillbesuspendedwhenaveragewindspeedsexceed20mph,asmeasuredattheLivermoreMunicipalAirport.

Windbreaks(e.g.,trees,fences)willbeinstalledonthewindwardside(s)ofactivelydisturbedareasofconstruction.Windbreaksshouldhaveatmaximum50%airporosity.

Vegetativegroundcover(e.g.,fast‐germinatingnativegrassseed)willbeplantedindisturbedareasassoonaspossibleandwateredappropriatelyuntilvegetationisestablished.

Iffeasibleandpracticable,thesimultaneousoccurrenceofexcavation,grading,andground‐disturbingconstructionactivitiesonthesameareaatanyonetimewillbelimited.

Constructionvehiclesandmachinery,includingtheirtires,willbecleanedpriortoleavingtheconstructionareatoremovevegetationandsoil.Cleaningstationswillbeestablishedattheperimeteroftheconstructionarea.

Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis

Air Quality 

 

APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐27 

October 2014ICF 00323.08

 

Siteaccessestoadistanceof100feetfromthepavedroadwillbetreatedwitha6to12inchcompactedlayerofwoodchips,mulch,orgravel.

Sandbagsorothererosioncontrolmeasureswillbeinstalledtopreventsiltrunofftopublicroadwaysfromsiteswithaslopegreaterthan1%.

Theidlingtimeofdieselpoweredconstructionequipmentwillbeminimizedto2minutes.

Theprojectwilldevelopaplandemonstratingthattheoffroadequipment(morethan50horsepower)tobeusedintheconstructionproject(i.e.,owned,leased,andsubcontractorvehicles)wouldachieveaprojectwidefleet‐average20%NOXreductionand45%PMreductioncomparedtothemostrecentARBfleetaverage.Acceptableoptionsforreducingemissionsincludetheuseoflatemodelengines,low‐emissiondieselproducts,alternativefuels,engineretrofittechnology,after‐treatmentproducts,add‐ondevicessuchasparticulatefilters,and/orotheroptionsassuchbecomeavailable.

UselowVOC(i.e.,ROG)coatingsbeyondthelocalrequirements(i.e.,Regulation8,Rule3:ArchitecturalCoatings).

Allconstructionequipment,dieseltrucks,andgeneratorswillbeequippedwithBACTforemissionreductionsofNOXandPM.

AllcontractorswilluseequipmentthatmeetsARB’smostrecentcertificationstandardforoffroadheavydutydieselengines.

ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2bwouldensurethatimpactsrelatedtofugitivedustemissionsintheSFBAABwouldbelessthansignificant.However,implementationofthesemeasureswouldnotreducetotalROGorNOXemissionstoaless‐than‐significantlevel(Table3.3‐11).ThisimpactoftotalROGandNOXemissionswouldbesignificantandunavoidable.

MitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2bwouldnotreducetheonroademissionsintheSJVABshowninTable3.3‐7,buttheseemissionswouldnotexceedSJVAPCD’ssignificancethresholdsandare,therefore,lessthansignificant.

ImpactAQ‐2a‐2:Violateanyairqualitystandardorcontributesubstantiallytoanexistingorprojectedairqualityviolation—programAlternative2:450MW(significantandunavoidable)

Construction Activities 

ConstructionofprogramAlternative2wouldoccuroveraperiodofapproximately4years.Itisestimatedthattherewouldbeapproximately184workdaysperyearthatwouldinvolvetheuseofheavyconstructionequipment.Constructionactivitiesintheprojectareawouldincludethesamephases,constructionequipment,andtrucktripsasAlternative1.ItwasassumedthatthedailyconstructionactivitiesforAlternative2wouldnotdifferfromthedailyconstructionactivitiesforAlternative1,althoughtheperiodofconstructionwouldbeslightlylongeroverall.

Itisanticipatedthatthemajorityofequipmentandmaterial‐relatedtrucktripswouldoriginateatthePortofStocktonandinthecityofTracyandthattheconstructionworker‐relatedcommutetripswouldoccurentirelywithintheSFBAAB.Theportionoftheequipment,material,andaggregatehaultripsthatwouldoriginateatthePortofStocktonandinthecityofTracywouldbegeneratedintheSJVAB,whichisunderSJVAPCD’sjurisdiction.Therefore,theheavy‐dutytrucktripexhaust

Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis

Air Quality 

 

APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐28 

October 2014ICF 00323.08

 

emissionsthatwouldbegeneratedintheSJVABhavebeenquantifiedandcomparedtoSJVAPCD’sannualsignificancethresholds(Table3.3‐7).

CriteriapollutantemissionsofROG,NOX,CO,SO2,PM10,andPM2.5fromconstructionequipmentwouldincrementallyaddtotheregionalatmosphericloadingofthesepollutantsduring constructionofprogramAlternative2.Themaximumdailyunmitigatedconstruction‐relatedexhaustemissionsthatwouldoccurintheSFBAABareanticipatedtobeexactlythesameasforalternative1andarepresentedinTable3.3‐8above.Thisisbecausedailyconstructionactivityisanticipatedtobethesameforbothalternatives.Theonlydifferenceinemissionsforthesealternativesistotalemissionsoverthecourseoftheentireconstructionperiod,sinceAlternative1willbeunderconstructionforapproximately50monthsandAlternative2willbeunderconstructionforapproximately54months.

Asdiscussedabove,constructionexhaustemissionswereestimatedusingCalEEMod(SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict2011),theEPAEmissionsFactors&AP42CompilationofAirPollutantEmissionFactorsdocument(U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency1995a,1995b,1995c),andtheARBEMFAC2011model(CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard2013c).Thistimeperiodinvolvestheoverlapofconstructionphasesincludingdecommissioningandfoundationremoval,roadconstruction,andturbinefoundationsandbatchplant,alongwithoffsitetrucktripsandoffsiteworkertrips.Othernon‐overlappingconstructionphasescontributetoaveragedailyandaverageannualemissions,buttheyarenotcountedascontributingtothemaximumdailyemissionsthatoccurwhenthephaseslistedaboveoverlap.

AsindicatedinTable3.3‐8above,maximumdailyunmitigatedexhaustemissionsofROGandNOXwouldexceedBAAQMD’ssignificancethreshold,resultinginasignificantimpact.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2bwouldreduceconstruction‐relatedexhaustemissions.AsindicatedinTable3.3‐7above,maximumannualunmitigatedexhaustemissionsofROGorNOXthatwouldbegeneratedintheSJVABwouldnotexceedSJVAPCD’ssignificancethreshold,resultinginalessthansignificantimpact.Asnotedabove,althoughtheSJVABisdownwindoftheprogramareaandsomeemissionsthatareemittedintheprogramareawithintheSFBAABwouldlikelydriftintotheSJVABduetotransport,theseemissionswerenotquantifiedduetothehighvariabilityinwindpatternsandlocalweatherandotherconditionsthatcontributetoemissiontransportanditwouldbespeculativetoquantifytheamountofproject‐relatedemissionsthatwouldtransportintotheSJVAB.Therefore,theseemissionswerenotestimatednorcomparedtotheSJVAPCD’sthresholds.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2bwould,however,reduceconstruction‐relatedexhaustemissionsintheSJVAB.

Inadditiontoexhaustemissions,emissionsoffugitivedustalsowouldbegeneratedbyproject‐relatedconstructionactivitiesassociatedwithgradingandearthdisturbance,travelonpavedandunpavedroads,andoperationoftheconcretebatchplantandrockcrusher.Asnotedabove,BAAQMD’snewapplicablerecommendedfugitivedustcontrolmeasures,whicharecontainedinMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2b,wouldbeimplementedtoreduceimpactsassociatedwithfugitivedustemissionstoaless‐than‐significantlevel.EventhoughtheBAAQMDGuidelinesdonotrequirethequantificationofconstruction‐relatedfugitivedustemissions,theseemissionswereestimatedforconstructionactivitiesforinformationalpurposesandarepresentedinTable3.3‐8.

ProjectproponentsalsowouldberequiredtoobtainpermitsfromBAAQMDfortheproposedconstruction‐relatedoperationsoftheconcretebatchplantandtherockcrusher.Fugitivesourcesassociatedwiththesefacilitieswouldincludethetransferofsandandaggregate,truckloading,

Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis

Air Quality 

 

APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐29 

October 2014ICF 00323.08

 

mixerloading,vehicletraffic,andwinderosionfromsandandaggregatestoragepiles.Permit stipulationswouldrequiretheuseofBACTs.Permitstipulationswouldlikelyfocusonincreasingmoisturecontentofthematerialsandmayrequiretheuseofwatersprays,enclosures,andbaghousedevices.ImplementationofBAAQMD’sBACTsforbatchplantsandcrushingequipmentwouldensurethatfugitivedustemissionsimpactsthatwouldbeassociatedwiththesefacilitieswouldbelessthansignificant.Asnotedabove,stationarysourceemissionsfromfuelcombustionatthebatchplantswerenotestimatedduetolackofdata.AlthoughtheseemissionswouldlikelybeminorafterBACTsareimplemented,theseemissionswouldcontributetothoseestimatedinTables3.3‐9through3.3‐11above.

Operational Activities 

Inadditiontoconstruction‐relatedemissions,theproposedprojectwouldalsoresultinoperational‐relatedemissionsassociatedwithturbinemaintenanceactivities,substationoperation,andworkertripstoandfromtheprojectarea.However,dailyandannualemissionsofcriteriapollutantsassociatedwithoperationalactivitiesareanticipatedtobeunchangedundertheproposedprojectandwouldnotbeconsideredtoresultinasignificantcontributiontoexistingairqualityviolations.Themaximumdailyunmitigatedoperation‐relatedemissionsthatwouldoccurintheSFBAABhavebeenestimatedandarepresentedinTable3.3‐9above;maximumannualunmitigatedoperation‐relatedemissionsarepresentedinTable3.3‐11above.

ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2bwouldensurethatimpactsrelatedtofugitivedustemissionsintheSFBAABwouldbelessthansignificant.However,implementationofthesemitigationmeasureswouldnotreducetotalNOXemissionstoaless‐than‐significancelevel(Table3.3‐11).ThisimpactoftotalNOXemissionswouldbesignificantandunavoidable.

MitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2bwouldnotreducetheonroademissionsshowninTable3.3‐7,buttheseemissionswouldnotexceedSJVAPCD’ssignificancethresholdandarethereforelessthansignificant.

MitigationMeasureAQ‐2a:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingapplicableBAAQMDBasicConstructionMitigationMeasures

MitigationMeasureAQ‐2b:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingmeasuresbasedonBAAQMD’sAdditionalConstructionMitigationMeasures

ImpactAQ‐2b:Violateanyairqualitystandardorcontributesubstantiallytoanexistingorprojectedairqualityviolation—GoldenHillsProject(significantandunavoidable)

Construction Activities 

ConstructionoftheGoldenHillsProjectwouldoccuroveraperiodofapproximately9months.Itisestimatedthattherewouldbeapproximately184workdaysthatwouldinvolvetheuseofheavyconstructionequipment.Constructionactivitiesintheprojectareawouldincludethesamephases,constructionequipment,andtrucktripsastheprogram.

Itisanticipatedthatthemajorityofequipmentandmaterial‐relatedtrucktripswouldoriginateatthePortofStocktonandinthecityofTracyandthattheconstructionworker‐relatedcommutetripswouldoccurentirelywithintheSFBAAB.Theportionoftheequipment,material,andaggregatehaul

Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis

Air Quality 

 

APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐30 

October 2014ICF 00323.08

 

tripsthatwouldoriginateatthePortofStocktonandinthecityofTracywouldbegeneratedintheSJVAB,whichisunderSJVAPCD’sjurisdiction.Therefore,theheavy‐dutytrucktripexhaustemissionsthatwouldbegeneratedintheSJVABhavebeenquantifiedandcomparedtoSJVAPCD’sannualsignificancethresholds(Table3.3‐12).

Table 3.3‐12. Golden Hills Construction Exhaust and Fugitive Dust Emissions within the SJVAB— Maximum Daily Unmitigated Emissions 

ConstructionActivity

EstimatedMaximumAnnualUnmitigatedEmissions(tons/year)

ROG NOX CO SO2PM10Total

PM2.5Total

Offsitetrucktrips 0.25 8.58 1.32 0.01 0.28 0.22

Totalemissions 0.25 8.58 1.32 0.01 0.28 0.22

SJVAPCDsignificancethreshold 10 10 NA NA 15 15

Significantimpact? No No No No No No

CriteriapollutantemissionsofROG,NOX,CO,SO2,PM10,andPM2.5fromconstructionequipmentwouldincrementallyaddtotheregionalatmosphericloadingofthesepollutantsduring constructionoftheGoldenHillsProject.Themaximumdailyunmitigatedconstruction‐relatedexhaustemissionsthatwouldoccurintheSFBAABhavebeenestimatedandarepresentedinTable3.3‐13.Asdiscussedabove,constructionexhaustemissionswereestimatedusingCalEEMod(SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict2011),theEPAEmissionsFactors&AP42CompilationofAirPollutantEmissionFactorsdocument(U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency1995a,1995b,1995c),andtheARBEMFAC2011model(CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard2013c).Thistimeperiodinvolvestheoverlapofconstructionphasesincludingdecommissioningandfoundationremoval,roadconstruction,andturbinefoundationsandbatchplant,alongwithoffsitetrucktripsandoffsiteworkertrips.Othernon‐overlappingconstructionphasescontributetoaveragedailyandaverageannualemissions,buttheyarenotcountedascontributingtothemaximumdailyemissionsthatoccurwhenthephaseslistedaboveoverlap.

Table 3.3‐13. Golden Hills Construction Exhaust and Fugitive Dust Emissionswithin the SFBAAB—Maximum Daily Unmitigated Emissions 

ConstructionActivity

EstimatedMaximumDailyUnmitigatedEmissions(pounds/day)

ROG NOX CO SO2PM10Exhaust

PM10Dust

PM2.5Exhaust

PM2.5Dust

Decommissioningandfoundationremoval

15.05 126.17 46.89 0.17 4.40 6.36 4.36 0.29

Laydown,substationsandswitchyards

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Roadconstruction 14.16 119.36 52.40 0.16 4.25 40.96 4.20 12.96

Turbinefoundationsandbatchplanta

23.63 200.14 85.56 0.28 7.02 21.96 6.92 17.83

Turbinedeliveryandinstallation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Utilitycollectorlineinstallation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Restorationandcleanup 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis

Air Quality 

 

APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐31 

October 2014ICF 00323.08

 

ConstructionActivity EstimatedMaximumDailyUnmitigatedEmissions(pounds/day)

Offsitetrucktrips 5.41 110.45 28.15 0.34 2.77 1.06 2.55 0.39

Offsiteworkertrips  0.29 1.32 9.58 0.11 0.01 0.23 0.01 0.09

Totalemissions 58.53 557.44 222.59 1.07 18.45 70.58 18.04 31.55

BAAQMDsignificancethreshold 54 54 NA NA 82 NA 54 NA

Significantimpact? Yes Yes No No No No No No

Note: Constructionactivitywithzeroemissionsmeansthatthisactivityisnotanticipatedtooccurduringthetimeperiodproducingthemaximumdailyemissionsforconstruction.

a Includesconstructionactivitiesalongwithfugitivedustemissionsfromtheconcretebatchplants.

AsindicatedinTable3.3‐13,maximumdailyunmitigatedexhaustemissionsofROGandNOXwouldexceedBAAQMD’ssignificancethreshold,resultinginasignificantimpact.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2bwouldreduceconstruction‐relatedexhaustemissions.AsindicatedinTable3.3‐12,maximumannualunmitigatedexhaustemissionsofROGorNOXthatwouldbegeneratedintheSJVABwouldnotexceedSJVAPCD’ssignificancethreshold,resultinginaless‐than‐significantimpact.Asnotedabove,althoughtheSJVABisdownwindoftheprojectsiteandsomeemissionsthatareemittedattheprojectsitewithintheSFBAABwouldlikelydriftintotheSJVABduetotransport,theseemissionswerenotquantifiedduetothehighvariabilityinwindpatternsandlocalweatherandotherconditionsthatcontributetoemissiontransportanditwouldbespeculativetoquantifytheamountofproject‐relatedemissionsthatwouldtransportintotheSJVAB.Therefore,theseemissionswerenotestimatednorcomparedtotheSJVAPCD’sthresholds.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2bwould,however,reduceconstruction‐relatedexhaustemissionsintheSJVAB.

Inadditiontoexhaustemissions,emissionsoffugitivedustalsowouldbegeneratedbyproject‐relatedconstructionactivitiesassociatedwithgradingandearthdisturbance,travelonpavedandunpavedroads,andoperationoftheconcretebatchplantandrockcrusher.Asnotedabove,BAAQMD’snewapplicablerecommendedfugitivedustcontrolmeasures,whicharecontainedinMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2b,wouldbeimplementedtoreduceimpactsassociatedwithfugitivedustemissionstoaless‐than‐significantlevel.EventhoughtheBAAQMDGuidelinesdonotrequirethequantificationofconstruction‐relatedfugitivedustemissions,theseemissionswereestimatedforconstructionactivitiesforinformationalpurposesandarepresentedinTable3.3‐13.

ProjectproponentsalsowouldberequiredtoobtainpermitsfromBAAQMDfortheproposedconstruction‐relatedoperationsoftheconcretebatchplantandtherockcrusher.Fugitivesourcesassociatedwiththesefacilitieswouldincludethetransferofsandandaggregate,truckloading,mixerloading,vehicletraffic,andwinderosionfromsandandaggregatestoragepiles.Permit stipulationswouldrequiretheuseofBACTs.Permitstipulationswouldlikelyfocusonincreasingmoisturecontentofthematerialsandmayrequiretheuseofwatersprays,enclosures,andbaghousedevices.ImplementationofBAAQMD’sBACTsforbatchplantsandcrushingequipmentwouldensurethatfugitivedustemissionsimpactsthatwouldbeassociatedwiththesefacilitieswouldbelessthansignificant.Asnotedabove,stationarysourceemissionsfromfuelcombustionatthebatchplantswerenotestimatedduetolackofdata.AlthoughtheseemissionswouldlikelybeminorafterBACTsareimplemented,theseemissionswouldcontributetothoseestimatedinTables3.3‐14through3.3‐16.

Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis

Air Quality 

 

APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐32 

October 2014ICF 00323.08

 

Table 3.3‐14. Golden Hills Operational Exhaust and Fugitive Dust Emissions for the SFBAAB—Maximum Daily Unmitigated Emissions 

OperationalActivity

EstimatedMaximumDailyUnmitigatedEmissions(pounds/day)

ROG NOX CO SO2PM10Exhaust

PM10Dust

PM2.5Exhaust

PM2.5Dust

Offsiteworkertrips 0.02 0.12 0.85 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.01

Maintenance/operation  2.99 24.79 11.07 0.03 1.02 0.65 1.01 0.03

Totalemissions 3.02 24.91 11.92 0.04 1.02 0.67 1.01 0.04

BAAQMDsignificancethreshold 54 54 NA NA 82 NA 54 NA

Significantimpact? No No No No No No No No

Table 3.3‐15. Golden Hills Operational Exhaust and Fugitive Dust Emissions for the SFBAAB— Maximum Annual Unmitigated Emissions 

OperationalActivity

EstimatedMaximumAnnualUnmitigatedEmissions(tons/day)

ROG NOX CO SO2PM10Exhaust

PM10Dust

PM2.5Exhaust

PM2.5Dust

Offsiteworkertrips 0.00 0.02 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Maintenance/operation  0.07 0.52 0.37 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.00

Totalemissions 0.07 0.54 0.48 0.00 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.00

BAAQMDsignificancethreshold 10 10 NA NA 15 NA 10 NA

Significantimpact? No No No No No No No No

Table 3.3‐16. Golden Hills Program Construction Exhaust and Fugitive Dust Emissions within the SFBAAB—Maximum Daily Mitigated Emissions 

ConstructionActivity

EstimatedMaximumDailyMitigatedEmissions(pounds/day)

ROG NOX CO SO2PM10Exhaust

PM10Dust

PM2.5Exhaust

PM2.5Dust

Decommissioningandfoundationremoval

15.05 100.93 46.89 0.17 2.42 2.86 2.40 0.13

Laydown,substationsandswitchyards

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Roadconstruction 14.16 95.49 52.40 0.16 2.34 18.43 2.31 5.83

Turbinefoundationsandbatchplanta

23.63 160.11 85.56 0.28 3.86 9.88 3.80 8.02

Turbinedeliveryandinstallation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Utilitycollectorlineinstallation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Restorationandcleanup 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Offsitetrucktrips 5.41 110.45 28.15 0.34 2.77 1.06 2.55 0.39

Offsiteworkertrips  0.29 1.32 9.58 0.11 0.01 0.23 0.01 0.09

Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis

Air Quality 

 

APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐33 

October 2014ICF 00323.08

 

ConstructionActivity

EstimatedMaximumDailyMitigatedEmissions(pounds/day)

ROG NOX CO SO2PM10Exhaust

PM10Dust

PM2.5Exhaust

PM2.5Dust

Totalemissions 58.53 468.31 222.59 1.07 11.40 32.47 11.07 14.46

BAAQMDsignificancethreshold 54 54 NA NA 82 NA 54 NA

Significantimpact? Yes Yes No No No No No No

Note: Constructionactivitywithzeroemissionsmeansthatthisactivityisnotanticipatedtooccurduringthetimeperiodproducingthemaximumdailyemissionsforconstruction.

a Includesconstructionactivitiesalongwithfugitivedustemissionsfromtheconcretebatchplants

Operational Activities 

Inadditiontoconstruction‐relatedemissions,theproposedprojectwouldalsoresultinoperational‐relatedemissionsassociatedwithturbinemaintenanceactivities,substationoperation,andworkertripstoandfromtheprojectarea.However,dailyandannualemissionsofcriteriapollutantsassociatedwithoperationalactivitiesareanticipatedtobeunchangedundertheproposedprojectandwouldnotbeconsideredtoresultinasignificantcontributiontoexistingairqualityviolations.Themaximumdailyunmitigatedoperation‐relatedemissionsthatwouldoccurintheSFBAABhavebeenestimatedandarepresentedinTable3.3‐14;maximumannualunmitigatedoperation‐relatedemissionsarepresentedinTable3.3‐15.

ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2bwouldensurethatimpactsrelatedtofugitivedustemissionsintheSFBAABwouldbelessthansignificant.However,implementationofthesemitigationmeasureswouldnotreducetotalNOXemissionstoaless‐than‐significancelevel(Table3.3‐16).ThisimpactoftotalNOXemissionswouldbesignificantandunavoidable.

MitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2bwouldnotreducetheonroademissionsshowninTable3.3‐12,buttheseemissionswouldnotexceedSJVAPCD’ssignificancethresholdandarethereforelessthansignificant.

MitigationMeasureAQ‐2a:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingapplicableBAAQMDBasicConstructionMitigationMeasures

MitigationMeasureAQ‐2b:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingmeasuresbasedonBAAQMD’sAdditionalConstructionMitigationMeasures

ImpactAQ‐2c:Violateanyairqualitystandardorcontributesubstantiallytoanexistingorprojectedairqualityviolation—PattersonPassProject(significantandunavoidable)

Construction Activities 

ConstructionofthePattersonPassProjectwouldoccuroveraperiodofapproximately9months.Itisestimatedthattherewouldbeapproximately184workdaysthatwouldinvolvetheuseofheavyconstructionequipment.Constructionactivitiesintheprojectareawouldincludethesamephases,constructionequipment,andtrucktripsastheprogram.

Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis

Air Quality 

 

APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐34 

October 2014ICF 00323.08

 

Itisanticipatedthatthemajorityofequipmentandmaterial‐relatedtrucktripswouldoriginateatthePortofStocktonandinthecityofTracyandthattheconstructionworker‐relatedcommutetripswouldoccurentirelywithintheSFBAAB.Theportionoftheequipment,material,andaggregatehaultripsthatwouldoriginateatthePortofStocktonandinthecityofTracywouldbegeneratedintheSJVAB,whichisunderSJVAPCD’sjurisdiction.Therefore,theheavy‐dutytrucktripexhaustemissionsthatwouldbegeneratedintheSJVABhavebeenquantifiedandcomparedtoSJVAPCD’sannualsignificancethresholds(Table3.3‐17).

Table 3.3‐17. Patterson Pass Construction Exhaust and Fugitive Dust Emissions within the SJVAB—Maximum Daily Unmitigated Emissions 

ConstructionActivity

EstimatedMaximumAnnualUnmitigatedEmissions(tons/year)

ROG NOX CO SO2PM10Total

PM2.5Total

Offsitetrucktrips 0.06 1.92 0.30 0.00 0.06 0.05

Totalemissions 0.06 1.92 0.30 0.00 0.06 0.05

SJVAPCDsignificancethreshold 10 10 NA NA 15 15

Significantimpact? No No No No No No

CriteriapollutantemissionsofROG,NOX,CO,SO2,PM10,andPM2.5fromconstructionequipmentwouldincrementallyaddtotheregionalatmosphericloadingofthesepollutantsduring constructionofthePattersonPassProject.Themaximumdailyunmitigatedconstruction‐relatedexhaustemissionsthatwouldoccurintheSFBAABhavebeenestimatedandarepresentedinTable3.3‐18.Asdiscussedabove,constructionexhaustemissionswereestimatedusingCalEEMod(SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict2011),theEPAEmissionsFactors&AP42CompilationofAirPollutantEmissionFactorsdocument(U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency1995a,1995b,1995c),andtheARBEMFAC2011model(CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard2013c).Thistimeperiodinvolvestheoverlapofconstructionphasesincludingdecommissioningandfoundationremoval,roadconstruction,andturbinefoundationsandbatchplant,alongwithoffsitetrucktripsandoffsiteworkertrips.Othernon‐overlappingconstructionphasescontributetoaveragedailyandaverageannualemissions,buttheyarenotcountedascontributingtothemaximumdailyemissionsthatoccurwhenthephaseslistedaboveoverlap.

AsindicatedinTable3.3‐18,maximumdailyunmitigatedexhaustemissionsofNOXwouldexceedBAAQMD’ssignificancethreshold,resultinginasignificantimpact.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2bwouldreduceconstruction‐relatedexhaustemissions.AsindicatedinTable3.3‐17,maximumannualunmitigatedexhaustemissionsofROGorNOXthatwouldbegeneratedintheSJVABwouldnotexceedSJVAPCD’ssignificancethresholds,resultinginaless‐than‐significantimpact.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2bwould,however,reduceconstruction‐relatedexhaustemissionsintheSJVAB.Asnotedabove,althoughtheSJVABisdownwindoftheprojectsiteandsomeemissionsthatareemittedattheprojectsitewithintheSFBAABmaydriftintotheSJVABduetotransport,theseemissionswerenotquantifiedduetothehighvariabilityinwindpatternsandlocalweatherandotherconditionsthatcontributetoemissiontransportanditwouldbespeculativetoquantifytheamountofproject‐relatedemissionsthatwouldtransportintotheSJVAB.Therefore,theseemissionswerenotestimatednorcomparedtotheSJVAPCD’sthresholds.

Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis

Air Quality 

 

APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐35 

October 2014ICF 00323.08

 

Table 3.3‐18. Patterson Pass Construction Exhaust and Fugitive Dust Emissions within the SFBAAB—Maximum Daily Unmitigated Emissions 

ConstructionActivity

EstimatedMaximumDailyUnmitigatedEmissions(pounds/day)

ROG NOX CO SO2PM10Exhaust

PM10Dust

PM2.5Exhaust

PM2.5Dust

Decommissioningandfoundationremoval

3.37 28.26 10.50 0.04 0.99 1.42 0.98 0.06

Laydown,substationsandswitchyards

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Roadconstruction 3.17 26.74 11.74 0.04 0.95 9.18 0.94 2.90

Turbinefoundationsandbatchplanta

5.29 44.83 19.16 0.06 1.57 4.92 1.55 3.99

Turbinedeliveryandinstallation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Utilitycollectorlineinstallation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Restorationandcleanup 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Offsitetrucktrips 1.21 24.74 6.31 0.08 0.62 0.24 0.57 0.09

Offsiteworkertrips  0.06 0.30 2.15 0.02 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.02

Totalemissions 13.11 124.86 49.86 0.24 4.13 15.81 4.04 7.07

BAAQMDsignificancethreshold 54 54 NA NA 82 NA 54 NA

Significantimpact? No Yes No No No No No No

Note: Constructionactivitywithzeroemissionsmeansthatthisactivityisnotanticipatedtooccurduringthetimeperiodproducingthemaximumdailyemissionsforconstruction.

a Includesconstructionactivitiesalongwithfugitivedustemissionsfromtheconcretebatchplants.

Inadditiontoexhaustemissions,emissionsoffugitivedustalsowouldbegeneratedbyproject‐relatedconstructionactivitiesassociatedwithgradingandearthdisturbance,travelonpavedandunpavedroads,andoperationoftheconcretebatchplantandrockcrusher.Asnotedabove,BAAQMD’snewapplicablerecommendedfugitivedustcontrolmeasures,whicharecontainedinMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2b,wouldbeimplementedtoreduceimpactsassociatedwithfugitivedustemissionstoaless‐than‐significantlevel.EventhoughtheBAAQMDGuidelinesdonotrequirethequantificationofconstruction‐relatedfugitivedustemissions,theseemissionswereestimatedforconstructionactivitiesforinformationalpurposesandarepresentedinTable3.3‐18.

TheprojectproponentalsowouldberequiredtoobtainpermitsfromBAAQMDfortheproposedconstruction‐relatedoperationsoftheconcretebatchplantandtherockcrusher.Fugitivesourcesassociatedwiththesefacilitieswouldincludethetransferofsandandaggregate,truckloading,mixerloading,vehicletraffic,andwinderosionfromsandandaggregatestoragepiles.Permit stipulationswouldrequiretheuseofBACTs.Permitstipulationswouldlikelyfocusonincreasingmoisturecontentofthematerialsandmayrequiretheuseofwatersprays,enclosures,andbaghousedevices.ImplementationofBAAQMD’sBACTsforbatchplantsandcrushingequipmentwouldensurethatfugitivedustemissionsimpactsthatwouldbeassociatedwiththesefacilitieswouldbelessthansignificant.Asnotedabove,stationarysourceemissionsfromfuelcombustionatthebatchplantswerenotestimatedduetolackofdata.Althoughtheseemissionswouldlikelybe

Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis

Air Quality 

 

APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐36 

October 2014ICF 00323.08

 

minorafterBACTsareimplemented,theseemissionswouldcontributetothoseestimatedinTables3.3‐19through3.3‐21.

Table 3.3‐19. Patterson Pass Operational Exhaust and Fugitive Dust Emissions within the SFBAAB—Maximum Daily Unmitigated Emissions 

OperationalActivity

EstimatedMaximumDailyUnmitigatedEmissions(pounds/day)

ROG NOX CO SO2PM10Exhaust

PM10Dust

PM2.5Exhaust

PM2.5Dust

Offsiteworkertrips 0.01 0.03 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00

Maintenance/operation  0.67 5.55 2.48 0.01 0.23 0.14 0.23 0.01

Totalemissions 0.68 5.58 2.67 0.01 0.23 0.15 0.23 0.01

BAAQMDsignificancethreshold 54 54 NA NA 82 NA 54 NA

Significantimpact? No No No No No No No No

Table 3.3‐20. Patterson Pass Operational Exhaust and Fugitive Dust Emissions within the SFBAAB—Maximum Annual Unmitigated Emissions 

OperationalActivity

EstimatedMaximumAnnualUnmitigatedEmissions(tons/day)

ROG NOX CO SO2PM10Exhaust

PM10Dust

PM2.5Exhaust

PM2.5Dust

Offsiteworkertrips 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Maintenance/operation  0.02 0.12 0.08 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00

Totalemissions 0.02 0.12 0.11 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00

BAAQMDsignificancethreshold 10 10 NA NA 15 NA 10 NA

Significantimpact? No No No No No No No No

Table 3.3‐21. Patterson Pass Construction Exhaust and Fugitive Dust Emissions within the SFBAAB—Maximum Daily Mitigated Emissions 

ConstructionActivity

EstimatedMaximumDailyMitigatedEmissions(pounds/day)

ROG NOX CO SO2PM10Exhaust

PM10Dust

PM2.5Exhaust

PM2.5Dust

Decommissioningandfoundationremoval

3.37 22.61 10.50 0.04 0.54 0.64 0.54 0.03

Laydown,substationsandswitchyards

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Roadconstruction 3.17 21.39 11.74 0.04 0.52 4.13 0.52 1.31

Turbinefoundationsandbatchplanta

5.29 35.86 19.16 0.06 0.86 2.21 0.85 1.80

Turbinedeliveryandinstallation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Utilitycollectorlineinstallation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Restorationandcleanup 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Offsitetrucktrips 1.21 24.74 6.31 0.08 0.62 0.24 0.57 0.09

Offsiteworkertrips  0.06 0.30 2.15 0.02 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.02

Totalemissions 13.11 104.89 49.86 0.24 2.55 7.27 2.48 3.24

Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis

Air Quality 

 

APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐37 

October 2014ICF 00323.08

 

ConstructionActivity EstimatedMaximumDailyMitigatedEmissions(pounds/day)

BAAQMDsignificancethreshold 54 54 NA NA 82 NA 54 NA

Significantimpact? No Yes No No No No No No

Note: Constructionactivitywithzeroemissionsmeansthatthisactivityisnotanticipatedtooccurduringthetimeperiodproducingthemaximumdailyemissionsforconstruction.

a Includesconstructionactivitiesalongwithfugitivedustemissionsfromtheconcretebatchplants

Operational Activities 

Inadditiontoconstruction‐relatedemissions,theproposedprojectwouldalsoresultinoperational‐relatedemissionsassociatedwithturbinemaintenanceactivities,substationoperation,andworkertripstoandfromtheprojectarea.However,dailyandannualemissionsofcriteriapollutantsassociatedwithoperationalactivitiesareanticipatedtobeunchangedundertheproposedprojectandwouldnotbeconsideredtoresultinasignificantcontributiontoexistingairqualityviolations.Themaximumdailyunmitigatedoperation‐relatedemissionsthatwouldoccurintheSFBAABhavebeenestimatedandarepresentedinTable3.3‐19;maximumannualunmitigatedoperation‐relatedemissionsarepresentedinTable3.3‐20.

ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2bwouldensurethatimpactsrelatedtofugitivedustemissionsintheSFBAABwouldbelessthansignificant.However,implementationofthesemeasureswouldnotreducetotalNOXemissionstoaless‐than‐significancelevel(Table3.3‐21).TheimpactoftotalNOXemissionswouldbesignificantandunavoidable.

MitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2bwouldnotreducetheonroademissionsshowninTable3.3‐17,buttheseemissionswouldnotexceedSJVAPCD’ssignificancethresholdandare,therefore,lessthansignificant.

MitigationMeasureAQ‐2a:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingapplicableBAAQMDBasicConstructionMitigationMeasures

MitigationMeasureAQ‐2b:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingmeasuresbasedonBAAQMD’sAdditionalConstructionMitigationMeasures

ImpactAQ‐3a‐1:Resultinacumulativelyconsiderablenetincreaseofanycriteriapollutantforwhichtheprojectregionisanonattainmentareaforanapplicablefederalorstateambientairqualitystandard(includingreleasingemissionsthatexceedquantitativethresholdsforozoneprecursors)—programAlternative1:417MW(significantandunavoidableforconstructionandlessthansignificantforoperation)

OperationofprogramAlternative1wouldnotresultinnewpermanentstationarysourcesofcriteriapollutants,norwoulditincreasecriteriapollutantemissionsfromanyexistingstationarysources.Dependingontheconstructionactivitiesunderwayduringanygivenmonth,from40to150workerswouldbeatthesiteduringconstruction.Nonewpermanentworkerswouldbeemployedundertheprogram.Drive‐byinspectionsandscheduledwindturbinemaintenancewouldcontinuetooccuronadaily,weekly,ormonthlybasisandwouldbeconductedbyexistingtechniciansandoperationspersonnel.Theseactivitieswouldcontinuetobeperformedpertherequirementsoftheequipmentspecificationsandstandardindustrypractice.Dailyemissionsofcriteriapollutants

Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis

Air Quality 

 

APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐38 

October 2014ICF 00323.08

 

associatedwiththeseactivitiesareanticipatedtobeunchangedundertheprogramandwouldnotbeconsideredtoresultinasignificantcontributiontoexistingairqualityviolations.

However,asnotedabove,projectsthatwouldresultinanincreaseinROG,NOX,PM10,orPM2.5ofmorethantheirrespectiveproject‐leveldailymassthresholdsindicatedinTable3.3‐5wouldalsobeconsideredtocontributeconsiderablytoasignificantcumulativeimpact.BecauseconstructionemissionsofROGandNOXforAlternative1aregreaterthantheBAAQMDthresholdsaftertheimplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2b,(Table3.3‐11),constructionimpactsaresignificantandunavoidable.

MitigationMeasureAQ‐2a:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingapplicableBAAQMDBasicConstructionMitigationMeasures

MitigationMeasureAQ‐2b:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingmeasuresbasedonBAAQMD’sAdditionalConstructionMitigationMeasures

ImpactAQ‐3a‐2:Resultinacumulativelyconsiderablenetincreaseofanycriteriapollutantforwhichtheprojectregionisanonattainmentareaforanapplicablefederalorstateambientairqualitystandard(includingreleasingemissionsthatexceedquantitativethresholdsforozoneprecursors)—programAlternative2:450MW(significantandunavoidableforconstructionandlessthansignificantforoperation)

OperationofprogramAlternative2wouldnotresultinnewpermanentstationarysourcesofcriteriapollutants,norwoulditincreasecriteriapollutantemissionsfromanyexistingstationarysources.Nonewpermanentworkerswouldbeemployedundertheproposedproject.Drive‐byinspectionsandscheduledwindturbinemaintenancewouldcontinuetooccuronadaily,weekly,ormonthlybasisandwouldbeconductedbyexistingtechniciansandoperationspersonnel.Theseactivitieswouldcontinuetobeperformedpertherequirementsoftheequipmentspecificationsandstandardindustrypractice.Dailyemissionsofcriteriapollutantsassociatedwiththeseactivitiesareanticipatedtobeunchangedundertheproposedprojectandwouldnotbeconsideredtoresultinasignificantcontributiontoexistingairqualityviolations.

BecauseconstructionemissionsofROGandNOXforAlternative2wouldbegreaterthantheBAAQMDthresholdsaftertheimplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2b,(Table3.3‐11),constructionimpactswouldbesignificantandunavoidable.

MitigationMeasureAQ‐2a:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingapplicableBAAQMDBasicConstructionMitigationMeasures

MitigationMeasureAQ‐2b:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingmeasuresbasedonBAAQMD’sAdditionalConstructionMitigationMeasures

Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis

Air Quality 

 

APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐39 

October 2014ICF 00323.08

 

ImpactAQ‐3b:Resultinacumulativelyconsiderablenetincreaseofanycriteriapollutantforwhichtheprojectregionisanonattainmentareaforanapplicablefederalorstateambientairqualitystandard(includingreleasingemissionsthatexceedquantitativethresholdsforozoneprecursors)—GoldenHillsProject(significantandunavoidableforconstructionandlessthansignificantforoperation)

OperationoftheGoldenHillsProjectwouldnotresultinnewpermanentstationarysourcesofcriteriapollutants,norwoulditincreasecriteriapollutantemissionsfromanyexistingstationarysources.Nonewpermanentworkerswouldbeemployedundertheproposedproject.Drive‐byinspectionsandscheduledwindturbinemaintenancewouldcontinuetooccuronadaily,weekly,ormonthlybasisandwouldbeconductedbyexistingtechniciansandoperationspersonnel.Theseactivitieswouldcontinuetobeperformedpertherequirementsoftheequipmentspecificationsandstandardindustrypractice.Dailyemissionsofcriteriapollutantsassociatedwiththeseactivitiesareanticipatedtobeunchangedundertheproposedprojectandwouldnotbeconsideredtoresultinasignificantcontributiontoexistingairqualityviolations.

BecauseconstructionemissionsofNOXfortheGoldenHillsProjectwouldbegreaterthantheBAAQMDthresholdsaftertheimplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2b,(Table3.3‐16),constructionimpactswouldbesignificantandunavoidable.

MitigationMeasureAQ‐2a:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingapplicableBAAQMDBasicConstructionMitigationMeasures

MitigationMeasureAQ‐2b:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingmeasuresbasedonBAAQMD’sAdditionalConstructionMitigationMeasures

ImpactAQ‐3c:Resultinacumulativelyconsiderablenetincreaseofanycriteriapollutantforwhichtheprojectregionisanonattainmentareaforanapplicablefederalorstateambientairqualitystandard(includingreleasingemissionsthatexceedquantitativethresholdsforozoneprecursors)—PattersonPassProject(significantandunavoidableforconstructionandlessthansignificantforoperation)

OperationofthePattersonPassProjectwouldnotresultinnewpermanentstationarysourcesofcriteriapollutants,norwoulditincreasecriteriapollutantemissionsfromanyexistingstationarysources.Nonewpermanentworkerswouldbeemployedundertheproposedproject.Drive‐byinspectionsandscheduledwindturbinemaintenancewouldcontinuetooccuronadaily,weekly,ormonthlybasisandwouldbeconductedbyexistingtechniciansandoperationspersonnel.Theseactivitieswouldcontinuetobeperformedpertherequirementsoftheequipmentspecificationsandstandardindustrypractice.Dailyemissionsofcriteriapollutantsassociatedwiththeseactivitiesareanticipatedtobeunchangedundertheproposedprojectandwouldnotbeconsideredtoresultinasignificantcontributiontoexistingairqualityviolations.

BecauseconstructionemissionsofNOXforthePattersonPassProjectwouldbegreaterthantheBAAQMDthresholdsaftertheimplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2b,(Table3.3‐21),constructionimpactswouldbesignificantandunavoidable.

MitigationMeasureAQ‐2a:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingapplicableBAAQMDBasicConstructionMitigationMeasures

Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis

Air Quality 

 

APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐40 

October 2014ICF 00323.08

 

MitigationMeasureAQ‐2b:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingmeasuresbasedonBAAQMD’sAdditionalConstructionMitigationMeasures

ImpactAQ‐4a‐1:Exposesensitivereceptorstosubstantialpollutantconcentrations—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)

Long‐termoperationsassociatedwiththeprogramwouldresultinnonewemissions.Constructionactivitieswouldgenerateairpollutantemissions,includingequipmentexhaustemissionsandsuspendedandinhalablePM.However,constructionactivitieswouldoccuroverarelativelyshortperiodofapproximately4years,andassociatedemissionswouldbespatiallydispersedovertheapproximately49,202‐acreprogramarea.Inaddition,theclosestsensitivereceptorstotheprogramareaareacommunityofsingle‐familyresidencesinthecityofLivermorelocatedapproximately4,500feettothewestoftheprogramareaboundaryandtheMountainHousecommunityofsingle‐familyresidences,threeelementaryschoolschildcarefacilities,andparksandopenspaceareas,locatedapproximately5,000feettotheeastoftheprogramareaboundary.TheemissionsmodelingshowsthatamajorityofDPMexhaustemissions(PM10andPM2.5)areassociatedwithturbinefoundationsandbatchplantandoffsitetrucktrips.Thecementbatchplants,whichrepresentastationarysourceofemissions,wouldnotlikelybelocatedattheprogramareaboundary.Assuch,thedistancefromthebatchplantstothenearestsensitivereceptorswouldlikelybegreaterthan4,500feet.Regardingoffsitetrucktrips,thesewouldbetransitoryandwouldoccuronmultipleroadsoverawidespreadarea,therebyhelpingtodispersetoxicpollutantsandminimizeexposure.Therefore,program‐relatedconstructionemissionswouldbesufficientlydilutedatthenearestsensitivereceptorlocations.

WithimplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2b,whichwouldreducebothcriteriapollutantsandtoxicaircontaminantemissionsfromconstructionequipmentandreducethepotentialhealthriskstosensitivereceptors,thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.

MitigationMeasureAQ‐2a:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingapplicableBAAQMDBasicConstructionMitigationMeasures

MitigationMeasureAQ‐2b:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingmeasuresbasedonBAAQMD’sAdditionalConstructionMitigationMeasures

ImpactAQ‐4a‐2:Exposesensitivereceptorstosubstantialpollutantconcentrations—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)

TheimpactofprogramAlternative2isthesameasforprogramAlternative1.Constructionactivitieswouldoccuroverarelativelyshortperiodofapproximately4years,andassociatedemissionswouldbespatiallydispersedovertheapproximately49,202‐acreprojectarea.WithimplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2b,whichwouldreducebothcriteriapollutantsandtoxicaircontaminantemissionsfromconstructionequipmentandreducethepotentialhealthriskstosensitivereceptors,thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.

MitigationMeasureAQ‐2a:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingapplicableBAAQMDBasicConstructionMitigationMeasures

Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis

Air Quality 

 

APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐41 

October 2014ICF 00323.08

 

MitigationMeasureAQ‐2b:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingmeasuresbasedonBAAQMD’sAdditionalConstructionMitigationMeasures

ImpactAQ‐4b:Exposesensitivereceptorstosubstantialpollutantconcentrations—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)

TheimpactfortheGoldenHillsProjectisthesameasfortheprogram.Constructionactivitiesareanticipatedtolastforonly10months,andassociatedemissionswouldbespatiallydispersedovertheapproximately4,584‐acreprojectarea.WithimplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2b,whichwouldreducebothcriteriapollutantsandtoxicaircontaminantemissionsfromconstructionequipmentandreducethepotentialhealthriskstosensitivereceptors,thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.

MitigationMeasureAQ‐2a:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingapplicableBAAQMDBasicConstructionMitigationMeasures

MitigationMeasureAQ‐2b:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingmeasuresbasedonBAAQMD’sAdditionalConstructionMitigationMeasures

ImpactAQ‐4c:Exposesensitivereceptorstosubstantialpollutantconcentrations—PattersonPassProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)

TheimpactforthePattersonPassProjectisthesameasfortheprogram.Constructionactivitiesareanticipatedtolastforonly10months,andassociatedemissionswouldbespatiallydispersedovertheapproximately945‐acreprojectarea.WithimplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2b,whichwouldreducebothcriteriapollutantsandtoxicaircontaminantemissionsfromconstructionequipmentandreducethepotentialhealthriskstosensitivereceptors,thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.

MitigationMeasureAQ‐2a:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingapplicableBAAQMDBasicConstructionMitigationMeasures

MitigationMeasureAQ‐2b:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingmeasuresbasedonBAAQMD’sAdditionalConstructionMitigationMeasures

ImpactAQ‐5a‐1:Createobjectionableodorsaffectingasubstantialnumberofpeople—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificant)

Typicalodorsourcesofconcernincludewastewatertreatmentplants,sanitarylandfills,transferstations,compostingfacilities,petroleumrefineries,asphaltbatchplants,chemicalmanufacturingfacilities,animalfeedlots,fiberglassmanufacturingfacilities,autobodyshops,andrenderingplants.Theprogramwouldresultinthedevelopmentofnewwindturbinegeneratorsthatwouldnotresultinobjectionableodors.Althoughprogramconstructionwouldinvolvetheuseofdieselequipmentandatemporarybatchplantthatcouldresultinthecreationofodors,theconstructionactivitieswouldbetemporary(approximately5years),spatiallydispersedoverthe49,202‐acreprogram

Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis

Air Quality 

 

APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐42 

October 2014ICF 00323.08

 

area,andwouldtakeplaceinareasthatarenotinthevicinityofsensitivereceptors.Therefore,theprogramwouldnotaffectasubstantialnumberofpeople.

Thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.Nomitigationisrequired.

ImpactAQ‐5a‐2:Createobjectionableodorsaffectingasubstantialnumberofpeople—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificant)

TheimpactforprogramAlternative2isthesameasforprogramAlternative1.Althoughprojectconstructionwouldinvolvetheuseofdieselequipmentandatemporarybatchplantthatcouldresultinthecreationofodors,theconstructionactivitieswouldbetemporary(approximately4years),spatiallydispersedoverthe49,202‐acreprojectarea,andwouldtakeplaceinareasthatarenotinthevicinityofsensitivereceptors.Therefore,theproposedprojectwouldnotaffectasubstantialnumberofpeople.

Thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.Nomitigationisrequired.

ImpactAQ‐5b:Createobjectionableodorsaffectingasubstantialnumberofpeople—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificant)

TheimpactfortheGoldenHillsProjectisthesameasfortheprogram.Althoughprojectconstructionwouldinvolvetheuseofdieselequipmentandatemporarybatchplantthatcouldresultinthecreationofodors,theconstructionactivitieswouldbetemporary(approximately10months),spatiallydispersedoverthe4,584‐acreprojectarea,andwouldtakeplaceinareasthatarenotinthevicinityofsensitivereceptors.Therefore,theproposedprojectwouldnotaffectasubstantialnumberofpeople.

Thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.Nomitigationisrequired.

ImpactAQ‐5c:Createobjectionableodorsaffectingasubstantialnumberofpeople—PattersonPassProject(lessthansignificant)

TheimpactforthePattersonPassProjectisthesameasfortheprogram.Althoughprojectconstructionwouldinvolvetheuseofdieselequipmentandatemporarybatchplantthatcouldresultinthecreationofodors,theconstructionactivitieswouldbetemporary(approximately10months),spatiallydispersedoverthe945‐acreprojectarea,andwouldtakeplaceinareasthatarenotinthevicinityofsensitivereceptors.Therefore,theproposedprojectwouldnotaffectasubstantialnumberofpeople.

Thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.Nomitigationisrequired.

Cumulative Analysis 

CumulativeimpactsrelatedtoairqualityareaddressedinImpactsAQ‐3a‐1,AQ‐3a‐2,AQ‐3b,andAQ‐3c.Impactswouldbesignificantandunavoidableforconstructionandlessthansignificantforoperation.

Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis

Air Quality 

 

APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐43 

October 2014ICF 00323.08

 

3.3.3 References Cited 

Printed References 

AlamedaCounty.1998.DraftEnvironmentalImpactReport—RepoweringaPortionoftheAltamontPassWindResourceArea.August.StateClearinghouse#98022024.Hayward,CA:AlamedaCountyCommunityDevelopmentAgency.

———.2000.EastCountyAreaPlan.AdoptedMay1994.ModifiedbypassageofMeasureD,effectiveDecember22,2000.Oakland,CA.

BayAreaAirQualityManagementDistrict.2010.BayAreaAirQualityManagementDistrict—LivermoreValley.Available:http://www.baaqmd.gov/Divisions/Communications‐and‐Outreach/Air‐Quality‐in‐the‐Bay‐Area/Bay‐Area‐Climatology/Subregions/Livermore‐Valley.aspx.LastUpdated:October4,2010.Accessed:June26,2013.

———.2011.CaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityActAirQualityGuidelines.Available:http://www.baaqmd.gov/~/media/Files/Planning%20and%20Research/CEQA/BAAQMD%20CEQA%20Guidelines%20May%202011.ashx.LastUpdated:May2011.Accessed:July10,2013.

———.2012.CaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityActAirQualityGuidelines.Available:http://www.baaqmd.gov/~/media/Files/Planning%20and%20Research/CEQA/BAAQMD%20CEQA%20Guidelines_Final_May%202012.ashx?la=en.LastUpdated:May2012.Accessed:July10,2013.

CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard.1998.FindingsoftheScientificReviewontheReportonDieselExhaust.AdoptedApril22.Available:http://www.arb.ca.gov/toxics/dieseltac/combined.pdf.Accessed:April8,2013.

———.2000.RiskReductionPlantoReduceParticulateMatterEmissionsfromDiesel‐FueledEnginesandVehicles.Sacramento,CA.PreparedbyStationarySourceDivisionandMobileSourceControlDivision.Available:http://www.arb.ca.gov/diesel/documents/rrpfinal.pdf.Accessed:June27,2013.

———.2009.TheCaliforniaAlmanacofEmissionsandAirQuality–2009Edition.Chapter4:AirBasinTrendsandForecasts‐‐CriteriaPollutants.Available:http://www.arb.ca.gov/aqd/almanac/almanac09/pdf/chap409.pdf.Accessed:February12,2014.

———.2011.AreaDesignationsMaps.Available:http://www.arb.ca.gov/desig/adm/adm.htm.Accessed:June26,2013.

———.2013a.AmbientAirQualityStandards.June.Available:http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/aaqs/aaqs2.pdf.Accessed:June26,2013.

———.2013b.Top4Summary:Pollutant/YearRangeSelection.Available:http://www.arb.ca.gov/adam/topfour/topfour1.php.Accessed:June26,2013.

———.2013c.EmissionFactorModel(EMFAC)2011.Available:http://www.arb.ca.gov/msei/modeling.htm.Accessed:June9,2013.

Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis

Air Quality 

 

APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐44 

October 2014ICF 00323.08

 

ContraCostaCounty.2010.VascoWindsRepoweringProject DraftEnvironmentalImpactReportandAppendices.December.Available:http://www.co.contra‐costa.ca.us/DocumentCenter/Home/View/5349.Accessed:July10,2010.

SanJoaquinValleyAirPollutionControlDistrict.2002.GuideforAssessingandMitigatingAirQualityImpacts.LastRevised:January10,2002.Available:http://www.valleyair.org/transportation/CEQA%20Rules/GAMAQI%20Jan%202002%20Rev.pdf.Accessed:July18,2013.

———.2013.AmbientAirQualityStandardsandValleyAttainmentStatus.Available:http://www.valleyair.org/aqinfo/attainment.htm.Accessed:July18,2013.

SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict.2006.ParticulateMatter(PM)2.5SignificanceThresholdsandCalculationMethodology.AppendixA—UpdatedCEIDARSTablewithPM2.5Fractions.Available:http://www.aqmd.gov/ceqa/handbook/PM2_5/PM2_5.html.Accessed:July10,2013.

———.2011.CaliforniaEmissionEstimatorModel(CalEEMod).User’sGuideVersion2011.1—AppendixDDefaultDataTables—Table3.4.DevelopedbyENVIRONInternationalCorporationincollaborationwithSCAQMDandotherCaliforniaAirDistricts.Available:http://www.caleemod.com/.Accessed:October4,2011.

U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency.1995a.AP42,CompilationofAirPollutantEmissionFactors,Volume1:StationaryPointandAreaSources.FifthEdition.Chapter3.3,GasolineandDieselIndustrialEngines.Available:http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch03/final/c03s03.pdf.Accessed:July9,2013.

———.1995b.AP42,CompilationofAirPollutantEmissionFactors.FifthEdition.Section11.9,WesternSurfaceCoalMining.AsCitedinCalEEModUserGuide(2011),AppendixA(page8).Available:http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch11/final/c11s09.pdf.Accessed:July9,2013.

———.1995c.AP42,CompilationofAirPollutantEmissionFactors.FifthEdition.Section11.12,ConcreteBatching.Available:http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch11/final/c11s12.pdf.Accessed:July10,2013.

———.2012.TheGreenBookNonattainmentAreasforCriteriaPollutants.LastRevised:December14,2012.Available:http://www.epa.gov/oar/oaqps/greenbk/.Accessed:June27,2013.

———.2013a.NitrogenDioxide.LastUpdated:April4,2013.Available:http://www.epa.gov/airquality/nitrogenoxides/.Accessed:June26,2013.

———.2013b.Health|NitrogenDioxide.LastUpdated:February14,2013.Available:http://www.epa.gov/airquality/nitrogenoxides/health.html.Accessed:June26,2013.

WesternRegionalClimateCenter.2013.PeriodofRecordMonthlyClimateSummariesforLivermore,California.Available:http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/cgi‐bin/cliMAIN.pl?ca4997.Accessed:June26,2013.

Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis

Air Quality 

 

APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐45 

October 2014ICF 00323.08

 

Personal Communications 

Kirk,Alison.SeniorEnvironmentalPlanner,BayAreaAirQualityManagementDistrict,PlanningandResearchDivision.August31,2011—emaildescribingtheintentoftheBAAQMDdailyconstructionemissionsthresholds.

Siong,Patia.AirQualityPlanner,SanJoaquinValleyUnifiedAirPollutionControlDistrict.May23,2011—emailtoShannonHatcherregardingconstructionthresholds.


Top Related