![Page 1: A CASE STUDY United States v. Nixon. Separation of Powers The division of the powers of government among the different branches Separation of powers is](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022082203/56649ed55503460f94be6093/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
A CASE STUDY
United States v. Nixon
![Page 2: A CASE STUDY United States v. Nixon. Separation of Powers The division of the powers of government among the different branches Separation of powers is](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022082203/56649ed55503460f94be6093/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Separation of Powers
The division of the powers of government among the different branches
Separation of powers is a primary strategy of promoting constitutional or limited government by ensuring that no one individual or branch can abuse its powers
Intertwined with the concept of checks and balances
![Page 3: A CASE STUDY United States v. Nixon. Separation of Powers The division of the powers of government among the different branches Separation of powers is](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022082203/56649ed55503460f94be6093/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
KNOW: Executive Privilege
Right of the President to withhold information from the other branches to preserve confidential communications within the executive branch or to secure the national interest.
Not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution.
![Page 4: A CASE STUDY United States v. Nixon. Separation of Powers The division of the powers of government among the different branches Separation of powers is](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022082203/56649ed55503460f94be6093/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
The Case
![Page 5: A CASE STUDY United States v. Nixon. Separation of Powers The division of the powers of government among the different branches Separation of powers is](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022082203/56649ed55503460f94be6093/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
June 17, 1972 Watergate Break-in
Five men were arrested inside the Democratic National Committee’s offices in the Watergate complex in Washington, D.C. at 2:30 am. They were trying to bug the offices.
Former Attorney General John Mitchell, head of the Nixon reelection campaign denies any link to the break-in.
Image from http://wwwimage.cbsnews.com/images/2005/02/15/image674276x.jpg
![Page 6: A CASE STUDY United States v. Nixon. Separation of Powers The division of the powers of government among the different branches Separation of powers is](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022082203/56649ed55503460f94be6093/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Nixon Reelected
October 1972: FBI agents establish that the Watergate break-in stems from a massive campaign of political spying and sabotage conducted on behalf of the Nixon reelection effort, The Washington Post reports.
November 1972: Nixon is reelected in one of the largest landslides in American political history, taking more than 60 percent of the vote and crushing the Democratic nominee, Sen. George McGovern of South Dakota
![Page 7: A CASE STUDY United States v. Nixon. Separation of Powers The division of the powers of government among the different branches Separation of powers is](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022082203/56649ed55503460f94be6093/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
The Case Continues
• January 1973: Former Nixon aides G. Gordon Liddy and James W. McCord Jr. were indicted. They were convicted of conspiracy, burglary and wiretapping in the Watergate incident. Five other men pled guilty, but mysteries remain.
![Page 8: A CASE STUDY United States v. Nixon. Separation of Powers The division of the powers of government among the different branches Separation of powers is](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022082203/56649ed55503460f94be6093/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Resignations and Firings
• April 1973: Nixon’s top White House staffers, H.R. Haldeman and John Ehrlichman, and Attorney General Richard Kleindienst resign over the scandal. White House counsel John Dean is fired.
![Page 9: A CASE STUDY United States v. Nixon. Separation of Powers The division of the powers of government among the different branches Separation of powers is](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022082203/56649ed55503460f94be6093/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Investigation
• The Senate Watergate committee begins its nationally televised hearings. Former solicitor general Archibald Cox is chosen as the Justice Department’s special prosecutor for Watergate.
Image from http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/72/ThompsonWatergate.jpg/300px-ThompsonWatergate.jpg
![Page 10: A CASE STUDY United States v. Nixon. Separation of Powers The division of the powers of government among the different branches Separation of powers is](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022082203/56649ed55503460f94be6093/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Timeline
• June 1973: John Dean (former White House Counsel who was fired) told Watergate investigators that he discussed the Watergate cover-up with President Nixon at least 35 times, The Post reports.
![Page 11: A CASE STUDY United States v. Nixon. Separation of Powers The division of the powers of government among the different branches Separation of powers is](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022082203/56649ed55503460f94be6093/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
The Tapes
Former presidential appointments secretary, reveals in congressional testimony that since 1971 Nixon had recorded all conversations and telephone calls in his offices.
President Nixon refused to release the tapes to Congress or the Special Prosecutor. He claimed they were
protected under “executive privilege”.
Image from http://www.pimall.com/nais/pivintage/images/ovalofficerecorder.jpg
![Page 12: A CASE STUDY United States v. Nixon. Separation of Powers The division of the powers of government among the different branches Separation of powers is](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022082203/56649ed55503460f94be6093/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Timeline
• October 1973: Saturday Night Massacre: Nixon fires Archibald Cox (Special Prosecutor) and abolishes the office of the special prosecutor. Attorney General Richardson and Deputy Attorney General William D. Ruckelshaus resign. Pressure for impeachment mounts in Congress.
• November 1973: Nixon declares, “I’m not a crook,” maintaining his innocence in the Watergate case.
![Page 13: A CASE STUDY United States v. Nixon. Separation of Powers The division of the powers of government among the different branches Separation of powers is](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022082203/56649ed55503460f94be6093/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
The Release of the Tapes
Nixon finally released some of the tapes, but portions of them were blank.
Watch a short review of the Watergate scandal.
http://www.newseum.org/digital-classroom/video/watergate/default.aspx
![Page 14: A CASE STUDY United States v. Nixon. Separation of Powers The division of the powers of government among the different branches Separation of powers is](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022082203/56649ed55503460f94be6093/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Transcripts
• April 30, 1974: The White House releases more than 1,200 pages of edited transcripts of the Nixon tapes to the House Judiciary Committee, but the committee insists that the full tapes themselves must be turned over.
![Page 15: A CASE STUDY United States v. Nixon. Separation of Powers The division of the powers of government among the different branches Separation of powers is](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022082203/56649ed55503460f94be6093/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
KNOW: Summary
Called the “Watergate Scandal” Because the Democratic National Committee was
located in the Watergate building People involved in President Nixon’s reelection were
caught trying to “bug” the offices to get information and help him get reelected
President Nixon stated that “executive privilege” was in place and he did not have to share recordings of conversations in his office (turned over recording and transcripts with pieces missing and/or deleted)
![Page 16: A CASE STUDY United States v. Nixon. Separation of Powers The division of the powers of government among the different branches Separation of powers is](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022082203/56649ed55503460f94be6093/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Executive Privilege?
NIXON ASSERTED THAT HE WAS IMMUNE FROM THE SUBPOENA CLAIMING "EXECUTIVE
PRIVILEGE," WHICH IS THE RIGHT TO WITHHOLD INFORMATION FROM OTHER GOVERNMENT BRANCHES TO PRESERVE
CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATIONS WITHIN THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH OR TO SECURE THE
NATIONAL INTEREST.
![Page 17: A CASE STUDY United States v. Nixon. Separation of Powers The division of the powers of government among the different branches Separation of powers is](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022082203/56649ed55503460f94be6093/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
WANT TO KNOW:
Take a few minutes and reflect on what we have learned. What more do you WANT to know? What are some specific questions you have about the case? Does it make you question anything?
![Page 18: A CASE STUDY United States v. Nixon. Separation of Powers The division of the powers of government among the different branches Separation of powers is](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022082203/56649ed55503460f94be6093/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
WHAT DO YOU THINK: Question
IS THE PRESIDENT'S RIGHT TO SAFEGUARD CERTAIN INFORMATION, USING HIS
"EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE" CONFIDENTIALITY POWER, ENTIRELY IMMUNE FROM JUDICIAL
REVIEW?
HYPOTHESIZE: DO YOU THINK THE PRESIDENT SHOULD HAVE THIS RIGHT OR
NOT? WHY??? CAN YOU GIVE ANY HISTORICAL EXAMPLES?
![Page 19: A CASE STUDY United States v. Nixon. Separation of Powers The division of the powers of government among the different branches Separation of powers is](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022082203/56649ed55503460f94be6093/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Precedent
![Page 20: A CASE STUDY United States v. Nixon. Separation of Powers The division of the powers of government among the different branches Separation of powers is](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022082203/56649ed55503460f94be6093/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
KNOW: Marbury v. Madison
This case established the court’s power of judicial review.
Judicial review: The power of the courts to declare laws and actions of the local and state government or the national government invalid if they are found to contradict the US Constitution.
![Page 21: A CASE STUDY United States v. Nixon. Separation of Powers The division of the powers of government among the different branches Separation of powers is](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022082203/56649ed55503460f94be6093/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
United States v. Burr
Burr requested the court to subpoena the President during grand jury proceedings so he could view the evidence that would be used against him. Burr was being tried for treason.
The arguments Jefferson offered for not fully complying with the subpoena included the President's executive privilege and his duty to preserve national security by maintaining the confidentiality of certain negotiations.
![Page 22: A CASE STUDY United States v. Nixon. Separation of Powers The division of the powers of government among the different branches Separation of powers is](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022082203/56649ed55503460f94be6093/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Decision
Chief Justice John Marshall’s (presided in this federal circuit case – not US Supreme Court) ruling established that no man, not even the President is above the law.
President Jefferson followed Chief Justice Marshall’s orders.
![Page 23: A CASE STUDY United States v. Nixon. Separation of Powers The division of the powers of government among the different branches Separation of powers is](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022082203/56649ed55503460f94be6093/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Historical Examples Outside the Court
George Washington refused to turn over to the House certain documents related to treaty negotiations between US and Great Britain.
President Eisenhower in a stand-off with Senator Joseph McCarthy wrote that the President could refuse to turn over any document he felt was privileged or confidential. Coined the term Executive Privilege.
![Page 24: A CASE STUDY United States v. Nixon. Separation of Powers The division of the powers of government among the different branches Separation of powers is](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022082203/56649ed55503460f94be6093/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
WANT TO KNOW:
Take a few minutes and reflect on what we have learned. What more do you WANT to know? What are some specific questions you have about the case? Does it make you question anything?
![Page 25: A CASE STUDY United States v. Nixon. Separation of Powers The division of the powers of government among the different branches Separation of powers is](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022082203/56649ed55503460f94be6093/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
The US Supreme Court
![Page 26: A CASE STUDY United States v. Nixon. Separation of Powers The division of the powers of government among the different branches Separation of powers is](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022082203/56649ed55503460f94be6093/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
United StatesUnited States President NixonPresident Nixon
Executive privilege is not an absolute power.
Executive privilege cannot be used to deny the Court’s access to evidence.
The President should not be able to be the final arbiter of what the Constitution means.
This does not involve confidential national security interests.
The US Constitution allows the President the power of executive privilege.
The power to withhold information is the President’s absolute power. The President must have this power to maintain national security interests.
The dispute should be resolved in the executive branch.
Two Arguments
![Page 27: A CASE STUDY United States v. Nixon. Separation of Powers The division of the powers of government among the different branches Separation of powers is](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022082203/56649ed55503460f94be6093/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Now it is your turn to be the judge
![Page 28: A CASE STUDY United States v. Nixon. Separation of Powers The division of the powers of government among the different branches Separation of powers is](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022082203/56649ed55503460f94be6093/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Individually Answer the Question
YES or NO based on…
The facts of the case
The Constitution
Precedent
Give 3 Reasons in Writing
![Page 29: A CASE STUDY United States v. Nixon. Separation of Powers The division of the powers of government among the different branches Separation of powers is](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022082203/56649ed55503460f94be6093/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Is there an executive privilege in this case?
If you answer YES…
If you answer NO…
You are siding with President Nixon
You are siding with the United States
![Page 30: A CASE STUDY United States v. Nixon. Separation of Powers The division of the powers of government among the different branches Separation of powers is](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022082203/56649ed55503460f94be6093/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Unanimous Decision, 8-0
Burger StewartBrennanDouglas
PowellBlackmunMarshallWhite
![Page 31: A CASE STUDY United States v. Nixon. Separation of Powers The division of the powers of government among the different branches Separation of powers is](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022082203/56649ed55503460f94be6093/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Outcome of US v Nixon
July 24, 1974: The Supreme Court rules unanimously that Nixon must turn over the tape recordings of 64 White House conversations, rejecting the president’s claims of executive privilege.
![Page 32: A CASE STUDY United States v. Nixon. Separation of Powers The division of the powers of government among the different branches Separation of powers is](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022082203/56649ed55503460f94be6093/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Decision
The US Supreme Court held that neither the doctrine of separation of powers, nor the generalized need for confidentiality of high-level communications, without more, can sustain an absolute, unqualified, presidential privilege.
The Court granted that there was a limited executive privilege in areas of military or diplomatic affairs, but gave preference to "the fundamental demands of due process of law in the fair administration of justice."
![Page 33: A CASE STUDY United States v. Nixon. Separation of Powers The division of the powers of government among the different branches Separation of powers is](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022082203/56649ed55503460f94be6093/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
The Decision
Nixon had to release the tapes (there was no executive privilege)
The Court has jurisdiction in this case
Executive privilege conflicts with the constitutional obligation of the judicial branch and the functions of the court
In order to ensure due process, all “relevant and admissible evidence” must be produced
Image from http://www.minnpost.com/_asset/nkwrw0/mp_main_half/WarrenBurger212.jpg
![Page 34: A CASE STUDY United States v. Nixon. Separation of Powers The division of the powers of government among the different branches Separation of powers is](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022082203/56649ed55503460f94be6093/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Significance
The RULE OF LAW
United States v Nixon reinforced the rule of law establishing that no one, even the President of the United States, is above the law.
Concept that citizens are governed by the law and institutions, not individuals. The law supersedes all else an dis intended to be constant, predictable, and just.
![Page 35: A CASE STUDY United States v. Nixon. Separation of Powers The division of the powers of government among the different branches Separation of powers is](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022082203/56649ed55503460f94be6093/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Listen to oral arguments and opinion
http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1974/1974_73_1766
![Page 36: A CASE STUDY United States v. Nixon. Separation of Powers The division of the powers of government among the different branches Separation of powers is](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022082203/56649ed55503460f94be6093/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Resignation
• July 27, 1974: House Judiciary Committee passes the first of three articles of impeachment, charging obstruction of justice.
• August 8, 1974: Richard Nixon becomes the first U.S. president to resign. Vice President Gerald R. Ford assumes the country’s highest office.
![Page 37: A CASE STUDY United States v. Nixon. Separation of Powers The division of the powers of government among the different branches Separation of powers is](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022082203/56649ed55503460f94be6093/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Image Citations
http://riverdaughter.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/pentagon-papers.jpg
http://www.pophistorydig.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/soldiers-bayonets-50.jpg
http://wwwimage.cbsnews.com/images/2005/02/15/image674276x.jpg
http://obscurantist.com/images/e_howard_hunt.jpg http://www.gizmotastic.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/
g_gordon_liddy.jpg http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/72/
ThompsonWatergate.jpg/300px-ThompsonWatergate.jpg http://www.pimall.com/nais/pivintage/images/ovalofficerecorder.jpg http://www.minnpost.com/_asset/nkwrw0/mp_main_half/
WarrenBurger212.jpg http://www.oyez.org