Download - A new Intermediate construction frameworks Edward Currie and Mark Thomas Framework Managers
![Page 1: A new Intermediate construction frameworks Edward Currie and Mark Thomas Framework Managers](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070414/5697c0151a28abf838cce01f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
A new Intermediate construction frameworks
Edward Currie and Mark Thomas
Framework Managers
![Page 2: A new Intermediate construction frameworks Edward Currie and Mark Thomas Framework Managers](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070414/5697c0151a28abf838cce01f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Complementary frameworks for capacity
• Issues with SEaL framework with interest in smaller projects (especially D&B)
• Analysis showed problem most acute for projects £1m to £4m• Hence two complementary frameworks
SCF (SE) for projects > £4m 8 contractors
ICF (Hampshire) for projects £0.5m to £4m 10 contractors
• Exactly the same operating model• Details of the new Major Works Framework @• www.southerconstrutionframework.org.uk
![Page 3: A new Intermediate construction frameworks Edward Currie and Mark Thomas Framework Managers](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070414/5697c0151a28abf838cce01f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Tier 3 (LCF)3 Lots (18 contractors)
£1 to £1.5m
Tier 2 (ICF)1 Lot (10 contractors)
£0.5m to £4m
Tier 2 £750k to £5m (8 contractors)
Tier 3 £50k to £750k (8 contractors)
Tier 4 £1 to £50k (6 contractors)
Tier 2 £750k to £6.5m (11 contractors)
Tier 3 £1 to £750k (11 contractors)
SE SUB REGIONAL FRAMEWORKS
Tier 3 (Minor Works)Work in progress
![Page 4: A new Intermediate construction frameworks Edward Currie and Mark Thomas Framework Managers](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070414/5697c0151a28abf838cce01f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Principles – 2 stage approach
Design Construction
Construct to agreed lump sum
Contractor selected from framework on
OHP, PC fee, construction staff
cost, design & ability to meet client brief and project budget
Integrated team develop designs and
costs, maximise efficiency within
budget whilst finalising package procurement with
tier 2 and 3
This framework approach has been tried and tested since HCC’s first framework in 2004 for the Nursing Care Programme
![Page 5: A new Intermediate construction frameworks Edward Currie and Mark Thomas Framework Managers](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070414/5697c0151a28abf838cce01f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Learning – Feedback from previous users
• Frustration with the template approach to the Framework Tender
• Complications with Preliminary pricing tied to templates
• Preconstruction time based, not output based
• Lack of transparency in preconstruction
• No market intelligence
• Contractor performance variable
• Lack of enforcement of framework requirements
![Page 6: A new Intermediate construction frameworks Edward Currie and Mark Thomas Framework Managers](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070414/5697c0151a28abf838cce01f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
New Framework Features
• Specified Contractor duties Framework Director Framework Account Manager
• Not to exceed rates for OHP, Preconstruction, construction and design
• Faster contractor selection process • Minimum standards of contractor performance across a
range of project, performance and social value KPI’s • Designed to help authorities implement key initiatives
such as BIM and Project Bank Accounts through signed charters
![Page 7: A new Intermediate construction frameworks Edward Currie and Mark Thomas Framework Managers](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070414/5697c0151a28abf838cce01f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
What was included in The Framework Tender
Specified•Roles•Duties•Deliverables
10 Contractors:Amiri, Beard, Interserve, Kier, Lakehouse, MidasLongcross, Osborne, Raymond Brown, Stirland
![Page 8: A new Intermediate construction frameworks Edward Currie and Mark Thomas Framework Managers](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070414/5697c0151a28abf838cce01f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
The Mini Competition Process
Opportunity pipeline published – M2i
Project details published on procurement portal (sets not to exceed price)
MC 1 run through procurement portal
Framework manager / project officer short list to 3
Project Officer issues and runs MC2
![Page 9: A new Intermediate construction frameworks Edward Currie and Mark Thomas Framework Managers](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070414/5697c0151a28abf838cce01f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Confirmation of (Questions may be weighted):•Preference for type of project•Ability to deliver (capability)•Capacity of contractor and supply chain•Ability to add valueSelf scored responses to pre-set criteria, supported by word limited written evidence. Evaluated by framework manager, who agrees outcome with project officer.
Principles of Mini Competition 1
![Page 10: A new Intermediate construction frameworks Edward Currie and Mark Thomas Framework Managers](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070414/5697c0151a28abf838cce01f/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Preferred outcome is for three contractors to proceed to MC2.•Sensitive to contractor right to appeal•Sensitive to officer view on self scoring•May be more than three in MC2
Framework Manager to feed back to unsuccessful contractors
Outcome of Mini Competition 1
![Page 11: A new Intermediate construction frameworks Edward Currie and Mark Thomas Framework Managers](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070414/5697c0151a28abf838cce01f/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Cost – 30% weighting•OHP %•Pre construction fee%•Construction fee %•Design fee %•If applicable and appropriate, may include Preliminary items Rates may not exceed the tender percentages from the price point, but may be less, and will be converted to lump sums based on the construction value
Principles of Mini Competition 2
Sub
cat
egor
ies
not w
eigh
ted
– si
ngle
com
mer
cial
sco
re
![Page 12: A new Intermediate construction frameworks Edward Currie and Mark Thomas Framework Managers](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070414/5697c0151a28abf838cce01f/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Technical – 70% weighting, with the following question areas:•QA and performance (Continuous Improvement) •Design Management & Development •Supply Chain Management •Handover and Aftercare •Social Responsibility – Mandatory question •Financial Control – Mandatory question on cost plan •Framework delivery – Project delivery •Programmes of Work
Questions may be weighted
Principles of Mini Competition 2
![Page 13: A new Intermediate construction frameworks Edward Currie and Mark Thomas Framework Managers](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070414/5697c0151a28abf838cce01f/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Award and feed back
• Project Officer to award Agreed costsAgreed programmePre construction agreement
• Project Officer to feed back to unsuccessful contractors
![Page 14: A new Intermediate construction frameworks Edward Currie and Mark Thomas Framework Managers](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070414/5697c0151a28abf838cce01f/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Key gateways
![Page 15: A new Intermediate construction frameworks Edward Currie and Mark Thomas Framework Managers](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070414/5697c0151a28abf838cce01f/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Managing performance
• Minimum standards of performance
Cost predictability Time predictability Team performance scores Defects at handover SME spend Health and safety
![Page 16: A new Intermediate construction frameworks Edward Currie and Mark Thomas Framework Managers](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070414/5697c0151a28abf838cce01f/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Who we are
Keith HeardSenior Programme Manager
Edward CurrieRegional Programme Manager
L. Howell
N. Midmer C. Henderson
Vacancy
T. Moss K Larrive
Framework Team
M. Thomas
Contact DetailsT: 01962 845942