Download - Accountability Reporting The “ Scorecard ”
Accountability ReportingThe “Scorecard”
•Presentation to Academic Senate•November 1, 2012
•Rosaleen Ryan
The world in which we live…
Student Success Taskforce recommendation 7.3: Scorecard
Progress on intermediate measures of student success
Completion outcomes
To the extent possible, implementation of this recommendation will rely on existing ARCC measures
Today’s presentation• Current accountability framework
vs.• The upcoming Scorecard
• Examples of MPC’s performance
Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges (ARCC)
• In 2004, AB 1417 creation of a performance measurement system for the CCCs ARCC
• ARCC has systemwide and collegewide performance indicators
ARCC vs. Scorecard
• Student Progress and Achievement Rate (SPAR)
• 30 unit achievement rate• vs.
• NEW Student Progress and Achievement Rate (SPAR)
• NEW 30 unit achievement rate (“momentum” point)
The 2012 ARCC Report
7
Table 1.1: Percentage of first-time students who within 6 yrs “progressed”
or “achieved.” 2003-2004 to
2008-20092004-2005 to 2009-2010
2005-2006 to 2010-2011
Student Progress and Achievement Rate 56.1% 52.6% 54.2%
The 2012 ARCC Report
8
Table 1.1a: Percentage of first-time students who earned at least 30 Units in a CCC.
2003-2004 to 2008-2009
2004-2005 to 2009-2010
2005-2006 to 2010-2011
Percentage of Students Who Earned at Least 30 Units 70.1% 67.5% 66.6%
ARCC vs. Scorecard
• Persistence (Fall to Fall)• vs.
• NEW Persistence (Fall to Spring to Fall – 3 continuous terms)
The 2012 ARCC Report
10
Table 1.2: Percentage of first-time students who returned to any CCC the subsequent
Fall.
Fall 2007 to Fall 2008
Fall 2008 to Fall 2009
Fall 2009 to Fall 2010
Persistence Rate 69.9% 73.2% 74.5%
Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges (ARCC)
• Collegewide performance indicators include:• SPAR and 30 unit achievement rate• Fall-to-fall persistence• Successful CTE course completion rate• Basic Skills improvement rates
Scorecard• Statewide metrics• Collegewide metrics:
• SPAR• 30 unit achievement rate
(“momentum” point)• Fall-to-fall persistence (continuous
enrollment)• CTE completion rate (degree/cert or
transfer)• Basic Skills progression rates
ARCC vs. Scorecard • Successful course completion rates for
CTE courses• vs.
• NEW CTE completion rate (degree/certificate, transfer, transfer prepared)
The 2012 ARCC Report
14
Table 1.3: Annual Successful Course Completion Rate for Credit Vocational Courses.
2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011
Annual Successful Course Completion Rate for Vocational Courses
80.0% 78.1% 77.9%
ARCC vs. Scorecard
• Basic Skills Improvement rate• vs.
• NEW Basic Skills progression rate
The 2012 ARCC Report
16
Table 1.5: Improvement Rates for Basic Skills Courses
2006-2007 to 2008-2009
2007-2008 to 2009-2010
2008-2009 to 2010-2011
Basic Skills Improvement Rate 54.8% 60.8% 61.2%
The changing landscape of accountability reporting…
Focus on long-term distal outcomes, rather than short-term proximal outcomes
Tracking students over time
No context, no room for unique identity or for flexibility
Data are publicly available
Drilling down in the dataIndicators will be broken out by demographics
Questions???