Download - Achieving constructive alignment
© University of South Wales
Learning Outcomes and Assessment - Achieving Constructive Alignment
Richard Oelmann
CELT Seminar(Caerleon 9/2/16)
© University of South Wales
Richard Oelmann
• Centre for Excellence in Learning and Teaching
• Senior Learning Technologist• Previously – taught on Primary Initial
Teacher Training• Previously – Deputy Head Teacher
© University of South Wales
Seminar Summary
Constructive alignment (Biggs, 1996, Biggs & Tang, 2011) is an outcomes-based methodology for designing, promoting and assessing deep student learning.It is predicated on the belief that the student constructs his or her own learning through engaging in relevant learning activities (hence constructive). Alignment refers to what the teacher does, which is to create appropriate learning environments. This specifically involves selecting the most appropriate teaching and learning activities and assessment tasks for each of the learning outcomes.In its most rudimentary form, this selection is governed by the main verb in the outcome statement. In a more sophisticated form, verbs in learning or curriculum objective statements are typically used as a basis for alignment and refer to the specific steps (or component activities) that collectively lead the students towards the outcomes (Biggs & Tang, 2011; Jackson et al., 2003).
This session will look at how we can develop modules using the principles of constructive alignment in order to promote good teaching and thus deep student learning.
© University of South Wales
Why is Assessment Important?
“[A]ssessment…has a powerful influence on learning and…changes to assessment may have a greater influence on students’ learning than other changes to the curriculum. Assessment innovations are therefore needed to improve the quality of learning outcomes...” (Boud, 2006)
“students can, with difficulty, escape from the effects of poor teaching, they cannot (by definition, if they want to graduate) escape the effects of poor assessment.” (Boud, 1995, p.35)”
© University of South Wales
What our students say:
“Only those [tutors] who gave more novel ways [of assessment] …would explain to us that [the
assessment] is to build up our skills etc but I think coursework and exams are there as its
traditional, and there are no explanations behind the questions …it’s just like, this is the
coursework, do it … no explanation at all.”
Glamorgan Year 3 LLB student
© University of South Wales
Aligning Objectives, Teaching Methods and Assessment
Learning takes place through the active behaviour of the student: it is what he does that he learns, not what the teacher does.
Tyler, RW (1949)Basic principles of curriculum and instruction
University of Chicago Press
Constructive Alignment of learning outcomes and assessment is predicated on the belief that the student constructs his or her own learning through engaging in relevant learning activities (hence constructive)
© University of South Wales
Aligning Objectives, Teaching Methods and Assessment
If students are to learn desired outcomes in a reasonably effective manner, then the teacher's fundamental task is to get students to engage in learning activities that are likely to result in their achieving those outcomes... It is helpful to remember that what the student does is actually more important in determining what is learned than what the teacher does.
Shuel, TJ (1986)Cognitive conceptions of learning
Review of Educational research, 56, 411-436
© University of South Wales
Constructive Alignment
LO
Learning and teaching activities
Designed to meet LO
LO
Intended LearningOutcomes
LO
Assessment Methods
Designed to Assess LO
Biggs(1999) Teaching for Quality Learning at University, (SRHE and Open University Press, Buckingham
© University of South Wales
Key Decisions
First we get the objectives straight, what the students have to do. Then we decide how to get them to do it. Assessment serves a double purpose: it checks the quality of learning, and for students, it defines what is to be learned.
Biggs, JB (1999)What the student does:Teaching for quality learning at university
Open University Press
© University of South Wales
Aligning curriculum objectives, teaching/learning activities and assessment tasks
Activity
© University of South Wales
Aligning curriculum objectives, teaching/learning activities and assessment tasks
Curriculum Objectives expressed as verbs
AReflect, Hypothesise, Generate, Apply to 'far' domains, Relate to principles
BApply to 'near' domainsAnalyse, Compare, Explain, Solve, Understand main ideas
CElaborate, Classify, Cover topics a-n, Describe
DLearn procedures, Name, Memorise
Teaching/Learning Activities
Designed to elicit desired verbs- Teacher controlled- Peer controlled- Student controlled
Assessment Tasks
Evaluate how well the target verbs are drawn out and used in contextThe highest level of verb to be clearly manifested becomes the final grade
© University of South Wales
Blooms Taxonomy
BLOOM B S (ed.) (1956) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the classification of educational goals – Handbook I: Cognitive Domain New York: McKay
© University of South Wales
Designing Curriculum Objectives
In designing curriculum objectives, it helps to use verbs to specify the activities we want the students to perform. These activities become the objectives.
In aligning instruction – the verbs are:
Identified in the objectives Drawn out in the chosen teaching/learning activities Embedded in the assessment tasks
© University of South Wales
The Nature of Understanding
Declarative knowledge – knowledge you can talk about
Functioning knowledge – knowledge you can put to work
In designing curriculum objectives, there is always a tension between coverage and depth of understanding.
© University of South Wales
Teaching/Learning activities → Forms of Learning
© University of South Wales
Assessing Student Learning
Assessment is the most important single component in the system:
Why we assess
What we assess
How we assess
Who is involved
© University of South Wales
What is Assessment?
In higher education, ‘assessment’ describes any processes that
appraise an individual’s knowledge, understanding, abilities
or skills
© University of South Wales
USW Assessment Policy
• To introduce a standard and consistent idea across the University and a focal point to implement change
• Aim: ‘ Assessment FOR Learning’
“ to develop a learning environment which promotes the student learning experience, facilitates the acquisition of competence in a range of relevant skills and leads to increased learner autonomy.”
http://celt.southwales.ac.uk/documents/download/297/
© University of South Wales
Key principles from the policy
• Principle 1: Assessment design should drive and promote effective learning
• Principle 2: Assessment is fit for purpose and methods are valid in measuring achievement against learning outcomes
• Principle 3: Requirements of assessment are clear and timely
• Principle 4: Assessment standards are best understood through active dialogue between staff and students
• Principle 5: Students should engage with assessment standards
seamlessly as part of their course in order to internalise those standards and calibrate their own learning
© University of South Wales
Key principles from the policy
• Principle 6: Ongoing formative feedback based on dialogue and integrated into learning and teaching develops high level learning and improves assessment prospects. Summative feedback should be timely, be aligned to the learning outcomes, and should feed forward
• Principle 7: Assessment loads must be balanced and achievable within appropriate timeframes, with a presumption towards fewer more challenging assessments
• Principle 8: Students learn in different ways, and should be challenged to do unfamiliar things, so there should be variety in assessment across a course
© University of South Wales
Key principles from the policy
• Principle 9: Assessment judgements (i.e. marks/ grading/ classification) should be reliable and trusted, which involves developing shared understandings/professional judgements in course teams on assessment standards
• Principle 10: That assessment is secure
• Principle 11: That assessment is designed to minimise opportunities for academic malpractice including plagiarism
• Principle 12: That some assessment in each level is based on real life ‘live’ briefs and simulation, that take learners out of the classroom, builds confidence, motivation and skills for employability
© University of South Wales
Assessment Criteria
An assessment criterion can be defined as what a student must do to demonstrate that
the learning outcome has been achieved
© University of South Wales
Constructive Alignment Revisited
LOLearning and teaching activities
Designed to meet LO
LO
Intended LearningOutcomes
LO
Assessment Methods
Designed to Assess LO
Biggs(1999) Teaching for Quality Learning at University, (SRHE and Open University Press, Buckingham
© University of South Wales
So how do we do it?
• Redesign the learning outcome in the light of what you believe students will need to do in the assessment (iteratively)
• Try your assessment outline out on a non-specialist before sharing it with your students
• Focus of assessment must always be about the learning process of the student and not simply on content of knowledge
© University of South Wales
Need to avoid
• Hidden assessment criteria• Assuming the students can read your mind• Assessment where there are no apparent links to
learning outcomes• Grading based on something that is not explicit in the
criteria
© University of South Wales
Marking v Assessing
A criterion-referenced qualitative approach demands holistic assessment, using the same framework used for formulating objectives.
Do your assessments assess coverage or understanding?