Download - Acute Appendicytis
LECTURE ACUTE APPENDICITIS
Acute appendicitis till now is one of the most important surgical problems. It's
enough to say, that appendectomy constitutes about 20 -30% of all surgery. In Ukraine
about 500.000 appendectomies are performed annually without marked downtrend (A.A.
Shalimov, 1989). Studies of appendix had passed many stages before the modern system
of etiology, pathogenesis, clinical picture and treatment was created. This disease is
insidious one. The existent conception about it as about of slight indisposition is easily
disproved by statistics. Lethality seems to be not high, taking into consideration the
incidence of the disease; it is rarely exceeds 0,2-0,3%, but these figures mean dozens of
thousands lives.
The first appendectomies had been performed by Kronlein in 1883, by Malomed in
1884, and by A.A. Troyanov in 1890.
Brief Anatomo-Topographic Sketch
Vermiform appendix (appendix vermiformis) is the constituent of the iliocaecal
angle, which presents morphological integrity of four intestinal departments: the caecum,
terminal end of the ileum, initial part of the ascending colon, and the vermiform process.
All the constituents of the iliocaecal angle are in strict correlation and perform the
function of "internal analyzer", coordinating the most important function of the intestine
— conduction of chyme from the small to large intestine (A.M. Maximenkov, 1972).
The important element of iliocaecal angle is the iliocaecal (Bauhin's) valve (valva
ileocaecalis) with very intricate structure. Its function is to accomplish regulation in
transition of intestinal content to the caecum in little portions and to prevent its return
from the caecum to the small intestine.
The iliocaecal angle is situated in the right ileac fossa. Fundus of the caecum is
projected on the distance of 4-5 cm upwards the center of the inguinal ligament; under
condition of its filling, fundus of caecum is located just above the center of the inguinal
ligament or may even descend to the small pelvis. Great variability in anatomo-
topographic situation of the caecum and the vermiform process explains in many respects
such a diversity of clinical picture, which may be observed in acute appendicitis.
1
The most frequent and practically important deviations from the normal position of
the caecum are the following (V. I. Kolesov,1959):
1) high, or hepatic position, when the caecum and the vermiform process are
situated high, sometimes reaching the lower border of the liver;
2) low, or pelvic position, when the caecum and the vermiform process are situated
below normal, i.e. descends to the pelvis.
Other variants of it localization, such as its left-side position, location along the
middle line of the abdomen, in the umbilical region, in the left hypochondrium, in the
hernial sac, etc. occur rather infrequently.
The vermiform process is located intraperitoneally. It has its own mesentery
(mesenteriolum), which supplies it with vessels and nerves.
Blood supply of the iliocaecal angel is provided owing to the superior mesenteric
artery — a. ileocolica, which is subdivided into the anterior and posterior iliac arteries.
The natural artery of vermiform process — a. appendicularis, which may have a loose,
arterial or mixed structure, branches off from a. ileocolica or from its branch. Artery of
the vermiform process goes through its mesenteries, along its free edge, to the end of the
process. Though its small caliber (from 1 to 3 mm), post-operative hemorrhages from a.
appendicularis may be very intensive, as a rule, they require relaparotomy.
Veins of the caecum and the vermiform process are the tributaries of the ileocolic
vein (v. ileocolica), which flows in the superior mesenteric vein (v. mesenterica superior).
Innervation of the iliocaecal angle is performed by the superior mesenteric plexus,
which is connected with the celiac (solar) plexus, which takes part in innervation of all
digestive organs. The iliocaecal angle is considered to be "the junction depot" of all
abdominal organs innervation. Running from here impulses influence functions of many
organs. The peculiarity of innervation of the iliocaecal angle and the vermiform process
explains the onset of pain in the epigastrium and their spreading over the abdomen in
acute appendicitis.
Lymph outflow from the vermiform process and from the iliocaecal angle performs
entirely to the lymphatic vessels, which are situated along the ileocolic artery. There is a
2
chain of lymph nodes (10-20) along this artery, which extends to the central group of
mesenteric lymph nodes. Immediate proximity of the mesenteric and iliac lymph nodes
explains the similarity of clinical picture in inflammation of these nodes (acute
mesenteric adenitis) and in inflammation of the vermiform process.
Five variants of localization of the vermiform process with respect to the caecum
are distinguished: descending (caudal (is); lateral, internal (medial), anterior (ventral),
and posterior (retrocaecal). In descending, more frequent localization, the vermiform
process, directing towards the small pelvis, adjoins to certain extent the organs of the
small pelvis. In lateral position, the process lies from the outside of the caecum. Its apex
is directed to the inguinal (Poupart's) ligament. Medial localization is also rather frequent.
In those cases the vermiform process lays medially to the caecum, being localized
between the loops of the small intestine; all these provide favorable conditions for extent
inflammation inside the abdominal cavity and give rise to abscesses. The anterior
position of the process, in which it lies in front of the caecum, occurs rarely. Such
localization is favorable to anterior parietal abscess. Some of the surgeons mark out
ascending type of the process localization. Here, the two variants are possible. The first
one, in which the whole iliocaecal angle is located rather high, under the liver, and then
the term subhepatic position of the vermiform process is applied, or the second variant,
when the apex of the retrocaecal vermiform process is directed to ward the liver.
Retrocaecal position of the process, which is observed in 2-5% of the patients, two
variants of its bedding with respect to the peritoneum is characteristic: in some cases the
process, being covered with the peritoneum, lies in the iliac fossa behind the caecum,
while in other cases it projects from the leaf of the peritoneum and lies intraperitoneally.
This position of the vermiform process is termed retrocaecal (retroperitoneal) one. The
latter is considered to be the most insidious variant, especially in suppurative and
destructive appendicitis, since in the absence of the peritoneal cover of the process the
inflammatory process extends to the paraumbilical fat, causing deep retroperitoneal
phlegmon.
3
Etiology, Pathogenesis, Pathologic Anatomy, and Classification
There is no consensus of opinion about etiology of acute appendicitis. But there are
some theories explaining the causes of the disease and its pathogenesis. The most
common of them is mechanical (congestion), infectious, and aponeurotic theories.
Besides that, at different periods a number of conceptions, sometimes very original, were
elaborated. All the theories and conceptions, reflecting one or another etiological agent
are not without logic and sense. At the same time, a variety of forms and stages of acute
appendicitis suggests the polyetiology of this disease, which results from the changed
correlation between the human body and microorganisms. It being known, acute
appendicitis is a non-specific inflammation of the vermiform process. The causative
agents of infections may be staphylococci, colon bacilli, and mixed and anaerobic flora.
All the efforts on choosing a particular pathogenic organism and to number acute
appendicitis among specific inflammatory disease were not successful.
Mechanical theory indicates the role of foreign bodies, infections and scary
strictures of the vermiform process in development of acute appendicitis. But these
factors occur are far from being in all the patients. Helmint invasion and angina (sore
throat) are of great, but not absolute importance in genesis of the disease. Infectious
theory correctly indicates the role of infection and the primary affect, but does not
explain what stimulates an infection, which is permanently present in the lumen of the
vermiform process. And similar weak points take place among the other theories and
conceptions. Gained scientific and practical experience proves that taking into
consideration the variety of clinical and morphological forms of the disease, there may be
several predisposing factors and their combinations. For example, the following
mechanisms and ways of development of acute appendicitis are quite logical:
1 . Obstruction of the lumen of the process and formation of a closed cavity filled
with feces, which contain toxins with highly reactive enzymes, gradually result in
suppuration, lesion of the mucous membrane, and infection penetrates inside the
vermiform process wall. Development of exudative inflammation is accompanied by
microcirculatory disturbances and degeneration of intramural neural apparatus. But
neurodystrophic changes together with the vascular factor constantly result in
4
inflammatory intensification and its progressing up to formation of phlegmon or
gangrene.
2. Due to neurological disturbances, vascular stasis occurs in the vermiform
process. It results in trophopathy of the vermiform process and formation of necrotic foci.
Pathologically changed tissues are easily infected, i.e. secondary infection takes place.
The following spread of the infectious process causes more extensive pathologic changes
with all possible severe consequences.
3. Primary formation of acute ulceration in the vermiform process, which had been
observed by Selye at general adaptation syndrome, is possible. It may be the result of
neurogenic vasospasm.
4. In those cases, when abrupt clinical picture of the disease is followed very rapidly by
gangrene of the vermiform process, it is quite possible to consider primary thrombosis of
a. appendicularis and its branches. Inflammatory component and infection join
secondarily.
Appendicular colic. It means a muscle spasm of the vermiform process, caused by
any of pathologic process and proved by pain in the right iliac area. A surgeon makes this
diagnosis in those cases, when clinical manifestations disappear quickly, or when at the
time of operation he does not see any inflammatory changes in the vermiform process.
Catarrhal (congestive) appendicitis. Exudate may be absent or it may be in very
small amount. It is transparent, odorless. The peritoneum is unchanged and is hyperemic
a little. All changes are strictly localized in the vermiform process. It is hyperemic along
the whole length or at the limited site (usually distal one), thick to the touch, slightly
edematous. The lumen of the process may be either empty, or may contain mucus,
impacted feces, and foreign bodies. The mesentery is not changed, or may be slightly
edematous and hyperemic one. Microscopically: leukocyte infiltrations in the impaired
sites of the process. Sometimes it is possible to find out a defect of the mucous membrane
(primary affect), which is covered with fibrin and cellular elements.
Phlegmonous appendicitis. Exudate may be serous, serofibrous, seropurulent one.
Fetid odor appears at perforation of the vermiform appendix. In most of cases it is
possible to speak about the local peritonitis, but in advanced cases, when the process is
5
not delimited, but the amount of exudates is considerable and it baths the large sites of
the abdominal cavity, it is possible to consider diffuse and even general peritonitis. The
omentum, the caecum, and adjacent loops of the small intestine may be also involved in
the pathologic process. They are hyperemic, thickened, are covered with fibropurulent
deposit and are fused by loose adhesions. The vermiform appendix is considerably
enlarged in its sizes, is of dark red color, strained is covered with mucous fibrin. The sites
of white-yellowish pus may be often seen through the transparent serous coat. Pus, which
is inside the lumen of the organ, is gradually stretching it, and empyema is formed. The
mesentery is thickened, its leaves are hyperemic and edematous, may be easily treated.
Similar changes are frequently observed in the caecum cupola wall and considerably
complicate appendectomy. On microscopic examination it is possible to reveal leukocyte
infiltration of all the layers of the vermiform process; it is impossible to differentiate
them due to their saturation with pus. Apostematous appendicitis takes place in case of
appearance of multiple abscesses against a background of diffuse purulent inflammation
of appendix. In case of ulceration of the mucous membrane against a background of
phlegmonous appendicitis, phlegmonous-ulcerative appendicitis occurs.
Gangrenous appendicitis. Abdominal changes are similar to phlegmonous
appendicitis, but they are more pronounced. Exudate is turbid, with ichorous purulent
odor. The vermiform process is partly or completely of black, brown, brown-green,
black-brown, or dirty-gray color. Its wall is flabby with phlegmonous masses.
Gangrenous appendicitis is frequently perforating one, and then it is possible to see fetid
feces pouring through the opening in its wall inside the abdominal cavity. As a rule,
peritonitis occurs. It may be local, diffuse, or general, but according to the nature of
microflora, colibacillary, anaerobic, and mixed types are distinguished. Extensive
necrotic foci with bacteria colonies, hemorrhages, and vascular thrombosis may be
revealed on microscopic investigation. Somewhere it is possible to see the foci of
phlegmonous inflammation. The mucous membrane is ulcerated all along. As a rule,
destructive changes are pronounced up to perforation in the distal part of the organ.
Generalization of infection in a form of endotoxic shock occur in gangrenous
appendicitis more frequently than in other forms of inflammation.
6
Appendicular infiltrate is one of the complications of acute appendicitis. The
vermiform appendix, being destructively changed, becomes an epicenter of adhesion
process. A conglomerate of chaotically fused neighboring organs and tissues is formed
around it. The greater omentum, loops of the small intestine, the caecum and ascending
intestine, the peritoneum become involved in the pathologic process. The wall of these
organs are subjected to inflammatory infiltration, the boundaries between them become
gradually lost. Infiltrate rapidly increases in sizes, being compactly connected to the
anterior, posterior, and lateral walls of the abdomen. Sometimes infiltrate is of vast sizes,
occupying the whole right side of the abdomen.
Classification
But there are two classifications, which are used by the present and make it easier
to choose the policy of treatment. They are the classification according to A.I. Abrikosov
(1946), in which he wanted to reflect the problems of acute appendicitis pathologic
anatomy, and the classification according to V.I. Kolesov (1959), where he tried to reflect
clinical forms of acute appendicitis and its complications.
Classification according to A.I. Abrikosov:
I Superficial appendicitis (primary affect);
II Phlegmonous appendicitis:
1) simple phlegmonous appendicitis;
2) ulcer phlegmonous appendicitis;
3) apostematous appendicitis;
a) with perforation;
b) without perforation;
c) empyema of the vermiform appendix;
III Gangrenous appendicitis:
1)primary gangrenous appendicitis;
a) with perforation;
b) without perforation;
2) secondary gangrenous appendicitis:
7
a) with perforation;
b) without perforation.
Classification according to V.I. Kolesov:
I. Acute simple (superficial) appendicitis;
A) Without general clinical signs, but with mild local, quickly disappearing,
manifestations of the disease.
B) With insignificant general clinical signs and local manifestations of the disease.
II. Destructive acute appendicitis (phlegmonous, gangrenous, perforating):
A) With clinical picture of moderate severity and the signs of local peritonitis;
B) With severe clinical picture and the signs of local peritonitis;
III. Complicated appendicitis:
A) With appendicular infiltrate;
B) With appendicular abscess;
C) With diffuse peritonitis.
The Main Principles of Medical Aid in Acute Appendices
1) On suspicion of acute appendicitis the patient is subjected to urgent hospitalization to
the surgical unit, he is to be under constant medical care and to undergo additional
examination.
2) Recognized acute appendicitis requires an urgent surgical invention, irrespective to
manifestation of clinical picture, the age of a patient, duration of the disease (with the
exception of delimited infiltrates).
3) In vague cases, in the presence of suspicion of acute appendicitis, it is necessary to
perform laparoscopy or explorative laparotomy.
4) In the absence of changes in the vermiform appendix during the operation, or in case
of not corresponding of revealed changes with clinical picture, it is necessary to perform
revision of the abdominal cavity.
8
Clinical Picture, Diagnostics, and Treatment
Acute appendicitis is characterized by variety of clinical manifestations. I.I. Grekov
figuratively called it "a chameleon-like disease", and Y.Y. Dzhanelidze called it as
insidious one. Almost all the symptoms of acute appendicitis are non-specific, i.e. occur
in many other abdominal diseases. That is why the symptom is not important by itself,
but its characteristics, combination with other symptoms and the consequence of its
appearance are very important in diagnostics. One and the same symptom at different
stages of the disease and at different forms of it has its own features.
There are three main forms of acute appendicitis: 1) early stage (up to 12 hours); 2)
stage of development of destructive changes in the vermiform appendix (from 12 to 48
hours); 3) stage of complications (48 hours and more). This division at stages is rather
relative one, and the disease may run by its own, much more transient scenario, however,
more frequently it proceeds exactly in such a way.
Pain is the first and most common symptom of acute appendicitis. It occurs
predominantly at night, becomes constant, gradually intensifying. Patients may
characterize pain as piercing, cutting, burning, dull, acute one. At the first stage of the
disease the intensity of pain is not significant, it is quite tolerable. Patients do not cry or
moan, but also do not show superfluous motive activity, as jerky movements of the body,
for example, at cough (the cough shock symptom) intensify the pain. Cramping pain
occur very rarely.
Localization of pain is different. In typical cases it is localized at once in the right
iliac area, but it also may not be localized, but spreading all over the abdomen.
Approximately in a half of patients it locates at first it the epigastric area (Kocher —
Volkovich's sign), and only in 1-2 hours descends to the right iliac area. Sometimes this
symptom lasts for more prolonged time, and it considerably hampers differential
diagnosis. At the second stage of the disease, on developing of destructive changes in the
vermiform process, pain increases, causing the patients to suffer. The most severe pain is
in empyema, when pressure increases in the lumen of the vermiform process. In those
cases the patients rush about, they could not find a place for themselves. On the
background of constant pain a patient suddenly feels the increase of pain — perforating
9
symptom. But paradoxical reaction is rather frequent too, when during the process of
destruction pains subside up to their complete disappearance; this is associated with
gangrene of the vermiform appendix wall. Discrepancy of severe condition of the patient
and clinical picture is evident. At the third stage clinical picture of either appendicular
infiltrate or abscess or peritonitis is revealed.
Pain may radiate to different parts of the abdomen: to the umbilicus, to the
epigastric area, and to the loin. It depends on position of the caecum and the vermiform
process.
Nausea and vomiting is observed in 60 -80% of patients (V.I. Kolesov, 1972).
Nausea usually precedes vomiting, but sometimes it may be an independent symptom. It
is important that these symptoms do not ever precede pains, but arises during the first or
the second hour of the disease. At the first stage vomiting is of reflex nature, with mucous
and eaten food. At the second and third stages vomiting occurs again, but now its
frequency and nature depend predominantly upon expressiveness of peritonitis,
intoxication and developing dynamic (paralytic) intestinal insufficiency.
Gas and stools retention. They are immutable concomitants of acute appendicitis.
At the first stage of the disease retention of gas and stools occurs as physiologic, reflex
reaction to outside stimulants, but later it results from paralytic ileus in peritonitis. Loose
stools is rather infrequent, it may be observed mainly in children in case of spreading of
inflammatory process on the sigmoid colon or the large intestine. In case of pelvic
location of the vermiform appendix and its contiguity with the urinary bladder wall
disuric disturbances are possible.
At the onset of the disease temperature averages 37-38°C. Pulse rate corresponds to
the temperature-80 -100 beats per minute. Only in destructive forms of appendicitis
temperature may be 38,5-39°C, but tachycardia becomes 130 -140 beats per minute.
Thermometer readings under the armpit and into the rectum are to be compared because
of certain diagnostic importance. Revealing of considerable difference (over 1 /5°C)
objectively testifies an acute pathology in the abdomen.
Examination of the abdomen. At an onset of the disease the abdomen usually of
normal form, moves with breathing, symmetrical. In lean patients it is possible to notice
10
the lag of the right side of the abdomen in respiratory movements due to muscular strain
(Ivanov's symptom). In perforating of the vermiform appendix the respiratory
movements of the anterior abdominal wall disappear. In a man of athletic type it is
possible to notice the relief of strained abdominal muscles. Abdominal distention is the
late symptom. It testifies the development of peritonitis. Muscular tension (defanse
musculare) is the main symptom in acute appendicitis. In severe cases the site of the most
tenderness and local tension of the abdominal wall is in the right iliac area; the degree of
the muscular tension increases in accordance with intensity of the inflammatory process
inside the peritoneum. Revealing of the symptom requires a certain experience.
Infrequently the patient strains the abdominal wall by himself, preventing the pain,
especially if the investigation is carried out unskillfully and crudely. At the first stage of
the disease the muscular tension may be absent. It may be frequently observed in elder
and senile persons and in women with flabby and dilated abdominal wall, who had
experienced labors many times, and also at retrocaecal, retroperitoneal and pelvic
localization of the vermiform appendix.
Deep palpation of the most painful area is not expedient. It rarely gives additional
information, as it is usually prevented by muscular protection. But at soft abdomen deep
palpation allows to diagnose appendicular infiltrate, to determine its size and bounds,
consistency, mobility. Sometimes it is possible to feel the caecum, area of which is
always painful in case of acute appendicitis. But it is almost impossible to feel the
vermiform appendix, and it is not necessary. Revealing of painful points (McBurney's
point, points of Lanz and Kummel) is not of great diagnostic value. In acute appendicitis
tenderness of the abdomen is rarely strictly localized. Blumberg's sign (guarding
symptom) is a rebound tenderness symptom. Already at the early stage of acute
appendicitis, at mild catarrhal inflammation of the parietal peritoneum it is usually
positive. The following may check it. The tips of the fingers are introduced very gently
and gradually into the anterior abdominal wall, pressing it inside the abdomen. Then the
arm is abruptly taken away. In positive reaction the patient notes the increase of pain,
sometimes he shrivels and utters a scream.
Percussion of the abdomen allows to localize the area of the greatest tenderness
11
more precisely (Razdolsky's (abductor of femur sign). These are also rebound
tenderness symptoms. A slight percussion of the abdominal wall at its different sites is
enough to determine this symptom. By means of percussion, being oriented on the
dullness of the percussion sound it is easy to estimate the bounds of appendicular
infiltrate, and in peritonitis — the presence of fluid in sloping places of the abdomen.
Auscultation of the abdomen allows to estimate the intestinal peristalsis. Already at
an early stage of the disease it is weakened, but survives for a long time. The absence of
peristalsis is a threatening symptom of peritonitis.
Appendicular symptoms. More than 100 symptoms of appendicitis had been
already described. We shall settle on only on some of them, which are the most
pathognomonic, and gained popularity among the surgeons.
Sitkovsky's sign. A patient is asked to turn on his left side. If at that the pain in the
right iliac region arises, the symptom will be considered to be positive one.
Bartomye's symptom is checked as Sitkovsky's one, but at the same time palpation
of the right iliac region is performed. At positive symptom palpatory tenderness
increases.
Rovsing's symptom. In dorsal position of a patient, a surgeon presses the sigmoid
colon to the posterior abdominal wall with the fingertips of the left arm and fixes it.
Simultaneously, a little above, by means of balloting palpation, he shakes the abdominal
wall in the sigmoid area. The onset of pain in the right half of the abdomen is the
evidence of a positive symptom.
Voskresensky's symptom. A shirt or T-shirt of a patient is tightened with the left
arm and fixed at the pubis. By fingertips of the right arm a surgeon slightly presses to the
abdominal wall in the area of the xiphisternum, and at time of expiration performs a
quick uniform sliding motion at first towards the left iliac-inguinal region, and then to the
right one, but for all that the arm is held on the abdominal wall. In the presence of
positive symptom a patient feels pain in the right side.
It is also necessary to remember some other appendicular symptoms, such as
Corn's, Britten's, Chugaev's, Cope's, Dumbadze's, Rizvash's, Gabay's, Yaure-Rozanov's,
Punin's, Bulynin's, and Promptov's symptoms.
12
Laboratory Diagnosis
Moderate leukocytosis is noted at an early stage of the disease. In catarrhal form of
inflammation it is from 10xl09/l to 12xl09 /I, in destructive forms it achieves 14xl09/l-
18xl09/l, but sometimes it may be even higher, It is dangerous when neutrophilic shift of
differential blood count to the left takes place. The increase of stab neutrophil up to 10-
16% and appearance of juvenile forms is the evidence of high degree intoxication.
Laboratory investigations of the blood may be widened by examination of C-
reactive blood protein (C-RP), phagocyte activity of neutrophils, investigation of alkaline
phosphatase, peroxides, oxidase, and cytochrome oxidase. However, non-specific
character and considerable labor-consuming nature of these reactions decreases their
diagnostic value in urgent surgery. Urinary tests reveal pathologic changes in severe
intoxication and peritonitis.
In uncertain diagnosis of acute appendicitis, laparoscopy is of particular value;
approximately in 90% of cases it puts an end to doubt in diagnosis. Especially often the
necessity of laparoscopy occurs at differential diagnosis with genital diseases and renal
colic.
Complications in Acute Appendicitis
Appendicular infiltrate occurs in 0.9-2.9% of patients, who had been hospitalized in
48 hours and later from the onset of the disease with evident prevalence of elder and
senile patients.
Morphologic and clinical essence of infiltrate consists in the inflammatory focus in
the vermiform appendix is delimited from the free abdomen by the omentum, and the
adjacent tissues and organs, which are also involved in the inflammatory process, united
into one conglomerate, which is connected with the anterior, posterior or lateral
abdominal wall.
The size of infiltrate may be different, from small one, with the size of a fist, to the
giant one, occupying the whole right side of the abdomen. The boundaries of infiltrate, as
a rule, are distinct; their mobility is usually limited.
As a whole, it takes about 2-5 days to form appendicular infiltrate; during this
13
period it passes several stages (A.I. Krakovsky and co-authors, 1986):
1 . Loose infiltrate. In typical cases it is located in front of the caecum, with mild
peritoneal response, purulent exudate in the small pelvis, with involvement of the
caecum, phlegmonous or gangrenous appendicitis, omentum, and the loops of the small
intestine;
2. Dense infiltrate, which can be either resolved or form an abscess;
3. Periappendicular abscess.
Infrequently diagnosis is difficult. Before surgery it is possible to make a correct
diagnosis only in a half of patients. Sometimes there are quite forcible arguments, foe
example, atypical position of the vermiform appendix and, accordingly, of infiltrate in the
small pelvis or behind the caecum; excessive obesity of patients with abundant layer of
fatty tissue; impossibility of deep palpation due to acute tenderness and protective
muscular tension. Insufficiently careful and full-value investigation is the common reason
of diagnostic pitfall.
In typical cases the delimitation of the process in phlegmonous appendicitis without
any signs of perforation must coincide with gradual improvement of the patient's general
condition and control of acute manifestations. The pains gradually cease up to their
complete disappearance. Pulse becomes normal. Temperature decreases, but, however,
remains stably sub febrile. Signs of dynamic intestinal obstruction disappear rapidly.
Subsequent course of the disease may be different. Three variants are possible. The
most favorable one is resorbtion under the influence of conservative treatment. Usually it
takes approximately from 2 weeks to 1 month. The second variant is the most dangerous
of all, when peritonitis progresses simultaneously with the process of infiltrate formation.
And, finally, the third variant — infiltrate abscess formation, when in the presence of
obviously localized process, clinical manifestations of purulent septic process are
evident: increase of pain in the infiltrate area, hectic fever with chills, and intoxication.
General Appendicular Peritonitis
Difficulties and dangers of acute appendicitis at common appendicular peritonitis
14
reach the apogee. Incidence of this complication averages from 0,6 to 4,1%. It is
necessary to note, that among the causes of common peritonitis acute appendicitis takes
the first position, achieving 50-55% (A.A. Shalimov, 1990). Clinical picture, diagnosis
and treatment of common peritonitis are expounded in the appropriate lecture.
Pilephlebitis
Purulent trombophlebitis in the region of the superior mesenteric or portal vein is
one of the most severe complications of acute appendicitis. It occurs rather seldom, in
0,06-1,5% of cases from general number of patients with this disease. The course of the
disease is exclusively severe; with fatal outcome in most cases. In 1986 V.S. Savelyev
advanced the opinion that there were no reliable observations of pilephlebitis.
Information of N.V. Karamanov about successful treatment of 11 patients with
pilephlebitis seems to be more optimistic. Timeliness diagnostics is a guarantee of
success. Appearance on the background acute appendicitis clinical picture such
symptoms as chill, hectic fever, pain in the right hypochondrium, jaundice, etc., including
laboratory data, proving severe intoxication, must put a surgeon on his guard.
Treatment of Acute Appendicitis
Treatment is only operative; there is no choice. Delay of operation is dangerous by
impetuous course of the process and development of the severest complications. The only
contraindication for operation is the presence of dense appendicular infiltrate but only in
those cases when there is no signs of abscess formation and peritonitis.
Being dependable on clinical situation, the operation may be performed both under
local and general anesthesia. General anesthesia is preferable. Three main approaches to
the vermiform appendix are used: oblique (Volkovich-Dyakonov's), Lenander's
(pararectal) incisions, and midline laparotomy.
In all cases of acute appendicitis with strictly localized clinical picture in the right
iliac fossa an oblique incision is applied. At typical position of the caecum and in other
positions of the vermiform appendix, optimal conditions are produced due to this
incision.
Pararectal Lenander's incision is applied in case of vague diagnosis. It may be
15
rapidly elongated up and downwards. But in case of retrocaecal position of the appendix
and at local periappendicular abscesses Leander’s incision is not so suitable.
Mid-midline or low-midline laparotomy is applied in the presence of clinical signs
of diffuse and general peritonitis.
Operation technique for appendectomy is identical on principle in various forms of
inflammation of the vermiform appendix, but each of them introduces its own features
and a number of additional tricks in performance of operation. In catarrhal appendicitis
before performance of operation it is necessary to make certain that visible morphological
changes correspond to clinical picture of the disease and are not the secondary ones. In
phlegmonous appendicitis, having evacuated the exudates from the right iliac fossa, it is
necessary to determine that the process inside the abdomen is localized; for this purpose
the surgeon examines the right lateral canal, right mesenteric sinus and cavity of the
small pelvis by means of a swab. If muddy exudate appears from these spaces of the
lower abdomen, it is necessary to suggest diffuse or general peritonitis. At the beginning
of operation for appendectomy of gangrenous appendix it is necessary to delimit carefully
the area of the iliocaecal angle from the other portions of the abdominal cavity by means
of wide gauze towels. In case of perforation, one should thoroughly wrap the vermiform
appendix with wet towel, avoiding the appearance of intestinal content inside the
abdominal cavity. Operation in conditions of appendicular infiltrate is fraught with many
dangers. In such a case it is necessary to exhibit a particular wisdom. It is on these
conditions that excessive activity of the surgeon may result in a number of serious
complications and in the growth of lethality (diffuse peritonitis, sepsis, intestinal fistula,
thromboembolism, bleedings).
Retrograde appendectomy is performed in those cases, when it becomes impossible
to draw out both the caecum and appendix into the wound due to adhesions and
inflammatory infiltration.
Ligation of the mesentery applying a purse-string suture and treatment of the
appendicle stump are the most important stages of appendectomy. It is prohibited to be in
hurry. Everything must be done carefully and safely. It is these stages of operation that
may result in such complications as postoperative abdominal hemorrhages, postoperative
16
peritonitis, intestinal fistula, abdominal abscess, etc.
This is the end of our lecture for problem of acute appendicitis. Many particular
problems of this surgical disease were mentioned only in passing, and some of them did
not touched at all. An interested reader will find answers on his questions in
recommended special literature.
17