Download - Adaptable Housing Thesis Project
ADAPTABILITYIn housIng
Christophergebhardthousing Terminal studio
Prof. Michael Fifield Winter-spring 2014
“Architecture that is designed for adaptation recognizes that the future is not finite, that change is inevitable, but that a framework is an important element in allowing that change to happen.”-Kronenburg, Flexible: Architecture That Responds to Change.9 9
RAUSCH9 9
RAUSCH
The available data on residential mobility within the U.S. shows that people move for a wide variety of reasons, but analysis of those reasons shows that there are general trends and commonalities that can allow a designer to address issues that will be relevant for a large number of people. For example, 62% of local moves are made for housing related reasons, 26% are made for family related issues.
Regardless of the specific reason, the decision to move is about the need for change. Since buildings are generally considered static and permanent, change in a life situation usually means moving to a different building. The fundamental premise of this project is that when people need change, instead of them needing to move to different housing, their current housing should be able to change, or adapt, to meet their new needs.
This project is an exploration of the ability of a building to adapt to meet the changing needs of its inhabitants. It will explore the issues surrounding residential mobility in America. What is it that makes so many of us pick up our roots and set them down in a new location? How many of the needs that drive people to do this can be met by thoughtful and innovative housing design? Can we enjoy the benefits of a community we have invested ourselves in while also having housing that works for our current life circumstances?
sTATIsTICs
SITe SIze:
BUIldIng Type:
nUmBeR oF UnITS:
UnIT denSITy:
UnIT TypeS:
CommeRCIAl SpACe:
99 Rausch st. san Francisco, CA (soMA District)
.75 ACReS
mId-RISe ReSIdenTIAl/mIxed-USe 66 UnITS 88 d.U./A.
STUdIoS, 1 And 2 BedRoom FlATS, 3 BedRoom UnITS
2600ft2
Housing-Related Reasons
Family-Related Reasons
Work-Related Reasons
Other
Local Moves
Internal Migration Immigration
New/Better House
Cheaper Housing
Better Neighborhood
Wanted to Own Home
Other housing reason
Change in Marital Status
Establish Own Household
Other Family Reason
New Job/Job Transfer - 0%
Retired
Closer to Work/Commute
Look for Work/Lost Job
Other Job Related Reason
Housing-Related Reasons Family-Related ReasonsWork-Related Reasons
Attend College
Health Reasons
Change of Climate
Other Reasons
Other Reasons
Quality Issues 30.6%
Quantity Issues 25.9%
Other Issues 41.4%
This study divides the reasons for moving into three catagories: issues involving the quality of the housing situation, the quantity or square footage of the housing situation, and “other” issues such as those having to do with location or ownership type.
New/Better HouseBetter NeighborhoodHealth Reasons (Accessibility)
Change in Marital StatusEstablish Own HouseholdLook for Work/Lost JobRetiredCheaper Housing
Closer to Work/CommuteWanted to Own HomeAttend CollegeChange of ClimateOther Family ReasonOther Job Related ReasonOther Housing ReasonOther Reasons
24.4%4.8%1.4%
7.0%9.5%0.5%0.2%8.7%
3.4%12.2%
1.8%0.2%9.8%0.4%
11.7%1.9%
41.4%
30.6%
25.9%
Type Analysis: Local Moves
All data from: Donald J. Bogue, “Why Americans Move,” in Immigration, Internal Migration, and Local Mobility in the U.S., ed. Donald J. Bogue, Gregory Leigel, and Michael Kozloski (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2009), 30–58.
Total does not equal 100 due to rounding in each catagory
Design Responses
Quality Issues - Addressed through good design in this project and the possibility for units’ facade interfaces to be upgraded
Quantity Issues - Addressed through the ability of the units to be reconfigured, expanded, or shrunk by either the developer or the occupant.
Other IssuesThe scope of this project is limited to issues that can be addressed in a single housing development. The designer recognizes that there are many reasons for residential mobility that cannot be addressed in this project.
Reasons for Moving by Type of Mobility, 2005
Reason For Moving Total Mobile Local Mobility Internal Migration Immigration
All Movers 100 100 100 100
Family-Related Reasons 27.1 26.3 29.3 19.6Change in Marital Status 7.1 7 7.8 3.4Establish Own Household 7.8 9.5 5.7 3.5Other Family Reason 12.2 9.8 15.8 12.7
Work-Related Reasons 17.6 4.4 29.3 55.1New Job/Job Transfer 10.4 0 20 30.5Look for Work/Lost Job 1.9 0.5 2.4 15Closer to Work/Commute 3.4 3.3 3.9 1.3Retired 0.5 0.2 1 0.4Other Job Related Reason 1.4 0.4 2 7.9
Housing-Related Reasons 47.1 61.8 29.9 9.9Wanted to Own Home 9.3 12.2 5.9 1.4New/Better House 17.8 24.4 9.7 3.4Better Neighborhood 4 4.8 3.3 0.4Cheaper Housing 6.6 8.7 4.2 1.2Other housing reason 9.4 11.7 6.8 3.5
Other Reasons 8 5.3 11.3 15.4Attend College 3.2 1.8 4.9 6.5Change of Climate 0.6 0.2 1.3 0.1Health Reasons 1.6 1.4 2 1Other Reasons 2.6 1.9 3.1 7.8
Why Americans Move
Shiftable Units Subdividable Units Reconfigurable Units
Pedestrian Friendly Street Edge Accessible UnitsGood Neighborhood
Housing-Related Reasons
Family-Related Reasons
Work-Related Reasons
Other
Local Moves
Internal Migration Immigration
New/Better House
Cheaper Housing
Better Neighborhood
Wanted to Own Home
Other housing reason
Change in Marital Status
Establish Own Household
Other Family Reason
New Job/Job Transfer - 0%
Retired
Closer to Work/Commute
Look for Work/Lost Job
Other Job Related Reason
Housing-Related Reasons Family-Related ReasonsWork-Related Reasons
Attend College
Health Reasons
Change of Climate
Other Reasons
Other Reasons
Quality Issues 30.6%
Quantity Issues 25.9%
Other Issues 41.4%
This study divides the reasons for moving into three catagories: issues involving the quality of the housing situation, the quantity or square footage of the housing situation, and “other” issues such as those having to do with location or ownership type.
New/Better HouseBetter NeighborhoodHealth Reasons (Accessibility)
Change in Marital StatusEstablish Own HouseholdLook for Work/Lost JobRetiredCheaper Housing
Closer to Work/CommuteWanted to Own HomeAttend CollegeChange of ClimateOther Family ReasonOther Job Related ReasonOther Housing ReasonOther Reasons
24.4%4.8%1.4%
7.0%9.5%0.5%0.2%8.7%
3.4%12.2%
1.8%0.2%9.8%0.4%
11.7%1.9%
41.4%
30.6%
25.9%
Type Analysis: Local Moves
All data from: Donald J. Bogue, “Why Americans Move,” in Immigration, Internal Migration, and Local Mobility in the U.S., ed. Donald J. Bogue, Gregory Leigel, and Michael Kozloski (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2009), 30–58.
Total does not equal 100 due to rounding in each catagory
Design Responses
Quality Issues - Addressed through good design in this project and the possibility for units’ facade interfaces to be upgraded
Quantity Issues - Addressed through the ability of the units to be reconfigured, expanded, or shrunk by either the developer or the occupant.
Other IssuesThe scope of this project is limited to issues that can be addressed in a single housing development. The designer recognizes that there are many reasons for residential mobility that cannot be addressed in this project.
Reasons for Moving by Type of Mobility, 2005
Reason For Moving Total Mobile Local Mobility Internal Migration Immigration
All Movers 100 100 100 100
Family-Related Reasons 27.1 26.3 29.3 19.6Change in Marital Status 7.1 7 7.8 3.4Establish Own Household 7.8 9.5 5.7 3.5Other Family Reason 12.2 9.8 15.8 12.7
Work-Related Reasons 17.6 4.4 29.3 55.1New Job/Job Transfer 10.4 0 20 30.5Look for Work/Lost Job 1.9 0.5 2.4 15Closer to Work/Commute 3.4 3.3 3.9 1.3Retired 0.5 0.2 1 0.4Other Job Related Reason 1.4 0.4 2 7.9
Housing-Related Reasons 47.1 61.8 29.9 9.9Wanted to Own Home 9.3 12.2 5.9 1.4New/Better House 17.8 24.4 9.7 3.4Better Neighborhood 4 4.8 3.3 0.4Cheaper Housing 6.6 8.7 4.2 1.2Other housing reason 9.4 11.7 6.8 3.5
Other Reasons 8 5.3 11.3 15.4Attend College 3.2 1.8 4.9 6.5Change of Climate 0.6 0.2 1.3 0.1Health Reasons 1.6 1.4 2 1Other Reasons 2.6 1.9 3.1 7.8
Why Americans Move
Shiftable Units Subdividable Units Reconfigurable Units
Pedestrian Friendly Street Edge Accessible UnitsGood Neighborhood
Housing-Related Reasons
Family-Related Reasons
Work-Related Reasons
Other
Local Moves
Internal Migration Immigration
New/Better House
Cheaper Housing
Better Neighborhood
Wanted to Own Home
Other housing reason
Change in Marital Status
Establish Own Household
Other Family Reason
New Job/Job Transfer - 0%
Retired
Closer to Work/Commute
Look for Work/Lost Job
Other Job Related Reason
Housing-Related Reasons Family-Related ReasonsWork-Related Reasons
Attend College
Health Reasons
Change of Climate
Other Reasons
Other Reasons
Quality Issues 30.6%
Quantity Issues 25.9%
Other Issues 41.4%
This study divides the reasons for moving into three catagories: issues involving the quality of the housing situation, the quantity or square footage of the housing situation, and “other” issues such as those having to do with location or ownership type.
New/Better HouseBetter NeighborhoodHealth Reasons (Accessibility)
Change in Marital StatusEstablish Own HouseholdLook for Work/Lost JobRetiredCheaper Housing
Closer to Work/CommuteWanted to Own HomeAttend CollegeChange of ClimateOther Family ReasonOther Job Related ReasonOther Housing ReasonOther Reasons
24.4%4.8%1.4%
7.0%9.5%0.5%0.2%8.7%
3.4%12.2%
1.8%0.2%9.8%0.4%
11.7%1.9%
41.4%
30.6%
25.9%
Type Analysis: Local Moves
All data from: Donald J. Bogue, “Why Americans Move,” in Immigration, Internal Migration, and Local Mobility in the U.S., ed. Donald J. Bogue, Gregory Leigel, and Michael Kozloski (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2009), 30–58.
Total does not equal 100 due to rounding in each catagory
Design Responses
Quality Issues - Addressed through good design in this project and the possibility for units’ facade interfaces to be upgraded
Quantity Issues - Addressed through the ability of the units to be reconfigured, expanded, or shrunk by either the developer or the occupant.
Other IssuesThe scope of this project is limited to issues that can be addressed in a single housing development. The designer recognizes that there are many reasons for residential mobility that cannot be addressed in this project.
Reasons for Moving by Type of Mobility, 2005
Reason For Moving Total Mobile Local Mobility Internal Migration Immigration
All Movers 100 100 100 100
Family-Related Reasons 27.1 26.3 29.3 19.6Change in Marital Status 7.1 7 7.8 3.4Establish Own Household 7.8 9.5 5.7 3.5Other Family Reason 12.2 9.8 15.8 12.7
Work-Related Reasons 17.6 4.4 29.3 55.1New Job/Job Transfer 10.4 0 20 30.5Look for Work/Lost Job 1.9 0.5 2.4 15Closer to Work/Commute 3.4 3.3 3.9 1.3Retired 0.5 0.2 1 0.4Other Job Related Reason 1.4 0.4 2 7.9
Housing-Related Reasons 47.1 61.8 29.9 9.9Wanted to Own Home 9.3 12.2 5.9 1.4New/Better House 17.8 24.4 9.7 3.4Better Neighborhood 4 4.8 3.3 0.4Cheaper Housing 6.6 8.7 4.2 1.2Other housing reason 9.4 11.7 6.8 3.5
Other Reasons 8 5.3 11.3 15.4Attend College 3.2 1.8 4.9 6.5Change of Climate 0.6 0.2 1.3 0.1Health Reasons 1.6 1.4 2 1Other Reasons 2.6 1.9 3.1 7.8
Why Americans Move
Shiftable Units Subdividable Units Reconfigurable Units
Pedestrian Friendly Street Edge Accessible UnitsGood Neighborhood
Housing-Related Reasons
Family-Related Reasons
Work-Related Reasons
Other
Local Moves
Internal Migration Immigration
New/Better House
Cheaper Housing
Better Neighborhood
Wanted to Own Home
Other housing reason
Change in Marital Status
Establish Own Household
Other Family Reason
New Job/Job Transfer - 0%
Retired
Closer to Work/Commute
Look for Work/Lost Job
Other Job Related Reason
Housing-Related Reasons Family-Related ReasonsWork-Related Reasons
Attend College
Health Reasons
Change of Climate
Other Reasons
Other Reasons
Quality Issues 30.6%
Quantity Issues 25.9%
Other Issues 41.4%
This study divides the reasons for moving into three catagories: issues involving the quality of the housing situation, the quantity or square footage of the housing situation, and “other” issues such as those having to do with location or ownership type.
New/Better HouseBetter NeighborhoodHealth Reasons (Accessibility)
Change in Marital StatusEstablish Own HouseholdLook for Work/Lost JobRetiredCheaper Housing
Closer to Work/CommuteWanted to Own HomeAttend CollegeChange of ClimateOther Family ReasonOther Job Related ReasonOther Housing ReasonOther Reasons
24.4%4.8%1.4%
7.0%9.5%0.5%0.2%8.7%
3.4%12.2%
1.8%0.2%9.8%0.4%
11.7%1.9%
41.4%
30.6%
25.9%
Type Analysis: Local Moves
All data from: Donald J. Bogue, “Why Americans Move,” in Immigration, Internal Migration, and Local Mobility in the U.S., ed. Donald J. Bogue, Gregory Leigel, and Michael Kozloski (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2009), 30–58.
Total does not equal 100 due to rounding in each catagory
Design Responses
Quality Issues - Addressed through good design in this project and the possibility for units’ facade interfaces to be upgraded
Quantity Issues - Addressed through the ability of the units to be reconfigured, expanded, or shrunk by either the developer or the occupant.
Other IssuesThe scope of this project is limited to issues that can be addressed in a single housing development. The designer recognizes that there are many reasons for residential mobility that cannot be addressed in this project.
Reasons for Moving by Type of Mobility, 2005
Reason For Moving Total Mobile Local Mobility Internal Migration Immigration
All Movers 100 100 100 100
Family-Related Reasons 27.1 26.3 29.3 19.6Change in Marital Status 7.1 7 7.8 3.4Establish Own Household 7.8 9.5 5.7 3.5Other Family Reason 12.2 9.8 15.8 12.7
Work-Related Reasons 17.6 4.4 29.3 55.1New Job/Job Transfer 10.4 0 20 30.5Look for Work/Lost Job 1.9 0.5 2.4 15Closer to Work/Commute 3.4 3.3 3.9 1.3Retired 0.5 0.2 1 0.4Other Job Related Reason 1.4 0.4 2 7.9
Housing-Related Reasons 47.1 61.8 29.9 9.9Wanted to Own Home 9.3 12.2 5.9 1.4New/Better House 17.8 24.4 9.7 3.4Better Neighborhood 4 4.8 3.3 0.4Cheaper Housing 6.6 8.7 4.2 1.2Other housing reason 9.4 11.7 6.8 3.5
Other Reasons 8 5.3 11.3 15.4Attend College 3.2 1.8 4.9 6.5Change of Climate 0.6 0.2 1.3 0.1Health Reasons 1.6 1.4 2 1Other Reasons 2.6 1.9 3.1 7.8
Why Americans Move
Shiftable Units Subdividable Units Reconfigurable Units
Pedestrian Friendly Street Edge Accessible UnitsGood Neighborhood
Housing-Related Reasons
Family-Related Reasons
Work-Related Reasons
Other
Local Moves
Internal Migration Immigration
New/Better House
Cheaper Housing
Better Neighborhood
Wanted to Own Home
Other housing reason
Change in Marital Status
Establish Own Household
Other Family Reason
New Job/Job Transfer - 0%
Retired
Closer to Work/Commute
Look for Work/Lost Job
Other Job Related Reason
Housing-Related Reasons Family-Related ReasonsWork-Related Reasons
Attend College
Health Reasons
Change of Climate
Other Reasons
Other Reasons
Quality Issues 30.6%
Quantity Issues 25.9%
Other Issues 41.4%
This study divides the reasons for moving into three catagories: issues involving the quality of the housing situation, the quantity or square footage of the housing situation, and “other” issues such as those having to do with location or ownership type.
New/Better HouseBetter NeighborhoodHealth Reasons (Accessibility)
Change in Marital StatusEstablish Own HouseholdLook for Work/Lost JobRetiredCheaper Housing
Closer to Work/CommuteWanted to Own HomeAttend CollegeChange of ClimateOther Family ReasonOther Job Related ReasonOther Housing ReasonOther Reasons
24.4%4.8%1.4%
7.0%9.5%0.5%0.2%8.7%
3.4%12.2%
1.8%0.2%9.8%0.4%
11.7%1.9%
41.4%
30.6%
25.9%
Type Analysis: Local Moves
All data from: Donald J. Bogue, “Why Americans Move,” in Immigration, Internal Migration, and Local Mobility in the U.S., ed. Donald J. Bogue, Gregory Leigel, and Michael Kozloski (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2009), 30–58.
Total does not equal 100 due to rounding in each catagory
Design Responses
Quality Issues - Addressed through good design in this project and the possibility for units’ facade interfaces to be upgraded
Quantity Issues - Addressed through the ability of the units to be reconfigured, expanded, or shrunk by either the developer or the occupant.
Other IssuesThe scope of this project is limited to issues that can be addressed in a single housing development. The designer recognizes that there are many reasons for residential mobility that cannot be addressed in this project.
Reasons for Moving by Type of Mobility, 2005
Reason For Moving Total Mobile Local Mobility Internal Migration Immigration
All Movers 100 100 100 100
Family-Related Reasons 27.1 26.3 29.3 19.6Change in Marital Status 7.1 7 7.8 3.4Establish Own Household 7.8 9.5 5.7 3.5Other Family Reason 12.2 9.8 15.8 12.7
Work-Related Reasons 17.6 4.4 29.3 55.1New Job/Job Transfer 10.4 0 20 30.5Look for Work/Lost Job 1.9 0.5 2.4 15Closer to Work/Commute 3.4 3.3 3.9 1.3Retired 0.5 0.2 1 0.4Other Job Related Reason 1.4 0.4 2 7.9
Housing-Related Reasons 47.1 61.8 29.9 9.9Wanted to Own Home 9.3 12.2 5.9 1.4New/Better House 17.8 24.4 9.7 3.4Better Neighborhood 4 4.8 3.3 0.4Cheaper Housing 6.6 8.7 4.2 1.2Other housing reason 9.4 11.7 6.8 3.5
Other Reasons 8 5.3 11.3 15.4Attend College 3.2 1.8 4.9 6.5Change of Climate 0.6 0.2 1.3 0.1Health Reasons 1.6 1.4 2 1Other Reasons 2.6 1.9 3.1 7.8
Why Americans Move
Shiftable Units Subdividable Units Reconfigurable Units
Pedestrian Friendly Street Edge Accessible UnitsGood Neighborhood
sITe FeATuRes: .3 mIleS FRom BART.1 mIleS FRom Bus LInes.2 mIleS FRom 10 CARshARes .1 mIleS FRom 2 PARks.2 mIleS FRom 2 suPeRMARkeTs
soMA District, san FranciscoCLIMATe Wind Rose
Psychrometric Chart
Monthly Temperatures
data from U.S. department of energy and Climate Consultant 5.4
UP
DN
DN
DN
DN
DN
DN
DN
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
Office
Retail
Laundry
Resident
Services
Trash
Bike Parking
Mech.
Elec.
ExitLoading
19.1
17.4
22.6
21.4
20.6Floor 1
Rausch St. Folsom
St.
A
B
0’ 5’ 10’ 20’
1/16” = 1’0’ 10’ 20’ 40’
1/8” = 1’
0’ 5’ 10’1/4” = 1’
1/2” = 1’0’ 5’1’ 3’
0’
5’
15’
35’32nd
16th0’ 5’ 15’10’
DN
UP
UP
UP
DN
DNUP
UP
DN
DNUP
UP
DN
DN
Housing Plan Floors 2 and 3
A
B
UP
DN
DN
DNUP
UP
DN
UP
DN
UP
Housing Plan Floors 4 and 5
Roof Deck
Emergency Egress
A
B
0’
5’
15’
35’32nd
16th0’ 5’ 15’10’
0’ 5’ 10’ 20’
1/16” = 1’0’ 10’ 20’ 40’
1/8” = 1’
0’ 5’ 10’1/4” = 1’
1/2” = 1’0’ 5’1’ 3’
Section A: facing northwest Section B: facing northeast
0’ 10’ 20’ 0’ 10’ 20’
Section A: facing northwest Section B: facing northeast
0’ 10’ 20’ 0’ 10’ 20’
1/8" = 1'-0"
One Bedroom Pair
1/8" = 1'-0"
Two Bedroom and Studio632sf each 817sf and 475sf
0’ 5’ 10’ 20’
1/16” = 1’0’ 10’ 20’ 40’
1/8” = 1’
0’ 5’ 10’1/4” = 1’
1/2” = 1’0’ 5’1’ 3’
one Bedroom Adaptability
1/8" = 1'-0"
Two Bedroom
1/8" = 1'-0"
One Bedroom w/ Expanded Living Space967sf 967sf
12’ O
pen
ing
= 3
Sh
eets
of
Dry
wal
l
1/8" = 1'-0"
Two Bedroom
1/8" = 1'-0"
One Bedroom w/ Expanded Living Space967sf 967sf
12’ O
pen
ing
= 3
Sh
eets
of
Dry
wal
l
0’ 5’ 10’ 20’
1/16” = 1’0’ 10’ 20’ 40’
1/8” = 1’
0’ 5’ 10’1/4” = 1’
1/2” = 1’0’ 5’1’ 3’
Two Bedroom Adaptability
680 and 796 sf
796 and 680 sf 1/8" = 1'-0"
2x1 Bedroom and Three BedroomConfigurations
1/8" = 1'-0"Three Bedroom Lower Floors
0’ 5’ 10’ 20’
1/16” = 1’0’ 10’ 20’ 40’
1/8” = 1’
0’ 5’ 10’1/4” = 1’
1/2” = 1’0’ 5’1’ 3’
680 and 796 sf
796 and 680 sf 1/8" = 1'-0"
2x1 Bedroom and Three BedroomConfigurations
1/8" = 1'-0"Three Bedroom Lower Floors
Three Bedroom Adaptability
Fully Shaded
Partially Shaded
Vertically Shaded
Open Position
Shading Position
Full Balcony
Juliet Balcony
Double Facade
Solid Panels
Window Adaptations
Ideal World Real World
Panels that easily clip onto the mullion system allow users to adapt to seasonal changes in desired solar access while also customizing their unit’s interaction with the outdoors through visual access or upgrades such as larger balconies.
Shades slide on simple tracks concealed in joints between wall panels, allowing the users to cutomize solar access without requiring any installation or uninstallation.
Window Adaptations
nighteveningMorning
Hopper Window
Sliding ExteriorSun-shades
Awning Window
Inward OpeningCasement Windows
Spandrel Panel
Track Concealedin Panel Seam
Juliet BalconyRailing
Floor Level
Window Operability
Possible Removable Panelfor Full Door
one Bedroom Adaptability
0’ 5’ 10’ 20’
1/16” = 1’0’ 10’ 20’ 40’
1/8” = 1’
0’ 5’ 10’1/4” = 1’
1/2” = 1’0’ 5’1’ 3’
Facade Adaptability
Back Yard Social Node
1/8" = 1'-0"
Section - Back Yard Social Node
1/8" = 1'-0"
Back Yard Social Node
1/8" = 1'-0"
Section - Back Yard Social Node
1/8" = 1'-0"
Plan
section0’ 5’ 10’ 20’
1/16” = 1’0’ 10’ 20’ 40’
1/8” = 1’
0’ 5’ 10’1/4” = 1’
1/2” = 1’0’ 5’1’ 3’
Courtyard social node
Courtyard social node
DN
Scale
Project number
Date
Drawn by
Checked by 1/8" = 1'-0"
5/22/2014 7:08:55 PM
A304
Outdoor Spaces 2W14
3 March 2014
Author
Checker 1/8" = 1'-0"
1Roof Deck
2Roof Deck Iso
Scale
Project number
Date
Drawn by
Checked by 1/8" = 1'-0"
5/29/2014 3:41:25 PM
A305
Outdoor Spaces 3W14
3 March 2014
Author
Checker
1/8" = 1'-0"Roof Deck Section
Plan
section
0’ 5’ 10’ 20’
1/16” = 1’0’ 10’ 20’ 40’
1/8” = 1’
0’ 5’ 10’1/4” = 1’
1/2” = 1’0’ 5’1’ 3’
Roof Deck
Roof Deck
Folsom St. Edge Rausch St. Edge
Ground Level0' - 0"
Level 215' - 0"
Level 325' - 0"
Ground Level0' - 0"
Level 215' - 0"
Level 12' - 0"
Level 325' - 0"
Folsom St. Edge Rausch St. Edge
Ground Level0' - 0"
Level 215' - 0"
Level 325' - 0"
Ground Level0' - 0"
Level 215' - 0"
Level 12' - 0"
Level 325' - 0"
Folsom st. edge
Rausch st. edge
0’ 5’ 10’ 20’
1/16” = 1’0’ 10’ 20’ 40’
1/8” = 1’
0’ 5’ 10’1/4” = 1’
1/2” = 1’0’ 5’1’ 3’
Rausch street
street edge
I would like to thank my professor, michael Fifield, for all his help and guidance over the course of this project, as well as david Israel and BAR Architects for their generous contributions of time and money that allowed this studio to be so much more than a typical two-term project.
Thanks also to my parents who supported and encouraged me through all my many years of schooling, as well as the great friends I have made through the years for making it such an enjoyable process.
I definitely couldn’t have done it without you all.
-Christopher gebhardtB.Arch. Spring 2014
University of oregon