![Page 1: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
PROCEEDINGS
Agriculture,FoodSecurityandNutritioninNepal‐TakingStockandDefiningPriorities
NUTRITIONCOLLABORATIVERESEARCH
SUPPORTPROGRAM:
SCIENTIFICSYMPOSIUM
March21‐22,2012
AUTHORS:
SUDEEPSHRESTHA
SWETHAMANOHAR
ROLFKLEMM
RAPPORTEURS:
DIPLAVSAPKOTA
AKRITISINGH
RAMANSHRESTHA
SUDEEPSHRESTHA
DISCLAIMER:Theauthors’viewsexpressedinthispublicationdonotnecessarilyreflecttheviewsoftheUnitedStatesAgencyforInternationalDevelopmentortheUnitedStatesGovernment.
![Page 2: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
TABLEOFCONTENTS
AbouttheNutritionCollaborativeResearchSupportProgram(NutritionCRSP)......................4
Acknowledgements.......................................................................................................................................................4
ExecutiveSummary.......................................................................................................................................................5
ProgramataGlance......................................................................................................................................................9
Opening..............................................................................................................................................................................12
SymposiumKeynoteAddress.................................................................................................................................14
Roleofevidenceinleveragingagricultureforimprovedhealthandnutrition
Session1............................................................................................................................................................................23
Agriculturetomarkets..................................................................................................................................................23
Session2...........................................................................................................................................................................27
LinkingFoodMarketsand/orHomeProductiontoHouseholdAccess....................................................27
Session3...........................................................................................................................................................................31
HouseholdAvailability,AccessandUsetoDietaryIntakeandNutritionandHealthOutcomesofWomenandYoungChildren.......................................................................................................................................31
Session 4.............................................................................................................................................................................33
Identifying,Defining,MeasuringLinkagesandEvidenceGaps....................................................................33
NextSteps.........................................................................................................................................................................40
APPENDIX.........................................................................................................................................................................42
Session1‐Abstracts....................................................................................................................................................42
1.1HouseholdConsumptionofGrainLegumesinNepalTerai:AStudyonImpactofImprovedTechnoglogies.RKNeupane,NSThakur,PJha,DNPokharel,BPMahatoandRASah.................42
1.2EfficienciesinLinkingAgriculturalDevelopmentwithHealthandNutritionTraininginNepal.L.ColavitoandM.Pariyar.......................................................................................................................................43
1.3HighImpactTechnologiesApproachesforImprovedFoodSecurityandNutritionofRuralPoor.JoeSanders.......................................................................................................................................................44
Session2‐Abstracts....................................................................................................................................................45
2.1ApplicationoftheHouseholdEconomyApproachforAssessingFoodSecurityandDescribingLivelihoodsinNepal.SavilleNM1,AkhterN1,ShresthaBP2,ManandharDS,OsrinD,CostelloA........................................................................................................................................................................................45
2.2HomesteadFoodProductioncontributestoDietaryIntakeofChildren6‐23montholdsinKailaliDistrict,FarWestTerai.DPAdhikari,PPandeyRana1,DDavis,NSharma,HBChand,RKNeupane..................................................................................................................................................................46
2.3FoodSecurity,FoodPriceandIncomeTrendsinDhanushaDistrict,Nepalbetween2005and2011.ShresthaBP,AkhterN,ManandharDS,OsrinD,CostelloA,SavilleNM................................47
2.4ValidatingDistrict‐LevelAssessmentwithSurveyData:ExamplefromtheNEKASP,WorldFoodProgramme.......................................................................................................................................................48
![Page 3: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Session3‐Abstracts...................................................................................................................................................49
3.1NutritionInterventionthatImproveChildandMaternalHealthandSurvivalFindingsfromTrialsintheTeraiofNepal(Expandedabstract)KeithP.West,Jr.,SubarnaK.Khatry,ParulChristian,RolfD.W.Klemm,JoanneKatz,LukeMullany,StevenC.LeClerq,JamesM.Tielsch.49
3.2GrowthandHealthofRuralChildrenin3districtsofNepal:EffectofaCommunityDevelopmentIntervention.LCMiller,RShrestha,MLohani,PSingh,PSubba,DThapa,SNMahato,NJoshi.........................................................................................................................................................52
3.3ImpactsofChangesinGrainPulse(legume)ConsumptiononMicronutrientSupplyofRuralWomeninNepalAndNorthIndia.PAndersen...........................................................................................53
3.4CorrelatesofInfantandYoungChildFeedingPracticesinChepangCommunity.SubediN,PoudelS,RanaTandPaudelAK........................................................................................................................54
TitleListingsforPosterPresentations...................................................................................................................55
ListofParticipants.............................................................................................................................................................56
References..............................................................................................................................................................................61
![Page 4: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
ABOUTTHENUTRITIONCOLLABORATIVERESEARCHSUPPORTPROGRAM(NUTRITIONCRSP)
TheUSGovernment’supcoming‘FeedtheFuture’initiativesupportsanewparadigmthatlinksagriculturewithhealthstrategiestoaddressundernutritionindevelopingcountries.Thisintegratedapproachaimstoprovidelongtermandsustainablesolutionstoundernutritionbyaddressingitsdeterminants.TheNutritionCRSPwillworkwithUSAIDmissions,developmentpartnersandhostcountriesthroughthe‘FeedtheFutureImplementationPlanandFoodSecurityCountryInvestmentPlans’todeterminethekindsofinvestmentsinagriculture,healthandnutrition,institutionalandhumancapacitydevelopmentandpolicydevelopmentneededtoachievelargescaleimprovementsinanation'shealth.TheNutritionCRSPisaprogramof‘research‐to‐practice’thatsupportshumanandinstitutionalcapacitybuildingforresearchandpolicyanalysisinhostcountries,inpartnershipwithlocaluniversities,researchorganizations,andcentersofpolicyformulationwithinthegovernment.ItwaslaunchedinOctober2010,andismanagedbytheFriedmanSchoolofNutritionScienceandPolicyatTuftsUniversity,inpartnershipwiththeSchoolsofPublicHealthatJohnsHopkinsUniversityandHarvard,theCollegeofAgricultureatPurdueUniversity,theCollegeofAgricultural,Environmental,andNaturalSciencesatTuskegeeUniversity,DevelopmentAlternativesInc.,theUSAIDBureauforFoodSecurityandUSAIDmissionsinFeedtheFuturefocuscountries.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
WegratefullyacknowledgethesupportoftheUnitedStatesAgencyforInternationalDevelopment(USAID)forprovidingthefundstosupportthisscientificsymposiumandproceedings.Specialthanksgototheco‐hostsofthesymposium,theDepartmentofCommunityMedicineandPublicHealthatInstituteofMedicine(IOM)atTribhuvanUniversity,especiallytoDr.SharadOnta,DepartmentHeadandDr.RameshAdhikari,PediatricianandProfessoratIOM.AdditionalthanksgototheNationalAgriculturalResearchCenter(NARC),especiallytoDr.DevendraGauchan.WealsothanktheNepalTechnicalAssistanceGroup(NTAG)foralltheir“behindthescenes”workinassistingwithlogistics,communicationsandregistrationfortheevent.WealsowouldliketorecognizeMr.AtmaramPandey,NPC,Ms.ShabnamShivakoti,MoAC,andMr.DiplavSapkotaaswellasthenumerousindividualswhohelpedsolicitparticipation.WeextendourgratitudetoDr.MarieRuelandDr.SuneethaKadiyalafortheirvaluableadviceandcontributions.Weextendspecialappreciationtotherapporteursoftheevent:Dr.SudeepShrestha,Ms.AkritiSingh,Mr.DiplavSapkotaandDr.RamanShrestha;withouttheirkeenattentionandcomprehensivenotes,thisreportwouldnothavebeenpossible.ThankyoutoDrs.PatrickWebb,RolfKlemmandKeithWestfortheirguidanceandsupportduringthepreparatoryphasesandconductofthisevent.SpecialthankstoMs.SwethaManoharforleadingtheorganizationofthisevent.Finally,wethankeachofthepresenterswhoputanextraordinaryamountofeffortintomakingthiseventasuccessfromsubmittingabstracts,tomakingrevision,tocreatingandshowcasingtheirpostersandoralpresentations.
![Page 5: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
EXECUTIVESUMMARY
TheGlobalNutritionCollaborativeResearchSupportProgram(CRSP)‐Asiathroughitspartner,JohnsHopkinsBloombergSchoolofPublicHealth,organizedatwo‐dayscientificsymposiuminKathmandu,Nepal,co‐hostedbytheDepartmentofCommunityMedicineandPublicHealthattheInstituteofMedicine(IOM).TheNutritionCRSPisamultidisciplinaryresearchconsortiumwhichseekstodetermineinvestmentsneededinagriculture,healthandnutrition,institutionalandhumancapacitydevelopment,andprogramdevelopmenttoachievelargescaleimprovementsinnutritionoutcomes.Thepreliminaryreportofthe2011NepalDemographicHealthSurveyshowsanimprovementinchildnutritionalstatusbetween2001and2006withstunting,wastingandunderweightprevalencedecreasingfrom49%to41%,31%to11%and39to29%,respectively[1].Nonetheless,chronicundernutritionisstillwidespread,andwidedisparitiesexistacrosssocioeconomicgroupsandecologicalregionswithchildrenfromthepooresthouseholdsandthoselivinginthemountainandhillareasexhibitingthehighest levelsofstunting.NepalisoneofthepoorestcountriesinSouthAsia.Ahighproportion(estimatesrangefrom25%‐55%)ofitspopulationlivesonlessthan<$1.25/day[2].Over80percentofthepopulationworksintheagriculturalsector,mostofwhoworkonsubsistence‐orientedfamilyfarms.HouseholdsemployedinagricultureaccountformorethanthreequartersofNepal’spoor.Manyofthesehouseholdsweredeeplyaffectedbytheprotractedconflict,droughtandothernaturaldisasters.Improvementsinagriculturalproductivityhavenotmaintainedpacewithpopulationgrowth,particularlyamongsmalllandholdersandfemalefarmers,thelatterconstitutingover60%oftheagriculturallaborforce.In2009,theWorldFoodProgrammereportedthat43ofNepal’s75districtsfacedafooddeficit,and23districtswerechronicallyfoodinsecure.Theinabilityofhouseholdstosuccessfully“weather”transitoryfoodsupplyshocksfromdrought,flood,marketfailure,orcivilstrifecanimpacttheirnutritionalintake,nutritionalstatusandhealth.FAO’sreporton‘Guidingprinciplesforlinkingagricultureandnutrition:Synthesisfrom10developmentinstitutions’illustratedthatthelinkagesbetweenagriculturefacesfour“mainconstraints:(i)informationonwhattodo,(ii)howtodoit,(iii)howmuchitwillcost(perbenefitgained),and(iv)howitwillbesupportedorrewarded”[3].Further,Leroyetal.notedthattheimpactofmulti‐sectoralprogramsfocusingonnutritionislimitedin2008[4].Improvedagricultureleadingtobetterhouseholdfoodsecurityhasbeenidentifiedasafundamentaldeterminantofprocessesthatleadtofoodsecurity,adequatedietaryintakeandnutritionalstatus,andhealth,yetlimitedempiricalevidenceexistsonthekindsofactionsinagriculturethatdo(ordonot)supportnutritionandhealthforimpoverishedsegmentsofthepopulationorgroupspassingthroughvulnerablelifestages.Littledataexistsbeyondpilotprojectsthatrevealwaystooptimizetheproduction,availabilityandaccessoffoodproductsthatassuredietarydiversityamongthepoor.Thepathwaysthatleadfromfoodproductiontohouseholdfoodsecuritytoimprovednutritionarecomplicated,withmultipledeterminants.Yet,systemsdoexistthatconveyfoodwithinand
![Page 6: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
acrosscommunitiesthroughouttheyear,withvariedefficiency,qualityandimpact.Itistheconnectedpathwaysthatweneedtounderstand,measureandclassify,andaddresstheirmodifiablecomponentsinordertoreducefoodinsecurityandundernutritioninhighriskgeographicareasandsocio‐economicgroups.Theserepresentcriticalstepstowardseffectiveprogramming.Theintentofthesymposiumwastoshare,understandandassimilatecountry‐relevantevidenceaboutfactorsthatcontributetocausalpathwaysthatleadfromagriculturetonutrition,innational,regionalandlocalcontexts.Anationalcallforabstractswasmadetoresearchersconductingworkacrossthesediversebutconnectedfieldstopresenttheirwork.Theeventwasattendedbyapproximately140participantsfromthescientific,research,program,policymakeranddevelopmentpartnercommunities.
Thesymposiumsoughttounderstand,fromdatarelevanttoNepal,(a)aspectsofagriculturalproductionthataffectfoodproductionquality,quantityandavailabilityinmarketsacrossecologicalzonesandseasons,(b)marketdynamicsthataffectyearroundandseasonalhouseholdaccesstofood,throughpurchaseorhomeproduction,(c)householdfoodsecurityandconsumptionnormsthatdeterminedietaryintake,and(d)elementsofdietaryadequacyandhygienethataffectnutritionalstatus,health,developmentandsurvival.Thesymposiumwasorganizedintofourthematicsessions:(1)Agriculture‐to‐Market,(2)MarketPurchaseorHomeProduction‐to‐Household,(3)HouseholdDiettoNutritionalStatusofWomenandYoungChildren,and(4)LinkagesAcrosstheCausalSpectrum.
Thefoursessionsdeconstructedandassessedthestrengthofevidenceofkeyfactorsalongthispathway,describedmethodsformeasuringthesefactors,exploredfactorsthatlinkdomainswithinthepathwayandattemptedtoidentifyevidencegaps.OralandposterpresentationsofabstractsonDay1coveredvariedtopics,includingtheimpactofconsumptionoflegumesonhealthoutcomes,resultsofcombinedinterventions(agriculturalproduction,incomegeneration,homegardening)onhealthandnutritional
![Page 7: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
outcomes,methodsavailabletoassessfoodinsecurity,andreviewsoffindingsfromrandomizednutritionalinterventiontrials.Day2ofthesymposiumconsistedofaparticipatoryanddynamicdiscussionofdomainsofconcernthatspantheagriculturetonutritionpathway,toidentifygapsinknowledge,designandmeasurementsissues,andcapacitybuilding.Themesraisedincluded1)improvingdietaryintake(quality&quantity)ofpoorandmalnourishedwomen&children;2)settingofpracticaldietarygoalsinthehomethatmayimprovenutritionalconditions;3)contextualfactorsthatinfluencedietaryadequacy;4)relationshipsbetweenhomefoodproduction,storageandprocessingtodietaryadequacy;5)marketfactorsthataffectyearroundfoodaccess;and6)agriculturalfactorsthataffectavailability,marketpricesandaccess(effectivedemand)tofoodinthehousehold.
Symposiumparticipantsidentifiedknowledgegapsbothwithinandbetweenthedomains.Theseincludedneedstobetterunderstand:(i)determinantsofhouseholdandchildmalnutrition,(ii)howdifferenttargetgroupsperceivenutritioninformation,and(iii)effectsofcommoncookingandfoodpreparationmethodsonnutritionalvalue,(iv)women’srolesinagriculturewithrespecttocontrolofhouseholdresources,decision‐making,intra‐householdfoodallocation,theirownnutritionandtheirabilitytocareoftheirchildren,(v)rolesofpovertyalleviationstrategiesforimprovingnutritionalstatusofwomenandchildren.
ThereisaneedtobuildresearchcapacitywithinNepalandtotranslateresearchfindingsintopolicyandprogramsacrossthecountryandmobilizingevidence‐basedadvocateswithingovernmenttopresentconvincingandbetterunderstoodfindingsarenecessary.
Basedondiscussionsthattranspiredthroughoutthesymposium,thesymposiumorganizingcommitteeidentifiedthefollowingpriorityactionsasrecommended“nextsteps”fortheNepalresearchcommunity:
Formacross‐disciplinaryworkinggroupcomposedofestablishedresearchersfromeachrelevantsector—agriculture,economics,marketing,foodsecurity,dietaryintake,publichealthandnutrition—toidentifythekeyresearchquestionsthatneedtobeaddressedinthenext3,5and10yearstoinformtheagriculture‐to‐nutritioncausalpathway.
Conductefficacy(i.e.underoptimalconditions)andeffectiveness(underreal‐lifeandprogrammaticconditions)researchonpromisingandrelevantinterventions.
Establishcommunity‐basedsurveillancesitesinthemajoragro‐ecologicalzonesinNepalto(i)providelongitudinalmeasuresoftrendsandchangesovertimeinfoodavailability,accessandutilization,andrelatethemtohouseholdfoodsecurity,dietaryintakeandnutritionandhealthstatus,and(ii)generateempiricalevidenceaboutintegratedagricultureandotherfoodandnutritionprograminterventionshaveaneffectonnutritionandhealthoutcomes.ThisshouldbeapriorityareafortheNutritionCRSP.
![Page 8: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Organizeabi‐annualorannualforumforpolicymakersfromtheNPC,MoACandMoHPandresearcherstodiscussandtranslateresearchfindingsthatpertaintoimprovementofnutritionstatusthroughamulti‐sectoralapproach.
Organizeanannualscientificsymposiumor“evidencesummit”tofacilitatetherapidsharingoffindingsandinnovativesolutions.
![Page 9: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
PROGRAMATAGLANCE
March21,2012:Day1
9:00‐9:20 MorningTeaandParticipantRegistration
9:20‐9:30 Welcome(Dr.SharadOnta)
9:30‐9:40 WelcomeandRemarksonFeedtheFutureandGlobalHealthInitiative:USAIDMissionDirector(Mr.DavidAtteberry)
9:40‐10:00 KeynoteaddressonAgriculture–NutritionPathway(Dr.RolfKlemm)
10:00‐10:10 OfficialOpeningandInauguralRemarksbyChiefGuest(HonorableDr.ShivaKumarRai)
10:10–10:20 OpeningRemarks(Dr.PraveenMishra,MoHP)
SESSION1:AGRICULTURETOMARKET
10:30–10:50 StateoftheArt/Evidence(Dr.DevendraGauchan)
10:50–11:05 1.1HouseholdConsumptionofGrainLegumesinNepalTerai:AStudyonImpactofImprovedTechnologies(Dr.RamKrishnaNeupane,FORWARDNepal)
1105‐11:20 1.2EfficienciesinLinkingAgriculturalDevelopmentwithHealthand
NutritionTraininginNepal(Dr.LukeCovalito,IDE)11:20‐11:35 1.3Highimpact,integratedapproachesforimprovedfoodsecurity
andnutritionofruralpoor(JoeSanders,Fintrac)
11:35‐12:00 Q&A,Rapporteurkeycomments,identifyingtheevidencegaps
12:00–12:45 Lunch
SESSION2:FOODMARKETSAND/ORHOMEPRODUCTIONTOHOUSEHOLDACCESS
12:45‐1:05 StateoftheArt/Evidence:ImprovingAccesstoNutritiousFoodsinRuralMarkets(Dr.MarieRuel)
1:05‐1:20 2.1ApplicationoftheHouseholdEconomyApproachforassessingfoodsecurityanddescribinglivelihoodsinNepal(Dr.NaomiSaville,MIRA&UCL)
![Page 10: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
1:20‐1:35 2.2HomesteadFoodProductioncontributestodietaryintakeamongchildren6‐23monthsoldinKailalidistrict,FarWesternTerai(DebendraAdhikari,HKI)
1:35‐1:502.3Foodsecurity,foodpriceandincometrendsinDhanushadistrictNepalbetween2005‐2011(BPShrestha,MIRA)
1:50–2:05 2.4Validatingdistrict‐levelassessmentwithsurveydata:examplefromtheNepalFoodSecurityMonitoringSystem(MarikoKawabata,WFP)
2:05‐2:30 Q&A,Rapporteurkeycomments,identifyingtheevidencegaps
2:30–3:00 Tea
SESSION3:HOUSEHOLDAVAILABILITY,ACCESSANDUSETODIETARYINTAKEANDNUTRITIONANDHEALTHOUTCOMESOFWOMENANDYOUNGCHILDREN
3:00‐3:20 StateoftheArt/Evidence(Dr.RameshAdhikari)
3:20‐3:35 3.1NutritionInterventionsthatImproveChildorMaternalHealthorSurvival:FindingsfromRCTsintheTeraiofNepalNNIPSresearch(Dr.KeithWest,JHU)
3:35‐3:50 3.2Growthandhealthofruralchildrenin3districtsofNepal:effectof
acommunitydevelopmentintervention(NeenaJoshi,HeiferInternational)
3:50‐4:05 3.3ImpactsofChangesinGrainPulse(legumeconsumption)onmicronutrientsupplyofruralwomeninNepalandNorth(Dr.PeterAndersen,UIB)
4:05–4:20 3.4CorrelatesofInfantandYoungChildFeedingPracticesinChepangcommunityofMakawanpur(Dr.Subedi,NepalPublicHealthFoundation,IOM)
4:20‐4:45 Rapporteurkeycomments,identifyingtheevidencegaps
4:45‐5:00 Closingremarks(Dr.Adhikari/Dr.Klemm)
![Page 11: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
March22,2012:Day2
SESSION4:IDENTIFYING,DEFINING,MEASURINGLINKAGESANDEVIDENCEGAPS
9:30‐9:45 ObjectivesforDay2(Dr.KeithWest&Dr.SharadOnta)
9:45‐12:15 Agriculture‐NutritionPathway:ResearchgapsintheNepalcontext(GeneralDiscussion,Moderators:Dr.KeithWest&Dr.SharadOnta)
12:15‐12:20 Closingremarks(Dr.PatrickWebb)12:20‐12:30 VoteofThanks(Dr.SharadOnta)12:30‐1:30Lunch1:30 Meetingadjourned
![Page 12: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
OPENING
Dr.SharadOnta,theDeanofCommunityMedicineandPublicHealthattheInstituteofMedicine,co‐hostfortheevent,openedtheNutritionCRSP’s“NepalAgriculture,FoodSecurityandNutritioninNepal:TakingStockandDefiningPriorities”symposiumbysettingforththepurposeforthesymposium.Theaim,Dr.Ontastatedwastoreviewevidenceandassessresearchgapsrelatingagriculture,markets,householdfoodsecurityandultimatelynutritionstatus.Throughthis,Dr.Ontastatedthesymposiumwouldserveasaplatformtomapfutureresearchagendas,prioritiesandcollaborations.Dr.OntawelcomedhonorableguestsandparticipantsandthenintroducedDr.PraveenMishra,theSecretaryoftheMinistryofHealthandPlanning(MoHP).
Inhisopeningremarks,Dr.PraveenMishra,Secretary,MoHP,statedthatthecomponentsoffarmtohealthandfitnessneedtobeexploredinatime,costandresourceeffectivemanner.Healsopointedouttheneedofidentifyingandaccessingmechanismoffoodsource,flowandtrendsofavailabilitythroughoutthecountry.
Next,Mr.DavidAtteberry,USAIDMissionDirectorprovidedopeningremarksonUSAID’seffortsand
commitmenttoamulti‐sectoral,integratedapproachtoaddressandfoodinsecurityandmalnutrition.AccordingtoMr.Atteberry,agriculture,foodsecurityandnutritionarethetopthreeforeignassistanceprioritiesoftheUnitedStatesGovernment.Heemphasizedaclearintersectionacrossdevelopmentsectorstoachievebetterandacceleratedresults.Henotedgapsinourunderstandingabouttherelationshipsbetweenagriculturalproduction,consumption,marketaccessandnutritionoutcomes,andtheneedtofillthesegaps,especiallyinlightofUSAID’sflagshipprogram,FeedtheFuture,whichseekstoimproveagriculturalproduction,incomegenerationandhealthandnutritioneducationalactivitiestodecreasehungerandpoverty.Aresearchagendatobetterelucidatetheagriculture‐nutritionlink,heemphasized,ispartofthisnewprogram.AtteberrynotedkeyUSAIDinvestmentsinNepal’seffortstoimprovenutritionthroughagriculture,includingtheSuaaharaProgramwhichwillcommenceimplementationin2012,theGlobalAgricultureandFoodSecurityProgram(GAFSP),managedbytheWorldBank,andaNepal‐based‘FeedtheFuture’program.HelaudedtheGON’scommitmenttowardsmulti‐sectoralplanningasevidencedbytheNationalPlanningCommittee’sformationofajointfoodsecurityandnutritionsteeringcommitteeanditsMulti‐SectoralNutritionPlan.Hestressedtheimportanceofresearchtoinformevidence‐basedprogramming.He
![Page 13: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
encouragedamulti‐disciplinaryresearchspanningtechnicalareasofpublichealth,socialsciences,economics,andagriculturetocollectivelystudytherelationshipbetweenmalnutritionandfoodproductionandcreateinnovativemethodsandsolutionstoaddressmulti‐facetedproblem.Heconcludedbychallengingtheparticipantstoremovetheir“technicalhats”andstepoutsideoftheirtechnicalsilostofindinnovativewaystosolvethispersistentandsignificantglobalpublichealthproblem.
FollowingMr.Atteberry’sspeech,Dr.RolfKlemmoftheJohnsHopkinsBloombergSchoolofPublicHealth,gavethekeynoteaddress.Detailsofhistalkarefoundinthenextsection.
TheHonorableMemberoftheNationalPlanningCommittee(NPC)andChiefGuest,Dr.ShivaKumarRai,officiallyinauguratedanddeclaredtheScientificSymposiumopen.Hewelcomedallparticipantsandreiteratedtheimportanceofevidenceasabasisforinforminggovernmentpolicy.HeexpressedtheGON’scommitmentforamulti‐sectoralapproachtoaddressmalnutritionand
foodsecurityinthecountry.Heremindedparticipantsabouttheimportanceofintegritywhilstconductingandpublishingresearchandtheneedtobevigilantofresearchersfalsifyingresultsfortheirownprofessionaladvancement.Heralliedforresearcherstocontinueintheireffortswhilstfulfillingallethicalobligationstotheirsubjectsandthelargerresearch,programandpoliticalcommunities.
![Page 14: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
SYMPOSIUMKEYNOTEADDRESS
ROLEOFEVIDENCEINLEVERAGINGAGRICULTUREFORIMPROVEDHEALTHANDNUTRITION
BackgroundNepalisafooddeficit,land‐lockedcountryof~30millionpeople,withhighlevelsofundernutritioninwomenandchildren.Recentestimateshaveshownadeclineinstuntingprevalenceamongchildrenunderfiveyearsofagefrom49%in2006to41%in2011(DHS,2011),butaggregateratesmaskdifferencesacrossregions,socio‐economicorcastestrata.Childhoodstuntingremainshighestamongruralchildrenresidinginmountainsandhilldistricts,whichalsohavethehighestratesoffoodinsecurity(FAO,AssessmentoffoodSecurityandNutritionSituationinNepal,2010).Thecausesofpoormaternalandyoungchildnutritionaremultifacetedandaregenerallyage‐specific.Atbirth,infantweightandlengtharedeterminedbymaternalfactors‐‐includingnutrition‐‐andgestationalage,i.e.whethertheinfantisfullterm.However,fromaboutsixmonthsthroughtwoyearsofageinfantfeedingpractices,particularlybreastfeedingandcomplementaryfeedingpractices,alongwithexposuretoinfectiousdiseaseappeartobethemaininfluencesongrowth.Studiesconductedinpoorpopulationsindicatethatthisisalsotheperiodwhengrowthfailureandnutritionalstressaregreatest.Amongundernourishedyoungchildrenpoornutritionisassociatedwithincreasedmortality,higherincidenceandgreaterseverityofinfection,suppressedimmune‐competence,anddelayedmotorandcognitivedevelopment(Figure1).Sub‐optimalnutritioninearlylifeoftenleadstopermanentsmallsizeinadulthood,andincreasesawoman’sriskofcomplicationsduringchildbirthanddeliveringasmallbaby,thusperpetuatingpoorgrowthintothenextgeneration.Amongundernourishedwomen,risksforobstetricmorbidityanddeliverycomplicationsarehigher,asisinfection,anemiaandriskofdeath.Earlylifenutrition‐InfluenceonlifelonghealthTheeffectsofearlylifenutritionareknowntohavelifelonginfluencesonhealth(Figure2).Awoman’snutritionalstatusatthestartofandduringherpregnancyinfluencesthenutrientsavailabletobetransferredtoherfetusandfetalgrowth.Itiswellknownthat
FIGURE1
![Page 15: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
FIGURE2
deficiencyiniodineandconsequentthyroidhormoneproductionduringcriticalperiodsoforganogenesiscandamagethebrainandnervoustissueofthedevelopingfetus,causingirreversiblementalretardationandotherdevelopmentalabnormalities.Inadequateweightgainduringpregnancycaninfluencethebaby’ssizeatbirthandotherdeficienciescompromisethephysiologicendowmentandmaturityoftheinfantatbirth.Duringearlyinfancyandchildhood,inadequatedietaryintakesofthemotherandinfantaffecttheyoungchild’sgrowth,abilitytoresistandfightinfectionandcognitivedevelopment.Eachofthese,inturn,canaffectthechildintohisschoolyearsandadultlife.Theperiodfromconceptionthroughaninfant’sfirsttwoyearsofliferepresentsacriticalwindowofopportunitytopreventthelifelongconsequencesofmalnutrition.Thisperiodisknownasthe“first1000days”andevidencesuggeststhatoncethiswindowofopportunitycloses,itisdifficultifnotimpossibletoreversethenegativeconsequencesofpoorgrowthandnutrition.EssentialNutrientFactsMuchhasbeenlearnedaboutessentialnutrientssincethefirstvitaminwasidentifiedalmost100yearsago,butthisknowledgeisoftenunderappreciated.Micronutrients,suchasvitaminA,iron,zinc,iodineandothers,cannotbeproducedbythebody,sotheymustbeprovidedthroughthediet.Thesenutrientsperformmillionsoffunctionsinthetrillionsofcellsinthehumanbody.Theyserveasco‐enzymes,regulatemetabolism,areinvolvedwithoxygentransportandcellularrespiration,playanactiveroleintheimmunesystem,andarecriticalforfunctionsinvirtuallyallcells,allofthetrillionsofcellsthatmakeupthehumanbody.
![Page 16: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
AlignmentoftheFoodSystemwithNutritionalOutcomesAgriculture,nutritionandhealthareinterrelated.Producingandconsumingadequateamountsandkindsoffoodpromotehealthynutrition.Inreality,however,foodproductionandconsumptionpatternsvarywidely,andareoftennotwellalignedandcanworkatcross‐purposes.Whenfoodsystemsarealignedwithnutritionalneedsintermsoftheamount,quality,safety,availability,affordabilityandaccessibility,theycancontributesignificantlytotheproductionofanutritionallyhealthypopulation(Figure3).Whenfoodsystemsaremisalignedwithnutritionalneedsofapopulationtheycansignificantlyinfluencetheratesofunderandover‐nutrition.Ofcourse,thefoodsystemoperatesinacontextwherecultural,socioeconomicandotherfactorsalsoinfluencehealthandnutrition,andwherethesefactorscanpositivelyornegativelyinteractwiththefoodsystemtoinfluencethepopulation’snutritionandhealth.Sounderstandingboththefoodsystemandthecontextinwhichitoperatesisvitalforunderstandingwhatpartsofthefoodsystemshouldbereshapedtobetterimprovenutritionalwell‐being.Nepal:TheAgriculture‐NutritionConnectionInNepal,considerableprogresshasbeenmadeinreducingpoverty,increasingproductivity,andreducingstuntinginchildreninthepast5‐10years.However,wastingprevalenceorabnormalthinnessamongchildrenhasincreased.Disaggregatingnationalestimatesrevealimportantandimpressivereductionsinchildhoodstunting–thatis,childrenbeingabnormallyshortfortheirage‐‐acrossallecologicalzones,rangingfromalowof14.7%inmountaindistrictstoahighof17.2%intheterai(Figure4).Butstuntingprevalenceremainsathighlevelsinallthreeecologiczones.Adifferentpictureemergeswithrespecttowastingprevalence.Theteraihasshownmajorreductionsinchildhoodwasting;butwastinghassignificantlyincreasedinthehillsandmountaindistricts.Largedisparitiesinbothstuntingandwastingratesremainbywealthquintile.Poorchildrenarealmosttwiceaslikelytobestuntedandwastedcomparedwiththeirwealthiercounterparts.MuchlessisknownaboutthechangesthathaveoccurredwithrespecttomicronutrientdeficienciesinNepaloverthepast5‐10years.ThelatestDHSshowslittleoverallchangeinanemiaprevalenceamongpregnantwomenandchildren,withsteepincreasesamongwomenintheHillsandMountains.ResearchpublishedbyNNIPSinSarlahirevealsthat
FIGURE3
![Page 17: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
micronutrientdeficienciesarecommon,concurrentandvarybyseasonamongruralNepalesepregnantwomen(JiangTetal,JNutr.2005).Newopportunitiestore‐focusagriculturetoachievebetternutritionandhealthoutcomesWhileNepal’sprogresshasbeencommendable,itstillfacesenormouschallengesrelatedtofoodsecurityandmalnutrition.ItalsofacesmanyopportunitieswiththeresurgenceofinterestandinvestmentinagricultureandstartofnewprogramslikeUSAID’sSuaaharaprojectwhichis,bydesign,attemptingtointegratenutritionandagricultureinterventions.Amajorquestionishowtousethesenewopportunitiestore‐focusandrealignagriculturetoimprovenutritionandhealthamongwomenandyoungchildren.Severalbroadstepsareneeded:
identifyandfillknowledgegaps ensurethatagriculture,healthandnutritionsectorsdonotworkatcross‐purposes proactivelyfindandscaleupinnovativeapproacheswithinappropriatecontexts,
and createanenablingenvironmentforcross‐disciplinarycollaborationand
cooperationPathwaysofimpactofagriculturalinterventionsonnutritionAgriculturecanworkthroughseveralkeypathwaystomightimpactnutritionaloutcomes(Figure5).Themostdirectpathwayisproducingfoodforhouseholdconsumption.Thesecondisthroughincreasedhouseholdincomethroughthesaleoffoodproducedorwagesfromfarmlabor.Athirdpathwayisthroughagriculturalpoliciesthataffectfoodprices.A
FIGURE4
![Page 18: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
fourthpathwayishowincomeobtainedfromagriculturalproductionorlaborisspent.Andafinalpathwayisthroughtheimplicationsthattheincreasingroleofwomenasagriculturallaborershason(i)theirabilitytoinfluencedecision‐makingregardingnutritionandhealthinthehome,(ii)timetocarefortheirchildren,and(3)impactontheirownhealth. Overthepast40‐50years,muchhasbeenlearnedabouthowagriculturalinterventionsdoordonotinfluencenutrition.TheGreenRevolutionofthe1960’sand70’sfocusedonincreasingfoodproductionandagriculturalproductivitythroughimprovedseedvarieties,agriculturalextensionandirrigationprojects.Whiletheseeffortsincreasedcerealproduction,theyignoreddistributionalissuesandnon‐cerealcrops,andthereforewereinsufficienttoeliminateundernutritionbecausethepoorestdidnothaveaccesstobothanadequatequantityandqualityoffood.Fromthelate1970’s,especiallyafterAmartyaSen’sworkoncausesoffaminein1981,malnutritionwaslinkedtofoodsecurity,andthefocusshiftedtowardsincreasingincomesandlivelihoodsratherthanfoodproduction.Butincreasesinincomedidnotimmediatelytranslatetoincreasedcaloricconsumptionorimproveddietaryquality.Thisrealizationinspiredanewwaveofresearchthataimedtoaddressbothissuesatthesametime.Projectssuchasdairydevelopment,andthepromotionofvegetablegardens,fisheriesandlivestock,aimedtoincreaseincomesofthepoorandincreaseavailabilityandaccesstonutritiousfoods.Theseinterventionswerethefocusofarecentlycompletedsystematicreview.DepartmentforInternationalDevelopment(DFID)SystematicreviewDFIDcommissionedasystematicreviewofagriculturalinterventionsthatassessedtheimpactofpotential“win‐win”agriculturalinterventionsthataimedtoimprovechildren’snutritionalstatusbyimprovingBOTHtheincomesANDdietsoftheruralpoor.Previousreviewsonthesamesubjectfoundmixedresultsornoimpactofagriculturalinterventionsonnutritionalstatus.Thisreviewbuiltonandexpandedpreviousreviewsbycoveringtheperiodof1990‐2010.
FIGURE5
![Page 19: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Thekeyconclusionofferedbytheauthorsofthisreviewstated,“Weattributethelackofimpactofagriculturalinterventionsonchildnutritiontomethodologicalweaknessesofthestudiesreviewedratherthanspecificcharacteristicsoftheseinterventions”.Inotherwords,theauthorsconcludedthatweakstudydesignsandmeasurementissueswereresponsiblefortheinconclusiveevidence.Thus,thequestionofwhetheragriculturalinterventionshaveapositiveimpactonthenutritionalstatusofchildrenremainsunanswered.Thereviewhighlightedfourmethodologicalweaknessesofstudieslinkingagriculturetochildnutritionstatus:(1)thelackofacrediblecounterfactual,(2)theuseofinadequateandoftenincomparablemetrics,(3)thelackofdataonparticipationratesorcharacteristicsofparticipantsofagriculturalinterventions,and(4)thelackofstatisticalpowertodetermineanimpactonchildnutritionalstatus.Theseweaknessesarebrieflydiscussedbelow:1. Lackofacrediblecounterfactual.Amajormethodologicalweaknesswhichledto
90%ofstudiesbeingexcludedfromthereviewwasthelackofacrediblecounterfactual.Acounterfactualenablestheestimationofeffectsthatwouldhaveoccurrediftheinterventionhadnotbeenimplemented.Crediblecomparisongroupsarenecessarytoestimateeffectsthatcanbeattributedtoanintervention.Thus,whenmeasuringtheimpactofanagriculturalprogramonanutritional(orother)outcome,anappropriatecounterfactualisneededsothattheobservedimpactcanbeattributedtotheintervention,andonecanruleoutotherfactorsthatmighthavehadanindependenteffectontheoutcome.
FIGURE6
![Page 20: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
2. Inadequateandnon‐comparablemetrics.Asecondmethodologicalweaknesscitedbythereviewisrelatedtothemeasurementstakenornottaken,theirvalidityandtheircomparabilityacrossstudies—particularlymeasurementofchangesinincomeanddietrelatedtoagriculturalinterventions.Forexample,studiesmaycaptureincomefromhomegardeningoroncashincomefromsalesoffooditemspromotedbytheagriculturalintervention.Butthesecanbeveryimprecisemeasuresofincomebecausepeoplemayinvestmoretimeandlaborinthisincomestream,whiledecreasingincomefromanothersource.Thus,withoutmeasuringtotalhouseholdincome,onecannotestimatetheoverallimpactoftheinterventiononhouseholdincomeandfoodexpenditure.Similarly,programsmeasureimpactondietdifferently.Someuseconsumptionoffooditemsspecificallypromotedbytheintervention,butthisalsoignoresthepotentialofa“substitutioneffect”.Soitisimportantthatstudiesfocusonindicatorsofdietaryconsumptionthatlookatthewholediet.Inaddition,someprogramsmeasurehouseholdexpenditureonfoodandstillothersmeasurethequantityoffoodsconsumedalthoughtheymayusedifferentmethods(24hrfoodrecall,semi‐quantitativefoodfrequencies),differentrecallperiods(pastday,pastweek,pastmonth),andreportconsumptionfrequencydifferently(e.g.yes/no,consumptioncomparedtoacut‐off,orbyusingadietarydiversityindex.Validandcomparableindicatorsareneededinordertoassesstheimpactofagriculturalinterventionsonnutritionaloutcomesacrossstudies.
3. Datalackingonparticipantratesandcharacteristics.Thereviewalsocitedthelackofdataonparticipationratesorcharacteristicsofparticipantsintheagriculturalinterventionsasaweakness.Agriculturalinterventionsareoftentargetedatspecificpopulationgroupsorattractindividualswithspecificcharacteristics—typically,thepoorortheverypoorparticipateintheseprograms,orthosewithaccesstolandandperhapswater.Becausethesegroupshavebaselineorpre‐interventioncharacteristics,includingnutritionalstatus,whichdifferfromthoseinthegeneralpopulation,theycannotbecomparedtothegeneralpopulation.Thelackofdataonparticipationratesandcharacteristicsofparticipantscompromisesourabilityto(1)assesstheimpactofinterventionsonspecificvulnerablegroups;(2)assessthetargetingefficiencyofinterventions;(3)understandwhodoesandwhodoesnotparticipate
![Page 21: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
intheintervention,and(4)whethertheinterventionimpactdependsonorismodifiedbythecharacteristicsoftheparticipants.Studiesshouldmakeanefforttocollectdataonbothparticipantsandnon‐participantsintheinterventionandcomparisongroupstoassessselectionandparticipantbiasandtoinvestigatethedeterminantsofparticipationandtheimpactoftheinterventionacrossvulnerablegroups.
4. Studieswereunderpowered.Anothermethodologicalweaknessidentifiedbythereviewwasthelackofpower—inastatisticalsense—todetectanutritionalimpactifoneexisted.Statisticalpowerislargelydeterminedbysamplesizeandthesizeoftheimpactonehopestodetect.Amongthestudiesreviewed,theaveragepowertodetectsmall(i.e.2%),medium(i.e.10%)andlarge(i.e.30%)differencesinstuntingprevalencewasonly4%,15%and51%,respectively.Therefore,futurestudiesshouldbedesignedtobesufficientlypoweredtodetectnutritionalimpactofagriculturalinterventions.
Awayforward? Fillinformationgaps.ForNepalandothercountriestodesignthemosteffective
policiesandprograms,moreneedstobelearnedabouthowmuchandwhatarethetypesormixesofagriculturalinterventionsarebestfornutritionandhealth.Forexample,shouldNepalinvestinstaplecrops,high‐valuecropsorlivestock?Whattypesofagriculturalinterventionswillimprovetheconsumptionofadiverseandadequatediet,especiallyamongvulnerablegroups?Whatconditionalfactors,suchaslandownership,caste,education,women’sstatus,marketstructures,andruralinfrastructure,dothemosttoleverageagriculturalgrowthforbetternutritionandhealthofwomenandchildren?Thereisanurgentneedtofillthisgapinknowledge.
Prioritizeresearchablequestions.Fillingeverygapinknowledgeimmediatelyisnot
possible;thusthereisaneedtoprioritizeresearchablequestionsthatwillhavethegreatestpotentialtoinformpoliciesandprograms,especiallyinthehillandmountaindistrictswherechildundernutritionratesarethehighest.
Createanenablingenvironmentfor“integrated”cross‐disciplinaryresearch.Modelsfor
successfulresearchthatbridgesinglesectorperspectivesareneeded.Researchersacrosssectorsneedtobecomeconversantineachother’s’professionallanguage,andincentivesmaybeneededtofostercross‐sectoralresearch.
Identifyandorcreatemetricsthatbridgetheag‐nutpathway.Thereisaneedto
identify,createandusevalidmeasuresthathaveutilityacrossthedomainsandsectorsalongtheagriculture‐to‐nutritioncontinuum.Forexample,inpublichealththeoutcomesweareconcernedwitharenutritionalstatus,morbidity,mortalityandincreasinglychilddevelopment.Importantagriculturaloutcomesincludeproductivity,agriculturalgrowth,incomeandreturnsoninvestments.Aretherewaystobridgethesetwoparadigms,and
![Page 22: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Identifyasetofindicatorsthatarebothvalidandfeasibletocollectunderfieldconditions?
Disseminateresultsandlessonslearnedacrossdisciplinessothatinnovativeapproaches
canbetakentoscaleinappropriatecontexts.Waystodisseminateresultsquicklyandbroadlyacrossdisciplinesandsectorsareneeded.Mechanismsneedtobecreatedtodothis.Publichealthnutritionsymposiararelyattractagriculturalistsoreconomistsandviceversa.Newplatformsandforumsforinformationandideaexchangeandcollaborationareneeded.
Embracefailureandsuccessandlearnfromthem.Finally,ascross‐disciplinaryresearchthataimstoilluminatethepathwaysbywhichagricultureimpactsonnutritionaloutcomesisconducted,thereisaneedtoembracebothfailureandsuccess.Programsuccessesandfailuresneedapost‐mortumtounderstandwhy,amongwhomandinwhatconditionstheinterventionssucceededorfailed(Figure7).Ifthechoiceofagriculturalinterventionsaddressesthemajorcausesofinadequatedietaryintakeandiftheyareimplementedwell,onewouldexpecttoseeimprovementsinnutritionalstatus.Ifthedesiredoutcomesarenotachieved,thebasisforinterventionchoicesaswellastheadequacyofprogramimplementationmustbereviewed.Wastheimplementationchoicecorrect?Wasimplementationadequateintermsofcoverage,qualityandreachingthoseatgreatestrisk?Werethestudydesignsusedtomeasureprogramimplementationandoutcomesadequate?Didtheinterventionchoicestrulyaddressanimportantunderlyingdeterminantofmaternaland/orchildundernutrition.Adequateandrobuststudydesignsandimplementationareneededtoassessif,andwhatkindsof,investmentsinagriculture‐andfood‐basedstrategieseffectivelyachievesignificantandacceleratedreductionsinmaternalandchildundernutritionatscale,overandabovenutritionandhealthinterventions.
FIGURE7
![Page 23: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
SESSION1
AGRICULTURETOMARKETS
Session1focusedonresearchthatexploredthelinkbetween‘agriculturetomarket’andfactorsthatinfluencedagriculturalproductionandmarketavailability.Althoughagricultural(food)productionisconsideredadirectpathwayforhouseholdconsumption,thereexistseveralkeyintermediatepathwaysorfactorsthatimpactnutritionaloutcomesatthehouseholdlevel.Oneintermediatepathwayisthroughincreasedfoodproduction,whichmayincreasehouseholdincomethroughthesaleoffoodproducedorwagesfromfarmlabor.FindingsaddressingthisintermediatepathwaypresentedinSession1were:
increasedhomesteadandoff‐seasonfoodproductionandtheuseofimprovedtechnologyincreasedfoodavailabilityandhouseholdfoodconsumption
healthandnutritiontrainingwhenlinkedwithagricultureresultsincreasedhouseholdnutritionintermsofcalorieandproteinintakeandchangeinhealthbehavior
improvednutritionaloutcomesthroughagriculturearepossiblewheninterventionsfrommultiplesectorsareintegratedsuchasacoordinatedapproachofnutritionawarenessandbehaviorchangetrainingwithagriculturalproductionand/orincomegenerationactivities
researchthatmeasurestheeffectsofeachtheseinterventionsaloneversusincombinationonnutritionoutcomesoverasignificantperiodoftimeislimited
Dr.Gauchan,fromtheNepalAgriculturalResearchCouncil(NARC),presentedanoverviewofNepal’sagro‐economyandinsightsontheroleofagricultureinfoodsecurityandnutritioninNepalinhissession‐specifickeynotetalk.HestatedthatNepal’sruralagrarianeconomymakesagriculturethemainsourceofincomeandemploymentandthusisaprimarycontributortothelivelihoodofNepalipeople.Itisakeydriveroffoodconsumptionpatternsinbothruralandurbanareaandanessentialfactorforfoodsecurity
andnutritionbyvirtueofbeingbothasourceoffoodandincome.Agriculturalproductionalsoinfluencesthefluctuationsinfoodpriceswhichinfluenceshouseholdfoodsecurity.Intheory,increasedfoodproductionmayincreasemarketsupplyand,inturn,increasehomeconsumption.Butinpractice,significantamountsoffoodand/orthenutrientvalueofthosefoodsaredisplacedbythetimeitis
FIGURE8
![Page 24: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
availableforindividualconsumption.Therefore,despitethelinkagesbetweenfoodproductionandfoodavailability,gapsinthispathwayexist.AgriculturalproductivityinNepalislowerthanthecountry’spotentialproductivityasindicatedbyareportonpulseproductionpresentedbyMr.Neupane.Thereportstatesthatthenationalaverageofpulseproductionislessthanhalfofpulseproductionpotential.AmajorreasonforfoodinsecurityinNepalisthelimitedinvestmentinagricultureandagriculturalresearch.Also,smalllandplotsandtheuseofnon‐commercializedfarmingmethods,especiallyamongstpoorerfarmers,contributetolowfoodproduction.
Householdsoftenselltheirproduceinsteadofconsumingitforincome;however,amajorportionoffarmers’incomesareultimatelyspentonfoodpurchases.Otherconstraintsofoptimalproductionispooraccesstoimprovedseedsandalackoffarmers’knowledgeonutilizationofimprovedtechnologies,limitedlandareawithminimaloutput,cropdiseases,pests,poorpostharvestsaswellaslimitedmarketoptions.Duetothegeographicaldiversityin
Nepal,seasonalityisanimportantfactorinfluencingfoodavailabilityandmarketprices.Duringleanmonths(i.e.MaytoSeptember)poorhouseholdsaremostvulnerableandsufferfromhigherratesofundernutrition.Climatechanges(rainfallvariability,temperatureandincreaseincidenceofdiseasesandpests)furtherdriveupratesofundernutritionamongvulnerablegroupsinthistimeswindow.Interventionssuchashomesteadfoodproduction,thepromotionanduseofimprovedtechnology,commercialfarmingandinfrastructuredevelopment(allofwhichwerediscussedduringSession1)havebeenshowntostabilizemarketvariabilityandprice.Dr.Gauchanrecommendedstrengtheningeffortstoensureyear‐roundavailabilityofnutrientrichfoods,andtheneedforexpandingtheuseoftechnologiessuchasoff‐seasonfoodproductionofvegetables,breedingnutrientrichcropvarieties,fortificationduringfoodprocessing,technologyfordetectingfoodcontaminants,improvingtheshelflifeofprocessedfoodproducts,technologyforreducingdrudgeryandpost‐harvesthandlinglosses.However,heacknowledgedthelackofdatadefinitivelylinkingtheseapproachestoimprovementsinagricultureproductionandfoodavailabilityatthehouseholdlevels.RamKrishnaNeupane,fromFORWARDNepal,reportedonastudyshowingthatlegumeproductionandhouseholdlegumeconsumptioncanbeincreasedusinginterventionsthatcombinewiltresistant/tolerantvarietiesoflegumes,croprotation,seeddressingwithfungicidealongwithcapacitybuildingoflegumegrowers(throughtraining,regularvisits,workshopsandawarenessraising).Hesuggestedthataccesstoimprovedseedsandknowledgeatthelocallevelisimportanttocontributetoincreasedproductivity.Although
![Page 25: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
hisresearchfindingsshowedanincreaseinpulseconsumption,theoverallimpactontotalhouseholddietornutritionalstatusofhouseholdmemberswasnotmeasured.Henotedthatmostoftheincomegeneratedbyincreasedpulseproductionwasspentonimprovingsoilqualityandthehousehold’spersonalhealthexpenses.Healsospeculatedthatnutritionalstatusmightbeimprovediftheincreasedpulseconsumptionaddedtotheoveralldietofhouseholdmembersand/orreplacedfoodsoflessernutritionalvalue.
Dr.LukeCovalitopresentedfindingsfromtheSmallholderIrrigationMarketInitiative(SIMI).Henotedthatthisprojectincreasedsmalllandholderincomes,healthandnutritionthroughtrainingandthecreationofvalue‐chains.KeyfeaturesofSIMIincludedaccesstomicroirrigation,improvedtechnologies,multiple‐usepipedwatersystems,andthedevelopmentofsmallholdercommercialpockets.TheuseoftrainingmethodologycalledtheParticipatoryLearningApproach(PLA),whichincludesliteracyembeddedwithhealthnutritiontraining,wasconsideredespeciallyimportantinimprovingparticipants’healthandnutrition.Theprojectreportedthat15%ofvegetablesproducedbyhouseholdswereconsumedbythehouseholdmembers,althoughfurtherresearchiswarrantedtoestablishifandtowhatextentminimumnutrientrequirementsaremetgivensuchconsumptionlevels.Dr.Covalitonotedthecostbenefitsofcombiningagriculture,healthandnutritiontraining,andrecommendedfurtherresearchtobetterunderstandhowbehaviorchangesduetoincomegenerationimpactonfoodandnutrition.Henotedthattargetinginterventionstoclustersofthepooresthouseholdsislikelytoachievebetterresults.
JoeSandersfromUSAID’sNepalFloodRecoveryProgramexplainedthatintegratedinterventionsacrosssectorslikecommercialagriculture,nutrition,andinfrastructurecanhaveanimpactonfoodsecurityofruralpeople.Inhispresentation,hestatedthatwithoutunderstandingtargetedfarmers’economicsituations,landholdingsize,andpotentialasproducers,foodsecurityprogrammaticinterventionsmaynotbeveryeffective.Inadditiontotraditionalfarmingpractices,aside‐by‐sideinvestmentinimprovedtechnologies,inputsandagronomicpracticesarerequiredtoincreaseoutput,farmers’capitalbaseandlongertermsustainabilityofsuchoutcomes,statedSanders.Suchinvestmentswouldalsoaffectlocalvaluechains,andtheincorporationofnutritioneducationandbehaviorchangetrainingcouldhaveimpactsonhouseholdfoodsecurityoverall.Henotedthatmajorityoffoodinsecurehouseholdsaresmalllandholdersso,thesewouldbeappropriatetargetgroups.TheimpactofcommercialfarmingonhouseholdfoodsecurityisnotwellstudiedinNepal.
DuringSession1,ingeneral,barrierstolinkagriculturetomarketwereidentifiedandsuggestionsweremade.Poorroadconnectivityandinfrastructure,inefficientsmall‐scale
![Page 26: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
andscatteredproduction,lackofmarketinformation,highpost‐harvestlossesaremanyofthebarriersthatexistbetweenfoodproductionandavailability.Validtestingisrequiredtoidentifywhetherthosebarriersspecificallylieinthepathwaycontributingtopoornutritionaloutcomes.Itwasreportedthattargetedinvestmentsinproductiveinfrastructureshouldbemadeinordertoachievesubstantialimprovementsinagriculturalproductionandcommercialization.
Potentialactorsinthepathwayofagriculturetomarketsuchasretailers,localtraders,agro‐processors,exportersandothersshouldbecarefullyexaminedfortheircontributiontofarmers’economy,foodavailabilityandfoodmarketstability.ItisstillnotclearwhetherNepal’scurrentagriculturalpoliciessupportsthesustainabilityofapproachestoimproveproductionandwhethertheyfacilitatefarmer‐marketlinkages.Internationaltradeandliberalizationoffoodmarketsaswellasexpansionoffoodretail,foodprocessingandmarketingindustriesarebelievedtohelplinkagriculturetomarket,therefore,shouldbeconsiderationswhiledesigningstudies.
Therearestillmanyknowledgegapsinourunderstandingofhowtoreshapeagriculturetoimprovenutritionaloutcomes.Therearenotvalidreportstodescribehowincomefromagricultureproductionisbeingspentandhowandtowhatextentthisimpactshouseholdconsumptionofnutritiousfoods.Relationshipsbetweenincreasedproductionandincreasedmarketavailabilityandimprovedhouseholdfoodsecurityandnutritionneedtobevalidated.
TimewasallocatedforquestionsandanswersbetweentheaudienceandpresentersfollowingSession1.Theaudiencechallengedthepanelaskingwhetherincreasedproductionandconsumptionoflegumespotentiallydisplacesconsumptionofotherstaplefoodsandwhattrulywasthecosteffectivenessoflinkingagriculturetonutrition.GivenNepal’slimitedresources,thepanelurgedtothinkofhowtobestapplylimitedresourcesforoptimalreturns.Studiesneedtofocusonthecomparisonbetweengrowtoeatversusgrowtomarkettoseewhichoneismorecontributorytoimprovedfoodproductionand
![Page 27: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
nutritionalhealth.Itisalsoimportanttoidentifydemandversussupplypatternsaswellaswhatisactuallyconsumptionversusmarketavailability.Intermsofnutrition,farmerstendtosellproducenotconsumewhattheygrowwhichneedstobeexploredinastandarddesignforitsimpactonnutrition.
Itwassuggestedduringthediscussiontoexplorewhethernutritioneducationtomothersbestassociatedwithchangesinbehavioractuallyhaveanimpactonnutritionoutcomes.Postharvestnutrientlossesareanotherareathattheaudienceprobed.AttheendofSession1,thespeakersandaudiencesexpressedtheirthoughtsoncropprotectionfrominsects,postharvestfoodpreservation,anti‐nutrientfactors,developmentofruralmarketstoimprovefoodsecurityandnutrition,astrategyofmulti‐sectoralandinter‐disciplinaryinterventioncombiningagriculture,nutritionandhealth,andtheneedformoreinclusiveagriculturalgrowthtargetedwithnutritioninterventionsthatempowerofwomenandtargetdisadvantagedgroups.
SESSION2
LINKINGFOODMARKETSAND/ORHOMEPRODUCTIONTOHOUSEHOLDACCESS
ThemainfocusofSession2washouseholds’accesstofoodsthroughmarketavailabilityorhomefoodproductionandapproachestoimprovelinkagesbetweenagricultureandnutritionthroughmarketdynamics.Theruralpoor’saccesstofoodsrichinessentialmicronutrientssuchasfruitsandvegetables,meat,fish,dairyproducts,andbio‐fortifiedstaplefoodsisrestrictedbecauseoflimitedavailability,economicconstraints,lackofknowledgeandinformation,andarelatedlackofdemandfornutritiousfoods.
Agriculturalproductionmayhelpat‐riskgroupsgeneratemoreincomeandhelpmakenutritiousfoodsmoreavailable,affordable,acceptable,andofhigherquality.Onitswayfromfarmtomouth,foodundergoesstorage,distribution,processingandpreparationprocessesthataffecttheavailability,affordability,acceptability,andnutritionalqualityofthesefoodstotheconsumer.Itiscriticaltoanalyzewhathappensbetweenproductionandconsumptionthataffecteconomicandnutritionalvalueofthefoodproduct.
Session2startedwithakeynotespeechfromDr.MarieRuel,whopresentedmaterialontheconceptofanutrition‐sensitivevalue‐chaintoimproveaccesstonutritiousfoodsinruralmarkets.Thistypeofvaluechainisbelievedtohavethepotentialtoimpactnutrition,buttheconceptisinitspreliminarystageandisnotyetwidelyused.Dr.Ruelnotedthatmicronutrientdeficiencyisaglobalproblemandthepoorareoftenthemostvulnerabletothesedeficienciesbecausetheylackaccesstodiverse,nutrient‐richfoods.Dr.Ruel,basedonworkdoneinAfricaandHonduras,statedthatusingtheconceptofa“nutritionsensitivevaluechain”canprovidecluesforstrengtheningagriculture‐nutritionlinkagesandmaximizingthepotentialforaddednutritionalvaluealongthefoodchain,bymaximizing,conserving,oraddingnutrientsatkeypoints.Identifyingwherethenutritiveandeconomic
![Page 28: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
valuescanbecreatedinthesupplyside,valuechainfornutritionapproachcanbeusedtoincreasetheavailability,affordability,andqualityofnutritiousfoods.Itcouldenhancetheperception,supplyanddemandofnutritiousfoodstothepoorandcreatetheeconomicbenefitstoat‐riskproducers(seeFigure9).Inadditiontoimprovingnutrition,thisconceptprovidessolutionstodevelopmentchallengesinothersectorssuchasinagricultureaswellastheconceptcanbeusedtoidentifytheproblemsandtodesignandimplementsolutionstoincreasetheavailability,affordability,andqualityofnutritiousfoods.
Inputs into production
Food production
Food storage, processing
Food distribution, transport
Food retail and labeling
MORE NUTRITIOUS/SAFER FOODS AVAILABLE/AFFORDABLE
Examples of actions that can be used to make value chains nutrition sensitive
Increased intake of nutritious/safer foods among the poor
Activities on the supply side
Test, evaluate, adopt solutions to enhance nutrient content & safety along the value chain Activities on the
demand side
Characterize diets, markets & constraints to access to nutritious/safe foods
Develop, test, evaluate new tools to improve knowledge, awareness, and demand for nutritiouand safe foods
Identify bottlenecks and processes where nutrients are lost & opportunities to restore or increase them
FIGURE9
Anexampleofusingapplyinga“nutritionsensitivevaluechain”approachistheadditionofmicronutrientrichproductstotortillaproductioninHonduras.Carrots,sweetpotatoes,spinachandothermicronutrientrichfoodshavebeenaddedtotheproductionprocessandhaveaddedcolorandimprovedmicronutrientcontenttotortillaswhichhaveresultedinanincreaseddemandforandconsumptionofmorenutritioustortillasamongchildrenandpregnantmothers.Astheconceptofvaluechainfornutritionisinitspreliminaryphase,a
lotmoreworkneedstobedonetodetermineitsfeasibilityandpracticalityinthecontextofpovertystrickencountrylikeNepalasincreaseinnutritionvaluemayaccompanyincreaseinprice.
FIGURE10
![Page 29: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
Nepalissociallyandculturallydiversecountryandadefinitiveassociationexistsbetweensocioeconomicstatusandhouseholdaccesstofood.Differentwealthgroupshavedifferentfoodconsumptionpatternsanditisimportanttoanalyzefoodsecurityandlivelihoodsituationamongthesegroups.Sincewomenarepredominantlyin‐chargeofhouseholdfoodpreparationsanddistribution,targetedinterventionstowomen’sgroupscouldimpacthouseholdbehavioralchangesassociatedwithnutritionoutcomes.Dr.NaomiSavilleusedthe
HouseholdEconomyApproach(HEA)tostudyfoodsecurityandlivelihoodsituationofdifferentwealthgroupsinTerai.Interviewsandmarketsurveyscompletedinthisstudyindicatedthathouseholdexpenditureincreaseswithwealthgroups,andthepoorspendsmoreinfoodandlessinagricultureinputsandeducation.Staplecropproductioncontributesmoretowardsthesourceoffoodconsumptiontothehigherwealthgroups(Figure10,Figure11).Thepoordependonlaborexchangetofulfilltheircalorierequirement.Thusthepooraremorelikelytoworktoaffordfoodandtheirlackofagriculturaloutiseitherduetothelackofknowledgeorresourcesleadingtolimitedfoodproductionandfoodsecurity.
Inadditiontosocialandculturaldiversity,diverseecologicalvariabilityinNepalaffectsfoodproduction,availabilityandconsumptionpatternsamongvariouspopulationgroupsinvariousregions.Thiscausesmorevariabilityinfoodsecurityandmakesfoodsecuritymonitoringcomplexandchallenging.MarikoKawabatafromtheWorldFoodProgrammeillustratedtwodifferentdatacollectionmethodstoassessfoodsecuritymonitoringinNepalinordertoprovidereliableandtimelyinformationforappropriateactiontopreventhumansufferingfromfoodinsecurity.Datacollection(especiallyinformationobtainedseasonallyatthevillagelevel)usingthephaseclassificationapproach(developedbasedontheprinciplesofglobalIntegratedFoodSecurityPhaseClassification(IPC)methodologypioneeredbyFAOinSomalia)bytheDistrictFoodSecurityNetworks(DFSNs)wascomparedandvalidatedagainstcrosscountryhouseholdsurveysdesignedtomonitorfoodsecurityby
FIGURE11
![Page 30: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
ecologicalbeltorsub‐regionbyseasonandyear.KeyfoodsecurityindicatorsfromthehouseholddataconfirmedthedegreeoffoodinsecurityreportedbytheDFSNsprovidingvalidtoolsforfoodsecuritymonitoring.
BPShresthafromMotherandInfantResearchActivities(MIRA)ontheotherhandapplieddifferentfoodinsecuritymeasurementtoolsinhisstudy,namelytheHouseholdDietaryDiversityScore(HDDS),MonthsofAdequateHouseholdFoodProvisioning(MAHFP)andHouseholdFoodInsecurityAccessScale(HFIAS).ThesetoolsindicatedthatpoorandDalit(definedaslowercaste)sufferedthemostfromfoodinsecurity.Thisstudydemonstratedthatincomegenerationeitherbyagricultureorothermeansimprovesfoodsecurity.
CommunitydevelopmentprogramslikeActionAgainstMalnutritionThroughAgriculture(AAMA)haveshownpositiveresultsintermsofincomegeneration,micronutrientrichfoodavailabilityandknowledgeofhealthandnutritionthathaveimprovedmother’sandyoungchildren’snutritionalstatus.EssentialNutritionActions(breastfeeding,complementaryfeeding,maternalnutrition,nutritionforsickchild,micronutrientdeficiencies),homesteadfoodproduction(VillageModelFarms,homegardensandpoultry),behaviorchangecommunication(counselingandnegotiationsskill,IEC(flipchart,counselingcard,posteretc.)aresomeofthestrategiesthatAAMAimplementedintheFarWesternregionsofthecountry.DebendraAdhikarireportedthatthesestrategieshaveimprovedhomefoodproductionandincreasedknowledgeofappropriateinfantfeedingrequirementsleadingtoimprovedinfantfeedingpractices.
Povertyappearstobeakeydeterminantofhouseholdfoodaccess.Uponincomegeneration,peopletendtospendmoreonnutritiousfoods.Howeverduringthequestionanswersession,participantsexpressedtheirconcernaboutmaintenanceoffoodqualitythroughoutthesupplychain.Theaudiencenotedthatpeopleprefertoeatwhattheyhavetraditionallybeeneatingandchangingdietaryhabitscanbechallenging.PeopleinNepalseemtobemorereceptivetoeatingmorenutritiousrawfoodpreparationsratherthanprocessedfoods.However,itisimportanttogenerateevidencetodeterminewhichaspectsofbehaviorchangeareeffectiveinimprovingdietaryhabits.Thefarmer’sinstinctistogrowtosell.Noorlimitedlandholdingsofthepoorisanissueforthecreationofhomegardens.Themostfoodinsecurehouseholdsareoftenthosewithnoorlittlelandorotherresourcesrequiredforagriculturalproduction;thus,promotingonlyagriculturalinterventionsisnotadequate.Nonetheless,agricultureisthemainmechanismtoincreaseincomeastherearenootherjobopportunitiesintheruralareas.
![Page 31: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
SESSION3
HOUSEHOLDAVAILABILITY,ACCESSANDUSETODIETARYINTAKEANDNUTRITIONANDHEALTHOUTCOMESOFWOMENANDYOUNGCHILDREN
Theimportantpartoftheagriculture‐to‐nutritionpathwayistoexplorehowdownstreamprocesses,suchasagriculturalproduction,marketaccessandaffordability,andhouseholdfoodavailability,influencedietaryintakeandnutritionandhealthoutcomesinwomenandyoungchildren.Understandingthefoodsupplysystem—fromproductiontoconsumption—enablesonetoexplorethepointsinthesystemthatinfluencetheamount,quality,safety,availability,affordabilityandaccessibilityoffoods,andultimately,thenutritionalhealthofaspecifictargetgroup.Ofcourse,afoodsystemoperateswithinacontextofcultural,socioeconomicandotherfactorsthatalsoinfluencehealthandnutrition.Thesefactorscanpositivelyornegativelyinteractwiththefoodsystemtoinfluencethepopulation’snutritionandhealth.Thusunderstandingthecontextinwhichitoperatesisvitalforunderstandingwhatelementsofthefoodsystemshouldbereshapedtobetterimprovenutritionalwell‐being.Dr.RKAdhikariinhiskeynotespeechhighlightedthedoubleburdenofthenutritionalproblemsinNepalreflectedbyindicatorsofundernutrition(i.e.lowbirthweight,stunting,underweight,wastingandirondeficiencyanemia)andalsoovernutrition(i.e.overweightandobesity).The2011DHSshowsanimprovementinmaternalnutritionandaslightdeclineintheprevalenceofstuntingandunderweightinchildren,however,wastingratesremainedalmoststaticsince2006.Despiteimprovementsinseveralmaternalandchildnutritionstatusindicators,ratesofundernutritionremainalarminglyhighinNepal.Forexample,theprevalenceofanemiainwomenandchildrenisstill35%and46%respectively.Iodinedeficiencyinhighmountainareaspersistsalthoughthehouseholdsusingiodizedsaltinotherpartsofthecountryhavelowlevelsofiodinedeficiency.Breastfeedingisuniversalandbreastfeedingpracticeshaveimprovedsignificantly.ButpoormaternalnutritionstatusandinappropriatecomplementaryfeedingpracticescontinuetocontributetopoorgrowthanddevelopmentinNepalichildren.Moreover,seasonality,workloadofmothers,gastrointestinalinfection,intra‐householdfooddistributionandfoodgiventochildrenalsoinfluencethenutritionalstatusofmothersandchildren.
Asmentionedearlier,dietaryhabitsalsoplayamajorroleofdietaryintakeandriskofundernutrition.Feedingpracticesdifferacrosscommunitiesduetodifferencesinculture,knowledgelevelandsocio‐economicstatus.Over‐dependenceoncerealfoods,withoutnutrient‐densefoods,canleadtohighratesofmicronutrientdeficiencies.Forexample,Dr.PeterAndersonmentionedthatpulseconsumptioncontributeslessthan3%tototalcalorieintakewhilericeconsumptioncontributesmorethan63%.Pulsesareagoodsourceof
![Page 32: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32
micronutrientslikevitaminB2,folate,calcium,potassiumandiron;declinesinpulseconsumptionmaybecontributingtolowintakesoffoodsrichinessentialmineralsandvitamins.Dr.Anderson’spresenteddatashowingadeclineinpulseconsumptioninSouthAsia,andmodeledtheimpactofincreasingpulseconsumptiononimprovingnutrientintake.Themodelsshowedthatadding30gofrice‐beanintaketothedietwouldsubstantiallyincreasefolateintake,aswellaslysine,Ca,K,FeandotherB‐vitamins.Dr.Andersonrecommendedpromotingpulseintake,alongwithfortificationofstaples,toimprovethemicronutrientintakeofthepopulation.
NeenaJoshi,ofHeiferInternational(HI),providedpreliminaryevidenceshowingthatcommunitydevelopmentinterventionscanimprovethelivelihoodofpoorandundernourishedcommunities.HIusesacomprehensiveapproachthatprovideshouseholdswithsmallanimals,mentorsthemtoincreaseincomeandassetownership,trainsthemonsavingandlendingschemes,andprovideshealthandnutritioneducation.PreliminaryresultsfromanHIstudyshowedimprovementsinchildren’sweightinheightintheTeraibutnotinthehills,butthestudydesignanddurationwerenotadequatetoevokecausalattributiontotheprogram.HIis,however,conductingalongtermfollow‐upoftheproject’sbeneficiaries,andwillreportontheirfindingsinthefuture.Dr.KeithWest,fromJohnsHopkinsSchoolofPublicHealth,summarizedanextensivebodyofevidenceonnutritionstatusandinterventionscontributedbytheNepalNutritionInterventionProjectSarlahi(NNIPS),whichhasbeenoperatinginNepalsince1987.NNIPShascompletednumerousrandomizedcontrolledtrials(RCT)toevaluatetheimpactofnutritionalinterventions.Thefirstofthese,NNIPS‐1,showedthatpreschoolvitaminAsupplementationreducedchildmortalityby30%.ThiswasfollowedbyNNIPS‐2,whichshowedthatweeklyvitaminAorβ‐carotenereducedmaternalmortalityby~40%.NNIPS‐3showedthatmaternalironandfolicacidsupplementationimprovedbirth,anemia,andinfantandchildsurvival.NNIPS‐4evaluatedtheeffectsofdailyiron/folicacidand/orzinconmortality.Finally,theNNIPScohortfollow‐upsassessedthelong‐termhealtheffectsofmicronutrientinterventions.Thesestudiesalsoprovideddatashowingthatmultiplemicronutrientdeficienciesco‐existamongwomeninruralNepalandthesupplementationtrialsimprovedhealth,functionandsurvivalamongthemostvulnerablegroupssuchasinfants,childrenandwomen.TheNNIPSstudiesalsorevealedimportanthouseholdbehaviorandeconomicinfluencesondietsandhealthrisksofchildren.Women’semploymentandaccesstocashwasfoundtobeacriticalfactorinraisingeffectivedemandforamorenutritiousdiet.NNIPSstudieshavealsoshownthatearlyinitiationofbreastfeedingreduceinfantmortality,thatdietaryadequacyinchildrendependonwithwhomtheyeatmealsand,thisinturn,canmarkedlyinfluencedietandnutritionalstatus.NNIPSfindingsconfirmedthatprovidinganincomeaccompaniedwithhealthandnutritioneducationcanimprovehouseholdnutrition.TheNNIPSstudieshaveprovidedawealthofevidence‐basedresultsthathaveandcancontinuetoinformnutritionandpublichealthpolicyandprogramdecisionsinNepal.
ThediscussionfollowingSession3presentationsnotedthelackofrandomizedtrialsusingfoodsratherthansupplementstoevaluatefood‐basedinterventionsonnutritional
![Page 33: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
33
outcomes.Recommendationsfromthediscussionweretoevaluatetheroleofbio‐fortificationonnutrientintakeandstatus,theeffectsofhouseholdbehaviorchangeonnutrition,andtherisksoftheenvironmentalexposures(suchasaflatoxinandpollution)ongrowthandnutritionalwell‐being.ParticipantsrecommendedfutureresearchinNepalshoulduseonlyvalidateddatacollectionandmeasurementtools,identifyasetofcommonindicatorsthatcouldbeusedinbothagricultureandnutritionalsurveystofacilitatelinkages,enableinter‐sectoral“cross‐talk”andimprovefoodsecuritymonitoring.ProductionofstaplesandinstitutionalizationofthemarketingwasalsosuggestedtobeanapproachtofightfoodinsecurityinNepal.Inaddition,thediscussionhighlightedtheneedforresearchonpost‐harvestprocessestominimizefoodandnutrientlosses,andonfeasiblewaystomeasureindicatorsofhouseholdincomeandconsumption.
SESSION 4
IDENTIFYING,DEFINING,MEASURINGLINKAGESANDEVIDENCEGAPS
Day2ofthesymposiumwasaparticipatorydiscussiontoelicitandprioritizeresearchgaps,identifystudydesignandvariablemeasurementissues,andidentifyresearchcapacitybuildingpriorities.
Priorityresearchdomainsfocusedon:
Improvingthedietaryintake(quality&quantity)ofpoor/malnourishedwomen&children
Nutritionalgoalsinthehome Dietaryfactorsinthehomethatimprovenutritionalconditions Contextualfactorsthatinfluencedietaryadequacy Homefoodproduction,storageandprocessingfactorsthataffectdietaryadequacy Marketfactorsthataffecthomefoodsecurity Agriculturalfactorsthataffectmarketprices,availability,andhouseholdaccess
![Page 34: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34
Thediscussion,ledbyDr.SharadOntaandDr.KeithWest,drewonnationalexpertsincludingNPCMember,AthmaramPandey,Dr.ChetRajUprety,Dr.HariK.Upadhyaya,Dr.IndiraSharma,Dr.KedarP.Baral,Dr.LuciaRusso,Dr.RobinHouston,Dr.ShubhNarayanMahato,JoeSanders,Dr.KirkDeardern,M.R.Maharjan,ShabnamShivakoti,Dr.NaomiSaville,PoojaPandey,SabaMebrathu,SophiyaUprety,Dr.SubarnaKhatry,Dr.Y.B.ThapaandDr.RamChandraBhusal.
Researchgapswereidentifiedundereachresearchdomain.Underthefirstresearcharea,‘improvingdietaryintakeofpoorandmalnourishedwomenandchildren’,discussantsidentifiedtheneedforamorebroadanddistilledunderstandingoftheunderlyingdeterminantsoflineargrowthamonginfantandyoungchildren.Whilematernalnutrition,thequalityandquantityofa
child’sdietandinfectionareknowntoinfluencelineargrowth,interventionsaddressingthesefactorshaveproducedlessthanoptimalchildgrowth,suggestingotherfactorssuchasenvironmentalenteropathiesmightmitigatethegrowthenhancingeffectsofdietonchildgrowth.Non‐Nepalspecificliteraturesupportscorrelationsbetweenstuntingandfactorssuchasmaternaleducation,improvedaccesstohealthcare,maternalhealthandoptimalfeedingbehaviors[5].Butfurtherresearchisneededparticularlyfocusingonmycotoxinandotherenvironmentalexposuresonguthealthandtheirassociationwithchildgrowth.DHS2011datashowsthatstuntingrateshavedecreasedfrom49%to41%,anditisworthexploringthesedatafurthertoidentifypotentialfactorsassociatedwiththisdecline.However,inequalitiespersistacrossagro‐ecologicalzonesinNepal,wherestuntingprevalenceratesamongchildrenresidinginmountainandhillareasare15%to43%higherthanthoselivingintheterai[1].
Therewasagreementthatresearcheffortsshouldfocusonpopulationsinthelowerwealthquintileswhichharborthehighestratesofundernutrition.Therewasalsoagreementabouttheneedtobetterunderstandthedeterminantsofthehighratesofanemiainwomenandchildren,andtherolethatfood‐basedapproachesandfortificationshouldplayinbringingdowntheserates.ResearchconductedinIndiahasshownthatironfortifieddriedmilksignificantlyloweredtheproportionofanemiachildrenrelativetocontrols(19.8%versus50%)among24‐36montholdchildren[6].ResearchisrequiredtodetermineifasimilareffectcanbeachievedinNepalesechildren.Nepal,however,hasfirmevidenceonthebenefitsofmaternaliron‐folicacidsupplementationindecreasingoverall
![Page 35: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
35
anemiaprevalenceinwomen,improvingbirthweightsandchildcognitivefunctionandimprovingchildsurvivalthrough7yearsofage[7‐11].ThesefindingshavebeentranslatedintopolicyandnationalprogramsareinplaceinNepal.Nevertheless,despitesignificantreductionsinanemiaamongstwomen,rateshavestagnatedoverthepastyearandprevalenceofanemiaremainsat35%nearlyhalfofchildrenunder5(46%)areanemicdespitedewormingeffortsandscaleupofmicronutrientpowderprogramswarrantingfurtherresearch.
Finally,thedeterminantsofsevereacutemalnutrition(SAM),thecausesofsevereproteinenergymalnutrition(PEM)andmicronutrientdeficienciesamongstthisagegroupwereallidentifiedasareasoffocusthatwarrantedabetterunderstanding.
Anotherpertinentpointofdiscussionunderthisresearchdomainwastheneedforfurtherexaminationoftheinterplaybetweennutritionandinfection(includingenteropathies).Animalandhumanresearchsuggeststhatwhenconfrontedbyincessantmicrobialchallenge,nutrientsmaybechanneledtomobilizeanear‐continuousimmuneresponseattheexpenseofgrowth.Furtherresearchisneededinthisarea.
Inadditiontotheimmediateconsequencesofundernutritionandspecificmicronutrientdeficiencies,moreworkisneededtounderstandthelong‐termeffectsoftheseconditionsoncognition,schooloutcomesandadulthealth.Finally,investigatingintergenerationaleffectsofpoormaternalnutritionisanimportantresearchpriority,especiallyasitrelatestobirthsize,andsubsequentinfantandchildmalnutrition.
Underthe‘nutritionalgoalsinthehome’researchdomain,apriorityresearchareaishowcommunitiesunderstandandapply(ornot)nutritioninformationandmessagingatthehouseholdlevel.Suchresearchrequiresstudyingthecomponentsofbehaviorchangecommunication,andhoweacheffectsfoodpurchasingdecisionsanddietarybehavior.Anotherimportantresearchgapisidentifyinghowtoovercomehouseholdinformationgapsinnutritionacrossdifferentsocio‐economic,gender,ethnicityandcastegroups.Similarresearchgapsonhygienebehaviormessagingalsorequireattention.
Discussionsonthethirdresearcharea‐‐‘Dietaryfactorsinthehomethatimprovenutritionalconditions’‐‐identifiedtheneedforimprovingourunderstandingofdeterminantsofintra‐householdfoodallocationanditsrelationshipwithdietaryintake.Studiespublishedmorethan10yearsagoprovideevidencethateatingfromasharedplate,andwhoachildsharesfoodwith,caninfluencetheamountandqualityoffoodayoungchildconsumes.Inaddition,muchremainstobelearnedabouthowcommonlyusedcookingandfoodpreparationmethodsinfluencethenutrientcontentofcookedfood.Bothoftheseareaswarrantmoreresearch[12,13].
![Page 36: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
36
Theimportanceofunderstandingthegendergapanddiscriminatorypracticesthatexistatthehouseholdandcommunitylevelthatultimatelyhavebearingonnutritionoutcomeswashighlightedunderthe‘contextualfactorsthatinfluencedietaryadequacy’researchdomain.Tounpackthisrelationship,questionssuchas“howdoesincomegenerationamongstwomeninfluencedietaryadequacy,purchasingpatterns?”wereposedaspotentialareasforfurtherresearch.Othermarginalizedgroupssuchasindigenouspeopleswereidentifiedaspopulationswhosedietaryintakeanddietarypatternsneededtobestudied.GroupssuchastheMadheshisandDalits,especiallythoseinthemountainsandhighhills,havenotbeenstudiedatgreatlengthandperhapslessonscanbelearnedfromthesegroupswithregardtospecial,nutritious,indigenousfoodsandfoodpreparationmethodsused.Theroleofalleviatingpovertyinimprovingnutritionwasalsorecognizedasabroadareaofresearchthatwouldinformtheagriculturetonutritionpathwayasoneoftheprimaryaimsofagriculturalinvestmentsandinterventionsistoimproveeconomicreturnsfromagriculturalproduction.Agrowingareawithinprogrammaticworkistheinvestmentinprogramsthatprovidehomeandkitchengardeninterventionstocontributetomeetingthehouseholds’dailydietary(anddietarydiversity)needs.Theseinterventionsoftentargetwomenandprovideeducationongardeningtechniquesandoccasionallyprovideseedstopromotehomeproductionoffoods.Thisemergingprogrammaticfocuswithanaimtoimprovenutritionstatusestablishedthenextresearchdomain:‘homefoodproduction,storageandprocessingfactorsthataffectdietaryadequacy’.Animportantpointofdiscussionwithinthisdomainwastheneedtodeterminemicronutrientcontentoflocallyavailablecrops,vegetablesandfruitsgrownathome.Commonlypromotedfoodsforhomeandkitchengardensincludegreenleafyvegetableslikespinachandorangefleshvegetables.Poultry‐raisingforeggsaswellasgoat‐raising,assourcesofanimalprotein,arealsofrequentlypromotedpractices.Whileevidencesupportsimprovedintakeofmicronutrientrichfoodsanddietarydiversityofparticipantsinhomefoodproductionprograms,rigorousevaluationsthatstudyimpactofsuchprogramsonnutritionstatusinwomenandchildrenisstilllacking[14].Soilqualityofthesehomegardenswasalsodeterminedtobearesearchtopicofinterest.Soilqualitycanaffectbothsoilproductivityandnutrientcontentandnutrientbioavailabilityofcrops.Ithasbeenshownthatinsubsistencefarmingwheresoilqualityislow,thecontentofproteinandanti‐nutrientsislowerthaninmediumtohighproductivitysoil.[15,16]
![Page 37: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
37
Marketdynamicsandtheireffectsonaccessofhouseholdtofoodcontinuetobeanimportantlinkacrosstheagriculturetonutritionpathway.Discussionsonthedomain,‘marketfactorsthataffecthomefoodsecurity’,capturedopportunitiesforfurtherstudyincludingtopicssuchashowtoengagetheprivatesectortocontributetochangesinhouseholdconsumptionanddietarypractices,determinantsoffoodpurchaseandconsumption,documentingincentivesforagriculturalproductionofindigenousfoodcropandwhetherthisprovidesadequatemotivationoffarmerstoproducethesecrops,householdpurchasingpowerandpatterns,thecost‐effectivenessofgrowingandmarketingcertainnutritiouscropsandlastlymarketdemandforhighvaluecrops.
Finally,thesymposiumparticipantsdiscussedtheresearchdomain:“agriculturalfactorsthataffectmarketprices,availability,andhouseholdaccess”.Knowledgegapsidentifiedincludedtheroleoflivestockandfisheryversustypicalagriculturalinterventionsinpotentiallyimprovingnutritionwithinhouseholds,whatmarketoutletsexistandperfusionofagriculturalproduceinmarkets.Additionalgapsincludedtheneedtoexplorehowtoimproveproductionofstaplecropsacrossecologicalzones,howthere‐designofsomeagriculturaltoolshaveimpactedtimeconstraintsandworkloadoffarmers,howtoimproveproductionofspecializedcropsacrossecozones,whethertechnologiesandcertainseedvarietiescanbeusedacrossecologicalzonesandifso,whethertheseagriculturalapproachescanbescaledup.Acrucialcontributortoimprovedandsustainedagriculturalproductioniswater.Issuessurroundingsustainedwatermanagementapproachestosupportagriculturalproductionandpracticeswerediscussedandidentifiedasareasforfurtherresearch.Giventhesymposium’sfocusonultimatelyimprovingnutritionstatusofwomenandchildren,theroleofmedicinalherbsandoilwerediscussedaspotentialalternativecropinterventionsthatcouldpotentiallycontributeordetractfromdietquality.Theroleofbio‐fortificationofcropswasraised–itspotentialandfeasibilityinNepalanditsefficacyforimprovingnutritionstatus.Beyondagriculturalproduction,issuesfocusedonhomesteadpostharvestfoodlossandfoodpreservationmethodstomaintainnutrientintegrityoffoods.Theseareasrequirefurtherstudy.Auniquetopicthatemergedoutofthisdiscussionwasthepossibilityofdefining,creatingandmeasuringthenutritionaleffectsofa“nutritionfriendly”farmingsystem.TheuseofappropriateresearchdesignsandmethodssurfacedasanoverarchingdiscussionareathroughoutDay2.Acallwasmadefortheuseofmixmethodstostudytheagriculture‐to‐nutritionpathwayandtoquantifylongtermgains(orlosses)ofagricultural
investmentstoaccelerateimprovednutritionoutcomes.Severalparticipantsurgedresearcherstofocusonprogramandimplementationresearch–the“how”ofprogramsandthealsothetrueimpactofprograms.Howareprogramseffectiveinimprovingnutrition?Howisresearchtranslatedintoeffective
![Page 38: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
38
programming?Leroyetal.states“themainconstraintslimitingtheeffectivenessoftheseprogramsincludeproblemsofdesignandintegrationoftheirdifferentcomponents(especiallyoftheirnutritionpackage);thelackofconceptualization,frameworkofanalysis,anddocumentationoftheirpathwaysofimpact;thelackofmeasurementandunderstandingoffacilitatingfactorsandconstraintstoimplementationandsuccess;andtheiroftenweakmonitoringandevaluationdesigns”[4].Theuseofquantitativemethodstoaccuratelymeasureresults,aswellasqualitativemethodstoexplainwhycertainbehaviorchangecommunicationmethodsworkorwhyhouseholdsconsumemoreofacertaincrop,forexamplewerestronglyencouraged.Moreover,deconstructingwhatnutritionspecificornutritionsensitiveinterventionswasbroughtupasanimportantconsiderationgiventhehighuseofsuchterminologyindevelopmentcircles. Takingthisdiscussiononestepfurther,questionsthathadpolicylevelimplicationswereraised.Whataretheproblemsintranslationandimplementationatthepolicylevel?Gapanalysesconductedontheidentificationoftheknowledgeofpolicymakersthemselvesontheagriculture‐nutritionpathwaywasputforthasawaytofacilitatetranslationofresearch.Thislackofinformationwasexpressedbythesymposiumattendeesasnotspecifictopolicymakersalonebutalsoagapthatexistedforsmallholderfarmersandmechanismsforeffectivecommunicationoftechnologicaladvanceswithinagriculture,marketdynamicandnutritionresearchitselfwassuggested.Concernswereraisedaboutlimitedgovernmentsupporttoresearch.Oneparticipantpointedoutthatcurrentlyonly3%ofthecountry’sGDPgoestoagriculturethusitmaynotberealistictothinkthatmuchresearchcanbeproducedwithsuchabudget.However,representativesfromtheNationalPlanningCommission(NPC)statedtheyhaveindeedbeguntoprioritizeresearchthatinformsthispathwaythroughtheireffortsinconsideringatechnicalassistancegrouptoreviewresearchthatwouldcontributetotheimplementationofthemulti‐sectoralnutritionplan.Governmentrepresentativesrequestedresearcherstosimplifyresearchfindingsandinturn,researcherscalledforaforumwheretheycouldinteractwithgovernmentrepresentativestoshareNepalspecificand/orNepalrelevantresearch.Tothisend,asuggestionmadewasforsuchaquarterlyorhalf‐yearlymeetingtobeheldbetweenresearchersandtheconcernedpolicymakers.Additionally,itwassuggestedthatlocalresearchbepublishedininternationalbutespeciallyNepalijournalstoestablishareliabledatabasetodrawformthatcanhelpinformpolicyandimplementationdecisions.Thecreationofamonitoringandevaluationsystemsatthepolicyleveltooverseeimplementationofmulti‐sectoralpoliciesseekingtoaddressnutritionandresearchfindingsbeingtestedinsmallerpilotstudiespriortogoingtoscalewasalsosuggested.
![Page 39: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
39
Ultimately,capacitybuilding–themeasurethroughwhichnationalresearchagendaonthistopiccouldbeachievedwasaddressed.Itwasacknowledgedthatthereareconstraintswithregardstothenumberoftrainednutritionistsand/orresearcherswithstrongmethodologicaltraininginNepal.Atrainedmulti‐disciplinaryteamthathadbeenrecommendedbytheopeningspeakersonDay1ofthesymposiumandbyaudienceonDay2requiresinvestmentbydonorsandGONtoresearchandacademicinstitutions.Audiencemembersstressedtheneedforrigorousresearchdesignsandmethodologiesthatpolicyandprogrammingdecisionsarefirmlybasedonevidenceandnotonspeculationanduntestedassumptions.Therefore,prioritycapacitybuildingareasshouldberesearchmethodologies,surveymethods,datamanagementandanalysis.Itwasalsothoughtthatsuchatrainedworkforcecouldassistinsettingupandmonitoringsurveillancesystems.Anotherareaforcapacitystrengtheningistrainingpolicymakersontheuseofevidenceinpolicyformation,programdesignandtheevaluationofgovernmentprograms.
![Page 40: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
40
NEXTSTEPS
TheNutritionCRSP“Agriculture,FoodSecurityandNutritioninNepal‐TakingStockandDefiningPriorities”symposiumco‐hostedbyJohnsHopkinsBloombergSchoolofPublicHealthandtheDepartmentofCommunityMedicineandPublicHealth,IOMwasoneofthefirsteventsofitskindtobringtogethertheresearchcommunityprimarily,aswellasgovernmentofficialsandprogramimplementerstotakestockoftheresearchthatexistsinNepalcurrentlyacrosstheagriculturetonutritionpathway.ThepresentationsandpostersshowcasedduringtheeventwerebynomeansrepresentativeofallresearchconductedinNepalthatwouldinformthispathway.However,basedonthepresentationsprovidedduringDay1,themoreglaringgapthatsurfacedwasthattherewaslittleresearchthatlinkedacrossallthreedomainsandeventheresearchthataddressedmorethanonedomaindidnotalwayscapturestronglinkagesbasedonmethodsusedoroutcomesmeasured(Figure12).
FIGURE12
![Page 41: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
41
Basedondiscussionsthattranspiredthroughoutthesymposium,thesymposiumorganizingcommitteeidentifiedthefollowingpriorityactionsasrecommended“nextsteps”fortheNepalresearchcommunity:
Formacross‐disciplinaryworkinggroupcomposedofestablishedresearchersfromeachrelevantsector—agriculture,economics,marketing,foodsecurity,dietaryintake,publichealthandnutrition—toidentifythekeyresearchquestionsthatneedtobeaddressedinthenext3,5and10yearstoinformtheagriculture‐to‐nutritioncausalpathway.Eachsectoralexpertcouldprioritizeresearchinhis/herdomain,butconsensusshouldbeachievedoncross‐disciplinaryresearchandresearchthataddresseslinkagepointsacrosssectors.Securingdonorsupportforboththisinitialprocess,butalsoforfundingtheresearchprioritiesrecommendedbytheworkinggroup,shouldbeprioritized.
Conductefficacy(i.e.underoptimalconditions)andeffectiveness(underreal‐lifeandprogrammaticconditions)researchonpromisingandrelevantinterventions.Inaddition,aresearchagendaforunderstandinginterventiondelivery,reachanduptakeisneeded.Thisissometimesreferredtoas“implementationresearch”orunderstandingtheconditionsnecessaryforeffectivelarge‐scaleprogramimplementation.
Establishcommunity‐basedsurveillancesitesinthemajoragro‐ecologicalzonesinNepalto(i)providelongitudinalmeasuresoftrendsandchangesovertimeinfoodavailability,accessandutilization,andrelatethemtohouseholdfoodsecurity,dietaryintakeandnutritionandhealthstatus,and(ii)generateempiricalevidenceaboutintegratedagricultureandotherfoodandnutritionprograminterventionshaveaneffectonnutritionandhealthoutcomes.ThisshouldbeapriorityareafortheNutritionCRSP.
Organizeabi‐annualorannualforumforpolicymakersfromtheNPC,MoACandMoHPandresearcherstodiscussandtranslateresearchfindingsthatpertaintoimprovementofnutritionstatusthroughamulti‐sectoralapproach.
Organizeanannualscientificsymposiumor“evidencesummit”tofacilitatetherapidsharingoffindingsandinnovativesolutions.
![Page 42: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
42
APPENDIX
SESSION1‐ABSTRACTS
1.1HOUSEHOLDCONSUMPTIONOFGRAINLEGUMESINNEPALTERAI:ASTUDYONIMPACTOFIMPROVEDTECHNOLOGIES.RKNEUPANE,NSTHAKUR,PJHA,DNPOKHAREL,BPMAHATOANDRASAH.FORWARDNepal,BharatpurChitwan,andNARCSinghdurbarPlazaKathmandu,Nepal.Emailaddressofcorrespondingauthor:[email protected]
Background:Grainlegumesplayimportantrolesinthenutritionofthepoorersectorsofsocietywhocannotaffordexpensiveanimalproteinfoodsintheirdailydiets.However,againstasteadydecliningtrend,dailydietaryintakeofpulsesvariesacrossruralhouseholds,andlittletodatehasbeendocumentedontheimpacttechnologyinterventions,suchaswiltresistant/tolerantvarietiesofpulses,croprotationandseedtreatmenthavehadonhouseholdlegumeconsumption.Aims:ToestimatethechangesindailydietaryintakeofpulsesbyruralTeraihouseholdsasaresultoftechnologyinterventions.Methods:Householddietaryintakesurveyswereconductedbeforeand36monthsafteraprojectinterventionthatintroducedwilttolerant/resistantvarietiesoflentil(LensculinarisMedic),chickpea(CicerarietinumL)andpigeonpea(CajanuscajanL.Millsp)alongwithcroprotationandfungicidalseeddressingoptionsintofourdistricts‐Banke,Bardia,DangandKanchanpur,locatedinthemidandfarwesternterai.Atotal30householdswererandomlyselectedfromeachprojectareaofthefourdistricts(totalN=~120).Asemi‐structuredquestionnairewasdeveloped,pretestedandusedandachecklistwaspreparedforfocusgroupdiscussions(FGD).Secondarydataonareaandproductivityofpulsesinprojectdistrictswereobtainedfrompublishedreportsoflineagencies.DatawereanalyzedusingSPSS.Results:Theaverageproductivityoflentil,chickpeaandpigeonpeaincreasedbyabout15,59and48%respectivelyoverthebaseyear.Householdconsumptionofpulseswashigherafterprojectinterventioninallfourdistricts.Averageconsumptionofpulsesbeforeprojectinterventionwasonly2kg/capita/annumandtheconsumptionlevelincreasedto13.5kg/capita/annumafterprojectintervention.Thelevelofconsumptionvariedbylandholdings.Householdswithmorethan2haoflandshowedanaverageconsumptionof19.7kg/capita/annum,whileonly7.5kg/capita/annumwerereportedfromhouseholdsowninglessthan0.5ha.Afterprojectintervention,productivityincreasesofpulseswerehigherinsmallerthaninlargerfarms.However,thecashneedsofsmallerfarmerscompelledthemtoselltheproduceinmarket,resultinginlowerhouseholdconsumption.Conclusion:Technologyinterventionislikelytoimprovepulseproductivityatthehouseholdlevel.Increasesindietaryintakeofpulseshavebeenrecordedirrespectiveofhouseholdsizes,althoughfarmerswithlargerholdingstendedtoincludemorepulsesintheirdailydiets.
![Page 43: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
43
1.2EFFECIENCIESINLINKINGAGRICULTURALDEVELOPMENTWITHHEALTHANDNUTRITIONTRAININGINNEPAL.L.COLAVITOANDM.PARIYAR.InternationalDevelopmentEnterprises,Kathmandu,NepalEmailaddressofcorrespondingauthor:[email protected]
Background:USAIDsupportedapilotprogramforhealthandnutritiontrainingforpregnantwomenandmotherswithchildrenlessthan5yearsold(2006‐9)thatwerefrom14,161targetedhouseholdsfromtheSmallholderIrrigationMarketInitiative.
Aims:Toassessthebenefitsoflinkinghealthandnutritiontraininginimprovementsinhealthandnutritionalindicatorsandcosteffectiveness.
Methods:ComparisonfromrandomizedbaselineandannualimpactsurveyswereconductedfortargetedHHsandforcontrolgrouphouseholds.ControlgroupsincludedbothSIMIprojecttargetedhouseholdsthatdidnotreceivethehealthandnutritiontrainingandcontrolhouseholdsthatdidnotbenefitfromSIMIorsimilarprojects.
Results:Theprogramshowedstrongstatisticallysignificantbenefitsfromlinkingagriculturetrainingandhealthandnutritiontrainingforavarietyofmeasuresforimprovedhealthandnutritionincludingincreasedcaloriesconsumed(329perday),increasedproteinconsumption(7.5gperweek),moremeals(2.5perweek),andsubstantialdecreasesintheincidencesofdiarrheaandpneumonia.Theprogramachievedtheseresultsatanadditionalcostofabout$50perHHs.
Conclusions:Theresultsshowstrongbenefitstolinkingagriculturedevelopmentandhealthandnutritiontrainingprograms.Thebenefitsincludetheabilitytochangebehaviorashouseholdsareincreasingincome,increasedconsumptionthroughincreasedincomesandagriculturalproductivityofnutritiousfoods,andhouseholdsinvestingmoreforbetterhealthcare.Theprogramalsoshowedthecosteffectivenessofaddinghealthandnutritiontrainingtoanongoingprogramthathadalreadysociallymobilizedcommunitiesforagriculturaldevelopment.
![Page 44: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
44
1.3HIGHIMPACT.INTEGRATEDAPPROACHESFORIMPROVEDFOODSECURITYANDNUTRITIONOFRURALPOOR.JOESANDERS,COP,USAID/NepalFloodRecoveryProgram.Emailaddressofcorrespondingauthor:[email protected]:FoodinsecurityandmalnutritionarehighestintheFarWestregionofNepal,where82percentofhouseholdsinprogramworksitesaresubsistencefarmerswithhighfoodinsecurity.Objective:Improvetheaffordability,accessibility,andavailabilityofnutritiousfoodtoruralhouseholdsthroughintegratedcommercialagriculture,nutrition,andinfrastructureinterventions.Conceptualframework:Themultifacetedcausesofpoverty,foodinsecurity,andmalnutritionmustbeaddressedbyapproachesthatrecognizetheinterrelationshipsbetweenincomegeneration,foodproductivity,andconsumption.Improvedagriculturalproductivityandcommercializationcandramaticallyincreaseincomes,butcomplementaryinvestmentsinothersectorsarealsorequiredtosustainimpactsandaddressoverallfoodsecuritypriorities.Descriptionofimplementation:Commercialagricultureparticipantscontributesmallplotsoflandtoademonstrationfarmingprogramthatprovidestrainingandcost‐sharedfinancialassistancetopromotehigh‐valuevegetableproductionandimprovedagriculturaltechnologies.Nutritionandhygieneparticipantsfocusisonnutritiousfoodproductionthroughhomegardening.Bothcomponentsprovidetrainingatthehouseholdlevelinenhancednutritionactions,hygiene,andsanitation.Nutritionalimpactismeasuredbothintermsofchangesinfoodconsumptionandbyindicatorssuchasbodymassindex,prevalenceofbreastfeeding,anddietdiversity.Productiveinfrastructureprojectsthatprovidedirectbenefitstoprogramparticipantsarealsosupported.Outcome:CommercialAgriculture:7,536farmers(35%women)assistedon1,780hectares;843shallowtubewellsinstalled;800%increaseinland’seconomicproductivity;320%increaseinhouseholdincomes;225,000person‐daysofsurplusemploymentgenerated.NutritionandHygiene:5,960farmers(75%women)assistedon147hectaresofhomegardens;240modellatrinesand1,715improvedcookingstovesinstalled.ProductiveInfrastructure:131infrastructuresbenefiting837,726people;improvedtransportationaccessfor128,881households;165,106person‐daysoftemporaryemploymentgenerated.Program’simplications:Integratedinterventionsacrosssectorsdeepenimpactsandstrengthensustainability.Understandingfarmers’economicsituations,landholdingsize,andpotentialasproducersiscrucialtodesigningappropriatefoodsecurityinterventions.Co‐investinginimprovedtechnologies,inputs,andagronomicpracticeshelpsmaximizeoutputsandestablishesastrongcapitalbaseforfarmers.Demonstrationfarmingmodelsensurestrongcommitmentsfromfarmers,facilitateplanning,andprovideafirmbasisforestimatingprojectoutcomesandeffectsonthelocalvaluechain.Substantialimprovementsinagriculturalproductionandcommercializationcannotbeachievedwithouttargetedinvestmentsinproductiveinfrastructure.Nutritionawarenessandbehaviorchangetrainingislesseffectivewithoutcoordinatedassistanceinagriculturalproductionandincomegenerationactivities.Adoptionofimprovedagriculturaltechnologiesandnutritionpracticesrequiresanintensivetrainingprogramwithfrequentandconsistentmessagedelivery.
![Page 45: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
45
SESSION2‐ABSTRACTS
2.1APPLICATIONOFTHEHOUSEHOLDECONOMYAPPROACHFORASSESSINGFOODSECURITYANDDESCRIBINGLIVELIHOODSINNEPAL.SAVILLENM1,AKHTERN1,SHRESTHABP2,MANANDHARDS2,OSRIND1,COSTELLOA11
CentreforInternationalHealthandDevelopment,InstituteofChildHealth,UniversityCollegeLondon,UK.2MotherandInfantResearchActivities(MIRA),GPObox921,Kathmandu,Nepal.
Emailaddressofcorrespondingauthor:[email protected]
Background:Improvementofnutritionalstatusthroughbehaviourchangeisonlypossibleifnutrient‐richfoodsareavailableandhouseholdsabletoaccessthem.IntheplainsdistrictofDhanusha,Nepalduring2006,weconductedaHouseholdEconomyApproach(HEA)studyasformativeresearch.Aim:tounderstandthefoodsecurityandlivelihoodsituationofdifferentwealthgroupsinthedistrictsoastodesignbehaviourchangestrategiesthatcouldbepromotedthroughcommunitymobilizationthroughwomen’sgroups.Methods:Weconducted60communityrepresentativeinterviewsand210in‐depthinterviewswithdisaggregatedwealthgrouprepresentatives.Foreachofour60VillageDevelopmentCommitteeclusters,detailedinformationonfoodproduced,marketandotherlinkages,commodityprices,resourcemaps,historicaltimelinesandseasonalityofproduction,migration,labourandmarketpriceswereobtained.Eachwealthgroupwasdescribedintermsofassetscoresandlivelihoodactivities.Wealthgroupinterviewsprovidedestimatesofincome,expenditureandfoodsourcesfora‘typicalhousehold’inthatgroup.Fromannualestimatesofkilosoffoodfromdifferentsources,kilocalorieaccessperpersonperhouseholdinthatwealthgroupwasestimated.Results:Foodproductioninthedistrictishighandmicronutrient‐richvegetables,fruitandanimalfoodsareavailableyearroundexceptinthemonsoon.‘Hungryseasons’precedericeharvests(Sep/OctandMarch/April).Thelandlesspoorestrelyonfoodpurchaseandagriculturallabourexchangetomeettheirbasicfoodneeds,makingthemvulnerabletofoodpriceandlabouravailabilityshocks.Middle/better‐offgroupsgrowstapleandnon‐staplefoodsforconsumptionandsale,andarevulnerabletoshocksaffectingproduction.PoorergroupsrelyonmigratorylabourtoIndia,plusdaily‐wagedlabour,whereasmiddle/better‐offrunbusinesses,haveregularjobsandremittancesfromArabcountriesandMalaysiaforcashincome.Thepoorborrowonunfavourabletermsinordertoaccessjobsoverseas.Quantitativeincomeestimatesweredifficulttostandardisebetweeninterviewsanddidnotmatchexpenditure.Conclusion:TheHEAprovidesrichdetailonlivelihoodpatternsthatmayhelpdesignappropriatenutritionalinterventions.However,indiverseagriculturaleconomiesquantitativeestimatesofkilocalorieintakeandhouseholdincomemaybelessreliable.
![Page 46: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
46
2.2HOMESTEADFOODPRODUCTIONCONTRIBUTESTODIETARYINTAKEAMONGCHILDREN6‐23MONTHSOLDINKALIALIDISTRICT,FARWESTTERAI.DPADHIKARI1,PPANDEYRANA1,DDAVIS1,NSHARMA1,HBCHAND2,RKNEUPANE1.1HelenKellerInternational,NepalCountryOffice,Chakupat‐Patan,Lalitpur,P.O.Box3752,Nepal;2HelenKellerInternational,NepalFieldOffice,Dhangadi,Kailali,NepalEmailaddressofcorrespondingauthor:[email protected]
Issues:LimitedproductionandvarietyoffoodsandknowledgeabouttimelyintroductionofcomplementaryfoodandageappropriatefeedingpracticesarethekeyissuesaffectingthenutritionalstatusofchildrenandmothersinFar‐WesternNepal.Objectives:Toimprovenutritionalstatusofpregnantandlactatingwomenandchildrenlessthantwoyearsofagebyaddressingakeydeterminantofmalnutritionandincreasinghouseholdfoodproductionintheprojectdistricts.Conceptualframework:Knowledge,skills,technicalandmaterialinputs,andcommunitymobilizationleadtoimprovedavailabilityandincreasedconsumptionofnutritiousfoods.Programdesignanddescription:TheUSAIDsupportedActionAgainstMalnutritionthroughAgriculture(AAMA)Project,wasdesignedtoincreasefoodavailabilityanddiversificationthroughhomesteadfoodproduction(HFP)in4632householdswithpregnantwomenandmotherswithchildrenundertwo.BeneficiariesreceivedtraininginHFP,seeds/seedlingsandpoultrychicks.Processevaluationmethods:Acommunity‐based,bi‐annuallotqualityassurancesamplingsurveywasconductedusinga24hourrecallquestionnaire(WHO,2010)forassessingtheinfantandyoungchildfeedingpracticesusingthesevenrecommendedfoodgroups;recordedbyagegroupandconsumption.SPSSversion18.0wasusedtoanalyzedata.CrosstabulationandbivariteanalysiswereusedtoassesstheminimumdietarydiversityinrelationtotheHFPexposurestatus,andmotherswhoknewtimelyintroductionofcomplementaryfood,ageappropriateamountandfrequencyoffeeding.Results:Vegetablevarietiesincreased(3.8±1.9inJanuary2009,4±2.3inAugust2010,8±3.6inFebruary2011and7±3.1inAugust2011)andtheaveragevegetableproductionwithintheprevioustwomonthsincreasedfrom74kg/HHatbaseline(January2009)to175kg/HH(February2011).InAugust2011,mid‐monsoon,theproductiondroppedto123kg/HH.ThemeaneggproductionHH/weekincreasedfrom2.4eggsperhouseholdinAugust2010to5.7inAugust2011.Dietarydiversity,includingconsumptionofvitaminAandironrichplantsourcesandeggs,wassignificantlyhigheramongchildren6‐23monthsfromHFPinterventionhouseholds(p<001).Dietarydiversityofchildrenage6‐23monthswassignificantlyhigheramongthosewhosemothersknewwhentointroducecomplimentaryfeeding(71.7%)thanthosemotherswhodidn’tknow(36.7%).Dietarydiversityofchildrenage6‐23monthswassignificantlyhigheramongthosewhosemothersknewaboutageappropriatefeedingfrequency(82.0%)versusamongthosewhosemotherdidn’tknow(42.7%)(p<001).Programimplications:ThesefindingsdemonstratethatimprovedHFPandknowledgemayleadtoimprovedinfantfeedingpracticesandadditionaldemonstrationstudysitesarewarranted.
![Page 47: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
47
2.3FOODSECURITY,FOODPRICEANDINCOMETRENDSINDHANUSHADISTRICT,NEPALBETWEEN2005AND2011.SHRESTHABP2,AKHTERN1,MANANDHARDS2,OSRIND1,COSTELLOA1,SAVILLENM1.1CentreforInternationalHealthandDevelopment,InstituteofChildHealth,UniversityCollegeLondon,UK.2MotherandInfantResearchActivities(MIRA),GPObox921,Kathmandu,Nepal.Emailaddressofcorrespondingauthor:[email protected]
Background:Householdfoodsecurityisdeterminedbyavailability,accessandutilisationoffood.AlthoughtheTeraiisNepal’s‘breadbasket’,thepoorlackaccesstofoods.Hence,inDhanushadistrict,MIRA/UCLmonitoredfoodsecurityandrelatedfactorsbetween2005‐6and2011aspartofprospectivesurveillanceofhouseholdswithrecentlydeliveredwomen.Aims:Ourobjectivesweretounderstand:a)howhouseholdfoodinsecuritywasexperiencedinrelationtoanxietyabout‐,insufficientqualityof‐andinsufficientquantityof‐food;b)whowasaffectedbyfoodinsecurity;andc)whetherthefoodpricecrisisaffectedfoodsecurity.Methods:Weused3standardizedmonitoringtoolswithrecentlydeliveredwomenbetweenSeptember2006andJune2011.‘HouseholdDietaryDiversityScore’(HDDS)‐and‘MonthsofAdequateHouseholdFoodProvisioning’(MAHFP)‐datawerecollectedfromSep2006toJun11in>35,000households.‘HouseholdFoodInsecurityAccessScale’(HFIAS)datawerecollectedin4,084householdsSept2006toMay2007andin11,039householdsNov2009toJune2011.Wemonitoredfoodpricesfor66itemsin48‐53marketsinDhanushain2005‐6,2008,2009andcompared2006and2008ratesfordifferentincomes.Results:AllfoodinsecuritymeasuresimprovesteeplywithassetquintileandDalitssufferworst.ComparingNov‐June2005‐6,2009‐10and2010‐11foodinsecurityindicatorsimprovedforasfollows:HFIAS3.8,2.4,1.9;anxietyaboutfoodaccess63%,41%,34%;insufficientfoodquality52%,36%,31%;insufficientfoodintake24%,15%,11%;HDDS4.3,4.5,4.8foodgroups;MAHFP10.2,10.4,10.5months;moderately/severelyfoodinsecure39%,24%,19%andinthepoorestquintile70%,53%,48%.Householdswithaccesstoremittanceincomesincreasedonaverage36%,48%,52%andinthepoorestquintile16%,31%,32%.Incomeratesincreasedby33%forlabor,26%forsalariedjobsand22%frombusinesses2006‐8.Foodpricesincreased32.6%2005‐8and25.2%2008‐9.Conclusion:Although48%ofpooresthouseholdsinDhanushastillsufferfoodinsecurity,foodsecurityhasimproveddespitethefoodpricecrisis.Effectsofpriceincreasesseemtohavebeenbufferedbysalaryincreasesandincreasingaccesstoremittanceincomes.
![Page 48: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
48
2.4VALIDATINGDISTRICT‐LEVELASSESSMENTWITHSURVEYDATA:EXAMPLEFROMTHENEKASP,WORLDFOODPROGRAMMEEmailaddressofcorrespondingauthor:Mariko.Kawabata@wfp.orgFoodsecurityinNepalischaracterizedbyahighvariability:notabledisparityisfoundwithinrespectiveregionsanddistricts,aswellasamongdifferentpopulationgroups,whichmakesthefoodsecuritymonitoringcomplexandchallenging.TheNepalFoodSecurityMonitoringSystem(NeKSAP)employsdifferentdatacollectionmethodstoassessandmonitorthefoodsecuritysituation,deliveringreliableandtimelyinformation.ThepresentationillustrateshowthedifferentdatacollectionmethodscomplementeachothertoachievethebestresultunderpracticallimitationsinvolvedinfoodsecuritymonitoringinNepal.TheNeKSAPemploystwokeydatacollectionmethods:phaseclassificationapproachbytheDistrictFoodSecurityNetworks(DFSNs);andrepeatedcross‐sectionalsurveys.TheDFSNs,formedbystaffandrepresentativesfromdistrict‐basedorganizationsandinstitutions,assessandmonitorthefoodsecuritysituationintheirrespectivedistrictsbasedonstandardizedfoodsecurityphaseclassificationapproach.TheinformationisdisaggregatedtoVDC‐levelandupdatedbyseason(quarterly/bi‐annually).Householdsurveyisconductedacrossthecountry,designedtomonitorthefoodsecuritysituationbyecologicalbeltorsub‐regionbyseasonandyear.InformationgatheredbytheDFSNsisvalidatedusingtheNeKSAPhouseholdsurveydatathroughexaminingthedegreeofhouseholdfoodsecuritybyrespectivefoodsecurityphaseasclassifiedbytheDFSNs.EvidenceshowsthatkeyfoodsecurityindicatorsfromthehouseholddataconfirmthedegreeoffoodinsecurityreportedbytheDFSNs.
![Page 49: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
49
SESSION3‐ABSTRACTS
3.1NUTRITIONINTERVENTIONSTHATIMPROVECHILDANDMATERNALHEALTHANDSURVIVAL:FINDINGSFROMTRIALSINTHETERAIOFNEPAL(EXPANDEDABSTRACT)KEITHP.WEST,JR.,SUBARNAK.KHATRY,PARULCHRISTIAN,ROLFD.W.KLEMM,JOANNEKATZ,LUKEMULLANY,STEVENC.LECLERQ,JAMESM.TIELSCH.TheNepalNutritionInterventionProject‐Sarlahi(NNIPS),CenterforHumanNutritionandDepartmentofInternationalHealth,JohnsHopkinsBloombergSchoolofPublicHealth,Baltimore,Maryland,USA21205Emailcorrespondingauthor:[email protected]
Background:Nutritionaldeficienciesstemfromadietchronicallyinsufficienttosupporthealthanddevelopment,includinghostdefensestoinfectionandotherenvironmentalstresses.Pregnancy,infancyandearlychildhoodareperiodsofgreatestriskofdeficiencywithpotentialshortandlongtermhealthconsequences.Communityresearchcanrevealthehealthimpactofsupplementingorimprovingthedietinapopulationandprovideabasisforpreventiveprogramsandpolicies.Methods:TheNepalNutritionInterventionProject‐Sarlahi(NNIPS)waslaunchedin1988byJohnsHopkinsUniversityandtheNepalNetraJyotiSangh,withUSAIDsupport,toconductmicronutrientdeficiencypreventionresearchthatwouldinformhealthpoliciesandprogramsinNepal.SarlahiDistrictwaschosenbasedonitscomparabilitywithnumerousfeaturesintheTerai.Keyfindingsfromthefollowingfieldtrialsandassociatedstudiesaresummarized:NNIPS‐1(1989‐92,n=28,630)assessedtheefficacyofperiodic,high‐dosevitaminAinreducingpreschoolchildmortality;NNIPS‐2(1994‐7,n=44,646women/22,189pregnancies)assessedtheimpactofprovidingarecommendeddietaryallowance(RDA)ofvitaminA,eitherpreformedorasbeta‐carotene,towomenonaweeklybasisbefore,duringandafterpregnancyonmaternalandinfantmortality;NNIPS‐3(2000‐1,n=4926pregnantwomen)evaluatedagainstacontroltheeffectsofantenatalsupplementationwithiron,iron+folicacid,iron+folicacid+zincora14‐nutrientsupplementonbirthsize(allgroupsreceivinganRDAofvitaminA);afollow‐upstudyofthesethreecohorts,fundedbytheGatesFoundation,in2006‐8(n=~55,000childrenandmothers)examinedlong‐termeffectsofearlylifeinterventionsonchildren;and,NNIPS‐4(2001‐6,n=41,276)studiedtheefficacyofdailyzinc,ironorbothinreducingmorbidityandmortalityinchildren1to35monthsofage.Results:NNIPS‐1revealedthatvitaminAcouldreducepreschoolchildmortalityby30%[17]which,withsimilarfindingsfromatrialinJumla[18],providedevidenceforNepal'svitaminAprogramwhichhaspreventedatleast120,000childdeathsinthepastdozenyears.TheNNIPSfollow‐upstudyalsofound,byages15‐23years,thatvitaminAhadreducedhearinglossassociatedwithmiddleearinfectionby42%[19],attributedtoareductioninseverityofinfection.VitaminAgivenatbirthmayalsoreduceinfantmortality.InBangladesh[20],India[21]andIndonesia[22],newbornvitaminAhasbeenshowntolowermortality<6monthsofageby~20%,aninterventionbeingpilotedinNepal.
![Page 50: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
50
NNIPS‐2reducedmortalityrelatedtopregnancybyanaverageof44%witheithermaternalvitaminAorbeta‐carotenesupplementation[23].Maternalsupplementationalsoreducednightblindness[24]andmaternalmorbidity[25]buthadnooveralleffectoninfantmortality[26].At9‐12yearsofage,however,thefollow‐upstudyrevealedgreaterlungcapacity(byspirometry)amongchildrenborntovitaminAsupplementedmothers[27],likelybyimprovingfetallungdevelopment[28].Therewerenoeffectsonbloodpressureorcognitionofoffspring.EpidemiologicalfindingsrevealedmaternalnightblindnesstobeamajorriskfactorformaternalvitaminAdeficiency,undernutrition,morbidityandmortalityduringandlongaftertheendofpregnancy[29,30].DuringNNIPS‐3,motherswerefoundtobelow‐to‐deficientinmultiplemicronutrients15,raisingconcernthatmulti‐nutrientsupplementsmaybeneededduringpregnancyorlactationintheabsenceofdietaryadequacy.However,thetrialshowedvariedeffects:Folicacidalonehadnoeffectonbirthweight[31]butsignificantlyreducedpreterminfantmortality[9].Addingironreducedanemiainthisiron‐deficientsetting,andriskoflowbirthweightby16%[32].Addingzinctothesupplementreversedeffectsofiron.Themultiplemicronutrientsupplementalsoreducedriskoflowbirthweight,by14%,comparabletothatseenwithfolicacid‐ironalone[9],butconveyednosurvivaladvantageforinfants[32].Longerfollow‐upstrengthenedthecaseforantenatalfolicacid‐ironsupplementuse:Byage6‐8yearsofage,childrenborntofolicacidsupplementedmotherswere~40%lesslikelytohaveabnormalkidneyfunction(bymicroalbumintocreatinineratio)andearlybiomarkerindicationsofmetabolicsyndrome[33].Morestrikingly,childrenborntomothersreceivingironwithfolicacidinpregnancyweremorelikelytosurvivethepreschoolyears[10]andperformbetteroncognitivetests[34].Theseeffectswerenotseenwithamultiplemicronutrientsupplement.Itisunlikelythatfoodbasedapproacheswill,inthenearfuture,assureadequatedietaryintakesofbioavailableiron,indicatingthatantenatalfolicacid‐ironsupplementationremainastandardofcareforachievingmaternaladequacyinthesenutrientsinNepal.NNIPS‐4standsasoneoftwocommunitybasedtrials(theotherinZanzibar)thatassessedeffectsofdailyzincorironsupplementationonchildsurvival.InNepal,dailyzincsupplementusehadnoeffectoninfantmortalitybutexertedanon‐significant20%reductioninmortality>12monthsofage[35].However,becausebothtrialsinNepalandZanzibarwerecomparableindesign,underlyingrisksandeffectestimates,datafrombothwerepooledtorevealasignificantoverallmortalityreductionof18%[35].Whiletheevidenceismarginaltopromoteuniversal,dailyzincsupplementationforchildsurvival,thefindingsareconsistentwithknowneffectsofzincinreducingprevalence,severityandsubsequentincidenceofdiarrhea,andemphasizeitsimportanceintreatingdiarrhea[36].Twoepidemiologicalstudiesreveallikelybenefitsof(a)earlyexclusivebreastfeedingand(b)theimportanceofguidingmealconsumptionpatternstoassureadequateintakesbychildrenathome.Inthefirst,adose‐responserelationshipwasobservedbetweenthenumberofhoursinwhichbreastfeedingwasdelayedandriskofneonatalmortality,suggestingthat19%ofallneonataldeathsinruralNepalcouldbeavertedbyinitiatingbreastfeedingwithinthefirsthouroflife[37].Inthesecond,ananthropologicalstudyshowedthattheoddsoftoddlersconsumingavarietyofnutritiousfoodswas1.5to12timeshigherifthechildhadsharedaplatewithanoldersiblingratherthaneatalone[38].Sharingaplateatmealtimewithanolderfemalewasmoreadvantageoustothechildthanwithanoldermale.
![Page 51: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
51
Conclusions:Communityresearchcanprovideevidencefornutritionprogramdecisions:PreschoolvitaminAsupplementationcontinuestoprotectlives,sightandhealthofchildren.SupplementationshouldcontinueuntilsuchtimethatadequatedietaryvitaminAintakeandstatusinthepopulationisassured.AmaternaldietadequateinvitaminAwilllikelyhelpreducesriskofmaternalmortalityinNepal,helpcontrolriskofnightblindness.Pregnantandlactatingwomenshouldbeaskedaboutnightblindness,providedlowdosevitaminAifpositive,andofferedgeneraldietaryandhealthcareguidance.Amongothernutrients,antenatalfolicacidandironassuresasubstantialpublichealthimpactforbothmotherandchildinNepal,forwhichthereispresentlynoadequatedietaryalternative.Amultiplemicronutrientsupplementmaynotaddfurtherpublichealthbenefit,forwhichmoreresearchmaybeneeded.Zincsupplementationisacriticaladjuncttreatment(withoralrehydration)fordiarrhea,andcouldreduceunder‐fivemortalityifintakeisincreaseduniversally,preferablythroughfoodbasedstrategies.Immediateandexclusivebreastfeedingcanlikelyreduceneonatalmortality.And,foodbasedstrategieswillneedtoalsoguideintrahouseholdmealpracticestoassuredietaryadequacyinyoungchildren.
![Page 52: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
52
3.2GROWTHANDHEALTHOFRURALCHILDRENIN3DISTRICTSOFNEPAL:EFFECTOFACOMMUNITYDEVELOPMENTINTERVENTION.LCMILLER*#,RSHRESTHA^,MLOHANI#,PSINGH#,PSUBBA^,DTHAPA^,SNMAHATO#,NJOSHI#*TuftsUnivSchofMedicine,Boston,MAUSA;^NepalTechnicalAssistanceGroup,Kathmandu,Nepal;#HeiferInternational,Kathmandu,NepalEmailaddressofcorrespondingauthor:[email protected]:Morethan50%ofchildreninNepalaremalnourished.Economicgrowthandpovertyreductionarenotalwayssufficienttoimprovethehealthandnutritionalstatusofchildren.Becausechildhealth/nutritionarevitalcornerstonesofcommunitydevelopment,HeiferNepalconductedalongitudinalrandomizedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheeffectsofitsprogramsontheseimportantoutcomes.Aims:(1)systematicallyassesseffectsofHeiferactivitiesonchildhealthandnutritionalstatus;(2)delineatecharacteristicsoffamiliesandchildrenaffectingthese(andother)outcomes.Studydesign:6communitiesin3districtsofNepal[Chitwan/Nawalparasi(Terai),Nuwakot(hills)],werepair‐matchedforspecificcharacteristicsandthenrandomlyassignedtoreceiveHeifercommunitydevelopmentactivitiesatbaseline(INT)orat1year(CON).Atbaseline,6,12,18,and24months,a125‐itemquestionnaireaddressingfamilydemographics,SES,diet,andchildhealth/nutritionwascompletedineachhousehold,alongwithchildgrowthmonitoring.Results:By12months,2903individualsin430householdswereenrolled,including528children6mo‐8yrs.INTandCONcommunitieswereequivalentforbaselineand12monthsSES,householdsize,land/animalownership,andchildnutrition/health,butthereweremarkeddifferencesbetweenTeraiandhilldistricts.At12months,TeraiINTgrouphadimprovedchildweight(p=.04),height(p=.05),andreducedsickdays(p=.01),aswellasincreasedhouseholdincome(p=.004),animal(p=.04)andlandownership(p=.04)comparedtoCON.SignificantimprovementswerenotedinsanitationpracticesinINTgroupat12months(p<.01).Childhealthandnutritionstronglycorrelatedwithage.Conclusions:Significantimprovementsat12monthsinmanyindicatorswerenotedinTeraibutnothillsINTvs.CON.Familyclusteringandotherhouseholdcharacteristicslikelyaffectoutcomesofcommunitydevelopmentinterventions.Extendedfollow‐upwillbeimportanttofurtherunderstandfactorsaffectingchildoutcomesandidentifyspecifictargetsforimprovement.
![Page 53: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
53
3.3IMPACTSOFCHANGESINGRAINPULSE(LEGUME)CONSUMPTIONONMICRONUTRIENTSUPPLYOFRURALWOMENINNEPALANDNORTHINDIA.PANDERSEN,DepartmentofGeographyandRKChandyo,CentreforInternationalHealth,UniversityofBergen,Norway.Emailaddressofcorrespondingauthor:[email protected]:AnimportantfoodsystemchangeinSouthAsia,isthereductionofpulses(legumes)inthedietsoverthelastfourtofivedecades,duetostagnantagriculturalproduction.Thereasonsforstagnantpulseavailabilityincludelowpriorityinresearchanddevelopmentandagriculturalincentives,anddepletionofsoilmicronutrientsandrhizobiumduetoagriculturalintensification.Thepercapitaconsumptionofpulseshasdeclinedbymorethanhalf.Forruralandpoorpeople,pulseshaveprimarilybeenreplacedbystaplegrains,notbyanimalsourcefoods,leadingtoreducedmicronutrientdensity.ThepaperisbasedontheFOSRINprojectwhichstudiedricebean(Vignaumbellata)inparticular.Aims:Pulsesareoftenseenasasourceproteinforpoorand/orvegetarianpopulations.Weinvestigatetheroleofpulsesinpreventionofmicronutrientsufficiency–“hiddenhunger”.Methods:Dietaryrecallsof800ruralwomenofreproductiveageinNepalandNorthIndia,wereanalyzedusingtheWorldFood2program.Thedietaryintakeswerecomparedtorecommendedintakevaluestopredictgeneraldeficiencyproblems.Contributionsofdifferentfoodgroupswereassessed.Results:Staplegrainsprovidedabout80%oftheenergy,ricealone62%.Majordeficienciespredictedwerelysine,Ca,K,Fe,vit.A,C,D,folateandB12;theintakesofFeandfolatewereparticularlyinadequateforpregnantwomen.Thepredicteddeficiencies,combinedwiththenutrientdensityofpulsescomparedtostaplegrains,definesthewindowofopportunityforpulses.Themajorcontributionsofpulseswerelysine,Ca,K,FeandBvitaminsotherthanB12.Conclusion:Pulseshaveacentralbutnotsufficientroleinpreventionofhiddenhunger.Thepolicyimplicationsofthestudyincludesifinterventionsshouldbeenrichmentofrice,substitutionwithotherstaples,supplementationorcomplementaryfooditems,includingpulses.
![Page 54: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
54
3.4CORRELATESOFINFANTANDYOUNGCHILDFEEDINGPRACTICESINCHEPANGCOMMUNITY.SUBEDIN,1POUDELS,2RANAT1ANDPAUDELAK3.1NepalPublicHealthFoundation,2KarnaliIntegratedRuralDevelopmentandResearchCenterNepal,3DepartmentofCommunityMedicineandPublicHealth,InstituteofMedicine,TribhuvanUniversityEmailaddressofcorrespondingauthor:[email protected]
Background:Infantandyoungchildfeeding(IYCF)practicesdiffersincommunitiesduetodifferenceinknowledge,healthserviceutilization,culture,andothersocio‐economicfactors.TheobjectiveofthisstudywastoexploreknowledgeandpracticeofChepangmothersonIYCFandtheircorrelates.Methods:AcrosssectionaldescriptivestudywasconductedinChepangcommunityofMakawanpurdistrict.Quantitativemethodologywasusedinwhich360mothersofundertwoyearagechildrenwereselectedrandomly.Logisticregressionanalysisofselectedchildfeedingindicatorswasdonetofindtheirassociationwithsocio‐economicandhealthrelatedfactors.Results:Feedingpracticesofmotherswerefoundbetterthantheirknowledgelevel.About35%hadknowledgeaboutearlyinitiationofbreastfeeding.Exclusivebreastfeedingandintroductionofcomplementaryfoodsattheageofsixmonthswere81%and90%respectively.Literatemotherswerefoundinitiatingbreastfeedingearlythantheilliterate(OR=2.61,95%CI,1.59‐4.27).Growthmonitoringserviceutilizationwasfoundtohavesignificantassociationwithexclusivebreastfeedingpractices(OR=2.75;95%CI,1.30‐5.78).Feedingdiversecomplementaryfoodswasfoundtobeassociatedwithaveragemonthlyfamilyincomeanddurationoffoodsufficiency.Conclusions:FeedingpracticesinChepangcommunitywereassociatedwithhealthandsocioeconomicdeterminants.Someofthefeedingpracticeswerefoundgoodhowever,mealfrequencyforthechildren9‐23monthsofageandfeedingdiversefoodsforchildren6‐23monthswerefoundlowerwhichneedstobeimprovedthroughnutritionawarenessprograms.Qualitativestudiesareneededfurthertoexploretheculturalfactors.
![Page 55: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
55
TITLELISTINGSFORPOSTERPRESENTATIONS
IMPROVEMENTOFWOMEN’SLIVELIHOODS,INCOMEANDNUTRITIONTHROUGHCARP‐SIS‐PRAWNPOLYCULTUREINTERAI,NEPAL.SunilaRai,MadhavK.Shrestha,NabaRajDevkota.InstituteofAgricultureandAnimalScience,Rampur,Chitwan,NepalEmailaddressofcorrespondingauthor:[email protected]
RICESEEDBUSINESSMODELINGANDFOODSECURITY:ACASESTUDYOFKAVREPALANCHOKANDRAUTAHATDISTRICTSOFNEPAL.MeghBahadurNepali1,*,SudeepGautam2,SabitaMohiniAmatyaShrestha2andSanjeevAdhikari21,2SocioeconomicsandAgriculturalResearchPolicyDivision,NARC,Khumaltar,NepalEmailaddressofcorrespondingauthor:[email protected]
HEALTHANDHUMANDEVELOPMENTNEXUSINNEPAL.MukeshKumarMishra*,VinodMishra1,FarhatN.Siddiquie2.*BhopalNIMSCollege,Lalitpur,Nepal,1Departmentofsociology,TribhuwanUniversityNepal2DepartmentOfClinicalNutritionandDietetics,Emailaddressofcorrespondingauthor:[email protected]
![Page 56: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
56
LISTOFPARTICIPANTS
NAME DESIGNATION INSTITUTION
1 MS. AKRITI SINGH SR. NUTRITION COORDINATOR SUAAHARA
2 MS. ALINA MAHARJAN BOARD MEMBER IOM/NPHF
3 DR. ARJUN KARKI VC PAHS
4 MR. ARUN UPRETY BNMT
5 MR. ASHOK BHURTYAL NATIONAL PROFESSIONAL OFFICER WHO
6 MR. ATMA RAM PANDEY JOINT SECRETARY NPC
7 MR. BAL GOPAL BAIDYA SR.RESEARCH ASSOCIATE NEW ERA
8 MR. BASUDEV SHARMA DRISHYAVOLOKAN
9 MS. BASUNDHARA SHER. COLLEGE
10 MR. BED MANI DAHAL ASST. PROFESSOR KATHMANDU UNIVERSITY
11 MR. BHIM SHRESTHA R.MANAGER MIRA
12 MR. BHIM SUNUWAR DRIVER NTAG
13 DR. BIBHUSAN SHRESTHA DOCTOR KUSMS
14 MR. BIJAY K. SINGH CONSULTANT RENAISSANCE SOCIETY NEPAL
15 MR. BIJU K. SHRESTHA PROGRAM DIRECTOR NPCS
16 DR. BIKRAM SHRESTHA MEDICAL DOCTOR KUSMS
17 MS. BIMALA MANANDHAR MIRA
18 MR. BINESH MAN SAKHA SENIOR SCIENTIST NARC (PRP)
19 MR. BINOD KHANAL STUDENT IAAS,RAMPUR,CHITWAN
20 MR. BIRENDRA YADAV ASST. PROFESSOR BPKIHS DHARAN
21 MR. CHARLES ENCISO DIR. OF PROGRAMMING/TRANING PEACE CORPS
22 DR. CHET RAJ PANT VICE CHAIRMAN NNJS
23 DR. CHET RAJ UPRETI PRINCIPAL SCIENTIST NARC
24 DR. CHOP LAL BHUSAL NHRC
25 MR. DARRELL DEPPET CHIEF OF PARTY EIG/WINROCR
26 MR. DAVID C. ATTEBERRY MISSION DIRECTOR USAID
27 MR. DEBENDRA ADHIKARI M &E MANAGER HKI
28 DR. DEBENDRA GAUCHAN SENIOR SCIENTIST NARC
29 MR. DEEPAK THAPA PROGRAM MANAGER NTAG
30 MR. DHANANJAYA POUDYAL FREELANCER
31 DR. DHARMA MANANDHAR PEDIATRICIAN MIRA
32 MR. DURGA PRASAD PAHARI FACULTY IOM
33 MS. DUSHALA ADHIKARI MEMBER PHI
![Page 57: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
57
34 MS. ELISA FACCHINI INTERN USAID EIG
35 DR. GAJANANDA BHANDARI DIRECTOR NPHF
36 DR. GERALD SHIVELY PROFESSOR PURDVE UNIVERSITY
37 MR. HAN KANG DEPUTY DIRECTOR USAID
38 MR. HARI KOIRALA PROGRAM SPECIALIST USAID
39 DR. INDIRA SHARMA PROFESSOR T.U. PADMA KANYA CAMPUS
40 MR. JOE SANDERS USAID‐NFRP FINTRAC
41 MR. JYOTI SHRESTHA COORDINATOR MIRA
42 DR. K.K. LAL AGRONOMY EXPERT R.S NEPAL
43 MR. K.P ACHARYA TECHNICAL MANAGER NTAG
44 DR. KALPANA TIWARI NUTRITION SPECIALIST NTAG
45 MR. KAMAL SHRESTHA M&O SPECIALIST USAID ‐NFRP
46 DR. KANTI LATA BHANDARI CHAIRPERSON IRHDTC/NEPAL
47 DR. KEDAR P. BARAL PROFESSOR PAHS
48 DR. KEITH WEST PROFESSOR JOHNS HOPKINS
49 MS. KENDA CUNNINGHAM RESEARCHER IFPRI
50 MR. KIPP SUTTON AGRICULTURAL OFFICER USAID
51 MR. KIRK DEARDEN DCOP HKI/SUAAHARA
52 MR. KUMAR SANJEL NTAG
53 MR. LILA B. THAPA SENIOR PUBLIC HEALTH OFFICER CHD/DOHS
54 MS. LUEIA RUSSO COORDINATOR ISAS
55 MR. LUIS GUZMAN FOREIGN SERVICE USAID
56 MR. LUKE COLAVITO COUNTRY DIRECTOR IDE
57 MS. LYNN LEDERER CHIEF OF PARTY SUAAHARA
58 MR. M .R MAHARJAN DIRECTOR MI
59 DR. MADAN PARIYAR PD/M &E DIRECTOR IDE NEPAL
60 DR. MADHAV K. SHRESTHA PROFESSOR IAAS/RAMPUR
61 DR. MADHU DIXIT DEVKOTA PROFESSOR IOM
62 MR. MADHUKAR B.SHRESTHA SENIOR PROGRAM MANAGER HKI
63 MS. MANASA THAPA THAKURATHI ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR PADMA KANYA CAMPUS
64 MR. MANDIP RAI PROGRAM OFFICER FAO
65 MS. MANDIRA TAMRAKAR ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR PADMA KANYA CAMPUS
66 MS. MANJITA SHRESTHA NTAG
67 MS. MANODHARA SHAKYA ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR PADMA KANYA CAMPUS
![Page 58: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
58
68 MS. MARIE RUEL IFPRI
69 MS. MARIKO KAWABATA HEAD FSMAV WFP
70 MR. MEGH BAHADUR NEPALI T.OFFICER NARC
71 MS. MONA SHARMA SENIOR OFFICER WINROCK INTL'
72 MR. MUKTI SANJEL DRIVER NTAG
73 DR. NABA RAJ DEVKOTA PROFESSOR IAAS,RAMPUR,CHITWAN
74 MR. NANDA PRASAD SHRESTHA LIV. EXPERT RNS/FAO
75 MS. NAOMI SAVILLE TECHNICAL ADVISOR MIRA/UCL
76 MR. NARAYAN SUBEDI PROGRAM MANAGER NPHF
77 MR. NAVEEN PAUDYAL P.O. NUTRITION UNICEF
78 MR. NAVIN HADA AG. SPECIALIST USAID
79 MS. NEENA JOSHI SENIOR PROGRAM MANAGER HEIFER INTERNATIONAL
80 MS. NICOLE MENAGE REPRESENTATIVE WFP
81 MS. NIRMALA PANDEY AG. FOOD SECURITY COORDINATOR HKI
82 MS. NIRMALA SHARMA PROG.DEV. COORDINATOR CARE
83 DR. P. MISHRA SECRETARY MOHP
84 MS. PASCASIE ADEDZE NUTRITION ADVISOR USAID
85 DR. PATRICK WEBB Dean of Academic Affairs, Friedman School Tufts University
86 MR. PETER ANDERSEN ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN
87 MS. POOJA RANA DIRECTOR OF PROGRAM HKI/SUAAHARA
88 MR. PRADEEP DIXIT DIRECTOR AFFAN
89 MR. PRADIUMNA DAHAL NUTRITION SPECIALIST UNICEF
90 MS. PRAGYA GARTAULLA LECTURER NEPAL INSTITUTE OF HEALTH SCIENCES
92 MR. PRAMOD G.C ASST. PROFESSOR BPKIHS
93 MR. PRAMOD KOIRALA DFTQC
94 MR. PRAVEEN BAIDYA DCOP WINROCK INTL'
95 MS. PREETI SUBBA M&E OFFICER NTAG
96 MS. PUSHPA SHRESTHA PROGRAM OFFICER WFP
97 MR. RADHA KRISHNA PRADHAN PROGRAM DIRECTOR NPC
98 MR. RADHA SHYAM CHAUDHARY NUTRITION COORDINATOR USAID/NFRD (FINTRAC)
99 MR. RAJAN PAUDEL LECTURER IOM
100 MR. RAJU KANDEL CONSULTANT CHEMONICS
101 DR. RAM CHANDRA BHUSAL
VALUE CHAIN/MARKETING SPECIALIST CEAPRED
102 MR. RAM GUPTA USAID/NFRP
103 DR. RAM K. CHANDYO RESEARCHER IOM
![Page 59: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
59
104 MR. RAM KRISHNA NEUPANE PROGRAM DIRECTOR FORWARD NEPAL
105 MR. RAM KUMAR NEUPANE HFPC HKI
106 DR. RAMAN SHRESTHA M & E OFFICER NTAG
107 MR. RAMESH K. ADHIKARI PROFESSOR IOM
108 MS. RITA PRADHAN NTAG
109 DR. RIWAAJ LAMSAL DOCTOR(MED.OFFICER) SAHARA HOSPITAL
110 MR. ROBIN HOUSTON DCOP NFHP
111 DR. ROLF KLEMM JOHNS HOPKINS
112 MR. RUDRA SHARMA PLANNING OFFICER NATIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION
113 MS. RUPA MAHARJAN NTAG
114 MS. RUPA PANDEY(THAPA) ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR
NEPAL INSTITUTE OF HEALTH SCIENCES
115 DR. S.K KHATRY DIRECTOR NNIPS
116 MS. SABA MEBRAHTU CHIEF NUTRITION UNICEF
117 MS. SABNAM SHIVAKOTI MOAC
118 MS. SAHARAH MOON CHAPOTIN USAID
120 MS. SARAH NISCHALKE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE
121 MS. SHANDA STEIMER DIRECTOR USAID
122 DR. SHARAD ONTA PROFESSOR IOM
123 MS. SHARADA PANDEY SPHA MOHP
124 DR. SHIBA KUMAR RAI HON. MEMBER NPC
125 DR. SHIDDI GANESH SHRESTHA PROGRAM DIRECTOR
DIRECTORATE OF AG.EXTENSION
126 MS. SHIKHA BASNET FREELANCER
127 MR. SHREERAM NEUPANE LECTURER GOLDENGATE COLLEGE
128 MR. SHROCHIS KARKI D.PHIL. STUDENT OXFORD UNIVERSITY
129 MR. SHUBH MAHATO COUNTRY DIRECTOR HEIFER
130 MS. SOPHIYA UPRETY PROGRAM OFFICER WFP
131 MR. STEVE LECLERQ FIELD DIRECTOR/JHUREP NNIPS/JHU
132 MS. STUTI BASNYET USAID
133 DR. SUDEEP SHRESTHA FELLOW JHU
134 MS. SUMI DEVKOTA CONSULTANT DAI
135 MR. SUMIT KARN NPC NS/CHD
136 MS. SUNEETHA KADIYALA RESEARCH FELLOW IFPRI
137 DR. SUNILA RAI ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR IAAS
138 MR. SURYA P. PAUDEL SR. LIVESTOCK OFFICER MUAC
139 MS. SUSHILA RISAL MOH LIAISON OFFICER NTAG/CHD
140 MS. SWETHA MANOHAR RESEARCH ASSOCIATE JHSPH
141 DR. TIRTHA RANA FREELANCER
![Page 60: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
60
142 DR. TRISHNA SHARMA DOCTOR
143 MR. TUYU NARAYAN PACHHAI IEC OFFICER NTAG
144 MR. Y.B.THAPA TEAM LEADER FNSP
145 MS. ZARIN A .PRADHAN M&E USAID EIG
![Page 61: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
61
REFERENCES
1. NepalDemographicandHealthSurvey2011(DHS).,2011,MacroInc&NewEra.2. WHO.CountryHealthSystemProfile.2007[cited2012April30];Availablefrom:
http://www.searo.who.int/LinkFiles/Country_Health_System_Profile_8‐Nepal.pdf.3. FAO,Guidingprinciplesforlinkingagricultureandnutrition:Synthesisfrom10development
institutions,2012,FAO.4. JefLLeroy,M.R.,ElenVerhofstadt,DeannaOlneyTheMicronutirentImpactofMultisectoral
ProgramfocusingonNutrition:Examplesfromconditionalcashtransfer,microcreditwitheducationandagriculturalprograms.2008.
5. Frost,M.B.,R.Forste,andD.W.Haas,MaternaleducationandchildnutritionalstatusinBolivia:findingthelinks.SocSciMed,2005.60(2):p.395‐407.
6. Sazawal,S.,etal.,EffectsoffortifiedmilkonmorbidityinyoungchildreninnorthIndia:communitybased,randomised,doublemaskedplacebocontrolledtrial.BMJ,2007.334(7585):p.140.
7. Stewart,C.P.,etal.,Antenatalsupplementationwithfolicacid+iron+zincimproveslineargrowthandreducesperipheraladiposityinschool‐agechildreninruralNepal.AmJClinNutr,2009.90(1):p.132‐40.
8. Christian,P.,etal.,SupplementationwithmicronutrientsinadditiontoironandfolicaciddoesnotfurtherimprovethehematologicstatusofpregnantwomeninruralNepal.JNutr,2003.133(11):p.3492‐8.
9. Christian,P.,etal.,EffectsofalternativematernalmicronutrientsupplementsonlowbirthweightinruralNepal:doubleblindrandomisedcommunitytrial.BMJ,2003.326(7389):p.571.
10. Christian,P.,etal.,AntenatalandpostnatalironsupplementationandchildhoodmortalityinruralNepal:aprospectivefollow‐upinarandomized,controlledcommunitytrial.AmJEpidemiol,2009.170(9):p.1127‐36.
11. Christian,P.,etal.,Prenatalmicronutrientsupplementationandintellectualandmotorfunctioninearlyschool‐agedchildreninNepal.JAMA,2010.304(24):p.2716‐23.
12. Gittelsohn,J.,Openingthebox:intrahouseholdfoodallocationinruralNepal.SocSciMed,1991.33(10):p.1141‐54.
13. Shankar,A.V.,etal.,EatingfromasharedplateaffectsfoodconsumptioninvitaminA‐deficientNepalichildren.JNutr,1998.128(7):p.1127‐33.
14. LoraIannotti,K.C.,MarieRuel,Improvingdietqualityandmicronutrientnutrition:HomesteadfoodproductioninBangladesh,inIFPRIdiscussionpapers9282009.
15. Brandt,K.,Planthealth,soilfertilityrelationshipsandfoodquality.FAO,2007.16. ChristensenLP,H.‐M.J.,HansenSL,HaraldsdóttirJ,JespersenL,PurupS,KharazmiA,
BarkholtV,FrøkiærH&Kobæk‐LarsenMHealthpromotingcompoundsinvegetablesandfruits.Asystematicapproachforidentifyingplantcomponentswithimpactonhumanhealth.TrendsFoodSci.Techno,2004.15(15):p.384‐393.
17. West,K.P.,Jr.,etal.,EfficacyofvitaminAinreducingpreschoolchildmortalityinNepal.Lancet,1991.338(8759):p.67‐71.
18. Daulaire,N.M.,etal.,ChildhoodmortalityafterahighdoseofvitaminAinahighriskpopulation.BMJ,1992.304(6821):p.207‐10.
19. Schmitz,J.,etal.,VitaminAsupplementationinpreschoolchildrenandriskofhearinglossasadolescentsandyoungadultsinruralNepal:randomisedtrialcohortfollow‐upstudy.BMJ,2012.344:p.d7962.
20. Klemm,R.D.,etal.,NewbornvitaminAsupplementationreducedinfantmortalityinruralBangladesh.Pediatrics,2008.122(1):p.e242‐50.
![Page 62: Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in Nepal-Taking Stock and](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030323/589ee45b1a28ab9a4a8c16fb/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
62
21. Rahmathullah,L.,etal.,ImpactofsupplementingnewborninfantswithvitaminAonearlyinfantmortality:communitybasedrandomisedtrialinsouthernIndia.BMJ,2003.327(7409):p.254.
22. Humphrey,J.H.,etal.,ImpactofneonatalvitaminAsupplementationoninfantmorbidityandmortality.TheJournalofpediatrics,1996.128(4):p.489‐96.
23. West,K.P.,Jr.,etal.,Doubleblind,clusterrandomisedtrialoflowdosesupplementationwithvitaminAorbetacaroteneonmortalityrelatedtopregnancyinNepal.TheNNIPS‐2StudyGroup.BMJ,1999.318(7183):p.570‐5.
24. Christian,P.,etal.,Maternalnightblindnessincreasesriskofmortalityinthefirst6monthsoflifeamonginfantsinNepal.TheJournalofnutrition,2001.131(5):p.1510‐2.
25. Christian,P.,etal.,VitaminAorbeta‐carotenesupplementationreducesbutdoesnoteliminatematernalnightblindnessinNepal.TheJournalofnutrition,1998.128(9):p.1458‐63.
26. Katz,J.,etal.,Maternallow‐dosevitaminAorbeta‐carotenesupplementationhasnoeffectonfetallossandearlyinfantmortality:arandomizedclustertrialinNepal.TheAmericanjournalofclinicalnutrition,2000.71(6):p.1570‐6.
27. Checkley,W.,etal.,MaternalvitaminAsupplementationandlungfunctioninoffspring.TheNewEnglandjournalofmedicine,2010.362(19):p.1784‐94.
28. Massaro,D.andG.D.Massaro,Lungdevelopment,lungfunction,andretinoids.TheNewEnglandjournalofmedicine,2010.362(19):p.1829‐31.
29. Christian,P.,etal.,NightblindnessofpregnancyinruralNepal‐‐nutritionalandhealthrisks.Internationaljournalofepidemiology,1998.27(2):p.231‐7.
30. Christian,P.,etal.,NightblindnessduringpregnancyandsubsequentmortalityamongwomeninNepal:effectsofvitaminAandbeta‐carotenesupplementation.Americanjournalofepidemiology,2000.152(6):p.542‐7.
31. Jiang,T.,etal.,Micronutrientdeficienciesinearlypregnancyarecommon,concurrent,andvarybyseasonamongruralNepalipregnantwomen.TheJournalofnutrition,2005.135(5):p.1106‐12.
32. Christian,P.,etal.,Effectsofmaternalmicronutrientsupplementationonfetallossandinfantmortality:acluster‐randomizedtrialinNepal.TheAmericanjournalofclinicalnutrition,2003.78(6):p.1194‐202.
33. Stewart,C.P.,etal.,Antenatalmicronutrientsupplementationreducesmetabolicsyndromein6‐to8‐year‐oldchildreninruralNepal.TheJournalofnutrition,2009.139(8):p.1575‐81.
34. Christian,P.,etal.,Prenatalmicronutrientsupplementationandintellectualandmotorfunctioninearlyschool‐agedchildreninNepal.JAMA:thejournaloftheAmericanMedicalAssociation,2010.304(24):p.2716‐23.
35. Tielsch,J.M.,etal.,EffectofdailyzincsupplementationonchildmortalityinsouthernNepal:acommunity‐based,clusterrandomised,placebo‐controlledtrial.Lancet,2007.370(9594):p.1230‐9.
36. WHO/UNICEF,Clinicalmanagementofacutediarrhea,2004,UnitedNationsChildren’sFundandtheWorldHealthOrganization:Geneva,Switzerland.
37. Mullany,L.C.,etal.,Breast‐feedingpatterns,timetoinitiation,andmortalityriskamongnewbornsinsouthernNepal.TheJournalofnutrition,2008.138(3):p.599‐603.
38. Shankar,A.V.,etal.,EatingfromasharedplateaffectsfoodconsumptioninvitaminA‐deficientNepalichildren.TheJournalofnutrition,1998.128(7):p.1127‐33.