![Page 1: An Assessment of the Combined Variable Approach: 2 · –Use MS2 data to fit parameters in the CV equation to predict T1 within appropriate range (CV and ) –Use all data to fit](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050306/5f6ef19706b5f6683b2159a4/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
An Assessment of the Combined Variable Approach: 2.0
Yuri Lawryshyn
IUVA Americas Conference, February, 2018
![Page 2: An Assessment of the Combined Variable Approach: 2 · –Use MS2 data to fit parameters in the CV equation to predict T1 within appropriate range (CV and ) –Use all data to fit](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050306/5f6ef19706b5f6683b2159a4/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Objective• Main objective: to test the validity of the combined variable (CV) approach for any general case– Specifically: with all of the checks and balances of the proposed approach, can we find a case where a UV reactor passes all QA/QC criteria yet fails in a some potential real world application?
![Page 3: An Assessment of the Combined Variable Approach: 2 · –Use MS2 data to fit parameters in the CV equation to predict T1 within appropriate range (CV and ) –Use all data to fit](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050306/5f6ef19706b5f6683b2159a4/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Approach of the Presentation• Theory
– Does the CV have any theoretical basis?• Numerical experiments to see if we can “break” the proposed validation methodology utilizing all proposed QA/QC– Theoretical “good” and “bad” reactors– CFD based “good” and “bad” reactors– Theoretical reactor where particle trajectories change with flow rate
– Bioassay uncertainty
![Page 4: An Assessment of the Combined Variable Approach: 2 · –Use MS2 data to fit parameters in the CV equation to predict T1 within appropriate range (CV and ) –Use all data to fit](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050306/5f6ef19706b5f6683b2159a4/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Agenda• Summary of the proposed validation methodology
• Theory of the CV• Methodology• Results• Conclusions
– Proposed methodology (likely) has all of the required checks and balances to ensure appropriate application of the CV approach
![Page 5: An Assessment of the Combined Variable Approach: 2 · –Use MS2 data to fit parameters in the CV equation to predict T1 within appropriate range (CV and ) –Use all data to fit](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050306/5f6ef19706b5f6683b2159a4/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Combined Variable Equation
![Page 6: An Assessment of the Combined Variable Approach: 2 · –Use MS2 data to fit parameters in the CV equation to predict T1 within appropriate range (CV and ) –Use all data to fit](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050306/5f6ef19706b5f6683b2159a4/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Summary of Validation Methodology
• Bioassay test– Two different microorganisms
• E.g. T1 ( ~5mJ/cm ) and MS2 ( ~20mJ/cm )
– UVT range– Flow range– UVC power range (measure )
![Page 7: An Assessment of the Combined Variable Approach: 2 · –Use MS2 data to fit parameters in the CV equation to predict T1 within appropriate range (CV and ) –Use all data to fit](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050306/5f6ef19706b5f6683b2159a4/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Summary of Validation Methodology• Analysis
– Use T1 data to fit parameters in the CV equation to predict MS2 within appropriate range (CV and
)– Use MS2 data to fit parameters in the CV equation to predict T1 within appropriate range (CV and
)– Use all data to fit parameters in the CV equation
• QA/QC for each of the above check plots for fit / issues:– as a function of CV for different UVTs– Actual as a function of Predicted
![Page 8: An Assessment of the Combined Variable Approach: 2 · –Use MS2 data to fit parameters in the CV equation to predict T1 within appropriate range (CV and ) –Use all data to fit](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050306/5f6ef19706b5f6683b2159a4/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Summary of Validation Methodology
• Validated range based on bioassay test range of:– Flow rate– UVT– Combined variable–
![Page 9: An Assessment of the Combined Variable Approach: 2 · –Use MS2 data to fit parameters in the CV equation to predict T1 within appropriate range (CV and ) –Use all data to fit](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050306/5f6ef19706b5f6683b2159a4/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Theory: Reactor Performance• Inactivation of the i‐th path:
• UV reactor performance:1
• UV system log inactivation
1
![Page 10: An Assessment of the Combined Variable Approach: 2 · –Use MS2 data to fit parameters in the CV equation to predict T1 within appropriate range (CV and ) –Use all data to fit](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050306/5f6ef19706b5f6683b2159a4/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Theory: Reactor Performance• Note that
, ,
• If particle trajectories do not change with flow rate then
• where
• and the average normalized intensity per path is
1, ,
![Page 11: An Assessment of the Combined Variable Approach: 2 · –Use MS2 data to fit parameters in the CV equation to predict T1 within appropriate range (CV and ) –Use all data to fit](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050306/5f6ef19706b5f6683b2159a4/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Theory: Combined Variable• Combined variable relationship
/
![Page 12: An Assessment of the Combined Variable Approach: 2 · –Use MS2 data to fit parameters in the CV equation to predict T1 within appropriate range (CV and ) –Use all data to fit](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050306/5f6ef19706b5f6683b2159a4/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Theory: Combined Variable• Reactor performance
/
= · ·
• Combined variable equation
![Page 13: An Assessment of the Combined Variable Approach: 2 · –Use MS2 data to fit parameters in the CV equation to predict T1 within appropriate range (CV and ) –Use all data to fit](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050306/5f6ef19706b5f6683b2159a4/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Methodology• Numerical experiments
– Good and bad theoretical reactors– Good and bad CFD modeled UV reactors– Good and bad theoretical reactors where variance of particle trajectories varies with flow rate
• utilize geometric Brownian motion (GBM) from stock modeling theory
– Bioassay uncertainty
![Page 14: An Assessment of the Combined Variable Approach: 2 · –Use MS2 data to fit parameters in the CV equation to predict T1 within appropriate range (CV and ) –Use all data to fit](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050306/5f6ef19706b5f6683b2159a4/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Methodology• 3 flow rates: 0.25, 0.5, 1.0• 4 UVTs: 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%• 3 power levels: 40%, 70%, 100%• Leads to 36 bioassay tests
– Remove any points where:• 0.25• 6
• Test (all errors reported on absolute LogI):– CV vs LogI: T1 and MS2– T1 to predict MS2 and MS2 to predict T1– CV vs LogI: Combined (T1 and MS2)– Combined CV to predict Adenovirus
![Page 15: An Assessment of the Combined Variable Approach: 2 · –Use MS2 data to fit parameters in the CV equation to predict T1 within appropriate range (CV and ) –Use all data to fit](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050306/5f6ef19706b5f6683b2159a4/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Methodology – Theoretical ReactorsReactor R1 Reactor R2
Dose path 1 radius 6.6 cm 7.5 cmDose path 1 weight 0.6 0.99Dose path 2 radius 10 cm 15 cmDose path 2 weight 0.4 0.01
![Page 16: An Assessment of the Combined Variable Approach: 2 · –Use MS2 data to fit parameters in the CV equation to predict T1 within appropriate range (CV and ) –Use all data to fit](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050306/5f6ef19706b5f6683b2159a4/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Methodology – Theoretical Reactors
![Page 17: An Assessment of the Combined Variable Approach: 2 · –Use MS2 data to fit parameters in the CV equation to predict T1 within appropriate range (CV and ) –Use all data to fit](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050306/5f6ef19706b5f6683b2159a4/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Methodology – CFD Reactors
![Page 18: An Assessment of the Combined Variable Approach: 2 · –Use MS2 data to fit parameters in the CV equation to predict T1 within appropriate range (CV and ) –Use all data to fit](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050306/5f6ef19706b5f6683b2159a4/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Methodology – Variance ~ Flow
![Page 19: An Assessment of the Combined Variable Approach: 2 · –Use MS2 data to fit parameters in the CV equation to predict T1 within appropriate range (CV and ) –Use all data to fit](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050306/5f6ef19706b5f6683b2159a4/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Methodology – Variance ~ Flow
![Page 20: An Assessment of the Combined Variable Approach: 2 · –Use MS2 data to fit parameters in the CV equation to predict T1 within appropriate range (CV and ) –Use all data to fit](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050306/5f6ef19706b5f6683b2159a4/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Results• Good theoretical reactor• Bad theoretical reactor• Variance ~ Flow• Good / bad CFD reactor (summarized in table)
![Page 21: An Assessment of the Combined Variable Approach: 2 · –Use MS2 data to fit parameters in the CV equation to predict T1 within appropriate range (CV and ) –Use all data to fit](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050306/5f6ef19706b5f6683b2159a4/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Results: Good Theoretical Reactor
![Page 22: An Assessment of the Combined Variable Approach: 2 · –Use MS2 data to fit parameters in the CV equation to predict T1 within appropriate range (CV and ) –Use all data to fit](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050306/5f6ef19706b5f6683b2159a4/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Results: Good Theoretical Reactor
![Page 23: An Assessment of the Combined Variable Approach: 2 · –Use MS2 data to fit parameters in the CV equation to predict T1 within appropriate range (CV and ) –Use all data to fit](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050306/5f6ef19706b5f6683b2159a4/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Results: Good Theoretical Reactor
![Page 24: An Assessment of the Combined Variable Approach: 2 · –Use MS2 data to fit parameters in the CV equation to predict T1 within appropriate range (CV and ) –Use all data to fit](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050306/5f6ef19706b5f6683b2159a4/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Results: Bad Theoretical Reactor
![Page 25: An Assessment of the Combined Variable Approach: 2 · –Use MS2 data to fit parameters in the CV equation to predict T1 within appropriate range (CV and ) –Use all data to fit](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050306/5f6ef19706b5f6683b2159a4/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Results: Bad Theoretical Reactor
![Page 26: An Assessment of the Combined Variable Approach: 2 · –Use MS2 data to fit parameters in the CV equation to predict T1 within appropriate range (CV and ) –Use all data to fit](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050306/5f6ef19706b5f6683b2159a4/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Results: Bad Theoretical Reactor
![Page 27: An Assessment of the Combined Variable Approach: 2 · –Use MS2 data to fit parameters in the CV equation to predict T1 within appropriate range (CV and ) –Use all data to fit](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050306/5f6ef19706b5f6683b2159a4/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Results: Variance ~ Flow
![Page 28: An Assessment of the Combined Variable Approach: 2 · –Use MS2 data to fit parameters in the CV equation to predict T1 within appropriate range (CV and ) –Use all data to fit](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050306/5f6ef19706b5f6683b2159a4/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Results: Variance ~ Flow
![Page 29: An Assessment of the Combined Variable Approach: 2 · –Use MS2 data to fit parameters in the CV equation to predict T1 within appropriate range (CV and ) –Use all data to fit](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050306/5f6ef19706b5f6683b2159a4/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Results: Variance ~ Flow
![Page 30: An Assessment of the Combined Variable Approach: 2 · –Use MS2 data to fit parameters in the CV equation to predict T1 within appropriate range (CV and ) –Use all data to fit](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050306/5f6ef19706b5f6683b2159a4/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Results: Summary Table
• Limits: R2<0.95, LogI Error > 0.5
Min Max Min Max Min Max Min MaxGood Theoretical 1.00 1.00 ‐0.15 0.18 ‐0.07 0.10 1.00 ‐0.12 0.24 ‐0.02 0.10Bad Theoretical 0.99 0.98 ‐0.37 0.17 ‐0.30 0.20 0.98 ‐0.39 0.33 ‐0.41 0.18Variance ~ Flow 0.92 1.00 0.13 1.50 ‐2.19 0.05 0.93 ‐1.12 1.17 0.00 0.28Good CFD 1.00 1.00 ‐0.05 0.03 ‐0.04 0.02 1.00 ‐0.05 0.04 ‐0.02 0.03Bad CFD 1.00 1.00 ‐0.04 0.03 ‐0.11 0.07 1.00 ‐0.16 0.07 ‐0.19 0.06Good CFD (s=0.125) 1.00 0.99 ‐0.20 0.20 ‐0.30 0.18 0.99 ‐0.27 0.25 ‐0.30 0.23Good CFD (s=0.25) 0.99 0.97 ‐0.38 0.47 ‐0.32 0.30 0.98 ‐0.53 0.57 ‐0.55 0.82Bad CFD (s=0.125) 0.99 0.99 ‐0.09 0.48 ‐0.26 0.18 0.99 ‐0.24 0.40 ‐0.40 0.29Bad CFD (s=0.25) 0.97 0.94 ‐0.31 0.43 ‐0.56 0.33 0.97 ‐0.69 0.47 ‐0.56 0.32
T1 to MS2(LogI Error)
MS2 to T1(LogI Error)
Combined Fit (LogI Error)
Adenovirus Prediction(LogI Error)
T1 (R2)Combined Fit
(R2)MS2 (R2)
![Page 31: An Assessment of the Combined Variable Approach: 2 · –Use MS2 data to fit parameters in the CV equation to predict T1 within appropriate range (CV and ) –Use all data to fit](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050306/5f6ef19706b5f6683b2159a4/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Results: Bad CFD with Uncertainty
![Page 32: An Assessment of the Combined Variable Approach: 2 · –Use MS2 data to fit parameters in the CV equation to predict T1 within appropriate range (CV and ) –Use all data to fit](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050306/5f6ef19706b5f6683b2159a4/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Conclusions• CV approach appears viable if applied appropriately• Methodology work for all cases except where particle
trajectories varied with flow– This is outside the theoretical formulation assumptions– Extrapolation to a more resistant organism still worked
• Recommendations– Extrapolation on flow, CV and UVT should not be considered
– Effect of second order kinetics should be tested (tomorrow)