Download - Anpqp Version 2.2-Feb 2011
2
Index
New Revision Summary
New Revision Contents
2. Reinforced Requirements for “High Volume Parts”
3. Standardisation of Requirements Deployed since V2.1
4. Removal of Duplicated Requirements
5. Other Changes
1. Commonised Renault/Nissan Requirements
3
New Revision Summary
Main Request
� Collect all requirements deployed since V2.1 publication and incorporate into the new
revision.
Alliance
�Study and improve commonisation to support optimised joint procurement e.g.
Alliance “High Volume Parts”.
�Implement changes in global supplier training.
Nissan
�Incorporate new requirements for “Important C” to improve customer satisfaction.
�Incorporate reinforced requirements such as “Examples of Process/Facility Site
Changes” to clarify change management requirements and reduce concerns caused by
un-approved changes.
Renault
�Reduce the number of ANPQP requirements and focus on the product and process
conformity.
�Ensure consistency with the V3P milestones.
4
1. Commonised Renault/Nissan RequirementsCommonised “Process Potential FMEA”, “Supplier Digital Test Report” and
“Part Submission Warrant (PSW)”.
2. Reinforced Requirements for “High Volume Parts”Reinforced “Sub-Supplier Management” and reviewed “Change Management”
and “Identification and Traceability” to prevent an issue and/or contain it
immediately.
New Revision Summary
5
3. Standardisation of Requirements Deployed since V2.1Standardised Nissan unique requirements for “Important C” and reinforced
requirements for change management through addition of “Examples of
Process/ Facility Site Changes”.
Incorporated Renault/Nissan requirements for “Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)”.
4. Removal of Duplicated Requirements (Renault)Removed the Environmental outputs and the EDI requirements as they are
not specific to a part but to a plant location.
5. Other Changes
New Revision Summary
6
Index
New Revision Summary
New Revision Contents
2. Reinforced Requirements for “High Volume Parts”
3. Standardisation of Requirements Deployed since V2.1
4. Removal of Duplicated Requirements
5. Other Changes
1. Commonised Renault/Nissan Requirements
7
1) “Process Potential FMEA”(Activity 5.1)Merged the Renault “Process AMDEC” into the “Process Potential FMEA”.
2) “Supplier Digital Test Report” (Activity 6.1)Renault has commonised this requirement with Nissan to improve the
robustness of design and minimise the risk of having to introduce late
modifications.
3) “Part Submission Warrant (PSW)”(Activity 7.1)Merged the Renault “AFF” into the “Part Submission Warrant(PSW)” in
order to have a commonised PSW.
New Revision Contents1. Commonised Renault/Nissan Requirements
8
Index
New Revision Summary
New Revision Contents
2. Reinforced Requirements for “High Volume Parts”
3. Standardisation of Requirements Deployed since V2.1
4. Removal of Duplicated Requirements
5. Other Changes
1. Commonised Renault/Nissan Requirements
9
1) Reinforced Sub-Supplier Management�Reinforced the Tier 1 responsibilities and Part Submission Warrant (PSW)
approval timing for their bought out products.
�Reviewed the items covered in the CSCC*.
�Added the requirement for “Sub-Supplier PSW or equivalent”(Renault)
New Revision Contents2. Reinforced Requirements for “High Volume Parts”
Notes
�“The Tier 1 supplier shall a
system/procedure in place to select
new suppliers and to evaluate
current suppliers”.
Activity – Phase 4
�“Approve sub-supplier Part
Submission Warrant (PSW) or
equivalent”.
Activity 2.1
Note: Some details have been omitted for presentation purposes
Reviewed the items covered by the CSCC
and focus on features for “Supplier”,
“Manufacturing Process” and “Product”.
Format “CSCC”
Unique DCI
*) Component Supply Chain Chart
Added the requirement for “Sub-supplier
PSW or equivalent”.
10
2) Reinforced Change Management (Design Change)�Reviewed and commonised the definition.
New Revision Contents2. Reinforced Requirements for “High Volume Parts”
� Mechanism or structure
� Electrical function
� Material
� Dimensions or mass
� Other changes
(None)�Mechanism or structure
�Electrical function
�Material
(incl. supporting material such as grease,
paint, welding rod etc. )
�Dimensions or mass
�Sub-component layout
�Affecting homologation/safety/regulation
DCI
Activity 9.1
Note: Some details have been omitted for presentation purposes
11
3) Reinforced Change Management (Process Change)�Reviewed and reinforced the definition.
New Revision Contents2. Reinforced Requirements for “High Volume Parts”
Examples of changes:
�Facility site transfer/relocation
�Change to a Sub-supplier
�Change within a Sub-supplier
�Upgrade or rearrangement of
existing tooling or equipment
�Process related to a Special
Characteristic or Key Feature
�Process related to new
technology
�Control method used
�Process flow
Example of Changes that require Renault/
Nissan authorization include (but are not limited
to):
�All changes to or within a sub-supplier
�All Facility site transfers / relocations
�All changes affecting the process flow
�All changes relating to the addition,
modification or replacement of existing
equipment
�All changes relating to the manufacture or
inspection of Special Characteristics or Key
Features
�All changes relating to the manufacturing,
inspection or control method used
�All changes relating to logistics or packaging
Activity 9.2Activity 9.2
Note: Some details have been omitted for presentation purposes
12
4) Reviewed Identification/Traceability Requirements�Combined existing Lot Control and Parts Labeling activities.
�Developed a common activity description to clarify the Tier 1 responsibility.
New Revision Contents2. Reinforced Requirements for “High Volume Parts”
Activity Purpose:
Renault/Nissan requires its suppliers to operate an effective identification and
traceability system.
Notes:
�The Tier 1 supplier shall;
-manage traceability for all products & components.
-deploy the requirements to their sub-suppliers.
�Requirements may be specified on the drawings and/or data notes.
�No particular requirements are specified, the supplier must comply with the
requirements contained in the ISO/TS 16949 and within the relevant company
specific requirements section.
Activity 11.2
Note: Some details have been omitted for presentation purposes
13
Index
New Revision Summary
New Revision Contents
2. Reinforced Requirements for “High Volume Parts”
3. Standardisation of Requirements Deployed since V2.1
4. Removal of Duplicated Requirements
5. Other Changes
1. Commonised Renault/Nissan Requirements
14
1) Standardised Special Characteristics - “Important C”�Standardised previously deployed requirements to improve customer
satisfaction by reduction of variation.
�Reviewed “Important A” and “Important B” definitions.
New Revision Contents3. Standardisation of Requirements Deployed since V2.1
Nissan Specific Requirement - Activity. 4.5
Note: Some details have been omitted for presentation purposes
15
2) Standardized “Example of Process/Facility Change”�Incorporated a list of examples of changes requiring Nissan authorisation to
reduce concerns caused by poor change management.
New Revision Contents
3. Standardisation of Requirements Deployed since V2.1
Applies to all Tier 1 suppliers and all Sub suppliers to Tier N.
1st layer
2nd layer
3rd layer
Production site change
Relocation/Move to a different site
To another site owned by the parent company
To a different company ( out sourced)
Relocation/Move within the current site
Layout Change
Relocate production line (inc inspection process)
Machine/Equipment on the production line change (inc inspection machine)
Installing new equipment
Addition or replacement of machine/equipment
Example of "Process/Facility Site Change"
Remark
Object of Process Change
4M
Important Note:
Supplier shall review all changes by supplier internal cross functionally under Tier 1 responsibility.
Newly developed or Expansion to the current production line (inc inspection process)
Process sequence (inc adding or eliminating process steps)
Machine
Note: Some details have been omitted for presentation purposes
16
3) Standardised “Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)”�Identified the Renault/Nissan common minimum content requirements for
Fault Tree Analysis and standardised the requirement in a newly developed
Document Completion Instruction (DCI).
New Revision Contents
3. Standardisation of Requirements Deployed since V2.1
Note: Some details have been omitted for presentation purposes
17
Index
New Revision Summary
New Revision Contents
2. Reinforced Requirements for “High Volume Parts”
3. Standardisation of Requirements Deployed since V2.1
4. Removal of Duplicated Requirements
5. Other Changes
1. Commonised Renault/Nissan Requirements
18
1) Removal of the EDI requirements from ANPQP� Removal of the “Supplier EDI Agreement” and “EDI Submission Warrant”
outputs from the ANPQP standard because they are related to plant location
and not to part, therefore are outside the scope of the ANPQP file.
� These requirements are already included in the Renault Suppliers Logistics
Guidebook and are applicable.
2) Removal of the Environmental outputs from ANPQP� Removal of the “Substances & Recycled or Renewable Materials “, “TDR”
and “IMDS” outputs from the ANPQP standard because they are outside the
scope of the ANPQP file.
� These requirements are already included in the 00-10-415 standard and
are applicable.
New Revision Contents4. Removal of Duplicated Requirements
19
Index
New Revision Summary
New Revision Contents
2. Reinforced Requirements for “High Volume Parts”
3. Standardisation of Requirements Deployed since V2.1
4. Removal of Duplicated Requirements
5. Other Changes
1. Commonised Renault/Nissan Requirements
20
New Revision Contents5. Other Changes
Element Activity Renault Nissan *DCI Format Example L
1.1 Product & Process Concept
Study2
2
Renault (2)
Nissan 2
Documents Name
Product and Process Concept Proposal
Product Quality Targets Study Plan
1. CONTRACT REVIEW
1.2 Product Quality and Reliability
Management
Component Supply Chain Chart (CSCC)
2. SUB-SUPPLIER MANAGEMENT
Product Reliability Targets
Study Plan
1) Added a description for each Category to explain its purpose.
2) Moved one Activity - “1.2 Product Quality and Reliability Management” -
from Category 3 to Category 1
ANPQP Phase Diagram
Newly added Category description appears
when you click on each Category name.
Activity 1.2 moved from category 3
21
3) Changed the activity timings for “Supplier Master Schedule” and “Special
Characteristics and Key Features Diagram”.
4) Changed the document submission level for “Process Capability Study
Results” to reduce the supplier submission responsibilities.
Design Assurance Plan Nissan 3 2 2
Renault 1 1 1
Nissan 3 2 2
Quality Function
Deployment (QFD)Nissan (2) (2) (2)
HCPP Renault (2) 2 2
Supplier Feasibility
CommitmentRenault 2 2 2
Renault (2) (2) (2)
Nissan 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2
3 2 2
Renault (2) (2) 2 (2) (2) 2 (2)
Nissan 3 2 2 3 2 2
Process Capability Study
Results
3.2 Project Planning and Production
Preparation Monitoring
4.1 Identification and Deployment of
Special Characteristics and Key
Features
4. PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT Phase3
Supplier Master Schedule
(including Details)
Phase1 Phase2
Phase3 Phase4Phase2Phase1
Special Characteristics and
Key Feature Diagram
(SC & KFD)
5.4 Process Capability Study and
Improvement
Process Capability Study Plan
Phase4
3. PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Extended activity
Shortened activity
Changed submission level
New Revision Contents5. Other Changes
22
5) Updated the “Other Supply Requirement” and “Glossary” in the Alliance
Supplier Guide (A.S.G.)
Updated requirement Updated glossary
A.S.G
New Revision Contents5. Other Changes