![Page 1: Assessment of trustworthiness of online audited reflexivity](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568164c0550346895dd6d204/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
ASSESSMENT OF TRUSTWORTHINESS OF ONLINE AUDITED REFLEXIVITY
Frank LaBanca, EdDDirector
![Page 2: Assessment of trustworthiness of online audited reflexivity](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568164c0550346895dd6d204/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
21st-century Approach to Presentation
• Resources
![Page 3: Assessment of trustworthiness of online audited reflexivity](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568164c0550346895dd6d204/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Evolution of this research• What I’m not focusing on . . .
• Multicase study of the impact of problem finding on the quality of authentic open inquiry science research projects.
![Page 4: Assessment of trustworthiness of online audited reflexivity](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568164c0550346895dd6d204/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Evolution of this research• What I am focusing on . . .
• The impact of a novel reflexivity technique (reflective writing) on the emergent outcomes of the problem finding study.
![Page 5: Assessment of trustworthiness of online audited reflexivity](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568164c0550346895dd6d204/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
“Metareflexivity”
• My role• My auditor’s role
• Methods development
![Page 6: Assessment of trustworthiness of online audited reflexivity](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568164c0550346895dd6d204/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Characteristics of high quality reflexivity
• Critical self reflection• Ongoing record of experiences, reactions, and emerging
awareness of assumptions, biases, or positionality • Identifying, accepting, verifying, and/or unlearning of
preconceived personal and theoretical commitments • Emerging awareness of ideas• Build trustworthiness
![Page 7: Assessment of trustworthiness of online audited reflexivity](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568164c0550346895dd6d204/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
![Page 8: Assessment of trustworthiness of online audited reflexivity](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568164c0550346895dd6d204/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Data sample• Unit of study: “Post” – (my writing) 37 units
“Response” – (audits) 26 units
• Lines of text: 2625
Data analysis
Pilot study
Writing/Revising
Data collection
4/06-6/06
7/06-9/06
10/06-12/06
1/07-3/07
4/07-6/07
7/07-9/07
10/07-12/07
1/08-3/08
4/08-6/08
0
2
4
6
8
10Frequency of post entries (3-month intervals)
num
ber o
f pos
ts Study design
![Page 9: Assessment of trustworthiness of online audited reflexivity](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568164c0550346895dd6d204/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Emergent ThemesTheme Sample Code Code definition
Describing Tasks Define Defining something
Elaborate Providing context, elaboration of a statement, or an explanation
Task Explaining what I'm doing
Concept building Community Workings of the science research community of practice
Role Role of teachers, professionals, adults
Studbehav Student behaviors
Theory Linking behaviors to theory
Decision Points and Interaction
Consider Considering alternatives
Emerge What emerges from the data?
Solution A possible solution to a problem
Advice Taking advice from someone
Disagree Disagreeing with a colleague
Opinion Opinions of others that influence my thought
Metacognitive actions
Benefits The benefits to a decision
Influence How I am being influenced by my daily activities
Motivation What motivates me (or someone else)
![Page 10: Assessment of trustworthiness of online audited reflexivity](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568164c0550346895dd6d204/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Distribution of Themes
![Page 11: Assessment of trustworthiness of online audited reflexivity](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568164c0550346895dd6d204/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Findings• Describing Tasks– Explanations, often elaborated– Audit trail for dependability
• Concept Building– Subject behaviors to theory– Nature of socially constructing situated knowledge– Auditors: Learning theory and alternate learning
theory
![Page 12: Assessment of trustworthiness of online audited reflexivity](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568164c0550346895dd6d204/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Findings• Decision Points and Interaction– Considering alternatives– Evolution of ideas– Auditors: Agree and consider– Auditors: Influence on each other: elaboration
• Metacognitive actions– Influence of external factors: past, present, future– Looking for clarification: process and change– Auditors: Connecting with their own interests and
passions.
![Page 13: Assessment of trustworthiness of online audited reflexivity](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568164c0550346895dd6d204/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Benefits of a blog for reflexivity
Effective tool for qualitative research• Online, accessible, asynchronous• Ease of use• Convenience for auditors• Impact of auditors on each other for variety• Transparent
![Page 14: Assessment of trustworthiness of online audited reflexivity](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568164c0550346895dd6d204/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Limitations• Single case study• Bias towards technology• “Metareflexive”
![Page 15: Assessment of trustworthiness of online audited reflexivity](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568164c0550346895dd6d204/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Thank you
www.labanca.net
problemfinding.labanca.net