-
1
Niagara Region
Baker Rd. WWTP PPCP & MSP Update
October 22nd, 2019
2:00 – 4:00 pm
-
2
Presentation Overview
1. Welcome & Introduction
2. Project Overview
3. Project Objectives
4. Environmental Assessment
5. Next Steps
-
3
Welcome & Introduction
-
4
Region Point of Contact
• Ilija – project manager
• Gillian – assistant project manager
• Anastasia copied on all communications
GMBP Point of Contact:
• Julien – project manager
• Bryan – technical lead & assistant
• Yuraima – Project Coordinator (copied on
all communications)
• David - Advisor
TSC
• Bob (Grimsby)
• Steve (West Lincoln)
• Shawn (MECP)
-
5
Project Overview
-
6
Project Objectives
Pollution Prevention and
Control Plan
&
Master Plan
Quantify Levels of Service
Action Plan to Maintain and Improve Levels of Service
Reduce or Eliminate Environmental Impacts at CSO and SSO Locations
Facilitate Long Term Growth and Sustainability
Reduce Inflow and Infiltration into the Wastewater System
-
7
Key Project Components
Problem and Opportunity
Data Collection and Review
System Characterization
Level of Service
Growth
Alternatives Solutions
System Characterization
Alternative Development and Review
Capital Program Development
80 Y Program Development
Priority Areas
Communications
EA Communications Process
Project Management & Meetings
-
8
Understanding of Systems
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
Key Issues
-
14
Target Levels of Service
• Performance•F-5-5
•Facility Capacity
•Growth
•Basement Flooding
•I&I Reductions
• Condition and Maintenance
Main driver for upgrade needs
•Different system condition and performance
•Different project needs and outcomes
•Potential for municipality based LoS
•Target LoS will be a guideline for flexibility and resilience
3 Municipalities & Region
•Understand current system hydraulic performance, review areas of concern, set target levels of service
•Review existing system condition and determine maintenance, staffing and resourcing strategies to maintain or improve LoS
Approach
-
15
Growth Projections
• Timing,
• Scenarios,
• Resiliency of project recommendations
Availability and precision of growth will impact:
• Next meeting dedicated to review growth in detail
• Coordination and communication with Planning Staff
• Leverage MSP growth scenarios and complete sensitivity analysis of ranges and densities
• Develop capital plan project triggers in terms of development units instead of time/year
• Potential oversizing for resiliency and flexibility
Mitigation Strategy
-
16
Model
•Updated and Consolidated Model
•Support local and regional needs for PPCP
Hydraulic Model Needs
•3 models in different states
•Data availability and maturity to update and calibrate
•Flow monitoring
•Network
•Facilities
•Smithville Community Master Plan
Model Challenges
•Follow Region MSP Model build guidelines
•Dynamic Wet Weather flow Model
•Separate workshop to review approach (TM#3 & TM#5)
Approach
-
17
Pump Station Performance
-
18
Class Environmental Assessment
-
19
Key EA Communication Activities
Communication & Consultation Plan
• Stakeholder Contact List Development & Maintenance
• Stakeholder Meetings
• Internal Workshops
• Class EA communication requirements
• Website Updates
Public Notices
• Study Commencement
• PIC’s
• Study Completion
Public Information Centers
• PIC #1 – Problem & opportunities / background
• PIC #2 – Constraints, strategy options, evaluation, preliminary recommendations
Report & Documentation
-
20
PIC #1 Content & Timelines
• Project Overview & Objectives
• EA Process
• Project Schedule
• Baker Rd WWTP System Overview
• Key Objectives
• Problem & Opportunity Statement
• Key Areas of Concern
• Long List of Alternatives
• Thanks & Contact Info
Dec. 2019• Draft NOC
Jan. 2020
• Issue Notice of Commencement
Feb - March 2020
• Draft & Finalize PIC Boards
April 2020• PIC #1
-
21
Project Schedule
-
22
-
23
Confirm Deliverables
If Flow Monitoring included in scope:
• 2 months project delayed
• $ 4,910 / site additional cost
• Opportunities to leverage parallel
Regional Flow Monitoring Program
Benefits:
• Fill data gaps
• More representative baseline of existing
system performance
-
24
Next Steps
-
25
Request for Information
-
26
Request for Information
• Draw down testing
• Recommended at all stations
• Ilija to confirm which stations have been done in past two years and who will complete
work if required
• Combination of pumps to be considered to define operational vs install capacity
• Lincoln CCTV data to be provided end of 2019
• Different system have different GIS detail, will be identified in data gap analysis
-
27
Next Steps
• Continue Collect and review of Background Information
• TM#1 & TM#2
• Background tech memo to identify available information
• Recommendations for flow monitoring needs
• Prepare Project Communication Plan
Next Steps
-
28
Closing
Thank You
GM BluePlan Team
David Watt – [email protected]
Julien Bell – [email protected]
Bryan Bortolon – [email protected]
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
Structure BookmarksSectFigure111
Niagara RegionNiagara RegionNiagara RegionBaker Rd. WWTP PPCP & MSP Update
October 22October 22October 22nd, 2019
2:00 2:00 –4:00 pm
FigureFigureFigureFigure
SectArtifact222
Presentation OverviewPresentation OverviewPresentation Overview
1.1.1.1.1.Welcome & Introduction
2.2.2.Project Overview
3.3.3.Project Objectives
4.4.4.Environmental Assessment
5.5.5.5.Next Steps
Figure
SectFigure333
Welcome & IntroductionWelcome & IntroductionWelcome & Introduction
Figure
SectFigure444
Region Point of ContactRegion Point of ContactRegion Point of Contact
••••Ilija–project manager
•••Gillian –assistant project manager
•••Anastasia copied on all communications
GMBP Point of Contact:GMBP Point of Contact:
••••Julien –project manager
•••Bryan –technical lead & assistant
•••Yuraima –Project Coordinator (copied on all communications)
•••David -Advisor
TSCTSCTSC
••••Bob (Grimsby)
•••Steve (West Lincoln)
•••Shawn (MECP)
SectFigure555
Project OverviewProject OverviewProject Overview
Figure
SectFigure666
Project ObjectivesProject ObjectivesProject Objectives
FigureSpanPollution Pollution Prevention and Control Plan
& &
Master PlanMaster Plan
ArtifactFigureQuantify Levels of ServiceQuantify Levels of ServiceQuantify Levels of Service
Action Plan to Maintain and Improve Action Plan to Maintain and Improve Action Plan to Maintain and Improve Levels of Service
Reduce or Eliminate Environmental Impacts Reduce or Eliminate Environmental Impacts Reduce or Eliminate Environmental Impacts at CSO and SSO Locations
FigureFacilitate Long Term Growth and SustainabilityFacilitate Long Term Growth and SustainabilityFacilitate Long Term Growth and Sustainability
FigureFigureFigureFigureFigureReduce Inflow and Infiltration into the Reduce Inflow and Infiltration into the Reduce Inflow and Infiltration into the Wastewater System
Figure
SectFigure777
Key Project ComponentsKey Project ComponentsKey Project Components
DiagramFigureSpanProblem and Problem and Problem and Opportunity
FigureSpanData Collection and ReviewData Collection and ReviewData Collection and Review
FigureSpanSystem CharacterizationSystem CharacterizationSystem Characterization
FigureSpanLevel of ServiceLevel of ServiceLevel of Service
FigureSpanGrowthGrowthGrowth
FigureSpanAlternatives SolutionsAlternatives SolutionsAlternatives Solutions
FigureSpanSystem CharacterizationSystem CharacterizationSystem Characterization
FigureSpanAlternativeAlternativeAlternativeDevelopment and Review
FigureSpanCapital Program DevelopmentCapital Program DevelopmentCapital Program Development
FigureSpan80 Y Program Development80 Y Program Development80 Y Program Development
FigureSpanPriority AreasPriority AreasPriority Areas
FigureSpanCommunicationsCommunicationsCommunications
FigureSpanEA Communications EA Communications EA Communications Process
FigureSpanProject Management & Project Management & Project Management & Meetings
SectFigure888
Understanding of SystemsUnderstanding of SystemsUnderstanding of Systems
Figure
SectArtifact999
FigureFigure
SectArtifact101010
FigureFigure
SectArtifact111111
FigureFigure
SectArtifact121212
FigureFigure
SectFigure131313
Key IssuesKey IssuesKey Issues
Figure
SectFigure141414
Target Levels of ServiceTarget Levels of ServiceTarget Levels of Service
DiagramFigureSpanMain driver for upgrade needsMain driver for upgrade needs
FigureSpan•••••Performance
••••F-5-5
•••Facility Capacity
•••Growth
•••Basement Flooding
•••I&I Reductions
•••Condition and Maintenance
FigureSpan3 Municipalities & Region3 Municipalities & Region
FigureSpan•••••Different system condition and performance
•••Different project needs and outcomes
•••Potential for municipality based LoS
•••Target LoSwill be a guideline for flexibility and resilience
FigureSpanApproachApproach
FigureSpan•••••Understand current system hydraulic performance, review areas of concern, set target levels of service
•••Review existing system condition and determine maintenance, staffing and resourcing strategies to maintain or improve LoS
SectFigure151515
Growth ProjectionsGrowth ProjectionsGrowth Projections
DiagramFigureSpanAvailability and precision of growth will impact:Availability and precision of growth will impact:
FigureSpan•••••Timing,
•••Scenarios,
•••Resiliency of project recommendations
FigureSpanMitigation StrategyMitigation Strategy
FigureSpan•••••Next meeting dedicated to review growth in detail
•••Coordination and communication with Planning Staff
•••Leverage MSP growth scenarios and complete sensitivity analysis of ranges and densities
•••Develop capital plan project triggers in terms of development units instead of time/year
•••Potential oversizing for resiliency and flexibility
SectFigure161616
ModelModelModel
DiagramFigureSpanHydraulic Model NeedsHydraulic Model Needs
FigureSpan•••••Updated and Consolidated Model
•••Support local and regional needs for PPCP
FigureSpanModel ChallengesModel Challenges
FigureSpan•••••3 models in different states
•••Data availability and maturity to update and calibrate
••••Flow monitoring
•••Network
•••Facilities
•••Smithville Community Master Plan
FigureSpanApproachApproach
FigureSpan•••••Follow Region MSP Model build guidelines
•••Dynamic Wet Weather flow Model
•••Separate workshop to review approach (TM#3 & TM#5)
SectFigure171717
Pump Station PerformancePump Station PerformancePump Station Performance
FigureFigureFigure
SectFigure181818
Class Environmental AssessmentClass Environmental AssessmentClass Environmental Assessment
Figure
SectFigure191919
Key EA Communication ActivitiesKey EA Communication ActivitiesKey EA Communication Activities
Communication & Consultation PlanCommunication & Consultation PlanCommunication & Consultation Plan
••••Stakeholder Contact List Development & Maintenance
•••Stakeholder Meetings
•••Internal Workshops
•••Class EA communication requirements
•••Website Updates
Public NoticesPublic Notices
••••Study Commencement
•••PIC’s
•••Study Completion
Public Information CentersPublic Information Centers
••••PIC #1 –Problem & opportunities / background
•••PIC #2 –Constraints, strategy options, evaluation, preliminary recommendations
Report & Documentation Report & Documentation
SectFigure202020
PIC #1 Content & TimelinesPIC #1 Content & TimelinesPIC #1 Content & Timelines
•••••Project Overview & Objectives
•••EA Process
•••Project Schedule
•••Baker Rd WWTP System Overview
•••Key Objectives
•••Problem & Opportunity Statement
•••Key Areas of Concern
•••Long List of Alternatives
•••Thanks & Contact Info
DiagramArtifactSpanDec. 2019Dec. 2019
FigureSpan•••••Draft NOC
FigureSpanJan. 2020Jan. 2020
FigureSpan•••••Issue Notice of Commencement
FigureSpanFeb Feb -March 2020
FigureSpan•••••Draft & Finalize PIC Boards
FigureSpanApril 2020April 2020
FigureSpan•••••PIC #1
SectFigure212121
Project ScheduleProject ScheduleProject Schedule
Figure
SectArtifact222222
FigureFigureFigureFigure
SectFigure232323
Confirm DeliverablesConfirm DeliverablesConfirm Deliverables
FigureIf Flow Monitoring included in scope:If Flow Monitoring included in scope:If Flow Monitoring included in scope:
••••2 months project delayed
•••$ 4,910 / site additional cost
•••Opportunities to leverage parallel Regional Flow Monitoring Program
Benefits:Benefits:
••••Fill data gaps
•••More representative baseline of existing system performance
SectFigure242424
Next StepsNext StepsNext Steps
Figure
SectFigure252525
Request for InformationRequest for InformationRequest for Information
Figure
SectFigure262626
Request for InformationRequest for InformationRequest for Information
•••••Draw down testing
••••Recommended at all stations
•••Ilijato confirm which stations have been done in past two years and who will complete work if required
•••Combination of pumps to be considered to define operational vs install capacity
•••Lincoln CCTV data to be provided end of 2019
•••Different system have different GIS detail, will be identified in data gap analysis
SectFigure272727
Next StepsNext StepsNext Steps
•••••Continue Collect and review of Background Information
•••TM#1 & TM#2
••••Background tech memo to identify available information
•••Recommendations for flow monitoring needs
•••Prepare Project Communication Plan
Next StepsNext StepsNext Steps
Figure
SectFigure282828
ClosingClosingClosing
Thank YouThank YouThank You
GM BluePlan TeamGM BluePlan Team
David Watt David Watt –[email protected]@gmblueplan.caSpan
Julien Bell Julien Bell –[email protected]@gmblueplan.caSpan
Bryan Bortolon Bryan Bortolon –[email protected]@gmblueplan.caSpan