Download - Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results
![Page 1: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
February 8, 2016Bay Village City Council Presentation
Draft 2015 Survey ResultsCity of Bay Village
![Page 2: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
About County Planning
![Page 3: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
To inform and provide services in support of the short and long term comprehensive planning, quality of
life, environment, and economic development of Cuyahoga County
and its cities, villages and townships.“ ”
![Page 4: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Local Expertise + Regional View
![Page 5: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
CPC Board Members by Region (8):Westshore: Honorable Eileen Patton
Mayor, City of Fairview Park
Southwest: Honorable Cyril KleemMayor, City of Berea
South Central: Honorable Michael P. ByrneMayor, City of Parma Heights
Cuyahoga: Honorable Michael ProcukMayor, Village of Brooklyn Heights
Cleveland: Mr. Freddie Collier Representing Mayor Jackson
Chagrin/SE: Honorable Brad SellersMayor, City of Warrensville Heights
Hillcrest: Honorable Merle GordenMayor, City of Beachwood
Heights: Honorable Susan K. Infeld Mayor, City of University Heights
Cuyahoga County Representatives (3):
Mr. Nathan Kelly, ChairMs. Sunny Simon, Vice ChairMs. Shontel Brown
Board Structure & Representation
![Page 6: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
2015 Community Master Plans
Cleveland Heights, University Heights, Parma Heights, and
Olmsted Falls
Beachwood Survey and Community Master Plan
Master plan covering land use, transportation, and economic development
![Page 7: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Countywide Housing Study
Plan to determine housing needs, market demand, and
best practices
Place-Based Economic
Development PlanCountywide economic
development framework
![Page 8: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Parma Town Center Task
ForcePlan for building and
branding the city center of Parma
GreenPrintTool for identifying,
preserving, and expanding environmental features
![Page 9: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Eastside Greenway TLCI
Multi-modal transportation plan for eastside communities
![Page 10: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Draft 2015 Survey ResultsCity of Bay Village
February 8, 2016Bay Village City Council Presentation
![Page 11: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
• Methodology + Process• Results Report• Detailed Findings
![Page 12: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
• Methodology + Process• Results Report• Detailed Findings
![Page 13: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
• Methodology + Process• Results Report• Detailed Findings
![Page 14: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
• Methodology + Process• Results Report• Detailed Findings
![Page 15: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Methodology + Process
![Page 16: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Formulated
QuestionsMailed
SurveysFollow-Up Postcard
Tabulated Results
Produced Report
![Page 17: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Bay Village SurveyTotal Households 6,043 Households
![Page 18: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Bay Village SurveyTotal Households 6,043 HouseholdsMailed Surveys 1,200 Surveys
![Page 19: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Bay Village SurveyTotal Households 6,043 HouseholdsMailed Surveys 1,200 SurveysReturned Surveys 576 SurveysResponse Rate 48.0%
![Page 20: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Bay Village SurveyTotal Households 6,043 HouseholdsMailed Surveys 1,200 SurveysReturned Surveys 576 SurveysResponse Rate 48.0%Confidence Level 95%Statistical Error Rate +/- 3.88
![Page 21: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Results Report
![Page 22: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
• Executive Summary and Introduction
• Detailed Findings• Demographics• Appendix A: Numerical Results• Appendix B: Comments• Appendix C: Survey Instrument
![Page 23: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
• Executive Summary and Introduction
• Detailed Findings• Demographics• Appendix A: Numerical Results• Appendix B: Comments• Appendix C: Survey Instrument
![Page 24: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
• Executive Summary and Introduction
• Detailed Findings• Demographics• Appendix A: Numerical Results• Appendix B: Comments• Appendix C: Survey Instrument
![Page 25: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
• Executive Summary and Introduction
• Detailed Findings• Demographics• Appendix A: Numerical Results• Appendix B: Comments• Appendix C: Survey Instrument
![Page 26: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
• Executive Summary and Introduction
• Detailed Findings• Demographics• Appendix A: Numerical Results• Appendix B: Comments• Appendix C: Survey Instrument
![Page 27: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Detailed Findings
![Page 28: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
• City Qualities• Land Use• Community
Events• Parks and
Recreation
• Transportation• City Services• Housing• Important Issues• Quality of Life
![Page 29: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
City Qualities
![Page 30: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
City Qualities
Reasons for Residing in Bay VillageClose to Lake Erie
Feel safe in my neighborhood
Quality school system
My property is a good investment
For the suburban environment
Close to family/friends
Well-maintained neighborhood
Offers type of housing I want
Easy access to Downtown Cleveland
High quality municipal services
Access to highways
Easy access to city's parks
Close to work
Housing costs fit budget
Close to shopping0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
56.0%
55.3%
50.3%
38.0%
29.1%
25.4%
25.4%
21.5%
15.8%
15.6%
13.3%
11.0%
9.1%
8.4%
4.9%
![Page 31: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Close to Lake Erie
Feel safe in my neighborhood
Quality school system
My property is a good investment
For the suburban environment
Close to family/friends
Well-maintained neighborhood
Offers type of housing I want
Easy access to Downtown Cleveland
High quality municipal services
Access to highways
Easy access to city's parks
Close to work
Housing costs fit budget
Close to shopping0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
56.0%
55.3%
50.3%
38.0%
29.1%
25.4%
25.4%
21.5%
15.8%
15.6%
13.3%
11.0%
9.1%
8.4%
4.9%
City Qualities
Reasons for Residing in Bay Village
![Page 32: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Close to Lake Erie
Feel safe in my neighborhood
Quality school system
My property is a good investment
For the suburban environment
Close to family/friends
Well-maintained neighborhood
Offers type of housing I want
Easy access to Downtown Cleveland
High quality municipal services
Access to highways
Easy access to city's parks
Close to work
Housing costs fit budget
Close to shopping0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
56.0%
55.3%
50.3%
38.0%
29.1%
25.4%
25.4%
21.5%
15.8%
15.6%
13.3%
11.0%
9.1%
8.4%
4.9%
City Qualities
Reasons for Residing in Bay Village
![Page 33: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Close to Lake Erie
Feel safe in my neighborhood
Quality school system
My property is a good investment
For the suburban environment
Close to family/friends
Well-maintained neighborhood
Offers type of housing I want
Easy access to Downtown Cleveland
High quality municipal services
Access to highways
Easy access to city's parks
Close to work
Housing costs fit budget
Close to shopping0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
56.0%
55.3%
50.3%
38.0%
29.1%
25.4%
25.4%
21.5%
15.8%
15.6%
13.3%
11.0%
9.1%
8.4%
4.9%
City Qualities
Reasons for Residing in Bay Village
![Page 34: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
City Qualities
Considerations for Moving from Bay VillageI would not consider moving
For lower taxesFor a different climate
For a smaller houseFor a retirement friendly community
For attached condos/clustered homesFor more home for my money
For a newer houseTo be closer to family and/or friends
For a larger houseTo be closer to work/job relatedFor better community facilitiesFor a more rural environment
To be able to walk placesTo be closer to Downtown Cleveland
For a higher quality of municipal servicesFor a rental unit
For better access to shoppingFor less traffic congestion
For a better school districtFor a safer community
To have better access to highways0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
27.2%
49.9%
20.8%
15.1%
13.1%
12.6%
12.6%
11.2%
9.8%
8.3%
8.2%
8.2%
7.1%
6.7%
3.7%
3.4%
2.3%
1.8%
1.2%
0.9%
0.7%
0.2%
![Page 35: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
City Qualities
Considerations for Moving from Bay VillageI would not consider moving
For lower taxesFor a different climate
For a smaller houseFor a retirement friendly community
For attached condos/clustered homesFor more home for my money
For a newer houseTo be closer to family and/or friends
For a larger houseTo be closer to work/job relatedFor better community facilitiesFor a more rural environment
To be able to walk placesTo be closer to Downtown Cleveland
For a higher quality of municipal servicesFor a rental unit
For better access to shoppingFor less traffic congestion
For a better school districtFor a safer community
To have better access to highways0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
27.2%
49.9%
20.8%
15.1%
13.1%
12.6%
12.6%
11.2%
9.8%
8.3%
8.2%
8.2%
7.1%
6.7%
3.7%
3.4%
2.3%
1.8%
1.2%
0.9%
0.7%
0.2%
![Page 36: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
City Qualities
Considerations for Moving from Bay VillageI would not consider moving
For lower taxesFor a different climate
For a smaller houseFor a retirement friendly community
For attached condos/clustered homesFor more home for my money
For a newer houseTo be closer to family and/or friends
For a larger houseTo be closer to work/job relatedFor better community facilitiesFor a more rural environment
To be able to walk placesTo be closer to Downtown Cleveland
For a higher quality of municipal servicesFor a rental unit
For better access to shoppingFor less traffic congestion
For a better school districtFor a safer community
To have better access to highways0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
27.2%
49.9%
20.8%
15.1%
13.1%
12.6%
12.6%
11.2%
9.8%
8.3%
8.2%
8.2%
7.1%
6.7%
3.7%
3.4%
2.3%
1.8%
1.2%
0.9%
0.7%
0.2%
![Page 37: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
City Qualities
Considerations for Moving from Bay VillageI would not consider moving
For lower taxesFor a different climate
For a smaller houseFor a retirement friendly community
For attached condos/clustered homesFor more home for my money
For a newer houseTo be closer to family and/or friends
For a larger houseTo be closer to work/job relatedFor better community facilitiesFor a more rural environment
To be able to walk placesTo be closer to Downtown Cleveland
For a higher quality of municipal servicesFor a rental unit
For better access to shoppingFor less traffic congestion
For a better school districtFor a safer community
To have better access to highways0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
27.2%
49.9%
20.8%
15.1%
13.1%
12.6%
12.6%
11.2%
9.8%
8.3%
8.2%
8.2%
7.1%
6.7%
3.7%
3.4%
2.3%
1.8%
1.2%
0.9%
0.7%
0.2%
![Page 38: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
City Qualities
Considerations for Moving from Bay VillageI would not consider moving
For lower taxesFor a different climate
For a smaller houseFor a retirement friendly community
For attached condos/clustered homesFor more home for my money
For a newer houseTo be closer to family and/or friends
For a larger houseTo be closer to work/job relatedFor better community facilitiesFor a more rural environment
To be able to walk placesTo be closer to Downtown Cleveland
For a higher quality of municipal servicesFor a rental unit
For better access to shoppingFor less traffic congestion
For a better school districtFor a safer community
To have better access to highways0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
27.2%
49.9%
20.8%
15.1%
13.1%
12.6%
12.6%
11.2%
9.8%
8.3%
8.2%
8.2%
7.1%
6.7%
3.7%
3.4%
2.3%
1.8%
1.2%
0.9%
0.7%
0.2%
![Page 39: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
City Qualities
Considerations for Moving from Bay Village
18 to 44 Year Olds
• For lower taxes (48.4%)
• For a larger house (27.8%)
• For more home for my money (27.8%)
• To be closer to work/job related (18.3%)
• For a different climate (18.3%)
45 to 64 Year Olds
• For lower taxes (54.3%)
• For a different climate (26.7%)
• For a smaller house (14.3%)
• For attached condos/clustered homes (13.6%)
• For retirement friendly community (13.6%)
65+ Years Old
• For lower taxes (40.4%)
• For a smaller house (24.0%)
• For retirement friendly community (19.1%)
• For attached condos/clustered homes (16.9%)
• To be closer to family/friends (12.6%)
![Page 40: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
City Qualities
Considerations for Moving from Bay Village
18 to 44 Year Olds
• For lower taxes (48.4%)
• For a larger house (27.8%)
• For more home for my money (27.8%)
• To be closer to work/job related (18.3%)
• For a different climate (18.3%)
45 to 64 Year Olds
• For lower taxes (54.3%)
• For a different climate (26.7%)
• For a smaller house (14.3%)
• For attached condos/clustered homes (13.6%)
• For retirement friendly community (13.6%)
65+ Years Old
• For lower taxes (40.4%)
• For a smaller house (24.0%)
• For retirement friendly community (19.1%)
• For attached condos/clustered homes (16.9%)
• To be closer to family/friends (12.6%)
![Page 41: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
City Qualities
Considerations for Moving from Bay Village
18 to 44 Year Olds
• For lower taxes (48.4%)
• For a larger house (27.8%)
• For more home for my money (27.8%)
• To be closer to work/job related (18.3%)
• For a different climate (18.3%)
45 to 64 Year Olds
• For lower taxes (54.3%)
• For a different climate (26.7%)
• For a smaller house (14.3%)
• For attached condos/clustered homes (13.6%)
• For retirement friendly community (13.6%)
65+ Years Old
• For lower taxes (40.4%)
• For a smaller house (24.0%)
• For retirement friendly community (19.1%)
• For attached condos/clustered homes (16.9%)
• To be closer to family/friends (12.6%)
![Page 42: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Land Use
![Page 43: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Environmentally friendly development is im-portant
New homes should match existing design
Maintain and attract retail/service stores
Focus on mixed-use development
Allow more townhouses/condos
Major streets should have decorative elements
Promote economic development
Allow more multi-family residential
Grow its population
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
26.9%
25.3%
14.3%
9.0%
10.2%
10.1%
7.4%
49.9%
35.5%
37.2%
35.1%
33.2%
32.1%
30.6%
11.1%
17.8%
22.8%
24.0%
30.7%
19.7%
36.6%
31.5%
17.6%
29.3%
14.0%
18.8%
17.4%
23.2%
17.7%
22.7%
39.9%
48.6%
7.8%
13.6%
7.7%
27.6%
14.5%
Land Use
Agree Neither Disagree
Opinions on Land Use Statements
![Page 44: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Environmentally friendly development is im-portant
New homes should match existing design
Maintain and attract retail/service stores
Focus on mixed-use development
Allow more townhouses/condos
Major streets should have decorative elements
Promote economic development
Allow more multi-family residential
Grow its population
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
26.9%
25.3%
14.3%
9.0%
10.2%
10.1%
7.4%
49.9%
35.5%
37.2%
35.1%
33.2%
32.1%
30.6%
11.1%
17.8%
22.8%
24.0%
30.7%
19.7%
36.6%
31.5%
17.6%
29.3%
14.0%
18.8%
17.4%
23.2%
17.7%
22.7%
39.9%
48.6%
7.8%
13.6%
7.7%
27.6%
14.5%
Land Use
Agree Neither Disagree
Opinions on Land Use Statements
![Page 45: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Environmentally friendly development is im-portant
New homes should match existing design
Maintain and attract retail/service stores
Focus on mixed-use development
Allow more townhouses/condos
Major streets should have decorative elements
Promote economic development
Allow more multi-family residential
Grow its population
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
26.9%
25.3%
14.3%
9.0%
10.2%
10.1%
7.4%
49.9%
35.5%
37.2%
35.1%
33.2%
32.1%
30.6%
11.1%
17.8%
22.8%
24.0%
30.7%
19.7%
36.6%
31.5%
17.6%
29.3%
14.0%
18.8%
17.4%
23.2%
17.7%
22.7%
39.9%
48.6%
7.8%
13.6%
7.7%
27.6%
14.5%
Land Use
Agree Neither Disagree
Opinions on Land Use Statements
![Page 46: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Environmentally friendly development is im-portant
New homes should match existing design
Maintain and attract retail/service stores
Focus on mixed-use development
Allow more townhouses/condos
Major streets should have decorative elements
Promote economic development
Allow more multi-family residential
Grow its population
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
26.9%
25.3%
14.3%
9.0%
10.2%
10.1%
7.4%
49.9%
35.5%
37.2%
35.1%
33.2%
32.1%
30.6%
11.1%
17.8%
22.8%
24.0%
30.7%
19.7%
36.6%
31.5%
17.6%
29.3%
14.0%
18.8%
17.4%
23.2%
17.7%
22.7%
39.9%
48.6%
7.8%
13.6%
7.7%
27.6%
14.5%
Land Use
Agree Neither Disagree
Opinions on Land Use Statements
![Page 47: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Land Use
18 to 44 Years Old 45 to 64 Years Old 65 Years and Older
Opinions on Land Use Statements by Age
46.7%62.1%
69.3%55.3%
46.6%
27.1% 26.2%
47.5% 50.6%
New homes should match the scale and
design of existing homes
Major streets should have decorative
elements (e.g., gateway signs, lamp posts)
The City should allow more townhouses or condos in appropriate
locations
![Page 48: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Land Use
18 to 44 Years Old 45 to 64 Years Old 65 Years and Older
Opinions on Land Use Statements by Age
46.7%62.1%
69.3%55.3%
46.6%
27.1% 26.2%
47.5% 50.6%
New homes should match the scale and
design of existing homes
Major streets should have decorative
elements (e.g., gateway signs, lamp posts)
The City should allow more townhouses or condos in appropriate
locations
![Page 49: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Community Events
![Page 50: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Community Events
Good Average Poor
Lake Erie Nature & Science Center Night
BAYarts Art Festival
BAYarts Farm + Art Market
BAYarts Moondance
Bay Library Programs
Annual May in Bay 5K
Touch-a-Truck
Summer Fun Night
Bay Days
Bay Village Community Christmas
Cahoon in June
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
46.2%
34.8%
33.0%
38.7%
34.9%
30.4%
35.0%
25.6%
29.2%
27.0%
29.6%
49.4%
53.4%
49.5%
43.7%
46.6%
49.8%
45.1%
53.5%
48.8%
46.5%
42.7%
11.1%
13.8%
14.7%
15.8%
18.1%
16.4%
17.7%
18.5%
23.7%
23.3%
Opinions on Community Events
![Page 51: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Community Events
Opinions on Community Events
Event Percent with “No Opinion”
Touch-a-Truck 58.7%Annual May in Bay 5K 58.4%BAYarts Moondance 56.5%Bay Village Community Christmas 55.9%Summer Fun Night 53.4%Cahoon in June 53.3%BAYarts Farm + Art Market 32.0%Lake Erie Nature & Science Center Night
27.2%
BAYarts Art Festival 25.5%Bay Library Programs 18.8%Bay Days 10.3%
![Page 52: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Community Events
Opinions on Community Events
Event Percent with “No Opinion”
Touch-a-Truck 58.7%Annual May in Bay 5K 58.4%BAYarts Moondance 56.5%Bay Village Community Christmas 55.9%Summer Fun Night 53.4%Cahoon in June 53.3%BAYarts Farm + Art Market 32.0%Lake Erie Nature & Science Center Night
27.2%
BAYarts Art Festival 25.5%Bay Library Programs 18.8%Bay Days 10.3%
Gre
ater
tha
n 50
%Le
ss t
han
35%
![Page 53: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Yes43.2%
No 11.8%
Not Sure
45.0%
Community Events
Would you like to see additional events?
![Page 54: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Community Events
Would you like to see additional events?
18 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 65 to 74 75+
64.1%57.6%
52.5%
36.8% 38.6%
16.7%
![Page 55: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Community Events
Would you like to see additional events?
18 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 65 to 74 75+
64.1%57.6%
52.5%
36.8% 38.6%
16.7%
Greater than 50%
Less than 40%
![Page 56: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Parks and Recreation
![Page 57: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Parks and Recreation
Opinions on Parks and Recreation Facilities
Huntington Reservation (Cleveland Metroparks)
Bay Village Family Aquatic Center
Cahoon Memorial Park
Bradley Park
Skate and Bike Park
Biking and Hiking Trails
Dwyer Memorial Senior Center
Reese Park (Clague Road)
Columbia Park
Community House
Community Gym/Fitness Room
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
52.4%
39.6%
27.8%
21.8%
17.0%
20.3%
15.4%
13.7%
11.3%
8.2%
40.0%
47.0%
53.4%
57.5%
52.6%
48.6%
51.8%
49.3%
41.1%
37.0%
24.4%
9.4%
16.9%
19.0%
21.4%
22.6%
28.6%
34.1%
36.8%
42.0%
28.9%
6.9%
9.3%
12.5%
25.8% 15.3%
Good Average Poor
![Page 58: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Parks and Recreation
Opinions on Parks and Recreation Facilities
Huntington Reservation (Cleveland Metroparks)
Bay Village Family Aquatic Center
Cahoon Memorial Park
Bradley Park
Skate and Bike Park
Biking and Hiking Trails
Dwyer Memorial Senior Center
Reese Park (Clague Road)
Columbia Park
Community House
Community Gym/Fitness Room
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
52.4%
39.6%
27.8%
21.8%
17.0%
20.3%
15.4%
13.7%
11.3%
8.2%
40.0%
47.0%
53.4%
57.5%
52.6%
48.6%
51.8%
49.3%
41.1%
37.0%
24.4%
9.4%
16.9%
19.0%
21.4%
22.6%
28.6%
34.1%
36.8%
42.0%
28.9%
6.9%
9.3%
12.5%
25.8% 15.3%
Good Average Poor
![Page 59: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Parks and Recreation
Opinions on Parks and Recreation Facilities
Huntington Reservation (Cleveland Metroparks)
Bay Village Family Aquatic Center
Cahoon Memorial Park
Bradley Park
Skate and Bike Park
Biking and Hiking Trails
Dwyer Memorial Senior Center
Reese Park (Clague Road)
Columbia Park
Community House
Community Gym/Fitness Room
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
52.4%
39.6%
27.8%
21.8%
17.0%
20.3%
15.4%
13.7%
11.3%
8.2%
40.0%
47.0%
53.4%
57.5%
52.6%
48.6%
51.8%
49.3%
41.1%
37.0%
24.4%
9.4%
16.9%
19.0%
21.4%
22.6%
28.6%
34.1%
36.8%
42.0%
28.9%
6.9%
9.3%
12.5%
25.8% 15.3%
Good Average Poor
![Page 60: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Opinions on Parks and Recreation Facilities
Event Percent with “No Opinion”
Dwyer Memorial Senior Center 49.4%Community Gym/Fitness Room 47.8%Skate and Bike Park 41.8%Community House 38.2%Columbia Park 30.0%Reese Park (Clague Road) 27.0%Bay Village Family Aquatic Center 25.7%Bradley Park 17.9%Biking and Hiking Trails 15.1%Cahoon Memorial Park 7.5%Huntington Reservation (Cleveland Metroparks) 2.8%
Parks and Recreation
![Page 61: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Opinions on Parks and Recreation Facilities
Event Percent with “No Opinion”
Dwyer Memorial Senior Center 49.4%Community Gym/Fitness Room 47.8%Skate and Bike Park 41.8%Community House 38.2%Columbia Park 30.0%Reese Park (Clague Road) 27.0%Bay Village Family Aquatic Center 25.7%Bradley Park 17.9%Biking and Hiking Trails 15.1%Cahoon Memorial Park 7.5%Huntington Reservation (Cleveland Metroparks) 2.8%
Parks and Recreation
![Page 62: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Ease of Access to Lake Erie
Parks and Recreation
Excellent41.8%
Good41.6%
Average10.5%
Poor5.4%
Very Poor0.7%
![Page 63: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
Yes29.1%
No 25.1%
Not Sure
45.8%
Would you like to see a new green space constructed next to City Hall?
Parks and Recreation
![Page 64: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
Overall Quality of Parks and Recreation Facilities
Parks and Recreation
Excellent27.3%
Good57.7%
Average14.3%
Poor0.5%
Very Poor0.2%
![Page 65: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
Transportation
![Page 66: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
Transportation
Opinions on Ease of Getting Around
Car
Walking
Bike
Senior Transportation
Public Transit
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
72.3%
46.2%
42.3%
12.9%
26.5%
43.3%
44.5%
24.2%
16.5%
7.6%
6.7%
56.1%
32.9% 28.8% 17.1%
Agree Neither Disagree
![Page 67: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
Transportation
Opinions on Ease of Getting Around
Car
Walking
Bike
Senior Transportation
Public Transit
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
72.3%
46.2%
42.3%
12.9%
26.5%
43.3%
44.5%
24.2%
16.5%
7.6%
6.7%
56.1%
32.9% 28.8% 17.1%
Agree Neither Disagree
![Page 68: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
Transportation
Priority for Improvements to Getting Around
High Average Low
Bike
Walking
Senior Transportation
Public Transit
Car0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
20.7%
14.4%
13.5%
9.1%
9.1%
30.3%
26.1%
24.5%
18.2%
11.4%
23.7%
30.3%
32.5%
33.8%
26.6%
10.6%
11.6%
10.0%
17.2%
20.5%
14.7%
17.6%
19.5%
21.7%
32.5%
![Page 69: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
Transportation
Priority for Improvements to Getting Around
High Average Low
Bike
Walking
Senior Transportation
Public Transit
Car0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
20.7%
14.4%
13.5%
9.1%
9.1%
30.3%
26.1%
24.5%
18.2%
11.4%
23.7%
30.3%
32.5%
33.8%
26.6%
10.6%
11.6%
10.0%
17.2%
20.5%
14.7%
17.6%
19.5%
21.7%
32.5%
![Page 70: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
Transportation
Priority for Improvements to Getting Around
High Average Low
Bike
Walking
Senior Transportation
Public Transit
Car0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
20.7%
14.4%
13.5%
9.1%
9.1%
30.3%
26.1%
24.5%
18.2%
11.4%
23.7%
30.3%
32.5%
33.8%
26.6%
10.6%
11.6%
10.0%
17.2%
20.5%
14.7%
17.6%
19.5%
21.7%
32.5%
![Page 71: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
Condition of the City’s Sidewalks
Transportation
Excellent9.1%
Good45.0%
Aver-age
35.6%
Poor9.8%
Very Poor0.5%
![Page 72: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
City Services
![Page 73: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
City Services
Opinions on Quality of City ServicesFire protection/EMS
Police protectionPark maintenance
Trash removal & curbside recyclingCompost and brush recycling
Leaf collectionTraffic enforcement
Recreational programsSnow removal
Senior transportation servicesStreet maintenance/repair
Building departmentCity of Bay Village website
Tree lawn plantingProperty maintenance enforcement
Sidewalk correction programWater back up/sewer inspection
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
59.0%
53.2%
32.7%
36.9%
33.3%
35.1%
28.6%
20.8%
24.4%
16.7%
11.3%
11.9%
10.6%
12.6%
7.1%
8.3%
8.1%
37.8%
40.7%
56.6%
49.3%
49.5%
46.1%
48.1%
54.5%
47.8%
46.5%
42.7%
40.4%
40.0%
35.0%
37.9%
31.6%
24.0%
9.7%
11.5%
13.2%
14.2%
18.7%
21.7%
22.6%
25.4%
34.9%
37.9%
41.8%
33.2%
35.7%
38.6%
31.7%
9.6%
7.9%
6.3%
13.8%
14.0%
15.5%
20.1% 16.1%
Good Average Poor
![Page 74: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
City Services
Opinions on Quality of City ServicesFire protection/EMS
Police protectionPark maintenance
Trash removal & curbside recyclingCompost and brush recycling
Leaf collectionTraffic enforcement
Recreational programsSnow removal
Senior transportation servicesStreet maintenance/repair
Building departmentCity of Bay Village website
Tree lawn plantingProperty maintenance enforcement
Sidewalk correction programWater back up/sewer inspection
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
59.0%
53.2%
32.7%
36.9%
33.3%
35.1%
28.6%
20.8%
24.4%
16.7%
11.3%
11.9%
10.6%
12.6%
7.1%
8.3%
8.1%
37.8%
40.7%
56.6%
49.3%
49.5%
46.1%
48.1%
54.5%
47.8%
46.5%
42.7%
40.4%
40.0%
35.0%
37.9%
31.6%
24.0%
9.7%
11.5%
13.2%
14.2%
18.7%
21.7%
22.6%
25.4%
34.9%
37.9%
41.8%
33.2%
35.7%
38.6%
31.7%
9.6%
7.9%
6.3%
13.8%
14.0%
15.5%
20.1% 16.1%
Good Average Poor
![Page 75: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
City Services
Opinions on Quality of City ServicesFire protection/EMS
Police protectionPark maintenance
Trash removal & curbside recyclingCompost and brush recycling
Leaf collectionTraffic enforcement
Recreational programsSnow removal
Senior transportation servicesStreet maintenance/repair
Building departmentCity of Bay Village website
Tree lawn plantingProperty maintenance enforcement
Sidewalk correction programWater back up/sewer inspection
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
59.0%
53.2%
32.7%
36.9%
33.3%
35.1%
28.6%
20.8%
24.4%
16.7%
11.3%
11.9%
10.6%
12.6%
7.1%
8.3%
8.1%
37.8%
40.7%
56.6%
49.3%
49.5%
46.1%
48.1%
54.5%
47.8%
46.5%
42.7%
40.4%
40.0%
35.0%
37.9%
31.6%
24.0%
9.7%
11.5%
13.2%
14.2%
18.7%
21.7%
22.6%
25.4%
34.9%
37.9%
41.8%
33.2%
35.7%
38.6%
31.7%
9.6%
7.9%
6.3%
13.8%
14.0%
15.5%
20.1% 16.1%
Good Average Poor
![Page 76: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
City Services
Opinions on Quality of City ServicesFire protection/EMS
Police protectionPark maintenance
Trash removal & curbside recyclingCompost and brush recycling
Leaf collectionTraffic enforcement
Recreational programsSnow removal
Senior transportation servicesStreet maintenance/repair
Building departmentCity of Bay Village website
Tree lawn plantingProperty maintenance enforcement
Sidewalk correction programWater back up/sewer inspection
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
59.0%
53.2%
32.7%
36.9%
33.3%
35.1%
28.6%
20.8%
24.4%
16.7%
11.3%
11.9%
10.6%
12.6%
7.1%
8.3%
8.1%
37.8%
40.7%
56.6%
49.3%
49.5%
46.1%
48.1%
54.5%
47.8%
46.5%
42.7%
40.4%
40.0%
35.0%
37.9%
31.6%
24.0%
9.7%
11.5%
13.2%
14.2%
18.7%
21.7%
22.6%
25.4%
34.9%
37.9%
41.8%
33.2%
35.7%
38.6%
31.7%
9.6%
7.9%
6.3%
13.8%
14.0%
15.5%
20.1% 16.1%
Good Average Poor
![Page 77: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
City Services
Opinions on Quality of City ServicesFire protection/EMS
Police protectionPark maintenance
Trash removal & curbside recyclingCompost and brush recycling
Leaf collectionTraffic enforcement
Recreational programsSnow removal
Senior transportation servicesStreet maintenance/repair
Building departmentCity of Bay Village website
Tree lawn plantingProperty maintenance enforcement
Sidewalk correction programWater back up/sewer inspection
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
59.0%
53.2%
32.7%
36.9%
33.3%
35.1%
28.6%
20.8%
24.4%
16.7%
11.3%
11.9%
10.6%
12.6%
7.1%
8.3%
8.1%
37.8%
40.7%
56.6%
49.3%
49.5%
46.1%
48.1%
54.5%
47.8%
46.5%
42.7%
40.4%
40.0%
35.0%
37.9%
31.6%
24.0%
9.7%
11.5%
13.2%
14.2%
18.7%
21.7%
22.6%
25.4%
34.9%
37.9%
41.8%
33.2%
35.7%
38.6%
31.7%
9.6%
7.9%
6.3%
13.8%
14.0%
15.5%
20.1% 16.1%
Good Average Poor
![Page 78: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
City Services
Opinions on Importance of City Services
Very Important Important Somewhat Important Not Important
Fire protection/EMSPolice protection
Trash removal & curbside recyclingSnow removal
Street maintenance/repairLeaf collection
Park maintenanceWater back up/sewer inspection
Compost and brush recyclingRecreational programs
Building departmentSidewalk correction program
Property maintenance enforcementTraffic enforcement
Senior transportation servicesTree lawn planting
City of Bay Village website0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
92.0%
89.6%
64.8%
75.5%
60.6%
65.7%
52.3%
66.8%
47.5%
37.8%
27.4%
28.5%
35.2%
34.0%
26.5%
19.2%
11.6%
7.5%
9.4%
33.4%
22.6%
37.5%
31.3%
44.5%
29.9%
43.6%
50.1%
54.6%
51.9%
44.9%
44.4%
45.7%
33.3%
38.1%
8.4%
10.0%
15.7%
17.9%
17.5%
19.0%
19.5%
34.7%
36.0%
8.3%
12.8%
14.3%
![Page 79: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
City Services
Opinions on Importance of City Services
Very Important Important Somewhat Important Not Important
Fire protection/EMSPolice protection
Trash removal & curbside recyclingSnow removal
Street maintenance/repairLeaf collection
Park maintenanceWater back up/sewer inspection
Compost and brush recyclingRecreational programs
Building departmentSidewalk correction program
Property maintenance enforcementTraffic enforcement
Senior transportation servicesTree lawn planting
City of Bay Village website0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
92.0%
89.6%
64.8%
75.5%
60.6%
65.7%
52.3%
66.8%
47.5%
37.8%
27.4%
28.5%
35.2%
34.0%
26.5%
19.2%
11.6%
7.5%
9.4%
33.4%
22.6%
37.5%
31.3%
44.5%
29.9%
43.6%
50.1%
54.6%
51.9%
44.9%
44.4%
45.7%
33.3%
38.1%
8.4%
10.0%
15.7%
17.9%
17.5%
19.0%
19.5%
34.7%
36.0%
8.3%
12.8%
14.3%
![Page 80: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
City Services
Opinions on Importance of City Services
Very Important Important Somewhat Important Not Important
Fire protection/EMSPolice protection
Trash removal & curbside recyclingSnow removal
Street maintenance/repairLeaf collection
Park maintenanceWater back up/sewer inspection
Compost and brush recyclingRecreational programs
Building departmentSidewalk correction program
Property maintenance enforcementTraffic enforcement
Senior transportation servicesTree lawn planting
City of Bay Village website0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
92.0%
89.6%
64.8%
75.5%
60.6%
65.7%
52.3%
66.8%
47.5%
37.8%
27.4%
28.5%
35.2%
34.0%
26.5%
19.2%
11.6%
7.5%
9.4%
33.4%
22.6%
37.5%
31.3%
44.5%
29.9%
43.6%
50.1%
54.6%
51.9%
44.9%
44.4%
45.7%
33.3%
38.1%
8.4%
10.0%
15.7%
17.9%
17.5%
19.0%
19.5%
34.7%
36.0%
8.3%
12.8%
14.3%
![Page 81: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
City Services
Matrix on Importance and Quality
![Page 82: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/82.jpg)
City Services
Matrix on Importance and QualityIn
crea
sing
qua
lity
Increasing importance
![Page 83: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/83.jpg)
City Services
Matrix on Importance and Quality
Average quality
![Page 84: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/84.jpg)
City Services
Matrix on Importance and Quality
Aver
age
impo
rtan
ce
![Page 85: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/85.jpg)
City Services
Matrix on Importance and QualityAbove average quality, above
average importance
![Page 86: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/86.jpg)
City Services
Matrix on Importance and Quality
Below average quality, above
average importance
![Page 87: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/87.jpg)
City Services
Matrix on Importance and Quality
Below average quality, below
average importance
![Page 88: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/88.jpg)
City Services
Matrix on Importance and Quality
Above average quality, below
average importance
![Page 89: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/89.jpg)
Overall Quality of City Services
Excellent33.3%
Good57.9%
Average7.9%
Poor0.7%
Very Poor0.2%
City Services
![Page 90: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/90.jpg)
Change in Overall Quality of City Services
Greatly Improved3.5%
Some-what Im-
proved33.0%
Stayed the Same
51.8%
Some-what
Declined10.7%
Greatly Declined0.9%
City Services
![Page 91: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/91.jpg)
Housing
![Page 92: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/92.jpg)
Housing
Priority for Types of Housing
High Average Low
Maintain existing housing
More options for seniors
More single-family detached
More walkable options
More townhouses/condos
More options for young people
More infill development
More apartments/mixed-use
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
55.4%
19.9%
14.5%
9.1%
10.9%
8.7%
32.6%
28.2%
31.4%
24.4%
20.9%
21.1%
17.5%
8.8%
10.3%
35.7%
35.2%
40.5%
27.4%
41.7%
37.1%
24.5%
8.7%
12.3%
18.0%
20.1%
20.2%
20.3%
25.6%
7.6%
6.6%
8.0%
20.7%
11.2%
16.3%
36.0%
![Page 93: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/93.jpg)
Maintain existing housing
More options for seniors
More single-family detached
More walkable options
More townhouses/condos
More options for young people
More infill development
More apartments/mixed-use
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
55.4%
19.9%
14.5%
9.1%
10.9%
8.7%
32.6%
28.2%
31.4%
24.4%
20.9%
21.1%
17.5%
8.8%
10.3%
35.7%
35.2%
40.5%
27.4%
41.7%
37.1%
24.5%
8.7%
12.3%
18.0%
20.1%
20.2%
20.3%
25.6%
7.6%
6.6%
8.0%
20.7%
11.2%
16.3%
36.0%
Housing
Priority for Types of Housing
High Average Low
![Page 94: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/94.jpg)
Maintain existing housing
More options for seniors
More single-family detached
More walkable options
More townhouses/condos
More options for young people
More infill development
More apartments/mixed-use
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
55.4%
19.9%
14.5%
9.1%
10.9%
8.7%
32.6%
28.2%
31.4%
24.4%
20.9%
21.1%
17.5%
8.8%
10.3%
35.7%
35.2%
40.5%
27.4%
41.7%
37.1%
24.5%
8.7%
12.3%
18.0%
20.1%
20.2%
20.3%
25.6%
7.6%
6.6%
8.0%
20.7%
11.2%
16.3%
36.0%
Housing
Priority for Types of Housing
High Average Low
![Page 95: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/95.jpg)
Maintain existing housing
More options for seniors
More single-family detached
More walkable options
More townhouses/condos
More options for young people
More infill development
More apartments/mixed-use
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
55.4%
19.9%
14.5%
9.1%
10.9%
8.7%
32.6%
28.2%
31.4%
24.4%
20.9%
21.1%
17.5%
8.8%
10.3%
35.7%
35.2%
40.5%
27.4%
41.7%
37.1%
24.5%
8.7%
12.3%
18.0%
20.1%
20.2%
20.3%
25.6%
7.6%
6.6%
8.0%
20.7%
11.2%
16.3%
36.0%
Housing
Priority for Types of Housing
High Average Low
![Page 96: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/96.jpg)
Maintain existing housing
More options for seniors
More single-family detached
More walkable options
More townhouses/condos
More options for young people
More infill development
More apartments/mixed-use
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
55.4%
19.9%
14.5%
9.1%
10.9%
8.7%
32.6%
28.2%
31.4%
24.4%
20.9%
21.1%
17.5%
8.8%
10.3%
35.7%
35.2%
40.5%
27.4%
41.7%
37.1%
24.5%
8.7%
12.3%
18.0%
20.1%
20.2%
20.3%
25.6%
7.6%
6.6%
8.0%
20.7%
11.2%
16.3%
36.0%
Housing
Priority for Types of Housing
High Average Low
![Page 97: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/97.jpg)
18 to 44 Years Old 45 to 64 Years Old 65 Years and Older
More housing options for seniors looking to
remain in the City
More well-designed single-family, detached
homes
Housing
Priority for Types of Housing
19.5%
46.2%
70.6%58.5%
45.2%38.0%
![Page 98: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/98.jpg)
18 to 44 Years Old 45 to 64 Years Old 65 Years and Older
More housing options for seniors looking to
remain in the City
More well-designed single-family, detached
homes
Housing
Priority for Types of Housing
19.5%
46.2%
70.6%58.5%
45.2%38.0%
![Page 99: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/99.jpg)
18 to 44 Years Old 45 to 64 Years Old 65 Years and Older
More housing options within walking distance
to amenities
More well-designed townhouses/condos
Housing
Priority for Types of Housing
25.6%34.4% 37.4%
16.3%
35.3% 38.4%6.5%
15.3% 17.3%
More well-designed apartments/mixed-use
development
![Page 100: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/100.jpg)
18 to 44 Years Old 45 to 64 Years Old 65 Years and Older
More housing options within walking distance
to amenities
More well-designed townhouses/condos
Housing
Priority for Types of Housing
25.6%34.4% 37.4%
16.3%
35.3% 38.4%6.5%
15.3% 17.3%
More well-designed apartments/mixed-use
development
![Page 101: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/101.jpg)
Since residing in Bay Village, has your basement flooded?
Yes46.1%
No 41.2%
No Basement12.3%
Not Sure0.5%
Housing
![Page 102: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/102.jpg)
If so, how many times has it flooded?
Housing
Once a month2.8%
Once every six (6) months
5.7%
Once a year9.5%
Once every few
years36.0%
Rarely45.9%
![Page 103: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/103.jpg)
Important Issues
![Page 104: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/104.jpg)
Ensuring public safety
Preserving open space/green space
Improving roads
Improving sidewalks
Providing recreational programs
Providing housing/services for seniors
Improving traffic flow
Having a diverse community
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
82.0%
52.3%
50.2%
51.0%
33.0%
39.0%
30.1%
39.9%
27.6%
28.5%
18.0%
15.0%
12.7%
11.7%
14.1%
11.5%
16.4%
37.2%
38.1%
33.1%
50.4%
41.7%
47.1%
36.9%
44.2%
41.0%
36.4%
32.7%
31.5%
29.1%
26.5%
27.1%
9.4%
9.1%
13.1%
15.4%
16.2%
20.9%
16.3%
23.9%
26.0%
35.1%
31.6%
39.9%
38.4%
34.3%
30.3%
6.9%
10.5%
20.7%
15.9%
20.8%
25.0%
31.2%
Important Issues
Opinions on Importance of Issues
Very Important Important Somewhat Important Not Important
![Page 105: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/105.jpg)
Ensuring public safety
Preserving open space/green space
Improving roads
Improving sidewalks
Providing recreational programs
Providing housing/services for seniors
Improving traffic flow
Having a diverse community
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
82.0%
52.3%
50.2%
51.0%
33.0%
39.0%
30.1%
39.9%
27.6%
28.5%
18.0%
15.0%
12.7%
11.7%
14.1%
11.5%
16.4%
37.2%
38.1%
33.1%
50.4%
41.7%
47.1%
36.9%
44.2%
41.0%
36.4%
32.7%
31.5%
29.1%
26.5%
27.1%
9.4%
9.1%
13.1%
15.4%
16.2%
20.9%
16.3%
23.9%
26.0%
35.1%
31.6%
39.9%
38.4%
34.3%
30.3%
6.9%
10.5%
20.7%
15.9%
20.8%
25.0%
31.2%
Important Issues
Opinions on Importance of Issues
Very Important Important Somewhat Important Not Important
![Page 106: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/106.jpg)
Ensuring public safety
Preserving open space/green space
Improving roads
Improving sidewalks
Providing recreational programs
Providing housing/services for seniors
Improving traffic flow
Having a diverse community
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
82.0%
52.3%
50.2%
51.0%
33.0%
39.0%
30.1%
39.9%
27.6%
28.5%
18.0%
15.0%
12.7%
11.7%
14.1%
11.5%
16.4%
37.2%
38.1%
33.1%
50.4%
41.7%
47.1%
36.9%
44.2%
41.0%
36.4%
32.7%
31.5%
29.1%
26.5%
27.1%
9.4%
9.1%
13.1%
15.4%
16.2%
20.9%
16.3%
23.9%
26.0%
35.1%
31.6%
39.9%
38.4%
34.3%
30.3%
6.9%
10.5%
20.7%
15.9%
20.8%
25.0%
31.2%
Important Issues
Opinions on Importance of Issues
Very Important Important Somewhat Important Not Important
![Page 107: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/107.jpg)
Ensuring public safety
Preserving open space/green space
Improving roads
Improving sidewalks
Providing recreational programs
Providing housing/services for seniors
Improving traffic flow
Having a diverse community
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
82.0%
52.3%
50.2%
51.0%
33.0%
39.0%
30.1%
39.9%
27.6%
28.5%
18.0%
15.0%
12.7%
11.7%
14.1%
11.5%
16.4%
37.2%
38.1%
33.1%
50.4%
41.7%
47.1%
36.9%
44.2%
41.0%
36.4%
32.7%
31.5%
29.1%
26.5%
27.1%
9.4%
9.1%
13.1%
15.4%
16.2%
20.9%
16.3%
23.9%
26.0%
35.1%
31.6%
39.9%
38.4%
34.3%
30.3%
6.9%
10.5%
20.7%
15.9%
20.8%
25.0%
31.2%
Important Issues
Opinions on Importance of Issues
Very Important Important Somewhat Important Not Important
![Page 108: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/108.jpg)
Ensuring public safety
Preserving open space/green space
Improving roads
Improving sidewalks
Providing recreational programs
Providing housing/services for seniors
Improving traffic flow
Having a diverse community
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
82.0%
52.3%
50.2%
51.0%
33.0%
39.0%
30.1%
39.9%
27.6%
28.5%
18.0%
15.0%
12.7%
11.7%
14.1%
11.5%
16.4%
37.2%
38.1%
33.1%
50.4%
41.7%
47.1%
36.9%
44.2%
41.0%
36.4%
32.7%
31.5%
29.1%
26.5%
27.1%
9.4%
9.1%
13.1%
15.4%
16.2%
20.9%
16.3%
23.9%
26.0%
35.1%
31.6%
39.9%
38.4%
34.3%
30.3%
6.9%
10.5%
20.7%
15.9%
20.8%
25.0%
31.2%
Important Issues
Opinions on Importance of Issues
Very Important Important Somewhat Important Not Important
![Page 109: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/109.jpg)
Ensuring public safety
Preserving open space/green space
Providing recreational programs
Being able to safely bike to amenities
Improving traffic flow
Providing housing/services for seniors
Improving the sewer systems
Attracting new retail/services
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
46.4%
15.4%
18.1%
19.7%
18.1%
7.2%
9.6%
6.2%
44.6%
52.3%
48.8%
45.7%
44.0%
45.0%
38.2%
34.5%
31.5%
30.5%
21.8%
18.2%
17.6%
15.4%
13.3%
10.1%
8.6%
29.4%
28.5%
30.8%
33.8%
39.8%
41.8%
46.5%
58.1%
48.3%
56.7%
56.1%
42.1%
65.6%
61.3%
65.9%
6.6%
8.4%
9.2%
13.2%
16.5%
15.2%
21.1%
14.2%
20.7%
19.6%
15.7%
Important Issues
Opinions on Current Effectiveness
Good Average Poor
![Page 110: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/110.jpg)
Ensuring public safety
Preserving open space/green space
Providing recreational programs
Being able to safely bike to amenities
Improving traffic flow
Providing housing/services for seniors
Improving the sewer systems
Attracting new retail/services
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
46.4%
15.4%
18.1%
19.7%
18.1%
7.2%
9.6%
6.2%
44.6%
52.3%
48.8%
45.7%
44.0%
45.0%
38.2%
34.5%
31.5%
30.5%
21.8%
18.2%
17.6%
15.4%
13.3%
10.1%
8.6%
29.4%
28.5%
30.8%
33.8%
39.8%
41.8%
46.5%
58.1%
48.3%
56.7%
56.1%
42.1%
65.6%
61.3%
65.9%
6.6%
8.4%
9.2%
13.2%
16.5%
15.2%
21.1%
14.2%
20.7%
19.6%
15.7%
Important Issues
Opinions on Current Effectiveness
Good Average Poor
![Page 111: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/111.jpg)
Ensuring public safety
Preserving open space/green space
Providing recreational programs
Being able to safely bike to amenities
Improving traffic flow
Providing housing/services for seniors
Improving the sewer systems
Attracting new retail/services
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
46.4%
15.4%
18.1%
19.7%
18.1%
7.2%
9.6%
6.2%
44.6%
52.3%
48.8%
45.7%
44.0%
45.0%
38.2%
34.5%
31.5%
30.5%
21.8%
18.2%
17.6%
15.4%
13.3%
10.1%
8.6%
29.4%
28.5%
30.8%
33.8%
39.8%
41.8%
46.5%
58.1%
48.3%
56.7%
56.1%
42.1%
65.6%
61.3%
65.9%
6.6%
8.4%
9.2%
13.2%
16.5%
15.2%
21.1%
14.2%
20.7%
19.6%
15.7%
Important Issues
Opinions on Current Effectiveness
Good Average Poor
![Page 112: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/112.jpg)
Ensuring public safety
Preserving open space/green space
Providing recreational programs
Being able to safely bike to amenities
Improving traffic flow
Providing housing/services for seniors
Improving the sewer systems
Attracting new retail/services
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
46.4%
15.4%
18.1%
19.7%
18.1%
7.2%
9.6%
6.2%
44.6%
52.3%
48.8%
45.7%
44.0%
45.0%
38.2%
34.5%
31.5%
30.5%
21.8%
18.2%
17.6%
15.4%
13.3%
10.1%
8.6%
29.4%
28.5%
30.8%
33.8%
39.8%
41.8%
46.5%
58.1%
48.3%
56.7%
56.1%
42.1%
65.6%
61.3%
65.9%
6.6%
8.4%
9.2%
13.2%
16.5%
15.2%
21.1%
14.2%
20.7%
19.6%
15.7%
Important Issues
Opinions on Current Effectiveness
Good Average Poor
![Page 113: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/113.jpg)
Important Issues
Matrix of Effectiveness and Importance
![Page 114: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/114.jpg)
Average effectiveness
Important Issues
Matrix of Effectiveness and ImportanceIn
crea
sing
eff
ecti
vene
ss
Increasing importance
Aver
age
impo
rtan
ce
![Page 115: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/115.jpg)
Important Issues
Matrix of Effectiveness and ImportanceAbove average effectiveness,
above average importance
![Page 116: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/116.jpg)
Important Issues
Matrix of Effectiveness and Importance
Below average effectiveness,
above average importance
![Page 117: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/117.jpg)
Important Issues
Matrix of Effectiveness and Importance
Below average effectiveness, below average
importance
![Page 118: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/118.jpg)
Important Issues
Matrix of Effectiveness and Importance
Above average effectiveness, below average
importance
![Page 119: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/119.jpg)
Quality of Life
![Page 120: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/120.jpg)
Quality of Life
Overall Quality of Life
Excel-lent
50.8%Good45.5%
Average3.5%
Poor0.2%
![Page 121: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/121.jpg)
Comments
![Page 122: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/122.jpg)
Quality of Life
Most Frequent Comments
• Parks and Recreation Facilities– Variety of park changes– Concerns about Cahoon Park
• Flooding and Sewer System– Roadway and basement flooding
• Animal Control– Deer population– Animal control officer
![Page 123: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/123.jpg)
Quality of Life
Most Frequent Comments
• Housing– Fix housing that is deteriorating– Issues concerning infill housing
• Transportation– New crosswalks– Safer paths to school– Removal of snow
![Page 124: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/124.jpg)
Demographics
![Page 125: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/125.jpg)
Demographics
Age of Respondents
18 to 34
35 to 44
45 to 54
55 to 64
65 to 74
75+ years
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
7.1%
15.2%
21.5%
24.0%
19.6%
12.7%
2015 Survey2014 American Community Survey
![Page 126: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/126.jpg)
Demographics
Age of Respondents
18 to 34
35 to 44
45 to 54
55 to 64
65 to 74
75+ years
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
7.1%
15.2%
21.5%
24.0%
19.6%
12.7%
10.4%
16.0%
24.7%
22.5%
15.3%
11.2%
2015 Survey2014 American Community Survey
![Page 127: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/127.jpg)
Demographics
Length of Residency
Under 2 years
2-5 years
6-10 years
11-20 years
21-30 years
More than 30 years
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%
4.9%
9.5%
11.2%
20.9%
21.1%
32.3%
![Page 128: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/128.jpg)
Demographics
Planned Length of Residency
Under 2 years
2-5 years
6-10 years
11-20 years
21-30 years
More than 30 years
I do not intend to move out of
Bay Village0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%
6.0%
11.6%
15.2%
16.3%
4.9%
1.8%
44.2%
![Page 129: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/129.jpg)
Demographics
Tenure of Respondents
Homeowner97.4%
Renter2.6%
![Page 130: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/130.jpg)
Demographics
Planned Tenure of Respondents
Owning94.6%
Renting5.4%
![Page 131: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/131.jpg)
Demographics
Ages of Respondent Household Members
2015 Survey2014 American Community Survey
0 to 17
18 to 24
25 to 34
35 to 44
45 to 54
55 to 64
65 to 74
75+ years
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
24.1%
8.3%
6.7%
9.6%
15.4%
15.9%
13.1%
6.9%
![Page 132: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/132.jpg)
Demographics
Ages of Respondent Household Members
2015 Survey2014 American Community Survey
0 to 17
18 to 24
25 to 34
35 to 44
45 to 54
55 to 64
65 to 74
75+ years
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
24.1%
8.3%
6.7%
9.6%
15.4%
15.9%
13.1%
6.9%
24.4%
4.8%
8.6%
12.7%
16.5%
15.7%
9.7%
7.6%
![Page 133: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/133.jpg)
Major Themes
![Page 134: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/134.jpg)
• Proximity to Lake Erie, safety, and schools are the top reasons people choose to live in Bay Village
![Page 135: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/135.jpg)
• Regardless of age, the prime reason residents would consider moving is for a community with lower taxes
• Young people are more likely to move for a larger house, while seniors are more likely to move for a smaller house
![Page 136: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/136.jpg)
• More than half of respondents want the City to focus on environmentally friendly development, want new homes to match existing design, and want to maintain and attract retail and service stores
![Page 137: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/137.jpg)
• More than half of respondents do not want more multi-family residential
• Growing the City’s population is not important to respondents
![Page 138: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/138.jpg)
• Younger respondents and households with younger respondents want more community events
![Page 139: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/139.jpg)
• The City’s parks are rated very highly
• There is potential to improve the Community House and Fitness Room
![Page 140: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/140.jpg)
• Respondents would like to see improvements to the City’s sidewalks and bikeways
![Page 141: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/141.jpg)
• Improvements to street maintenance and water back up/sewer inspection are key areas of importance
![Page 142: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/142.jpg)
• Overall, respondents rate the City’s services very highly
![Page 143: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/143.jpg)
• Overwhelmingly, respondents want to maintain existing housing and neighborhoods
![Page 144: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/144.jpg)
• The City’s seniors would like more housing options—and want a range of townhouses, mixed-use buildings, single-family homes, and walkable neighborhoods
![Page 145: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/145.jpg)
• Improving the sewer system, enforcing home maintenance ordinances, and improving sidewalks are key areas for respondents
![Page 146: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/146.jpg)
• Quality of life in Bay Village is rated very highly across the board
![Page 147: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/147.jpg)
• Methodology + Process• Results Report• Detailed Findings
![Page 148: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/148.jpg)
Thank you!Questions?
![Page 149: Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/58838f301a28ab07628b7085/html5/thumbnails/149.jpg)