1
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Achinstein, B., Ogawa, R. T., & Speiglman, A. (2004). Are we creating separate
and unequal tracks of teachers? The effects of state policy, local
conditions, and teacher characteristics on new teacher socialization.
American Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 557-603.
Adler, M. (1982). The Paideia Proposal: An Educational Manifesto. New York:
Touchstone.
Aiken, W. M. (1942). Adventure in American Education Volume I: The Story of
the Eight Year Study, With Conclusions and Recommendations,
Available from http://www.8yearstudy.org/
Anderson, L. M. (1985). What are students doing when they do all that seatwork?
In C. W. Fisher & D. C. Berliner (Eds.), Perspective on Instructional Time
(pp. 189-202). New York: Longman.
Apple, M. (1985). Old humanists and new curricula: Politics and culture in "The
Paideia Proposal". Curriculum Inquiry, 15(1), 91-106.
Archbald, D. A., & Porter, A. C. (1994). Curriculum control and teachers'
perceptions of autonomy and satisfaction. Educational Evaluation and
Policy Analysis, 16(1), 21-39.
Arzi, H. J., & White, R. T. (2008). Change in teachers' knowledge of subject
matter: A 17-year longitudinal study. Science Education, 92(2), 221-251.
Atkin, J. M., & House, E. R. (1981). The federal role in curriculum development,
1950-80. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 3(5), 5-36.
Baildon, M., & Damico, J. (2008). Negotiating epistemological challenges in
thinking and practice: A case study of a literacy and inquiry tool as a
mediator of professional conversation. Teaching and Teacher Education:
An International Journal of Research and Studies, 24(6), 1645-1657.
2
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986a). From notes made in 1970-71 (V. W. McGee, Trans.). In
C. Emerson & M. Holquist (Eds.), Speech Genres and Other Late Essays
(pp. 132-158). Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986c). Toward a methodology for the human sciences (V. W.
McGee, Trans.). In C. Emerson & M. Holquist (Eds.), Speech Genres and
Other Late Essays (pp. 159-172). Austin: University of Texas Press.
Baki, A., & Guveli, E. (2008). Evaluation of a web based mathematics teaching
material on the subject of functions. Computers & Education, 51(2), 854-
863.
Ball, D. L., & Sharon, F.-N. (1988). Using textbooks and teachers' guides: A
dilemma for beginning teachers and teacher educators. Curriculum
Inquiry, 18(4), 401-423.
Banchero, S. (2006, November 16). Chicago pupils lag in U.S. science test; Less
than 10% of kids are deemed proficient. Chicago Tribune. Retrieved
October 16, 2008, from
http://archives.chicagotribune.com/2006/nov/16/science/chi-
0611160129nov16
Banks, J. A. (2005). Approaches to multicultural curriculum reform. In J. A.
Banks & C. A. M. Banks (Eds.), Multicultural Education: Issues and
Perspectives (5th ed., pp. 242-264). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Bannister, D., & Salmon, P. (1975). A personal construct view of education. New
York University Education Quarterly, 6(4), 28-31.
Basadur, M., Graen, G., & Wakabayashi, M. (1990). Identifying individual
differences in creative problem solving style. Journal of Creative
Behavior, 24(2), 111-191.
Baum, S., Renzulli, J., & Hérbert, T. (1995). Reversing underachievement:
Creative productivity as a systematic intervention. Gifted Child Quarterly,
39(4), 224-235.
3
Baumgartner, E., & Zabin, C. J. (2008). A case study of project-based instruction
in the ninth grade: A semester-long study of intertidal biodiversity.
Environmental Education Research, 14(2), 97-114.
Bejar, I. I., & Doyle, K. O., Jr. (1978). Relationship of curriculum area and course
format with student ratings of instruction. American Educational Research
Journal, 15(4), 483-487.
Benbow, C. P., Lubinski, D., Shea, D. L., & Eftekhari-Sanjani, H. (2000). Sex
differences in mathematical reasoning ability: Their status 20 years later.
Psychological Science, 11(6), 474-480.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality: A
Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
Bidwell, C. E., Frank, K. A., & Quiroz, P. A. (1997). Teacher types, workplace
controls, and the organization of schools. Sociology of Education, 70(4),
285-307.
Binder, A. J. (2000). Why do some curricular challenges work while others do
not? The case of three Afrocentric challenges. Sociology of Education,
73(2), 69-91.
Blase, J. J. (1987). Dimensions of effective school leadership: The teacher's
perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 24(4), 589-610.
Bloome, D., & Clark, C. (2006). Discourse-In-Use. In J. Green, G. Camilli & P.
B. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of Complementary Methods in Education
Research (pp. 227-241). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bogdan, R., & Taylor, S. J. (1975). Introduction to Qualitative Research
Methods: A Phenomenological Approach to the Social Sciences. New
York: John Wiley & Sons.
Boyd, W. L. (1978). The changing politics of curriculum policy-making for
American schools. Review of Educational Research, 48(4), 577-628.
4
Brody, L., & Stanley, J. C. (2005). Youths who reason exceptionally well
mathematically and/or verbally: Using the MVT-D4 model to develop
their talents. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of
Giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 20-37). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, D. S. (1993). Descriptions of two novice secondary teachers' planning.
Curriculum Inquiry, 23(1), 63-84.
Butt, T. (2004). Understanding, explanation, and personal constructs. Personal
Construct Theory & Practice, 1(1), 21-27.
Cantrell, S. C., & Callaway, P. (2008). High and low implementers of content
literacy instruction: Portraits of teacher efficacy. Teaching and Teacher
Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 24(7),
1739-1750.
Carlson, D. L. (1988). Curriculum planning and the state: The dynamics of
control in education. In L. E. Beyer & M. W. Apple (Eds.), The
Curriculum: Problems, Politics, and Possibilities (pp. 98-115). Albany,
NY: State University of New York Press.
Carney, F. M. (1981). Another look at Triad: Practical considerations in
implementing the model. G/C/T(17), 40-43.
Cherryholmes, C. H. (1988a). Construct validity and the discourses of research.
American Journal of Education, 96, 421-457.
Cherryholmes, C. H. (1988b). Power and Criticism: Poststructural Investigations
in Education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Clay, T. W., Fox, J. B., Grunbaum, D., & Jumars, P. A. (2008). How plankton
swim: An interdisciplinary approach for using mathematics & physics to
understand the biology of the natural world. American Biology Teacher,
70(6), 363-370.
5
Clune, W. H. (1993). The best path to systemic educational policy:
Standard/centralized or differentiated/decentralized? Educational
Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(3), 233-254.
Coenders, F., Terlouw, C., & Dijkstra, S. (2008). Assessing teachers' beliefs to
facilitate the transition to a new chemistry curriculum: What do the
teachers want? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19(4), 317-335.
Cornbleth, C. (2008). Climates of opinion and curriculum practices. Journal of
Curriculum Studies, 40(2), 143-168.
Coughlan, R. J. (1969). The factorial structure of teacher work values. American
Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 169-189.
Craig, C. J. (2006). Why is dissemination so difficult? The nature of teacher
knowledge and the spread of curriculum reform. American Educational
Research Journal, 43(2), 257-293.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New
York: Harper Perennial.
Cuban, L. (1993). How Teachers Taught: Constancy and Change in American
Classrooms, 1890-1990. New York: Teachers' College Press.
Cuban, L. (2004). The Blackboard and the Bottom Line: Why Schools Can't Be
Businesses. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Dappen, L., Isernhagen, J., & Anderson, S. (2008). A statewide writing
assessment model: Student proficiency and future implications. Assessing
Writing, 13(1), 45-60.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1994). National standards and assessments: Will they
improve education? American Journal of Education, 102(4), 478-510.
Davis, G. A. (2006). Gifted Children, Gifted Education: A Handbook for
Teachers and Parents. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
6
Day, H. L., & Matthews, D. M. (2008). Do large-scale exams adequately assess
inquiry? An evaluation of the alignment of the inquiry behaviors in New
York state's "living environment Regents examination" to the NYS inquiry
standard. American Biology Teacher, 70(6), 336-341.
Delpit, L. (1995). Other People's Children: Cultural Conflict in the Classroom.
New York: The New Press.
Derrida, J. (1978). Structure, sign, and play in the discourse of the human sciences
(A. Bass, Trans.). In Writing and Difference (pp. 287-294). Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. New York: Free Press.
Diaz-Gemmati, G. M. (1999). "And Justice For All": Using writing and literature
to confront racism. In S. W. Freedman, E. R. Simons, J. Shalhope & A.
Casareno (Eds.), Inside City Schools: Investigating Literacy in
Multicultural Classrooms (pp. 57-76). New York: Teachers College Press.
Donovan, C. A., & Smolkin, L. B. (2001). Genre and other factors influencing
teachers' book selections for science instruction. Reading Research
Quarterly, 36(4), 412-440.
Duax, T. (1989). Preliminary report on the educational effectiveness of a
Montessori school in the public sector. The NAMTA Journal, 14(2), 56-32.
Edgar, D. E., & Warren, R. L. (1969). Power and autonomy in teacher
socialization. Sociology of Education, 42(4), 386-399.
Eisner, E. (1992). Objectivity in educational research. Curriculum Inquiry, 22(1),
9-15.
Eisner, E. (1994). The Educational Imagination: On the Design and Evaluation of
School Programs (3rd ed.). New York: MacMillan College Publishing
Company.
7
Eisner, E. (2004). Multiple intelligences: Its tensions and possibilities. Teachers
College Record, 106(1), 31-39.
Ely, M., Anzul, M., Friedman, T., Garner, D., & Steinmetz, A. M. (1991). Doing
Qualitative Research: Circles Within Circles. London: The Falmer Press.
Ely, M., Vinz, R., Downing, M., & Anzul, M. (1997). On Writing Qualitative
Research: Living by Words. London: Falmer Press.
Engel v. Vitale, 370 U. S. 421 (1962).
Enns, R. (1993). Experiencing the fourth wall: A narrative of graduate teacher
education in curriculum. Curriculum Inquiry, 23(1), 37-61.
Fazio, X., & Melville, W. (2008). Science teacher development through
collaborative action research. Teacher Development, 12(3), 193-209.
Feinberg, B. (2007). The Lucy Calkins project: Parsing a self-proclaimed literary
guru. Education Next(Summer 2007), 27-31.
Feldman, M. (1995). Strategies for Interpreting Qualitative Data. Thousand
Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Firestone, W. A., & Pennell, J. R. (1993). Teacher commitment, working
conditions, and differential incentive policies. Review of Educational
Research, 63(4), 489-525.
Fishkin, A. S., Cramond, B., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (1999). Investigating
Creativity in Youth: Research and Methods. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press,
Inc.
Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on
Language (A. M. S. Smith, Trans.). New York: Pantheon Books.
8
Frank, D. J., Schofer, E., & Torres, J. C. (1994). Rethinking history: Change in
the university curriculum, 1910-90. Sociology of Education, 67(4), 231-
242.
Fraser, J. W. (2001). The School in the United States: A Documentary History.
Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Freire, P. (1995). Pedagogy of the Oppressed (20th ed.). New York: Continuum.
Fuchs, L. S., Deno, S. L., & Mirkin, P. K. (1984). The effects of frequent
curriculum-based measurement and evaluation on pedagogy, student
achievement, and student awareness of learning. American Educational
Research Journal, 21(2), 449-460.
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., & Stecker, P. M. (1991). Effects of
curriculum-based measurement and consultation on teacher planning and
student achievement in mathematics operations. American Educational
Research Journal, 28(3), 617-641.
Fullan, M. (1993). Change Forces: Probing the Depths of Educational Reform.
London: Falmer Press.
Fullan, M. (1999). Change Forces: The Sequel. London: Falmer Press.
Fullan, M. (2007). The New Meaning of Educational Change (4th ed.). New
York: Teachers College Press.
Gallagher, S. A., Stepien, W. J., & Rosenthal, H. (1992). The effects of problem-
based learning on problem solving. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(4), 195-
200.
Gardner, S. A. (2003). The unrecognized exceptionality: Teaching gifted
adolescents with depression. The English Journal, 92(4), 28-32.
9
Ginsburg, M. B. (1986). Reproduction, contradictions, and conceptions of
curriculum in preservice teacher education. Curriculum Inquiry, 16(3),
283-309.
Grossman, P., & Stodolsky, S. (1995). Content as context: The role of school
subjects in secondary school teaching. Educational Researcher, 24(8), 5-
23.
Grossman, P., & Thompson, C. (2008). Learning from curriculum materials:
Scaffolds for new teachers? Teaching and Teacher Education: An
International Journal of Research and Studies, 24(8), 2014-2026.
Gubbins, E. J. (1995). Research Related to the Enrichment Triad Model. Storrs,
CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University
of Connecticut.
Hammersley, M., & Gomm, R. (1997). Bias in social research., Sociological
Research Online (Vol. 2, Available from
http://www.socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/2/1/2.html
Harper, C. A., de Jong, E. J., & Platt, E. J. (2008). Marginalizing English as a
second language teacher expertise: The exclusionary consequence of "No
Child Left Behind". Language Policy, 7(3), 267-284.
Harris, C. R. (1990). The Hollingworth longitudinal study: Follow-up, findings,
and implications. Roeper Review, 12(3), 216-222.
Harrison-Jones, L. (2007). No Child Left Behind and implications for Black
students. The Journal of Negro Education, 76(3), 346-358.
Hart, A. W. (1990). Impacts of the school social unit on teacher authority during
work redesign. American Educational Research Journal, 27(3), 503-532.
Heubert, J. P., & Hauser, R. M. (Eds.). (1999). High Stakes: Testing for Tracking,
Promotion, and Graduation. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
10
Hoekman, K., McCormick, J., & Gross, M. U. M. (1999). The optimal context for
gifted students: A preliminary exploration of motivational and affective
considerations. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43(3), 170-193.
Hume, A., & Coll, R. (2008). Student experiences of carrying out a practical
science investigation under direction. International Journal of Science
Education, 30(9), 1201-1228.
Hutchinson, S. A. (1990). Education and grounded theory. In R. R. Sherman & R.
B. Webb (Eds.), Qualitative Research in Education: Focus and Methods
(pp. 123-134). London: The Falmer Press.
Illinois ex rel. McCollum v. Board of Ed. of School Dist. No. 71, Champaign Cty.,
333 U. S. 203 (1948).
Ingersoll, R. M. (1996). Teachers' decision-making power and school conflict.
Sociology of Education, 69(2), 159-176.
Isaksen, S. G., Puccio, G. J., & Treffinger, D. J. (1993). An ecological approach
to creativity research: Profiling for creative problem solving. Journal of
Creative Behavior, 27(149-170).
Jackson, P. (1992). Conceptions of Curriculum and Curriculum Specialists. In P.
Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Curriculum (pp. 3-40). New
York: Macmillan.
Jetton, T. L., Cancienne, M. B., & Greever, B. (2008). The evolving roles of
faculty learning communities: A university/high school literacy
partnership. Theory Into Practice, 47(4), 327-335.
Kanold, T., Toncheff, M., & Douglas, C. (2008). Two high school districts recite
the ABCs of professional learning communities. Journal of Staff
Development, 29(3), 22-24.
Kauffman, D., Johnson, S. M., Kardos, S. M., Liu, E., & Peske, H. G. (2002).
Lost at sea: New teachers experiences with curriculum and assessment.
The Teachers College Record, 104(2), 273-300.
11
Kelly, G. (1955). The Psychology of Personal Constructs (Vol. 1). New York:
W.W. Norton.
Kelly, G. (1963). Theory of Personality: The Psychology of Personal Constructs.
New York: W. W. Norton.
Kinder, D., & Bursuck, W. (1993). History strategy instruction: Problem-solution-
effect analysis, timeline, and vocabulary instruction. Exceptional
Children, 59(4), 324-335.
Klein, A. G. (2002). A Forgotten Voice: A Biography of Leta Stetter
Hollingsworth. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
Kliebard, H. (1975). Reappraisal: The Tyler rationale. In W. Pinar (Ed.),
Curriculum Theorizing: The Reconceptualists (pp. 70-83). Berkeley, CA:
McCutchan.
Kliebard, H. (2004). The Struggle for the American Curriculum, 1893-1958. New
York: Routledge Falmer.
Koffler, S. L. (1987). Assessing the impact of a state's decision to move from
minimum competency testing toward higher level testing for graduation.
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9(4), 325-336.
Kohn, A. (2000). The Case Against Standardized Testing: Raising the Scores,
Ruining the Schools Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Kohn, A. (2004). What Does It Mean to Be Well Educated?: And More Essays on
Standards, Grading and Other Follies. Boston: Beacon Press.
Krause, C. S. (1984). Enrichment Through Creative Arts. Reston, VA: ERIC
Clearinghouse on Handicapped and Gifted Children.
Kuhn, G. (2008). A quantitative methodology for determining the critical
benchmarks for project 2061 strand maps. Journal of Computers in
Mathematics and Science Teaching, 27(3), 299-324.
12
Lamm, N., & Greer, R. D. (1991). A systematic replication and a comparative
analysis of CABAS. Journal of Behavioral Education, 1(4), 1053-0819.
Landberg, M. (2008, April 4, 2008). State lags in students' writing skills; Three-
quarters of eighth-graders in California score at or below basic level, says
a national study. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved October 16, 2008, from
http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=1456696091&sid=5&Fmt=3&client
Id=9269&RQT=309&VName=PQD
Lawler, E. (1986). High involvement management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Leander, K. M., & Osborne, M. D. (2008). Complex positioning: Teachers as
agents of curricular and pedagogical reform. Journal of Curriculum
Studies, 40(1), 23-46.
Lee v. Weisman, 505 U. S. 577 (1992).
Lee, V. E., Smerdon, B. A., Alfeld-Liro, C., & Brown, S. L. (2000). Inside large
and small high schools: Curriculum and social relations. Educational
Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22(2), 147-171.
Leithwood, K., Menzies, T., & Jantzi, D. (1994). Earning teachers' commitment
to curriculum reform. Peabody Journal of Education, 69(4), 38-61.
Lemke, M., & Gonzales, P. (2006). Findings from the condition of education
2006: U.S. student and adult performance on international assessments of
educational achievement. Boston: Trends in International Mathematics
and Science Study (TIMSS).
Lévinas, E. (2006). Humanism of the Other. (N. Poller, Trans.). Chicago:
University of Illinois Press.
Liu, X., & Fulmer, G. (2008). Alignment between the science curriculum and
assessment in selected NY state Regents exams. Journal of Science
Education and Technology, 17(4), 373-383.
13
Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2006). Study of Mathematically Precocious
Youth after 35 Years: Uncovering antecedents for the development of
math-science expertise. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(4), 316-
345.
Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., Shea, D. L., Eftekhari-Sanjani, H., & Halvorson, M.
B. J. (2001). Men and women at promise for scientific excellence:
Similarity not dissimilarity. Psychological Science, 12(4), 309-317.
MacGillivray, L., Ardell, A. L., Curwen, M. S., & Palma, J. (2004). Colonized
teachers: examining the implementation of a scripted reading program.
Teaching Education, 15(2), 131 - 144.
Markowitz, D. G., Dupr, J., M., Holt, S., Chen, S.-R., & Wischnowski, M. (2008).
BEGIN Partnership: Using problem-based learning to teach genetics &
bioethics. The American Biology Teacher, 70(7), 421-425.
Marks, H. M., & Louis, K. S. (1997). Does teacher empowerment affect the
classroom? The implications of teacher empowerment for instructional
practice and student academic performance. Educational Evaluation and
Policy Analysis, 19(3), 245-275.
Martins, A. M., Vera-Licona, P., & Laubenbacher, R. (2008). "Model your genes
the mathematical way"--A mathematical biology workshop for secondary
school teachers. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications: An
International Journal of the IMA, 27(2), 91-101.
McCaslin, M., & Good, T. L. (1992). Compliant cognition: The misalliance of
management and instructional goals in current school reform. Educational
Researcher, 21(3), 4-17.
McIntosh, R. D. (2008). Teaching art + math. SchoolArts: The Art Education
Magazine for Teachers, 107(8), 64.
McNeil, L. M. (1986). Contradictions of Control: School Structure and School
Knowledge. New York: Routledge.
14
Mendaglio, S. (Ed.). (2008). Dabrowski's Theory of Positive Disintegration.
Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
Meyer, R. J. (2002). Captives of the script: Killing us softly with phonics.
Language Arts, 79(6), 452-461.
Michie, G. (1999). Holler if You Hear Me: The Education of a Teacher and His
Students. New York: Teachers College Press.
Miller, D. G., & Kastberg, S. M. (1995). Of blue collars and ivory towers:
Women from blue-collar backgrounds in higher education. Roeper
Review, 18(1), 27-33.
Mishler, E. G. (1990). Validation in inquiry-guided research: The role of
exemplars in narrative studies. Harvard Educational Review, 60(4), 415-
442.
Morgan, C., McDavid, J. A., & Beedle, J. (2008). Mississippi's articulation
process: A work in progress. Community College Journal of Research and
Practice, 32(2), 135-143.
Morson, G. S., & Emerson, C. (1990). Mikhail Bakhtin: Creation of a Prosaics.
Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Murdoch, S. (2007). IQ: Smart History of a Failed Idea. Hoboken, NJ: John
Wiley & Sons.
Myers, M. (1996). Changing Our Minds: Negotiating English and Literacy.
Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Nir, A. E., & Bogler, R. (2008). The antecedents of teacher satisfaction with
professional development programs. Teaching and Teacher Education: An
International Journal of Research and Studies, 24(2), 377-386.
The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, PL 107-110, (2001).
15
Ogawa, R. T., Sandholtz, J. H., Martinez-Flores, M., & Scribner, S. P. (2003).
The substantive and symbolic consequences of a district's standards-based
curriculum. American Educational Research Journal, 40(1), 147-176.
Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2000). The transition from childhood giftedness to adult
creative productiveness: Psychological characteristics and social supports.
Roeper Review, 23(2), 65-71.
Osisioma, I. U., & Moscovici, H. (2008). Profiling the beliefs of the forgotten
teachers: An analysis of intern teachers' frameworks for urban science
teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19(3), 285-311.
Parnes, S. J., & Noller, R. B. (1972). Applied creativity: The creative studies
project: Part II- results of the two-year-program. Journal of Creative
Behavior, 6, 164-186.
Persell, C. H. (2005). Social class and educational equality. In J. A. Banks & C.
A. M. Banks (Eds.), Multicultural Education: Issues and Perspectives (5th
ed., pp. 87-109). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Piaget, J. (1950). The Psychology of Intelligence. New York: Harcourt.
Pinar, W. (Ed.). (1975). Curriculum Theorizing: The Reconceptualists. Berkeley,
CA: McCutchan Publishing Corporation.
Pinar, W., Reynolds, W., Slattery, P., & Taubman, P. (1995). Understanding
Curriculum: An Introduction to the Study of Historical and Contemporary
Curriculum Discourses (Vol. 17). New York: Peter Lang.
Porter, A. C., & Smithson, J. L. (2001). Are content standards being implemented
in the classroom? A methodology and some tentative answers. In S. H.
Fuhrman (Ed.), From the Capitol to the classroom: Standards-based
reform in the states—One hundredth yearbook of the National Society for
the Study of Education, Part II (pp. 60-80). Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
16
Powell, R. R. (1996). Constructing a personal practical philosophy for classroom
curriculum: Case studies of second-career beginning teachers. Curriculum
Inquiry, 26(2), 147-173.
Pradl, G. (1996). Literature for Democracy: Reading as a Social Act. Portsmouth,
NJ: Heinemann.
Project CONN-CEPT. (2008). Retrieved December 17, 2008, from
http://www.nagc.org/index2.aspx?id=1070&terms=parallel+curriculum+m
odel
Puccio, G. (1999). Creative problem solving preferences: Their identification and
implications. Creativity & Innovation Management, 8(3), 171-179.
Puccio, G., & Murdock, M. C. (Eds.). (1999). Creativity Assessment: Readings
and Resources. Buffalo, NY: Creative Education Foundation.
Purpel, D., & Ryan, K. (1975). Moral education: Where sages fear to tread. Phi
Delta Kappan, 56(10), 659-662.
Purpel, D., & Ryan, K. (1976). It comes with the territory: The inevitability of
moral education in the schools. In D. Purpel & K. Ryan (Eds.), Moral
Education...It Comes with the Territory (pp. 267-275). Berkeley, CA:
McCutchan Publishing Corporation.
Reid, W. (1978). Thinking About the Curriculum. London: Routledge & Keegan
Paul.
Reis, S. M., & Fogarty, E. A. (2006). Savoring reading schoolwide. Educational
Leadership, 64(2), 32-36.
Renzulli, J. (1978). What makes giftedness? Re-examining a definition. Phi Delta
Kappan, 60, 180-184, 261.
17
Renzulli, J. (1982). What makes a problem real: Stalking the illusive meaning of
qualitative differences in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 26(4),
147-156.
Renzulli, J. (1984). Technical report of research studies related to the revolving
door identification model. 2nd edition and addendum. Research Report
Series.
Renzulli, J. (1992). A general theory for the development of creative productivity
through the pursuit of ideal acts of learning. In J. VanTassel-Baska (Ed.),
Curriculum for Gifted and Talented Students (pp. 170-182). Thousand
Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Renzulli, J., & Reis, S. (1994). Research related to the Schoolwide Enrichment
Triad Model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38(1), 7-20.
Resnick, D. P., & Resnick, L. B. (1985). Standards, curriculum, and performance:
A historical and comparative perspective. Educational Researcher, 14(4),
5-20.
Roach, A. T., Niebling, B. C., & Kurz, A. (2008). Evaluating the alignment
among curriculum, instruction, and assessments: Implications and
applications for research and practice. Psychology in the Schools, 45(2),
158-176.
Robinson, E. L. (2008). Evaluation of Academic Achievement at Nine Paideia
Schools. Waco, TX: Baylor University.
RRoller, C. M. (2005). No Child Left Behind: A survey of its impact on IRA
members. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Rosenblatt, L. (1994). The Reader, The Text, The Poem: The Transactional
Theory of the Literary Work (2nd ed.). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois
UP.
Rosenblatt, L. (1995). Literature as Exploration (5th ed.). New York: The
Modern Language Association.
18
Rubin, L. (1994). Muddy curriculum waters. Peabody Journal of Education,
69(4), 21-37.
Schofield, J. W. (2005). The colorblind perspective in school: Causes and
consequences. In J. A. Banks & C. A. M. Banks (Eds.), Multicultural
Education: Issues and Perspectives (pp. 265-314). Hoboken, NJ: John
Wiley & Sons.
School Dist. of Abington Township v. Schempp, 374 U. S. 203 (1963).
Shor, I., & Freire, P. (1987). A Pedagogy for Liberation: Dialogues on
Transforming Education. New York: Bergin & Garvey.
Silverman, L. (1997). The construct of asynchronous development. Peabody
Journal of Education, 72(3/4), 36-58.
Siorenta, A., & Jimoyiannis, A. (2008). Physics instruction in secondary schools:
An investigation of teachers' beliefs towards physics laboratory and ICT.
Research in Science & Technological Education, 26(2), 185-202.
Slattery, P. (1995). Curriculum Development in the Postmodern Era (Vol. 1).
New York: Garland Publishing, Inc.
Sloan, K. (2008). The expanding educational services sector: Neoliberalism and
the corporatization of curriculum at the local level in the US. Journal of
Curriculum Studies, 40(5), 555-578.
Smylie, M. A. (1992). Teacher participation in school decision making: Assessing
willingness to participate. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,
14(1), 53-67.
Stephens, D., Pearson, P. D., Gilrane, C., Roe, M., Stallman, A. C., Shelton, J., et
al. (1995). Assessment and decision making in schools: A cross-site
analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(3), 478-499.
Stone v. Graham, 449 U. S. 39 (1980) (per curiam).
19
Tannen, D. (Ed.). (1993). Framing in Discourse. New York: Oxford University
Press.
Tarr, J. E., Chávez, Ó., R. E., R., & Reys, B. J. (2006). From the written to the
enacted curricula: The intermediary role of middle school mathematics
teachers in shaping students’ opportunity to learn. School Science and
Mathematics, 106, 191-201.
Tatto, M. T. (1996). Examining values and beliefs about teaching diverse
students: Understanding the challenges for teacher education. Educational
Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 18(2), 155-180.
Taylor, L. A. (1995). Undiscovered Edisons: Fostering the Talents of Vocational-
Technical Students. Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the
Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
Todorov, T. (1990). Genres in Discourse (C. Porter, Trans.). Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Tomlinson, C. A., & Callahan, C. M. (1992). Contributions of gifted education to
general education in a time of change. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(4), 183-
189.
Tomlinson, C. A., Kaplan, S. N., Renzulli, J., Purcell, J., Leppien, J., & Burns, D.
(2002). The Parallel Curriculum: A Design to Develop High Potential and
Challenge High-Ability Learners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Torrance, P. (1993). The Beyonders in a thirty year longitudinal study of creative
achievement. Roeper Review, 15(3), 131-195.
Treffinger, D. J., & Isaksen, S. G. (2005). Creative Problem Solving: The history,
development, and implications for gifted education and talent
development. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(4), 342-353.
Tsai, D.-M. (1999). An enrichment model: A study of developing a pilot program
for gifted students. Gifted Education International, 14(1), 66-78.
20
Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering Towards Utopia: A Century of Public
School Reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tyler, R. (1949). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
Tyree, A. K., Jr. (1993). Examining the evidence: Have states reduced local
control of curriculum? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(1),
34-50.
van Driel, J. H., Bulte, A. M. W., & Verloop, N. (2008). Using the curriculum
emphasis concept to investigate teachers' curricular beliefs in the context
of educational reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(1), 107-122.
Venville, G., Sheffield, R., Rennie, L. J., & Wallace, J. (2008). The writing on the
wall: Classroom context, curriculum implementation, and student learning
in integrated, community-based science projects. Journal of Research in
Science Teaching, 45(8), 857-880.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological
processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Weinstein, G., & Fantini, M. (1970). Toward a Humanistic Education: A
Curriculum of Affect. New York: Praeger.
Westbury, I., & Hsu, C.-S. (1996). Structures of curriculum governance and
classroom practice in mathematics. Educational Evaluation and Policy
Analysis, 18(2), 123-139.
White, P. A. (1992). Teacher empowerment under "ideal" school-site autonomy.
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(1), 69-82.
Wilde, S. (1990). Teacher autonomy and nonsexist curriculum: Case studies from
two rural schools. Curriculum Inquiry, 20(1), 41-62.
21
Wood, G. (2004). A view from the field: NCLB's effects on classrooms and
schools. In D. Meier & G. Wood (Eds.), Many Children Left Behind: How
the No Child Left Behind Act is Damaging Our Children and Our Schools
(pp. 33-50). Boston: Beacon Press.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage Publications.
Young, J. H. (1979). Teacher participation in curriculum decision making: An
organizational dilemma. Curriculum Inquiry, 9(2), 113-127.
Young, J. H. (1985). Participation in curriculum development: An inquiry into the
responses of teachers. Curriculum Inquiry, 15(4), 387-414.
Zellermayer, M. (1997). When we talk about collaborative curriculum-making,
what are we talking about? Curriculum Inquiry, 27(2), 187-214.