Bibliography
1. Richmond, Phyllis Allen, "fchnt Are We Looking For?"; Science% vol. 139* February 22f 1965#
2% G. Salton, Automatic Information Organization and Retrieval; McGraw Hill Book Co., 19&8, Chapter I.
3. G. Salton, Automatic Information Organization and Retrieval; ilcGraw Hill Book Co., 19o©t Chapter II.
4. G. Salton and M. E. Lesk; Computer Evaluation of Indexing and Text Processing; Scientific Report No. ISR-12 to the National Science Foundation Section III, Department of Computer Science, Cornell University; June, 1967.
5« G. Saltonf Automatic Information Organization and Retrieval; McGraw Hill Book Co., 19bb, Chapter VII.
6. M. E. Lesk and G. Salton; Evaluation of Interactive Search and Retrieval Methods Using Automatic Information Displays; Technical Report No. 68-17t Department of Computer Science, Cornell University, revised September, 1968.
7. ti. Rubinoff, S. Bergman, W. Franks, and 3. Rubinoff; Experimental Evaluation of Information Retrieval Through a Teletypewriter; Communications of the ACM, Volume 11, No* 9f September, 1968.
6. J. J. Rocchio, Relevance Feedback in Information Retrieval; Report ISR-9 to the National Science Foundation, Chapter 23.
9# J. J. Rocchio, Document Retrieval System Optimization and Evaluation; Harvard University Doctoral Thesis, Report ISR-10 to the National Science Foundation, Harvard Computation Laboratory; June, 196%
10. J. J. Rocchio, G. Salton, Search Optimization and Iterative Retrieval Techniques; Proceedings of the Fall Joint Computer Conference« Las Vegas, November, 196%
llo 0. W. Riddle, T. Horwitz, R. Dietz, Relevance Feedback in Information Retrieval Systems; Report ISR-11 to the National Science Foundation, Chapter 6, Department of Computer Science, Cornell University; June, 1966.
12. R. Crawford and H. Melzer; The Use of Relevant Documents Instead of Queries in Relevance Feedback; Scientific Report No* ISR-14 to the National Science Foundation, Section XIII; Department of Computer Science, Cornell University) October, 1968.
i
1$. D. Steinbuhlsr and C. Aleta; Negative Relevance Feedback Process; student reports, Computer Science 43bt Department of Computer Science, Cornell University, Spring, 1968.
14 • J* Kelly; Negative Response Relevance Feedback; Scientific Report No. ISR-12 to the National Science Foundation Section IX, Department of Computer Science, Cornell University; June, 1967•
15# 0* Salton, The Evaluation of Automatic Retrieval Processes, Selected Test Results Usine; the Sf/ART System; American Documentation. Vol* 16, No. 3* July* 196%
16« F. Wilcoxon, R. Wilcox, Some Rapid Approximate Statistical Procedures; Lederle Laboratories, America Cyanamid Company, 1964.
17« H. Hall, N. Weiderman, The Evaluation rroblem in Relevance Feedback Systems; Scientific Report No. ISR-12 to the National Science Poundation, Section XII, Department of Computer Science, Cornell University, June, 1967.
16. C. Cleverdon, E. IA. Keen, Factors Determining the Performance of Indexing Systems, Vol. 2, ASLIB Cranfield Research Project, 1966, Chapter III.
19* fcU Leak, G. Salton, Design Criteria for Automatic Information Systems, Report ISR-11 to the National Science Foundation, Chapter V, Department of Computer Science, Cornell University, June 1966.
20# G. Salton, Automatic Information Organization and Retrieval ; McGraw Hill Book Co., 1968, Chapter VlT"
21# R. Steel, J. Torrie, Principles & Procedures of Statistics, McGraw Hill Book Co., i960, Chapter 2T.~
22« G. Salton, Search Strategy^and The Optimization of Retrieval Sffectiveness; Scientific Report No. ISR-12 to the National Science Foundation, Section V* Depart- , ment of Computer Science, Cornell University; June, 1967»
25# Leech and Matlack; Information Retrieval: Dictionary Representation and Cluster Evaluation; Scientific Report No# ISR-12 to the National Science Foundation, Section VII, Department of Computer Science, Cornell University; June, 1967•
24# Williamson, Williamson, and Ide; The Cornell Programs for Cluster Searching and Relevance Feedback, Scientific He-port No. ISR-12 to the National Science Foundation, Section 17, Department of Computer Science, Cornell University; June| 1967»
205
25# R« Grauer and M. Messier, An Evaluation of Pocchiof8 Clustering Algorithm, Scientific Report No* ISR-12 to the National Science Foundation, Section VT, Department of Computer Sciencef Cornell University, Junef 1V67.
26* A. Borodin, L# Kerr, F# Lewis, Query Splitting in Relevance Feedback Systems, Scientific Report No# ISR-14 to the National Science Foundation, Section XII, Department of Computer Science, Cornell University, October, l'768o
27© M# Davis, M« Linsky, M. Zelkowitz; A Relevance Feedback System Employing a Dynamically evolving Document Space; Scientific Report No, ISR-14 to the National Science Foundation, Section X, Department of Computer Science, Cornell University, October, 1^68.
23. £• Brauen, R. Holt, T* wilcox, Index Space Modification Based on Relevance Feedback, Scientific Report Noa ISR-14 to the National Science Foundation, Section XI, Department of Computer Science, Cornell University, October, 1968.
29* No Nilseon^ Learning M chines. New Yorki McGraw-Hill, 196%