Download - Brenda S_Inquiry Project 1
-
8/14/2019 Brenda S_Inquiry Project 1
1/38
The Fetal Stem Cell Debate: How HighThe Fetal Stem Cell Debate: How High
School Biology Students Separate FactualSchool Biology Students Separate Factual
Information from Agenda on the InternetInformation from Agenda on the Internet
Brenda SteigerBrenda Steiger
CEP 806 Internet Inquiry ReportCEP 806 Internet Inquiry Report
https://reader010.{domain}/reader010/html5/0628/5b34f65ed046e/5b34f6604674a.jpghttps://reader010.{domain}/reader010/html5/0628/5b34f65ed046e/5b34f6604674a.jpg
-
8/14/2019 Brenda S_Inquiry Project 1
2/38
My purpose for this inquiry:My purpose for this inquiry:
I wanted to know more about howmy students use the internet toform opinions and obtaininformation about science issues.
-
8/14/2019 Brenda S_Inquiry Project 1
3/38
Internet Issues:Internet Issues:
According to Bruce Bertram in hisAccording to Bruce Bertram in his
article,article, Credibility of the Web:Credibility of the Web:Why we Need Dialectical ReadingWhy we Need Dialectical Reading(2001),(2001), users of the web holdusers of the web holddifferent perspectives on thedifferent perspectives on thereliability of its text.reliability of its text.
Where are my students at?Where are my students at?
-
8/14/2019 Brenda S_Inquiry Project 1
4/38
Internet Inquiry ProjectInternet Inquiry Project
Questions:Questions:
Through online discussions withThrough online discussions with
other teachers and my readings, Iother teachers and my readings, Ihave formed three questions thathave formed three questions that
I think will help me uncover whatI think will help me uncover whatmy students think about themy students think about the
internet as a source ofinternet as a source of
information.information.
-
8/14/2019 Brenda S_Inquiry Project 1
5/38
How do high school biologyHow do high school biology
students come to terms withstudents come to terms withconflicting information regardingconflicting information regarding
fetal stem cells on the internet?fetal stem cells on the internet?
Question #1:Question #1:
-
8/14/2019 Brenda S_Inquiry Project 1
6/38
Are they able to separateAre they able to separateinformationinformation that is more factualthat is more factual
in nature fromin nature from information thatinformation that
has some underlyinghas some underlying
agenda?agenda?
Question #2:Question #2:
-
8/14/2019 Brenda S_Inquiry Project 1
7/38
Which criteria do they use toevaluate the credibility ofdifferent websites relating to fetal
stem cells?
Question #3:Question #3:
-
8/14/2019 Brenda S_Inquiry Project 1
8/38
How would my 21 biology students
respond to the three questions?
Heres what I thought.
Predictions:Predictions:
-
8/14/2019 Brenda S_Inquiry Project 1
9/38
How do high school biology students come to terms withHow do high school biology students come to terms withconflicting information regarding fetal stem cells on the internet?conflicting information regarding fetal stem cells on the internet?
Their opinions will first be based onTheir opinions will first be based ontheirtheir initial feelings about the issue,initial feelings about the issue,regardless ofregardless of the information thethe information thewebsites contain. Givenwebsites contain. Given their reliancetheir reliance
on particular search engines, Ion particular search engines, I thenthenpredict that a few students will want topredict that a few students will want to
look to sites for information other thanlook to sites for information other thanthethe three that I provide.three that I provide.
Prediction #1:Prediction #1:
-
8/14/2019 Brenda S_Inquiry Project 1
10/38
Prediction #1:Prediction #1:
BackgroundBackgroundThrough my online discussions, I base myThrough my online discussions, I base my
prediction on a common theme amongprediction on a common theme among
students:students:
they prefer to rely on typical sitesthey prefer to rely on typical sites
like Wikipedia as a source oflike Wikipedia as a source of
informationinformation
Websites with user-friendlyWebsites with user-friendlyformats are preferred over thoseformats are preferred over those
of less familiar sitesof less familiar sites
-
8/14/2019 Brenda S_Inquiry Project 1
11/38
How do they separate information that is factualHow do they separate information that is factual
from information that has some other agenda?from information that has some other agenda?
Students will have difficulty indetermining the underlying purposes
behind any particular sitescontent.
Prediction #2:Prediction #2:
-
8/14/2019 Brenda S_Inquiry Project 1
12/38
Prediction #2Prediction #2
Background:Background:My students may not yet have the skills toMy students may not yet have the skills todifferentiate between the treasures and thedifferentiate between the treasures and the
junk of science information on the internet.junk of science information on the internet.
The web today hides its preciousThe web today hides its precioustreasures behind a greater mass oftreasures behind a greater mass of
semiprecious or junk-grade texts.semiprecious or junk-grade texts.--Bertram, Bruce.--Bertram, Bruce. Digital Content: TheDigital Content: The
Babel of Cyberspace. JAAL (1999)Babel of Cyberspace. JAAL (1999)
-
8/14/2019 Brenda S_Inquiry Project 1
13/38
Prediction #3Prediction #3
What criteria do they use to evaluate the credibility of different websitrelating to fetal stem cells?
Most will have a few ideas about how toidentify
a legitimate site, but will not be able toname more than one particular criteria
to evaluate it.
Most will know what the domains .com, .organd .gov stand for, but will not have opinio
as to legitimacy for each.
-
8/14/2019 Brenda S_Inquiry Project 1
14/38
Prediction #3:Prediction #3:
Background InformationBackground InformationLike spoken language, technological literacyLike spoken language, technological literacyis continually evolving, and students willis continually evolving, and students will
need the training and experience to copeneed the training and experience to copewith these changes, according to the article,with these changes, according to the article,Twenty-First Century LiteracyTwenty-First Century Literacy(1998) J Flood,(1998) J Flood,S.B. Heath, & D Lapp (Eds,).S.B. Heath, & D Lapp (Eds,).
Are my students prepared to deal withAre my students prepared to deal withthese changes?these changes?
-
8/14/2019 Brenda S_Inquiry Project 1
15/38
www.gothamgazette.comwww.gothamgazette.com
My Inquiry Plan:My Inquiry Plan:
Project StepsProject Steps
-
8/14/2019 Brenda S_Inquiry Project 1
16/38
Step 1:Step 1:
I introduced basic information to the studentsI introduced basic information to the studentsregarding the biology of the stem cell to getregarding the biology of the stem cell to get
them thinking.them thinking.
http://http://www.stemcellnews.com/index/images/stemcellimage.jpgwww.stemcellnews.com/index/images/stemcellimage.jpg
http://www.stemcellnews.com/index/images/stemcellimage.jpghttp://www.stemcellnews.com/index/images/stemcellimage.jpg -
8/14/2019 Brenda S_Inquiry Project 1
17/38
Step 2:Step 2:
I provided my students with theI provided my students with the
addresses of three websites ofaddresses of three websites of
differing points of view.differing points of view.
-
8/14/2019 Brenda S_Inquiry Project 1
18/38
Right to Life of Michigan (RTL)Right to Life of Michigan (RTL)http://www.rtl.org/html/stem_cell_resources/ihttp://www.rtl.org/html/stem_cell_resources/i
ndex.htmlndex.html
National Institute of HealthNational Institute of Health(NIH)(NIH)
http://stemcells.nih.gov/http://stemcells.nih.gov/
Medra, Inc.Medra, Inc.http://www.medra.com/index.htmlhttp://www.medra.com/index.html
-
8/14/2019 Brenda S_Inquiry Project 1
19/38
I allowed students time to browseI allowed students time to browse
each of the three websites, andeach of the three websites, andthen they filled out athen they filled out a
questionnaire based on the threequestionnaire based on the three
inquiry questions.inquiry questions.
Step 3:Step 3:
-
8/14/2019 Brenda S_Inquiry Project 1
20/38
I compiled questionnaireI compiled questionnaire
information and conducted follow-information and conducted follow-
up interviews with a fewup interviews with a few
representative students.representative students.
Step 4:Step 4:
-
8/14/2019 Brenda S_Inquiry Project 1
21/38
Student Task #1 Results:Student Task #1 Results:
Students compared and contrasted the positive andStudents compared and contrasted the positive and
negative aspects of fetal stem cell research presentednegative aspects of fetal stem cell research presented
on each of the three websites.on each of the three websites.
How did the students handle conflictedHow did the students handle conflictedor perhaps de-emphasized informationor perhaps de-emphasized information
about fetal stem cell researchabout fetal stem cell researchcontained on each site?contained on each site?
-
8/14/2019 Brenda S_Inquiry Project 1
22/38
Task #1 Results:Task #1 Results:
Typical Student ResponsesTypical Student Responses
All of the sites had good information.All of the sites had good information.
Maybe more science should be done toMaybe more science should be done to
figure it out.figure it out. Medra says that it helped people. ItMedra says that it helped people. It
(fetal stem cell therapy) should be(fetal stem cell therapy) should be
allowed.allowed.
I dont think fetuses should be killed,I dont think fetuses should be killed,because there may be other ways tobecause there may be other ways to
cure diseases.cure diseases.
-
8/14/2019 Brenda S_Inquiry Project 1
23/38
Task #1 Results:Task #1 Results:
Five students indicated that theyFive students indicated that they
werent sure what to do with thewerent sure what to do with theconflicted or de-emphasizedconflicted or de-emphasizedinformation on these three sites. Theyinformation on these three sites. They
spent some time looking upspent some time looking upinformation elsewhere.information elsewhere.
-
8/14/2019 Brenda S_Inquiry Project 1
24/38
Task #1 Analysis:Task #1 Analysis:
Some students expressed strongSome students expressed strongopinions from either side of the debateopinions from either side of the debatebased on both what they saw on thebased on both what they saw on thesites and through somesites and through somepreconceptions that they held.preconceptions that they held.
Unfortunately, they were more eagerUnfortunately, they were more eager
to express an opinion about the issueto express an opinion about the issuethan to give an indication of how theythan to give an indication of how theyarrived at it.arrived at it.
-
8/14/2019 Brenda S_Inquiry Project 1
25/38
Task #1 Analysis:Task #1 Analysis:
The students responded as IThe students responded as I
predicted, evaluating the positivepredicted, evaluating the positive
and negative sides of stem celland negative sides of stem celluse from a limited perspective.use from a limited perspective.
This issue turned out to be newThis issue turned out to be new
for most of them, so many didntfor most of them, so many didntknow what to think whenknow what to think when
presented with various sources ofpresented with various sources of
information.information.
-
8/14/2019 Brenda S_Inquiry Project 1
26/38
Student Task #2:Student Task #2:
Students matched the followingStudents matched the following
statements with what theystatements with what they
thought would characterize eachthought would characterize each
of the three sitesof the three sites
-
8/14/2019 Brenda S_Inquiry Project 1
27/38
Task #2Task #2
Students choseStudents chose all that appliedall that appliedtoto
each of the 3 sites:each of the 3 sites:
to maketo make moneymoney.. toto persuadepersuade people into thinking apeople into thinking a
certain way.certain way.
to simplyto simply informinform people about thispeople about this
topic.topic.
-
8/14/2019 Brenda S_Inquiry Project 1
28/38
Task #2 Results:Categorizing sites by
agenda
0
4
8
12
16
20
PERSUADE
0
4
8
12
16
20
MONEY
0
4
8
1216
20
INFORM
RTL
Medra
NIH
-
8/14/2019 Brenda S_Inquiry Project 1
29/38
Task #2 Analysis:Task #2 Analysis:
All of the students indicated thatAll of the students indicated thatthe NIH website intended to bethe NIH website intended to beinformative in nature. In myinformative in nature. In myprediction, I underestimated theirprediction, I underestimated theirability to notice this.ability to notice this.
-
8/14/2019 Brenda S_Inquiry Project 1
30/38
Task 2 Analysis:Task 2 Analysis:
Most students placed the Medra, IncMost students placed the Medra, Incwebsite into all three categories.website into all three categories.Some indicated that the testimonialsSome indicated that the testimonials
from patients on this site made itfrom patients on this site made itparticularly informative in nature.particularly informative in nature.
The site doesnt explicitly state theThe site doesnt explicitly state the
costs of their services, yet mostcosts of their services, yet moststudents recognized that Medra, Inc isstudents recognized that Medra, Inc isa business. I did not predict that theya business. I did not predict that theywould see this.would see this.
-
8/14/2019 Brenda S_Inquiry Project 1
31/38
Task #2 Analysis:Task #2 Analysis:
The Right to Life website elicitedThe Right to Life website elicited
various responses, but mostvarious responses, but mostagreed that it was persuasive inagreed that it was persuasive innature.nature.
Many students indicated that theyMany students indicated that theyassociated this organization withassociated this organization withits anti-abortion stance.its anti-abortion stance.
-
8/14/2019 Brenda S_Inquiry Project 1
32/38
Student Task #3Student Task #3
Students were asked to make a list ofStudents were asked to make a list of
the items found on a website thatthe items found on a website thatwould indicate that it was a goodwould indicate that it was a good
source of information.source of information.
-
8/14/2019 Brenda S_Inquiry Project 1
33/38
Task #3:Task #3:
Typical Student ResponsesTypical Student Responses
How do you know a website containsHow do you know a website containsfactual information?factual information?
It explains things well.It explains things well. If its like wikipedia.If its like wikipedia.
It has lots of information.It has lots of information. It isnt selling something.It isnt selling something. If it was posted by a scientist.If it was posted by a scientist.
-
8/14/2019 Brenda S_Inquiry Project 1
34/38
Task #3 Analysis:Task #3 Analysis:
My students already have some goodMy students already have some good
ideas as to what constitutes a reliableideas as to what constitutes a reliable
website.website.
When comparing the considerationsWhen comparing the considerations
listed on the Johns Hopkins Universitylisted on the Johns Hopkins University
website,website, Evaluating Information FoundEvaluating Information Foundon the Interneton the Internet, my students matched, my students matched
a few.a few.
-
8/14/2019 Brenda S_Inquiry Project 1
35/38
Task #3 Analysis:Task #3 Analysis:
Students already have someStudents already have some
concept of these criteria:concept of these criteria:
AuthorshipAuthorship
Publishing bodyPublishing body
Point of viewPoint of view
-
8/14/2019 Brenda S_Inquiry Project 1
36/38
Task #3 Analysis:Task #3 Analysis:
Students need reminders or instructionStudents need reminders or instruction
in these evaluation criteria:in these evaluation criteria:
Referral to other sourcesReferral to other sources VerifiabilityVerifiability CurrencyCurrency Distinguishing propaganda,Distinguishing propaganda,
misinformation, and disinformationmisinformation, and disinformation
-
8/14/2019 Brenda S_Inquiry Project 1
37/38
Emergent ideasEmergent ideas::
High school students have grown upHigh school students have grown up
with the web; their experiences havewith the web; their experiences have
provided them already with some ofprovided them already with some ofthe tools for finding reliablethe tools for finding reliable
information.information.
They still require instruction inThey still require instruction in
evaluating science information on theevaluating science information on theweb. The more they know about aweb. The more they know about a
topic, the better they get at suchtopic, the better they get at such
evaluations.evaluations.
-
8/14/2019 Brenda S_Inquiry Project 1
38/38
Emergent Ideas:Emergent Ideas:
In such a survey, the way aIn such a survey, the way a
question is presented canquestion is presented can
determine the quality of the datadetermine the quality of the datacollected.collected.
I would like to take more time inI would like to take more time in
comparing my results with thosecomparing my results with thoseof my online colleagues, to see ifof my online colleagues, to see if
my results are typical for othermy results are typical for other
t d tt d t