Download - Bruin 2000
-
8/18/2019 Bruin 2000
1/22
Gender, organizational and
professional identities in
journalism
Marjan de Bruin
Caribbean Institute of Media and Communication,University of the West Indies
A B S T R A C T
The emphasis of this review essay is on gender in journalism, placed in the context of
work done by media professionals in news organizations. In the recent debates on
this topic, certain aspects of news production practice are assigned crucial roles:
gender, journalistic professionalism, and the media organization. This essay reviews
the literature on each of these aspects and identifies where and how concepts of gender identity, professional identity and organizational identity occur. At the con-
ceptual level, inconsistencies in concepts are pointed out and a preliminary position-
ing of gender, professional and organizational identity in media organizations is
suggested. This review also argues that in certain countries, a shifting balance can be
observed: a growing hegemony of organizational identity over professional identity in
which gender seems to be a casualty of conflicts outside gender relations per se.
K E Y W O R D S gender identity journalistic profession media organization news production organizational identity professional identity
Introduction
The question which sparked this review essay is how gender should be viewed
as a variable in (news) production within a media organization in relation
to what is commonly called professionalism. In other words, what happens
on the work floor of media organizations, especially editorial departments,
when journalists – in this case, women – try to follow professional values andpractices and at the same time try to fulfil organizational demands?
Before undertaking any research into this area, I tried to develop a clearer
understanding of the factors that seem to be crucial to this question: gender
Journalism
Copyright © 2000 SAGE Publications
(London, Thousand Oaks, CA and New Delhi)
Vol. 1(2): 217–238 [1464-8849(200008)1:2;217–238;013418]
REVIEW ESSAY
at UNIV OF NORTH DAKOTA on May 28, 2015 jou.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://www.sagepub.co.uk/http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/http://www.sagepub.co.uk/
-
8/18/2019 Bruin 2000
2/22
and media production, professionalism, the media organization and the way
these interconnect.
Each of these areas has its own tradition of discussion and study. The
organizational context of media production has been a topic of research forover 50 years, resulting in a stream of media organizational studies. The media
professional involved in news production – as an employee as well as a
member of a professional community – has also been the subject of various
studies. Women and media, widened in recent years to ‘gender’ and media, has
been the topic of continuing discussion in academic and journalistic circles.
However, the intersection of media organizational theories, studies on pro-
fessionalism and gender remained largely unexamined. The most recent
debates on this topic explain the central concepts, define them occasionally,
but leave much to be explored. They seem to be defined at different levels and
from different angles; their interconnection has remained implicit or described
only partially.
This essay reviews the literature on media organizations, professionalism
and recent debates on gender in media production, then tries to point out
the inconsistencies in the concepts and suggests a preliminary alternative
positioning of gender, professional and organizational identity in media
organizations.
Studies in media organizations
Over the last 50 years, media studies, or sociological studies of media organiza-
tions and news production, have reflected a variety of approaches and angles,
expressing the dominant – or fashionable – paradigm of the time (Bagdikian,
1971; Breed, 1955; Curran, 1990a, 1990b; Curran et al., 1982; Dimmick, 1979;
Elliot, 1977; Epstein, 1973; Esser, 1998; Flegel and Chaffee, 1971; Gallagher,
1982; Gieber, 1956; Hall, 1973; Hirsch, 1977; Johnstone, 1976; Murdock and
Golding, 1977; Pool and Schulman, 1959; Schlesinger, 1990; Schudson, 1991;
Sigal, 1973; Sigelman, 1973; Tracey, 1978; Tuchman, 1978; Tunstall, 1971;
White, 1950).
Between the early 1950s and the beginning of the 1970s, the main
emphasis in research on media organizations was along the perspective that
White (1950) had put forward. White’s focus and that of some of his con-
temporaries (Gieber, 1956; Pool and Schulman, 1959) was the individual
professional: how judgements on news selection were affected by the gate-keeper’s personal and idiosyncratic biases.
Breed (1955), in his study on social control in the newsroom, recognized
the pressure to conform to corporate style and culture. His focus reflects an eye
218 Journalism 1(2)
at UNIV OF NORTH DAKOTA on May 28, 2015 jou.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/
-
8/18/2019 Bruin 2000
3/22
for interpersonal behaviour and group dynamics as factors that control the
behaviour of the newsroom workers. Power, influence and control were seen as
functions of the organizational hierarchy, but ‘the organization’ itself – as a
source of constraints, influencing or determining media production – was notexplicitly at the core of his analysis.
The immediate organizational working environment, the occupational
bureaucracies – colleagues and editors – were also noticed much later, in the
late 1960s and early 1970s, when research focused on external social pressures
(defined as the views of editors and readers), but did not examine these
pressures as organizational constraints (Flegel and Chaffee, 1971).
Most of the early studies on news production seem to look at the media
organization from a functionalist perspective. The organization was perceived
as a neutral entity; the behaviour of its employees was seen as determined by
their position in the hierarchy. Power differences based on organizational
positions provided the key to understanding. That perspective led Tunstall
(1971) to conclude – reflecting on the mid 1960s in the UK as well as the USA
– that adequate organizational study on communications organizations did
not exist.
Tunstall’s own description of media organizations (1971) went further
than focusing on individual and interpersonal relationships. It was much
more elaborate than anything seen in media literature till then, differentiatingthe variety of goals, orientations and priorities with their potential for con-
flicts. His central themes – ‘much occupational behaviour can be seen in terms
of responding to uncertainty’ and journalism must be seen as an ‘indetermin-
ate and segmented occupation’ – (Tunstall, 1971:6) relate to insights from
sociology, psychology and organizational theory.
The complexity of the relationship between occupational behaviour,
professional beliefs and organizational values in media production was
pointed out by several other authors in the early 1970s (e.g., Epstein, 1973;
Sigal, 1973; Sigelman, 1973).
At about the same time in the UK, Stuart Hall was adding a different
dimension to the debate: the ideological ‘common ground’ of media organiza-
tions and structures of power – and the institutional connections between
both ‘spheres’ – became a major factor in approach and analysis (Hall, 1973).
One of the analytical consequences of this perspective was mentioned by
Elliot: since media organizations should be seen as ‘producers of cultural
artifacts which will appeal to mass markets’ (Elliot, 1977:164), analysis of
media organizations should be done as ‘the analysis of the production of media culture under the conditions of democratic capitalism’ (p. 143).
In trying to pull it all together, Hirsch (1977) structured the research
findings on media organizations from the early 1950s up to his time of writing
De Bruin Gender, organizational and professional identities 219
at UNIV OF NORTH DAKOTA on May 28, 2015 jou.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/
-
8/18/2019 Bruin 2000
4/22
along three levels of analysis: occupational, organizational and institutional,
examining relationships between organizations or professions and the larger
societal environment in which they operate. But Hirsch, at that time working
at the University of Chicago, did not refer to the ideological questions raisedby his British colleagues. A similar angle was taken by Johnstone (1976),
reporting on organizational constraints on news work and Dimmick (1979),
looking at media organizations as ‘political coalitions’. Their studies did not
connect media organizations to wider cultures or larger power structures.
This last aspect was emphasized by Curran et al. (1982), in pointing out
the need to look at cultural interests and macro-economics, reflecting on
previous years of research on media organizations. Curran et al. focussed on
the way in which different researchers have perceived the power of the mass
media and how these different perspectives affected the interpretation of ‘the
media organization’. A pluralist interpretation saw media organizations as
largely autonomous, with media professionals on equal footing with political
and economic institutions. It looked at professional behaviour as determined
and inspired by professional ideologies and journalistic principles. A Marxist
interpretation assumed that the dynamics in culture producing industries,
e.g. media organizations, could be understood primarily in terms of their
economic determination and their submission to dominant culture and
ideology (Curran et al., 1982).Various authors during these years argued that the liberal–pluralist, as well
as the Marxist perspective, obscured the complexities of the internal and
external relations of media production. They called for a linkage and in-
tegration of approaches (Gallagher, 1982; Tracey, 1978).
This attempt to re-balance the approaches of political economy and
cultural insights in studying media organizations can be seen in the wave
of reflection published at the beginning of the 1990s on the way news
organizations, or media, have been looked at. Authors (Curran, 1990a, 1990b;
Berkowitz, 1990; Schlesinger, 1990; Schudson, 1991; Shoemaker, 1997) spoke
of ‘rethinking’, ‘revisiting’, ‘reappraising’, ‘refining’.
Some of the recent studies on news organizations use an organizational
perspective, describing the structures which channel editorial control and
journalistic autonomy, showing also ‘how much editorial structures . . . have
formed professional role understanding’ (Esser, 1998: 394).
Studies on journalistic professionalism
Most of the earlier studies on professional journalists discuss professionalism
as an identification with a certain set of belief systems concerning the
220 Journalism 1(2)
at UNIV OF NORTH DAKOTA on May 28, 2015 jou.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/
-
8/18/2019 Bruin 2000
5/22
functions of the media and the role of journalists. For McLeod and Hawley in
the 1960s (1964), a professional, in defining his (they didn’t say: ‘or her’) job,
will emphasize certain characteristics: the job is unique and delivers an
essential service, it isn’t something you do just so, it demands ‘intellectualactivity’ and it includes a broad range of autonomy. The professional journal-
ists will also exhibit ‘distinctive patterns of cognitive judgement and differing
specific attitudes’ (McLeod and Hawley, 1964: 538). Other literature (John-
stone et al., 1972/1973; McLeod and Rush, 1969; Menanteau-Horta, 1967)
adds to this the broader social obligations that come with being a professional
as well as the view that professional culture is transmitted through a long
period of socialization.
The wider context in which the notion of professionalism in journalism
was developing was brought into focus by, among others, Schudson (1978),
who interpreted the growth of (US) journalism towards a profession ‘as a
response to the unrestrained market-oriented journalism’ of the first half of
the 20th century.
What, in the meantime, this profession at the practical level was supposed
to be, in the eyes of the professional, was not at all clear. Values, supposed to
be crucial to the profession, were continuously under scrutiny – objectivity
versus subjectivity; detachment versus advocacy; observer versus watchdog
(Johnstone et al., 1972/1973: 522). Professional practice reflected many differ-ent positions in this debate leading to sometimes conflicting professional
orientations and identities – even within the same organization or medium
(Burns, 1972[1964]). These conflicting orientations didn’t seem to weaken the
idea of a professional basis of journalism. Johnstone et al. in the 1970s found
very widespread support among American journalists for investigative journal-
ism, which challenged ‘objectivity’ and ‘detachment’ – for decades seen as
essential in the professional’s behaviour (Johnstone et al., 1972/1973: 528).
What is actually defined as core values in the journalistic profession was –
and still is – extremely difficult to identify and to generalize. Surveys in the
1990s among professional journalists on professional roles and values as well
as reporting practices for 12 countries spread over six regions worldwide show
agreement on one or two professional roles, but a great variety of opinions on
others (Weaver, 1998). The role ‘getting information to the public quickly’ was
generally seen as ‘very important’ and there was ‘some agreement’ on ‘the
importance of providing access for the public to express opinions’ (Weaver,
1998: 465).
On other roles, however, the rankings show extreme variations. Forinstance, what is seen by US journalists as one of the four most important roles
of journalism, being a watchdog on government, is valued as the least
important role by journalists in countries as diverse as Algeria, Germany and
De Bruin Gender, organizational and professional identities 221
at UNIV OF NORTH DAKOTA on May 28, 2015 jou.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/
-
8/18/2019 Bruin 2000
6/22
Chile (Weaver, 1998). ‘Reporting accurately or objectively’, which is the
highest ranking role for journalists in Taiwan, is seen as the least important by
British journalists – even less important than ‘providing entertainment’.
Journalists in the vast majority of the other countries surveyed, however, saw
‘providing entertainment’ as the least important professional role of journal-
ists (Weaver, 1998: 466, 467). But then again, ‘on various measures of pro-
fessional orientation . . . British journalists are as a group “less professional”
than their U.S. colleagues’ (Henningham and Delano, 1998: 159).
It is not only that the professional roles are judged quite differently
around the globe, but there are very different values given to such questions as
which dimensions of the job are considered to be most important and whether
some ethically questionable reporting practices might be justified in the caseof an important story. The only practice that seems almost universally agreed
on is not revealing news sources when confidentiality has been promised
(Weaver, 1998: 479).
What Johnstone et al. wrote almost 30 years ago – that apparently, there
were occupational segments, organized around alternative professional identi-
ties, while other elements of the professional ideology were commonly shared
(1972/1973: 540) – still seems to be the case. Perceptions by journalists of the
core values in their profession, professional identities, differ considerably
worldwide, and sometimes even within one country or region. Sometimes
they reflect what appear to be contradictory orientations on functions and
priorities, as for instance an identification with ‘public journalism’ as well as
with the more traditional ‘disseminator function’ (Weaver, 1998). Often they
seem to embrace bits of different ideologies, leading to pluralistic or confused
role perceptions.
The vast differences in professional orientation make it impossible to
generalize about the actual profile of ‘the professional identity’. The presence
of an idea of ‘a’ professional identity is the most that can be said.
Studies on gender and media production
In work on gender and media production, much has been done on the
qualities of content: representation of women in media content; the analysis
of the ‘masculine narrative form’ of news discourse; the unbalanced and one-
sided gender choice in the use of sources. Van Zoonen (1994) in the bench-mark Feminist Media Studies gives a comprehensive overview of this and
various other aspects. Here I focus specifically on studies done on women’s
occupational role in (news)media organizations.
222 Journalism 1(2)
at UNIV OF NORTH DAKOTA on May 28, 2015 jou.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/
-
8/18/2019 Bruin 2000
7/22
Women’s presence in media organizations and their – often minor – share
in ownership and control, and the skewed media employment patterns have
been frequent topics of research worldwide. During the late 1970s into the
1980s, several case studies on the position of women in the media hierarchyand the role of women in the organizational production process began to
appear in the professional journals: on male and female gatekeepers – do they
respond differently to news stories of women? (Scott Whitlow, 1977); on
women’s page/lifestyle editors – does sex make a difference in the final
product? (Merritt and Gross, 1978); on job satisfaction among newspaper-
women (Barrett, 1984); on goals and achievement orientations of women
newspaper managers (Sohn, 1984); on perceived career barriers for female
television news anchors (Ferri and Keller, 1986). And Bleske (1991) replicates –
40 years after White’s classic on ‘Mr. Gates’ – the gatekeeper study for ‘Ms.
Gates’. Of course, there is no comparison possible with the original study since
White didn’t assess gender in his research.
Some of the studies with a general focus began to differentiate by gender,
sometimes revealing striking perceptions. For instance, Joseph (1982: 219),
researching reporters’ and editors’ preferences toward reporter decision-
making, writes about female editors: ‘It is perceived these females are extrem-
ely hungry to maintain their status and to advance’ and, therefore, ‘the fewer
reporter challenges the better’.Mostly descriptive research on gender and media during the early 1990s,
in many cases under the heading of women and media and usually undertaken
by women, added valuable information to the overall picture of what was
happening inside media organizations. There was a heavy emphasis on por-
trayal of gender in media content but also a steady stream of research on
gender patterns in media employment. The latter initially didn’t go beyond
descriptive accounts of male and female physical presence in media organiza-
tions (Burks and Stone, 1993; De Bruin, 1994; Gallagher, 1981; Gallagher and
Von Euler, 1995; Gallagher and Quindoza-Santiago, 1994; Jimenez-David,
1996; Mills, 1997; Robinson and Saint-Jean, 1998; Weaver, 1997; Weaver and
Wilhoit, 1996).
Gallagher and Von Euler (1995) attempted to broaden the picture geo-
graphically and produced one of the first and of the very few global standard
reference books on gender patterns in media employment. Although some
regions are not well represented or are totally absent, and others are over-
represented (Europe for instance), the overall picture is easily recognizable in
many countries: in most of the cases, women form a minority in the mediaworkforce; they occupy a minor fraction of middle management in media
organizations, especially news organizations; and are even more seriously
under-represented in senior management.
De Bruin Gender, organizational and professional identities 223
at UNIV OF NORTH DAKOTA on May 28, 2015 jou.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/
-
8/18/2019 Bruin 2000
8/22
Weaver and Wilhoit are less pessimistic for US journalists and observed
that women journalists gained managerial responsibility and influence during
the 1980s. This was true especially in weekly newspapers and magazines,
where women were approaching parity with men in numbers by 1992 (1996:
181, 182). But a closer look at the same statistics also shows a lower percentage
of women than men to have a ‘great deal’ of influence when push comes to
shove: on hiring and firing (Weaver and Wilhoit, 1996: 182, 184).
A methodological problem in comparing available research is that a part
of the studies relates to women’s overall share in media jobs (media organiza-
tions in general), while another part limits itself to news departments specific-
ally. For instance, a major part of Gallagher and Von Euler’s global data deals
with ‘all employees: permanent full-time staff and people engaged on tempor-ary contracts . . . all occupational groups’ (1995: 11). But Weaver and Wilhoit,
in their substantial analysis of three major surveys among journalists in the
USA, deal only with full-time editorial or news people responsible for the
information content of English-language mainstream general interest news
media (1996: 247).
Some authors tried to go one step further, looking at correlations between
women’s presence in the media organization and certain qualities of content
(Jolliffe and Catlett, 1994), but mainly from a gender-neutral perspective. Do
female writers choose different subjects in their stories (Weaver, 1997)? Do
women differ in their ratings of media priorities (Weaver, 1997; Weaver and
Wilhoit, 1996)? Does the greater presence of women’s writings on the New York
Times’s front pages have anything to do with what appeared to be a wider
range of stories of special interest to women offered by this paper (Mills,
1997)?
It is only recently that there has been more systematic research on the
interaction of gender and organizational variables. In 1994, Van Zoonen
observes ‘There exist very few studies that examine the interaction of gender
with organizational variables’ (p. 55). And four years later, Carter et al. still
confirm that the media politics of gender – in other words ‘how gender
relationships shape (journalism’s) forms, practices, institutions and audiences’
– ‘deserve much more critical attention than they have typically received to
date’ (Carter et al., 1998: 3).
This shortage of research is not exceptional. Organizational theory in
general has neglected gender aspects (Alvesson and Billing, 1997; Halford
et al., 1997; Martin and Collinson, 1999). This is partly because both genderand organizational culture ‘are phenomena which the analytical and anato-
mizing mentality of organizational studies finds difficult to grasp’ (Gherardi,
1995:12).
224 Journalism 1(2)
at UNIV OF NORTH DAKOTA on May 28, 2015 jou.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/
-
8/18/2019 Bruin 2000
9/22
The recent literature on gender and media production shows a changing
perspective. Counting men and women, identifying positions and mapping
employment patterns is regarded as necessary and useful baseline data but it is
also seen as only scratching the surface of the realities of media organizations.In order to learn more about what is actually taking place on the work floor, it
is necessary to go beyond the ‘body count’ and to start looking at specific
social practices, embodied in conventions and rules, formally and informally,
based on history and tradition, sustained by people working in the media
organizations (De Bruin, 1998).
Various authors over the last few years have began to problematize gender
and media production by defining and looking at the gendered substructures
in the media organizations (Allan, 1998; Carter, 1998; Kitzinger, 1998; Skid-
more, 1998; Steiner, 1998; Van Zoonen, 1998b). Earlier studies which had
looked at the division of labour in media organizations into ‘male’ and
‘female’ areas, or at vertical segregation – examples of gendered substructures
– had presented these realities more as labour profiles within an organization
than as processes taking place in an organizational culture. The emphasis had
been more on figures, on job and task descriptions than on symbols, values,
meanings and significations. The focus had mainly been on overviews of
employment patterns and less on cultural interpretations of everyday work,
actions and language, as feminine or masculine, structuring relations in themedia organization.
The relatively recent emphasis on gendered substructures, on gendered
realities embedded in news production practices, has led to various starting
points of analysis. Some authors choose to take off from the influence of the
‘macho culture of newsgathering’ produced by male dominance in the news-
room. This culture excludes women journalists, making them feel that their
feminist or feminine concerns are ‘not what is required of a true news
professional’ (Skidmore, 1998: 207, 209). Others underlined how men, by
insisting on defining women journalists in terms of their sex, rather than as
professionals, stopped women from gaining advancement, because journalism
and femininity – in men’s view – didn’t go together. They looked at the
interaction in the newsroom where women had to position themselves in a
male culture and where professional culture and gender were at odds with each
other (Steiner, 1998).
The news discourse, as part of the newsroom’s culture, was seen as
carrying its own gender politics by standards of news ‘objectivity’ and ‘ways of
knowing’ (Allan, 1998; Kitzinger, 1998). Kitzinger attempted to uncover thegender-politics in news coverage by identifying the subtle processes ‘such as
the selective privileging of “masculine” over “feminine” discourses and “ways
of knowing” (logic versus emotion, science versus intuition)’ (1998: 187). She
De Bruin Gender, organizational and professional identities 225
at UNIV OF NORTH DAKOTA on May 28, 2015 jou.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/
-
8/18/2019 Bruin 2000
10/22
pointed at the asymmetrical judgements about men’s and women’s emotions
and credibility that shape the production of news and argued how ‘the
positions of men and women within media hierarchies interact with gendered
values to create particular tendencies in the coverage’ (Kitzinger, 1998:198).
Interconnections between studies
In the studies on the media organizations, media professionals and gender in
media production reviewed earlier in this article, we can find some initiatives
to make interconnections. The media organization studies of the 1970s
and early 1980s (Elliot, 1977; Epstein, 1973; Gallagher, 1982; Sigal, 1973;Sigelman, 1973; Tuchman, 1978; Tunstall, 1971) show several examples of
these cross-boundaries linkages.
Sigelman indicated very clearly that the professional ‘holds dual citizen-
ship. He is, to a greater or lesser extent, committed to the methods and goals
of both his organization and his profession’ (1973: 141). To avoid conflicts
between these two commitments, the organization will create control-
structures, tension-avoiding processes, Sigelman argued.
Sigal (1973) showed the self-serving functions of professional ideals andEpstein (1973) pointed at the power of the organization, often implied and
difficult to notice, to alter professional values. He also recognized the complex-
ity of these inter-relationships: do personal values of newsmen (Epstein’s
word) shape the organization they work for, or vice versa?
Occupational ideals could in fact serve what suits the organizational
structure at a particular time (Elliot, 1977) – a view supported by Tuchman’s
study ‘that professionalism serves organizational interests by reaffirming the
institutional processes in which newswork is embedded’ (1978: 12). Notions,
accepted within the occupation, could be used to ‘strategically control’ com-
municators (Gallagher, 1982). On the other hand, organizations could also
accommodate these occupational notions. Beam (1990) focused on the ques-
tion to what degree the media organization was willing to accommodate the
professional behaviour and professional standards of journalists. His central
concept for this kind of relationship between ‘organization’ and ‘profession’
became ‘organizational professionalism’ (Beam, 1990: 9). The key ques-
tion, according to Beam, was to determine who defines the organizational
space that allows professional behaviour. To conceptualize the profession insuch terms of power relationships was a perspective, that, according to
Beam, was ‘virtually ignored’ till then – 1990 – in the body of journalistic work
(1990: 2).
226 Journalism 1(2)
at UNIV OF NORTH DAKOTA on May 28, 2015 jou.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/
-
8/18/2019 Bruin 2000
11/22
Up to the late 1970s, many – perhaps most – of the studies on media
organizations made no differentiation in findings between men and women.
Media workers were seen as employees (although a special kind) always in
the double bind of being a ‘professional’ in a subordinate, organizational,position. Gender remained mostly unmentioned in relation to the dynamics
of media organizations.
The emphasis in the recent discussion on gender in (news) media produc-
tion and gender in journalism has been on the one hand on the connection
between gender and professionalism – in which professionalism refers to
professional practice of women in the newsroom (Allan, 1998; Carter et al.,
1998; Creedon, 1993; Kitzinger, 1998; Steiner, 1998; Van Zoonen, 1998b;
Weaver, 1997) or to the presence of professional women in the newsroom
(e.g. Beasley, 1993; De Bruin, 1999; Gallagher, 1981, 1982; Gallagher and
Quindoza-Santiago, 1994; Gallagher and Von Euler, 1995) – and on the other
hand on the dynamics between the organization and gender (Van Zoonen,
1998a).
In trying to capture gender and professionalism as variables in media
production, the catch phrase has become ‘gender orientation in journalism’
or ‘gendered professionalism’. Van Zoonen (1998b: 35, 36) structures ‘the
gendered nature of journalism’ along the lines of topic selection (female
journalists feel that topics relevant to women are neglected or marginalized);angles and styles; the choice of sources and spokespersons (overwhelmingly
male) and ethical values (female journalists claiming to hold a set of ethical
values different to that of their male colleagues).
In an earlier publication, Van Zoonen urged us to distinguish between the
different categories, or domains of journalisms. The two major dimensions she
used in distinguishing such domains were ‘the goals of journalistic organiza-
tions’ – referring to Tunstall’s Journalists At Work – and ‘gender’ (Van Zoonen,
1998a:125, 126, 128). ‘The particular articulations of structure and subjectivity
found in each domain produce various forms of agency within journalism and
construct so-called “organizational identities” of journalists’ (Van Zoonen,
1998a: 123).
Conceptual difficulties
In the recent debates, the concepts ‘professional’ and ‘organizational’ are used
by different authors in different ways. Some introduce these terms as thevarious levels of individuals working together and combine both concepts by
focussing on ‘gendered professionalism’ through an organizational context’
(Skidmore, 1998: 208). ‘Organizational’ sometimes refers to the newsroom,
De Bruin Gender, organizational and professional identities 227
at UNIV OF NORTH DAKOTA on May 28, 2015 jou.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/
-
8/18/2019 Bruin 2000
12/22
other times to the media organization as a whole, but the references are used
interchangeably. From time to time these two seem to blend in the ‘organiza-
tion of the profession’, referring to the media organization.
Also, ‘journalistic organizations’ and ‘media organizations’ are used syn-
onymously, with a reference to Tunstall (Van Zoonen, 1998a), who, however,
did not use these concepts in the same way. He differentiated between ‘news
organizations’ and ‘media organizations’ (Tunstall, 1971: 25). In the latest
discussions, this differentiation has disappeared from the analysis. Likewise,
there is no clear distinction made between ‘the culture of the newsroom’ and
‘the culture of the media organization’. This observation may look like
splitting hairs, but in using these terms as synonyms, the probable tension
between professional identity and organizational identity dissolves.‘Professionalism’ and ‘professional identity’ seem to be defined mainly by
focussing on the professional values of ‘objectivity’ and ‘detachment’, which
are used in one breath and seem to indicate one and the same core value. Yet,
in recent discussions journalists remind us that these concepts are not the
same: moving away from detachment does not require the professional
to abandon journalistic objectivity (Merritt, 1998: 25). Some authors place
‘objectivity’ alongside ‘professionalism’ and ‘routines of bureaucracy’ which
together ‘disempowered individual reporters’ (Steiner, 1998:147). Others focus
on the professionalized formulation of ‘objectivity’ as the guiding principle of
so-called impartial journalism, which should be looked at as ‘an androcentric
instance of definitional power to the extent that it ex-nominates . . . those
truth-claims which do not adhere to masculinist assumptions about the social
world’ (Allan, 1998: 129).
In all debates, media organization, professionalism and gender play
crucial roles. The interplay between these variables is a complex process with
overlapping, coinciding, and contradicting positions and locations. It seems as
if the descriptions of practices, discourses, and identifications in the variouscase studies and essays, actually prepare new ground for distinguishing –
certainly at a conceptual level, but in later research also at an operational level
– organizational, professional and gender identity.
Organizational, professional and gender identities
The distinction between professional identity and organizational identity is
clear at a conceptual level. In reality, however, the difference is not alwaysobvious; certainly not in recent times where organizational interests, often
driven by economics, seem to have become much more influential at all levels.
What journalists believe to be a unique professional ideology – professional
228 Journalism 1(2)
at UNIV OF NORTH DAKOTA on May 28, 2015 jou.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/
-
8/18/2019 Bruin 2000
13/22
identity – may very well be a proxy for organizational values with which they
identify – organizational identity in disguise.
I prefer to look at ‘organizational identity’ – and I borrow from Whetten
and Godfrey (1998) – as the shared understanding among the members of an
organization of ‘who-we-are’, of what makes the organization distinctive from
other organizations – as a relational and comparative concept. This under-
standing is collectively constructed through a continuously renegotiated set of
meanings and meanings structures (Whetten and Godfrey, 1998: 35, 36). It
corresponds with what Du Gay (1997) calls a social constructionist approach
which highlights ‘the ways in which work meaning and identity are culturally
and historically constructed’ (p. 297).
Organizational identity in this approach is a framework of beliefs, valuesand feelings. Not a stable, fixed, completed collection, but rather a changing
schema with a range of varieties forming multiple identities, depending on the
specific interaction with the immediate and wider environment. In this view,
organizational identity is not constructed in a single, linear process, but is
constructed through many processes within the context of an organizational
culture, in which notions of gender also exist.
‘Organizational identity’ is connected to a cultural and spatial ‘territory’ –
in this case the (news media) organization – and is carried by those who form
part of the organization, as long as they belong to it. ‘Professional identity’
refers to a wider frame of reference – an ideology – not so much carried by the
members of a clearly identifiable organization, but rather by an imaginary
community, that stretches across organizations. Moving out of a particular
organization doesn’t necessarily imply an ending of the professional identity;
however, it usually does mean the end of a particular organizational iden-
tity.
Closely connected with organizational identity are the concepts ‘reputa-
tion’ – how the environment defines the organizational identity – and ‘image’
– the way insiders believe outsiders see the organization (Gioia, 1998: 23).
Reputation and image also play a role in the formation and continuation of
professional identity. The decline of public trust in professional journalists, for
instance, currently taking place in various countries is affecting the ‘reputa-
tion’ of the professional, influencing professional identity. In Europe, efforts
to restore the damaged reputation of the profession by organizing media
accountability are high on the agenda of the European Journalism Centre. In
the USA, the American Society of Newspaper Editors (ASNE) is determined toidentify the causes of declining credibility of the media in order to ‘regain the
confidence and respect’ of the audience. In pursuit of this aim it has created a
3-year, in-depth, million-dollar project (ASNE, 1998).
De Bruin Gender, organizational and professional identities 229
at UNIV OF NORTH DAKOTA on May 28, 2015 jou.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/
-
8/18/2019 Bruin 2000
14/22
The image of the organization – what journalists think of how outsiders
see their organization, whether it is seen as successful or not – is still ‘one of
the most important predictors of job well-being’ for journalists (Weaver and
Wilhoit, 1996: 110).In the debates under discussion in this article, professional identity and
organizational identity are not new concepts, but they haven’t always been
made explicit. In the discussion on the profession and the media organization,
Beam’s (1990) study on ‘organizational professionalism’ described conditions
for organizational identity-forming, but the concept of organizational identity
itself didn’t surface.
In the debate on gender and production in media organizations, the
question of ‘organizational identity’ surfaced recently. Van Zoonen mentioned
‘organizational identity’ a few years ago but gives a more refined and precise
definition in recent work. In explaining the productivity of organizational
powers, she states that ‘specific organizational policies and budgets, routines,
job requirements, market needs etc. are intersected by discourses of sub-
jectivity – among which are those of gender and ethnicity – and construct an
organizational identity that reflects the individual styles and preferences of
the communicator and the structural imperatives of the media organization,
and which is more than the sum of its parts’ (Van Zoonen, 1998a: 137). In her
conceptual model, ‘professionalism’ is part of, or is absorbed by, ‘structures’, aconcept which refers to many other influences on media production, all
constituting ‘organizational identity’ (Van Zoonen, 1998a: 137). Organiza-
tional identity is positioned as ‘more or less coterminous with agency’ and
agency ‘refers to what journalists do within the structural constraints posed by
the organization of the profession and is thus always embedded in organiza-
tional routines and pressures’ (Van Zoonen,1998a: 137, 128).
This is where I would like to introduce a different emphasis. The absorp-
tion of professionalism by ‘structures’ may be the direction in which the
profession is developing, but judging from US and global research findings we
certainly haven’t gotten there yet. Research findings are indicating, or at least
can be interpreted as doing so, that the traditional tension between news
organizations and media organizations, or between professional identity and
organizational identity, still exists and is experienced by many journalists
(Shoemaker and Reese, 1991; Weaver, 1998; Weaver and Wilhoit, 1996).
However, the relationship between what is taken to be central to the organiza-
tion by journalists – organizational identity – and what they take for granted
as principles of their profession and professional standards – professionalidentity – is more and more a source of serious conflict.
230 Journalism 1(2)
at UNIV OF NORTH DAKOTA on May 28, 2015 jou.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/
-
8/18/2019 Bruin 2000
15/22
Gender and journalistic production: shifting balances, merging
identities or changing hegemony?
Organizational limitations are influencing one of the most crucial compo-nents of journalists’ professional profile and satisfaction with work: auton-
omy. For the first time in three decades barely half of the US journalists in
Weaver’s study saw themselves as having the kind of clout in the newsroom
that their predecessors did (Weaver and Wilhoit, 1996: 62). They felt their
freedom was limited significantly by ‘internal organizational constraints
of editorial control, time-space limits, or inadequate staffing’ (Weaver and
Wilhoit, 1996: 65). The diminishing autonomy in the newsroom was, accord-
ing to some journalists, ‘a result of the ascendance of a corporate culture’
(Weaver and Wilhoit, 1996: 62). Journalists in the USA are not alone in this
view; various examples from other countries can be found in Weaver’s collec-
tion of surveys (Weaver, 1998).
The formal and informal, organizational policy restrictions on what can
be defined as ‘newsworthy’ have limited, more and more, the professional
judgement on this aspect. The concern for profit over quality and the need to
compete in the market – organizational interests – are seen by professional
journalists as leading to corrosive effects (Weaver and Wilhoit, 1996: 65, 67).
Journalists cannot perform adequately as professionals (Weaver, 1998).Since the early 1970s, we have known that US journalists are more likely
to have high job satisfaction (which by the way has gone down, Weaver and
Wilhoit, 1996: 101) if they think their organization is doing a good job – a
finding confirmed in many other countries (Weaver, 1998: 478). In Taiwan,
the second most important predictor of job satisfaction is journalists’ rating of
their news organization (Lo, 1998: 81). The opposite can also be found: a
majority of Algerian journalists surveyed in 1986 rated their news organiza-
tions as doing a fair or poor job and a substantial part of them felt a lack of
interest and respect toward the profession (Kirat, 1998: 335). They showed a
low level of job satisfaction. In either case, the organization’s image – the way
insiders believe outsiders see the organization – influenced the individual
professional’s satisfaction.
In various instances – e.g., Australia, Korea, Germany, the USA, the UK –
journalists judge the organization’s product to be too influential in the
formation of public opinion and state their belief that this influence should be
less (Weaver, 1998). This distancing of themselves from the organization’s
output may be interpreted as an attempt to separate professional identity froman increasing hegemonic organizational identity.
In some countries – for instance, the USA – the traditional characteristics
of professional identity seem to be fading out. In the 1990s, only 7 percent of
De Bruin Gender, organizational and professional identities 231
at UNIV OF NORTH DAKOTA on May 28, 2015 jou.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/
-
8/18/2019 Bruin 2000
16/22
all journalists were members of the largest professional association in the USA,
compared to almost three times as many three decades ago (Weaver and
Wilhoit, 1996: 128). Readership of professional literature also showed a steep
decline.Commitment to journalism is no longer a motivation for additional
training. Two of the now more important factors that correlate are lack of
experience and salary (Weaver and Wilhoit, 1996: 45) – both instrumental in
getting or keeping a job. By 1992, the percentage of journalists planning to
leave the profession had almost doubled over a decade and was almost four
times as high as in the early 1970s (Weaver and Wilhoit, 1996: 111).
The increasing influence of the media organization on job-satisfaction
and quality of work is affecting journalists’ perception of responsibilities. We
could perhaps say that in these cases organizational identities are shaping, or
re-shaping, ‘professional identities’.
Gender notions have been recognized in certain professional values affect-
ing professional identity. Some see this as masculinity (as currently defined by
western societies) according so much better with journalism’s values – ‘that
men’s professional identities are much less fragmented and problematic than
those of women in journalism. . . . Female journalists working in traditional
news journalism therefore have a much more fragmented and contradictory
professional identity than men’ (Van Zoonen, 1998b: 39, 45). But is it thatjournalism ‘accords’ with masculine values or is it perhaps that its values have
been constructed to fit masculine values? Traditionally developed by male
decision makers, who used to monopolize decision making positions, certain
styles and values will have become accepted as professional standards, and at
the same time will have become part of the organization’s house-style – ‘that’s
how-we-do-it-here.’
Others see professional values as subordinate to the ‘social and cultural
expectations of the macho newsroom that women are expected to work
within’ (Skidmore, 1998: 208). The positions of men and women within the
media organizations’ hierarchy ‘interact with gendered values to create partic-
ular tendencies in the coverage’ (Skidmore, 1998: 198). Sometimes journalists
define situations as gender-neutral while at the same time indicating that
gender does play a significant role, and in doing so, they seem to make
contradictory statements. For instance, in a Finnish survey 74 percent of the
Finnish journalists, men and women, said that their gender had not been an
important career factor (Heinonen, 1998: 173). Yet, 41 percent of the women
in the same group said that their sex did have a negative impact on theirsalary, and more than 34 percent claimed that it had adversely affected their
career opportunities. What seem to be contradictory answers can be better
understood when using the distinction between organizational, professional
232 Journalism 1(2)
at UNIV OF NORTH DAKOTA on May 28, 2015 jou.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/
-
8/18/2019 Bruin 2000
17/22
and gender identity. In some answers, organizational or professional identity
dominated the responses; in others, gender identity seems to be the prime
frame of reference.
From an organizational identity point of view, ‘who-we-are’ has become
very diluted. The increased pace of globalization, the agglomeration of media
interests of all kinds and the effects of the internet have more and more
blurred the traditional points of identification and may overwhelm them
entirely. The pressures of the market in some instances have led to the deeper
integration of news organizations into entertainment networks. In other
instances, competition has led to an entertainment culture, not always appre-
ciated by, or sympathetic to, the professional. These same market develop-
ments, however, seem to offer women more opportunities in journalism: ‘Thenews genre is changing and therefore more women can enter journalism as a
profession’ (Van Zoonen, 1998b: 45).
In many regions, the organizational environment of media organizations
has changed drastically: the number of media has multiplied; the size of most
media has increased; their nature and production have changed, influenced by
changes in ownership structure and technological changes. The organization’s
interest is to work at the appearance of consistency over time and place, in
spite of these changes. Organizational identity is constructed with the balance
shifted toward flexibility – to be able to adapt rapidly (Whetten and Godfrey,
1998: 22).
Professional identity, on the other hand, with its eroding culture and poor
support structure may not be strong enough to withstand economic pressures
dominating organizational culture and changing organizational identity.
Developments in organizational identity and professional identity may not
always be ‘in step’ any more; the balance may be shifting.
But there may be more at stake than shifting balances. In certain coun-
tries, research findings on journalists’ perceptions of their profession indicate
the growing hegemony of organizational identity over professional identity
and an increasing tension between the two. Against this background gender
seems to be a casualty of conflicts outside of gender relations per se. In
societies where there are not too many media outlets, professional identity will
probably be absorbed by the strong demands of organizational identity. In
situations where the presence of more media offers a greater horizontal
mobility, new professional identities may emerge (e.g., ‘public journalism’). In
some instances, organizational identity may be responsible for structuring,determining and maybe even absorbing professional identity.
Since there is no generally accepted approach to almost anything in
journalism anymore, except the former macho tough-guy investigative role,
De Bruin Gender, organizational and professional identities 233
at UNIV OF NORTH DAKOTA on May 28, 2015 jou.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/
-
8/18/2019 Bruin 2000
18/22
the greater presence of women seems more likely to be decided not by
professional judgment but by personal bias and market needs. It may be seen
as simply an attempt to soften and domesticate the profession. Bring it ‘in-
home’ rather than in-house. Male journalists’ response to the entry of women
may then be a disguised protest against this market-driven dilution of the
journalist’s role and the changes in media.
References
Allan, Stuart (1998) ‘(En)gendering the Truth Politics of News Discourse’, in Cynthia
Carter, Gill Branston and Stuart Allan (eds) News, Gender and Power , pp. 121–37.London and New York: Routledge.
Alvesson, Mats and Yvonne Due Billing (1997) Understanding Gender and Organizations.
London: Sage.
ASNE (1998) ‘The ASNE Journalism Credibility Project: Why Newspaper Credibility
Has Been Dropping’, a report for the American Society of Newspaper Editors.
Bagdikian, Ben H. (1971) The Information Machines – Their Impact on Men and the Media.
New York: Harper & Row.
Barrett, Grace H. (1984) ‘Job Satisfaction among Newspaperwomen’, Journalism
Quarterly Autumn: 593–9.
Beam, Randal A. (1990) ‘Journalism Professionalism as an Organizational-LevelConcept’, Journalism Monographs: 121.
Beasley, Maurine H. (1993) ‘Newspapers – Is There a New Majority Defining the
News?’ in Pamela J. Creedon (ed.) Women in Mass Communication, 2nd edn,
pp. 118–33. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Berkowitz, Dan (1990) ‘Refining the Gatekeeping Metaphor for Local Television
News’, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 34: 55–68.
Bleske, Glen L. (1991) ‘Ms. Gates Takes Over – An Updated Version of a 1949 Case
Study,’ Newspaper Research Journal 12: 88–97.
Breed, W. (1955) ‘Social Control in the Newsroom: A Functional Analysis’, Social Forces
37: 109–16.
Burks, Kimberly K. and Vernon A. Stone (1993) ‘Career-related Characteristics of Male
and Female News Directors’, Journalism Quarterly 70(3): 542–9.
Burns, Tom (1972[1964]) ‘Commitment and Career in the BBC’, in Denis McQuail
(ed.) Sociology of Mass Communications, pp. 281–310. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Carter, Cynthia, Gill Branston and Stuart Allan (eds) (1998a) News, Gender and Power .
London: Routledge.
Carter, Cynthia, Gill Branston and Stuart Allan (1998b) ‘Setting New(s) Agendas: An
Introduction’, in Cynthia Carter, Gill Branston and Stuart Allan (eds) News,
Gender and Power , pp. 1–9. London and New York: Routledge.
Creedon, Pamela J., ed. (1993) Women in Mass Communication, 2nd edn. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage.
Curran, James, Michael Gurevitch and Janet Woollacott (1982) ‘The Study of the
Media: Theoretical Approaches’, in Michael Gurevitch, Tony Bennett, James
234 Journalism 1(2)
at UNIV OF NORTH DAKOTA on May 28, 2015 jou.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/
-
8/18/2019 Bruin 2000
19/22
Curran and Janet Woollacott (eds) Culture, Society and the Media, pp. 11–30.
London: Methuen.
Curran, James (1990a) ‘The New Revisionism in Mass Communication Research: A
Reappraisal’, European Journal of Communication 5(2–3): 135–64.
Curran, James (1990b) ‘Culturalist Perspectives of News Organizations: A Reappraisal
and a Case Study’, in Marjorie Ferguson (ed.) Public Communication: The New
Imperatives, pp. 114–34. London: Sage.
De Bruin, Marjan (1994) Women and Caribbean Media, Occasional Paper (3). Kingston,
Jamaica: CARIMAC.
De Bruin, Marjan (1996) ‘A New Impetus in the Caribbean’, in Rina Jimenez-David
(ed.) Women’s Experiences in the Media, pp. 96–101. Manila: Isis International;
London: WACC.
De Bruin, Marjan (1998) ‘Gender in Caribbean Media, Beyond the Body Count’, paper
presented to the 21st Scientific Conference & General Assembly of the Inter-
national Association for Media and Communication Research, University of
Strathclyde, Glasgow, July 26–30.
De Bruin, Marjan (1999) ‘Gender, Media Production and Output’, Media Development
XLVI(2): 50–4.
Dimmick, John W. (1979) ‘The Gatekeepers: Media Organization as Political
Coalitions’, Communication Research 6(2): 203–22.
Du Gay, Paul (1997) ‘Organizing Identity: Making Up People at Work’, in Paul du Gay
(ed.) Production of Culture/Cultures of Production, pp. 286–322. London: Sage, in
association with The Open University.
Elliot, Philip (1977) ‘Media Organizations and Occupations: An Overview,’ in J.
Curran, M. Gurevitch and J. Woollacott (eds) Mass Communication and Society ,
pp. 142–73. London: Edward Arnold.
Epstein, Edward Jay (1973) News from Nowhere, Television and the News. New York:
Vintage Books.
Esser, Frank (1998) ‘Editorial Structures and Work Principles in British and German
Newsrooms’, European Journal of Communication 13(3): 375–405.
Ferri, Anthony J. and Jo E. Keller (1986) ‘Perceived Career Barriers for Female
Television News Anchors’, Journalism Quarterly 63: 463–7.
Flegel, Ruth C. and Steven H. Chaffee (1971) ‘Influences of Editors, Readers and
Personal Opinions on Reporters’, Journalism Quarterly 48 Winter: 645–51.
Gallagher, Margaret (1981) Unequal Opportunities: The Case of Women and the Media.
Paris: UNESCO.
Gallagher, Margaret (1982) ‘Negotiation of Control in Media Organizations and
Occupations’, in Michael Gurevitch, Tony Bennett, James Curran and Janet
Woollacott (eds) Culture, Society and the Media, pp. 151–73. London: Methuen.
Gallagher, Margaret and Lilia Quindoza-Santiago (eds) (1994) Women Empowering
Communication: A Resource Book on Women and the Globalisation of Media. London:
WACC; Manila: Isis International and New York: Methuen.
Gallagher, Margaret with My von Euler (1995) ‘An Unfinished Story: Gender Patterns
in Media Employment’, Reports and Papers on Mass Communication, 110. Paris:
UNESCO Publishing.
Gherardi, Silvia (1995) Gender, Symbolism and Organizational Cultures. London: Sage.
Gieber, Walter (1956) ‘Across the Desk: A Study of 16 Telegraph Editors’, Journalism
Quarterly 33: 422–32.
De Bruin Gender, organizational and professional identities 235
at UNIV OF NORTH DAKOTA on May 28, 2015 jou.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/
-
8/18/2019 Bruin 2000
20/22
Gioia, Dennis A. (1988) ‘From Individual to Organizational Identity’, in David A.
Whetten and Paul C. Godfrey (eds) Identity in Organizations: Building Theory
through Conversations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Halford, Susan, Mike Savage and Anne Witz (1997) Gender, Careers and Organisations.
London: Macmillan.
Hall, Stuart (1973) ‘The “Structured Communication” of Events’, stencilled occasional
papers. Birmingham: Centre for Cultural Studies, University of Birmingham.
Heinonen, Ari (1998) ‘The Finnish Journalist: Watchdog with a Conscience’, in David
H. Weaver (ed.) The Global Journalist: News People around the World , pp. 161–90.
Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Henningham, John and Anthony Delano (1998) ‘British Journalists’, in David H.
Weaver (ed.) The Global Journalist: News People around the World , pp. 143–60.
Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Hirsch, Paul M. (1977) ‘Occupational, Organizational, and Institutional Models inMass Media Research: Toward an Integrated Framework’, in Paul M. Hirsch, Peter
V. Miller and F. Gerald Kline (eds) Strategies for Communication Research, Sage
Annual Reviews of Communication Research 6, pp. 13–42. Beverly Hills, CA and
London: Sage.
Jimenez-David, Rina, ed. (1996) Women’s Experiences in the Media. Manila: Isis Inter-
national; London: WACC.
Johnstone, John W.C. (1976) ‘Organizational Constraints on Newswork’, Journalism
Quarterly Spring: 5–13.
Johnstone, John W.C., Edward J. Slawski and William W. Bowman (1972/1973) ‘The
Professional Values of American Newsmen’, Public Opinion Quarterly XXVI(1):52–4.
Jolliffe, Lee and Terri Catlett (1994) ‘Women Editors at the “Seven Sisters” Magazines,
1965–1985: Did They Make a Difference?’, Journalism Quarterly 71(4): 800–8.
Joseph, Ted (1982) ‘Reporters’ and Editors’ Preferences toward Reporter Decision
Making’, Journalism Quarterly 59, Summer: 219–22, 248.
Kirat, Mohammed (1998) ‘Algerian Journalists and their World’, in David H. Weaver
(ed.) The Global Journalist: News People around the World , pp. 323–48. Cresskill, NJ:
Hampton Press.
Kitzinger, Jenny (1998) ‘The Gender-Politics of News Production: Silenced Voices and
False Memories’, in Cynthia Carter, Gill Branston and Stuart Allan (eds) News,
Gender and Power , pp. 186–203. London: Routledge.
Lo, Ven-hwei (1998) ‘The New Taiwan Journalist: A Sociological Profile’, in David H.
Weaver (ed.) The Global Journalist: News People around the World , pp. 71–88.
Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Martin, Patricia Yancey and David L. Collinson (1999) ‘Gender and Sexuality in
Organizations’, in Myra Marx Ferree, Judith Lorber and Beth B. Hess (eds)
Revisioning Gender , pp. 285–310. Gender Lens Series. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
McLeod, Jack M. and Searle E. Hawley, Jr (1964) ‘Professionalization among News-
men’, Journalism Quarterly 41: 529–39.
McLeod, Jack and Ramona R. Rush (1969) ‘Professionalization of Latin American and
U.S. Journalists’, Journalism Quarterly 46(3): 583–90.
Menanteau-Horta, Dario (1967) ‘Professionalism of Journalists in Santiago de Chile’,
Journalism Quarterly 44(4): 715–23.
236 Journalism 1(2)
at UNIV OF NORTH DAKOTA on May 28, 2015 jou.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/
-
8/18/2019 Bruin 2000
21/22
Merritt, Davis “Buzz” (1998) Public Journalism and Public Life: Why Telling the News Is
Not Enough. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Merritt, Sharyne and Harriet Gross (1978) ‘Women’s Page/Lifestyle Editors: Does Sex
Make a Difference?’, Journalism Quarterly 55(3): 508–14.
Mills, Kay (1997) ‘What Difference Do Women Journalists Make?’, in Pippa Norris
(ed.) Women, Media and Politics, pp. 41–55. New York and Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Murdock, G. and P. Golding (1977) ‘Large Corporations and the Control Com-
munications Industries’, in J. Curran, M. Gurevitch and J. Woollacott (eds) Mass
Communication and Society . London: Edward Arnold.
Norris, Pippa (ed). (1997) Women, Media and Politics. New York and Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Pool, Ithiel de Sola and Irwin Schulman (1959) ‘Newsmen’s Fantasies, Audiences, and
Newswriting’, Public Opinion Quarterly 23: 145–58.Robinson, Gertrude J. and Armande Saint-Jean (1998) ‘Canadian Women Journalists:
The “Other Half” of the Equation’, in David H. Weaver (ed.) The Global Journalist:
News People around the World , pp. 351–72. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Schlesinger, Philip (1990) ‘Rethinking the Sociology of Journalism: Source Strategies
and the Limits of Media-Centrism’, in Marjorie Ferguson (ed.) Public Communica-
tion: The New Imperatives, pp. 61–83. London: Sage.
Schudson, Michael (1978) Discovering the New: A Social History of American Newspapers.
New York: Basic Books/Harper Colophon Books.
Schudson, Michael (1991) ‘The Sociology of News Production Revisited’, in James
Curran and Michael Gurevitch (eds) Mass Media and Society , pp. 141–59. Londonand New York: Edward Arnold.
Scott Whitlow, S. (1977) ‘How Male and Female Gatekeepers Respond to News Stories
of Women’, Journalism Quarterly 54(3): 573–9, 609.
Shoemaker, Pamela J. (1997) ‘A New Gatekeeping Model’, in Dan Berkowitz (ed.) Social
Meanings of News, pp. 57–71. London: Sage.
Shoemaker, Pamela J. and Stephen D. Reese (1991) Mediating the Message: Theories of
Influences on Mass Media Content. New York and London: Longman.
Sigal, Leon V. (1973) Reporters and Officials: The Organization and Politics of News-
making . Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
Sigelman, Lee (1973) ‘Reporting the News: An Organizational Analysis’, American
Journal of Sociology 79(1): 132–51.
Skidmore, Paula (1998), ‘Gender and the Agenda: News Reporting of Child Sexual
Abuse’, in Cynthia Carter, Gill Branston and Stuart Allan (eds) News, Gender and
Power , pp. 204–18. London and New York: Routledge.
Sohn, Ardyth B. (1984) ‘Goals and Achievement Orientations of Women Newspaper
Managers’, Journalism Quarterly 61 Autumn: 600–5.
Steiner, Linda (1998) ‘Newsroom Accounts of Power at Work’, in Cynthia Carter, Gill
Branston and Stuart Allan (eds) News, Gender and Power , pp. 145–59. London and
New York: Routledge.
Tracey, Michael (1978) The Production of Political Television. London: Routledge &
Kegan Paul.
Tuchman, Gaye (1978) Making News: A Study in the Construction of Reality . New York
and London: The Free Press.
De Bruin Gender, organizational and professional identities 237
at UNIV OF NORTH DAKOTA on May 28, 2015 jou.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/http://jou.sagepub.com/
-
8/18/2019 Bruin 2000
22/22
Tunstall, Jeremy (1971) Journalists at Work – Specialist Correspondents: Their News
Organizations, News Sources and Competitor-Colleagues. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Van Zoonen, Liesbet (1994) Feminist Media Studies. London: Sage.
Van Zoonen, Liesbet (1998a) ‘A Professional, Unreliable, Heroic Marionette (M/F):
Structure, Agency and Subjectivity in Contemporary Journalism’, European
Journal of Cultural Studies 1(1): 123–43.
Van Zoonen, Liesbet (1998b) ‘One of the Girls?: The Changing Gender of Journalism’,
in Cynthia Carter, Gill Branston and Stuart Allan (eds) News, Gender and Power ,
pp. 33–46. London and New York: Routledge.
Weaver, David H. (1997) ‘Women as Journalists’, in Pippa Norris (ed.) Women, Media
and Politics, pp. 21–40. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Weaver, David H. (ed.) (1998) The Global Journalist: News People around the World .
Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Weaver, David H. and G. Cleveland Wilhoit (1996) The American Journalist in the
1990s: US News People at the End of an Era . Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Whetten, David A. and Paul C. Godfrey (eds) (1998) Identity in Organizations: Building
Theory through Conversations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
White, D.M. (1950) ‘The Gatekeeper: A Case Study in the Selection of News’,
Journalism Quarterly 7(4): 383–90.
Biographical notes
Marjan de Bruin is Senior Lecturer at the Caribbean Institute of Media andCommunication (CARIMAC), University of the West Indies. She is president of the
Gender and Communication section of the International Association of Media and
Communication Research (IAMCR). Her research interests are in professional
socialization, gender, dynamics in the newsroom and quality of media coverage.
Address: CARIMAC, University of the West Indies, Mona Campus, Kingston 7,
Jamaica. [email: [email protected] and [email protected]]
238 Journalism 1(2)