Download - Bush doctrine by @JWongi
![Page 1: Bush doctrine by @JWongi](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052900/555aad73d8b42ad0538b4dd9/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Bush doctrineJUSTICE OF SELF DEFENSE
Yoojin KwonChaiwon Baek
Jaehee LeeJunhwa Lee
Ryu HansaemJooyeon LimWongi Jung
![Page 2: Bush doctrine by @JWongi](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052900/555aad73d8b42ad0538b4dd9/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
table of contentsTERMS AND DEFINITIONSHISTORY OF U.S. DIPLOMATICSLIMITATIONS OF BUSH DOCTRINEREASONS FOR BUSH DOCTRINEMEDIA RESPONSE: PROS & CONSOBAMA AND FUTURE
![Page 3: Bush doctrine by @JWongi](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052900/555aad73d8b42ad0538b4dd9/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Bush DoctrineTERMS AND DEFINITIONS
![Page 4: Bush doctrine by @JWongi](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052900/555aad73d8b42ad0538b4dd9/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
9/11 Crisis
Invasion of Afghanistan
Bush DoctrineESCALATION
breach of trustwith middle east
![Page 5: Bush doctrine by @JWongi](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052900/555aad73d8b42ad0538b4dd9/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
...the first duty of the United States remains what it always has been: to protect the American people and American interests.
The greater the threat, the greater is the risk of inaction.
To forestall or prevent such hostile acts by our adversaries, the United States will, if necessary, act preemptively in exercising our inherent right of self defense.
“”
Bush DoctrineDEFINITION
National Security Strategy of the United States, Sep 17th, 2002
![Page 6: Bush doctrine by @JWongi](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052900/555aad73d8b42ad0538b4dd9/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
![Page 7: Bush doctrine by @JWongi](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052900/555aad73d8b42ad0538b4dd9/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
preemptive strikesDEFINITION
If we wait for threats to fully materialize, we will have waited too long.
Our security will require transforming the military you will lead: a military that must be ready to strike at a moment’s notice in any dark corner of the world.
“”George W. Bush, Jun 1st, 2002 speech at West Point
![Page 8: Bush doctrine by @JWongi](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052900/555aad73d8b42ad0538b4dd9/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
unilateralismSUMMARY
... any doctrine or agenda that supports one-sided action.
a tendency of nations to conduct their foreign affairs individualistically, characterized by minimal consultation and involvement, even with their allies.
“”
Wikipedia: Unilateralism
The Free Dictionary.com
![Page 9: Bush doctrine by @JWongi](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052900/555aad73d8b42ad0538b4dd9/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
history ofU.S. DIPLOMATICS
![Page 10: Bush doctrine by @JWongi](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052900/555aad73d8b42ad0538b4dd9/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
“Why, by interweaving our destiny with that of any part of Europe, entangle our peace and prosperity in the toils of European Ambition...?”
isolationismGEORGE WASHINGTON
George Washington’s Farewell Address, 1796
![Page 11: Bush doctrine by @JWongi](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052900/555aad73d8b42ad0538b4dd9/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
monroe doctrineJAMES MONROE
“...we should consider any attempt on their part to extend their system to any portion of this hemisphere as dangerous to our peace and safety.”
7th annual State of the Union address, 1823
![Page 12: Bush doctrine by @JWongi](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052900/555aad73d8b42ad0538b4dd9/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
a big stickTHEODORE ROOSEVELT
"Chronic wrongdoing... may in America, as elsewhere, ultimately require intervention by some civilized nation,"
“walk softly, but carry a big stick.”
Roosevelt corollary to Monroe doctrine, 1905
![Page 13: Bush doctrine by @JWongi](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052900/555aad73d8b42ad0538b4dd9/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Ike’s dominoDWIGHT D. EISENHOWER
“You have a row of dominoes set up, you knock over the first one, and what will happen to the last one is a certainty that it will go over very quickly.”
Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1954 press conference
![Page 14: Bush doctrine by @JWongi](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052900/555aad73d8b42ad0538b4dd9/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
after 9.11GEORGE W. BUSH
“You are either with us or you are against us in the fight against terror.”
George W. Bush, 2001 Nov. 6th press conference
![Page 15: Bush doctrine by @JWongi](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052900/555aad73d8b42ad0538b4dd9/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
larger backyardNOT IN MY BACKYARD
![Page 16: Bush doctrine by @JWongi](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052900/555aad73d8b42ad0538b4dd9/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
limitationsOF BUSH DOCTRINE
![Page 17: Bush doctrine by @JWongi](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052900/555aad73d8b42ad0538b4dd9/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
One of threeaxis of evil
Highly dependent on export of oil
Had the first Gulf War with U.S.
about Iraq“DARK CORNER OF THE WORLD”
![Page 18: Bush doctrine by @JWongi](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052900/555aad73d8b42ad0538b4dd9/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Weapons of Mass Destruction
Human Rights Violation
500t Uranium from Nigeria
justifications
![Page 19: Bush doctrine by @JWongi](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052900/555aad73d8b42ad0538b4dd9/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
MARCH 20TH, 2003freedom of IraqAmerica carried out preemptive strike against Iraqwithout UN’s permission
MAY 1ST, 2003end of the war
Allied forces bombed Iraq, overthrew the dictatorship of Saddam Hussain
![Page 20: Bush doctrine by @JWongi](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052900/555aad73d8b42ad0538b4dd9/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
breach of integrity
Dr. David A. Kay
“... Iraq did not have weapons of mass destruction.”
head of the Iraq Survey Weapons inspector
![Page 21: Bush doctrine by @JWongi](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052900/555aad73d8b42ad0538b4dd9/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
important questions
1. Is it possible to check possession of WMD?
2. Then, did Iraq have WMD?
3. Can this Doctrine resolve and prevent terrorism?
CAN BUSH DOCTRINE BE JUSTIFIED?
![Page 22: Bush doctrine by @JWongi](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052900/555aad73d8b42ad0538b4dd9/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
1. Is it possible to check possession of WMD?
![Page 23: Bush doctrine by @JWongi](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052900/555aad73d8b42ad0538b4dd9/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
2. Then, did Iraq have WMD?
![Page 24: Bush doctrine by @JWongi](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052900/555aad73d8b42ad0538b4dd9/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
3. Can this doctrine resolve and prevent terrorism?
![Page 25: Bush doctrine by @JWongi](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052900/555aad73d8b42ad0538b4dd9/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
then, why?REASONS FOR BUSH DOCTRINE
![Page 26: Bush doctrine by @JWongi](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052900/555aad73d8b42ad0538b4dd9/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
To protect U.S. from terrorists
more influence and benefits
![Page 27: Bush doctrine by @JWongi](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052900/555aad73d8b42ad0538b4dd9/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
to protect AmericaTHE VANTAGE POINT
Given the magnitude of threat, the only acceptable strategy is one that eliminates the possibility that Iraq will be able to use weapons of mass destruction… removing Saddam Hussein and his regime for power. That needs to become the aim of U.S. foreign policy.“
”Jan 26th, 1998 letter to President Clinton,
![Page 28: Bush doctrine by @JWongi](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052900/555aad73d8b42ad0538b4dd9/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
to protect America9/11 TERROR
- “The U.S. will not distinguish terrorists and nations that harbor terrorists.”
- Al Qaeda attacked WTC and Pentagon on 9/11, 2001.
![Page 29: Bush doctrine by @JWongi](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052900/555aad73d8b42ad0538b4dd9/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
to protect AmericaFLAW OF LOGIC
- Why not attack other axis of evil?
- According to U.N. investigation, there was no WMD in Iraq.
![Page 30: Bush doctrine by @JWongi](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052900/555aad73d8b42ad0538b4dd9/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
richer, strongerREVIVING PAX AMERICANA
to gain control of oil
to interfere inforeign states
to get a ticketto bypass U.N.
![Page 31: Bush doctrine by @JWongi](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052900/555aad73d8b42ad0538b4dd9/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
richer, strongerSECURING OIL RESOURCES
- Saddam Hussein had wanted to control the Straits of Hormuz and so control Middle East oil shipments.
- “Had Saddam been able to do that it would have been devastating to the west.”
Alan Greenspan, a long time head of the U.S. Central Bank
![Page 32: Bush doctrine by @JWongi](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052900/555aad73d8b42ad0538b4dd9/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
richer, strongerINTERFERING IN FOREIGN AFFAIRS
- Establishing precedents for future U.S. intervention
- Another Afghanistan war, another Iraqi war
![Page 33: Bush doctrine by @JWongi](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052900/555aad73d8b42ad0538b4dd9/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
richer, strongerNO UN, ONLY US!
- Establishing precedents for bypassing U.N.
- The U.S. did not ask the U.N. security council’s approval in implementing Bush doctrine and using preemptive strikes
![Page 34: Bush doctrine by @JWongi](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052900/555aad73d8b42ad0538b4dd9/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34
consequencesBUSH DOCTRINE:
![Page 35: Bush doctrine by @JWongi](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052900/555aad73d8b42ad0538b4dd9/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
35
failureAL-QUEDA DILEMMA
- Osama Bin Laden escapes
- Eventually captured and executed more than 10 years later
- Terrorist groups still flourish
![Page 36: Bush doctrine by @JWongi](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052900/555aad73d8b42ad0538b4dd9/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
36
TALIBAN AND AFGHANISTAN
- The U.S. liberated Afghan from Taliban
- The new government was corrupted
- Drug lords, criminals everywhere
- Reconstruction never happened,
Taliban resurging
failure
![Page 37: Bush doctrine by @JWongi](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052900/555aad73d8b42ad0538b4dd9/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
37
PAKISTANfailure
- $10 billion gov investment went elsewhere
- Anti-Americanism due to drone attacks
- Tribal areas in the hands of Pakistani
version of Taliban
![Page 38: Bush doctrine by @JWongi](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052900/555aad73d8b42ad0538b4dd9/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
38
- Iraqi and American war victims
- No WMD, no reconstruction
Resistance due to Anti-Americanism -
Greater nuclear threat to the U.S. -
IRAQ AND IRANfailure
![Page 39: Bush doctrine by @JWongi](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052900/555aad73d8b42ad0538b4dd9/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
39
Bush doctrineMEDIA RESPONSE
![Page 40: Bush doctrine by @JWongi](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052900/555aad73d8b42ad0538b4dd9/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
“...overly aggressive stance Mr. Bush has outlined”
“created a fortress America that inspires the enmity rather than the envy of the world"
The New York Times
![Page 41: Bush doctrine by @JWongi](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052900/555aad73d8b42ad0538b4dd9/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
“...an unwillingness to be constrained by international organizations”
“failed... primarily because of fuzzy thinking and poor execution…”
The Washington Post
![Page 42: Bush doctrine by @JWongi](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052900/555aad73d8b42ad0538b4dd9/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
"poses a fundamental challenge to the world body... and may lead to a global freedom"
Al Jazeera
![Page 43: Bush doctrine by @JWongi](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052900/555aad73d8b42ad0538b4dd9/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Bush DoctrineOBAMA AND FUTURE
![Page 44: Bush doctrine by @JWongi](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052900/555aad73d8b42ad0538b4dd9/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
44
...does not require the U.S. to have clear evidence that a specific attack on the U.S. persons and interests will take place in the immediate future...“ ”A memo from Obama National Security Apparatus
Bush DoctrineWILL IT CONTINUE?
![Page 45: Bush doctrine by @JWongi](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052900/555aad73d8b42ad0538b4dd9/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
aftermathJUSTIFICATION OF DRONES
![Page 46: Bush doctrine by @JWongi](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052900/555aad73d8b42ad0538b4dd9/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
MORE PREEMPTIVE STRIKESdrone attacks
![Page 47: Bush doctrine by @JWongi](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052900/555aad73d8b42ad0538b4dd9/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)