Download - CAHSEE Coverage
-
7/22/2019 CAHSEE Coverage
1/28
CAHSEE News Coverage 1
Running head: NEWS COVERAGE OF HIGH STAKES TESTING
What Does the News Write About High Stakes Testing?: Finding Patterns of Education
Coverage in the California High School Exit Exam Controversy
T. Russell Hanes
Portland State University
T. Russell Hanes was a graduate student at the Department of Communication, Portland State
University. He is now studying at Lewis and Clark College. This research was conducted for hismasters thesis. He would like to acknowledge David Ritchie, Cynthia Coleman, Karen
Marrongelle, Brian Greer, and Erin Hanes for their comments and advice, and Kasi Fuller for herencouragement.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to T. Russell Hanes, 3537 SEMain St., Portland, OR 97214. Email: [email protected]. Phone: 503-525-5772
-
7/22/2019 CAHSEE Coverage
2/28
CAHSEE News Coverage 2
Abstract
The controversy over Californias exit exam is a useful case study for understanding how news
media may cover high stakes testing issues. This study extensively reviews literature on news
coverage of other education issues: an anti-evolution bill, bilingual education, vouchers, racial
achievement gaps, and school board politics. Drawing upon two theories of mass media effects,
agenda setting and framing, this study analyzes California coverage from April 1999 to March
2006 to determine what images newspapers conveyed to readers. The results indicate that readers
received images of failing schools in crisis and none of teaching/learning, reinforcing ambivalent
attitudes toward public education.
-
7/22/2019 CAHSEE Coverage
3/28
CAHSEE News Coverage 3
Introduction
High stakes testing is a controversial reform, and the student outcomes on these tests
have more potential to shape attitudes toward public education than any other issue today. Public
reactions to these outcomes are likely mediated by the particular biases of news coverage.
Californias recent controversy over the California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) is a
useful case study for investigating the role news media play; what happened in California may be
a bellwether for other such programs across the country. An exit exama test required for high
school graduationis becoming increasingly common: at least 27 states have or will soon
require exit exams (Johnson, Thurlow, Cosio, & Bremer, 2005). These exit exams can cover
basic or advanced skills; for example, the CAHSEE is a test combining basic reading
comprehension with advanced mathematical skills, including algebra.
California has a long history of seesawing battles over reform, especially mathematics-
related reforms (Becker & Jacob, 2000; Wilson, 2003), and the CAHSEE adds another chapter to
this saga. The first CAHSEE was administered in March 2001, with some experts involved in the
development concerned that the mathematics section was not rigorous enough (Sandham, 2000).
However, only one quarter of Latino/a and African American students passed the test on this first
trial (Manzo, 2001). Special education students were required to pass the CAHSEE, against
which a federal judge issued an injunction in 2002 (Jacobson, 2005). Because of concerns for
minorities, ESL students, and special education students, the State Board of Education (SBE)
delayed the CAHSEE as a graduation requirement until the Class of 2006 (Sack, 2003). This
maneuver allowed the state time to appeal the federal injunction, and eventually, the Ninth
Circuit Court of Appeals found in the states favor and lifted the injunction (Galley, 2004).
Dissatisfied state legislators proposed various bills addressing shortcomings of the test or
-
7/22/2019 CAHSEE Coverage
4/28
CAHSEE News Coverage 4
offering alternative assessments, but Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed almost every one
of them (Coleman, 2005). California therefore denied 42,000 students high school diplomas this
June because of their failure on the CAHSEE (Dang, 2006).
Research Questions
These student outcomes on the CAHSEE might positively or negatively affect opinions
about California public education. Widespread failure on exit exams might indicate to
Californians that they have either a rigorous education system with high standards or a weak
system that hurts students. No model exists for predicting such public reactions, as [p]olicies
designed to reform education come by the cartload, but assessments of their impact on the
publics confidence in education are rarely made (Loveless, 1997, p. 155). In the abstract,
high stakes testing seems popular. A September 2005 Phi Delta Kappa / Gallup national poll
showed equivocal support: a majority (57%) supported current levels of testingbut a majority
(68%) also believed one test was not a fair measure (Rose & Gallup, 2005). Given this equivocal
attitude, public reactions to the CAHSEE are quite susceptible to media effects (Price, 1992).
Agenda setting and framing are two theories for understanding possible media effects.
This section and the next review content analyses of education coverage, which have
begun appearing only within the last decade. Since only a few are studies of U.S. education
coverage, the observations from non-U.S. coverage are drawn upon to formulate research
questions and hypotheses about CAHSEE coverage. (The context of coverage [location and
education issue] is noted for each analysis.) When generalizing the characteristics of news
coverage and the media effects this might have on public opinions, it is important to avoid the
state-of-consciousness fallacy; there is not one unitary public or a single, simple public opinion
(Milburn, 1991, p. 14).
-
7/22/2019 CAHSEE Coverage
5/28
CAHSEE News Coverage 5
Agenda Setting
Agenda setting theory posits that repetition of an issue makes it more salient, that is,
repetition helps audiences more readily recall the issue. In other words, the news agendasets the
public agendas through repetition (McCombs & Shaw, 1972). Education issues do not rank high
on the news agenda. Even coverage of children infrequently mentions education: only 34% of
articles about youths in the major California newspapers were about K-12 school or college
(McManus & Dorfman, 2001). However, as researchers have noted (Baker, 1994; Ogle &
Dobbs, 1998), tests receive a more generous (though still modest) amount of news coverage.
Bracey (1994) argued that U.S. coverage ignores rising test scoresonly falling scores
make the news agenda. Other researchers have also found that when news coverage does
mention education, it is usually critical. Maeroff (2000) noted that news coverage of violence in
U.S. public schools increased even as actual incidents decreased. Pride (1995, 2002) found that
critical events (or crises), rather than performance trends, dominated Tennessee coverage of
public schools. These repetitive, critical messages could convince people that the education
system is indeed failing. On a differing note, Doyle (1998) believed that K-12 education
coverage was unduly positive because schools hid poor results. Chance (1993) found that
coverage of California higher education was positive, but higher education may have an aura
effect that exempts it from the worst criticism (p. 12). This leads to the first research question.
Research Question 1: Did the CAHSEE make the news agenda only in response to
critical events?
Framing
Framing is a theory describing how news coverage can subtly shape audience perceptions
of a news event. At its simplest level, framing theory posits that catchphrases and ideas within an
-
7/22/2019 CAHSEE Coverage
6/28
CAHSEE News Coverage 6
article contextualize an event for a reader by cueing the reader to a whole set of assumptions,
beliefs, cultural myths, or ideologies external to the event (Goffman, 1974). For example, a news
article about gay marriage might contextualize it with references to the ideology of equal rights
or references to religious beliefs. These extra-textual issues are known aspackages, and the
central idea of each is aframe. A frame is therefore like a lens to help the reader see the
significance of a story, the broader socio-political issue beyond the specific news event (Gamson
& Modigliani, 1989). Of course, the readers might reject these packages as irrelevant, but by
narrowing the context given to the reader to make sense of a story, framing entails a sort of
ideological massaging of information (Coleman, 1996, p. 181). By the exclusion of alternate
frames, a reporter implies these are not correct ways to interpret the story; on the other hand, a
reporter could instead choose give the reader multiple frames within a single article and treat the
event as multidimensional.
Framing can have powerful effects on public opinions. Kinder and Sanders (1990) found
that news frames had large effects on public opinions about affirmative action. The effectiveness
of a frame derives from its cultural resonance with pre-existing attitudes, shaping rather than
dictating attitudes by: (1) emphasizing what is important about an issue, (2) portraying some
groups as causes of a problem and other groups as having solutions to it, (3) limiting the
language used to describe an issue, and (4) appealing to certain cultural values (Hertog &
McLeod, 2001). In news coverage of education issues, the most common cultural values
appealed to in a story may not be related to the process of teaching and learning. For example,
Farkas (1997) noted that curriculum is ignored in U.S. coverage (as cited in Wadsworth, 1998).
Appeals to other non-pedagogical, non-curricular values might have appeared in CAHSEE
coverage.
-
7/22/2019 CAHSEE Coverage
7/28
CAHSEE News Coverage 7
Research Question 2: How did news coverage frame the CAHSEE?
Source quotations are an essential part of framing a story. The open question for media
researchers is who controls whom: one group of media researchers argues that a journalist picks
sources to fit in the journalists framing (e.g. Ryan, 2001), while a second group of researchers
avers that the actors involved with an issue (that is, the sources) manipulate the news framing of
an issue by giving their ready-made frames to the journalists (e.g. Haffey, 2002). For example, in
her content analysis of an anti-evolution controversy in Tennessee schools, McCune (2003)
found that one side framed teaching evolution as a violation of a teachers First Amendment
rights while the other side framed evolution as necessary knowledge for biotech workers, with
each side vying to have its framing picked up by the news media. Similarly, Jeffs (1999)
observed that British news coverage of education tended toward repackaged handouts and
disguised advertising (p. 167). It is difficult to determine whether sources frame the issue for
journalists or journalists select sources based on their framings because a discussion of the
specific processes via which education news is structured remains minimal (Warmington &
Murphy, 2004, p. 287), leading to the third research question.
Research Question 3: Were sources or journalists most responsible for framing CAHSEE
coverage?
Hypotheses
The content analyses of specific education coverage suggest specific hypotheses that can
be drawn forResearch Questions 2 and 3. Four frames appeared repeatedly in many different
contexts (in Australian, British, Canadian, and U.S. coverage of various education issues):
leadership, standards, utility, and equity. Of course, additional frames appeared in coverage
specific to each issue, but these four frames commonly appeared across nearly every issue. It is
-
7/22/2019 CAHSEE Coverage
8/28
CAHSEE News Coverage 8
hypothesized that these four frames as developed below, and the patterns of source quotations
described for each frame, appeared in CAHSEE coverage.
Leadership. In the leadership frame, reporters examine what political leaders are or
should do about problems facing the education system. Education events are contextualized as
political or policy issues. As Levin (2004) editorialized about Canadian coverage: In education,
the connection to public policy is particularly strong because of a tendency to believe that all
social problems can be corrected through the schools (p. 275). For this frame, political leaders
(both government and opposition), activists, and bureaucrats are frequently quoted as sources.
Researchers found two tendencies in articles using the leadership frame.
First, news coverage focused on the implementation side of leadership, rather than on the
creation of policy. Gerstl-Pepin (2002) noted that coverage of education policies during the 2000
U.S. presidential election hid an assumption that political will was more relevant than good
policies. Second, leadership-framed coverage focused on the system and its efficiency, rather
than individual schools or students, teachers, or learning; for example, Pride (1995, 2002) noted
that a repeated news criticism of the Nashville, Tennessee public schools was the inefficiency of
the system. This kind of news coverage often proposed centralization as an effective response to
systemic problems: Blackmore and Thorpe (2003) described the Australian presss favoritism for
upward (line management) accountability of schools to the central government (p. 582).
Standards. Most content analysts of education coverage found that events were framed
through a traditionalist, back-to-basics lens. The central idea of this frame is that traditional
standards of education need to be re-instated to restore the legitimacy of schooling. This
traditionalism was frequently combined with anti-progressivism, and Wallace (1993) noted the
commonly reported British cultural myth that progressive education was to blame for mediocre
-
7/22/2019 CAHSEE Coverage
9/28
CAHSEE News Coverage 9
standards (p. 327). Researchers have discovered two interesting patterns in news coverage using
the standards frame.
First, news coverage using the standards frame tended to welcome the mechanism of
standardized testing as a way to re-instate standards. Thomas (2003) noted that Australian
editorials consistently linked external examinations to improved literacy and numeracy for
students. On the other hand, Warmington and Murphy (2004) found the British press was so
skeptical of rising test scores that better scores were blamed on newer and supposedly easier
exam subjects. High stakes testing may be necessary to enforce standards, but journalists seem to
believe that testing is a zero-sum gamerising scores are not a sign of improvementwhich
may explain why only falling scores appear on the news agenda. Second, standards-framed
coverage seemed conducive to pro-parent, anti-teacher attitudes. Thomas (1999, 2002, 2003)
found that Australian coverage denigrated teachers expertise, ignoring them as sources, while
promoting typical parents visions of education as common-sense; Pettigrew (1997) noted the
same pattern in British coverage. Galindos (2004) study of California coverage of bilingual
education certainly showed strong pro-traditionalism, anti-progressivism in U.S. coverage. These
two patterns of pro-test and pro-parent might have appeared in CAHSEE coverage.
Utility. Education events can be framed as economic issues. The argument is that students
need an education to get good jobs or that the economy needs the education system to produce
well-trained workers. As such, this is the one frame, of the four common frames in this section,
to suggest what purpose education might serve. This argument has deep historical roots in the
U.S., from the common-schools movement in the 1830s (Rury, 2005). Appearing recently,
McCune (2003) found this utility frame in news coverage of an anti-evolution bill in Tennessee:
-
7/22/2019 CAHSEE Coverage
10/28
CAHSEE News Coverage 10
the bill would hurt the states development efforts by making it look foolish (p. 15); and it
would make students ill-prepared for higher education and high-tech jobs (p. 22).
Researchers noted two tendencies in coverage using the utility frame. First, science and
mathematics were in particular portrayed as key purposes of education; that is, journalists
suggested public education existed to provide scientific progress. Lingard and Rawolle (2004)
found that the Australian government increased funding to local schoolsbut only as part of a
science policy initiativeand the news media touted the knowledge economy as a rationale for
this and other education policies. Second, business leaders were cited as education experts in
utility-framed coverage. Berliner and Biddle (1995) found that U.S. business leaders were quoted
frequently and warmly, especially about the need for more high-tech workers.
Equity. Coverage using the equity frame suggested that schools or tests might be biased
against minorities, ESL students, or low socio-economic status children. As such, this is the only
frame in opposition to high stakes testing. Clark (2003) noted that racial bias and socio-economic
differences were competing explanations for inequality in student opportunities and outcomes in
Michigan coverage of school vouchers. Other researchers found one or the other explanation
favored in specific coverages. For example, in his Mobile, Alabama sample, Pride (1999) found
that 30% of education stories mentioned race, while only 18% of crime stories did. Thompson
(2002) found that school board politics in Dallas, Texas were racialized in both mainstream and
minority newspapers. On the other hand, Galindo (2004) found strong rhetoric for the socio-
economic explanation of inequalities. In California news coverage of bilingual education, some
reporters averred that bilingual programs doomed students to a linguistic ghetto and second-
class status (p. 242).
-
7/22/2019 CAHSEE Coverage
11/28
CAHSEE News Coverage 11
Even in equity-framed coverage, minority sources may be ignored. Fleming-Rife and
Proffitt (2004) characterized news coverage ofBrown v. Board of Educationby the absence or
misrepresentation of minority voices (p. 244)of course, this was 1950s coverage. Recently,
however, the techniques used to suppress minority viewpoints have become more sophisticated.
Haniford (2003) found that Ann Arbor, Michigan coverage of the student achievement gap was
characterized by the use of racially loaded language by both sides, which had the upshot of
marginalizing minorities viewpoints.
Method
Given the relative novelty of content analysis of education coverage, no methods have
emerged as preferred. Some researchers have used qualitative techniques (Thomas, 1999, 2002,
2003), while others have used quantitative techniques (Pride, 1995, 1999, 2000, 2002). In his
seminal text of content analysis, Krippendorff (2004) noted that with quantitative techniques, the
ability to process large volumes of text in content analysis is paid for by the explicitness of the
methods procedures (p. 42). Even though quantitative methods are not subtle or sensitive,
given the volume of texts in California coverage, quantitative methods are sensible for coding
the frames and sources hypothesized a priori.
Sample
This study analyzed coverage from five of the six largest newspapers in California: the
Los Angeles Times(with an approximate weekday circulation of 800,000), the San Francisco
Chronicle(500,000), the San Diego Union-Tribune(400,000), the Sacramento Bee(300,000),
and the San Jose Mercury-News(250,000). (The Orange County Register, with a 300,000-
weekday circulation, was unavailable due to publisher restrictions.) Newspapers were selected as
the exclusive medium for study because they have provided the best coverage in past education
-
7/22/2019 CAHSEE Coverage
12/28
CAHSEE News Coverage 12
controversies (Watson, 1998). Furthermore, newspapers are the most important news media,
because they help shape the scope of understanding and subsequent discussions (Galindo,
2004, p. 229). Small newspapers were excluded from study for this same follow-the-leader
reason.
In this study, whole news articles were the units of analysis. The population of articles
from these five sources was downloaded from Lexis-Nexis for the 84 month period from 1 April
1999 (when Governor Gray Davis signed the law calling for the creation of the CAHSEE) to 31
March 2006 (ten days past the last test date for the class of 2006), using the search term exit
exam within the Headline, Lead Paragraph, and Terms option and high school and math!
within the Full Text option. The initial search generated a population of 231 articles, of which
110 were discarded either because they were not about the CAHSEE or because they were not
feature news articles. As Van Dijk (1991) noted, editorials and feature new articles have different
structures; feature news articles are the primary users of framing. Opinion-editorials, letters-to-
the-editor, and news summaries were therefore ignored. This left a remaining sample of 121
feature news articles that were coded.
Coding
Each article was numbered by its retrieval order and then coded for basic publication data
(e.g. author(s) [which could be Staff or Newswire], newspaper, date of publication, length in
words, and initial placement in the newspaper by section). Each article was coded for frames.
Frames were coded in order of appearance, but a repetition of a frame was coded only the first
time. The four hypothesized framesleadership, standards, utility, and equitywere coded as
present or not present. The direct quotations used were coded by sourcestudents, teachers,
parents, local administrators, state bureaucrats, education researchers, interest groups, business
-
7/22/2019 CAHSEE Coverage
13/28
CAHSEE News Coverage 13
people, politiciansas present or not presentfor each frame. Indirect quotations, un-attributed
quotations, or quotations that did not evoke one of the four frames were not coded.
Two coders were used to speed the coding process. Both coders used the same coding
sheet and scheme, but the coders worked independently. Intercoder reliability was measured
using Krippendorffs alpha (!). To establish reliability data at the .05 significance level, a
minimum sample size of 52 articles needs to be coded by both coders (Krippendorff, 2004, p.
240). These articles were chosen randomly and mixed into each coders sample. An initial trial
revealed that the coding scheme was robust for the standards, utility, and equity frames.
Intercoder reliability had a Krippendorffs != .90. The coding scheme for leadership frame was
reworked to increase its reliability, bringing it up to a Krippendorffs != .80.
Results
Research Question 1
The results indicate that at only a few times during the seven-year period did the
CAHSEE appear in the news agenda. The amount of coverage is demonstrated by the summed
word counts (across all the articles published per quarter). The prominence of this coverage is
demonstrated by the number of section A articles (across all coverage per quarter), as these
articles are more prominent than those relegated to the local or other interior sections.
As shown by Figure 1, major spikes in both the word count and placement of articles
occurred in autumn (October-December) 2002, summer (July-September) 2005, and winter
(January-March) 2006. At these periods of time, the CAHSEE was an important item on the
news agenda. These spikes correspond to critical events for to the CAHSEE. In the autumn of
2002, when the State Board of Education (SBE) released the first test results, seven section A
articles were published, and a total of 9,947 words were written about the CAHSEE. In the
-
7/22/2019 CAHSEE Coverage
14/28
CAHSEE News Coverage 14
summer of 2005, when the first class required to pass the test was about to enter school, another
seven section A articles were published, and 15,867 words were published in total. Coverage
spiked again in the winter of 2006, when the class of 2006 headed to the last test date before
graduation: eleven section A articles and 30,986 words were published about the test.
Figure 1: Word counts and articles
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Words(in
thousands)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Articles
Summed word counts
Section A articles
Note. Both results were calculated by summing quarterly totals (winter: January-March; spring: April-June; summer:
July-September; and autumn: October-December) across newspapers.
There were three smaller spikes of coverage: spring (April-June) 2001, when the first
lawsuit was filed against the CAHSEE; winter (January-March) 2002, when a federal judge
issued an injunction against testing; and summer (July-September) 2003, when the SBE delayed
the CAHSEE as a graduation requirement. During each of these periods, four section A articles
but less than 5,000 words of coverage were published. These periods represent major turning
points in CAHSEE policy but did not receive the same level of attention as student outcomes.
-
7/22/2019 CAHSEE Coverage
15/28
CAHSEE News Coverage 15
Research Question 2
Of the whole sample, 113 articles (93%) used at least one frame. Two-frame, three-
frame, and four-frame combinations appeared in 83 articles (69%). The results show that the
leadership frame was the dominant way to contextualize the CAHSEE, appearing in 92 articles
(76%). It was the most common initial frame, appearing first in 56 articles (46%), and of the 30
articles using only one frame, more than half (53%) used only the leadership frame. Leadership
was also the most frequently combined frame. Of all 47 articles using two-frame combinations,
the most frequent hybrids were leadership-equity (47%) and leadership-standards (30%). Of all
21 articles using three-frame combinations, the most common hybrid was leadership-standards-
equity (62%).
Equity was the second-most common frame, appearing in 65 articles (54%) and as the
initial frame in 27 articles (22%). Standards appeared in 55 articles (45%) and was more
frequently used as a supporting frame, appearing as the initial frame in only 19 articles (16%).
Standards usually supported the leadership frame: in 46 of its 55 appearances (84%), the article
also used the leadership frame. Utility appeared in 35 articles (29%), usually as a supporting
frame, appearing initially in only 11 articles (9%). No alternate frames appeared in coverage.
Table 1 shows how framing differed from newspaper to newspaper. The mean frames per
article varies widely, from theLos Angeles Timeshigh of 3.2 to the San Diego Union-Tribune
low of 1.6. With a few exceptions, frames were used with similar frequencies across newspapers.
(The San Jose Mercury-News, with a sample of only four articles, is misleading.) The few
exceptions include: first, the San Francisco Chronicleused the utility frame in one-fifth (19%)
of its coverage, somewhat below the average, while theLos Angeles Timesreversed the ratio and
used the utility frame in four-fifths (78%) of its coverage; and second, the use of the equity frame
-
7/22/2019 CAHSEE Coverage
16/28
CAHSEE News Coverage 16
varied widely from a low of 25% in the San Jose Mercury-Newsto a notable high of 100% for
theLos Angeles Times.
Table 1: Frame Usage by NewspaperFrame Usage by Newspaper
Articles using frame
Framesa
Leader.b
Standardsc
Utilityc
Equityc
Los Angeles Times 3.2 89% 56% 78% 100%
San Francisco Chronicle 2.3 81% 47% 19% 78%
San Diego Union-Tribune 1.6 66% 38% 24% 28%
Sacramento Bee 2.0 79% 43% 28% 47%
San Jose Mercury-News 2.3 50% 100% 50% 25%Averages for whole sample 2.1 76% 45% 29% 54%
aMean number of frames per article. bLeadership frame coding has a reliability of Krippendorffs != .80, with
significance at the .05 level. cStandards, utility, and equity frame codings each have Krippendorffs != .90, withsignificance at the .05 level.
Research Question 3
The results in Table 2 show a skew in sources used. Of the total quotations used, state
bureaucrats came in first (25%), followed by interest groups (21%), local administrators (16%),
and politicians (10%). Teachers, parents, and business people were tied in last (4%).
Sources were used with differing rates for each frame. State bureaucrats were the sources
for 41% of standards frame quotations and 32% of utility frame quotations, but for only 4% of
equity frame quotations. Local administrators show a similar skew, used for 26% of leadership
frame quotations but only 6% of equity frame quotations. Interest groups, including lawyers who
were suing California over the unfairness of the exit exam (such as Disability Rights Advocates),
were the sources for 43% of equity frame quotations. Other results were unexpected. Students
were used as 15% of the sources quoted for the utility frame and as 15% for the equity frame.
-
7/22/2019 CAHSEE Coverage
17/28
CAHSEE News Coverage 17
Parents were used as 0% of the sources quoted for the standards frame. Business people were
used as sources for only 6% of utility frame quotations.
Table 2: Percentage of Articles Using Sources for Each FramePercentage of Articles Using Sources for Each Frame
Percent of total
quotations (n= 181)
Sources used for each frame
Source Leader. Standards Utility Equity
State bureaucrats 25% 24% 41% 32% 4%
Interest groups 21% 15% 9% 18% 43%
Local administrators 16% 26% 17% 12% 6%
Politicians 10% 19% 11% 0% 9%
Education researchers 8% 11% 4% 9% 9%Students 8% 0% 4% 15% 15%
Business leaders 4% 2% 9% 6% 0%
Parents 4% 2% 0% 6% 9%
Teachers 4% 2% 4% 3% 6%
Notes. Not every frame in an article used a source quotation. Not every source quotation was coded, since it was not
necessarily a framing device. Each column would sum to 100% but for rounding.
Discussion
Many researchers have found that parents have paradoxical attitudes toward public
education: they believe their own childs school is excellent, but also believe the system is in
disrepair (Berliner & Biddle, 1995; Hochschild & Scott, 1998; Kaplan, 1992; Wallace, 1993).
Loveless (1997) explained one possible cause of parents conflicted opinions:
Those who favorably regard their local schools detect an academic emphasis that they
find attractive. Educational maladies that the public detects, on the other hand, aregeneral rather than specific, disconnected from teaching and learning, and blamed on
schools in the aggregate rather than on any school in particular. (p. 154)
The results of this study shed light on whether news coverage is partially responsible for
perpetuating this image of systemic failure. If only failures capture the news agenda, and if
-
7/22/2019 CAHSEE Coverage
18/28
CAHSEE News Coverage 18
frames create the perception that these failures are typical, then coverage could have seriously
negative effects on public opinions.
Agenda Setting
The results in Figure 1 show quite clearly that the CAHSEE only appeared the news
agenda for limited periods of time because of specific critical events. As Price (1992) noted, a
focus on specific events may decrease engagement by turning readers from actors to spectators.
Despite several crises, the CAHSEE did not make the top of the news agenda for education. A
quick Lexis-Nexis search of the same newspapers for the same seven-year period (Table 3)
shows that, compared to other education-related issues, the CAHSEE garnered only modest
coverage.
Table 3: Newspaper Coverage of High School Issues
Newspaper Coverage of High School Issues
Issuea
Articlesb
Teacher pay 6
Class size 64
Discipline 79
Exit exam & math! 231c
Violence 380
Funding 576
Drugs 650
Money 865
aSearch included high school and the issue term(s) in the Headline, Lead Paragraph, or Terms option.
bIncludes
feature news articles, news summaries, opinion-editorials, and letters-to-the-editor in the same five sample
newspapers from 1 April 1999 to 31 March 2006.c
The population of the search done for this study, not the samplecoded.
Although not as under-covered as teacher pay or class size, the CAHSEE received much
less coverage than violence, drugs, or money. Reviewing trends of opinion about public schools,
Hochschild and Scott (1998) argue that [t]hree issues dominate throughout the 30 years in
-
7/22/2019 CAHSEE Coverage
19/28
CAHSEE News Coverage 19
which this question [about criticisms of public schools] has been asked [of Americans]drugs,
discipline, and money (p. 82). This appeared to hold true for the CAHSEE. Even such an
important reform ranked below drugs and violence in the news agenda for education. The focus
on drugs and violence would bolster a belief in systemic school breakdown.
Framing
The hypotheses section developed four frames, which adequately described CAHSEE
coverage. These four frames provide a solid framework to begin the content analysis of news
coverage of any education issue. The strength of the a priori scheme reveals that cultural myths
are an important cause of framing. However, the framing in CAHSEE coverage did differ in
some key ways from the framings of coverage of other education issues described in the
background sections. It seems plausible that the sources close to the CAHSEE were responsible
for re-shaping these cultural myths and that the journalists followed their framings, but without
detailed interviews of journalists this is merely speculative.
Leadership. The leadership frame in CAHSEE coverage was similar to the hypothesized
model. CASHEE coverage showed a focus on policy implementationdetails about money and
other resources, and the time lag in preparing studentsrather than on evaluating whether the
exit exam was good policy. There was also focus on the system and its efficiency, such that
failing students were referred to by the term achievement gap. This was a way for journalists
to avoid the equity frame. There was heavy emphasis on politics and defending the test against
lawsuits because the CAHSEE was the cornerstone of school accountability. Politicians were
often quoted as sources in the leadership frame, though far less frequently than the bureaucrats.
The leadership frame was a default way to contextualize the CAHSEE; as reporters began to
move away from government sources, the leadership frame was less relevant.
-
7/22/2019 CAHSEE Coverage
20/28
CAHSEE News Coverage 20
Standards. The standards frame in CAHSEE coverage differed in surprising ways from
the hypothesized model. For example, the back to basics and return to tradition catchphrases
never appeared in CAHSEE coverage; instead, the language of skills was preferred. There was
no real attack against progressive teaching methods, and only a mild attack against teachers.
Perhaps the history of politics of public education in California, with many past controversies,
has left Californians weary of the progressive-vs.-traditionalist education fight. In its place, the
only notable debate was over whether alternatives to the test should be considered, whether a
one-size-fits-all test was an inappropriate measure, as interest groups such as lawyers said. Here,
CAHSEE coverage did follow the pattern of other education coverage: it was assumed that
alternative measures would dilute the diploma. As expected, teachers were not quoted, but
unexpectedly, parents were not either. Generally, although standards-framed CAHSEE coverage
was pro-test, it was much less fervently so than hypothesized. Even more surprising, the
standards frame was not nearly as common as anticipated. Rather, it served as a supporting frame
for the leadership frame.
Utility. The utility frame in CAHSEE coverage differed in perhaps the most surprising
ways from hypothesized predictions. First, business people were virtually ignored, providing
only 6% of utility frame quotations, while studentsespecially poor studentsprovided 15% of
utility frame quotations. Second, the argument that the economy needed schools to produce
skilled workers was never raised. Instead, reporters argued that students needed skills to survive
in the high-tech economy. Skills served as the rhetorical link between the standards and utility
frames: basic skills (standards) elided into high-tech skills (utility). The focus was on students
economic interests, thus metaphors of education as a ticket and students without education as
second-class. Only one article explained any practical use for algebra at all (its necessity in
-
7/22/2019 CAHSEE Coverage
21/28
CAHSEE News Coverage 21
plumbing or wiring a building). The clear but unstated economic utility implied by CAHSEE
coverage was that algebra was necessary for acceptance at college.
Equity. The equity frame appeared far more frequently in CAHSEE coverage than
expected. This was the second-most important frame, by total use and initial use. The equity
frame was most frequently elaborated as a full argument. Many of the articles that used the
equity frame quoted lawyers or other interest groups metaphor of a two-tier public education
system. A few articles referred to these students as forgotten and said that the denial of diplomas
was an insult or even a slap in the face. Although the equity frame frequently mentioned the race
of failing students, the focus was purely socio-economic. A key catchphrase used was
opportunity to learn: students needed to be taught the material on the test (echoing back to
standards). Unlike other education coverage described in the background sections, minorities
were not kept voiceless in CAHSEE coverage, since poor students were quoted frequently
(although usually in the context of the utility frame); at worst, lawyers spoke for them.
Conclusions
The overall impression from CAHSEE coverage was a picture of schools failing students
(equity), of resource shortages and legal controversies (leadership), and of low academic rigor
(standards). Publics received no images of the act of teaching/learning itself. Articles ignored
what was actually happening inside classrooms and sidestepped whether standardized testing
was purposeful. This is a clear example of how the inclusion of multiple frames need not be
multiperspectival (Treyens, 1997). As Galindo (2004) noted in his analysis of California news
coverage of the bilingual education debate, no one ever thought to ask, What does the nation
value in a public education? (p. 240). The primary concern for education researchers is why
the news media pay so little attention to the important pedagogical implications of education
-
7/22/2019 CAHSEE Coverage
22/28
CAHSEE News Coverage 22
issues. Perhaps the lack of a pedagogy framenot only in CAHSEE coverage, but also in
coverage of other education issuesis one root cause of general anxieties about public
education. The focus on critical events only compounds the perception that schools are failing.
If the high prevalence of the equity frame in CAHSEE coverage is replicated in other
states coverage of exit exam student outcomes, then the controversy surrounding high stakes
testing may be at least revealing long hidden inequalities in the public education system.
Coverage of drugs and violence can be framed as character problems, but when thousands of
poor students cannot meet basic requirements, it is impossible to write this off as individual
character flaws. If this is true, then exit exams may prove a double-edged sword for politicians:
high stakes testing seems an easy reform, but it may lead to trouble. At the moment, publics
seem to tentatively support high stakes testing programs, in spite of also knowing that one test is
not an accurate measure of a student; publics can hold these two conflicting opinions because
they believe that all students can rise to meet the standards and pass the test (Rose & Gallup,
2005). This attitude may change when tens of thousands of students fail to graduate. Exit exams
may prove the undoing of the accountability movement, since they are guaranteed to produce
crises that will eventually make the news agenda.
-
7/22/2019 CAHSEE Coverage
23/28
CAHSEE News Coverage 23
References
Baker, M. (1994). Media coverage of education.British Journal of Education, 42(3), 286-297.
Becker, J.P., & Jacob, B. (2000). The politics of California school mathematics: The anti-reform
of 1997-99.Phi Delta Kappan, 81(7), 529-537.
Berliner, D.C., & Biddle, B.J. (1995). The manufactured crisis: Myths, fraud, and the attack on
Americas public schools. New York: Addison-Wesley.
Blackmore, J., & Thorpe, S. (2003). Media/ting change: The print medias role in mediating
education policy in a period of radical reform in Victoria, Australia.Journal of Education
Policy,18(6), 577-595.
Bracey, G.W. (1994). The medias myth of school failure. Educational Leadership, 52(1), 80-83.
Chance, W. (1993). The press and higher education reform: A report.Santa Clara, CA: The
California Higher Education Policy Center.
Clark, M.D. (2003). The role of journalists in framing newspaper articles and editorials on school
vouchers in Detroit (Michigan) (Doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University).
Dissertation Abstracts International, 64(12), 4602.
Coleman, C.L. (1996). A war of words: How news frames define legitimacy in a native conflict.
In S.E. Bird (Ed.),Dressing in feathers: The construction of the Indian in American
popular culture (pp. 181-193). Boulder, CO: Westview.
Coleman, J. (2005, October 7). Schwarzenegger vetoes bills to alter high school exit exam.
Associated Press. Retrieved on January 5, 2006 from Lexis-Nexis database.
Dang, S. (2006, May 24). State Supreme Court reinstates exit exam for 06. Contra Costa Times.
Retrieved June 11, 2006 from Newspaper Source database.
Doyle, D.P. (1998). Education and the press: Ignorance is bliss. In G.I. Maeroff (Ed.),Imaging
-
7/22/2019 CAHSEE Coverage
24/28
CAHSEE News Coverage 24
education: The media and schools in America(pp. 46-56). New York: Teachers College
Press.
Farkas, S. (1997). Good news, bad news. New York: Public Agenda.
Fleming-Rife, A., & Proffitt, J. (2004). The more public school reform changes, the more it stays
the same: A framing analysis of the newspaper coverage of Brown v. Board of Education.
The Journal of Negro Education, 73(3), 239-254.
Galindo, R. (2004). Newspaper editorial response to Californias post-Proposition 227 test
scores.Journal of Latinos and Education, 3(4), 227-250.
Galley, M. (2004). Disability rights group makes mark on state exams.Education Week, 23(29).
Retrieved on January 5, 2006 from ERIC database.
Gamson, W.A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power:
A constructionist approach.American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1-37.
Gerstl-Pepin, C. (2002). Media (mis)representations of education in the 2000 presidential
election.Educational Policy, 16(1), 37-55.
Goffman, E. (1974).Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York:
Harper & Row.
Haffey, D.B. (2002). Tax-supported school vouchers: A framing analysis of Ohio education
reform (Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University).Dissertation Abstracts
International, 63(4), 1172.
Haniford, L. (2003, April). The making of a crisis: Achievement gap politics in one school
district. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research
Association, Chicago, IL.
Hertog, J.K., & McLeod, D.M. (2001). A multiperspectival approach to framing analysis: A field
-
7/22/2019 CAHSEE Coverage
25/28
CAHSEE News Coverage 25
guide. In S.D. Reese, O.H. Gandy, Jr., & A.E. Grant (Eds.),Framing public life:
Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world(pp. 139-161).
Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hochschild, J., & Scott, B. (1998). Trends: Governance and reform of public education in the
United States.Public Opinion Quarterly, 62(1), 97-120.
Jacobson, L. (2005). California special education students could get exam break.Education
Week, 25(2). Retrieved on January 5, 2006 from ERIC database.
Jeffs, T. (1999). Are you paying attention?: Education and the media. In B. Franklin (Ed.), Social
policy, the media and misrepresentation(pp. 157-173). London: Routledge.
Johnson, D.R., Thurlow, M., Cosio, A., & Bremer, C.D. (2005). High school graduation
requirements and students with disabilities.Developments in Secondary Education and
Transition Information Brief, 4(2). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
Kaplan, G.R. (1992).Images of education: The mass medias version of Americas schools.
Washington, D.C.: Institute for Educational Leadership.
Kinder, D.R., & Sanders, L.M. (1990). Mimicking political debates with survey questions: The
case of white opinion on affirmative action. Social Cognition, 8(1), 73-103.
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage.
Levin, B. (2004). Media-government relations in education.Journal of Education Policy, 19(3),
271-283.
Lingard, B., & Rawolle, S. (2004). Mediatizing educational policy: The journalistic field, science
policy, and cross-field effects.Journal of Education Policy, 19(3), 361-380.
Loveless, T. (1997). The structure of public confidence in education.AmericanJournal of
-
7/22/2019 CAHSEE Coverage
26/28
CAHSEE News Coverage 26
Education, 105(2), 127-159.
Maeroff, G. (2000).A symbiosis of sorts: School violence and the media (Choices Brief No. 7).
New York: Columbia University, Institute for Urban and Minority Education.
Manzo, K.K. (2001). More than half of California 9th graders flunk exit exam.Education Week,
20(41). Retrieved on January 5, 2006 from ERIC database.
McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. (1972). The agenda setting function of mass media.Public Opinion
Quarterly, 36(2), 176-187.
McCune, C. (2003). Framing reality: Shaping the news coverage of the 1996 Tennessee debate
on teaching evolution.Journal of Media and Religion, 2(1), 5-28.
McManus, J., & Dorfman, L. (2001, August). Framing youth violence.Paper presented at the
annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass
Communication, Washington, D.C.
Milburn, M.A. (1991).Persuasion and politics: The social psychology of public opinion. Pacific
Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Ogle, L.T., & Dabbs, P.A. (1998). The medias mixed record in reporting test results. In G.I.
Maeroff (Ed.),Imaging education: The media and schools in America(pp. 85-100). New
York: Teachers College Press.
Price, V. (1992).Public opinion. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Pride, R. (1995). How activists and media frame social problems: Critical events versus
performance trends for schools.Political Communication, 12(1), 5-26.
Pride, R. (1999). Redefining the problem of racial inequality. Political Communication, 16(2),
147-167.
Pride, R. (2000). Public opinion and the end of busing: (Mis)perceptions of policy failure. The
-
7/22/2019 CAHSEE Coverage
27/28
CAHSEE News Coverage 27
Sociological Quarterly, 41(2), 207-225.
Pride, R. (2002). How critical events rather than performance trends shape public evaluations of
the schools. The Urban Review, 34(2), 159-178.
Pettigrew, M. (1997). The press, public knowledge, and the grant maintained schools policy.
British Journal of Education, 45(4), 392-405.
Rose, L.C., & Gallup, A.M. (2005). The 37th annual Phi Delta Kappa / Gallup poll of the
publics attitudes toward the public schools.Phi Delta Kappan, 87(1), 41-57.
Rury, J.L. (2005).Education and social change: Themes in the history of American schooling.
Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Ryan, C. (2001). Framing, the news media, and collective action.Journal of Broadcasting and
Electronic Media, 45(1), 175-183.
Sack, J.L. (2003). California delays mandatory graduation exam until 2006.Education Week,
22(43). Retrieved on January 5, 2006 from ERIC database.
Sandham, J.L. (2000). California board votes to pare down new graduation test.Education Week,
20(15). Retrieved on January 5, 2006 from ERIC database.
Thomas, S. (1999). Who speaks for education? One newspapers reporting of a review of the
Queensland school curriculum.Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education,
20(1), 41-56.
Thomas, S. (2002). Contesting education policy in the public sphere: Media debates over policies
for the Queensland school curriculum.Journal of Education Policy, 17(2), 187-198.
Thomas, S. (2003). The trouble with our schools: A media construction of public discourse on
Queensland schools.Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 24(1), 19-
33.
-
7/22/2019 CAHSEE Coverage
28/28
CAHSEE News Coverage 28
Thompson, L.K. (2002). An analysis of the framing of an organizational crisis within a Texas
urban school district as reported by local print media (Doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M
University).Dissertation Abstracts International, 63(08), 2766
Treyens, C.C. (1997). Framing analysis, the news media, and the evolution of higher education
policy issues (Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University).Dissertation Abstracts
International, 58(1), 13.
Van Dijk, T.A. (1991).Racism and the press. London: Routledge.
Wadsworth, D. (1998). Do media shape public perceptions of Americas schools? In G.I.
Maeroff (Ed.),Imaging education: The media and schools in America(pp. 59-68). New
York: Teachers College Press.
Wallace, M. (1993). Discourse of derision: The role of the mass media within the education
policy process.Journal of Education Policy, 8(4), 321-337.
Warmington, P., & Murphy, R. (2004). Could do better? Media depictions of UK educational
assessment results.Journal of Education Policy, 19(3), 285-299.
Watson, A. (1998). The newspapers responsibility.Phi Delta Kappan, 79(10), 728-734.
Wilson, S. (2003). California dreaming: Reforming mathematics education. New Haven: Yale
University Press.