8/14/2019 Censorhsip Student Publications, Public School Law, Dr. W.A. Kritsonis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/censorhsip-student-publications-public-school-law-dr-wa-kritsonis 1/18
You can’t tell me what to write!
William Allan Kritsonis, PhD
Censorship of StudentPublication
8/14/2019 Censorhsip Student Publications, Public School Law, Dr. W.A. Kritsonis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/censorhsip-student-publications-public-school-law-dr-wa-kritsonis 2/18
The First Amendment
The First Amendment to the united StateConstitution is part of the united State Bill of Rightsthat expressly prohibits the United Sates Congressform making laws “respecting an establishment of religion” or that prohibit the free exercise of religion,laws that infringe the freedom of speech, infringe thefreedom of the press, limit the right to peaceably
assemble, or limit the right to petition the governmentfor a redress of grievances.
8/14/2019 Censorhsip Student Publications, Public School Law, Dr. W.A. Kritsonis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/censorhsip-student-publications-public-school-law-dr-wa-kritsonis 3/18
In the First Amendment the
founding Fathers gave the free pressthe protection it must have to fulfill itsessential role in our democracy. The
press was to serve the governed, notthe governors. The government’spower to sensor the press was
abolished so that the press wouldremain forever free to censure theGovernment.
8/14/2019 Censorhsip Student Publications, Public School Law, Dr. W.A. Kritsonis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/censorhsip-student-publications-public-school-law-dr-wa-kritsonis 4/18
Freedom of the press in the public
schools, however, is governed by adifferent set of constitutionalprecedents. Regulations of the
students newspapers is subject to theSupreme Court decision inHazelwood School District v.
Kuhlmeier
8/14/2019 Censorhsip Student Publications, Public School Law, Dr. W.A. Kritsonis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/censorhsip-student-publications-public-school-law-dr-wa-kritsonis 5/18
Four Categories of LitigationsConcerning Publications
1. School-sponsored newspapers
2. Nonschool, or underground,newspapers written anddistributed by students
3. Materials distributed by studentsat school but written andpublished by nonstudents
4. Internet
8/14/2019 Censorhsip Student Publications, Public School Law, Dr. W.A. Kritsonis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/censorhsip-student-publications-public-school-law-dr-wa-kritsonis 6/18
School Sponsored
u Hazelwood decision permitted the schoolto control or censor a school-
sponsored paper. Nonschoolpublications may be regulated only bytime, place, and manner of distribution; they cannot be regulatedas to content. These restrictions arecontingent upon the school havingcreated a limited public forum asopposed to a nonpublic or closedforum.
u In Hazelwood – the court said that theschool paper (theatrical productions,and other expression perceived to“bear the imprimatur”) was not apublic forum.
8/14/2019 Censorhsip Student Publications, Public School Law, Dr. W.A. Kritsonis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/censorhsip-student-publications-public-school-law-dr-wa-kritsonis 7/18
Underground Publication
u If a school permits non-schoolmaterials to be distributed then a
limited public forum has beencreated. When this happens therestriction has to be content-neutral.
u Canx Place a restriction on time,
place, and manner
restrictions on access toschool groundsu Can’t
x Control the content as ispermitted with school-sponsored publications.
8/14/2019 Censorhsip Student Publications, Public School Law, Dr. W.A. Kritsonis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/censorhsip-student-publications-public-school-law-dr-wa-kritsonis 8/18
Underground PublicationContinued
u Burch v. Barker
x Student-written our-page newspaper entitled
Bad Astra. This was critical of the schoolsadministration and did not contain vulgarity,obscenity, or defamatory statements.
x The school was not able to review it’s contentbefore distribution; it was not school related
and Hazelwood did not apply.
8/14/2019 Censorhsip Student Publications, Public School Law, Dr. W.A. Kritsonis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/censorhsip-student-publications-public-school-law-dr-wa-kritsonis 9/18
Religious Publications
u Distributing religious newsletters written bynonstudents.
u One court said it was ok, but the other courts
decision have not been uniformed.u Under Hazelwood
x If School Officials have open to the schoolto “indiscriminate use,” then the schoolbecomes a public forum an a “limited
public forum can be created.” If this isthe situation distributing religiousinformation is constitutional.
xDon’t get caught in the situation / Donot open the school to groups.
8/14/2019 Censorhsip Student Publications, Public School Law, Dr. W.A. Kritsonis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/censorhsip-student-publications-public-school-law-dr-wa-kritsonis 10/18
School officials may exercise editorial controlover school-sponsored publications if theyhave a legitimate pedagogical reason. For nonschool publications if the school hascreated a “limited public forum,” then the
school can only control the time, place, andmanner of distribution, but not the content. If a school policy required that students submitmaterials before distribution, then strong due
process procedures must be in place, or thepolicy is vulnerable to prior restraintchallenge.
8/14/2019 Censorhsip Student Publications, Public School Law, Dr. W.A. Kritsonis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/censorhsip-student-publications-public-school-law-dr-wa-kritsonis 11/18
aze woo c oo s r c v.Kuhlmeier
(School Editorials)u Spring of ’83, Journalism teacher submit page proofs
of each Spectrum issue to the Principalu May 13 principal object to two of the articles:
x Students’ experiences with pregnancy (three
students)x Impact of divorce on students at the schoolu Principals Concerns
x Different names were used, but he felt youcould still figure out who the students were
x Articles references to birth control and sexualactivity were inappropriate for some younger students
x Student identified by name regarding a divorce – parents were not given the opportunity torespond or to consent
x
8/14/2019 Censorhsip Student Publications, Public School Law, Dr. W.A. Kritsonis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/censorhsip-student-publications-public-school-law-dr-wa-kritsonis 12/18
aze woo c oo s r c v.Kuhlmeier
(School Editorials)Continued
u Principal concluded to publish a four pager instead of the six eliminating the
divorce and pregnancy pages or to notpublish a paper at all. He directed theteacher to withhold the two mentionedpublications.
u Court’s decision: Sided with theAdministrator.
8/14/2019 Censorhsip Student Publications, Public School Law, Dr. W.A. Kritsonis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/censorhsip-student-publications-public-school-law-dr-wa-kritsonis 13/18
Internet and Free Speech
Beussink v. Woodland R-IV
School District Beussink claims that the
Woodland School Districtsuspended hem from school for ten days because he had posted
a homepage on the Internetwhich was critical of WoodlandHigh School. The homepage'scriticism of the high schoolincluded crude and vulgar language.
8/14/2019 Censorhsip Student Publications, Public School Law, Dr. W.A. Kritsonis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/censorhsip-student-publications-public-school-law-dr-wa-kritsonis 14/18
Beussink v. Woodland R-IV School
District
u Court Decision:
x First Amendment right was violated. – “clean up”homepage
x Student faced academic harmu He failed 4 classes because of this and
lack of credit will delay his graduation atthe end of the school year.
x Student’s homepage did not materially andsubstantially interfere with school discipline.
x The harm to the student is greater than that tothe district if the injunction is not granted.
x District is enjoined from:u Using the 10 day suspension in its
application of its absenteeism policy,
u Enforcing any other sanction arising fromBeussink’s homepage which is thesubject of this lawsuit,
u From restricting Beussink’s use of hishome computer to repost thathomepage
x The injunctive relief was GRANTED.
8/14/2019 Censorhsip Student Publications, Public School Law, Dr. W.A. Kritsonis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/censorhsip-student-publications-public-school-law-dr-wa-kritsonis 15/18
Beussink v. Woodland R-IV School
District
u Showed a friend at home and she was upset aboutit
u
She told a teacher the next day, but Beussinkhadnot given her the address; teacher pulled up hishomepage and told the administration. Theprincipal viewed it
u Student was disciplined because the principal wasupset that it had been view at school {he did notknow other students have viewed the page bythe end of the day as well}
u Student suspended for 5 days then a second notice
was send that he would be suspended for anadditional 5 days.u School has absenteeism policy that drops students’
grades in each class by one letter grade for each unexcused absence in excess of ten days.Student had 8.5 but the additional 10 made it18.5 days.
u
8/14/2019 Censorhsip Student Publications, Public School Law, Dr. W.A. Kritsonis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/censorhsip-student-publications-public-school-law-dr-wa-kritsonis 16/18
Rosenberger v. University of Virginia (1995)
Wide-Awake Productions was deniedfunding for its newspaper, WideAwake: A Christian Perspective atthe University of Virginia, becauseit “primarily promotes a particular belief in or about a deity or anultimate reality”
The University unlike most used its
Student Activities Fund to pay the printing cost not the university’sfunds.
8/14/2019 Censorhsip Student Publications, Public School Law, Dr. W.A. Kritsonis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/censorhsip-student-publications-public-school-law-dr-wa-kritsonis 17/18
Rosenberger v. University of
Virginia (1995)(School Editorials)
Decision of the Court:
Ruled as unconstitutional studentorganization funding systems in whichsome student organization expression
(e.g., publications, speakers, posters) waspaid for by the university, but that bystudent religious organization was not.
8/14/2019 Censorhsip Student Publications, Public School Law, Dr. W.A. Kritsonis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/censorhsip-student-publications-public-school-law-dr-wa-kritsonis 18/18
Other Cases to Note
u Widmar v. Vincet (1981)
u Lemon v. Kurtzman (1981)
u
Abood v. Detroit Board of Educationu Board of Education of the Westside
Community Schools v. Mergens(1990)
u Kincaid v. Gibson (1997)
u Lamb’s Chapel v. Center MorichesUnion Free School District (1993)
u
u