Download - Chapter 2 Takeover
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Chapter 2
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Is a process wherein an acquirer takes over the control of the target company
Another aspect to takeover is where an acquirer acquires substantial quantity of shares or voting rights of the target company.
Is termed as substantial acquisition of interest
Acquirer may be an individual, company, any other legal entity or Persons Acting in Concert with the acquirer
Concept of takeover
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Persons Acting in ConcertAre individuals or companies who act on behalf
of or in coordination with the acquirer to acquire substantial number of shares in the target company
Include holding company or subsidiary company, mutual funds with its sponsor / trustee / asset management company, etc.
May have a formal or informal agreement with the acquirer in this regard
……..
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Bajoria – Bombay Dying Tussle:
PAC in case of Bajoria:Mega ResourcesMega StockHooghly MillsMs Pooja BajoriaMs Mohini Devi BajoriaMs Lata Devi Bajoria and Ms Meenakshi Jati
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Open OfferShares of the target acquired by the acquirer
through open offer
Is a public announcement to acquire the shares of the target company
Made to ensure that the shareholders of the target company become aware of an exit opportunity available to them
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Parameters of an Open Offer
Negotiated price under the agreement that triggers the open offer
Is the highest price paid by acquirer or persons acting in concert for any acquisitions
Includes shares allotted through public issue or rights issue during the 26 week period , as statutorily prescribed, prior to the date of the open offer
……….
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Parameters…..
Average weekly high and low of the closing prices of shares as quoted on the stock exchanges, where shares of the target company are traded during 26 weeks or average of the daily high and low prices of shares during the 2 weeks prior to the date of the open offer.
Parameters such as return on net worth of the company, book value per share, EPS, etc. where shares are not listed
The Torrent group made an open offer to acquire 20% in Ahmedabad Electricity Company ("AEC") at Rs. 65 per share
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Global Trends
Very common in the United States and in the United Kingdom
Very occasional and rare in Germany, Japan or China.
The reason:Germany practices dual board structureJapanese companies have interlocking sets of
ownerships known as KEIRETSU and In China most public listed companies are
state owned
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Forms of Takeover
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Bailout
Involves takeover of a financially sick company by a financially rich company as per the provisions of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special provisions) Act, 1985
Objective behind this takeover is to bail out the sick unit from losses
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Friendly TakeoverIs one where the acquirer acquires the shares of
the target by informing the board of directors his intention to purchase the shares of the target company
If board feels the offer is worth accepting, it recommends to the shareholders that the offer be accepted
The acquirer may either acquire the assets or purchase the stock of the target
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Advantages of Friendly Takeover through Purchase of Assets
Allows acquirer to purchase only those assets that it desires to purchase
Acquirer is not required to take over any contingent liabilities of the target
Provides the acquirer with an opportunity to negotiate the price with the board of directors, as the approval of the shareholders is not required.
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Advantages of Friendly Takeover through Purchase of Stock
Acquirer has to assume the liabilities of the target firm
Target firm may continue to operate as an autonomous subsidiary or it may be merged with the acquiring firm
Approval of the shareholders of the target firm is needed for this type of acquisition
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Hostile Takeover
One where the board of directors of the target firm disagrees to the offer of the acquirer to purchase the shares, but the acquirer continues to pursue it or makes the offer by by-passing the target company’s management
Represents an offer made by the acquirer without informing the target company’s management about their intention of acquiring stake in the company.
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
A Tender Offer Is an offer to buy the stock of the target firm either
directly from the shareholders or through the secondary market
Acquirer intends to buy the company's stock to the target firm’s board of directors
Proposal carries a clear indication that if the offer is turned down a tender offer shall be resorted to
Strategy expensive as the price payable is higher than the market price; also the stock price tends to rise in anticipation of a takeover
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
A Proxy FightHere, the acquirer approaches the shareholders
of the target firm with an objective of obtaining the right to vote for their shares
Hopes to secure enough proxies that would help in gaining control over the board of directors and replace the incumbent’s management
Are a very expensive and difficult mode of takeover for the incumbent management team can use the target firm's funds to pay all the costs of presenting their case and obtaining votes
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Creeping Tender Offer
Involves purchasing enough stock from the open market to bring about a change in management.
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Horizontal Takeover
Is a process where a company takes over another company from the same industry
Basic objective is to attain economies of scale and increase market share by entering into the market segments of the company taken over
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Vertical TakeoverIs one where a company is taken over by any
of its vendors or customers
Can be of two types: backward and Forward
Backward is one where the business of the vendor is taken over in order to reduce costs
Forward is one where the business of the customer is taken over in order to access market directly
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Conglomerate Takeover
Is one where a company takes over another company from a totally different industry
Is pursued with the objective of attaining diversification.
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Reverse Takeover
Is a takeover strategy where a private company acquires a public company
Helps private company to effectively float itself and at the same time bypass the lengthy and complex process of going public by coming out with an IPO
Makes the company less susceptible to market conditions
………
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Reverse......
Public company is called SHELL as all that exists of the original company is its organizational structure.
Biggest problem is that the company comes with some history, which can be bad, resulting in sloppy record keeping, pending lawsuits and contingent liabilities and some shareholders and the resulting company has to live with this history
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Benefits of Takeover Helps the acquirer to attain increase in sales/ revenues Helps acquirer to venture into new business segments and
markets with ease Improves overall profitability of the entity Helps the acquirer in increasing its market share Reduces competition from the perspective of the acquiring
company Reduces overcapacity in industry Helps acquirer to expand the brand portfolio Generates benefits of economies of scale Helps attain increased efficiency as a result of corporate
synergies Helps in eliminating jobs that overlap in responsibilities
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Weaknesses of Takeovers
Reduces competition and choice for consumers
Results in job cuts
Cultural differences lead to conflict
Acquirer often burdened with hidden liabilities
of the target entity
Employees of the target company work in an
environment of fear and uncertainty affecting
motivational levels.
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Takeover Defences: Bank-mail
A strategy where the bank of the target firm refuses financing options to a firm that is keen on takeover.
Is done with the objective of preventing acquisition:
By depriving the merger through non availability of finance
By increasing the transaction costs of the acquirerBy delaying the takeover and permitting the target firm
to develop other anti-takeover strategies.
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Greenmail
Is a practice of purchasing enough shares of another publicly traded company that poses a threat of takeover for the target company
Threat of a takeover then forces the target firm to buy those shares at a premium, in order to avoid/suspend the takeover.
Buyback is referred as the Bon Voyage Bonus for it enables the target company to be left alone by the greenmailer
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Crown Jewel Defense
Is a strategy wherein a company facing a threat of takeover sells off its most attractive assets to a friendly third party or spins off its valuable assets in a separate entity
Makes the target company less attractive for the company planning a takeover, which then loses interest and defers the takeover bid.
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Poison Pill/ Super Poison Put
A strategy adopted to increase the likelihood of negative results over positive ones for the company attempting a takeover
Derived from warfare terminology - Were pills laced with poison that spies used to carry and would consume when they would get discovered or captured, in order to eliminate the possibility of being interrogated for the enemy's gain
………
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Represents an anti-takeover defense wherein the current management team of the target company threatens to quit en masse in the event of a successful hostile takeover
Effectiveness depends on the circumstances of the takeover - If the management team is efficient and quits en masse, the acquirer would be left without experienced leadership following a takeover. On the other hand, if the current leadership is inefficient he will get fired after the takeover making the poison pill becomes ineffective
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Flip-over
Type of poison pill in which the current shareholders of the target company are given the option to purchase discounted shares/stock after the potential takeover
Strategy involves giving a dividend in the form of rights whereby the existing shareholder can purchase equity or preference shares at a value that is lower than the prevailing market price
………
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Once takeover is done, the current shareholders can “flip over” the rights to purchase the shares at a discount
Strategy results in dilution and price devaluation of the shares held by the acquirer and defeats the very purpose of the takeover
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Gray Knight
Is an informal and ambiguous intervener in the takeover battle that makes a counter bid for the shares of the target company
Intervener’s bid causes a lot of confusion amongst the original acquirer and the target company as the intentions behind his making a counter bid are not clear
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Jonestown Defense/Suicide Pill Defense mechanism against hostile takeovers
Target firm employs tactics that might threaten the target firm’s existence, so as to thwart an imposing acquirer’s bids
Is known as Suicide Pill as it threatens the very existence of the target
Represents an extreme version of poison pill.
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Killer Bees
Here the target company employs firms or individuals to fend off a takeover bid as is either is unable to do this on its own / does not want to be seen doing so.
So employs other firms or individuals to do the job for it
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Leveraged Recapitalization
Is a strategy used to fend off a hostile acquisition
Here the target company adopts one of the two possible strategies: Borrow significant additional debt that facilitates
repurchase of stocks through a buyback program or Distribute a liberal dividend among the current
shareholders
…….
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Leads to a sharp increase in the share price and makes target less attractive as the acquirer has to pay more for the target company minimizing the gains for the acquirer
Is a form of poison pill that serves two purposes, viz. an increase in the debt of the target making the acquisition costly and maintains shareholders interest in takeover attempts
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Lock-up Provision Represents a strategy wherein an option is
granted by the seller to the buyer to purchase a target company’s stock as a prelude to a takeover.
Acquirer requires a lock up agreement before making a bid as it facilitates negotiation progress - as a result of this arrangement, the major or controlling shareholder gets effectively "locked-up" and is not free to sell the stocks to a party other than the potential buyer
……….
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Lock-ups can either be:
“Soft” - one that permits the shareholder to terminate the agreement if a better offer comes along
“Hard” - one that is unconditional and cannot be terminated
Stock lock-up – Where the bidder is either allowed to purchase the Authorized but Unissued Share Capital of the controlling stockholder or the shares of one or more large stockholders.
Asset lock-up/Crown Jewel Lock up – where the target firm grants an option for the acquisition of an asset.
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
May take any one of the following forms:Break-up involving payment of termination fees Giving an option to the target shareholders to buy target
stock
Giving rights to target shareholders to purchase target assets
Forcing the vote provisions in merger agreements, and
Enforcing agreements with major shareholders viz. voting agreements, agreements to sell shares, or agreements to tender.
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Nancy Reagan Defense
Is one where the boards of directors of the target company just say “no” to the formal bid made by the acquirer to the shareholders to buy their shares.
Board has authority of refusing the company making a takeover attempt and the matter ends there.
Constitution of the company gives them this authority.
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
The term refers to a catch-phrase coined by former United States First Lady Nancy Reagan advocating “abstinence from recreational drug use”.
For Example: A discussion of a takeover of the Walt Disney Company by Comcast
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Non-voting Stock Are shares that provide the shareholder with very
little or no voting rights on issues such as election of the board or mergers
Issued to individuals who want to invest in the company’s profitability and success but are not interested in voting rights
Preference shares are typically non-voting shares.
Help in making the company a closely held act as a takeover defense
……….
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
For Example: Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathway Corporation has two classes of shares viz. Class A shares that
are voting stocks and Class B that are non-voting
shares. The Class B stocks carry 1/200th of the voting
rights of the Class A, but 1/30th of the dividends
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Pac-Man Defense
Is commonly used to prevent a hostile takeover
Here the target company counters the takeover bid by trying to acquire the bidder’s company i.e. the target company makes a counter offer to purchase the business of the acquiring company
Diverts the acquirer attention as the acquirer gets busy in preventing the takeover of their own company
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
For Example:
The hostile takeover of Martin Marietta by Bendix Corporation in 1982. In response, Martin Marietta started buying Bendix stock with the aim of
assuming control over the company. Bendix persuaded
Allied Corporation to act as a "white knight," and the company was sold to Allied the same year.
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Pension Parachute Companies often carry surplus cash in the pension
fund, which is put to use as and when companies require resources
Is a type of poison pill strategy that prevents the acquirer to go ahead with a hostile takeover by utilizing the surplus cash in the pension fund for financing the acquisition
Ensures through corporate governance practices that resources in the pension fund account do not get used for financing hostile takeover
………
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
The concept of pension parachute was evolved by the law firm – Kelley Dyer and Warren, which they implemented for Union Carbide. The design was upheld in Union Carbide’s litigation with GAF Corporation. GAF Corporation subsequently withdrew its hostile takeover bid, but profited $81 million from sales of Union Carbide stock.
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
People Pill
Is another defensive strategy adopted to ward off a hostile takeover.
Here the management of the target company threatens the acquirer that in the event of a takeover, the entire management team will resign.
This strategy is a variation of poison pill defense strategy.
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Lollipop DefenseIs a strategy wherein the target creates
barriers outside its periphery to protect the company from a takeover
Called lollipop defense as the company is compared to lollipops that have a hard crunchy exterior but a soft chewy centre i.e. the takeover is made difficult by the barriers (hard crunchy exterior) but the company in general is an attractive takeover target (soft chewy centre)
……..
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Target company presumes that creating a lollipop defense provides adequate security from the takeover attempt
Fact is once the acquirer is able to overcome the barriers (hard crunchy exterior), the target stands exposed (soft chewy centre) and takeover then becomes a matter of time
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Macaroni DefenseIs a strategy wherein the target issues a large
number of bonds in the market carrying a peculiar condition i.e. if the company is taken over, the bonds will have to be redeemed at a very high price.
High redemption price of the bonds acts as deterrence and the acquirer may be forced to give up the takeover bid
Called Macaroni defense for the target is facing a danger of takeover and the redemption price of the bonds starts expanding like Macaroni being cooked
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Lobster Trap (comparable to Chakravyuh)Is one where the target firm issues a charter
preventing individuals with more than 10% ownership of convertible securities such as convertible bonds, convertible preference shares, and warrants from transferring these securities to voting stock
Charter becomes a barrier and hostile takeover becomes difficult
Makes it becomes difficult for acquirer to exit the bid as can neither acquire controlling stake nor can it exit from the limited stake acquired
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Shark Repellent/Porcupine Defense or Provision
Shark repellent is a repellent applied by deep sea divers to prevent sharks from attacking them The target company makes special amendments to its bylaws that become active only when a takeover attempt is announced
Objective of the special amendments is to make the takeover less attractive to the acquirer
In such a case, the acquirer is termed as the shark and the proposed amendments are repellents that prevent the shark from attacking ………..
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
May not always be in the best interest of the shareholders as may adversely affect the financial health of the company
Strategies adopted include under shark
repellent Poison pillsScorched earth policyGolden parachutes and Safe harbor
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Poison Put / Event Risk Covenant
Is a strategy wherein the bondholders and stockholders are assigned a right whereby they can demand redemption of stock before maturity, at a value in excess of the par value
ORAllows the shareholders to purchase the
company’s shares at a very attractive fixed price in case of restructuring of the company, excess distribution of dividend
………
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Helps the management of the company to deter the takeover attempt by making the target very costly for the acquirer
Strategy can work against the company too – during low liquidity bondholders can pressurize the company to go into reorganization or to increase the borrowing cost
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Safe harbour
The target company creates barriers making it difficult for the acquirer to succeed in their takeover attempt
Barriers work as if the target is safe in the harbour and beyond the reach of the acquirer (shark).
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Scorched-earth DefenseConcept originated as a military strategy
Involved a defence strategy wherein a retreating army would burn crops and trees, so that there would be no fresh supplies to the advancing army.
As an anti-defense strategy, scorched earth policy involves liquidating valuable and desired assets and assuming fresh liabilities
Makes proposed takeover becomes unattractive to the acquiring firm
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Selling the Crown Jewels
Represents the most valuable unit or department of a company.
Categorized as crown jewels based on their profitability, value of assets owned, and future growth prospects
Target company creates anti-takeover clauses, whereby the company gets the right to sell off the crown jewels if a hostile takeover occurs
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
ShowstopperImplies inserting such a clause that imposes additional
financial burden on the acquirer in the event of a takeover
Example: Acquirer is required to pay for the offer within a stipulated
period. If the acquirer fails to pay the dues, the shareholders of the target may grant extension, subject to the acquirer agreeing to pay interest to the shareholders for the delayed payment.
Where the acquirer refuses to pay the additional amount, the agreement falls through and acquirer is required to pay compensation
………
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Acquirer is the loser in either case if the deals fall throughEither pay the interestPay compensation
Creates financial burden on the acquirer
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Staggered Board of Directors Is a defense wherein a certain percent of the company’s
Director are replaced every year and not the entire board being replaced annually
Makes it difficult for the acquirer to seize control over the target, as the hostile bidder has to win more than one proxy fight at successive shareholder meetings in order to exercise control over the target
In order to facilitate staggering Directors are classified into group or class and each group required to vacate their post by rotation …….
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Institutional shareholders in US have been increasingly calling for an end to staggering / declassifying boards of directors so that the practice of retiring by rotation comes to an end
Reason - All desirable names drop from the list of the directors affecting investor’s confidence.
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Standstill AgreementsHere an unfriendly bidder agrees to limit his
holdings of a target firm
Made possible by the target firm’s willingness to purchase the potential acquirer’s (raider ’s) shares at a premium price
Enacts a standstill or eliminates chances of a takeover attempt by the potential raider
Gives the target company time to build up other takeover defences...........
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Can also take another form - wherein two or more parties agree not to deal with other parties in a particular matter for a specified period of time For Example: An agreement not to go ahead with an acquisition of other parties
Allows the concerned parties to devote more time for negotiation, due diligence, and details of a potential acquisition/defense they are currently working on
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Targeted Repurchase
The target firm purchases back its own shares from an unfriendly bidder at a price well above market value
Numbers of shares re-purchased help target firm to regain controlling interest in the company by having adequate shareholders votes to prevent the hostile acquisition
Targeted repurchase considered a success if the strategy results in abandonment of the takeover attempt ……..
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Not necessary that the raider company may accept the price offered
Here the raider continues with its attempt of hostile takeover and the target generally combines the targeted repurchase offer with another strategy
For Example: Setting up a holding company that receives all acquired shares and starting the process of converting the same into employee stock ownership plan (ESOPs)
……..
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Defeats the very objective of pursuing a hostile takeover as raider left with no other option but to accept a market price for the shares under their control
Refusal to accept this generates risk of the shares becoming worthless, once ESOP is approved by the regulatory authorities
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Top-upsIs a type of stock repurchase program
Here shares are repurchased from the existing shareholders of the company
Buyback results in immediate reduction of the voting power of the shareholders
Shareholders may however subsequently increase their holdings through additional purchases which is called a top-up
...........
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
For Example:Company X holds 10% shares in a company, which
implies that it has 10% voting power too. Company Y offers to purchase 5% of the shares from Company X with the latter’s consent. This purchase also reduces the voting power of Company X to 5%. If at a later date, Company X wants to increase its voting rights to say 8%, it can purchase 3% shares form the open market. This 3% purchase is called top up.
Advantage of top up strategy is that it provides the target company with time for enhancing and strengthening its takeover defense mechanism
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Treasury Stock Also known as reacquired stock
Are shares/stock bought back by the issuing company with the objective of reducing the amount of outstanding stock in the open market
Is a tax-efficient tool of giving cash to shareholders instead of dividend
Strategy adopted by companies to protect the company against a takeover threat
……….
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Shares repurchased either cancelled or held for reissue
Knows as Treasury shares/stock when not sold
Have the following characteristics: Do not involve payment of any dividend Have no voting rights Should not exceed the maximum proportion of total
capitalization specified by relevant legal provisionsPossession of shares does not give the company the
right to vote, rights of a shareholder, receive dividends, or to receive any part of the assets on liquidation
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
White KnightIs a situation where a target faces a hostile
takeover attempt from a company and is struggling to avoid the same
At the moment another company makes a friendly takeover offer to the target company in order to help the target successfully avoid the hostile takeover bid
Friendly takeover offer is to save the target from the hostile attempt and the company making a friendly offer called a white knight
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
White SquireIs similar to a white knight
Only difference is that a white squire exercises a significant minority stake, as opposed to a majority stake.
Does not have any intention of getting involved in the takeover battle, but serves as a figurehead in defense of a hostile takeover due to the special voting rights it holds for its equity stake holds in the company
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
A Voting Plan or Voting Rights Plan
Type of poison pill that the target company issues against hostile takeover attempts
Plan implemented when the company’s constitution provides for shares that carry superior voting rights compared to ordinary shares
When an unfriendly bidder acquires a substantial voting stock, it may still not be able to exercise control because the stock carrying superior voting rights will help the company fight the hostile takeover bid
…….
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
For Example: Asarco had a voting pattern wherein holding 99% of the company’s common stock would give the holders only 16.5% of the voting power
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
WhitemailIs another strategy wherein the target company
issues large number of shares to a friendly party at a price quite below the market price
Forces the acquiring company to purchase these shares from the party to complete the takeover
Strategy discourages takeover by making the deal more difficult and expensive as the corporate raider is required to purchase shares from a party that is friendly to the target company
……..
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Once takeover is averted the target company may either buy back the issued shares or leave them floating in the market
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Takeover Code
Takeover represented one major unhealthy practice
SEBI issued Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeover Regulations in 1994.
Covered both friendly and hostile takeovers
In a friendly takeover SEBI keen on making sure that the minority shareholders get fair treatment
………
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Concern was deeper in hostile takeover as the acquirer goes ahead with its plan without the knowledge and against the wishes of the existing management
SEBI incorporated provisions to make takeover transparent
Excluded “bailout takeover of companies” i.e. BIFR cases
………
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Provisions were found inadequate due to in-built ambiguity and loop-holes and failures in takeovers
Failures resulted in appointment of Justice P.N Bhagwati Committee to:Review the guidelines issued in 1994Study the effect of takeovers and mergers on
securities market To evolve appropriate provisions for regulating
takeovers and mergers ……….
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Committee concluded:Strong need for takeover code to retain the
confidence of retail investors in the capital marketsNeed to provide an exit opportunity to the investors
in case they do not want to continue with the new management
Full and truthful disclosure to be made on all material information relating to the open offer to facilitate informed decision
Acquirer to ensure sufficiency of financial resources for the payment of acquisition price to the investors
Disclosures be made on all material transactions at the earliest opportunity ............
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Clause 40 A and B of the Listing Agreements introduced to protect Minority Shareholders interest
Clauses prescribe a basic framework pertaining to initial disclosure before going ahead with acquisition of shares from the public
Code does not permit a "poison pill" defense, but
empowers Indian companies to block hostile takeovers by foreign companies through Press Note 18.........
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Press Note 18
Is in a series of press releases issued by the Indian Ministry of Industry in 1998
Provisions include:Automatic route for FDI and/or technology collaboration would not
be available to those who have or had any previous joint venture or technology transfer / trademark agreement in the same or allied field in India
Investors of technology to the suppliers of the above category need to seek the Foreign Investment Promotion Board / Project Approval Board (FIPB/PAB) route for joint ventures or technology transfer agreements (including trademarks)
……….
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Giving detailed circumstances in which they find it necessary to set up a new joint venture/enter into new technology transfer (including trademark).
Onus on investors/technology suppliers to provide the requisite justification and also proof to the satisfaction of FIPB/PAB that the new proposal would not in any way jeopardize the interests of the existing joint venture or technology/trademark partner or other stakeholders
Rejection or acceptance of proposal with or without conditions is the sole discretion of FIPB/PAB recording the reasons for doing so
Foreign companies wanting to set up new operations in India need to furnish a no objection certificate from Indian joint venture partners, past or present
Certificate has to be submitted to the FIPB
……….
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Regulations are stringent but there is a strong need to keep reviewing the regulations so that they remain in tune with time.
© Oxford University Press 2011. All rights reserved.
Thank you!