![Page 1: Chapter 20 Antitrust and Regulation of Competition Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f335503460f94c4f553/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Chapter 20
Antitrust and Regulationof Competition
Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
![Page 2: Chapter 20 Antitrust and Regulation of Competition Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f335503460f94c4f553/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
20-2
Background, Purpose, and Source of Antitrust Law
• Antitrust laws are federal statutes and the agencies charged with enforcement of these laws are the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission.
• Violators of antitrust laws are subject to both civil penalties and criminal sanctions, including incarceration.
![Page 3: Chapter 20 Antitrust and Regulation of Competition Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f335503460f94c4f553/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
20-3
Sherman Antitrust Act
• Sherman Act is divided into two parts:
• First, the act provides prohibitions against restraints of trade. The Sherman Act prohibits “[e]very contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce.”
• The second part of the act covers monopolization. The Sherman Act provides a remedy against “[e]very person who shall monopolize, or attempt to monopolize . . . any part of the trade or commerce among the several States
![Page 4: Chapter 20 Antitrust and Regulation of Competition Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f335503460f94c4f553/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
20-4
Rule of Reason
Under this standard, a business alleged to have committed a violation may offer evidence that their actions were reasonable because they were justified and necessitated by economic conditions.
![Page 5: Chapter 20 Antitrust and Regulation of Competition Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f335503460f94c4f553/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
20-5
Per Se Sherman Act Violations: Restraints
The U.S. Supreme Court and other federal appellate courts have developed a body of case law that deems certain actions or transactions as a per se, or automatic, violation of the Sherman Act.
![Page 6: Chapter 20 Antitrust and Regulation of Competition Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f335503460f94c4f553/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
20-6
Horizontal Restraints
• Meeting of the Minds
• Price-fixing
• Market Allocation
• Boycotts
![Page 7: Chapter 20 Antitrust and Regulation of Competition Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f335503460f94c4f553/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
20-7
Vertical Restraints
Vertical price-fixing occurs when a seller attempts to control the resale price of a product at a lower level in the supply chain.
![Page 8: Chapter 20 Antitrust and Regulation of Competition Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f335503460f94c4f553/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
20-8
Nonprice Restraints
• The per se standard does not apply to nonprice vertical restraints.
• Rather, a court applies the rule of reason standard (discussed earlier in this section).
• Vertical restraints that do not involve price-fixing generally refer to some type of restraint on the distribution of a product in the marketplace.
![Page 9: Chapter 20 Antitrust and Regulation of Competition Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f335503460f94c4f553/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
20-9
Tying Agreements
• Tying agreements occur when a seller refuses to sell a certain product (the tying product) unless the buyer also purchases a different product (the tied product) from the seller.
• Typically, this occurs where a seller has a substantial share of the market for the tying product, and is attempting to leverage the power of the tying product to gain market share for another of the seller’s products.
![Page 10: Chapter 20 Antitrust and Regulation of Competition Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f335503460f94c4f553/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
20-10
Antitrust Law and Professional Sports
One particularly difficult question under antitrust law is whether professional sports leagues, such as the National Football League, are a legitimate joint venture or whether sports leagues are a conspiracy to restrain trade that is prohibited by the Sherman Act.
![Page 11: Chapter 20 Antitrust and Regulation of Competition Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f335503460f94c4f553/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
20-11
Monopolization
The Sherman Act does not prohibit a business entity from becoming a monopoly, but it does outlaw affirmative action toward monopolizing or attempting to monopolize a part of trade or commerce.
![Page 12: Chapter 20 Antitrust and Regulation of Competition Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f335503460f94c4f553/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
20-12
Clayton Act
The Clayton Act (and its amendments) curb certain anticompetitive practices that are not specifically covered by the Sherman Act.
![Page 13: Chapter 20 Antitrust and Regulation of Competition Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f335503460f94c4f553/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
20-13
Mergers and Acquisitions
• The Clayton Act was designed to prevent this monopoly strategy.
• The act prohibits business entities from acquiring the stock or assets of their competitors where the action will substantially lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly.
![Page 14: Chapter 20 Antitrust and Regulation of Competition Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f335503460f94c4f553/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
20-14
Hart-Scott-Rodino Act
• Preventative statute that requires business entities that are contemplating mergers involving dollar amounts of a certain size to give advance notice to the FTC and the Department of Justice of their intention.
![Page 15: Chapter 20 Antitrust and Regulation of Competition Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f335503460f94c4f553/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
20-15
Robinson-Patman Act
• Enacted in 1936, amended the Clayton Act provisions to provide for broader regulatory authority to curb price discrimination
• To violate law, a business entity must have made two or more sales to different purchasers at different prices.
• This means that quoting a discriminatory price or refusal to sell except at a discriminatory price are not violations of the act.