Chapter 8 The Selection Process
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.
External Candidates
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.
8-3
Logic of Prediction: Past Performance Predicts Future Performance
Not specific enough to make selection decisions Job titles Number of years of experience
What counts is the specific types of experiences required and the level of success at each
Assessment Methods by Applicant Flow
Stage
9-4
8-5
Resumes and Cover Letters
Information provided is controlled by applicant Information needs to be verified by other predictors
to ensure accuracy and completeness
Major issues Large number received by organizations Falsification and misrepresentation of information
8-6
Overview of Application Blanks
What areas are covered? Education Training Job experience
Key advantage -- Organization dictates information provided
Major issue -- Information requested should Be critical to job success and Reflect KSAOs relevant to job
8-7
Reference Checks
Approach involves verifying applicant’s background via contact with Prior immediate supervisor(s) or coworkers, or HR department of current of previous companies
What are the possible problems? Same as problems with letters of recommendation Reluctance of companies to provide requested
information due to legal concerns
2-8
Fair Credit Reporting Act (1970)
Purpose Regulates organization’s acquisition and use of consumer
reports on job applicants Required compliance
Before obtaining a report, organization must Give applicant notice in writing a report may be obtained Obtain written authorization from applicant
If an “adverse action” is taken, organization must Notify (written, oral, electronic) applicant of adverse action Provide information of consumer reporting agency to
applicant Provide notice of applicant’s rights to applicant
Enforcement Enforced by Federal Trade Commission Noncompliance may result in fines up to $1,000
2-9
EEOC’s Enforcement Guidance on Criminal Records (2012)
For arrest and conviction records in employment decisions Inquiring about arrest and/or conviction records, while not per
se unlawful, can lead to potential discrimination issues if not handled properly.
Blanket policies may result in: Disparate impact Disparate treatment Race and national origin
Determinations should be made on an individual case-by-case basis
2-10
EEOC’s Enforcement Guidance on Criminal Records (2012)
Generally prohibits decisions based on arrests/convictions that are not job related and consistent with business necessity – criteria: Nature of the crime; and Time elapsed since it occurred; and Its relation to the nature of the job had or sought.
Employers need to Give notice to applicant or employee that they have been
screened out because of criminal conviction; Provide with opportunity to demonstrate that exclusion should
not be applied due to their particular circumstances; and Consider whether the additional information provided
warrants an exception to the exclusion and shows that the policy as applied is not job related and consistent with business necessity.
2-11
Use of Criminal Records - California
Don’t ask applicants to disclose information About an arrest or detention that did not result in conviction. Relating to a referral to or participation in a criminal diversion
program (a work education program as part of probation). About convictions for most marijuana possession offenses
more than two years old. You can’t seek the information from any other source,
nor use it as a factor in hiring, promoting, training, or termination.
You can ask employees and applicants about any arrest for which the employee or applicant is out on bail or out on their own recognizance pending trial.
Certain exceptions exist for peace officers, health care employees, and people with access to drugs and medication.
8-12
Initial Interview
CharacteristicsBegins process of necessary differentiationPurpose -- Screen out most obvious cases
of person / job mismatchesLimitation -- Most expensive method
of initial assessmentVideo and computer interviews
Offers cost savings
8-13
Evaluation of Initial Interview
Guidelines to enhance usefulnessAsk questions assessing most basic KSAOsStick to basic, fundamental questions
suitable for making rough cuts rather than subjective questions
Keep interviews briefAsk same questions of all applicants
9-14
Discretionary Assessment Methods
Used to separate people who receive job offers from list of finalists (assumes each finalist is considered fully qualified for position)
Often very subjective, relying heavily on intuition of decision maker
Factors other than KSAOs are evaluated Assess person/organization match Assess motivation level Assess people on relevant organizational
citizenship behaviors
9-15
Contingent Assessment Methods
“We offer you this job contingent upon ….”
Might involve confirmation ofDrug test resultsMedical exam resultsBackground check results
Internal Candidates
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.
10-17
Logic of Prediction: Past Performance Predicts Future Performance
Advantages of internal over external selection Greater depth and relevance of data available
on internal candidates Greater emphasis can be placed on samples
and criteria rather than signs
10-18
Skills Inventory
Use skills inventory for data on employees List of KSAOs held by each employee Records a small number of skills listed in generic
categories, such as education, experience, and supervisory training received
10-19
Substantive Assessment Methods
Seniority and experienceJob knowledge testsPerformance appraisalsPromotability ratingsAssessment centersInterviews
10-20
Overview of Seniority and Experience
Definitions Seniority
Length of service with organization, department, or job Experience
Not only length of service but also kinds of activities an employee has undertaken
Why so widely used? Direct experience in a job content area reflects an
accumulated stock of KSAOs necessary to perform job Information is easily and cheaply obtained Protects employee from unfair treatment and favoritism Promoting senior or experienced employees is socially
acceptable -- viewed as rewarding loyalty
10-21
Evaluation of Seniority and Experience
Employees typically expect promotions will go to most senior or experienced employee
Relationship to job performance Seniority is unrelated to job performance Experience is moderately related to job performance,
especially in the short run Experience is superior because it is:
a more valid method than seniority more likely to be content valid when past or present jobs are
similar to the future job Experience is unlikely to remedy initial performance
difficulties of low-ability employees is better suited to predict short-term rather than long-term
potential
10-22
Job Knowledge Tests
Job knowledge includes elements of both ability and seniority
Measured by a paper-and-pencil test or a computer
Holds great promise as a predictor of job performanceReflects an assessment of what was
learned with experienceAlso captures cognitive ability
10-23
Performance Appraisal
A possible predictor of future job performance is past job performance collected by a performance appraisal process
Advantages Readily available Probably capture both ability and motivation
Weaknesses Potential lack of a direct correspondence between
requirements of current job and requirements of position applied for
10-24
Principles of Promotion
“Peter Principle” - 1969 Employees tend to be promoted until they reach a
position at which they cannot work competently.
“Dilbert Principle” – 1990’s Companies tend to systematically promote their
least-competent employees to management (generally middle management), in order to limit the amount of damage they are capable of doing.
10-25
Discretionary Assessment Methods
Narrows list of finalists to those who will receive job offers
Decisions often made on basis ofOrganizational citizenship behavior
Differences from external selectionPrevious finalists not receiving job offers do
not simply disappear