Download - Cipla case analysis
![Page 1: Cipla case analysis](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081803/577cc6ba1a28aba7119efdb2/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
What is your assessment of how well the various parties are handling the global AIDS problems?Parties Actions Analysis
Government in Developed countries
(+) Funded heavily in initial R&D(+) Reduced time to approval
(+) Identified the need (-) No control over high priced drugs
Government in Developing countriesIndia & Africa
(+) Developed policies to make AIDS medication more affordable(+) Joined hands with NGOs(-) Lacked stringent laws for patent protection
(+) Raised concern about the profit orientation by Pharma Co.
Major Pharma Companies
(+) Invested heavily in R&D for new drug development, 16%(+) Formed alliances to reduce costs for AIDS medication (-) Highly profit oriented
(-) Took advantage of pandemic and delayed actions to make drugs affordable
![Page 2: Cipla case analysis](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081803/577cc6ba1a28aba7119efdb2/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
What is your assessment of how well the various parties are handling the global AIDS problems?
Parties Actions Analysis
Cipla (+) Made AIDS medication affordable(+) Pointed out ever-greening and increasing advertisement budgets
(+) Limited profit – Co. was willing to help the infected people (+) Made attempts to discover real cost of drug
NGOs, Charities and Global Agencies
(+) Made appeals to Pharma Co. to make AIDS drugs available(+) Operated projects worldwide
(+) Led the campaign against AIDS(+) Act as intermediate b/w Pharma Co. & people(-) Limited powers to implement and control