Transcript
Page 1: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

42510011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

a

B

Z

Can YouTube Help Teacher Education?

Abendroth, Ed.D. [email protected]

Golzy, Ph.D. [email protected]

O’Connor, Ph.D. [email protected]

Empire State College

CIT 2011, Oneonta, NY

Page 2: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

MAT Program

Teaching & Learning Structure

T&L _ Mathematics

T&L _ Science

T&L _ Social Studies

Conclusion

Page 3: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

MASTER OF ARTS IN TEACHING

An alternative teacher certification program for adult learners

Page 4: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

TRANSITIONAL B CERTIFICATION

• Purpose: to meet needs of under-resourced schools.

• Earned after first year of courses, 50 hours of field experience, & passing CST and LAST exams.

• Leads to NYS Initial Teacher Certification after two years of mentored teaching.

Page 5: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

Year 1

• Effective Urban Schools

• Child & Adolescent Development

• Teaching & Learning

• Exceptionalities

• Teaching Diverse Learners

Page 6: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

Year 2

• Teaching & Curriculum

• Mentored Teaching 1

• Educational Evaluation

• Mentored Teaching 2

• Content Area Studies

Page 7: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

Year 3

• Literacy

• Mentored Teaching 3

• Literacy across Curriculum

• MAT Portfolio

Page 8: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

MAT Program

Teaching & Learning Structure

T&L _ Mathematics

T&L _ Science

T&L _ Social Studies

Conclusion

Page 9: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

Page 10: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

MAT Program

Teaching & Learning Structure

T&L _ Mathematics

T&L _ Science

T&L _ Social Studies

Conclusion

Page 11: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

T&L _ Mathematics

Modeling

Micro-Teaching

Assessment

Page 12: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

Procedural Vs. Conceptual Lesson

• A procedural lesson is about how to do something, and how to get the answer to an exercise.

• A conceptual lesson is about why something works. It allows students modify previously learned concepts to solve new problems.

Page 13: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

A Procedural Lesson

• Use FOIL to expand (x + 3)(2x + 4).

• FOIL stands for “First, Outer, Inner, Last.”

• Therefore, (x + 3)(2x + 4 ) = 2x2 + 4x + 6x + 12

Page 14: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

A Conceptual Lesson

• Views (x + 3)(2x + 4) as a distribution.• How many marbles do I need if I am distributing 5

marbles to each of my 23 students? 5 * 23 = 115• How many… 2 red and 3 green marbles to each of my 23

students? (2 + 3)(23) = 46 + 69 = 115• …• How many… 2 red and 3 green marbles to each of my10

male and 13 female students? (2 + 3)(10 + 13) = 20 +….• What do you think (x + 3)(2x + 4) is equal to?

Page 15: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

T&L _ Mathematics

Modeling

Micro-Teaching

Assessment

Page 16: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

YouTube on Solving linear Equations

1. Linking this solution to opening a gift box.

2. My “teenage students” helped me write all the steps to wrap a gift.

3. “Students” conceptualized “variable” and “solve.”

4. We wrote all the steps to open the gift.

5. We “wrapped” a linear equation.

6. Using lessons learned in #4, we solved the equation.

Page 17: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

T&L _ Mathematics

Modeling

Micro-Teaching

Assessment

Page 18: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

Assessment

Posting YouTube was optional. However, 11

out of 14 students participated.

1.Analysis of the micro-teachings.

2.Students emulating my lesson.

Page 19: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

Analysis of the Lessons

• Identification of positive aspects of the lesson:

– Instructor: 9 comments.

– Peers: 39 comments.

• Constructive suggestions:

– Instructor: 21 comments.

– Peers: 15 comments.

Page 20: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

Students Emulating Instructor’s Lesson

• As if teaching “live” students: 8/9, 2 students had live students.

• Deliberatively complimenting students: 9/11

• Lessons based on real-life applications: 7/11

• Anticipating and accepting incorrect answers: 5/11.

• Starting the lesson as if it had nothing to do with math: 2/11.

Page 21: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

In one discussion a student indicated that, “Conceptual teaching is not a big deal, we are already doing it. I wonder why our host teachers don’t teach conceptually….”

Page 22: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

MAT Program

Teaching & Learning _ Structure

T&L _ Mathematics

T&L _ Science

T&L _ Social Studies

Conclusion

Page 23: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons
Page 24: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

Science Education: Last year’s pilot with YouTube

• Allowed the instructor to observe and assess science applications, lab examples, and use of science technologies

• But students (pre-service teachers) had difficult time shifting to student-centered, inquiry-based science – Most YouTube demo lessons focused on teacher

telling and demonstrating science and not engaging the students

Page 25: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons
Page 26: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

This year: team composition & effectiveness after the first YouTube

• 15 students; most teams comprised of 3 or more; generally work at a distance from each other

• Grouped mostly by content area (chemistry / physics had small #’s so they worked together)

• Results: teams w/ K12 experience were less effective in implementing inquiry, for example . . .

Earth sci Bio Chem Physics

# of teams 1 3 1 1

# in team 3 3/4 2 1

K12 schools? No Yes No No

Effective? Very Poor at 1st Modest Very

Page 27: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

Even with the initial inquiry discussions the initial YT’s were problematic

Page 28: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

T&L _ Science

Modeling

Micro-Teaching

Assessment

Page 29: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

Thus, the instructor modeled what wasn’t seen in the first lesson

using prompts on the screen to reinforce research-based ideas being conveyed

Page 30: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

Screen prompts & exhibited materials reinforced the use of inquiry & student

centered techniques

Page 31: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

The instructor YT’s even showed advanced ways to engage a classroom –such as, students design their

own survey and teacher critiques the survey

Page 32: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

The instructor also modeled the use of spreadsheets and a discussion about data with the K12 class that might ensue

Page 33: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

T&L _ Science

Modeling

Micro-Teaching

Assessment

Page 34: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

Assignment details

• Before the next two YouTubes were presented, the students had to review the instructor YT and answer questions that focused them on inquiry-based, student-centered techniques

• The assignment required that the YouTubes give evidence of specific approaches & techniques

• (Details on assessment later in the presentation)

Page 35: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

After viewing & discussing the model from instructor, the students (pre-service teachers) demonstrate better engagement with future

K12 students & the tech that will be used

Page 36: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons
Page 37: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons
Page 38: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons
Page 39: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons
Page 40: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons
Page 41: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

T&L _ Science

Modeling

Micro-Teaching

Assessment

Page 42: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

Assessment details (science)

• The assignment required that the YouTubes give evidence of specific approaches & techniques

• A justification of the YT created had to be included from the textbook & literature

• What follows is: the assignment; the justification table; and the assessment rubric

Page 43: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

Assignment for the data probe YT

Page 44: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

Justification Table

Page 45: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

Science Rubric – assess on YT & on the justification

Page 46: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

YouTube demonstrates (and thus allows assessment of) multiple

competencies

• The science lesson & student engagement• The preservice teachers use of technology • The questioning techniques the preservice

teacher is using with the hypothetical audience – In the previous pilot, the preservice teachers had

more difficulty with student-centered teaching

Page 47: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

Overall• Pleased the YouTube’s provided a way to evaluate

performance online, by a content expert faculty• YT’s more closely approximates teaching then a

lesson plan alone – lesson plans were still required• The modeling of research-based techniques, too

seldom seen in K12 (such as, inquiry), seemed to help students understand these approaches – as evident in their later YT’s

Page 48: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

MAT Program

Teaching & Learning Structure

T&L _ Mathematics

T&L _ Science

T&L _ Social Studies

Conclusion

Page 49: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

T&L _ Social Studies

Modeling

Micro-Teaching

Assessment

Page 50: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

Modeling for Microteaching of Social Studies

Page 51: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

Pre-Microteaching Process

• I model excerpt reading

• Students read & interpret excerpt

• I model microteaching

Page 52: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

Excerpt Reading

• Introduction to the essay or speech

• Reading of excerpt

• Interpretation

Page 53: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

Reflections on Excerpt Readings

• My model reading involved too long an excerpt.

• 30-second introduction, 5-minute reading, one-minute interpretation.

• Students made same mistake.

• Next time I will model reading of 3 minutes or less.

Page 54: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

Microteaching Rubric Criteria

• Aligning with objective(s)

• Experiential

• Inquiry-based

• Interactive

Page 55: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

Modeling Microteaching

• I read objective.

• Students imagine they would live somewhere with a different culture.

• Prepare interview questions for person of that culture; compare questions with partner.

• I introduce “Nine Universals of Culture.”

• Students compare questions to universals.

Page 56: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

Minimally Produced Video

• I held up papers to show text that would be on a screen.

• Used narration.

• Invited viewers to hit pause while brainstorming interview questions.

Page 57: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

What I’ll Change

• Make it more of an authentic simulation.

• Call on students, demonstrate wait-time.

• Try to move all narration to one place – introduction.

Page 58: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

T&L _ Social Studies

Modeling

Micro-Teaching

Assessment

Page 59: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

Students’ Microteachings for Social Studies

Page 60: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

General Observations

• Students emulated me with paper signs and narration breaks – some exceptions.

• Seemed more comfortable than with first video (excerpt reading.)

• Two of eleven taught with an audience of fellow pre-service teachers.

• Some tended to rely on lecture with discussion questions.

Page 61: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

What to Change

• Have students deliver microteaching with metacognition for experiential learning, inquiry, and interaction.– “I want to start with your experience.”– “I want to know what questions you have

before I go further with the lesson.”

• “Now I want you to discuss this new concept with a peer.”

Page 62: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

T&L _ Social Studies

Modeling

Micro-Teaching

Assessment

Page 63: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

Assessing Microteachings of Social Studies

Page 64: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

Peer Assessment

• Students assess each other’s YouTube and lesson plan based on the rubric in a threaded discussion.

• Required to assess at least at least two peers.

• No second peer assessment for anyone until all others have at least one.

Page 65: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

Observations on Peer Assessment

• Followed the rubric to varying degrees.

• Some received several, others only one.

• General reluctance to be critical.

Page 66: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

Changes to Peer Assessment

• Have students participate in making rubric.

• Require score and comment for each rubric category.

• Assign students randomly to groups in order to equalize number of assessments received.

Page 67: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

My Assessment

• Used rubric to assess YouTube and lesson plan in assignment drop box.

• Invited students to improve on lesson plan after giving feedback.

Page 68: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

Reflections on My Assessment

• YouTube greatly enhanced my overall assessment of students’ work.

• I could see each student as a unique person and not just as one of my eleven students.

• The video allowed me to have visual and audio evidence that the social studies lesson on paper is delivered with skillful teaching.

Page 69: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

Changes for My Assessment

• Will look for cues in the video that the student is mindful of explicit provisions for experiential learning, inquiry, and interaction.

• Will give students option for a second microteaching, which would not be graded.

Page 70: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

MAT Program

Teaching & Learning Structure

T&L _ Mathematics

T&L _ Science

T&L _ Social Studies

Conclusion

Page 71: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

aB Z

Overall – All Faculty Perspective• Although our approaches were different, we all

had a need to observe students efforts and to bring new approaches to teaching; in general: – We were able to know our students better – We were able to model techniques and see students

learn from observing us – We will continue to work with and improve our

efforts with using shared videos (YouTubes) in our online classes

Page 72: CIT 2011 - Three Faculty reflect on YouTube for lessons

42510011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

a

B

Z

Can YouTube Help Teacher Education?

Abendroth, Ed.D. [email protected]

Golzy, Ph.D. [email protected]

O’Connor, Ph.D. [email protected]

Empire State College

CIT 2011, Oneonta, NY


Top Related