1
Improving the Operation of Warehouse Cold-Storage Areas
Client: North Texas Food Bank
Senior Design 2010
Nafees AhmedPrajyot Bangera
Shahrzad RahimianPablo De Santiago
May 10, 2010“Passionately pursuing a hunger-free community”
2
Client BackgroundNTFB was established in 1982 to deal with
the critical issue of hunger in the North Texas area
They provided over 400,000 meals during their first year of operations; Last year, over 37 million meals distributed
Currently, their goal is to reach 50 million meals distributed by 2011
Their vision is to see a hunger-free world
3
Management SummaryMet with Director of Operations, Sean Gray, and toured the
facility
It was determined that the best area of focus for us would be determining bottlenecks as to why the freezer and cooler operations were not as efficient as they could possibly be
ObservationsObserved how cold food comes to NTFB, is stored, sorted,
ordered, and delivered to agenciesData collection – online inventories and ordering system
Determined main metric to measure improvement would be time
Used a simulation to model the system and determine recommendations
5
Problem DescriptionConcerns with the freezer/cooler operations
Organization of items insideTime wasted looking for items or moving items
around to get to another item – this time could be better utilized
Optimizing usage of the limited spacePerhaps we could see a problem that was going
unnoticed in the operationsCooler/freezers items brought out once agency
physically shows up
Data CollectionOrganization – no tracking of cycle timePlenty of inventory data availableObservations and process timing
7
Situation AnalysisSpeak with operations and facilities managers
Concerns with freezers/coolerNew ideas for system improvements
Spoke to some agencies that come to pick up food
LayoutEast dock
Primarily assigned to NTFB trucks to deliver and pick-up items
Used to receive items in the afternoonWest dock
Primarily for agency pick-ups
8
Direct ObservationPictures and videos
taken, so we can track each process and time them as well
Interviews with truck drivers, forklift operators, front office management, and agencies provided different viewpoints to the sameproblems
9
Situation AnalysisConclusion of analysis
NTFB runs a very efficient operation
Recommendations would most likely be on small changes that will add up to an overall increased efficiency
Based on the concept of “kaizen” - Japanese for "improvement" or "change for the better“…focuses on constant, little improvements to a system to makeit run more smoothly
11
ProModelLocations are like
variablesSet constraints
through locationsSet times of
processes based on our direct observation data
12
ProModel Used expected values from historical data
NTFB’s online ordering system and inventory database; sign in sheets
Performed an A-B-C pareto analysis on the C/F inventory to determine realistic probabilities and values
13
Analysis of ResultsPossible to run thousands of simulations with different
scenarios
We chose to run 4 variations of our base line model with possible scenarios, and then a 5th variation with extremely ideal conditions and parameters, to be able to see how the results would vary
Since space within freezers and coolers is limited and is not something we can create, it is a constant in our model
Each model variation ran 10 times, over the course of 8 hours, using 15 minute time slots
Results were given as averages from the 10 simulation runs
14
Analysis of ResultsName
Scheduled Time (HR) Capacity Total Entries
Avg Time Per Entry (MIN) Avg Contents % Utilization
docks 8 35 34.3 6.99 0.50 1.42freezer1 8 30 9.1 168.57 3.18 10.61freezer2 8 30 8.8 141.25 2.70 8.99cooler 8 30 15.5 163.97 5.40 17.98
weighting point 1 8 1 33.8 4.54 0.31 31.50
weighting point 2 8 1 9.9 46.84 0.94 93.72
Delivery queue 8 1 8.9 51.31 0.92 92.12gate2 8 1 7.9 6.49 0.11 10.56
•Base-Line Model: Base-Line Model [45-55 min agency wait, 1 agency pick up dock, 1 queue line]
NameScheduled Time (HR) Capacity Total Entries
Avg Time Per Entry (MIN) Avg Contents % Utilization
docks 8 35 32.9 7.20 0.50 1.42
freezer1 8 30 8 149.97 2.49 8.30
freezer2 8 30 9.2 134.48 2.68 8.95
cooler 8 30 14.9 155.39 4.82 16.06
weighting point 1 8 1 32.5 4.11 0.27 27.38
weighting point 2 8 1 10.3 44.40 0.93 92.56
Delivery queue 8 1 9.3 50.19 0.94 93.53
gate2 8 2 8.3 5.96 0.10 5.13
•Scenario 1 [45-55 min agency wait, 2 agency pick up docks, 1 queue line]
15
Analysis of ResultsName
Scheduled Time (HR) Capacity Total Entries
Avg Time Per Entry (MIN) Avg Contents % Utilization
docks 8 35 34.9 7.38 0.54 1.56freezer1 8 30 10.2 100.13 2.18 7.26freezer2 8 30 7.6 94.99 1.76 5.86cooler 8 30 16.5 106.09 3.82 12.72
weighting point 1 8 1 34.6 3.86 0.28 27.99
weighting point 2 8 1 18.7 21.84 0.83 83.50
Delivery queue 8 2 17.7 47.97 1.73 86.67gate2 8 1 15.7 6.10 0.20 19.83
•Scenario 2 [45-55 min agency wait, 1 agency pick up docks, 2 queue lines]
NameScheduled Time (HR) Capacity Total Entries
Avg Time Per Entry (MIN) Avg Contents % Utilization
docks 8 35 33 7.25 0.50 1.42
freezer1 8 30 8.6 126.88 2.39 7.97
freezer2 8 30 8.4 120.45 2.21 7.35
cooler 8 30 15.3 124.70 4.18 13.93
weighting point1 8 1 32.5 4.00 0.27 27.24
weighting point 2 8 1 13.9 30.66 0.86 86.15
Delivery queue 8 1 12.9 34.91 0.91 91.17
gate2 8 1 11.9 6.19 0.15 15.50
•Scenario 4 [30-40 min agency wait, 1 agency pick up dock, 1 queue line]
16
Recommendations & Conclusion Simulation results showed that the main
problem/bottleneck lies with the agency waiting line, and once that problem can be eliminated, the process for the cooler/freezers will become more steady as well (due to items only coming out once agency arrives)
Add an extra shelf in the back corner of the cooler to utilize vertical space; will minimize time moving things around to get to item in back
Label designated areas within cooler/freezers Increase organization/decrease cycle time
Group items together
Look into possibility of opening another dock for P&W customers
Record cycle times of items
Recommend looking into other O.R. methods, like waiting line queuing theory to further optimize operations
By implementing some of these recommendations, we feel that it will really help the NTFB make their operations more efficient, and help them reach their goal of 50 million meals by 2011