COGNITIVE CONTROL OF BEHAVIOR
Chapter 11
1
Animal Cognition2
Aristotle
Born 384 BC
•Scala Naturae•God•Angels and Demons•Man•Wild Beasts•Domesticated Beasts•Plants•Minerals
Charles Darwin
Evolution by Natural Selection
Mental continuity between humans and animals.
1809-1882
Descent of Man
“Nevertheless the difference in mind between man and the higher animals, great as it is, certainly is one of degree and not of kind.”
4
Georges Romanes
1848-1894
Animal Intelligence (1888)
Relied heavily on anecdotes to buildan uncritical view of animal intelligence
Criteria for Mind:1. Not a reflex2. Individual Choice3. Report by a Reputable Person
5
Some Examples
Horses and inclined planes Earwig “Tim” comes to breakfast Cats and mechanical understanding Scorpions commit suicide Sympathetic ants
6
Excerpted from George Romanes' book Animal Intelligence (1888)
One day, watching a small column of these ants, I placed a little stone on one of them to secure it. The next that approached, as soon as it discovered its situation, ran backwards in an agitated manner, and soon communicated the intelligence to the others. They rushed to the rescue; some bit at the stone and tried to move it, others seized the prisoner by the legs and tugged with such force that I thought the legs would be pulled off, but they persevered until they got the captive free. This observation seems unequivocal as proving fellow-feeling and sympathy.
7
Ontogeny Recapitulates Phylogeny
8
Romanes Evolution of Intelligence
15 Months 12 Months 8 Months 4 Months 7 Weeks 3 Weeks
Morality Tool Use Understand Words Recognize People Similarity Contiguity
9
Caveat Emptor
Anthropomorphism: unthinkingly giving human qualities to animals, especially when the data are anecdotal
10
Teaching Signs to Washoe11
Edward Thorndike
Criticized Romanes’ views as unscientific.
1874-19494. Do not know history of the animal
Problems with anecdotes:
1. Only a single case is studied. Does it apply to whole species?
2. Observations are often not repeated or repeatable
3. Conditions under which observations are made are not well regulated
12
Lloyd Morgan and Tony
1852-1936
“Tony”
13
Morgan’s Canon
“In no case may we interpret an action as the outcome of the exercise of a higher psychical faculty, if it can be interpreted as the outcome of one which stands lower in the psychological scale.”
14
Caveat Emptor
Anthropomorphism: unthinkingly giving human qualities to animals
Equality of Condition: assumption that it is possible to truly equate test conditions, and thus place species on a scale
15
Speed of learning and intelligence
Are infants dumber than bees? Are bees smarter than rats?
16
Caveat Emptor
Anthropomorphism: unthinkingly giving human qualities to animals
Equality of Condition: assumption that it is possible to truly equate test conditions
Evolutionary Scale: assumption that living species are close genetic relatives, with organisms of lesser complexity having evolved into more complex ones.
17
Evolution of Intelligence18
Brain Size 19
Dumb and dumber20
Tree of life21
Caveat Emptor
Anthropomorphism: unthinkingly giving human qualities to animals
Equality of Condition: assumption that it is possible to truly equate test conditions
Evolutionary Scale: assumption that living species are close genetic relatives with organisms of lesser complexity having evolved into more complex ones.
Homology or analogy: Common genes or common environmental pressures?
23
Learned Helplessness Theory
Seligman – depression is learned. Depression occurs when people believe:
Failures are due to uncontrollable events. Failure will continue as long as events are
beyond their control. Depression arises from helplessness.
24
Animal Research
Step 1 -- three groups of dogs: Inescapable shock – no control. Escapable shock -- terminated if the dog
pressed a panel. No shock
Step 2 – 10 trials of signaled avoidance training in shuttle box.
2/3 of inescapable shock dogs did not learn to jump during step 2.
25
Characteristics of Helplessness
Motivational – unable to initiate voluntary behavior. Mice in water maze. Nonspecific – carries over to a variety tasks
and test situations. Learning– incapable of benefiting from
future experience – even if they jump, don’t learn.
Emotional– negative affect, ahedonia (sad)
26
Helplessness in Humans
Hiroto – three groups of college students: Uncontrollable group – wrongly told that
pushing button would end noise. Escapable group – pushing button ended
noise. Control – no noise.
Tested using finger shuttle box. Uncontrollable group did not escape
27
Cognition and helplessness It is important to appreciate that
although cognition is at the heart of Seligman's theory, learned helplessness affects other psychological processes
28
A Cognitive View Of Depression
29
Seligman believed that depression is learned
He proposed that depression occurs when people believe that they are helpless to control their own destinies
Studies of Depressives
Show similar results to learned helplessness studies.
Depressed individuals do not escape noise, responding like inescapable non-depressed individuals.
Depressed individuals do not adjust likelihood of succeeding upward when they experience success. They credit chance not skill.
30
Parallels (Symptoms)
Helplessness Response initiation
deficit Reinforcement
ineffective in changing behavior
Attentional shift (Turn Outward)
Emotionally passive Recall aversive Reduced Aggression Lose Weight Norepinephrine depletion Glutamate overactivity
Depression Unresponsive, slow Disrupted thinking,
negative expectations Attentional shift (Turn
Inward) Flat Ruminations Occasional Angry
Outbursts Anorexia Norepinephrine
depletion Glutamate overactivity
31
Parallels (Treatments)
Antidepressants ECT Forced escape Time
Antidepressant ECT Behavioral Efficacy
Treat Time
32
Criticisms of Seligman’s Theory
May be due to attributions, not everyone who experiences uncontrollable events becomes helpless.
Failure to replicate performance deficits in humans – facilitation of performance instead (Get Mad).
33
34
Depressed individuals attribute their success to external factors of luck and task ease
Depressed individuals attribute their failures to internal factors of lack of effort and ability
35
Non-depressed individuals attribute successes to internal factors and failures to external factors
Learned helplessness models cannot explain such observations
Attribution Theory
Causal attributions of failure have three dimensions: Internal-external – internal traits or
characteristics vs environmental forces Stable-unstable – past causes will persist vs
new forces will determine future outcomes Global-specific – outcome relates only to
one task vs outcome effects everything.
36
Attributional Model of Depression
Internal External
Dimension Stable Unstable Stable Unstable
Global I’m unattractive to all men
My conversation sometimes bores men
Men are overly competitive with intelligent women
Men get into rejecting moods
Specific I’m not his “type”
My conversation bored him
He’s overly competitive with women
He was in a rejecting mood
37
Severity of Depression
Depression can be transient if attributed to global but changing conditions.
Severe depression occurs when attributions are: Internal Global Stable
Unlikely if external, specific, unstable.
38
Two Kinds of Helplessness
Personal helplessness – an individual’s inability causes failure.
Universal helplessness – the environment is structured so that no one can control future events.
Abramson -- both kinds lead to depression. Vary on external-internal dimension. Low self-esteem only with personal.
39
40
Both personal and universal helplessness produce the expectation of an inability to control future events and a lack of an ability to initiate voluntary behavior, which are characteristic of depression Individuals who are personally depressed
make internal attributions for failure (MANY PEOPLE)
Individuals who are universally depressed make external attributions for failure (LIKE DOGS & RATS)
Severity of Depression41
Severe depression typically appears when a person attributes their failure to internal, global, and stable factors
The depression is intense because they perceive themselves as incompetent (internal) in many situations (global) and believe the incompetence is unlikely to change (stable)
Hopelessness Theory of Depression
42
The hopelessness theory suggests that attributional style AND/OR environmental circumstances together contribute to hopelessness
Hopelessness Depression
Hopelessness – the expectation that desired outcomes will not occur. Learned helplessness -- no control over
undesired outcomes. Accounts for anxiety without depression.
Anxiety – possibility that a person may have no control over negative events.
Depression occurs when certain.
43
Negative Life Events and Hopelessness
44
Hopelessness: The belief that negative events are inevitable Occurs when a negative life event is attributed
to stable and global factors Hopelessness Theory of Depression:
The view that whether a person becomes hopeless and depressed depends upon a person making a stable and global attribution for negative life events and the severity of those negative life events
A Negative Attributional Style and Vulnerability to Depression
45
Negative attributional style:A belief system that assumes that negative
life events are due to stable and global factors, which makes the person vulnerable to depression
A Positive Attributional Style and Hopelessness Depression
46
Positive attributional style:A belief system that negative life events
are controllable, which leads to hopefulness and a resilience to depression
Hopefulness:The belief that negative life events can be
controlled and are not inevitable