Download - ColaWar GroupD
![Page 1: ColaWar GroupD](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051108/546c279bb4af9f9b158b4eb7/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Cola Wars Continue:Coke and Pepsi in 2006
Presented by Group D
![Page 2: ColaWar GroupD](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051108/546c279bb4af9f9b158b4eb7/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Why, historically, has the soft drinks industry been so profitable?
QUESTION 1
![Page 3: ColaWar GroupD](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051108/546c279bb4af9f9b158b4eb7/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Porter’s Five Force Analysis
![Page 4: ColaWar GroupD](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051108/546c279bb4af9f9b158b4eb7/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Threat Of New Entrants - Low
• Concentrate manufacturing involves little capital investment
• Bottling – capital intensive• Access to distribution is limited• High brand loyalty
![Page 5: ColaWar GroupD](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051108/546c279bb4af9f9b158b4eb7/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Threat Of New Entrants
• Bottling Network - Have franchisee agreements with their existing
bottler’s who have rights in a certain geographic area in perpetuity.
- Backward integration with bottling companies.• Advertising Spend - Huge advertising and marketing spend required.
Around $450 million by Coke and Pepsi put together in 2004
![Page 6: ColaWar GroupD](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051108/546c279bb4af9f9b158b4eb7/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Bargaining Power Of Suppliers -Low
Commodity Ingredients• Concentrate Producers - Caramel coloring, phosphoric or citric acid,
natural flavors and caffeine• Inputs for Bottlers- Packaging- Sweeteners
![Page 7: ColaWar GroupD](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051108/546c279bb4af9f9b158b4eb7/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Bargaining Power Of Suppliers
• Majority of the U.S. Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs) were packed in metal cans (56%)
- Coke and Pepsi were among the largest customers for metal can industry
- Cans are commodity, 2-3 manufacturers competed for single contract
• Plastic Bottles represented 42% of CSD packaging - Bargaining power of plastic bottle suppliers was
low
![Page 8: ColaWar GroupD](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051108/546c279bb4af9f9b158b4eb7/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Bargaining Power Of Buyers- Moderate
31%
15%
9%4%
4%
3%
34%
Retail Channels
Supermarkets
Convenience stores/ Gas sta-tions
Supercenters
Mass retailers
Club stores
Drug Stores
Fountain ans Vending machines
![Page 9: ColaWar GroupD](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051108/546c279bb4af9f9b158b4eb7/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Bargaining Power Of Buyers
• Supermarkets- Several chain stores and few local supermarkets- Intense competition for shelf space - Offer premium shelf space thus command lower prices• Mass merchandiser- Extremely fragmented - Have private label CSDs • Fountain Account- Intense competition for these accounts- Sacrificed Profits to land and keep accounts
![Page 10: ColaWar GroupD](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051108/546c279bb4af9f9b158b4eb7/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Threat Of Substitutes - Low
• Large number of substitutes were available – bottled water, beer, milk, coffee, juice etc.
• Americans drank more soda than any other beverage with cola market share 71% in 1990
• Huge advertising, brand equity, and making easy availability of product reduced the threat of substitutes
![Page 11: ColaWar GroupD](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051108/546c279bb4af9f9b158b4eb7/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Extent Of Rivalry - High
• Concentrate Producer Industry – DUOPOLY• Rest of the competition too small to cause any
upheaval of pricing or industry structure• Strategic convergence • Head-to-Head Competition between both
Coke and Pepsi reinforced brandrecognition of each other.
![Page 12: ColaWar GroupD](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051108/546c279bb4af9f9b158b4eb7/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Conclusion
• Americans drank more soda than any other beverage
• Head-to-Head Competition between both Coke and Pepsi reinforced brandrecognition of each other.
• Since the Threat of New Entrant, Bargaining Power of Supplier, Threat of Substitutes were all low, the soft drink industry enjoyed high profitability
![Page 13: ColaWar GroupD](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051108/546c279bb4af9f9b158b4eb7/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Compare the economics of the concentrate business to that of the bottling business: why is the profitability so different?
QUESTION 2
![Page 14: ColaWar GroupD](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051108/546c279bb4af9f9b158b4eb7/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Concentrate Producers
• Blend raw material ingredients, packaged the mixture and shipped those to the container bottler.
• A typical manufacturing plan costs $25 million to $ 50 million.
• Significant costs were for advertising, promotion , market research and bottler relations.
• Coca-Cola and Pepsi claimed a combined 74.8% of the US CSD market sales.
• Concentrate producers earn more profit than bottlers.
![Page 15: ColaWar GroupD](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051108/546c279bb4af9f9b158b4eb7/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Bottlers
• Cost of sale is more in bottlers than concentrate producers.
• Added carbonated water and high-fructose corn syrup.
• Bottled or canned is the resulting CSD product.• Delivered it to customer account.• Bottling process is capital intensive.
![Page 16: ColaWar GroupD](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051108/546c279bb4af9f9b158b4eb7/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Operating Margins for Concentrate Producers & Bottlers
Concentrate ProducersCoca Cola Pepsi
Revenue 21719 8313Operating Profit 30.72% 23.00%
BottlersCCE PBG
Revenue 18158 10906Operating Profit 7.90% 9%
![Page 17: ColaWar GroupD](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051108/546c279bb4af9f9b158b4eb7/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Cost Structure Concentrate Producer Bottler
$ per case % of Sales $ per case % of Sales
Net sales 0.97 100 4.7 100
Cost of Sales 0.16 17 2.82 60
Gross Profit 0.81 83 1.88 40Selling and Delivery 0.02 2 1.18 25
Marketing 0.42 43 0.09 2General Administration 0.08 8 0.19 4
Pretax Profit 0.29 30 0.42 9
![Page 18: ColaWar GroupD](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051108/546c279bb4af9f9b158b4eb7/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Price ChangePrice Change from 1988-2004
Retail Price per case 0.60%
Concentrate Price per case 3.90%
CPI 3%
•Increasing price of concentrate has put pressure on the bottlers margins
![Page 19: ColaWar GroupD](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051108/546c279bb4af9f9b158b4eb7/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Conclusion
• Long Term Debts by Assets Ratio is as high as 40%.• Channel Shift due to Big Retailers like Wal-Mart lead
to pricing pressures• With increasing number of SKU’s ,the no of product
lines and the Labor costs of the Bottlers Increases• Non-CSG products required costly new equipment
and major process changes• Rising raw material costs
![Page 20: ColaWar GroupD](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051108/546c279bb4af9f9b158b4eb7/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
How has the competition between Coke and Pepsi affected the industry profits?
QUESTION 3
![Page 21: ColaWar GroupD](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051108/546c279bb4af9f9b158b4eb7/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Beverage Consumption / Person
1970 1975 1981 1985 1990 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2003 20040%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%Tapwater/Hybrids/All Others
Distilled Spirits
Wine
Powdered Drinks
Sports Drink
Tea
Juices
Coffee
Bottled Water
Milk
Beer
CSD
Need Creation
![Page 22: ColaWar GroupD](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051108/546c279bb4af9f9b158b4eb7/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Market Share
![Page 23: ColaWar GroupD](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051108/546c279bb4af9f9b158b4eb7/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Impact on Industry• Overall increase in industry reach
– Strong advertising– Diversification
• New Products• New Markets
• Price Pressures (1998-2004)– Concentration Price per case up by 3.9%– CPI up by 3%– Retail Price per case up by only 0.6% !
• Consolidation : moving towards Duopoly– Combined 50.8% market share in 1966 to 74.8% market share in 2004– No price war ?
![Page 24: ColaWar GroupD](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051108/546c279bb4af9f9b158b4eb7/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Conclusion
• Overall Industry Volume is increasing– 3090 Mn in 1970 to 10240 Mn in 2004
• Per unit profits declined due to price war• New products and markets• Innovation– Glass bottles in India : Low Cost– Vending Machines : High Margin
• Net Profit/Sales for 2 dominant players increasing continuously : Industry doing well
![Page 25: ColaWar GroupD](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051108/546c279bb4af9f9b158b4eb7/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Can Coke and Pepsi sustain their profits in the wake of flattening demand and growing popularity of non-CSD’s?
QUESTION 4
![Page 26: ColaWar GroupD](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051108/546c279bb4af9f9b158b4eb7/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
• CSD still accounts for the largest share in total liquid consumption• Coke and Pepsi CSD accounts for 55.4% of the market share in the Non-Alcoholic Refreshment Beverage
Industry• Coke and Pepsi are in the business since 1890’s – High Brand Equity• No other dominant player due to high barriers to entry• Both figure in the “Brands Most Important to Retailers List “• Product Differentiation
CSD MILK Bottled Water
Coffee Juices Tea Sports Drink
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Consumption(gl/capita) 1998
CSD MILK Bottled Water
Coffee Juices Tea Sports Drink
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Consumption2004
![Page 27: ColaWar GroupD](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051108/546c279bb4af9f9b158b4eb7/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
• Globalization : International Market• International Retail Market Not consolidated as US/Europe• Provide Coke and Pepsi better pricing power• Emerging Markets in BRIC and Developing countries
Population Consump Total Growth
USA 290809 837 243407133 -1.1
CHINA 1304196 21 27388116 1.2
INDIA 1065462 8 8523696 7.5
RUSSIA 143246 70 10027220 7.7
BRAZIL 178470 312 55682640 3.1
![Page 28: ColaWar GroupD](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051108/546c279bb4af9f9b158b4eb7/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
• Innovation• Diversification• Refrain from eroding each others market share• Maintain duopoly industry landscape
![Page 29: ColaWar GroupD](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051108/546c279bb4af9f9b158b4eb7/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 20090
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
EPS
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 20090
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
Sales
Sales and EPS of Coke has increased in last decadeSimilar trend for Pepsi
![Page 30: ColaWar GroupD](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051108/546c279bb4af9f9b158b4eb7/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
THANK YOU