![Page 1: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and
Assessment
Paul S. Appelbaum, MDDollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine &
LawDirector, Division of Psychiatry, Law &
EthicsDepartment of Psychiatry
Columbia University
![Page 2: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
History of Concern with Research Ethics
Birth of research ethics often traced back to Nazi atrocities and the Nuremberg trials after WW II.
But even before then investigators seem to have recognized the importance of subjects’ competent consent to research.
1st known consent form: Walter Reed’s yellow fever experiments in Cuba (1898).
![Page 3: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Example of Early Recognition of Importance of Consent to
Research
Just over 100 years ago, George Bernard Shaw was writing Pygmalion (later My Fair Lady).
Consider this dialogue that occurs just as Prof. Henry Higgins is about to begin his experiment of turning the flower-girl, Eliza Doolittle into a “lady.”
![Page 4: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Col. Pickering: Excuse me, Higgins; but I really must interfere… If this girl is to put herself in your hands for six months for an experiment in teaching, she must understand thoroughly what she’s doing.
![Page 5: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Prof. Higgins:How can she? She’s incapable of understanding anything. Besides, do any of us understand what we are doing? If we did, would we ever do it?
![Page 6: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Col. Pickering:Very clever, Higgins, but not sound sense.
![Page 7: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Prof. Higgins:No use explaining. As a military man, you ought to know that. Give her her orders: that’s what she wants.
![Page 8: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Nature of the StudyEliza: You are to live here for the next six
months, learning how to speak beautifully, like a lady in a florist’s shop. If you’re good and do whatever you’re told, you shall sleep in a proper bedroom, and have lots to eat, and money to buy chocolates and take rides in taxis. If you’re naughty and idle, you will sleep in the back kitchen among the black beetles, and be walloped by Mrs. Pearce with a broomstick.
![Page 9: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Risks
At the end of six months, you shall go to Buckingham Palace in a carriage, beautifully dressed. If the King finds out you’re not a lady, you will be taken by the police to the Tower of London, where your head will be cut off as a warning to other presumptuous flower girls.
![Page 10: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Benefits
If you are not found out, you shall have a present of seven-and-sixpence to start life with as a lady in a shop.
![Page 11: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Right to Withhold Consent
If you refuse this offer, you will be a most ungrateful and wicked girl and the angels will weep for you.
Now are you satisfied, Pickering?
![Page 12: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Doctrine of Informed Consent Three elements:
Disclosure – Pickering’s concern Competence – Higgins’ focus and
our topic today Voluntariness – Liza’s bottom line Liza: You’re a big bully you are. I won’t
stay here if I don’t like. I won’t let nobody wallop me.
![Page 13: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Role of Competence Requirement
Right to make decisions is key value in liberal societies
But balanced against concern that some people lack capacity to make decisions consistent with their interests
Hence, informed consent doctrine creates exception for persons lacking competence
![Page 14: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Core Characteristics of Competence
Task specific – Can be competent for some decisions, but not others (e.g., focal delusions).
Time specific – May be competent at one point but not earlier or later.
Responsive to demand characteristics of decision – Riskier decisions may require higher level of capacity.
![Page 15: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Criteria for Competence to Consent to Research
Evidencing a choice Understanding disclosure of
information Appreciation of the nature of the
situation and its consequences Reasoning (ability to weigh risks
and benefits)
![Page 16: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
What is Different About Competence to Consent to
Research and to Treatment?
Subjects must appreciate the differences between the two contexts.
Treatment:Primary goal is the provision of “personal care.”
Research:Primary goal is the production
of generalizable knowledge.
![Page 17: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Research Methods that Favor Validity Over Patients’ Interests
Random assignment to treatment Placebos Double blind procedures Adherence to protocol to determine
dosages Limitations on adjunctive treatments
![Page 18: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Subject #50Interviewer: Do you know how treatment in this study
is different from ordinary care? Did they say what your treatment would be if you weren’t in the study?
Subject: No, no.
Interviewer: They didn’t discuss what the treatment would be?
Subject: No, no, I’ll leave that up to them. I want them to give me the best treatment for what I have.
Interviewer: Do you think by being in the study this is the best treatment you could get?
[continued]
![Page 19: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Subject #50[continued]
Subject: Okay, if they don’t, then I’ll drop out.Interviewer: Hopefully they will give you the best
treatment you can get?Subject: Right, right.Interviewer: So you are not sure they have different
groups or anything? As far as you know if they did have different groups, would the doctors decide which is the best one for you?
Subject: I would assume he would decide which one was the best one for me.
![Page 20: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Therapeutic Misconception Study: Participants
243 participants from 44 clinical research studies at 2 academic medical centers
Age (mean) 53.1 years (range 18-32) Gender (female) 69.8% Race (white) 90.5% Education (mean) 14.2 years
![Page 21: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Therapeutic Misconception Study: Dependent Variables
Incorrect belief that participant’s individualized needs would determine assignment to treatment conditions or lead to modification of the treatment regimen (Individualization)
Unreasonable belief about the nature or likelihood of medical benefit based on misunderstanding of research design (Benefit)
![Page 22: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Therapeutic Misconception Study: Frequency of TM (n=243)
Individualization 31.1% (n=70)Benefit 51.1% (n=115)
Total 61.8% (n=139)
![Page 23: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Role of Therapeutic Misconception in Impairing
Competence
Subjects who don’t appreciate the differences between research and treatment contexts can’t make meaningful decisions about participation
Therapeutic misconception is highly prevalent among potential research subjects and needs to be considered in competence evaluation
![Page 24: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
How Competent are Research Subjects with Conditions That
May Impair Capacity?
Data available on subjects with schizophrenia, depression, Alzheimer’s disease
Most studies use MacCAT-CR; many compare with normal populations
Both hypothetical and in vivo studies
![Page 25: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Diagnosis and Competence
Performance on competence measures: normals > depression > schizophrenia > Alzheimer’s disease.
![Page 26: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Schizophrenics vs. Normals
Pre-test MeansNormal
Schizophrenia Comparison Subjects (n=24) Group (n=24) P
Understanding (0-26) 12.9 (8.5) 20.2 (3.8) 0.001Reasoning (0-8) 3.5 (2.8) 5.5 (1.4) 0.002Appreciation (0-6) 2.3 (2.0) 4.4 (1.5) 0.0001Choice (0-2) 1.6 (0.7) 1.9 (0.3) 0.06
Carpenter, et al. Arch Gen Psychiatry 57: 533-8, 2000
![Page 27: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Correlates of Impaired Competence
Positive and negative psychotic symptoms have weak or no correlations with performance on competence measures.
Neuropsychological variables consistently show the strongest correlations with impairment
![Page 28: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Cognitive Impairment and Competence
![Page 29: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Effectiveness of Remedial Interventions Puzzle of Carpenter, et al. data Many subjects with impaired capacity
respond well to additional education Special teaching techniques may be
helpful (e.g., multimedia) After intervention, many subjects able
to make decisions for themselves
![Page 30: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Example of Effects of Additional Education
Pre Post PUnderstanding (0-26) 8.35 18.35
<0.00001Appreciation (0-6) 1.35 3.25
<0.0001
Reasoning (0-8) 2.35 3.7 <0.04
![Page 31: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Many Patients with Psychiatric or Neurologic Disorders Are Competent to Consent to
Research
There is great heterogeneity within diagnostic categories, but many persons in every diagnostic category (fewest in AD) retain decisional competence.
Proportions of competent patients will vary depending on diagnosis, clinical state, and nature of research study.
![Page 32: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Data from CATIE Study - 1 Kim (2003) had 3 psychiatrists
assess competence of sample of schizophrenic subjects and compared with MacCAT-CR scores
Cut-offs were established using ROC analyses.
![Page 33: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Data from CATIE Study - 2 Of 900 subjects in preliminary analysis,
approximate % falling below cut-offs were: Understanding: 9% Appreciation: 16% Reasoning: 24%
Conclusion: vast majority of chronic schizophrenic subjects in this study are competent to consent—but not all
![Page 34: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Approaches to Impaired Capacity
Screening increasingly prevalent in higher risk studies (e.g., placebo-controlled)
Can be done with: Clinical interview Symptom measures (e.g., MMSE, BPRS) Competence screening instruments
(e.g., MacCAT-CR)
![Page 35: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
MacCAT-CR Overview Assesses understanding,
appreciation, reasoning, and choice Series of disclosures followed by
questions and reasoning tasks Takes approximately 20-25 minutes Provides quantitative scores, but
not competent/incompetent decision
![Page 36: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
MacCAT-CR UnderstandingMacCAT-CR DisclosureU-1 (ii) Disclosure (Procedures of Project)—
Patients who agree to be in this study will do the following things:
- First, they will stop all medications for schizophrenia for 2 weeks; this is called the washout period- Second, after the washout period, they will receive either the new medication or the old medication for 8 weeks; this is called the treatment phase of the study- Altogether, the study lasts 10 weeks; 2-week washout and an 8-week treatment phase
![Page 37: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
MacCAT-CR UnderstandingMacCAT-CR Questions “Do you have any questions about what I
just said?” “Can you tell me your understanding of
what I just said?” If subject fails to mention spontaneously,
ask “How long will the research study last?” “What will happen to your medication at the beginning of the study?” “ What medication will your receive in the
study?”
![Page 38: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Understanding - Scoring 2 Subject recalls content of item and
offers fairly clear version. 1 Subject shows some recollection of
item content, but describes in a way that renders understanding uncertain, even after efforts to clarify
0 Subject does not recall, is clearly inaccurate, or seriously distorts meaning
![Page 39: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
MacCAT-CR Appreciation A-1 – “Do you believe that you
have been asked to be in this study primarily for your personal benefit?”
Then ask: “What makes you believe that this (was/wasn’t) the reason you were asked?”
![Page 40: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Appreciation - Scoring 2 Subject acknowledges being
recruited for reason unrelated to personal benefit
1 Subject says recruited both for and not for personal benefit; or for personal benefit with plausible reason
0 Subjects maintains being recruited only for personal benefit
![Page 41: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
MacCAT-CR - Choice “As you know, you have been
invited to participate in a research project testing a new medication for the treatment of schizophrenia. Do you think you are more likely to want to participate or not to want to participate?”
![Page 42: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Choice - Scoring 2 Subject states a choice
1 Subject states more than one choice, seems ambivalent
0 Subject does not state a choice
![Page 43: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
MacCAT-CR Reasoning R1/R2 - “You think that you are more
likely to want (to participate/not to participate) in the study. Tell me what it is that makes that option better than the other.”
Probe to explore reasoning process.
![Page 44: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Reasoning – Scoring(Consequential Reasoning)
2 Subject mentions at least 2 specific consequences
1 Subject mentions only 1 specific consequence
0 Subject mentions no specific consequences, even after direct probe
![Page 45: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Use of Screening Instruments Thresholds can be set based on
data from similar populations or a priori judgments
Failure can trigger clinical evaluation and/or remediation
Retesting after remediation allows participation for those able to improve performance
![Page 46: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Who Should Do the Screening?
NBAC (1999) suggested independent evaluation
But use of objective measures may allow clear documentation of decisions and obviate the need for outside assessor
![Page 47: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
What If Impairment is Detected?
Presence of impairment doesn’t imply subject should be excluded from study
Proper response is remediation, e.g., Repetition of disclosure Videotape/computer programs Group discussions with former subjects
Still likely that some subjects will have to be excluded, unless someone else can make decision
![Page 48: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Use of Proxy Decision Makers Status unclear in US
Federal rules allow “legally authorized representative”
But case law suggests usual proxies in treatment settings (e.g., family members, guardians) may not be authorized to consent to research
However, without proxy consent, some disorders will never be understood (e.g., AD)
![Page 49: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
NBAC Recommendations for Use of Proxies
NBAC suggested use of proxies in minimal risk research, or more than minimal risk but with some prospect of benefit (e.g., treatment trials)
But this would disallow proxies in studies seeking understanding of pathophysiology (e.g., PET studies, indwelling catheters)
![Page 50: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Reasonable Approach to Proxies
Permit persons authorized to consent for medical treatment to consent to research, so long as some prospect of benefit or risk represents no more than minor increment over minimal.
![Page 51: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
A New Kind of Proxy: The Subject Advocate - 1
Persons with mental illness often experience fluctuations in mental state
Though competent at the time of enrollment, they may become incompetent and unable to make decisions about withdrawal from the study later on
![Page 52: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
A New Kind of Proxy: The Subject Advocate - 2
CATIE used a subject advocate, appointed at time of consent
Person assists with enrollment decision Remains available to become involved if
subject becomes incompetent At that point, considers whether
risk/benefit ratio has so changed that subject should be withdrawn from the study
![Page 53: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Use of Advance Directives Again, status generally unclear in
US Not mentioned in federal rules Most statutes allowing advance
directives for treatment make no mention of research
![Page 54: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
NBAC Recommendations for Use of Advance
Directives NBAC endorsed advance directives, but
only if subject gave authorization to a class of research after risk, potential benefits, and other pertinent information explained
Unlikely that it will be possible to specify this information in advance for most subjects, hence not a practical approach
![Page 55: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Reasonable Approach to Advance Directives
Competent subjects should be able to agree in advance to enter any IRB-approved studies on their disorders, even without prospect of personal benefit
Or they may set limits of extent of risk, or defer to proxy decision maker
![Page 56: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Conclusions - 1 Psychiatric or neurologic illness
may lead to decisional impairment, but is neither a necessary nor sufficient condition for incompetence
Screening for incompetence is reasonable in higher risk studies with more impaired populations
![Page 57: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Conclusions - 2 Before incapable subjects are
excluded from participation, efforts should generally be made to remediate their impairments
But not every potential subject will respond to remediation
![Page 58: Competence to Consent to Research: Concepts and Assessment Paul S. Appelbaum, MD Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine & Law Director, Division of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062308/56649ec55503460f94bd0b84/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Conclusions - 3 Use of proxy decision makers and
advance directives hold promise for allowing research to proceed on important conditions while protecting subjects’ rights