Comprehensive Africa
Agriculture Development
Programme (CAADP) and
M&E**
Greenwell Matchaya, PhD
Ph
oto
: D
avid
Bra
zie
r/IW
MI
Ph
oto
:T
om
va
n C
ake
nb
erg
he
/IW
MI
Ph
oto
: D
avid
Bra
zie
r/IW
MI
www.iwmi.org
Water for a food-secure world
Greenwell Matchaya, PhD
ReSAKSS-SA Coordinator
July 4th, 2014
Antananarivo, Madagascar**with guidance from NPCA and ReSAKSS
• Stands for the comprehensive African Agricultural Development program
• It is a political response to the problems of poverty and food insecurity in Africa.
• The NEPAD in 2001 and CAADP in 2003 emerged as continental
CAADP
www.iwmi.org
Water for a food-secure world
• The NEPAD in 2001 and CAADP in 2003 emerged as continental development policy frameworks
• CAADP is a strategic framework to guide investments across four specific pillars, as well as investments in strengthening institutional capacity across the pillars in the sector
• These investments would then reverse the agricultural stagnation
Goal of CAADP
• Help African countries reach and maintain a higher path ofeconomic growth through agriculturally-led developmentthat reduces mass poverty, food insecurity and hunger.
Targets of CAADP
• Allocating 10% of national budgets to agriculture
Goals and Targets of CAADP
www.iwmi.org
Water for a food-secure world
• Allocating 10% of national budgets to agriculture
• 6% average annual growth in the agriculture
• MDG 1 - reduce poverty and hunger by half by 2015,
CAADP implementation
Has four pillars• Pillar 1: Extending the area under sustainable land
management and reliable water control systems
• Pillar 2: Improving rural infrastructure and trade related capacities for market access
www.iwmi.org
Water for a food-secure world
related capacities for market access
• Pillar 3: Increasing food supply, reducing hunger and improving responses to food emergency crises; and
• Pillar 4: Improving agriculture research, technology dissemination and adoption.
Pillar Institutions
NPCA
Implementation and coordination
AUC
political leadership
CAADP Stakeholders
Continental level
www.iwmi.org
Water for a food-secure world
CAADP Country team + DPs
Nationale Governments – Reform and review of existing policies to achieve MDGs, development of Investment plans
RECs
coordination of CAADP , regional integration
technical expertiseRegional level
National level
Lessons over 10 years • Inclusiveness and negotiating across various interests -
an essential factor in driving policy implementation• The 10%, 6% targets are still valid today as they were in
2003• Countries are looking for answers as to HOW they can
achieve growth in agriculture and reduce poverty
www.iwmi.org
Water for a food-secure world
• The past also shows that growth without development is possible unless inclusive policies are in place
• CAADP places a higher premium on knowledge, data and analysis and capacity building to support NAIPS
• The 10 percent spending is not enough if we don’t talk of quality of spending
M&E- Major lessons / shifts
From To
One focal point to drive
CAADP in the countries
A CAADP Country team to manage
the process strategically and
professionally
Facilitation through RECs
and consultants
Facilitation through a CAADP
Resource Group, composed of
RECs, AUC, Nepad, Pillars
Compact as a major focus Focus on impact and outcomes of Compact as a major focus
of the CAADP process
Focus on impact and outcomes of
the process, negotiated with the
countries leading to improved
performance and capacities to
reach 6 % growth
Primary focus on
government
in implementation
Focus on collective responsibility by
govt, civil society, private sector and
other actors
Capacity and institutional
arrangements and implementation
modalities are part of planning
Major lessons / shifts
From To
Implementation driven by
‘directives’ of higher levels
Implementation driven by value
addition
Exploring value addition by CAADP
with the countries and design
implementation accordingly
Mechanical and rather
static process
Dynamic and systemic process,
focusing on organisational
development, implementation development, implementation
capacity and quality strategic
process design & management and
continuous learning
Use of ‘isolated
consultants’
Use of the knowledge systems and
institutions to build fundamental
relationships, arrangements and
capacities which link planning to
knowledge, information and
networks (‘Building functioning
systems’)
Major lessons / shifts
From To
Process funded through
isolated donor support for
country implementation
Workplan-based funding from
MDTF and other sources
Limited analytical work to
economic modelling by
consultants
Comprehensive analytical work
through knowledge & information
support system (pillars and
knowledge centers)
Initial engagement process
with government at
different levels
Intensive engagement process with
government, stakeholders and the
public for ownership, leadership
and accountability of the process
Main focus on investment
priorities
Focus on improving national
development strategies and
programs through review of
existing strategies and
plans/programmes
Pro
gre
ss in C
en
tral A
frica, 2
00
3-1
0
0 5
10
15
Burundi
Cameroon
Central
African Rep.
Chad
Congo, Dem.
Congo, Rep.
Equatorial
Guinea
Sao Tome &
Principe
PercentC
en
tral A
frica
•S
ha
res in
crea
sed
in B
uru
nd
i, Re
p o
f Co
ng
o, a
nd
Sã
o To
mé
a
nd
Prin
cipe
•S
ha
res d
eclin
ed
or sta
gn
ate
d in
oth
er co
un
tries, w
hich
a
lso sp
en
d le
ss tha
n 5
%
Burundi
Cameroon
Central
African Rep.
Chad
Congo, Dem.
Rep.
Congo, Rep.
Equatorial
Guinea
Sao Tome &
Principe
Progress in East Africa , 2003-10
0
5
10
15
20
25
Dji
bo
uti
Eth
iop
ia
Ke
nya
Ma
da
ga
sca
r
Ma
uri
tiu
s
Rw
an
da
Se
ych
ell
es
So
uth
Su
da
n
Su
da
n
Tan
zan
ia
Ug
an
da
Pe
rce
nt
East Africa
• Many countries in East Africa spend 5-10% percent of total expenditure on agriculture
• Shares have increased over time in several countries (especially Ethiopia, Rwanda, Sudan)
Dji
bo
uti
Eth
iop
ia
Ke
nya
Ma
da
ga
sca
r
Ma
uri
tiu
s
Rw
an
da
Se
ych
ell
es
So
uth
Su
da
n
Su
da
n
Tan
zan
ia
Ug
an
da
0
5
10
15
Alg
eri
a
Eg
yp
t
Ma
uri
tan
ia
Mo
rocc
o
Tun
isia
Pe
rce
nt
North Africa
Progress in North Africa , 2003-10
• Shares have stagnated in Mauritania and diverged
downwards from the 10% target in the other
countries
Alg
eri
a
Eg
yp
t
Ma
uri
tan
ia
Mo
rocc
o
Tun
isia
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
An
go
la
Bo
tsw
an
a
Leso
tho
Ma
law
i
Mo
zam
biq
ue
Na
mib
ia
So
uth
Afr
ica
Sw
azi
lan
d
Za
mb
ia
Zim
ba
bw
e
Pe
rce
nt
Southern
Africa
Progress in Southern Africa , 2003-10
• Malawi is outstanding performer, with nearly three times the target in recent years
• Apart from Zambia, shares have stagnated or declined in the other countries
An
go
la
Bo
tsw
an
a
Leso
tho
Ma
law
i
Mo
zam
biq
ue
Na
mib
ia
So
uth
Afr
ica
Sw
azi
lan
d
Za
mb
ia
Zim
ba
bw
e
05
10152025
Bu
rkin
a F
aso
Ca
pe
Ve
rde
Co
te d
'Ivo
ire
Ga
mb
ia
Gh
an
a
Gu
ine
a
Gu
ine
a-…
Lib
eri
a
Ma
li
Nig
er
Nig
eri
a
Se
ne
ga
l
Sie
rra
Le
on
e
Tog
o
Pe
rce
nt
West Africa
Progress in West Africa , 2003-10
• Region where many countries have achieved target
• Shares have increased in many countries
• Burkina Faso and Mali (and Niger in recent years) have
consistently cut back on the shares towards the target level
Bu
rkin
a F
aso
Ca
pe
Ve
rde
Co
te d
'Ivo
ire
Ga
mb
ia
Gh
an
a
Gu
ine
a
Gu
ine
a
Lib
eri
a
Ma
li
Nig
er
Nig
eri
a
Se
ne
ga
l
Sie
rra
Le
on
e
Tog
o