COURTS AND SOCIAL CHANGEFall 2011 – LSTU E-107
Dr. Akiba J. Covitz
Associate DeanHarvard Law School
CLASS 6October 20, 2011
Harvard LSTU E-107 - Fall '11 Class 6 - © Akiba J. Covitz 2011
2
Move to Chapter 9:Appellate Courts: Policy and Impact
• Have been focused on process in Ch. 8; now move to policy and impact
• Appellate court opinions have 2 key components
1. How lower courts treated the parties
2. The appellate court’s judgment about how the principles of law as the appellate courts sees them are applicable to that case– It is in this second role that appellate courts have a
public policy impact
Harvard LSTU E-107 - Fall '11 Class 6 - © Akiba J. Covitz 2011
3
Chapter 9:Appellate Courts: Policy and Impact
• Ideological patterns in appellate court policy
– Republican v. Democrat?
– Liberal v. Conservative?
– Appellate courts have been “conservative” for much of US history• Appointees are white and rich• Favor their self-interest
Harvard LSTU E-107 - Fall '11 Class 6 - © Akiba J. Covitz 2011
4
Chapter 9:Appellate Courts: Policy and Impact
• Ideological patterns in appellate court policy
– Appellate courts have been “conservative” for much of US history
• Appointees are white and rich• Favor their self-interest• The best lawyers went to work for big companies;
– Brandeis changes• Really changes with New Deal (“do good and do well”)• Consolidated in 1960s and early 70s (yearbook)• Some clawing back in early 70s
– Bork, Pollak, and YLS– Nixon’s appointees
Harvard LSTU E-107 - Fall '11 Class 6 - © Akiba J. Covitz 2011
5
Chapter 9:Appellate Courts: Policy and Impact
• What is “judicial activism”?– Courts do make public policy– But appellate courts have the choice to act
or not to act– Basic definition: intervention into policies
made by the other branches– Striking down statutes as unconstitutional – They can give – or not give – very detailed
instructions to other branches
Harvard LSTU E-107 - Fall '11 Class 6 - © Akiba J. Covitz 2011
6
Chapter 9:Appellate Courts: Policy and Impact
• What is “judicial activism”?– How to measure how activist a court is:
• How many laws a court determines to be unconstitutional?• Going beyond what is needed to settle a case (Dred S.)?• The numbers of laws declared un-con-al has increased in
recent years (but still a tiny fraction of total laws passed) • Why more than in the past?• “Initiative” process• Circular: greater role for courts → society responds →
more cases come to courts → better briefs → more certs granted
• More gov’t acts to be declared un-con-al
Harvard LSTU E-107 - Fall '11 Class 6 - © Akiba J. Covitz 2011
7
Chapter 9:Appellate Courts: Policy and Impact
• What is “judicial activism”?– How to measure how activist a court is:
• Was Roe v. Wade activist?• Brown v. Board?• Dred Scott?• Gay marriage decisions?• Affirmative action decisions?
Harvard LSTU E-107 - Fall '11 Class 6 - © Akiba J. Covitz 2011
8
Chapter 9:Appellate Courts: Policy and Impact
• The impact of appellate courts– Implementation
• An appellate court’s impact depends at least in part on responses to its decisions by lower courts and administrators
• A court rules on a legal issue, others must then apply that rule (police departments, school systems, executive branch agencies, Congress, state legislatures)
• Resistance?; prayer, Bibles in public schools• Brown?
Harvard LSTU E-107 - Fall '11 Class 6 - © Akiba J. Covitz 2011
9
Chapter 9:Appellate Courts: Policy and Impact
• The impact of appellate courts– Implementation
• Brown – Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals follows the Brown
decisions carefully– But district judges, who had to apply the law in specific
cases, often allowed delays on the ground– Many school administrators and other public officials
simply refused to follow the decision– “You’re not the boss of me”
Harvard LSTU E-107 - Fall '11 Class 6 - © Akiba J. Covitz 2011
10
Chapter 9:Appellate Courts: Policy and Impact
• The impact of appellate courts– Implementation
• Brown II – “with All deliberate speed”– Result: public schools in the Deep South remained almost as
segregated in 1964 as they were 10 years earlier– It was only after Congress and the Executive Branch
intervened, through military means and by providing financial assistance, that desegregation began
– In border states, school districts gradually desegregated– Resistance continued in the south into the 70s and 80s
» Narrowest possible compliance– School districts in the north generally follow Brown and the
courts
Harvard LSTU E-107 - Fall '11 Class 6 - © Akiba J. Covitz 2011
11
Chapter 9:Appellate Courts: Policy and Impact
• The sanctions courts can impose– Weak (no army)– SCOTUS cannot fire a district judge who
refuses to follow its decisions– But the higher courts can continue to
reverse lower court rulings– Judges can be disobedient and not then be
whacked on the nose– Case has to be appealed to be reviewed
Harvard LSTU E-107 - Fall '11 Class 6 - © Akiba J. Covitz 2011
12
Chapter 9:Appellate Courts: Policy and Impact
• The sanctions courts can impose– For school officials, the biggest concern is lawsuits
• But in desegregation, local racist parents who happened to be lawyers often offered services free of charge
– Cops not always impacted by court’s anger• Police not worried about convictions• More worried about arrests• Leave convictions to prosecutors
– Contempt of court for officials– Monetary penalties rare
Harvard LSTU E-107 - Fall '11 Class 6 - © Akiba J. Covitz 2011
13
Chapter 9:Appellate Courts: Policy and Impact
• Responses by the legislative and executive branches to appellate decisions
– They can often just change the law being interpreted
– “Statutory decisions” by courts (decisions interpreting statutes)
– Congress overturns, overrides fairly often– Courts often invite legislatures to override their
decisions– “This is what the law says, we must interpret it as
follows, so change the law and we’ll change our ruling”
Harvard LSTU E-107 - Fall '11 Class 6 - © Akiba J. Covitz 2011
14
Chapter 9:Appellate Courts: Policy and Impact
• Responding to constitutional interpretation is much harder
• Constitutions are difficult to amend, even on the state level
– At the state level, this usually involves a proposal by the legislature, and then ratification by the people;
– At the federal level, classic example is the 26th Amendment• SCOTUS nullifies federal statute lowering voting age
across the country; has local and state impact• They say that in order to mandate that the states lower
their voting ages, the Constitution needs to be amended • It’s amended
Harvard LSTU E-107 - Fall '11 Class 6 - © Akiba J. Covitz 2011
15
Chapter 9:Appellate Courts: Policy and Impact
• Influencing the implementation process– Congress can provide incentives and
penalties to implementation of appellate court decisions
– In 1964, Congress gives LBJ the power to implement Brown, the power to withhold federal funds for lack of compliance
– Desegregation then finally really begins
Harvard LSTU E-107 - Fall '11 Class 6 - © Akiba J. Covitz 2011
16
Chapter 9:Appellate Courts: Policy and Impact
• Attacking the courts as institutions– FDR and court-packing in 1937– Remove jurisdiction
• Only once has Congress limited the Court’s jurisdiction, in1869 and in relation to Reconstruction
• Few if any of these attempts to attack the Court have been adopted (usually House adopts, Senate does not)
• SCOTUS generally recognizes the pressure and backs off • Lots of public attacks by elected officials, interest groups• In the 19th century, state legislatures sometimes respond
to unfavorable decisions by cutting judge’s salaries to 25 cents a year or disbanding and then creating entirely new courts
Harvard LSTU E-107 - Fall '11 Class 6 - © Akiba J. Covitz 2011
17
Chapter 9:Appellate Courts: Policy and Impact
• The Impact of Courts on Society– Finally here!– Can they have an impact? How? Should they try
to?– Those who conclude that the courts exert
significance influence over society are making two causal arguments:
1. Courts directly impact behavior by changing people’s incentives– Change personal injury laws → leads to more suits → forces
manufacturers to be more careful about what they produce2. Second, less direct link → courts trigger broader social
change by influencing people’s thinking and the structures in which they operate (Brown and MLK?)– Harder to demonstrate this
Harvard LSTU E-107 - Fall '11 Class 6 - © Akiba J. Covitz 2011
18
Chapter 9:Appellate Courts: Policy and Impact
• The Impact of Courts on Society– Policymakers in the other branches also act
on issues that courts address• Congress, LBJ need to enforce Brown• They both agree it is worth enforcing• But what would there have been to enforce
without Brown? • Could the other branches have acted in the same
direction as Brown, without the SCOTUS acting first?
Harvard LSTU E-107 - Fall '11 Class 6 - © Akiba J. Covitz 2011
19
Chapter 9:Appellate Courts: Policy and Impact
• The impact of courts on societyThurgood Marshall in 1967:“The Negro who was once enslaved by the law became emancipated by it, and is achieving equality through it. To be sure law is often a response to social change; but . . . it can also change social patterns. Provided it is adequately enforced, law can change things for the better, moreover it can change the hearts of men, for law has an educational function also.”
• King in the 1957:“The habits if not the hearts of people have been and are being altered every day. Judicial decrees may not change the heart, but they can restrain the heartless.”
Harvard LSTU E-107 - Fall '11 Class 6 - © Akiba J. Covitz 2011
20
Chapter 9:Appellate Courts: Policy and Impact
• The impact that courts do have– Non-trivial effects on crime/criminal justice– Status of women– Court action can create symbolic foci
• Roe v. Wade becomes a rallying point, for pro and anti – Status of African Americans
• Some argue that the courts have had little effect in this area
• Courts often initiated the actions• But they only became effective when the other branches
acted• Courts certainly not the only actor
– WWII » Blacks and women (military service)» Cold War
Harvard LSTU E-107 - Fall '11 Class 6 - © Akiba J. Covitz 2011
21
Chapter 9:Appellate Courts: Policy and Impact
• The impact that courts do have– Conclusions (Baum’s):
• SCOTUS’s decisions were neither necessary to sustain the civil rights movement nor sufficient to protect it from harassment
• But they likely strengthened the movement significantly • The courts likely have been important contributors to social
change in this area and in other areas• Although court opinions would have little impact in
themselves, serve to bolster and stimulate other forces for change
• The courts can make a difference in American society• Never lose sight of the fact that courts are closely linked
with the rest of government and society • “Umpires” (CJ Roberts)
Harvard LSTU E-107 - Fall '11 Class 6 - © Akiba J. Covitz 2011
22
Hall & McGuire:Chapters 1 to 3
• Presentations
• Discussion
Harvard LSTU E-107 - Fall '11 Class 6 - © Akiba J. Covitz 2011
23
For Next ClassOctober 27:
Assignment :
Hall & McGuire, Chapters 4 through 12