Download - CQPR 2016 Presentation
![Page 1: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Business Excellence Consulting, Inc.Ph: 787.705.7272 – www.calidadpr.com
Application of Six Sigma Tools in the Pharmaceutical Industry
PRChem Annual ConventionAugust 5th, 2016
Ritz Carlton Hotel and Casino, Isla Verde PR
![Page 2: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Agenda
I. Six Sigma IntroductionII. Management and Organizational Infrastructure for Six SigmaIII. DMAIC Breakthrough MethodologyIV. Application of Tools: Define PhaseV. Application of Tools: Measure PhaseVI. Application of Tools: Analyze PhaseVII. Application of Tools: Improve PhaseVIII. Application of Tools: Control PhaseIX. Application of Tools for an Annual Product Review
2
![Page 3: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
This presentation is designed for those persons who are involved in implementing Six Sigma and want to understand its core concepts and benefits.
Provides an overview and orientation of Six Sigma methodologies and organizational requirements.
Audience
3
![Page 4: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Course Objectives
ü Describe the Six Sigma Breakthrough strategyü Understand each participant’s role in the Six Sigma
Initiativeü Relate the roles and responsibilities of the
Champion, Black Belt, Green Belt and Team Members
ü Understand the DMAIC methodology and how it applies to improvement projects
4
![Page 5: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Section I: Six Sigma Introduction
What is Six Sigma?
3-Sigma vs. 6-Sigma
Six Sigma Objective
What Makes Six Sigma Work?
DMAIC Roadmap
![Page 6: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
ü Management mandated and directed improvement program focused on breakthroughs in financial performance and customer satisfaction
ü Uses Champions, Black Belts and Green Belts to facilitate change
ü Focused on core business and Customer needs
ü A systematic method for process and product improvement
ü A Greek symbol for measuring performance variation
ü A metric for evaluating performance quality
ü A standard of excellence (3.4 defects per million opportunities)
What is Six Sigma?
6
![Page 7: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
3-Sigma vs. 6-Sigma
![Page 8: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
CenterProcess
ReduceSpread
Off-Target Too Much Variation
Centered On-Target
The objective is to understand customer requirements and reduce
process variation and defects
Six Sigma Objective
8
![Page 9: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
ü Select and work on the most important problems and projects to the business and Customer
ü Assure those projects impact customer satisfaction and financial performance
ü Allocate the time to get the work doneü Have your best people work on themü Provide those individuals with all the training, tools, and resources
they need to make the performance breakthroughü Provide Management direction, support and routine review of
performanceü Require a well thought out, objective and data driven solution ü Verify the dollar savings of your effortsü Sustain the benefits of the solution over time
What Makes Six Sigma Work?
9
![Page 10: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Section II: Management Infrastructure for Six Sigma
Interrelationship of Six Sigma Infrastucture
Site Champion and Executive Staff
Hands on Champions
Master Black Belt
Black Belts / Green Belts
All Employees
![Page 11: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Interrelationship of Six Sigma Infrastructure
![Page 12: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Site Champion and Executive Staff
Functions
Set the vision
Create the mandate for improvement
Initiate and fund the activity
Establish and maintain the reporting structure
Responsibilities (10%+ of time)
Identify Champion/Sponsor in each functional area
Review of projects (members of Governance Boards)
Measure Project results
Training
2 day Champion Training12
![Page 13: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Hands-On Champion (Sponsor)
Functions
Communicate the vision
Create the mandate for improvement
Provide direction and remove barriers
Achieve financial results and communicate success
Responsibilities (10%+ of time)
Identify Black Belts and Green Belts
Identify and approve all Six Sigma projects
Part of Governance Board
Measure Black Belt performance
Training
2 day Champion Training 13
![Page 14: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Master Black Belt
Functions
Provide technical expertise on Six Sigma and Lean methodology to Black Belts and Green Belts
Work in support of the Black Belt and Champion
Assist in education and training activities
Responsibilities (100% of time)
Work daily with team members, Black Belts and Champions
Participate in the review of projects
Monitor all Six Sigma projects
Training
Black Belt Training, 2 years minimum as a Black Belt and a Masters Degree in a related field
14
![Page 15: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Black Belts and Green Belts
FunctionsBlack Belts 100% dedicated to process improvement, Green Belts 20%Work on improvement projects with other Green Belts and Team MembersAchieve financial results for each project
Responsibilities (100 – 20%+ of time)Use the DMAIC methodology to create breakthroughs in performanceReport progress to the ChampionHold team meetings and provide project managementWork with the Master Black Belt
Training20 day Black Belt Training 10 day Green Belt Training
15
![Page 16: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
All Employees
Functions
Work to achieve excellence in daily work
Participate in Lean Six Sigma projects
Support team activities
Identify opportunities for improvement
Responsibilities (5-10%+ of time)
Participate in Lean Six Sigma activities as requested
Complete action items as assigned by the team
Attend team meetings
Training
1 day Lean Six Sigma Awareness training 16
![Page 17: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Section III: DMAIC Breakthrough Methodology
Methodology
Process
Roadmap
![Page 18: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
DMAIC Methodology
18
![Page 19: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
DefineIdentify Project, Champion and Project OwnerDetermine Customer Requirements and CTQsDefine Problem, Objective, Goals and BenefitsDefine Stakeholder/Resource AnalysisMap the ProcessDevelop Project Plan
MeasureDetermine Critical Xs and YsDetermine Operational DefinitionsEstablish Performance StandardsDevelop Data Collection and Sampling PlanValidate the MeasurementsMeasurement Systems AnalysisDetermine Process Capability and Baseline
AnalyzeBenchmark the Process or ProductEstablish Causal Relationships Using DataAnalysis of the Process MapDetermine Root Cause(s) Using Data
ImproveDesign of ExperimentsDevelop Solution AlternativesAssess Risks and Benefits of Solution AlternativesValidate Solution using a PilotImplement SolutionDetermine Solution Effectiveness using Data
ControlStatistical Process ControlDetermine Needed Controls (measurement, design, etc.)Implement and Validate ControlsDevelop Transfer PlanRealize Benefits of Implementing SolutionClose Project and Communicate Results
DMAIC Roadmap
![Page 20: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Section IV: Application of Tools -Define Phase
Project Charter
- Problem Statement
- Scope
- Goal Statement
- Resources
- Benefits
Project Charter Example
![Page 21: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
ü Problem
ü Objective & Scope
ü Goal/target
ü Resource requirements
ü Financial benefits
ü Strategic benefits
ü Team resources
ü Project approval
In this step you will establish direction for the project by documenting
Título del Projecto: Responsable: Espónsor del Projecto:
Caso de Negocios: (Resumen corto detallando los beneficios del proyecto, incluyendo la parte económica)
Escriba el caso de Negocios:
Descripción de la Oportunidad: (Detalle la oportunidad que el proyecto quiere mejorar)
Describa la Oportunidad:
Alcance del Projecto: (Defina los limites del proyecto)
Escriba los límites del Proyecto
Metas del Poyecto: Especifica Medible Alcanzable Relevante
Escriba las Metas del Proyecto
Miembros del Equipo (Listado de los miembros y sus funciones)
Listado de miembros del equipo aqui
Milestones/Deliverables: (Fecha que en que esperamos completar cada etapa)
D - M - A - M - C -
Project Charter
![Page 22: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
ü A description of the issue or problem
ü What, when, where and how the problem occurs
ü What is critical to quality (CTQ) from the customer perspective? What is nonconforming to specifications?
ü Define the boundaries of the problem, how big is the problem?
ü What are the consequences of the problem to the Company and or Customer?
ü Do not state a solution when describing a problem
Description of the “Pain”
Project Charter:Problem Statement
22
![Page 23: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
ü What process will the team focus on?
ü What are the boundaries of the process we are to improve? Where does the process begin? Where does it end?
ü Which customers will be affected / included
ü What is outside of scope for the team?
ü What constraints or timelines must the team work under?
Customer or Suppliers Site or Line Process
Process 1
Process 2
Process 3
Project Charter:Scope
![Page 24: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Goal Statement Example:
Reduce Packaging Line #2 scrap by 33% at the end of 3Q 2016.
ü Describe, in measurable terms, what success will look like when you’ve solved the problem
ü Include a statement of the performance level that will satisfy your CTQ and the time frame in which you plan to implement the improvement. State targets and tolerances where appropriate.
Project Charter:Goal Statement
24
![Page 25: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Determine the Stakeholders
Who will need to be involved and at what level for this project to be successful?
Determine Team Members
Who will need to be on the team and at what % of their time?
Determine any Capital or HR Requirements
What materials, testing, software programming, outside services or equipment will be needed? Are those costs acceptable to management?
Other Support to be Successful
Project Charter:Resources
25
![Page 26: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
ü Benefits may include any of the following:ü Hard dollar savings (cost reduction)ü Soft dollar savings (cost avoidance)ü Improved Customer satisfactionü Improvement in the performance metrics (cycle time, yield,
defects, etc.) ü Improved job satisfaction (reduction in frustration)ü When considering benefits… what must change for the
savings to occur?
Project Charter:Benefits
26
![Page 27: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
![Page 28: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Section V: Application of Tools -Measure Phase
Measurement System Analysis
Process Capability
Graphical Tools:
- Histogram / Dotplot
- Boxplot
- Pareto- Scatterplot
![Page 29: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Measurement System Analysis
29
![Page 30: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
Elements of Variation
![Page 31: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
◆ Each operator measures the same part several times.◆ Data must be balanced; that is, operators must measure
each part the same number of times.◆ Units must represent the whole range of expected
variation. It is recommended to select parts within the specification range, that is, parts from the lower specification limit, parts from the upper specification limit, and parts within the specification limits.
◆ Operators must measure the parts randomly. They must not know which part number they are measuring at any given time.
31
Gage R&R Basics
![Page 32: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32
Gage R&R Metrics
◆ Repeatability—The variation caused by the instrument. It is the variation observed when an operator measures the same part repeatedly using the same measurement instrument.
◆ Reproducibility—The variation caused by the measurement system. It is the variation observed when several operators measure the same part using the same instrument.
◆ Percent precision-to-tolerance (% P/T)—The percentage of the specification tolerance occupied by the measurement system variation.
◆ Percent gage R&R (% R&R)—The percentage of the total variation occupied by the measurement system.
![Page 33: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
33
Performing a Gage R&R
![Page 34: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34
Performing a Gage R&R
![Page 35: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Process Capability
35
![Page 36: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Analyzing Process Capability
Capable Process
Incapable Process 36
![Page 37: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Process Capability Indices
37
![Page 38: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Interpreting the Process Capability Indices
38
![Page 39: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Process Capability Example
39
![Page 40: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Process Capability Example cont.
40
Individuals
Moving Range
![Page 41: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Process Capability Example cont.
41
![Page 42: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Process Capability Example cont.
42
![Page 43: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Process Capability Example cont.
43
![Page 44: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Graphical Tools
44
![Page 45: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Describing the Data:Histograms
45
![Page 46: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Describing the Data:Dotplots
46
![Page 47: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Comparing Groups:Boxplots
47
![Page 48: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Prioritizing Our Actions:The Pareto Diagram
48
![Page 49: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Analyzing Relationships:The Scatterplot
49
![Page 50: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Section VI: Application of Tools -Analyze Phase
Hypothesis Tests:
- 1 sample t, 2 sample t, ANOVA
- 1 sample sign, Krustal-Wallis
- F test, Levene
![Page 51: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
◆ A hypothesis test is a method of making decisions using data from our processes.
◆ In statistics, a result is called statistically significant if it is unlikely to have occurred by common causes of variation alone, according to a predetermined threshold probability called the significance level.
51
Overview
![Page 52: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
◆ If the p-value is less than the required significance level, then we say the null hypothesis is rejected at the given level of significance. – Under this scenario, we might accept the alternate
hypothesis. ◆ If the p-value is not less than the required significance
level, then the test has no result. – The evidence is insufficient to support a conclusion.
52
Overview
![Page 53: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
◆ To summarize, here is a slogan you can use to remember when to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis (H0):
“If p-value is low, the null hypothesis must go.”
◆ In other words, when the p-value for the null hypothesis is lower than a predetermined value, then the null hypothesis must be rejected.
53
Overview
![Page 54: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
◆ When dealing with hypothesis testing, there are four decisions that can be made.
◆ Two of those decisions are correct decisions, while two of them are wrong decisions.
◆ In statistics, those wrong decisions are called type I error and type II error.
54
Overview
![Page 55: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
55
Overview
![Page 56: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
◆ One-Sample t-Test– Comparing one average to a target value
◆ Two-Sample t-Test– Comparing the averages of two populations
◆ One-Way ANOVA Test– Comparing the averages of two or more populations, using
just one factor
56
Comparing Means
![Page 57: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Three months ago, a company implemented a new CAPA investigation process after a massive training. The company wants to know if the training is paying off, that is, if the average closure time for the investigations has decreased significantly. Before training, average closure time was 20 days.
57
One-Sample t-Test Example
![Page 58: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
58
One-Sample t-Test Example
![Page 59: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
A company wants to compare how long it takes (in hours) for each shift in the quality control laboratory to perform an analytical test on a specific product. There are two shifts: shift 1 and shift 2. A given test is selected, and the times to complete that test are collected and analyzed with statistical software.
59
Two-Sample t-Test Example
![Page 60: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Two-Sample t-Test Example
NOTE: A test for variances must be performed prior to the two-sample t-test
![Page 61: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
61
Two-Sample t-Test Example
![Page 62: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
A company wants to compare the performance of three shifts in terms of the manufacturing cycle time to determine if there are significant differences in their averages. After verifying the assumptions related to normality of the data and equal variances, the box plots shown in the next page were developed and a One-Way ANOVA performed.
62
One-Way ANOVA Example
![Page 63: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
63
One-Way ANOVA Example
![Page 64: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
64
One-Way ANOVA Example
![Page 65: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
Although it was proven that the average manufacturing cycle time for each shift was not statistically different, the performance among the shifts does not appear to be the same. For that reason, the company developed a quality index to measure their performance. The index is based on a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 means poor performance and 5 means excellent performance.
65
One-Way ANOVA Example
![Page 66: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
66
One-Way ANOVA Example
![Page 67: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
67
One-Way ANOVA Example
![Page 68: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
◆ One-Sample Sign Test– Comparing one median to a target value– Non-parametric equivalent to the one-sample t-test
◆ Two-Sample Mann-Whitney Test– Comparing the medians of two populations– Non-parametric equivalent to the two-sample t-test
◆ Krustal-Wallis Test– Comparing the medians of two or more populations, using
just one factor– Non-parametric equivalent to the ANOVA test
68
Comparing Medians
![Page 69: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
The median cycle time for investigation has been 25 days (50% of investigations needed more than 25 days to be completed). After new root cause analysis training, three months of data were used to evaluate the improvement (if any).
69
One-Sample Sign Test Example
![Page 70: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
70
One-Sample Sign Test Example
![Page 71: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
A pharmaceutical company wanted to determine if there are significant differences in the hardness of the tablet they manufacture using two different pieces of equipment. In order to analyze this, a period of one year of production was collected from each machine. After performing a normality test, it was noticed that data do not follow the normal distribution. The histograms in the next page show a p-value for the Anderson-Darling normality test of 0.0000 for each machine, indicating that the data do not follow the normal distribution.
71
Two-Sample Mann-Whitney Test Example
![Page 72: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
72
Two-Sample Mann-Whitney Test Example
![Page 73: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
73
Two-Sample Mann-Whitney Test Example
![Page 74: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
A pharmaceutical company wanted to analyze three different suppliers of a fluid used in their manufacturing process in order to select one of them. A critical characteristic of the fluid is viscosity, measured in centipoise (cP). The specifications for the viscosity of the fluid range from 2.4 to 3.6 cP. Data from the three suppliers were analyzed and a histogram and descriptive statistics of them generated.
74
Krustal-Wallis Test Example
![Page 75: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
75
Krustal-Wallis Test Example
![Page 76: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
76
Krustal-Wallis Test Example
![Page 77: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
◆ F-test– Comparing variances of two populations
◆ Bartlett Test– Comparing variances of two or more populations
◆ Levene Test– Comparing variances of two or more populations when
they do not fit a Normal distribution
77
Comparing Variances
![Page 78: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
A company wants to analyze two different adhesives for the transdermal patches they manufacture. Adhesives on a patch generally help maintain contact between the transdermal system and skin surface. The adhesiveness of the patches is critical in the drug delivery mechanism, its safety, product quality, and efficacy. As such, a good adhesive should easily adhere to the skin with an applied finger pressure and be tacky enough to maintain a strong holding force. The adhesive should also be easily removed from the skin without leaving a residue. The specification for the adhesiveness of the transdermal patch ranges from 300 to 3500 g/system.
78
F-test
![Page 79: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
79
F-test
![Page 80: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
80
F-test
![Page 81: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
Let us suppose that in the previous example the manufacturer would like to test a third adhesive. Since the F-test can only compare two variances at a time, we need to perform a Bartlett test.
81
Bartlett Test Example
![Page 82: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/82.jpg)
82
Bartlett Test Example
![Page 83: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/83.jpg)
83
Bartlett Test Example
![Page 84: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/84.jpg)
84
Bartlett Test Example
![Page 85: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/85.jpg)
A pharmaceutical company wants to evaluate the time it takes their analysts to perform a certain laboratory test. They have noticed too much variation in the time it takes the various shifts to complete the test and would like to investigate the reason for the variation. In order to start the analysis, the time it took each analyst to perform the laboratory test (in hours) is collected. Then, the data are segregated by shift.
85
Levene Test Example
![Page 86: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/86.jpg)
86
Levene Test Example
![Page 87: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/87.jpg)
87
Levene Test Example
![Page 88: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/88.jpg)
88
Most Commonly Used Hypothesis Tests
![Page 89: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/89.jpg)
Section VII: Application of Tools -Improve Phase
Lean Tools
Control Charts
![Page 90: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/90.jpg)
◆ Value stream mapping◆ Minimization of non-value added activities◆ Set-up reduction (SUR)◆ The use of standard operating procedures◆ Total productive maintenance◆ Poka-yoke techniques to prevent or detect errors ◆ Workplace organization (5S approach)◆ Just-in-time principles◆ Continuous flow manufacturing concepts 90
Lean Techniques
![Page 91: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/91.jpg)
Control Charts
91
![Page 92: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/92.jpg)
Section VIII: Application of Tools -Control Phase
Rational Subgroups
Nonrandom Patterns
Variables Control Charts:
- IMR, Xbar & R, Xbar & s
Attributes Control Charts:- p, np, c, u
![Page 93: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/93.jpg)
◆ One of the most important concepts in control charting is the rational subgroup.
◆ A rational subgroup is just a subset of a group intended to be as homogeneous as possible. In that way, we will be able to compare the variation within each subgroup and compare the variation between subgroups over an extended period.
◆ But how do we determine the appropriate subgroup size? That will depend on the process being studied. 93
The Rational Subgroup
![Page 94: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/94.jpg)
94
Nonrandom Patterns
![Page 95: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/95.jpg)
◆ Test 1—One point more than 3 sigma from centerline◆ Test 2—Nine points in a row on same side of centerline◆ Test 3—Six points in a row, all increasing or all decreasing◆ Test 4—Fourteen points in a row, alternating up and down◆ Test 5—Two out of three points in a row more than 2 sigma from
the centerline (same side)◆ Test 6—Four out of five points in a row more than 1 sigma from the
centerline (same side)◆ Test 7—Fifteen points in a row within 1 sigma from the centerline
(either side)◆ Test 8—Eight points in a row more than 1 sigma from the centerline
(either side)95
Nonrandom Patterns
![Page 96: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/96.jpg)
◆ Individuals and Moving Range Chart» Subgroup size = 1
◆ X-bar and R Chart» Subgroup size from 2 to 5
◆ X-bar and s Chart» Subgroup greater than 5
96
Variables Control Charts
![Page 97: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/97.jpg)
97
Variables Control ChartsA
vera
geR
ange
![Page 98: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/98.jpg)
◆ p Chart: percent defectives◆ np chart: number of defectives◆ c chart: number of defects◆ u chart: avg. number of defects per unit
98
Attributes Control Charts
![Page 99: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/99.jpg)
99
Attributes Control Charts
![Page 100: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/100.jpg)
100
Attributes Control Charts
![Page 101: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/101.jpg)
101
Attributes Control Charts
Example of p Chart
![Page 102: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/102.jpg)
Section IX: Application of Tools for an Annual Product Review
Descriptive Statistics
Process Capability
Hypothesis Tests
![Page 103: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/103.jpg)
103
Process Monitoring for an Annual Product Review (APR)
![Page 104: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/104.jpg)
104
Process Monitoring for an Annual Product Review (APR)
![Page 105: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/105.jpg)
105
Process Monitoring for an Annual Product Review (APR)
![Page 106: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/106.jpg)
106
Process Monitoring for an Annual Product Review (APR)
![Page 107: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/107.jpg)
107
Process Monitoring for an Annual Product Review (APR)
![Page 108: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/108.jpg)
108
Process Monitoring for an Annual Product Review (APR)
![Page 109: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/109.jpg)
Thanks !!!
109
![Page 110: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/110.jpg)
Business Excellence Consulting Inc.
110
![Page 111: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/111.jpg)
Business Excellence Consulting Inc.
111
![Page 112: CQPR 2016 Presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042723/586a1bac1a28ab9c7d8b6b3e/html5/thumbnails/112.jpg)
Business Excellence Consulting Inc.
112
www.calidadpr.com