Download - Cut to Box Module Final
-
8/8/2019 Cut to Box Module Final
1/26
Cut to Box Module
A dissertation submitted in partial Fulfillment of the requirement for the
award of Degree in
Bachelor of Fashion Technology (Apparel Production)
Submitted By
Mihir Kumar Jha
Mukund Narayan
Under the Guidance of
Ms MausamiAmbashtha
Ms NilimaTopono
Department of Apparel Production
National Institute of Fashion Technology,Kolkata
-
8/8/2019 Cut to Box Module Final
2/26
This is to certify that this Project Report titled{cut to box
module}is based on our,Mihir Kumar Jha and Mukund
Narayan, original research work, conducted under the guidance
ofMs MausamiAmbashtha and Ms NilimaToponotowards
partial fulfillment of the requirement for award of the Bachelors
Degree in Fashion Technology (Apparel Production), of the
National Institute of Fashion Technology,Kolkata.No part of this work has been copied from any other source.
Material, wherever borrowed has been duly acknowledged.
-
8/8/2019 Cut to Box Module Final
3/26
Index:
-
8/8/2019 Cut to Box Module Final
4/26
Abstract:
cutto box word is coined by John Allen and Greg Thomerson, president and managing
director of Total Systems Development, respectively. Cut to box module in garment
industry means a single location physically connected cutting, shaping, molding, sewing
and pack
ing. The na
me is S
upe
rma
rke
t.
As in general life supermarket does notmanufacture anything, just a place for purchasing
and selling, in our supermarket also no manufacturing is done. The goods are cut parts
and trims. And the currencies are kanban cards raised by respective deartments.
First the whole production unit was studied and analysed with a lot of data of several
department.
The problems, they were facing were:
y Huge inventories
y Greater lead time
y Quality problems
y Wastage ofman power
y Execution of plans.
Then the basement was drilled and found these enlisted factors as seeds.
y Trims department deadlock/bottleneck
y Stoppages in the line due to delay in trims
y Delay due tochangeover
y Poorexecution of plan
y Late delivery
y Unorganized paperwork and recordkeeping
y Lackofcontrol overthe cutting department
y Excessive inventory /unorganized inventory
y Excessive workload on distributors
We suggested them to implement cut to box. In which we successfully solved most of
theirproblems. Kanban is taken as a tool to implementcutto box.
-
8/8/2019 Cut to Box Module Final
5/26
CUTTO BOX MODULE
Low barriers to entry.Intense, price-based competition.Supply and distribution chains that
stretch around the world. Product lines that switch out completely every two to three
months. Fickle and unpredictable customers. Low margins. These are the business
realities for garmentmanufacturers.
One would think that such challenges would have forged one of the most efficient and
competitive industries in the world, butthats farfromreality. When itcomes tooperational
efficiency, the pursuitof lowestcost laborcan hide a lotofsins.
Hence we, as a part of our graduation project, have tried to develop a module which
consists of only those lean tools which are relevant to the garment industry. We have
named itcutto box module and its immediate objectives are
Minimized throughputtime.
Low inventory.
Orderly production.
Increased Productivity
Cutto box means tocutonly thatmuch whichcan be packaged, i.e. tocut according to
yourconsumption capacity. Its basically a lean tool; the only difference is that itfocuses
primarily on the implementation of a pull flow system.
Pull / Kanban is a method ofcontrolling the flow of production through the factory based
on a customers demand. Pull Systems cont rol the flow of resources in a production
process by replacing only what has been consumed. They are customer order -driven
production schedules based on actual demand and consumption rather than forecasting.
Implementing Pull Systems can help you eliminate waste in handling, storing, and getting
yourproducttothe customer.
The core idea is tomaximize customer value while minimizing waste. Simply, lean means
creating more value forcustomers with fewerresources.
A lean organization understands customer value and focuses its key processes to
continuously increase it. The ultimate goal is to provide perfect value to the customer
through a perfect value creation process thathas zero waste.
To accomplish this, lean thinking changes the focus of management f rom optimizing
-
8/8/2019 Cut to Box Module Final
6/26
separate technologies, assets, and vertical departments tooptimizing the flow of products
and services through entire value streams that flow horizontally across technologies,
assets, and departments tocustomers.
Eliminating waste along en tire value streams, instead of at isolated points, creates
processes that need less human effort, less space, less capital, and less time to make
products and services at far less costs and with much fewer defects, compared with
traditional business system s. Companies are able to respond to changing customer
desires withhigh variety, high quality, low cost, and with very fastthroughputtimes. Also,
information management becomes much simplerand more accurate.
The 7 Manufacturing Wastes
Waste elimination is one of the most effective ways to increase the profitability of any
business. Processes either add value or waste tothe production of a good or service. Toeliminate waste, it is important to understand exactly what waste is and where it exists.
While products significantly differ between factories, the typical wastes found in
manufacturing environments are quite similar. For each waste, there is a strategy to
reduce or eliminate its effect on a company, thereby improving overall performance and
quality.
The seven wastes consistof:
1. Overproduction.
Simply put, overproduction is to manufacture an item before it is actually required.
Overproduction is highly costly to a manufacturing plant because it prohibits the smooth
flow of materials and actually degrades quality and productivity. The Toyota Production
System is alsoreferred to as Just in Time (JIT) because every item is made just as it is
needed. Overproduction manufacturing is referred to as Just in Case. This creates
excessive lead times, results in high storage costs, and makes it difficultto detect defects.
The simple solution tooverproduction is turning offthe tap; this requires a lotofcourage
because the problems that overproduction is hiding will be revealed. The concept i s to
schedule and produce only whatcan be immediately sold/shipped and improve machine
changeover/set-up capability.
-
8/8/2019 Cut to Box Module Final
7/26
2. Waiting
Whenever goods are not moving or being processed, the waste of waiting occurs.
Typically more than 99% of a product's life in traditional batch-and-queue manufacture will
be spent waiting to be processed. Muchof a products lead time is tied up in waiting forthe
nextoperation; this is usually because material flow is poor, production runs are too long,
and distances between work centers are too great. Goldratt (Theory of Constraints) has
stated many times thatone hour lost in a bottleneck process is one hour losttothe entire
factorys output, which can never be recovered. Linking processes together so that one
feeds directly intothe nextcan dramatically reduce waiting.
3. Transporting
Transp
orting p
rod
uctbe
tween p
rocesses is a
cos
tin
cursi
on w
hich
adds no
value
to
the
product. Excessive movement and handling cause damage and are an opportunity for
quality to deteriorate. Material handlers must be used totransportthe materials, resulting
in anotherorganizational costthat adds nocustomer value. Transportation can be difficult
toreduce due tothe perceived costs ofmoving equipment and processes closertogether.
Furthermore, it is often hard to determine which processes should be nextto eachother.
Mapping productflows can make this easierto visualize.
4. Inappropriate Processing
Often termed as using a sledgehammer to crack a nut, many organizations use
expensive high precision equipment where simpler tools would be sufficient. This often
results in poor plant layout because preceding or subsequent operations are located far
apart. In addition they encourage high asset utilization (over -production with minimal
changeovers) in ordertorecoverthe highcostofthis equipment. Toyota is famous fortheir
use of low-cost automation, combined with immaculately maintained, often older
machines. Investing in smaller, more flexible equipment where possible; creating
manufacturing cells; and combining steps will greatly reduce the waste of inappropriate
processing.
5. Unnecessary Inventory
Work in Progress (WIP) is a directresultof overproduction and waiting. Excess inventory
tends tohide problems on the plantfloor, wh ichmust be identified and resolved in orderto
-
8/8/2019 Cut to Box Module Final
8/26
improve operating performance. Excess inventory increases lead times, consumes
productive floor space, delays the identification of problems, and inhibits communication.
By achieving a seamless flow between workcenters, many manufacturers have been able
to improve customer service and slash inventories and theirassociated costs.
6. Unnecessary / Excess Motion
This waste is related to ergonomics and is seen in all instances of bending, stretching,
walking, lifting, and reaching. These are also health and safety issues, which in todays
litigious society are becoming more of a problem for organizations. Jobs with excessive
motion should be analyzed and redesigned for improvement withthe involvementof plant
personnel.
7.De
fe
cts
Having a direct impacttothe bottom line, quality defects resulting in reworkor scrap are a
tremendous cost to organizations. Associated costs include quarantining inventory, re-
inspecting, rescheduling, and capacity loss. In many organizations the total cost of
defects is often a significant percentage of total manufacturing cost. Through employee
involvement and Continuous Process Improvement (CPI), there is a huge opportunity to
reduce defects atmany facilities.
In the latest edition of the Lean Manufacturing classic Lean Thinking, Underutilization of
Employees has been added as an eighth waste to Ohnos original seven wastes .
Organizations employ their stafffortheir nimble fingers and strong muscles butforgetthey
come to work everyday with a free brain. It is only by capitalizing on employees'creativity
that organizations can eliminate the other seven wastes and continuously improve their
performance.
Many changes over recent years have driven organizations to become world class
organizations or Lean Enterprises. The first step in achieving that goal is to identify and
attack the seven wastes. As Toyota and other world-class organizations have come to
realize, customers will pay for value added work, but neverfor waste.
-
8/8/2019 Cut to Box Module Final
9/26
Literature Review
In 1990 Jam
es Wom
ack
wrot
e a book
called "T
he Ma
chine T
ha
tC
hanged T
he W
orld".
Womack's book was a straightforward accountofthe history of automobile manufacturing
combined with a study of Japanese, American, and European automotive assembly
plants. What was new was a phrase-- "Lean Manufacturing."
Lean Manufacturing caught the imagination of manufacturing people in many
countries.Lean implementations are now commonplace. The knowledge and experience
base is expanding rapidly.
The essential elements of Lean Manufacturing are described at our page "Principles ofLean Manufacturing." They do not substantially differ from the techniques developed by
Ohno, Shingo and the people at Toyota. The application in any specific factory does
change. Just as many firms copied Ford techniques in slavish and unthinking ways, many
firms copy Toyota's techniques in slavish and unthinking ways and with poorresults. Our
series of articles on implementation includes a " Mental Model" to assist the thinking
process and guidance on strategy and planning.
There is no cookbook for manufacturing. Each firm has its own unique set of products,
processes, people, and history. While certain principles may be immutable, their
application is not. Manufacturing Strategy will always be a difficult, uncertain, and
individual process. Strategy ("The General's Art") is still, largely, an art. But, that should
not preventus from bringing the available science to bearon the problem.
-
8/8/2019 Cut to Box Module Final
10/26
The history of Lean Manufacturing goes backto at least 1850 when El;i Whitney perfected
the concept of interchangeable parts. The timeline above shows periods of major
development and some ofthe key personalities.
Kanban (orkamban ,katakana, meaning "signboard" or "billboard") is a conceptrelated to
lean and just-in-time (JIT) production. According to TaiichiOhno, the man credited with
developing JIT, kanban is a means through which JIT is achieved.
Kanban is a signaling systemtotrigger action. As its name suggests, kanban historically
uses cards to signal the need for an item. However, other devices such as plasticmarkers
(kanban squares), balls (often golf balls), an empty parttransporttrolley, or simply a floor
location can also be used to trigger the movement, production, or supply of a unit in a
factory.
-
8/8/2019 Cut to Box Module Final
11/26
The need to maintain a high rate of improvements led Toyota to devise the kanban
system. Kanban became an effective tool to supportthe running ofthe production system
as a whole. In addition, it proved to be an excellent way for promoting improvements
because reducing the numberofkanban in circulation highlighted problem areas.
The
te
rm
ka
mban des
cribes an e
mbellis
hed w
ooden
or
me
tal sign
often
rep
resen
ting a
trademarkor seal. Kamban became an important partofthe Japanese mercantile scene in
the 17th century, much like the military banners had been to the samurai. Visual puns,
calligraphy and ingenious shapes were employed to indicate a trade and class of business
ortradesman.
In the late 1940s, Toyota began studying supermarkets with a view to applying store and
shelf-stocking techniques to the factory floor, figuring, in a supermarket, customers get
what they need, at the needed time, and in the needed amount. Furthermore, the
supermarket only stocks what it believes it will sell, and customers only take what they
need because future supply is assured. This led Toyota to view a process as a customer
of preceding processes, and the preceding processes as a kind of store. The customer
process goes to this store to get needed components, and the store restocks. As in
supermarkets, originally, signboards were used to guide "shoppers" to specificrestocking
locations.
"Kanban" uses the rate of demand tocontrol the rate of production, passing demand from
the end customer up through the chain of customer-store processes. In 1953, Toyota
applied this logic in theirmain plantmachine shop.
An important determinantofthe success of production scheduling based on "pushing" the
demand is the quality ofthe demand forecastthatcan receive such "push."
Kanban, by contrast, is part of an approach of receiving the "pull" from the demand.
Therefore, the supply or production is determined according to the act ual demand of the
customers. In contexts where supply time is lengthy and demand is difficulttoforecast, the
bestone can do is torespond quickly toobserved demand. This is exactly what a kanban
systemcan help: It is used as a demand signal that immediately propagates throughthe
supply chain. This can be used to ensure that intermediate stocks held in the supply chain
are bettermanaged, usually smaller. Where the supply response cannot be quick enough
tomeet actual demand fluctuations, causing signi ficant lost sales, then stock building may
be deemed as appropriate which can be achieved by issuing more kanban. TaiichiOhno
states thatto be effective kanban mustfollow strictrules ofuse (Toyota, for example, has
-
8/8/2019 Cut to Box Module Final
12/26
six simple rules, below) and thatclose monitoring ofthese rules is a never-ending taskto
ensure thatthe kanban does what is required.
Toyota's six rules
Do not send defective products tothe subsequent process
The subsequent process comes to withdraw only what is needed
Produce only the exact quantity withdrawn by the subsequent process
Equalize production
Kanban is a means tofine tuning
Stabilize and rationalize the process
Three-bin system
A simple example ofthe kanban system implementation might be a "three -bin system" for
the supplied parts (where there is no in-house manufacturing) one bin on the factory
floor (demand point), one bin in the factory store, and one bin atthe suppliers' store. The
bins usually have a removable card that contains the product details and other releva nt
information the kanban card.
When the bin on the factory floorbecomes empty, i.e, there is demand for parts, the empty
bin and kanban cards are returned tothe factory store. The factory store then replaces the
bin on the factory floorwith a full bi n, which alsocontains a kanban card. The factory store
then contacts the suppliers store and returns the now -empty bin with its kanban card. The
supplier's inbound product bin with its kanban card is then delivered intothe factory store
completing the final step tothe system. Thus the process will neverrun outof product and
could be described as a loop, providing the exact amountrequired, withonly one spare so
there will never be an oversupply. This 'spare' bin allows forthe uncertainty in supply, use
and transport that are inherent in the system. The secret to a good kanban system is to
calculate how many kanban cards are required for each product. Most factories using
kanban use the coloured board system (Heijunka Box). This consists of a board created
especially forholding the kanban cards.
Conwip
Production controlsystems can be classified as pull and push systems (Spearman et al.
1990). In a push system, the production order is scheduled and the material is pushed into
the production line. In a pull system, the start of each product assembly process is
triggered by the completion of another at the end of production li ne. One variantof a pull
-
8/8/2019 Cut to Box Module Final
13/26
system is the CONstant Work in Process (CONWIP) system (Spearman et al. 1990) which
is known for its ease of implementation.
CONWIP is a kind of single-stage kanban system and is also a hybrid push-pull system.
While Kanban systems maintain tightercontrol of system WIP throughthe individual cards
at each workstation, CONWIP systems are easierto implement and adjust, since only one
setof system cards is used to manage system WIP. CONWIP uses cards to control the
number of WIPs. For example, no part is allowed to enter the system without a card
(authority). After a finished part is completed atthe last workstation, a card is transferred to
the first workstation and a new part is pushed into the sequential process route. In their
paper, Spearman et al. (1990) used a simulation to make a comparison among t he
CONWIP, kanban and push systems, and found that CONWIP systems can achieve a
lower WIP level than kanban systems.
Card control policy in CONWIP system
In a CONWIP system, a card is shared by all kinds of products. However, Duenyas (1994)
proposed a dedicated card control policy in CONWIP and he stated thatthis policy could
perform as a multiple chain closed queuing network.
These are some of the few cases we gone through. Since kanban is not very popular in
garmentmanufacturing yet so we studied other similarmanufacturing industries.
Case 1
y A kanban system schedules the production of six people assembling industrial air
cleaners from sheetmetal and purchased parts.
y They build 15 basic units and many variations. Ten assembly cells have fixtures,
tools and parts ready at all times.
y Eachcell produces one ortwo basicmodels. One tothree people can staff any cell.
An adjacent warehouse holds a small finished stockof each standard model.
y The charts show the data which formed the design basis. P-V analysis displays
relative volume. The orderanalysis shows volatility and the order size profile.
-
8/8/2019 Cut to Box Module Final
14/26
The Team Leader scans incoming orders. He prepares one-time cards for large orders
and customized items. The Leader sorts cards coming fromthe warehouse. All cards then
goon a board arranged by assembly cell. Cells withcards in the red zone have priorit y. If
necessary, additional people work an overloaded cell.
The warehouse picks standard orders from stock and sends cards to production. They
combine standard items with any customized items arriving from production and ship the
orders.
In a second phase of this project, sheet metal and welding operations moved directly
adjacenttothe assembly cells. They have dedicated people and equipment. The welding
Team Leader examines each assembly cell for stocks of welded cabinets. He alsochecks
-
8/8/2019 Cut to Box Module Final
15/26
the Board.
This daily checking constitutes the signal for replacement. Operators weld the necessary
replacement cabinets and place them on a paint line. This replenishment is normally 24
hours. Itmay be as little as fourhours.
The welding department stocks sheet met al components in large wiretainers. Each
wiretainer has special shelves and brackets. It holds a fixed number of each item on a
particularcabinet. A minimum quantity signals operators orthe Team Leaderto send the
basket to Sheet Metal for replenishment. The sheet metal Team sets up and builds
components to replenish the basket and returns it to the Welding. This normally occurs
within 24 hours. Higher volume cabinets may have several identical baskets to maintain
welding production during replenishment.
This complete systemuses Kanban, Direct Link and Re-Order Point. A Broadcast system
overlays the other systems since all team leaders have access to the final assembly
Kanban board.
This kanban system eliminated 96% offinished goods inventory, simplified scheduling and
eliminated losses fromobsolescent product.
-
8/8/2019 Cut to Box Module Final
16/26
Case2
The largest manufacturer of office furniture in the world, Steelcase Inc.is dedicated to
helping people in offices across the globe work effectively in the utmost com - fort. The
realization ofthis goal begins in theirmanufacturing plant. One oftheir divisions, Steelcase
North America, wants to expand manufacturing capacity wit hin the confines of existing
floor space. Manage- ment decided that one they could accomplish this objective by
eliminating unnecessary inventory from the manufactur- ing floor, and streamline as-
sembly line processes. They concentrated on the kanban, the receptacle thathouses parts
needed to assemble office furniture. Kanbans are the key .
A Case for Kanbanscomponents of inventory systems used to control work in process
throughout Steelcase Inc.
Problem
Making sure the kanbans are the correct size is always a challenge. A kanban thatholds
the right amountof parts will never run outof stock and it wontcause extra money and
materials to be tied up in excess inventory. The manufacturing departmentconsistently en -
deavors to make the kanbans large, just in case extra stock is needed, while the
accountants are constantly trying to pull back and minimize kanban size to keep costs
down. Therefore, the challenge is tokeep a happy medium between the twoobjectives.
SIMULATION SUCCESS / JUNE 2000There are approximately 120 kanbans in our plant
which we estimate will save additional $100,000 and free up 50,000 to 60,000 square feet
offloorspace.
With six additional manufacturing plants in our Grand Rapids and Kentwood complexes ,
these could add an additional $600,000 in material and labor savings, plus 300,000 to
1,800,000 square feetoffloorspace.
Aboutthe Author: Mike Cavanaughholds dual bachelors degrees from Aquinas College in
Business Ad
minis
tra
tion and Psy
chol -
ogy. He a
ttended
college, wi
th
tim
eoff
for
m
ilita
ry
duty, raising three daughters and building a house. Mr. Cavanaugh currently resides as
Senior Industrial Engineerat Context Plant, Steelcase Inc.
He has been with Steelcase formore than 22 years, and has hel d several positions from
production worker and production supervisorto his current engineering role. Mr.
Cavanaugh brings a long manufacturing background to his use of simulation. Addi -
tionally, he has been involved in his community as a volun - teer atthe Public Museum and
-
8/8/2019 Cut to Box Module Final
17/26
as a mentorforthe Grand Rapids Area Pre - College Engineering Pro - gram.
Solution
The simulation tech team at Steelcase wanted to help manufacturing find a way to help
them correctly size their kanbans. They felt confident that ProcessModel simulation
modeling would dothe job. A kanban model was designed, and then to get a proper idea
of the size of kanban needed the manufacturing process was divided into three
hypothetical areas: the fabrication of steel parts, the painting of these parts, and then final
assembly ofthese painted parts.
Most of the kanbans used in the manufacturing process are utilized between fabrication
and paint, sothis is was input intothe model. With simple modifications tothe arrival cycle,
it was discovered that eachkanban partcan be tested and tracked.
First, the model user enters the part numberto be tested. He
then adds the cycle time for the replenishing process. The model tracks the variable
quantity on hand that allows the model user to see if the quantity was sufficient or if it
ran dry. Consumption and replenishing processes can also be viewed atthis point.
Results
We have seen a $3,000 saving in material and laboron the three parts tested sofar and
have also freed the much needed floor space. There are approximately 120 kanbans in
our plant which we estimate will save additional $100,000 and free up 50,000 to 60,0 00
square feetoffloor space. With six additional manufacturing plants in our Grand Rapids
and Kentwood complexes, these could add an additional $600,000 in material and labor
savings, plus 300,000 to 1,800,000 square feetoffloorspace.
LEAN, AS THE TOYOTA-REFINED PRODUCTION SYSTEM for continuous process
improvement, is everywhere. Beginning in the auto industry, its application expanded
outward to all forms ofmanufacturing, supply chain management and logistics as well as a
wide range of service-oriented industries. As industrialengineers move forward intocritical
roles in a growing number of these areas, they find themselves faced with the need to
integrate and adapt the benefits of lean to their specific environments. This article
describes one company's view of those benefits, as reflected in our eight years
-
8/8/2019 Cut to Box Module Final
18/26
implementing lean worldwide in the garment industry.
Total Systems Development (TSD) is an international lean systems consulting firm with
more than 12 years of experience helping commercial and military clients in the training
and im
plem
enta
tion
ofs
us
tainable lean sys
te
ms -based i
mp
rove
men
ts. W
hen we we
re
firs
t
approached to work in fashion wear production, we took on the projects with the
confidence that the core principles of a lean transform ation hold true, in spite of an
industry's particular characteristics. Several garment clients in Asia and Latin America,
scores of facilities and eight years later, those principles --committed leadership, good
management, a systems perspective and a refusal to live withthe status quo in any partof
the system--did not disappoint.
TSD's lean approach
While the startof any lean-based improvement program is influenced by the client's most
immediate needs, never lose sightofthe largercontextofthatcha nge. Our programs are
grounded on Toyota's five-phase lean implementation process model. While the phases
follow a general sequence, the degrees to whichthey overlap and interconnect (or attimes
shift out of order) depend on each organization's circumsta nces and the skill and
experience of its chosen lean guide.
Stability
The focus of this first phase is to highlight and recognize instability so that immediate
problem solving can begin. The emphasis is in establishing supervisory authority, instilling
a sense of urgency to solve problems and creating a visual workplace so that those
problems become visible. By the close ofthis phase, the organization musthave the ability
to see instability and the skill and knowledge toreactto it appropriately.
Continuous flow. In this phase, the objective is tocreate continuous, controlled flow from
task to task. Flow is typically interrupted by equipment, process or material. Therefore,
each of these elements is examined, and tools are developed to overcome those
interruptions. Atthe close ofthis phase, processes should flow fromtasktotask, attheir
natural rate.
-
8/8/2019 Cut to Box Module Final
19/26
Synchronous production
The objective of this phase is to adjust the flow of processes to the rate of customer
demand (takt time). Work is redistributed so that each process is completed within this
rate, and as work is rebalanced, each task within the process is documented into a
standard. From that time forward, the visual representation of that process is used to
compare the actual tothe standard.
Pull systems
Once the process flows atthe rate ofcustomer demand, the nextobjective is to pull the
product through the various processes while pulling material from suppliers. This phase
focuses on maintaining smooth and even flow, but to do so by pulling production from
process to process, where only those parts just necessary forthe next production process
are atthe ready. This, in turn, sets the requirementforthe suppliers to provide material at
the rate of its actual use (success at this stage results in drastically lowered work -in-
process and inventory levels).
Level production. Once the organization is capable of producing at the rate of customer
demand, the next stage of improvement, and the one that delivers the greatestreturn, is
reached by focusing on the way production is scheduled and built. The objective is to
build. product in the exact sequence ordered, leveled in volume, mix and sequence, over a
fixed period and equal to customer demand. In this final phase , the organization
encounters the greatest challenge to reduce the time fromorder to completion. Success
results in shorter lead-time and greaterflexibility in meeting customer demands.
Traditional garment production system
Aside fromthe traditional batch-processing, command and control mentality typical ofmost
non-lean p
rod
uction
fa
cili
ties,
the ga
rmen
tind
us
try p
ossesses
othe
rdis
tin
ct
characteristics. It makes regular use of a predetermined motion time (PMT) system
designed by GSD (Corporate) Ltd. that is "used to evaluate working practices with a view
to establishing the time it takes to perform a given task and to determine the costs
associated tothattask."
This systemtranslates to "general sewing data," including standard minute values (SMV),
which assign time and value for specified component actions associated with the
-
8/8/2019 Cut to Box Module Final
20/26
manufacture of garments. The SMVs for all actions required to produce a single
hypothetical garment, as dictated by the GSD, are tallied. This total is the starting pointfor
the bidding process between the customer and the manufacturer.
Reliance on this format supports traditional forms of factory performance measurement,
such as numberof standard hours in operation and pieces per person perhour. These run
counter to lean-based metrics, which focus on customer demand, the ability to produce
defect-free products the firsttime through withoutrepair, equipment effectiveness and the
ability to produce the right products on the right day in the right sequence in the righttime.
Garment production is very labor-intensive due to a large variety of stitch types and
specialized equipment. We observe that in Asia, it is often the case thatthe predominantly
female workforce turns over every several years, placing a heavy burden on training and
increasing pressure tomaintain high skill levels to produce a balanced repetitive cycle time
(whichonly raise the importance of such lean tools like standardized work, job instruction
and balancing operations).
Path to transformation
Lean transformation, a challenge for any organization, is as simple as refusing to allow
problems to persist and as complex as changing an individual's fundamental perspective
on production. Each pathtothattransformation reflects an urgent need to solve proble ms
from leadership down, a managed discipline to adhere to standards until improvements
supersede them, a systems approach to an aligned set of goals with supporting action
plans and a refusal to accept the status quo. Without this recipe, change is rarely more
than a disconnected setof loosely aligned initiatives thatrise and fall like the tide. Below
are some observations based on garmentmanufacturers working to balance the demands
ofcurrentoperations withthe trials of a transformation to lean.
Planning. Planning for new work is a continual challenge in the garment industry. One
plantmay run 18 lines simultaneously: six running new productforonly three weeks, nine
running p
rod
uctlas
ting
four
mon
ths (
on a
repea
ting ann
ual
cy
cle) and
three
running
productcontinuously.
In the traditional approach planning is intimately tied to the SMV. As an example, a
customer solicits for the manufacture of a given numberof newly designed garments for
delivery in a fixed number of days. All the garment's component actions are tallied in a
standard configuration to arrive at an SMV needed to produce one garment. This is
multiplied by the number of units ordered and divided into the adjusted available time,
-
8/8/2019 Cut to Box Module Final
21/26
factoring in the numberof people needed toconstructone p roduction module along with
an estimated efficiency factor. In this approach, we have observed that the SMV is the
goal on whichthe process is structured.
In contrast, a lean approach starts with customer demand and the drive to produce
producttotakttime (often mistaken forcycle time, it is not dependenton yourproductivity).
It is a measure of customer demand expressed in units of time. Dividing the customer
demand into the available work time per shift provides an estimated takt time (e.g., x
seconds perunit). In this approach, the SMV perunit is only a departure point.
The elements and time required for making one unit are physically operators or team
leaderto establishthe lowerrepeatable time (the "standard"). The production model layout
is created maximizing space and efficiency. Then the workloads for all the operators are
examined and balanced, refining the numberofoperators needed tomeettakttime. The
numberof people required is based on the actual value -added time fromthe standard plus
an allowance for necessary non-value-added process steps. The starting point is based on
the study of actual operations and revised with direct participation fromthe operators.
When compared, a traditional approach to planning and change is more dictat ed and
controlled than a lean approach. Forthis reason, the transition fromthe formertothe latter
often occurs gradually. The risk is minimized and the testof lean is small enough now to
put customers at ease, allow the methods to evolve and changes i n the process to
emerge. When tradition meets change the key is small incremental steps, allowing time to
adjustto skills and learners to achieve confidence.
Managing change. Central to the management of change in a lean system are: mutual
trust and respect among all parties involved, creation of a highly structured relationship
between the parties withthe appropriate metrics in place, and navigating between knowing
what needs to be done and what can be done. This last element demands an acute
awareness, throughobservation and analysis (using the metrics mentioned above), ofthe
need for and progress toward balanced change, bothcultural and physical.
We take our first example from a garment manufacturer that, over the last three years,
im
plem
ented lean sys
te
ms in a n
umbe
r
ofplan
ts in an e
ffort
tos
horten lead-
tim
es andreduce waste. In the industry specifically, this means shortening the time and distance
from the cutting to sewing to packaging to shipment. But many in the organization
previously committed significant monies to centralizing cutting in a facility that "pushed"
product to many separate sewing facilities located miles apart. Some leaders not only
resisted change, burresisted being changed, invested as they were in an intuitive belief i n
the efficiency of batch processing.
-
8/8/2019 Cut to Box Module Final
22/26
However, once they acquired a trust in the methodology, they felt secure in committing to
an experiment a trial "cut-to-box" project where a single location physically connected
cutting, shaping, molding, sewing and packing. The result was compelling. The time from
cutting to boxing was reduced from 55 hours to less than eighthours. Significantchange
comes when leaders notonly trusttheir guide, buttrustthe methodology as demonstrated
by the metrics ofothersuccesses.
Another example demonstrating the challenges of man-aging change is revealed in an
early project in a single plant containing two pilot implementation areas progressing
simultaneously. In one, the consultant executed a disciplined change effort that carefully
balanced the physical capacity to execute tools and techniques withthe mental capacity to
absorb and endorse the majorcultural change.
In the second pilot area a less balanced approach prevailed. Major physical alterations to
machinery and line arrangements were made that, while consistent with lean methods,
reconfigured the responsibilities of certain senior operators. These changes, without
additional preparation for the inevitable culture change, resulted in heightened plant
tensions that were only allayed with quick attention to those cultural issues. The
juxtaposition of these two results in a single plant illustrates the difficulty in balancing
between knowing what needs to be done and what can be done. It is critical to secure
commitment from the people on the ground (those who add value) to orchestrate the
ach
ievem
ents
tha
ta
re needed.
Organizational structure
A traditional role of the industrial engineer is to understand the relationship between
performance and performance standards and define those standards. Yetthis can create
and adversarial relationship between the industrial engineer and the persons executing the
standards. In the typical garment production facility some ofthe industrial engineer's roles,
in the guise of the general sewing data, reinforce that conflict. Under the auspices of aseparate organization promoting industry standards, engineers in a remote locate
determine idealized times for performing minute and discrete acts of production, the
compilation of which equa l the time and labor (SMV) required to create any garment.
These standards are then adopted and perpetuated by the manufacturer notonly to bid on
new work, but to determine the necessary labor requirements, sometimes without ever
having produced such a garment before.
-
8/8/2019 Cut to Box Module Final
23/26
A lean system recognizes the value in the clarity the industrial engineer brings to the
situation. However, its challenge is to integrate the IE's roles and minimize the stress of
conflict. In a lean system, there are two types of personnel: those who add value and
those who supportthose who add value. It is not practical foroperators to determine the
steps and pace of production initially. These are governed by takt time, pitch (space in
which they do their work) and sequence. But then ope rators take than information,
participate in its refinement and turn it into a continuously flowing process.
Industrial engineers and those in remote pilot areas determine the sequence ofoperations
needed to build a quality product. They practice until pe rfect within the constraints of
expected customer demand (takttime). Once done and documented, the process is taken
to the line for trials and consideration by the team. The team, through trials, determines
whetherthe process can flow continuously fromoperatortooperator; the configuration of
required machines; and the inventory or in-process stock needed in eachoperation.
Teammembers workon any problem discovered, and a final product is documented into
standard worksheets. Although the numberofchanges ultimately made may be few, the
real aimofthis process is forthe operators to gain ownership ofthe standard work. Lean
enables operators and gives themthe skills to analyze abnormalities (e.g., quality issues
equipment down time, overtime) and so lve problems using plan-do-check-act/adjust
methods and statistical process control tools.
In a lean system, the industrial engineer and the operatorworkhand -in-glove formaximum
effectiveness. Gone is the command and control mentality where communication is one
way. Participation is the watchword. Time studies and line balancing activities are the
responsibilities ofteammembers, and suggestions made by operators, after evaluation by
management, are often implemented withthe assistance ofthe industria l engineer. In our
experience, garments arriving on the line in the traditional way often exhibit an efficiency
factor of 50 percent, as compared to 90 percent as the starting point for those items
brought along in a lean-based approach.
The
tradi
tional ga
rmen
t
man
ufa
cture
rexe
mpli
fies a w
orld w
he
re expe
cta
tions a
re
developed outside any relationship with the floor-bound "value adders." In contrast, the
world of lean places primary emphasis on those value-adders, trying their success tothe
organization's success with a supportive multi-person organization. The industrial engineer
is key tothis environment, responsible forcreating the basic work interactions, meeting the
needs ofthe value adderand building trust and respect along the way.
Leadership (is all the rage). The lean transformation requires leadership. This can be
-
8/8/2019 Cut to Box Module Final
24/26
found atthe very apex ofthe organization, as we encountered withthe dynamic leadership
ofone garment manufacturer chairman, or farther down the hierarchy in the roles of the
company lean champion orplantmanager. Regardless of its source, successful leadership
typically exhibits fourcritical characteristics.
First, the leader is a person of vision. This means seeing beyond the obvious and
remaining consistently dissatisfied witht he obvious and remaining consistently dissatisfied
with the status quo. Second, the leaders exhibits a willingness to learn and understand.
Those unwilling to learn are generally unwilling tochange, and change is a prerequisite to
transformation. Third, t he leader demonstrates a willingness to devote personal time tothe
change effort. Delegating participation toothers notonly sends the wrong message tothe
organization, itundermines the leader's ability tocomprehend the complexity ofthe effort
and provide meaningful input. And fourth, the leaderhas patience. There is a willingness
to let people learn, take risks and sometimes fail.
These characteristics are not frequently found in an industry that has a history of
controlling environments where labo r was considered a resource, a factor of production
ratherthan an investmentto solicitmore participation. Butthe garment industry reflects our
wider commercial and military experiences; lean leaders are rare in any traditional
production environment. But if we begin with someone who possesses the seeds of an
enthusiastic lean vision and a willingness to act decisively and assume controlled risk,
these can be nurtured into a disciplined understanding of lean and accountability to the
system as a whole.
One final characteristic is revealed in the necessary transition from "boss" to "leader."
Many bosses are examples of society's best and brightest with good ideas and the
company's interests atheart. Butoften they pushthese ideas in the formofchanges u pon
those that add value, and the ideas often fail. The hallmark of lean leaders and a lean
system in general is involvement. Lean leaders solicit and value participation, and this
feeds buy-in and commitment from the entire organization. They encourage pr oblem
solving and val
ue-
consis
ten
t, in
cre
men
tal
change
ove
r
tim
e. They
rely
on
the expe
rt
knowledge of those who add value, and in so doing inspire and drive change in those
around them.
The garment industry is a challenging and rewarding environrnent to i mplement lean. It
has chased low laborrates only tofind thatthis cannotmean low quality. Ithas played a
major role in the world market and clearly understands the meaning of world class. It
contains some of the best people capable of making needed cha nges and providing
-
8/8/2019 Cut to Box Module Final
25/26
innovative solutions.
However, the garment industry has allowed inventory to expand, made quality variable at
times and allowed itselfto be defined by the low -cost provider. Its problems are notunlike
those ofother industries, and so like other industries, itfinds its solutions in lean. Lean is
about process, not product, and about people participating in that process. Lean is about
discipline, teamwork and the refusal to perpetuate the status quo. The systems approach
to garment production provides an environment where competition flourishes.
In time, the systems approach will free the industry from its compulsion tochase low labor
rates and allow ittofocus on providing the highest quality garments atthe lowestcost with
the shortest lead-time. Soon, the industry will strike a balance between carefully studied
jobs, supportfrom qualified IEs and invigorated operators constantly striving forcontinuous
improvement. Throughout its evolution, committed, flexible industrial engineers will play a
critical role translating and embedding this into the workplace. The role is set and the
demand is great.
John Allen and Greg Thomerson are president and managing director of Total Systems
Development, respectively. Both are long-term alumni of Toyota's first North American
production facility, authors of the 500-page reference work Lean Manufacturing; A Plant
Floor Guide and recognized experts in lean systems methods.
-
8/8/2019 Cut to Box Module Final
26/26