NREB Natural Resources and Environment Board
Sarawak
DANIDA-SARAWAK GOVERNMENT
Urban Environmental Management System Project
BACKYARD COMPOSTING FOR KITCHEN AND
GARDEN WASTES: DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
January 2004
DANIDA
Danish International Development Assistance
DANIDA-SARAWAK GOVERNMENT
Urban Environmental Management System
Project
BACKYARD COMPOSTING FOR KITCHEN AND
GARDEN WASTES: DEMONSTRATION
PROJECT
January 2004
Report No. UEMS_TEC_02-16
Issue No. 1
Date of Issue January 2004
Prepared George ak Nyaon
Checked ILA & Tang
Approved
UEMS Backyard Composting for Kitchen and Garden Wastes: Demonstration Project
1
.
Table of Contents
1 Introduction 2
2 Monitoring 3
3 List of Monitoring 4
4 Observation 6
4.1 Composting Activities 6
5 Interview 15
6 Finding of Issues and Problem 18
7 Summary and suggestions 20
UEMS Backyard Composting for Kitchen and Garden Wastes: Demonstration Project
2
.
1 Introduction
48 units of the Humus composting bin have been acquired for the
UEMS pilot project on backyard composting. Seven units are still
stored at 3-R Green Centre. These bins are planned to be tested at a
school compound. The remaining bins were distributed during 2001-
2003. Four units were distributed to Sibu and Miri Municipal Councils
and four units were distributed to NREB Regional offices for exhibi-
tion and education purposes. Nine units were distributed to YB’s (In-
cluding Federal Minister) and seven units were distributed to govern-
ment and ex-government officers. Four bins were distributed to busi-
nesses and institutions, three units were distributed to schools and the
remaining 10 bins were distributed to private households.
UEMS Backyard Composting for Kitchen and Garden Wastes: Demonstration Project
3
.
2 Monitoring
The total number of premises monitored during 2003 is 14. These
premises represent a total of 17 units of the bin. Six premises received
the bins in 2001, one premise received the bin in 2002 and 7 premises
received the bins in 2003. Nine of the premises are private house-
holds, composting their garden and kitchen waste (10 units). Two of
the premises are schools, which use the bins for environmental educa-
tion activities/PALS (Love Our Environment Club) (3 units). The re-
maining 3 premises include an institution (1 unit), a landscaper (1
unit) and a food outlet (2 units). Three of the recipients spent most of
their time doing gardening.
Site visits have been made several times during the year to monitor the
composting process. Beside that, phone conversations with house-
hold/premises have been made to gather additional information on en-
countered difficulties and issues related to the use of the bin.
The monitoring activities have generally been limited by the availabil-
ity of transport.
UEMS Backyard Composting for Kitchen and Garden Wastes: Demonstration Project
4
.
3 List of Monitoring
No. Name of Participants Year Address Number of bin received
Food Outlet
1. Participant 1
(Orchid Garden)
2001 No. 333A
Lrg. 5 Jln. Siol Kandis
93050 Petra Jaya
2
Landscaping
2. Participant 2
(Landscaper)
2001 No. 3
4th
Mile Penrissen Rd.
Jln. Burung Landas
Kuching
1
Institution
3. Splendid Nursing Home
(Nursing Home)
2003 Lrg. 1 Rubber Rd.
Satok, 93400 Kuching
1
Schools
4. Participant 3
SMK Bt. Lintang
2001 SMK Batu Lintang
Jln Kolej, 93200 Kuching
1
5. Participant 4
SMK Padawan
(School)
2002 SMK Padawan
Km 14 Jln. Padawan
93250 Kuching
2
Households
6. Participant 5
2001 No. 225
Lorong Stampin 20
Jln. Stampin, Kuching
1
7. Participant 6
2001 No. 18
Jalan Urat Mata
Tabuan Jaya, Kuching
2
8. Participant 7
2001 No. 48 Taman Wee Wee
Lrg Kapor 10, Jln Stapok
Kuching
1
UEMS Backyard Composting for Kitchen and Garden Wastes: Demonstration Project
5
.
9. Participant 8
2003 Lot 1661
Jln. Tun Abdul Rahman Yaakub
93050 Petra Jaya
Kuching
1
10. Participant 9
2003 2421 Lrg. C4
Perumahan Fasa II
93050 Petra Jaya, Kuching
1
11. Participant 10
2003 No. 298, Jln. Kenny Hill
93350 Kuching
1
12. Participant 11
2003 No. 121 Arang Rd.
93250 Kuching
1
13. Participant 12
2003 No. 32 Medan Temple
Off Palm Rd.
93400 Kuching
1
14. Participant 13
2003 No. 4 , Lrg. Setia Raja 12A
Taman Stutong Indah
93550 Kuching
1
Total bins 17
UEMS Backyard Composting for Kitchen and Garden Wastes: Demonstration Project
6
.
4 Observation
The followings issues have been surveyed during the monitoring ac-
tivities:
Type of waste thrown in to the bin
Distribution of waste (kitchen and garden waste) (a ratio 1:4 was
recommended)
Condition of waste (dry/wet)
Organisms encountered in the bin (i.e. worm, cockroaches, mag-
gots, ants etc.)
Compost layer (any compost layer noticed)
Compost condition (dry/wet)
Maturity of their compost
Beside that, interviews were made with the premises to collect further
information on their composting activities.
4.1 Composting Activities
As mentioned, backyard composting was monitored for 14 premises.
These premises dump different types of organic waste into the bins.
Participant 1(Orchid Garden) has received 2 units. She is doing full-
time catering (business) in the house. She has assigned one of her In-
donesian staff to take care of the composting (turning, discharge waste
etc.). Banana skin, pineapple skin, lemon, watermelon, egg crust,
grass clipping, branches, wood and saw dust have been discharged
into the bin. For the second bin (see picture 2), the waste has slowly
turned into compost. However, certain undesired types of waste (metal
spoon, plastic bag and plastic bottle) have been found inside the bin.
According to the staff, the waste was mixed with soil to accelerate the
composting process.
UEMS Backyard Composting for Kitchen and Garden Wastes: Demonstration Project
7
.
Picture 1 – Fruits skins and food left over composted
Picture 2 - Compost after 10 month
Participant 2 (landscaper) was testing the bin simultaneously with
tests of other bin types. He had tried to compost a pure sunflower
seed fraction (bought from factory) in the Humus bin (see picture 3).
Only a small fraction of kitchen waste was mixed with the seeds.
UEMS Backyard Composting for Kitchen and Garden Wastes: Demonstration Project
8
.
Picture 3 - Sun flower seeds
However, after six month the seeds was failed to be composted (see
picture 4). This is most probably due to the compactness of the seeds
mass that did not allow for the ventilation process. A high number of
cockroaches and ants were noticed inside the bin. No compost layer
was observed during the monitoring. The bin was also hard to turn as
the bin was full and highly compact.
Picture 4 - Sunflower seeds after six month
UEMS Backyard Composting for Kitchen and Garden Wastes: Demonstration Project
9
.
Picture 5 - Splendid Nursing Home
Splendid Nursing Home is a home stay for the old citizens. Employed
staff was assigned to manage the composting. Therefore, instructions
had been given to them on the types and mixture of waste to be
dumped into the bins.
Picture 6 - Bin assembled at the middle compound of the garden
SMK Padawan (2 units) had already harvested the first batch of com-
post. However, currently the school did not fully utilize the compost-
ing bins. The bins were kept at the back of their power station. It was
noticed that the school currently only compost grass clippings and
another well-defined type of garden waste (see picture 7). The PALS
Club teacher informed that formation of compost was noticed at the
bottom of the bin 10 month after the first harvest. (See picture 8).
UEMS Backyard Composting for Kitchen and Garden Wastes: Demonstration Project
10
.
Picture 7 - Condition of grass clippings after five month
Picture 8 - Layer compost noticed after 11 month
At SMK Batu Lintang the composting activity was very limited. A
new PALS Club teacher had recently been appointed to conduct the
PALS Club activities. Picture 9 shows that the composting bin was
located at the front of store house. Only few grass clipping have been
put into the bin (see picture 10).
UEMS Backyard Composting for Kitchen and Garden Wastes: Demonstration Project
11
.
Picture 9 - SMK Bt. Lintang
Picture 10 - Grass and leaves put into the bin
The private households mixed the kitchen and garden waste as pre-
scribed (see picture 11- Participant 5’s house).
UEMS Backyard Composting for Kitchen and Garden Wastes: Demonstration Project
12
.
Picture 11 - Waste decomposed after five month
Picture 12 - Waste turn to compost (immature/not ready to harvest)
layer after seven month
Picture 12 - (Participant 5) shows that a compost layer is present at the
bottom of the bin. However, the compost is still not mature enough to
be harvested. Foul odour could be recognized inside the bin. Heat
could be felt at the top layers of the bin.
UEMS Backyard Composting for Kitchen and Garden Wastes: Demonstration Project
13
.
Picture 13 - (Participant 6) – shows new star fruits thrown into the bin.
This family was very active in gardening, and was therefore able to
carry out the composting according to the instructions (i.e. controlling
the composition of the waste thrown into the bin, turning of the bin
frequently etc.). Picture 14 shows matured compost, ready for harvest-
ing (after 12 month). The family found this speed of composting very
slow. Picture 15 shows the harvested compost.
Picture 13
Picture 14 - Matured compost layer after 11 month
UEMS Backyard Composting for Kitchen and Garden Wastes: Demonstration Project
14
.
Picture 15 - Compost harvested
All household that received the bin in year 2001 and 2002 still contin-
ued to compost their kitchen and garden waste in the Humus bin. All
these seven participants have harvested their compost at least two
times (no record on date). The new participants, who received the bins
in 2003, have not harvested any compost yet
UEMS Backyard Composting for Kitchen and Garden Wastes: Demonstration Project
15
.
5 Interview
Interviewed have been made to collect the following information's:
(a) Does composting work in diverting especially kitchen waste
from going to the garbage bin and if so in what percentage
(based on their experience)?
12 premises claimed that composting did reduce the amount of
kitchen and garden waste going to the garbage bin. However,
one of the participants told that one unit was not enough to
compost the kitchen waste. For the others participants, who
mainly compost the garden waste, the size of the bin was
enough to compost their waste.
(b) Type of waste put inside the bin (proportion of kitchen and
garden wastes)
Food leftover, fruits skins, eggs shell, grass clippings and dead
leaves is the common types of waste dumped to the bin. The
distribution of kitchen and garden waste is between 30:70,
40:60 and 50:50 (based on verbal statements).
(c) Did they put any worm into the bin to accelerate the compost-
ing process?
None of the participants put worm into their composting bin.
However, some of them asked from where they can get the
worm and what the type of worm is suitable.
(d) Did they harvest the compost? If they have - how much?
When? How many times? When was the last time?
Participants receiving the bins in 2001 or 2002 receivers have
all harvested their compost one or two times. The weight of the
harvested compost is around 5-10 kg. Participants receiving
the bins in May 2003 did not harvest any compost during
2003.
UEMS Backyard Composting for Kitchen and Garden Wastes: Demonstration Project
16
.
(e) Amount of compost produced compared to the waste volume
discharged to the bins.
7 of the premises claimed that the amount of compost was
about 5-10 percent of the original waste volume.
(f) Do they use the compost and how?
They use the compost for nourishment (sow it around the
plants i.e. flower and small trees).
(g) Any problem in using the bin i.e. odour problem?
The following are some of major problems that have been encoun-
tered:
Difficult to turn the bin when it was full-no handle to hold for
turning it.
Insects i.e. ants, cockroaches, maggot and another unidentified
organism were observed (the basement plate of the bin can not
avoid insects from entering the bin).
Odour problem (occurred about one or two weeks after new
wastes discharges into the bin).
The produced compost is very wet and it takes a long time for
drying.
Slow speed of composting (the bin only produces matured
compost after more than 10 month of composting)
(h) Who is normally in-charge for the bin, i.e. dump waste to the
bin, record waste before dumping it, turn the waste etc.?
Form one and form two students (for the school)- waste
mixture have not been monitored
Staff (food outlet, nursery)
Housewife or their children- children simply dump waste
without segregating it
Housemaids-don’t know/don’t concern about the type of
waste they dump into the bins
Others family members (grandfather/grandmother)
The actual composting is only in a few cases done by the
household parents. This may have a reducing effect on the
commitment
UEMS Backyard Composting for Kitchen and Garden Wastes: Demonstration Project
17
.
(i) Did they record the activities in the log book? If not, why?
None of the participants have recorded anything in the log
book (even though notice has been given and follow-up have
been made).
The following are the reasons given for why the log book was
unused:
No time/busy
Tedious
Family members/person that have been assigned do not
record anything
Forgot/ignorance
Difficult to estimate/weigh/identify the type waste
UEMS Backyard Composting for Kitchen and Garden Wastes: Demonstration Project
18
.
6 Finding of Issues and Problem
The following are issues that need further consideration based on ob-
servation and interviewed that have been made:
1. The composting process takes about 10 month before mature
compost is produced. Therefore, no compost can be removed ear-
lier to give space for the new kitchen and garden waste (waste
have to be thrown to garbage bin-again). The possibility of using
additives (e.g. nutrients) to accelerate the composting process were
requested
2. Some component (handle?) has to be installed on the bin to make
it easy for turning (see the arrow in picture 16-no item installed to
turn the bin).
3. Most of the insect problems are caused by the basement plate de-
sign that makes it easy for insects to enter the bin – question: Is it
suitable to use chemicals to kill the insects?
Picture 16 (composting bin design)
4. The manual (instruction) for the composting bin needs to be re-
designed for easy understanding and reading. The log book also
needs to be re-designed. Manual and log book also need to be
translated into local language.
UEMS Backyard Composting for Kitchen and Garden Wastes: Demonstration Project
19
.
5. The suitable types of organic waste to be discharged into the bin
need to be further specified.
6. The required mixture of dry and wet wastes should be specified.
The waste is generally too wet to allow for sufficient aeration. Use
of structure waste material (wood chips etc) and/or improved aera-
tion installations in the bin should be considered.
7. Staff/maids are not always fully committed to do proper backyard
composting and to record their composting activities in the log
book
8. Overlapping layers of waste compress the waste and makes it too
compact. The cone shape seems not always to be sufficient to
avoid compression.
9. The baseline plate may break when lifted from the ground due to
soft soil, it the support is not comprehensive.
UEMS Backyard Composting for Kitchen and Garden Wastes: Demonstration Project
20
.
7 Summary and suggestions
The 14 monitored premises are all continuing the composting. This
documents the willingness to practice composting. The bin has proven
effective to produce compost. However, composting process is slow
requiring 10 month (average) to produce matured compost.
Below is listed some options to properly promote the backyard com-
posting activities:
1. The manual for the composting bin needs to be reviewed and trans-
lated into local language (Malay and Chinese) to make it easy for
housewife and others family members to understand. The NREB
Environmental Education and Publicity Unit should be involved in
this activity. Information needs to be disseminated properly using
publication media i.e. pamphlets, leaflets etc.
2. Mechanism to easily turn the waste needs to be constructed
3. Supply of organisms (worm) or additives to effective accelerate the
composting process should be considered.
4. The possible use of structure material for aeration and drying
should be further surveyed.
5. The duration of the composting process should be further surveyed.
6. As different households/premises produce different type of organic
waste, i.e. schools and landscapers compared to households, the
manuals and procedures needs to be differentiated
7. The selection of household/premises for testing the composting bin
needs careful decision. It should be considered to give the presently
involved households an additional composting bin (if they are will-
ing to accept it)
8. To further promote the backyard composting, collaboration with
the local authorities and professional institutions i.e.
UNIMAS/UITM/Consultants should be established, especially re-
garding testing the effectiveness of the use of the composting bin
under tropical conditions
9. Backyard composting should to be seen as one of the options to
reduce organic wastes from entering the garbage bin. However, it
would be good if other options could also be brought to mind.