Day 2Session 1: Starting the CPF
Phase 1 – StartingInstitutional Arrangements
Government and FAO agreement • Formal government request NOT mandatory (except in case
of TCPf)
Resource mobilization for formulation (funds and staff)
Establishment of a CPF Core Team• Country level• FAO level (SRO, RO, HQ)• Management arrangements
The right team is in place
Phase 1 – StartingConcept note & Roadmap
Provides the rationale for the CPF formulation:
• Context analysis• Stakeholders to be involved in the process• Brief overview of FAO record in the country• Initial mapping of resource partners• Elements of communication strategy• Roadmap• Resources required for the CPF formulation
Get the CPF Cycle in Motion
Concept note can be used for TCPf request
Phase 1 – StartingValidation
Concept note & Roadmap are circulated to CPF focal points at SRO/RO/HQ:
• to describe the approach• to facilitate adequate planning of human and
financial support • to promote coordination and integration
Day 2 Session 2: Setting priorities
Strategic focus of FAO support
Situation analysis
Comparative Advantage assessm
ent & O
ption Analysis
... go to the Guide at page 28
… what should not be forgotten
Phase 2 – Setting PrioritiesSituation Analysis
Understanding challenges and opportunities
Group exercise (30’ minutes)Review the situation analysis:
•Have key challenges been clearly assessed?•Have national strategies and policies been analyzed?•Have national priorities been clearly identified? If yes, indicate the national priorities in the Priority Matrix template
•Are UN programming principles and DRR/DRM issues taken into consideration?
Day 2 Session 3: Comparative advantages
Comparative Advantages
Actual CA at
country level
Mandate to act
Capacity to act
Position to act
FAO Global GoalsFAO
Strategic Objectives/
ORsCore Functions
Resources
InfluencePartnership
s
Revealed CAPerceived
CAGaps
FPMIS Charts Ethiopia Historical
0
2,000,000
4,000,000
6,000,000
8,000,000
10,000,000
12,000,000
14,000,000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 (May)
Delivery of Emergency and Non- Emergency projects in US Dollars
Technical Cooperation Emergencies
FPMIS Charts
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 (May)
-2,000,000
0
2,000,000
4,000,000
6,000,000
8,000,000
10,000,000
12,000,000
14,000,000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 (May)
Delivery by Funding Source in US Dolllars
SPFS TCP TF Others TF/UTF UNDP
FPMIS Delivery by Sector2007-2011
-100,000
0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 800,000
[211] Natural Resources
[213] Livestock
[221] Nutrition
[223] Food and Agricultural Monitoring, Assessments and Outlooks
[256] Food Production in Support of Food Security in LIFDCs
[2C ] Diseases and pests of animals and plants
[2K ] Sustainable natural resources management
[4C ] Food security, poverty reduction and other development cooperationprogrammes
Group exercise (20’)
• Complete/revise your Priority Matrix!
Day 2 Session 4: Problem Tree Analysis
Sub-regional common prioritiesCountry Priority Source
Djibouti Production agricole, agriculture, élevage, pêche, ressources forestières incluan les éléments transversaux, genre, climat et environnement CPF
Somalia Increasing and stabilizing agricultural production and productivity and rural families incomes CPF
Burundi Professionalisation et intensification du secteur agricole CPF
Ethiopia Agricultural productivity and production CPF
Rwanda Intensification et développement des systèmes de production durable PSTA II
Kenya Agricultural productivity development
AGRICULTURAL SECTOR DEVELOPMENT strategy (ASDS)2009 - 2020
Uganda Increased and sustainable production and productivity strengthened CPF
Group exercise (30’)
Develop your Problem Tree!
Develop Cause-effect Analysis on the issue
“Agricultural Agricultural production and production and
productivityproductivity”