Download - DELTA Final.doc
-
7/28/2019 DELTA Final.doc
1/7
Q1.
Low rates of return on investment persist in the airline industry for several reasons,
involving several forces:
Union, employees and suppliers
From that point of view, Deregulation Act I 1978 by President Carter (line 16, p.2)
didn't change anything. Higher salaries and benefits are always on demand, and the
unions always have the power to go on strike if they don't get what they want, or
supplementing new work rules.
High salary structure which could represent 40% of total earnings in a 15 years career
(line 13, p.4) , together with10%-15% of total costs on fuel (line 16, p.4) , 15%-20%
of total costs on services, including commissions to outside constructors (line 21-22,
p.4) ' and a 15% of total costs on aircraft and facility rental (line 27, p.4) , created a
high cost structure.
With only 60%-70% load factor over the years 1978 to 2000, air carriers had a
relatively low profits (see Exhibit 1.(
Industry competitors-
Trying to differentiate themselves, major companies always try to improve service
offering, offer a variety of flight times, and improving inflight meals and movies,
causing high costs (line 12-13, p.2.(
Therefore, they had to charge twice as high as their intrastate counterparts (line 14,
p.2.(
High rivalry among the major companies caused too high costs, and in the intrastate
market, major air carriers needed to compete not only with each other, but also with
other intrastate small companies of flights of comparable lengths.
-
7/28/2019 DELTA Final.doc
2/7
Customers
Passengers focused on safety, reliability, convenience, service quality, entertainment
and food when choosing airlines (line 12-13, p.3.(
Therefore air carriers needed to differentiate themselves and give the best in every
aspect in order to attract customers, which led to high costs.
The development of the airline reservation system enables an online price
comparison, and customers become more aware of low price alternatives.
Online web sites gave customers more efficient access to travel information, and
increased the pressure on airlines to offer the lowest price (line 44, p.3.(
Substitute products
In the intrastate field, the major airlines had to compete not only among themselves
and with the small intrastate companies, but also with the bus companies and with the
train companies, which are usually cheaper.
Q2.
Air lines such as Southwest airlines and JetBlue earn enviable returns from some
reasons:
Reducing CASM
CASM (Cost per Available Seat Mile) is the common measure of cost in the airline
industry. An airline could lower its CASM by increasing the hours per day of its
aircraft were in service (P.2 L.30). in order to do so it was very important to prepare
the plane to takeoff as quickly as possible. Southwest airlines was the fastest with 27
minutes between Landing and takeoff. Also those airlines offered flights without
meals and an all coach cabin flights.
-
7/28/2019 DELTA Final.doc
3/7
Employees
Southwest and JetBlue enjoyed a good relationship and flexible work rules from their
employees.
Southwest gave to the employees bonuses (profit sharing plans by Southwest, P.5)
and worked closely with the unions.
JetBlue employed all nonunion workers which were proud to be workers and offered
high flexibility in the employment package and gave them good working conditions
(JetBlue P.6(
As a result the employees had a high motivation and performed better for example
contributed to quick turn time and high aircraft utilization (P.5(
Route and Airports selection
Southwest and JetBlue both provided services from secondary airports and by that
lowered the costs and avoided forceful battles with major airlines (P.5 L.39)
Innovation
Southwest was the first to set its price very low, and by that expanded her market also
to the auto travelers. By that they sometime increased the traffic on a certain route by
1000%/, which a lot from them were new customers.
JetBlue used technology in many aspects to be more efficient. 60% of the bookings
were online. The pilots used laptops which helped them in the "paperwork" so they
did it quicker and without any help. (P.6 L.31). also the reservation agents used the
internet to help handle peaks of reservation calls.
-
7/28/2019 DELTA Final.doc
4/7
Q3.
General management mistakes:
Many LCC attempted to expand to quickly, chose the wrong routes, and confronted
harsh competition from other airlines when flying from same airport. (P.5 L37)
Employees
Unions such as the pilots union demanded the same salaries as in the legacy carriers
for the low cost workers as well. There was a problem to differentiate between the
salaries of the airline legacy carrier workers and its low cost carrier workers, a
problem which largely increased the costs.
Complicated Logistics
LC companies which used their legacy companies (like CALite and Continental) in
order to reduce costs, by mixing flights and using the same foundation (airplanes,
employees) (P7 L8). Because of all the logistics formation became large and
complicated this mixture confused and harmed the passengers.
Complicated management
Some low cost subsidiaries were managed by the same management as their legacy
carrier founder and therefore saddled some of the bureaucracy and constraints, which
increased the costs.
Industry competitions
Brand:
Several legacy airlines established their own low cost subsidiaries (P7 L 5).
Subsidiaries of legacy airlines had to compete Southwest which was the first low cost
airline and had a high reputation , achieved by their simple pricing structure , high
-
7/28/2019 DELTA Final.doc
5/7
frequency flights and enthusiastic work force . Passengers related the low cost
subsidiaries to the legacy companies (sometimes the airlines themselves made the
relation) which was not always perceived as low cost. (P7 L 28)
Costs:
In the bottom line as can see from all listed above the Low cost subsidiaries of legacy
carriers could not compete with southwest's costs and sometimes their price was 70%
more expansive (P7 L26 ,Metrojet). Because the costs were higher the price was
higher and therefore less attractive for the passengers.
Q4.
The cross functional team was established to analyze and to process the data in order
to recommend the board of directors about the best strategic options, regarding the
low cost competition ("LCC").
Delta faces three strategic options:
1. Continue the status quo, in which Delta operates Delta Express, its low fair
subsidiary, simultaneously with its mainline flights. Although Delta Express
survived September 11th, by 2002 its profitability had deteriorated
considerably, as a result of the pilot union fight (Page 9, Line 3) and the new
high standards of JetBlue (Page 9, Line 5), the main competitor of Delta
Express.
Choosing this strategy will require re-branding of Delta Express, as well as
setting new goals and business objectives, in order to achieve better
performances.
2. Abandon the LCC market and compete it by creating new products and
services under the strong and familiar Delta brand. By doing that, Delta
-
7/28/2019 DELTA Final.doc
6/7
will implement its size advantage, without need for neither new investments
nor changing the organization structure.
Previous attempts to establish LC subsidiaries had failed due to organizational
failures in the company's headquarters (Page 7, Line 2-7), and high labor costs
as a result of the union's fight, caused by the pay differential in the subsidiaries
(Page 7, Line 8-11).
In light of the above, it's possible that the conflict of interests is too strong to
enable an operation of a profitable LC, using the same resources of the parent
company.
3. Recognize the failure of Delta Express, and Launch a new brand to compete
in the LC market. In light of the conclusions learned from the previous
attempt of Delta Express, This is probably the most promising strategy.
Nevertheless, the shareholders will be skeptic about the profitability of this
strategy, due to the high up-front investment and the failure of other low cost
subsidiaries.
In order to make a recommendation to Delta's Board, the following steps should
be taken:
1. First, the task force has to decide where Delta wants to be in the LC market,
by defining Delta's vision, turn it into missions, and then set some new goals
and targets for the future, regarding the LC market.
2. SWOT analysis for each one of the strategic options, in order to understand
the current situation and the potential compared with the other competitors.
The following considerations should be taken: organizational structure,
reputation, and geographical distribution and market trends.
-
7/28/2019 DELTA Final.doc
7/7
3. Internal analysis of Delta, in order to make the LC brand profitable without
impairing the old brand. Delta's advantage is its large resources labor,
maintenance, headquarter, but misuse of those resources will damage Delta in
the future.
4. External analysis of the market How to create added value in the LC market
for Delta's costumers? Does Delta have any advantage over its competitors in
prices or quality? What is the forecast regarding the factors that affects the
market?
5. A business plan for launching a new brand costs, structural change,
financing options, displaying few forecasts. It's possible that best solution is to
buy one of the exist LC airlines.