Download - Devi (Prosopis Juliflora)
Mesquite (Devi): Prosopis Juliflora A potential source of livelihood in Thar
Prosopis juliflora (Devi) is one of the 44 species of Prosopis, is an evergreen leguminous tree,
typical of arid and semi-arid regions, growing up to 10-15 m high. Protein and sugar-rich pods are
used as fodder and their value is all the more important as they are available during dry periods.
Prosopis juliflora foliage is well accepted by wildlife and livestock. Mesquite is a N-fixing legume
and it provides shade and shelter and is used in windbreaks and shelterbelts.
CLIMATIC HITS DESTROY VEGETATION ACROSS THAR
Me
squ
ite (D
ev
i): Pro
sop
is Juliflo
ra
Ph.D Scholar Collage of Agronomy & Biotechnology China Agricultural University Beijing [email protected] [email protected]
Mes
qu
ite
(De
vi):
Pro
sop
is J
ulif
lora
1
Mesquite (Devi): Prosopis Juliflora A potential source of livelihood in Thar
Classification
LOCAL NAME: Devi
COMMON NAMES: Mesquite, Meskit, Ironwood, Cashaw, Bayarone, Algaroba, Prosópis,
Algarroba, Algarrobo, Cují Negro, Trupillo, Sudjoe, Vilayati Kikar, Kabuli
Kikar, Vilayati Babul (USDA, 2010; Ecocrop, 2010)
SCIENTIFIC NAME: Prosopis juliflora
FAMILY NAME: Leguminosae or Fabaceae
Introduction
Thar Desert is very rich in biodiversity with arid climatic environments of the region suitable
for adaptation of different species in the region. But, extreme weather conditions like low
and erratic rainfall, low temperature, high temperatures, strong winds and low humidity
makes it inhospitable to different habitats leaving to migration and loss of habitats in the
region. Recent climatic hits of low temperature in Thar regions negatively affected the natural
resources of Thar especially Devi (Prosopis juliflora) and caused complete desiccation of the
tree, it in one of the major source for fodder for animal during the famine situations. Some
of the advantages of this tree are attributed in this report. Prosopis juliflora is more sensitive
to cold weather and frost but have the ability to cope with hot, dry situations.
Mes
qu
ite
(De
vi):
Pro
sop
is J
ulif
lora
2
PLANT DESCRIPTION
Mesquite: (Devi) Prosopis juliflora: is one of the 44 species of Prosopis, it is an evergreen
leguminous tree, typical of arid and semi-arid regions, growing up to 10-15 m high. The crown
is large and the canopy is open. Mesquite is a phreatophyte (Ecoport, 2010) and has a deep
taproot, growing downwards in search of water tables (down to 35 m depth), with well-
developed lateral roots competing with grasses. The stems are green-brown, twisted and
flexible. They have long and strong thorns (1.2-5 cm long), though some varieties are
thornless. Leaves are pinnately compound with 13-25 pairs leaflets arranged on 1 or
sometimes 2 pairs of pendulous rachis. Leaflets are oblong (3-16 mm long x 1.5-3 mm broad)
(Ecoport, 2010). Flowers are light greenish-yellow, arranged in cylindrical spikes 5-10 cm long
and 1.5 cm wide. Fruits are flattened, curved, indehiscent pods (4 mm thick, 1-1.5 cm wide
and 15-20 cm long) (Ecoport, 2010). Pods are
straw-coloured and contain a fleshy and sugary
mesocarp (Göhl, 1982). The pods contain 10-20
seeds that are 2-8 mm long (FAO, 2010). There is
a wide range of mesquite varieties.
P. juliflora was introduced into Sindh, Pakistan in 1857 (at that time Pakistan was part of un-
divided India) of during the late 19th century, possibly from Mexico or Jamaica (Luna, 1996).
Initial purpose of the introduction of this exotic species in sub-continent was sand dunes
stabilization, which was followed by various Governments of Pakistan in 1950s and 1960s. In
1970s, it was planted in Gwadar district, Baluchistan for the control of sand dunes movement.
Gradually, from Southern Sindh it spreads in many parts of Sindh, Punjab and Baluchistan
provinces.
Adoptability
Mesquite is xerophytic and is adapted to many soil types under a wide range of moisture
conditions (Orwa et al., 2009). The value of the tree lies in its exceptional tolerance of heat,
drought (8 months and even longer) and marginal soils. It
A Phreatophyte is a deep-rooted plant that obtains a significant portion of the water that it needs from the phreatic zone (zone of saturation) or the capillary fringe above the phreatic zone.
Note: It is sensitive to cold weather and frost.
Mes
qu
ite
(De
vi):
Pro
sop
is J
ulif
lora
3
tolerates strongly saline soils or alkaline soils. It also withstands seasonal waterlogging (Orwa
et al., 2009). Droughts during flowering periods may affect flower and pods production
(Ecoport, 2010). Irrigation during flowering period triples or quadruples pods yields in Brazil
(Riveros, 1992).
Uses
Mesquite is a N-fixing legume and it provides shade and shelter and is used in windbreaks
and shelterbelts, but it should be avoided in irrigated areas since it is a potential host to
pathogenic nematodes (Ecoport, 2010). Thanks to its ability to grow on saline and alkaline
soils, mesquite is valued as soil reclaimer (As it has ability to fix atmospheric nitrogen in plant
usable form) in very poor, degraded lands, rocky soils or abandoned copper mines. It is also
useful for stabilizing dunes on coastal zones and bunds around mangrove creeks (van der
Maesen et al., 1997). Mesquite has an overall positive effect on soil: N, sulphur, organic
matter and soluble salts are increased threefold within the upper 4.5 m of soil under mesquite
(Ecoport, 2010).
The protein and sugar-rich pods are used as fodder and their value is all the more important
as they are available during dry periods (van der Maesen et al., 1997). Mesquite foliage is well
accepted by wildlife and livestock but the green leaves are not very palatable and the cattle
eat only the buds and immature pods. Direct browsing of the foliage may reduce tree
development (Mendes, 1988).
Mes
qu
ite
(De
vi):
Pro
sop
is J
ulif
lora
4
Forage management
Pods production begins 3 years after planting. The average yield per tree is about 10-50 kg
pods/year and can be collected from May-June and September-October (Sawal et al., 2004).
Pod harvest is an easy but costly manual operation. Pods are stored in wood-lined or brick-
built houses or in layers of sand (Silva, 1988a). Pods may be stored for several years but are
very susceptible to to insect attack, requiring treatment of the storage houses with
insecticidal dust or fumigation (Ffolliot et al., 1983).
PODS
Mesquite pods are palatable feeds and rich sources
of energy for ruminants due to their digestible
carbohydrate content. They can replace part of the
diet grains (Sawal et al., 2004).
More than 10 % of ground dried Prosopis
juliflora pods in post weaning piglets had
detrimental effects on growth rate and the feed
conversion ratio linearly increased with the
inclusion rate of the pods (Silva et al., 1988).
Cattle, sheep and goats browse the pods in the
fields, snatching them before they drop or picking up the dry ones from the ground. The
animals can also graze the dry grasses of low nutritive value found within the mesquite stand.
The pods can also be collected and fed to stalled livestock, whole or processed, alone or as
part of a ration and fresh or after storage. Processed pods are more digestible and ground
pods have a better dietary value. Processing comprises the pounding, grinding or milling of
pods, either as a single process producing a whole pod extract, or with some separation of
pod parts and further processing of each fraction. Processing usually involves milling of whole
pods into a homogeneous, coarse flour, although in some cases exocarp and mesocarp (pulp)
are separated from the endocarp and seed.
RUMINANTS are mammals that
are able to acquire nutrients from
plant-based food by fermenting it
in a specialized stomach prior to
digestion, principally through
bacterial actions. The process
typically requires regurgitation of
fermented ingesta (known
as cud), and chewing it again. The
process of rechewing the cud to
further break down plant matter
and stimulate digestion is called
"Rumination". The word
"ruminant" comes from the
Latin ruminare, which means "to
chew over again".
Mes
qu
ite
(De
vi):
Pro
sop
is J
ulif
lora
5
Pasiecznik et al., (2001) reported that cattle rations containing less than 50% Prosopis
juliflora pods lead to no adverse effects on consumption, digestibility, nutrient balance and
animal health. Lower inclusion rates of 15-25 % are recommended in sheep and goats. In all
ruminants’ species, inclusion rates higher than 50-60 % may cause toxicity problems due to
the presence of cytotoxic alkaloids.
POD HUSKS
In arid regions of India, Prosopis juliflora pod husks could be included at 50 % in the
concentrate (with colocyinth seed cake (Citrullus colocynthis)) fed to Marwari sheep without
adverse effect on animal health (Mathur et al., 2002).
FOLIAGE
Foliage of Prosopis juliflora is generally unpalatable, which
severely limits its use as fodder. However, animals will
browse the foliage during dry seasons or droughts when no other forage sources are
available. The palatability in decreasing order is goats (more palatable) > sheep > camels >
horses (unpalatable). This unpalatability
may be caused by the presence of
condensed tannins. It increases with leaf
age and low-tannin leaf buds and young
leaves are more palatable. Dry, fallen
leaves appear to regain some palatability,
and livestock, particularly goats, are often
seen foraging under tree canopies. Leaves have been mixed with other feeds as a cheap
supplement to decrease feed costs while maintaining intake and live weight gains (Pasiecznik
et al., 2001). In India, incorporation of Prosophis juliflora foliage was possible but reduced
intake at levels above 10% of the total feed (Shukla et al., 1984 cited by Pasiecznik et al.,
2001).
UNPALATABLE: something that tastes really bad, like a glass of unsweetened lemonade
TANNIN (also known as vegetable tannin, natural organic tannins or sometimes tannoid, i.e. a type of biomolecule, as opposed to modern synthetic tannin) is an astringent, bitter plant polyphenolic compound that binds to and precipitates proteins and various other organic compounds including amino acids and alkaloids.
Mes
qu
ite
(De
vi):
Pro
sop
is J
ulif
lora
6
Several authors have reported in the past that Prosopis juliflora leaves are highly digestible.
However, recent in vitro DM digestibility data are in the 56-59 % range (Pasiecznik et al.,
2001).
SEEDS
Pigs fed on rations containing 70% sun-dried seeds in Hawaii gained 595 g/day (Göhl, 1982).
Prosopis juliflora flour included at up to 50% in growing finishing pigs had no effect on growth
performance and carcass quality (Lima Filho et al., 1998).
DIGESTIBILITY
Results from early trials found that Prosopis juliflora pods were highly digestible. Reported
values in Peru were 83 and 80 % for DM and protein respectively (Barros et al., 1988).
Livestock
DAIRY CATTLE
Feed comprising Prosopis pods have been recommended for lactating animals and have be
said to increase milk production. No effects on milk flavour were noted at less than 50% pods
in the ration, though as a only feed some taste change has been suggested (Pasiecznik et al.,
2001). A study result from the 1950s mentioned that pods were used in concentrate rations
for dairy cows at 40-60 % inclusion rates. Another report claimed that pods were particularly
used in dairy rations in Hawai, where it replaced concentrates such as cottonseed meal (Silva,
1988a). Prosopis juliflora pod flour could replace up to 60 % of wheat bran in rations for
lactating cows and that dry matter intake, weight gain and milk production increased with
increasing proportion of pod flour. The most economic ration was the one with 60 % mesquite
pod replacing wheat bran (Silva, 1988a). In Colombia, the use of mesquite pods reduced the
postpartum interval and increased the weight in dual-purpose cows (Roncallo, 2002). In India,
inclusion of up to 30 % pods in the diet maintained dairy performance (Talpada et al., 1988).
BEEF AND GROWING CATTLE
Mes
qu
ite
(De
vi):
Pro
sop
is J
ulif
lora
7
Entire replacement of wheat bran by ground pods was found favorable for beef cattle in
Brazil, (Silva, 1988a). Several trials in India have shown that the inclusion of Prosopis
juliflora pods could sustain cattle growth. Diets containing up to 45% Prosopis juliflora pods
(1.5 % of body weight) gave acceptable live weight gains (Shukla et al., 1984). Prosopis
juliflora pods could be fed to 9-month crossbred heifers up to 20 % in the diet (replacing rice
polishings) without adverse effect on growth and reproductive performances (Pandya et al.,
2005). Similar results were obtained at 20 % level in growing crossbred calves (Talpada et al.,
2002).
SHEEP
Many trials have found that part of the grains or forage in sheep diets could be replaced
efficiently with Prosopis juliflora pods (Obeidat et al., 2008). In Mexico, Prosopis juliflora pod
flour could replace up to 45 % of sorghum grain while increasing weight gain and was cost-
effective at that substitution rate. 60 % substitution had a depressive effect on gain (Buzo et
al., 1972, cited by Silva, 1988a). In Jordan, feeding fattening Awassi lambs diets containing up
to 20 % (replacing barley) did not affect growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and
carcass and meat characteristics while being cost effective (Obeidat et al., 2008). A similar
study found that nutrient intake, digestibility, growth rate, and feed efficiency improved
when pods were included at 15-25 % (replacing barley and maize grain) but that animal
performance decreased when pods were included at 35-45 % in the diet (Abdullah et al.,
2004). Replacement of 30 % and 45 % of sugarcane molasses by mesquite pods gave the
highest weight gains In Brazil (Barros, 1981, cited by Silva, 1988a).
Grinding and heating had not effect on voluntary intake of Prosopis juliflora pods fed alone,
but ground pods associated with Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum) were eaten in greater
volume than whole pods (Silva, 1988a). In Northeast Brazil, Prosopis juliflora pods was found
to be a very practical and economical option for feeding sheep in the dry season (Oliveira,
2009). The substitution of Napier grass silage by up to 45 % Prosopis juliflora pods had a
positive effect on dry matter intake, weight gain and economic performance (Almeida et al.,
2008).
Mes
qu
ite
(De
vi):
Pro
sop
is J
ulif
lora
8
GOATS
Prosopis juliflora pods have been tested in arid zone countries to feed goats. In Oman, a diet
containing 20 % pods improved feed intake, feed conversion and body weight gain without
compromising carcass yield or quality. However, intake and gain dropped sharply when pods
where included at 30 % (Mahgoub et al., 2005b). In the drylands of India, up to 35 % Prosopis
juliflora pod flour included in the diet of goats in late lactation maintained weight gain, blood
parameters and milk yield (Mathur et al., 2003).
Pigs
There are few references about the use of Prosopis juliflora pods and seed flour in pig
feeding. Seeds and seed flour seem to be a better feed than pods.
Poultry
BROILERS
A maximum incorporation level of 20 % has been reported by several studies. Prosopis
juliflora pods could partially replace maize and could be offered up to 20 % in the diet (with
enzyme supplementation). 30 % increased the feed conversion ratio and the feed cost per kg
(Choudhary et al., 2005). Broilers fed a diets containing 20 % had the highest live body weight,
body weight gain and the best feed conversion (Al-beitawi et al., 2010). A 10 % inclusion rate
did not have any adverse effects on performance in starter and finisher diets (Vanker et al.,
1998)
EGG LYING HENS
7.5-14 % Prosopis juliflora pods are recommended in egg layer hens diets. Prosopis
juliflora pod meal was used to replace up to 100% of wheat bran (7.5 % of the diet) in rations
for egg laying hens with no effect on intake, feed conversion ratio or egg weight (Riveros,
1992). The inclusion of mesquite pod meal up to 13.6% in isonitrogen and isoenergy diets did
not adversely affect egg laying hen’s performance, but a 30 % inclusion level reduced egg and
Mes
qu
ite
(De
vi):
Pro
sop
is J
ulif
lora
9
mass weights and affected feed to egg mass ratio. A TME value of 11.8 MJ/kg DM was
determined (Silva et al., 2002b).
LAYING QUAILS
Prosopis juliflora pod meal could be included up to 15% in partial maize replacement of iso-
nitrogen and iso-energy diets without an adverse effect on laying hens quail performance. A
25 % inclusion level reduced feed intake and egg mass (Silva et al., 2002a).
Rabbits
Little information exists about the use of Prosopis juliflora in rabbits. It was possible to use
mesquite pods up to 25% without problems in the diets of growing rabbits (Castillo Guerrero,
1979). In a trial where ground pods and pericaps were both included at 30%, Dry matter
digestibility was rather low for pods (45 %) and higher for the pericarp (67 %) while protein
digestibility was high and similar for both products (72 and 76 % respectively). N-corrected
ME was 7.7 MJ/kg Dry matter for pods and 12.0 MJ/kg DM for the pericarp (Silva et al., 1990).
Horses and donkeys
Prosopis juliflora pods are well appreciated by horses and mules, who can consume between
2 to 6 kg/day or 1.2 kg/100 kg W. Prosopis juliflora pod meal could replace 100% of maize
cob meal (75 % of diet dry matter) in mares without altering dry matter intake, though non
digestible food (NDF) digestibility was affected (Stein et al., 2005).
Fish culture
ROHU (LABEO ROHITA)
Mes
qu
ite
(De
vi):
Pro
sop
is J
ulif
lora
10
Hydrothermically processed Prosopis juliflora seed meal fed to
rohu (Labeo rohita) fingerlings resulted in better growth than
raw seed meal. However, diets where 50% of fish meal were
replaced by Prosopis juliflora seed meal depressed growth,
carcass composition, digestive enzyme activity and digestibility
even when the seeds were processed by soaking or
autoclaving, so Prosopis juliflora seed meal should be
incorporated in rohu diets at inclusion levels lower than 30 % (Bhatt et al., 2010).
Apiculture
Prosopis juliflora is a valuable honey plant: bees are fond of Prosopis juliflora flowers and
the flowering lasts almost year-round (van der Maesen et al., 1997; FAO, 2010). Prosopis
juliflora a is a major honey source in Bolivia, Jamaica, Pakistan, Western Australia and
elsewhere. In Sri Lanka, it is one of the most important species for bee forage due to its very
copious nectar flow.
Food
Rich, delicious flour can be made from Pulverized pods from which seeds have been removed.
Cotyledons and embryos when pulverized yield a flour rich in protein and sugar appropriate
for diabetic people. There are reports that P. juliflora pods are used in preparing bread,
sweets, syrup and coffee. The pods must be processed to improve the flavour. Sugars and
sweeteners can be produced from the pods.
FUEL
The generally crooked stems and branches make good firewood and provide excellent
charcoal. Charcoal from P. juliflora wood is used extensively in the USA as barbecue fuel;
about 30% of the charcoal sold for this purpose originates from P. juliflora from the Sonora
ROHU (LABEO ROHITA,)
is a species of fish of
the carp family, found
in rivers in South Asia.
It is a non-oily/white
fish.
Mes
qu
ite
(De
vi):
Pro
sop
is J
ulif
lora
11
Desert in northern Mexico. In Pakistan its charcol has been extensively used in Kilns of poultry
farms during winter season.
FIBER
There is a large potential for P. juliflora as a source for fiber in the production of paper,
paperboard and hardboard.
TIMBER
Seasoned wood is used for fence posts, furniture, crafts and corrals. It is rarely used in
construction, as most tree trunks are not long or straight enough.
GUM OR RESIN
P. Juliflora heartwood contains significant amounts of extractable polyphenolic compounds
from which can be isolated a unique flavinol compound used in the formation of new phenol-
formaldehyde polymeric resins. A reddish-amber gum, similar in properties to the gum arabic
produced by Acacia senegal, often exudes from the stem and older branches.
TANNIN OR DYESTUFF
Tannin or dyestuff can be extracted from P. Juliflora but the yield is only about 10%. Tannin
could also be extracted as a byproduct when P. juliflora wood is processed for other purposes,
such as animal rations.
MEDICINE
P. Juliflora syrup prepared from ground pods has various medicinal values. It is given to
children showing weight deficiency or retardation in motor development, the syrup is
believed to increase lactation. It is also used for preparing various medicinal syrups, articularly
for expectorants. Tea made from P. Juliflora is thought to be good for digestive disturbances
and skin lesions.
Mes
qu
ite
(De
vi):
Pro
sop
is J
ulif
lora
12
SERVICES
EROSION CONTROL
P. Juliflora has been used to arrest wind erosion and stabilize sand dunes on coastal areas. It
is listed as on the tree species used in sand-dune stabilization in India.
SHADE OR SHELTER
Planted in windbreaks and shelterbelts.
RECLAMATION
Widely planted for land reclamation because it is an aggressive colonizer, tolerant of very
poor, degraded, saline and alkaline soils.
NITROGEN FIXING
P. Juliflora moderately enriches the soil with atmospheric nitrogen obtained through
symbiosis with cowpea-type Rhizobium. The roots also form mycorrhizal associations with
Glomus fungi. Plants with both Rhizobium and mycorrhizal associations show significantly
higher nitrogen fixation rates than those lacking the mycorrhiza.
SOIL IMPROVER
Total nitrogen, sulphur and soluble salts, as well as organic matter, have been shown to
increase 3-fold in the upper 4.5 m of soil under P. juliflora.
Mes
qu
ite
(De
vi):
Pro
sop
is J
ulif
lora
13
INTERCROPPING
The best species to grow in association with P. Juliflora are Cenchrus ciliaris, Opuntia spp. and
Pancium maximum.
ORNAMENTAL
P. Juliflora is used to line urban motorways. However, its thorns pose problems for pruning
and maintenance.
SAND DUNE FIXATION
Its role as dune fixer has been established in arid and semiarid areas of Pakistan Dune fixation
could further control the unsupervised growth of dust storm.
Potential constraints
In spite of these qualities, Prosopis juliflora is considered as a noxious weed in many parts
of the world, since it naturalizes easily and competes strongly with other species. In Thar
(Pakistan), sheep farmers have to face the problem of the infestation by Prosopis
juliflora bushes of grazing areas that are already scarce (Dinesh et al., 2003). It is possible to
control Prosopis juliflora by regular pruning and turn it into a valuable tree that is less
agressive to grasses or crops. Removing the poorly nutritive side branches results in smaller
roots and more efficient water utilization (Elfadl et al., 2003). Grazing of Prosopis juliflora
stands is another way to control its growth (Riveros, 1992).
Propsopis juliflora, an invasive species in the arid and semi-arid areas of Pakistan. This
complex plant has become a major factor for eliminating the habitat of many indigenous
species at a catastrophic level. As reported by experts, Prosopis juliflora is in IUCN's
new list of 100 world’s worst invasive alien species.
Mes
qu
ite
(De
vi):
Pro
sop
is J
ulif
lora
14
With profound experience of people around the globe, it is almost impossible to terminate
the growth of this plant, as it spreads widely in most of the arid and semi-arid areas of the
world, especially in Southern Pakistan.
The efforts to eradicate or control its dispersion are completely failed. Generally, perception
of both public and governments about this plant is quite negative and its most often treated
as an `evil plant`. On the contrary, it has been established from the recent literature that this
species has been quite useful commercially as fuel wood in many areas of Southern Sindh of
Pakistan. Beside its popular use as dune fixer its products has been used extensively for
various applications such as forage plant, gum, glucose, furniture, char-coal and bio-char
around the world. Recently, its role has been established to combat desertification and
control of climate change (Kazmi et al., 2010).
TOXIC COMPOUNDS
Prosopis juliflora pods contain cytotoxic alkaloids that may cause intoxications to cattle,
horses, sheep and goats in diets containing high levels of pods (>50 %). Problems have been
reported in the USA, Peru and Brazil (Silva et al., 2007; Tabosa et al., 2006; Camara et al.,
2009). Poisonings were also recorded from pods eaten after exposure to rain (Göhl, 1982).
Goats and cattle fed with diets containing 60-90 % and 50-75 % Prosopis juliflora pods
respectively suffered mandibular tremors during chewing due to toxicity to neurons of certain
cranial nerve nuclei (Tabosa et al., 2000; Tabosa et al., 2006). In another series of outbreaks
in Brazil, the main clinical signs were progressive weight loss, atrophy of the masseter
muscles, dropped jaw, tongue protrusion, difficulties in prehending food, tilting the head
during mastigation or rumination, salivation, impaired swallowing, and decreased tone of the
tongue (Camara et al., 2009). Neuronal lesions result in difficulties in prehending and
chewing; it subsequently causes feed wastes and animal death (Tabosa et al., 2006). In India,
goats offered dry Prosopis juliflora pods as sole feed during 4 days suffered from partial
anorexia, depression, salivation, twitching, dehydration and bloody diarrhoea. Prosopis
juliflora had deleterious effects on heamoglobin, ruminal pH, ruminal bacterial count and
Mes
qu
ite
(De
vi):
Pro
sop
is J
ulif
lora
15
caused total ruminal protozoa disappearance. There was a significant decline in blood pH and
increase in blood urea nitrogen. Histopathological studies revealed necrotic lesions in the
liver, degenerative changes in renal tubules and rarefaction of lymphoid tissue (Misri et al.,
2003).
Nutritional attributes
PODS, SEEDS AND POD HUSKS
PODS
Prosopis juliflora pods have a relatively high nutritional value. They contain about 10-15 %
dry matter of crude protein, 20-30 % DM of crude fibre and 16-41 % of total sugars (75 %
saccharose) (Sawal et al., 2004). Pod composition is quite variable and pods from India and
Africa appear to have lower levels of desirable carbohydrates and higher levels of unwanted
fibre than pods from Peru and Brazil (Pasiecznik et al., 2001). The sugar content make them
palatable to ruminants, pigs, poultry, equines and other animals (Sawal et al., 2004).
SEED
The seeds contain up to 30-40 % protein and much less fibre (3-7 %) than the pods (Sawal et
al., 2004).
POD HUSK
Pod husks have also been occasionnally used as feed. They are poor in protein (4 % Dry
matter) and rich in crude fiber (54 % dry matter) (Mathur et al., 2002).
LEAVES
Fresh leaves contain about 17-20 % protein and 22 % crude fibre (Lima, 1994). They are rich
in lysine but deficient in methionine and cystine (van der Maesen et al., 1997). The hay
contains about 14 % protein (Mendes, 1988).
Mes
qu
ite
(De
vi):
Pro
sop
is J
ulif
lora
16
Tables of chemical composition and nutritional value
MESQUITE (PROSOPIS JULIFLORA), FRUIT PULP
Main analysis Unit Avg
Crude protein % DM 7.7
Crude fibre % DM 12.0
Ether extract % DM 0.6
Ash % DM 2.3
Gross energy MJ/kg DM 18.0
SOURCE: Imperial Bureau of Animal Nutrition, 1936
MESQUITE (PROSOPIS JULIFLORA), LEAVES, FRESH
Main analysis Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb
Dry matter % as fed 36.7 32.2 41.2 2
Crude protein % DM 16.9 4.6 11.7 20.1 3
Crude fibre % DM 26.9 9.0 21.6 37.3 3
Ether extract % DM 3.1 0.5 2.7 3.6 3
Ash % DM 8.9 1.4 7.7 10.5 3
Gross energy MJ/kg DM
18.4 *
MINERALS UNIT AVG SD MIN MAX
Calcium g/kg DM 17.0 4.7 11.7 20.8
Phosphorus g/kg DM 2.0 0.3 1.7 2.2
Potassium g/kg DM 15.1 14.1 16.0
Mes
qu
ite
(De
vi):
Pro
sop
is J
ulif
lora
17
Magnesium g/kg DM 4.2 2.3 6.0
SOURCE
CIRAD, 1991; Russell, 1947 MESQUITE (PROSOPIS JULIFLORA), POD HUSKS
MAIN ANALYSIS UNIT AVG
Crude protein % DM 4.3
Crude fibre % DM 54.3
Ether extract % DM 0.6
Ash % DM 3.4
Gross energy MJ/kg DM 19.2*
The asterisk * indicates that the average value was obtained by an equation.
SOURCE: Imperial Bureau of Animal Nutrition, 1936
Mes
qu
ite
(De
vi):
Pro
sop
is J
ulif
lora
18
MESQUITE (PROSOPIS JULIFLORA), PODS, DRY
Main analysis Unit Avg SD Min Max
Dry matter % as fed 94.1 1.8 92.7 97.2
Crude protein % DM 12.5 0.9 11.1 13.9
Crude fibre % DM 21.2 4.8 16.8 27.7
NDF % DM 46.3 40.2 52.3
ADF % DM 37.3 31.7 42.8
Lignin % DM 5.7
Ether extract % DM 2.8 1.2 1.3 4.3
Ash % DM 3.6 1.6 0.4 4.8
Gross energy MJ/kg DM 18.8*
MINERALS UNIT AVG SD MIN MAX
Calcium g/kg DM 4.5 2.0 2.3 7.0
Phosphorus g/kg DM 1.5 0.3 1.0 1.7
Potassium g/kg DM 15.2 1.2 13.9 16.0
Magnesium g/kg DM 1.1 0.1 1.1 1.2
Manganese mg/kg DM 22 11 33
Zinc mg/kg DM 18 16 20
Copper mg/kg DM 4 4 5
Mes
qu
ite
(De
vi):
Pro
sop
is J
ulif
lora
19
AMINO ACIDS UNIT AVG
Arginine % protein 13.3
Cystine % protein 1.2
Glycine % protein 4.4
Histidine % protein 2.7
Isoleucine % protein 2.7
Leucine % protein 6.6
Lysine % protein 4.0
Methionine % protein 1.0
Phenylalanine % protein 3.5
Threonine % protein 2.4
Tryptophan % protein 1.1
Tyrosine % protein 2.3
Valine % protein 3.5
SECONDARY METABOLITES UNIT AVG
Tannins (eq. tannic acid) g/kg DM 7.6
Tannins, condensed (eq. catechin)
g/kg DM 1.9
SOURCES: Barman et al., 2006; CIRAD, 1991; Groenewald et al., 1967; Habit et al., 1988; Mahgoub et al., 2005
Mes
qu
ite
(De
vi):
Pro
sop
is J
ulif
lora
20
MESQUITE (PROSOPIS JULIFLORA), SEEDS
Main analysis Unit Avg Min Max
Dry matter % as fed 88.4
Crude protein % DM 50.5 35.8 65.2
Crude fibre % DM 4.5 2.8 6.1
Ether extract % DM 6.2 4.5 7.8
Ash % DM 4.5 3.7 5.2
Gross energy MJ/kg DM 21.1*
The asterisk * indicates that the average value was obtained by an equation.
SOURCES
Habit et al., 1988; Imperial Bureau of Animal Nutrition, 1936
References
Abdullah, A. Y. ; Abdel Hafes, B. Y., 2004. Inclusion of Prosopis juliflora pods in finishing
Awassi lamb diets. Proc. 11th AAAP Animal Science Congress, vol. 2, pp. 373–375.
Al-Beitawi, N. A. ; Awawdeh, F. T. ; Khwaileh, M. M., 2010. Preliminary study on Prosopis
juliflora pods as unconventional feed ingredient in diets of broiler chicks. Anim. Nutr.
Feed Technol., 10 (1): 51-60
Almeida, P. J. P. ; Pereira, M. L. A. ; Silva, T. V. B. S. ; Pereira, T. C. J. ; Santos, A. B. ; Santos, E.
J. ; Oliveira, L. N. ; Azevedo, S. T. ; Augu, C., 2008. Economic performance of santa
inês sheep fed with meskit (Prosopis juliflora) pod meal. Zootech 2008, 26 a 30 de
maio de 2008 João Pessoa, PB - UFPB/ABZ
Barman, K. ; Rai, S. N., 2006. Utilization of tanniniferous feeds. 1. Chemical composition,
tannin fractionation, amino acid and mineral profiles and in vitro digestibility of
certain Indian agro-industrial byproducts. Indian J. Anim. Sci., 76 (1): 71-80
Barros, N. A. M. T. de; Filho, J. L. de Q., 1988. Effect of progressive replacement of molasses
by Prosopis juliflora (Sw) DC pods in ruminant rations. In: Habit, M. A.; Saavedra, J.
Mes
qu
ite
(De
vi):
Pro
sop
is J
ulif
lora
21
C., 1988. The current state of knowledge on Prosopis juliflora. FAO, Plant Production
and Protection Division, Rome
Barros, N. A. M. T., 1981. Effects of progressive substitution of molasses by algaroba pods
(Prosopis juliflora (Sw) DC) in ruminant diets. M. Sc. Thesis. Areia, Universidade
Federal da Paraíba, Centro de Ciencias Agrárias, 97 p.
Bhatt, S. S. ; Chovatiya, S. G. ; Shah, A. R., 2010. Evaluation of raw and hydrothermically
processed Prosopis julifloraseed meal as supplementary feed for the growth of Labeo
rohita fingerlings. Aquacult. Nutr.,
Buzo, J. ; Avila, R. ; Bravo, F. O., 1972. Effect of progressive substitution of sorghum per
mezquite pods in sheep feeding. Técnica Pecuária en México, DF, 20: 23-27
Cabral, C. R. Jr. ; E. C. Miranda, C. R. ; Amorim, E. P. R. ; Silva, D. A. ; Guimarães, I. G. ; Miranda,
C. C., 2006. Post-harvesting conservation of Prosopis juliflora's pods in Alagoas. Arch.
Zootec., 55 (209): 117-120
Camara, A. C. L. ; Costa, N. de A. ; Riet-Correa, F. ; Afonso, J. A. B. ; Dantas, A. F. M. ;
Mendonca, C. L. de ; Souza, M. I. de, 2009. Spontaneous poisoning in cattle by
mesquite beans, Prosopis juliflora (Leg. Mimosoideae) in Pernambuco. Pesq. Vet.
Bras., 29 (3): 233-240
Castillo Guerrero, A., 1979. Use of different amounts of pods of mesquite [Prosopis juliflora]
in feeds for rabbits. Prof. Thesis, UNAM, Mexico City, 23 pp.
Choudhary, R. S. ; Vaishnav, J. K. ; Nehra, R., 2005. Effect of replacing maize with mesquite
pods (Prosopis juliflora) on the performance of broilers. Indian J. Poult. Sci., 40 (2):
124-127
Dinesh, K. ; Kumar, D., 2003. A study on problems encountered in sheep rearing in Rajasthan.
Indian J. Small Rumin., 9 (1): 43-46
Ecoport, 2010. Ecoport database. Ecoport
Elfadl, M. A. ; Luukanen, O., 2003. Effect of pruning on Prosopis juliflora: considerations for
tropical dryland agroforestry. J. Arid Environ. 53: 441–455
FAO, 2010. Grassland Index. A searchable catalogue of grass and forage legumes. FAO
Ffolliot, P. F. ; Thames, J. L., 1983. Collection, handling, storage and pre-treatment of
Prosopis seeds in Latin America. FAO, Rome
Göhl, B., 1982. Les aliments du bétail sous les tropiques. FAO, Division de Production et Santé
Animale, Roma, Italy
Groenewald, J. W. ; Joubert, D. M. ; Tolken, H., 1967. The chemical composition of South
African fodder plants. Proc. A. Afr. Soc. Anim. Prod. 6: 117-128
Mes
qu
ite
(De
vi):
Pro
sop
is J
ulif
lora
22
Habit, M. A. ; Saavedra, J. C., 1988. The current state of knowledge on Prosopis juliflora. FAO,
Plant Production and Protection Division, Rome
Heuzé V., Tran G., Boval M., Renaudeau D., 2013. Mesquite (Prosopis juliflora). Feedipedia.org. A programme by INRA, CIRAD, AFZ and FAO. http://www.feedipedia.org/node/554 Last updated on November 28, 2013, 14:15
Imperial Bureau of Animal Nutrition, 1936. Composition of some African foods and feeding
stuffs mainly of vegetable origin. Technical Communication No. 6, Rowett Institute,
Aberdeen, p. 32
Kazmi S.J. 2010. Ecological and Socio-economic Evaluation of the Use of Prosopis juliflora for
Bio-char Production in Pakistan Drynet Science & Technology Page: 1-54
Lima Filho, H. L. de; Costa, A. N. ; Carvalho Reis, J. de, 1998. Effect of different levels of
mesquite flour Prosopis juliflora(Sw) D.C. in the diet on productive parameters of
male crossbred swine. Ciencia Veterinaria nos Tropicos, 1 (2): 81-87
LUNA, R. K. (1996) Prosopis juliflora (Swartz) DC. In:Plantation Trees. International Book
Distributors, Delhi,India.
Mahgoub, O. ; Kadim, I. T. ; Forsberg, N. E. ; Al-Ajmi, D. S. ; Al-Saqry, N. M. ; Al-Abri, A. S. ;
Annamalai, K., 2005b. Evaluation of Meskit (Prosopis juliflora) pods as a feed for
goats. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 121 (3): 319-327
Mahgoub, O. ; Kadim, I. T. ; Johnson, E. H. ; Srikandakumar, A. ; Al-Saqri, N. M. ; Al-Abri, A.
S. ; Ritchie, A., 2005. The use of a concentrate containing Meskit (Prosopis juliflora)
pods and date palm by-products to replace commercial concentrate in diets of Omani
sheep. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 120 (1-2): 33-41
Mathur, B. K. ; Siyak, S. R. ; Bohra, H. C., 2003. Feeding of mesquite (Prosopis juliflora) pods
powder to Marwari goats in arid region. Current Agriculture, 27 (1-2): 57-59
Mathur, B. K. ; Siyak, S. R. ; Shailesh Paharia, 2002. Incorporation of Prosopis juliflora pod
husk as ingredient of low cost ration for sheep in arid region. Current Agriculture, 26
(1-2): 95-98
Mendes, B. V., 1988. Prosopis in Brazil. In: The current state of knowledge on Prosopis
juliflora. Habit, M.A. and Saavedra, J.C. (Eds). FAO, Plant Production and Protection
Division, Rome
Misri, J. ; Vihan, V. S. ; Kumar, A., 2003. Toxicity studies on Prosopis juliflora in goats -
haematobiochemical and pathological profile. Indian J. Anim. Sci., 73 (4): 349-352
Obeidat, B. S. ; Abdullah, A. Y. ; Al-Lataifeh, F. A., 2008. The effect of partial replacement of
barley grains by Prosopis juliflora pods on growth performance, nutrient intake,
Mes
qu
ite
(De
vi):
Pro
sop
is J
ulif
lora
23
digestibility, and carcass characteristics of Awassi lambs fed finishing diets. Anim.
Feed Sci. Technol., 146 (1-2): 42-54
Oliveira, J. P. F. de, 2009. Algaroba (Prosopis juliflora): an alternative to feeding of sheep in
Northeastern Brazil. PUBVET, 3 (7)
Orwa, C. ; Mutua, A. ; Kindt, R. ; Jamnadass, R. ; Anthony, S., 2009. Agroforestree Database:
a tree reference and selection guide version 4.0. World Agroforestry Centre, Kenya
Pasiecznik, N. M. ; Felker, P. ; Harris, P. J. C. ; Harsh, L. N. ; Cruz, G. ; Tewari, J. C. ; Cadoret,
K. ; Maldonado, L. J., 2001. The Prosopis juliflora - Prosopis pallida complex: a
monograph. HDRA, Coventry, UK. pp. 172
Riveros, F., 1992. The genus Prosopis and its potential to improve livestock production. In:
Legume trees and other fodder trees as protein sources for livestock. Speedy, A.W.
and Pugliese, P.L. (Eds.), FAO, Animal Production and Health Paper. Rome. pp.257
Roncallo, B., 2002. Utilization of the fruits of native trees and shrubs for cattle feeding in the
subhumid tropics of Colombia. Seminario la Ganadería Bovina del siglo XXI.
Bucaramanga
Russell, F. C., 1947. The chemical composition and digestibility of fodder shrubs and trees.
In: The use and misuse of shrubs and trees as fodder. Imperial Agricultural Bureaux.
Joint Publication No. 10, 185-231
Sawal, R. K. ; Ram Ratan; Yadav, S. B. S., 2004. Mesquite (Prosopis juliflora) pods as a feed
resource for livestock - A review. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 17 (5): 719-725
Shukla, P. C. ; Talpada, P. M. ; Pande, M. B., 1984. Prosopis juliflora pods, a new cattle feed
source. Animal Nutrition Department, Gujarat Agricultural University, Anand, Gujrat,
India
Silva, A. M. de A. ; Pereira, J. A. A. ; Costa, P. M. A. ; Mello, H. V. de, 1989. Use of mesquite
(Prosopis juliflora) for feeding pigs. Rev. Bras. Zootec., 18 (2): 179-183
Silva, A. M. de A. ; Rodrigues, M. E. ; Silva, J. F. da, 1990. Nutritional value of mesquite beans
(Prosopis juliflora) in the diet of rabbits. Veterinaria e Zootecnia, 2: 9-16
Silva, A. M. M. ; Silva, A. R. ; Pinheiro, A. M. ; Freitas, S. R. V. B. ; Silva, V. D. A. ; Souza, C. S. ;
Hughes, J. B. ; El-Bachá, R. S. ; Costa, M. F. D. ; Velozo, E. S. ; Tardy, M. ; Costa, S. L.,
2007. Alkaloids from Prosopis juliflora leaves induce glial activation, cytotoxicity and
stimulate NO production.. Toxicon, 49 (5): 601-614
Silva, J. H. V. ; Silva, E. L. da; Filho, J. J. ; Toledo, R. S. ; Albino, L. F. T. ; Ribeiro, M. L. G. ; Couto,
H. P. C., 2002. Energy values and effects of integral mesquite pods (Prosopis
juliflora (Sw.) D.C.) meal inclusion in commercial laying hens diets. Rev. Bras. Zootec.,
31 (6): 2255-2264
Mes
qu
ite
(De
vi):
Pro
sop
is J
ulif
lora
24
Silva, J. H. V. da ; Oliveira, J. N. C. de ; Silva, E. L. da ; Jordao Filho, J. ; Ribeiro, M. L. G., 2002.
Use of integral mesquite (Prosopis juliflora (Sw.) D.C.) pods meal in the Japanese
quails feeding. Rev. Bras. Zootec., 31 (4): 1789-1794
Silva, M. de A., 1988. Botany, taxonomy and distribution of the Genus Prosopis L.. In: The
current state of knowledge on Prosopis juliflora. Habit, M.A. and Saavedra, J.C. (Eds).
FAO, Plant Production and Protection Division, Rome
Silva, S., 1988. Prosopis juliflora (Sw) DC in Brazil. in: The current state of knowledge on
Prosopis juliflora. Habit, M. A. and Saavedra, J. C. ed., 1988. FAO, Plant Production
and Protection Division, Rome
Stein, R. B. da S. ; Toledo, L. R. A. de; Almeida, F. Q. de; Arnaut, A. C. ; Patitucci, L. T. ; Soares
Neto, J. ; Costa, V. T. M. da, 2005. Effects of feeding mesquite pod meal (Prosopis
juliflora (Swartz) D.C.) for horses. Rev. Bras. Zootec., 34 (4): 1240-1247
Tabosa, I. M. ; Souza, J. C. ; Graca, D. L. ; Barbosa-Filho, J. M. ; Almeida, R. N. ; Rie Correa, F.,
2000. Neuronal vacuolation of the trigeminal nuclei in goats caused by ingestion
of Prosopis juliflora pods. Vet. Hum. Toxic., 42 (3): 155-158
Tabosa, I. M; Riet-Correa, F. ; Barros, S. S. ; Summers, B. A. ; Simões, S. V. D. ; Medeiros, R.
M. T. ; Nobre, V. M. T., 2006. Neurohistologic and ultrastructural lesions in cattle
experimentally intoxicated with the plant Prosopis juliflora. Vet. Pathol., 43: 695
Talpada, P. M. ; Pandya, P. R. ; Patel, G. R. ; Patel, D. C. ; Desai, M., 2002. Utilization of
complete feed using Prosopis juliflora pods as a ration of growing crossbred calves.
Indian J. Anim. Nutr., 19 (1): 1-6
Talpada, P. M. ; Shukla, P. C., 1988. Effect of feeding ground Prosopis juliflora pods to
lactating cows on feed and nutrients utilization for milk production. Indian J. Dairy
Sci., 41 (3): 274-279
van der Maesen, L. J. G. ; Oyen, L. P. A., 1997. Prosopis juliflora (Swartz) DC.. Record from
Proseabase. Faridah Hanum, I. and van der Maesen, L. J. G. (Editors). PROSEA (Plant
Resources of South-East Asia) Foundation, Bogor, Indonesia
Vanker, S. G. ; Talpada, P. M. ; Khanna, K., 1998. Feasibility of utilization of Prosopis
juliflora pods in broiler ration. Gujarat Agricultural University Research Journal, 23
(2): 91-96