Download - Douglas S Bagg II Week 5
![Page 1: Douglas S Bagg II Week 5](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070323/559b63be1a28ab0a258b4636/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Welcome to the Smith Middle School PTA
Meeting
Principal Mr. Douglas S. Bagg II
Assistant Principal Mrs. Mary Blackwell
![Page 2: Douglas S Bagg II Week 5](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070323/559b63be1a28ab0a258b4636/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Contact InformationOffice (386) 555 – 2301
Hours 7 AM to 4 PM
The receptionist will be able to direct your call or take messages for any staff or personnel here at
Smith Middle School.
Principal's email
Assistant principal’s email
![Page 3: Douglas S Bagg II Week 5](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070323/559b63be1a28ab0a258b4636/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Learning requirement and academic standards• Math
• All students in grades sixth, seventh, and eighth are required to score a level III or higher on the FCAT 2.0 Math test.
• Any student who does not achieve a level III or higher will need to attend remedial math in order to boost their mathematical understandings in order to achieve academic success.
• Reading
• All students in grades sixth, seventh, and eighth are required to score a level III or higher on the FCAT 2.0 Reading test.
• Any student who does not achieve a level III or higher will need to attend remedial math in order to boost their Reading skills and comprehension in order to achieve academic success.
![Page 4: Douglas S Bagg II Week 5](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070323/559b63be1a28ab0a258b4636/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Looking at FCAT scores in reading and math for the last five years
79 7771
66
51
8073 74
69
53
71
8275 74 76
2008 – 2009 2009 – 2010 2010 – 2011 2011 – 2012 2012 – 2013
Percent of students at Smith Middle School achieving a level III or higher on
FCAT reading 2.0
6th 7th 8th
0
![Page 5: Douglas S Bagg II Week 5](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070323/559b63be1a28ab0a258b4636/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
7877
79
72
66
7776
70
72
66
70
74
69
72
76
2008 – 2009 2009 – 2010 2010 – 2011 2011 – 2012 2012 – 2013
Percent of students In Columbia County achieving a level III or higher on FCAT reading 2.0
6th 7th 8th
![Page 6: Douglas S Bagg II Week 5](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070323/559b63be1a28ab0a258b4636/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
72
71
72
71
7070
74
72
71
70
67
71
69
70
73
2008 – 2009 2009 – 2010 2010 – 2011 2011 – 2012 2012 – 2013
Percent of students In the state of Florida achieving a level III or higher on FCAT reading 2.0
6th 7th 8th
![Page 7: Douglas S Bagg II Week 5](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070323/559b63be1a28ab0a258b4636/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
72 71 72 71 70
78 7779
72
66
7977
71
66
51
2008 – 2009 2009 – 2010 2010 – 2011 2011 – 2012 2012 – 2013
6th grade Comparison of state, district, and school percentage of level III and above on FCAT 2.0 reading
State District School
![Page 8: Douglas S Bagg II Week 5](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070323/559b63be1a28ab0a258b4636/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
7074
72 71 70
77 76
7072
66
80
73 74
69
53
2008 – 2009 2009 – 2010 2010 – 2011 2011 – 2012 2012 – 2013
7th grade Comparison of state, district, and school percentage of level III and above on FCAT 2.0 reading
State District School
![Page 9: Douglas S Bagg II Week 5](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070323/559b63be1a28ab0a258b4636/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
6771 69 70
7370
7469
7276
71
82
75 74 76
2008 – 2009 2009 – 2010 2010 – 2011 2011 – 2012 2012 – 2013
8th grade Comparison of state, district, and school percentage of level III and above on FCAT 2.0 reading
State District School
![Page 10: Douglas S Bagg II Week 5](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070323/559b63be1a28ab0a258b4636/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
82
82
86
75
56
77
79
76
72
58
62
66
67
68
68
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2008 – 2009
2009 – 2010
2010 – 2011
2011 – 2012
2012 – 2013
Percent of students at Smith Middle School achieving a level III or higher on FCAT 2.0 Math
8th 7th 6th
![Page 11: Douglas S Bagg II Week 5](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070323/559b63be1a28ab0a258b4636/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
83
80
85
79
63
74
74
73
70
68
61
62
59
60
72
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
2008 – 2009
2009 – 2010
2010 – 2011
2011 – 2012
2012 – 2013
Percent of students In Columbia County achieving a level III or higher on FCAT 2.0 Math
8th 7th 6th
![Page 12: Douglas S Bagg II Week 5](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070323/559b63be1a28ab0a258b4636/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
76
78
78
76
67
71
75
74
73
70
61
62
63
65
70
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
2008 – 2009
2009 – 2010
2010 – 2011
2011 – 2012
2012 – 2013
Percent of students In the state of Florida achieving a level III or higher on FCAT 2.0 Math
8th 7th 6th
![Page 13: Douglas S Bagg II Week 5](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070323/559b63be1a28ab0a258b4636/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
76
78
78
76
67
83
80
85
79
63
82
82
86
75
56
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2008 – 2009
2009 – 2010
2010 – 2011
2011 – 2012
2012 – 2013
Comparing state, district, and school, level III and above percentages for FCAT 2.0 Math sixth-grade
School District State
![Page 14: Douglas S Bagg II Week 5](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070323/559b63be1a28ab0a258b4636/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
71
75
74
73
70
74
74
73
70
68
77
79
76
72
58
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
2008 – 2009
2009 – 2010
2010 – 2011
2011 – 2012
2012 – 2013
Comparing state, district, and school, level III and above percentages for FCAT 2.0 Math Seventh grade
School District State
![Page 15: Douglas S Bagg II Week 5](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070323/559b63be1a28ab0a258b4636/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
61
62
63
65
70
61
62
59
60
72
62
66
67
68
68
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
2008 – 2009
2009 – 2010
2010 – 2011
2011 – 2012
2012 – 2013
Comparing state, district, and school, level III and above percentages for FCAT 2.0 Math Eighth grade
School District State
![Page 16: Douglas S Bagg II Week 5](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070323/559b63be1a28ab0a258b4636/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Things to improve Reading
• Sixth grade reading is 19% below the state average and 15% below the district average.
• Sixth grade math is 11% below the state average and 7% below the district average.
• Seventh grade reading is 17% below the state average and 13% below the district average.
• Seventh grade math is 12% below the state average and 10% below the district average.
![Page 17: Douglas S Bagg II Week 5](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070323/559b63be1a28ab0a258b4636/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Things to cheer about!!!!!
• Our eighth grade math and reading scores are both within 2% of state and district averages with ego eighth-grade team!
![Page 18: Douglas S Bagg II Week 5](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070323/559b63be1a28ab0a258b4636/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
How do we improve?
• Teacher in-service trainings. With an emphasis on common core standards, best teaching practices, and data analysis for optimal teaching success.
• Cooperative teaching, teambuilding, team planning.
• Peer tutoring and reimplementation of afterschool programs to help improve our students academic success.
![Page 19: Douglas S Bagg II Week 5](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070323/559b63be1a28ab0a258b4636/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
References:
https://app1.fldoe.org/Reading_Plans/Narrative/CompleteReport1213.aspx?DID=12
http://www.flbsi.org
http://schoolgrades.fldoe.org/default.asp?report=AYP
Florida's differentiated accountability program 2012 – 2013 improvement plan: Fort White elementary school: district
Columbia