Download - Draft in progress | June 2015. 2 2 3 3 A partnership of Bexley, Bromley, Greenwich, Lambeth, Lewisham and Southwark Clinical Commissioning Groups and

Draft in progress |

Our Healthier South East London Strategy

June 2015

2

Introduction and background

Clinical Leadership Care Models

Affordability Challenge for the System

Impact of the Care models: Finance and Activity

Summary and next steps

2

3

3






A partnership of Bexley, Bromley, Greenwich, Lambeth, Lewisham and Southwark Clinical Commissioning Groups and NHS England

4Draft in progress |

• Co-led strategy with SEL CCGs and NHS England (London)

• Working in partnership with local authorities, local providers of care and other partners

• Six priorities for improvement. These are referred to as Clinical Leadership Groups (CLGs) and focus on:

—Community based care

—Planned care

—Urgent and emergency care

—Maternity

—Children and young people

—Cancer

Introduction to the Our Healthier South East London Strategy and the approach taken to developing the strategy

Clinical Leadership Groups

Majority of strategy has been designed through clinical leadership groups:

• Formed from clinicians, commissioners, social care leads and other experts

• Include Healthwatch representatives and other patient and public voices

• Each CLG has developed a number of interventions and assessed the impacts of these

• Impacts include improved quality, better and less variable outcomes. value for money and sustainability



How have we managed the development of the strategy?

The Governance of the programme consists of 5 core groups:

• Clinical Commissioning Board, a senior joint forum for strategic direction and decision making

• South East London Partnership Group, a collaborative forum for partnership working

• Clinical Executive Group, a clinical forum to guide design work –

• Implementation Executive Group is the Delivery focused forum to manage design and implementation activities

• Public and Patient Advisory Group is a collective forum for the patients to contribute to shaping the strategy’s content

These groups are accountable to the clinical Strategy Committee and the CCG Governing Bodies



We have a shared understanding of the challenges facing south east London. These are outlined in our Case for Change.

Our health outcomes in south east London are not as good as they should be:• Too many people live with preventable ill health or die too early

• The outcomes from care in our health services vary significantly and high quality care is not available all the time

• We don’t treat people early enough to have the best results

• People’s experience of care is very variable and can be much better

• Patients tell us that their care is not joined up between different services

• The money to pay for the NHS is limited and need is continually increasing

• Every one of us pays for the NHS and we have a responsibility to spend this money well

Why are we developing the strategy?



Our collective vision for the south east London:

In south east London we spend £2.3billion in the NHS. Over the next five years we aim to achieve much better outcomes than we do now by:

• Supporting people to be more in control of their health and have a greater say in their own care

• Helping people to live independently and know what to do when things go wrong

• Helping communities to support one another

• Making sure primary care services are consistently excellent and with an increased focus on prevention

• Reducing variation in healthcare outcomes and addressing inequalities by raising the standards in our health services to match the best

• Developing joined up care so that people receive the support they need when they need it

• Delivering services that meet the same high quality standards whenever and wherever care is provided

• Spending our money wisely, to deliver better outcomes and avoid waste

What are we trying to achieve?

A partnership of Bexley, Bromley, Greenwich, Lambeth, Lewisham and Southwark Clinical Commissioning Groups and NHS England 8Draft in progress |

The approach to stakeholder engagement for the strategy

• The strategy has been focused around communicating and working in partnership with our stakeholders

• The strategy is clinically-led and developed, with over 300 clinicians, nurses, allied health professionals, social care staff, commissioners and others developing ideas through the six Clinical Leadership Groups

• These Clinical Leadership Groups also include Patient and Public Voices and Healthwatch representatives

• Additional work on the strategy has been built on, and compliments, existing local borough-level work

• A series of deliberative events were held in June 2014, December 2014 and February 2015

• Engagement and communication is led by Clinical Commissioning Groups via the Communications and Engagement Steering Group which has met at least monthly since May 2014

• Engagement at local level and through local channels is on-going

9

9








The strategy proposes a number of models of care within our six priority areas

Community Based Care delivered though Local Care Networks• Transformation foundation of the strategy

by supporting people to live healthier lives in their communities

• Place people at the centre of care• Local Care Networks will deliver

Community Based Care to local populations

Maternity:• Prevention & targeted wellness

programmes through LCNs• Assessment pre 10 weeks and

assignment to appropriate midwife team• Easy access to acute assessment clinic• birthing units• London Quality Standards• Better co-ordination through postnatal

and neonatal phases• Smooth handover to LCN

Children and Young People:• Primary prevention and wellness• Children’s integrated community teams• Extended GP hours• Short stay paediatric units• Planned care pathways• Support transition to adult services

Urgent and emergency• Enhanced access to unscheduled care

capacity and capability out of hospital• Specialist advice and referral• Improved 11 capability and LAS onward

referral• Enhanced single ‘front door’ to

Emergency Dept• Interface with mental health services

Cancer• Primary prevention and early detection

through LCNs• Networked centres of excellence• Support for people living with and

beyond cancer• End of life care through LCNs

Planned Care:• Standardisation: reducing variation

across the pathway from referral practice to discharge

• Diagnostics: enhancing GP patient management; GP rapid access; evidence-based standardised pathways; shared results & integrated IT

• Elective care centres• Pathway review

These models are interlinked and have a number of independencies

11


Draft in progress |

• Primary and community care (defined in its broadest sense) will be provided at scale by 24 local care networks • A local care network will involve primary, community and social care colleagues working together and drawing on others

from across the health, social care and the voluntary sector to provide proactive patient centered care• Services will be delivered in ways that respond to the varied needs and characteristics of our communities

Primary care working within LCN’s

GP Units & Community services GP Networks

Enablers supporting the transformation The Local Care Networks are the super enabler for integration of services

IM&T, Commissioning Framework, Workforce, Estates

The transformation we are undertaking



Community Based Care delivered by Local Care Networks is the foundation of the integrated whole system model that has been developed for south east London. This diagram provides an overview of the whole system model, incorporating initiatives from all 6 Clinical Leadership Groups.

Our integrated whole system model



• A framework is being developed to help us monitor the successful delivery of the strategy

• A range of outcomes have been identified

• These have been developed by working with out partners

• Further work is taking place to define the best-fit indicators and develop a baseline position

Eight outcomes have been identified• Preventing people from dying prematurely and can

live longer and healthier lives• Reducing differences in life expectancy and healthy

life expectancy between communities• People are independent, in control of their health,

and able to access personalised care to suit their needs

• Health and care services enable people to live a good quality of life with their long term condition

• Treatment is effective and delivers the best results for patients and service users

• Delivering the right care, at right place, at the right time along the whole cycle of care

• Commitment to people having a positive experience of care

• Caring for people in a safe environment and protecting them from avoidable harm

Approach to identifying the outcomes the strategy aims to achieve

Draft in progress |14








Scale of the affordability challenge• The costs of providing care are rising much

faster than inflation because the NHS is now treating more people with more complex conditions than ever before and the costs of care often grow faster than consumer inflation

• The NHS Five Year Forward View outlines a £30 billion financial challenge nationally by 2020/21

• In the absence of action, the scale of the affordability challenge in SEL is forecast to grow to over £1 billion by 2019/20

• The affordability challenge can be broken down into component parts, including:

• The elements that would traditionally sit as QIPPs and CIPs and the overlap between these.

• Differences between planning assumptions that lead to a further challenge.

Draft in progress | 16








• The benefits from the programme can be combined with savings within individual organisations to close a substantial amount of the £1.1 billion

• The benefits shown are as follows:

1.Programme central case (gross benefit)

2.Provider efficiencies at 2.5%

• Savings are presented gross of investment requirements (which total £90 million in the programme central case). Expected that these investment requirements will, at least in part, be satisfied through additional funding requested through the Five Year Forward View

• The resultant position is a £266 million affordability challenge for the South East London health care economy

Closing the affordability challenge

NB: Profiling of benefits shown above may significantly change as implementation plans are developed.



Initial estimate of acute bed requirement

• Using historical NHS bed occupancy data and our projections able to estimated the bed gaps/increases in SEL

• Modelled the impact of the strategy on overnight bed days to be a net reduction of 140,000 and a net increase in day case bed days of 25,000.

• This only relates to acute beds and we would expect a proportion of this activity to be provided within community beds.

• Also note that the ‘do nothing’ position does not reflect any potential reductions associated with QIPP delivery post 2014/15 plans or Better Care Fund related non-elective admission reductions.

19

19








• The next stage is to implement the models in the strategy. For most interventions implementation planning can commence immediately.

• There are some interventions where care model delivery options need to be considered. These interventions will have to undergo a robust options appraisal process.

Options appraisal process

• This approach aims to identify the best way or way(s) of delivering the overarching strategy and realise its full benefits.

• Filters potential options for how the system can be implemented and is designed to identify options that are recommended for further work.

• Proposed that the filtering of options will occur through two gateways of assessment against criteria; hurdle criteria and evaluation criteria. The criteria against which the options will be assessed will be agreed before commencing the appraisal.

• Although some interventions do not in their own right require a detailed options appraisal (those that start implementation planning), the result of implementing those interventions could impact on the appraisal of other interventions because they will lead to shifts in settings of care and volumes of activity.

• As a result, it is important to consider the scope of a detailed options appraisal and how to account for whole system changes within the appraisal of individual interventions.

Delivering the strategy and next steps



Options for appraisal methodology

Finance and activity baseline

Future demand and funding envelope

Current health outcomes

Case for Change

Agreed scale of affordability

challenge

Agreed whole system

outcomes

Proposed care models and

interventions

Activity shifts identified through a triangulation

process using benchmarking, academic

evidence and clinical judgement

Model the interventions

Split interventions by implementation or options appraisal

Implementation planning

Estate and service

baselineApply hurdle criteria Long List

Apply evaluation criteria

Short List

Options appraisal

Agree hurdle and evaluation

criteria

Evaluation Criteria: These will be used to develop a short list of options. They will be used to assess the options in terms of

impact and feasibility, helping to identify realistic options and

those with potentially the best outcomes.

Hurdle Criteria: Tests that options either pass or fail. They provide a sense check of the full

list of options, identifying options that are feasible.

CLG consideration of options for delivery

leading to agreed care models and

interventions

Define scope

22


Programme plan



There are several challenges with the current timeline to be ready to consult on options – if required - by December 2015.

• Approvals and revisions

• Detailed review of London Quality Standards and provider planning assumptions for delivering them

• Provider readiness, challenges and alignment with the commissioning strategy and implementation plans

• Estates baseline and assumptions

• Sufficient engagement and testing of proposals

• NHS England assurance process

Risks of not meeting the December timeline

• Extended period of uncertainty for providers which could increase pressures and delivery of their plans

• Moves any consultation (if required) out by 6 months to June 2016 and therefore some of the benefits will be realized later

• Risk in pausing the process for “Mayoral Purdah” as the shortlist of options will have been agreed

Key timeline challenges and risks

Download - Draft in progress | June 2015. 2 2 3 3 A partnership of Bexley, Bromley, Greenwich, Lambeth, Lewisham and Southwark Clinical Commissioning Groups and

Top Related