Download - Econ 350 Chapter07
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
1/66
1
Chapter 7: Cost Benefit Analysis
The best way to evaluate a governmentpolicy is through the social welfarefunction W=f(U1, U2)
BUT, this function is difficult to accuratelycalculate.
A more pract icalway to evaluate publicexpenditure is through COST-BENEFIT
ANALYSIS.
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
2/66
Chapter 7: Cost-Benefit Analysis
Present Value Calculations and Alternatives
Public Sector Discount Rate
Calculating Public Costs and Benefits
Cost-Benefit Analysis Errors
Distribution
Uncertainty
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
3/66
Math- Compound Interest
Investment: $100Interest rate: 2%
Year Calc. Amount
1 100 100.00
2 100*1.02 102.00
3 100*1.022 104.04
4 100*1.023 106.12
5 100*1.024 108.24
Derived Formula:
S = P (1+r)t
S = value after t yearsP = principle amount
r = interest rate
t = years
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
4/66
Compound Interest ExampleThe City loans $2 million to a local sports
team, to be paid back in 10 years at 3%interest. How much will the City get?
S = P (1+r)t
S = $2 million (1+0.03)10
S = $2.69 million
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
5/66
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
6/66
Present Value Example
If the City wins their bid for the Video GamesOlympics (VGO) in 5 years, they will gain$10 billion in economic activity. What is thepresent value of that gain if interest ratesare 4%?
PV = S/[(1+r)t]
PV = $10 billion/[(1+0.04)5]
PV = $8.22 billion
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
7/66
TheoryDiscount RateSince the future value is discounted
according to the interest rate r, ris oftenreferred to as the DISCOUNT RATE.
Similarly, (1+r)tis often referred to as theDISCOUNT FACTOR
This PV formula changes if a stream of incomeoccurs:
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
8/66
Math - Present Value of a streamIf an investment today yields future returns of
Rt, where t is the year of the return, thenthe present value becomes:
TT
o
r
R
r
R
r
RRPV
)1(...
)1()1( 221
Note that failing to use present values to
discount future benefits can overestimatethe value of a project.
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
9/66
Theory - InflationTypically, all prices in an economy change
(typically increase) with inflation.A $100 DVD player today with 3% inflation
will cost $103 next year. A $50,000 salary
tied to inflation will be $50,150 next year.
NOMINAL VARIABLES are the stickerprice variables, the variables/prices actuallyfaced in that year. (ie: $103 DVD player)
REAL VARIABLESare variables afterinflation has been factored out (ie: $100DVD player)
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
10/66
Inflation RuleWhen doing financial calculations, the general
rule is thatALL VARIABLES MUST BE IN NOMINAL TERMS
OR ALL VARIABLES MUST BE IN REAL TERMS.
-Therefore if future revenues/costs are in nominalterms, simply use the going interest rate r
-If future revenues/costs are in REAL terms, the
nominal interest rate must be converted intothe real interest rate through:
inflationnomrealrr
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
11/66
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
12/66
Theory - Present Value Criteria
A firm will undertake projects based on thefollowing:
1) A firm will only undertake projects whosePV is positive
2) If given a choice between many mutually
exclusive projects, it will chose the one withthe highest PV
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
13/66
Private Firm EvaluationNote that r should represent a firms accurate
opportunity cost of funds
-a high r favors projects with a quick return
(therefore an incorrectly high r discriminatesagainst long projects)
-a low r allows for project with a longer return
(therefore an incorrectly low r discriminatesagainst short projects)
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
14/66
Math - Benefit-Cost Ratio-One limited way to evaluate projects is using
a cost benefit ratio-Given a present value of costs and benefits:
T
X
T
XX
XX
r
C
r
C
r
C
CC )1(...)1()1(2
210
-The BEFEFIT-COST ratio is B/C
T
X
T
XX
XX
r
B
r
B
r
BBB
)1(
...
)1()1( 2
210
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
15/66
Benefit-Cost Ratio
-A project can be undertaken if B/C>1
-This implies that B-C>0, similar to the presentvalue calculation considered earlier
-The benefit-cost ratio ispoorfor comparingbetween projects, as it doesnt considerthe amount of PV:
-$3 net PV could have a B/C value of 1.7while $2,000,000 net PV could have a B/C
value of only 1.1
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
16/66
16
Theory - Pub l ic Secto r Discount Rate
In the private secto r, the discount rate, r, is
the opportunity cost of funds
-ie: the highest return on another
investment or through the bankForpubl ic pro jects, the public sectordiscount rate is harder to calculate
-Is the project funding through reducing:
1) Private investment or
2) Private consumption
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
17/66
17
1) Private Inves tment Fund ing
Assume that funding a public projectdecreases private investment.
Ie: A new road costs $10,000, but theprivate secto rwould have used that$10,000 to make $2,000 20% return.
In this case the public sector discount rateis the private sectors before-tax return.
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
18/66
18
2) Pr ivate Consumpt ion Funding
Assume that funding a public projectdecreases private consumption.
Ie: If the private sector consumes $10,000,that could have made 20% return, or$2,000. If tax is 50%, they are effectively
giving up $1,000 or 10% return.
In this case the public sector discount rateis the private sectors after-tax return.
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
19/66
19
Pub l ic Secto r Discoun t Rate Dif f icu l ty
Typically, government funding decreasesbothprivate consumption and privateinvestment.
Ie: If $10,000 funding decreasedconsumption and investment by $5,000each, r = (20%)/2+(10%)/2=15%
-But it is hard to calculate impact onconsumption and investment, and thisimpact changes with each tax
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
20/66
20
Theory - Soc ial Discount Rate
Some argue that a SOCIAL RATE OF
DISCOUNT is more appropriate, representingthe value SOCIETYplaces on decreasedconsumption.
SOCIAL DISCOUNT RATE is lessthan marketrate of return for 3 reasons:
1) Concern for future generations2) Paternalism
3) Market Inefficiency
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
21/66
21
1) Concern for Futu re Generat ions
One may argue that the private sector has a high
discount rate, heavily discounting benefits tofuture generations
-Therefore the social discount rate should be
lower to take the future into accountBUT
-The government is not fully omniscient and
benevolent towards future generations-Plus projects with long-term benefits should have
long-term profits, expressed in the rate of
return
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
22/66
22
2) Paternalism
Even if people are selfish, they may not be far-
sighted enough to take the future into account(Ill never get sick I dont need to save)
-The government would use the discount rate
people would use if they knew better-the government is paternalistic forcing
decreased consumption now in order to save
for the futureBUT
Should public preference be forced upon people?
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
23/66
23
3) Market Ineff iciency
Often private investment results in posi t ive
externali t ies.-These positive externalities areUNDERPROVIDED
-A lower social discount rate can correct thisinefficiency
BUT
-How big is this externality?
-Would a subsidy make more sense (chapter 5)
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
24/66
24
Publ ic Discount Rate Conc lusion
-The arguments for a social discount rate instead
of a market discount rate still fail to provide fora specific discount rate
-Typical discount rates fall between the before-tax
and after-tax private sector rates of return-The Treasury Board Secretariat (1976)
recommended the use of a social discount
rate of 10 per cent, and of 5 and 15 percentforsensi t iv i ty analysis
-If PV is positive with all these rates, a good
argument exists for doing the project
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
25/66
25
Theory - Valuing Publ ic Benef its and Costs
Private benefi tsand costsare easy to
calculaterevenueand expendi tures.Public benefits and costs are harder to calculate
since SOCIAL costs and benefits may not be
reflected in market prices.Some approaches and considerations are:
1) Market Prices (SMC)
2) Shadow/Adjusted Market Prices (SMC)3) Consumer/Producer Surplus (SMB)
4) Inferences from Economic Behavior
5) Valuing Intangibles
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
26/66
26
1) Market Prices
If the First Fundamental Theorem o f Welfare
Economicsholds, then-P=SMC; we have Pareto Efficiency
-In this case market prices can be used for
project valuationEven if the Theorem fai ls, market prices are
often used because:
1) Market prices are simple and straightforward2) Other measures are:
a) Complicated and questionable
b) Time consuming and costly to calculate
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
27/66
27
2) Ad jus ted Market Prices
The SHADOW PRICEof a commodity is its
underlying social marginal cost in an imperfectmarket
SHADOW PRICErelates to MARKET PRICE
depending on how the market reacts togovernment intervention.
Ie: a) Monopoly
b) Taxes
c) Unemployment
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
28/66
28
2a) Monopoly and Shadow Price
In a monopo ly, P>MC
i) If use of a monopoly input increases itsproduction by the full amount,MC = SHADOW PRICE
ii) If the project consumes inputs that aretaken directly from the private consumer,
PMonopoly = SHADOW PRICEiii) If production is increased somewhat,
PMonopoly < SHADOW PRICE < MC
wei hted avera e
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
29/66
29
2b) Tax and Shadow Price
Taxes fo rce Pconsumer>Pproducer
i) If production of the fully expands,Pproducer= SHADOW PRICE
ii) If the project consumes inputs that aretaken directly from the private consumer,Pconsumer= SHADOW PRICE
iii) If production increases somewhat,Pproducer< SHADOW PRICE < Pconsumer
(weighted average)
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
30/66
30
2c) Unemployment and Shadow Price
Emp loyment in government projects can
come from other jobs o r the unemp loyed
i) If a worker is hired away from another job,WagePrivate Sector= SHADOW PRICE
ii) If the worker doesnt leave another job, thingsare more complicated:
-is the worker taking someone elses job?
WagePrivate Sector= SHADOW PRICE-would the worker have found a job?
-what is the workers opportunity cost of
leisure?
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
31/66
31
2c) Unemployment and Shadow Price
-Forcasting future employment is difficult
-Fully understanding unemployment is difficult (in2011 Alberta had both high vacancies andhigher unemployment due to imperfect job
matches)
-Without a major recession, it is assumed that
WagePrivate Sector= SHADOW PRICE
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
32/66
32
3) Consumer/Producer Surp lus
Typically, private firms have little effect on the
price of a commodity in the marketThe government, however, can have a huge
impact on the price of a commodity in a
market-How should the project be valued?
-Pre-project prices?
-Post-project prices?
-Somewhere in between?
-A good alternative is to calculate change inroducer and consumer sur lus
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
33/66
Consumer
Surplus
33
Consumer Surplus
D
Q*
P*
Equilibrium
Or marketPrice
Q
P
Originally, consumer surplus is calculated as the area
below demand and above equilibrium price
S
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
34/66
Consumer
Surplus
34
Consumer Surplus
D
Q*
P*
Q
P
If a government policy increases supply, consumer surplus
also increases.
SS
Q
P
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
35/66
Producer
Surplus
35
Producer Surplus
D
Q*
P*
Equilibrium
Or marketPrice
Q
P
Originally, producer surplus is calculated as the area above
supply and below equilibrium price
S
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
36/66
Producer
Surplus
36
Producer Surplus
D
Q*
P*
Q
P
If a government policy increases supply, producer surplus
also changes (depending on who is producing the good).
SS
Q
P
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
37/66
37
Old Surplus
D
Q*
P*
Q
P
SS
Q
P
Consumer
Surplus
Producer
Surplus
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
38/66
Producer
Surplus
38
New Surplus
D
Q*
P*
Q
P
SS
Q
P
Consumer
Surplus
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
39/66
39
Gained Surplus
D
Q*
P*
Q
P
SS
Q
P
Note that since producer surplus is lost, businesses are hurt,
possibly having negative consequences (unemployment?)
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
40/66
40
4) Inferences from Econom ic Behavior
If no market exists for a commodity, other
strategies must be used to estimatecosts or benefits such as:
a) The value of time
b) The value of life
i) Lost earnings
ii) Probability of Death
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
41/66
41
4a) The Value Of Time
Often public projects save time, or
(temporarily or permanently) cost time:
ie: Edmonton LRT saves time compared to the
busie: Edmonton bridge construction slows traffic
until its done; closing of Keillor Road
increases travel time
And time is money
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
42/66
42
4a) The Value Of Time
The theory of leisure-income choice states that
people will work up until the point where theirwage is equal to their value of one extra hourof leisure.
If AFTER-TAX WAGE > Leisure value, theperson will work
If AFTER-TAX WAGE < Leisure value, theperson will relax
Therefore one could value time saved as the
AFTER-TAX WAGE RATE.
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
43/66
43
4a) The Value Of Time
BUT:
1) Some people cant choose how many hoursthey work (ie: as involuntary unemployment)
2) Not all time away from a job is equal
-ie: someone who likes the bus may have alower opportunity cost of time
-ie: someone who hates the morning commute
may have a higher opportunity cost of time
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
44/66
44
4a) The Value Of Time
Alternately, one could compare the cost of slow
and fast travelie: (Cost of a taxi)-(Cost of the bus) = value of
time saved by using a taxi
BUTOther things affect choice of travel (fear of taxis,
income, environmental concerns)
Typically, travelling time cost is estimated atabout 50% of before-tax wage rate
(Small, 1992)
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
45/66
45
4b) The Value Of L ife
L ife is p riceless
But
Resources ($) are lim ited
Therefore
Life has a do l lar value attached
A community hospital has $1 million in funding.Does it spend it on an MRI to catch obscurediseases and save 4 young adult lives, or onflu clinics to save 10 elderly lives?
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
46/66
46
4b) The Value Of L ife Question
Approximately 200 people die of the flesh-eating
disease (Necrotizing Fasciitis) each year.Assume that if all the resources spent on theinternet were redirected to this disease
(internet would shut down), these deathswould be prevented.
Is it worth it?What if only youtube shut down?
Itunes?
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
47/66
47
4b) The Value Of L ife
Unfo rtunately, as an aggregate society we
need to quanti fy th e value of l i fe.
Two methods o f assign ing f in i te value to
human l i fe are:
i) Lost Earnings
ii) Probability of Death
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
48/66
48
4b i) Los t Earn ings
Law courts often consider the present value of a
persons lifelong earnings when assigningcompensation to relatives of fatal accidents.
This is one way to estimate the value of life
BUTIt assigns a value (benefit) of ZERO to the old
and retired.
Since everyone in society carries a cost, costbenefit analysis would execute the old and
retired. This is unacceptable.
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
49/66
49
4bi i) Probab i l i ty o f Death
A better value of life is determined through
varying the probability of death. (As mostprojects affect the probability of death; theydont guarantee avoiding death forever).
People often accept a probability of death to savetime or make money in their everyday lives(driving without snow tires, driving a small car,
taking a dangerous job).
The change in probability of death and money
value can be used to calculate value of life.
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
50/66
50
4bi i) Probab i l i ty o f Death
Studies have used this device to put the value of
a life between $4 million US and $10 million US(Viscusi, 2006)
-This is a great range, but still allows reasonableprojects (ie: safety rails) and argues againstunreasonable projects (ie: Asbestos removal:$100 million per life saved)
-This approach is still controversal. A new cancertreatment reducing probability of death by0.01% takes on new meaning if you need the
treatment.
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
51/66
51
5) Valuing In tang ibles
Some costs and benef i ts seem impossib le to
value(ie: pride at winning Olympics)3 issues arise from intangibles:
a) Intangibles can subvert the entire cost-benefit
exercise.b) Cost-benefit analysis can force planners to put
a limit on the value of intangibles
c) Even if intangibles cant be measured,alternative measures be examined to find thecheapest possible
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
52/66
52
5a) Intang ibles can ru in everyth ing
-if you complain or believe that an intangible costor benefit is big enough, you can approve ordeny many projects
ie: Losing the Oilers would be unbearable, we
should build them a new arena!
The piece of mind is worth it, buy thewarrantee!
PS3 - $300. Giving your boyfriend the best
birthday gift everpriceless.
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
53/66
53
5b) In tang ible Value L im it
Decisions can reveal the value of an intangible:
Ie: If, for the Oilers Arena,(Cost-Benefits)=$50 million, and the cityDOES build the arena, the Oilers are worth at
least $50 millionIe: If the cost of a laptop is $1000, with a $200
warrantee, and the laptop failure rate is 5%,
(Cost-Benefits)=$200-$50=$150, andsomeone DOESNT buy the warrantee, laptop
peace of mind is worth less than $150
5c) Cheapest Method to ach ieve
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
54/66
54
5c) Cheapest Method to ach ieve
Intangibles
Cos t-effect iveness analys iscan be used tochosean option to achieve a benefit that cantbe measured.
ie: If you cant put a value on health, you dont
need a gym membership ($600/year), when
you can walk or run outside or at a mall($0/year).
Th C B fi A l i E
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
55/66
55
Theory - Cos t-Benef i t Analys is Errors
Weve already discussed a variety of issues with
cost-benefit analysis.Tresch (2002) noted the following common errors
in cost-benefit analysis:
1) The Chain-Reaction Game
2) The Labour Game
3) The Double-Counting Game
1) Th Ch i R ti G
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
56/66
56
1) The Chain-Reaction Game
Often proposals consider SECONDARY profits
arising from their benefits.ie: A downtown arena produces $1 million profit
itself and increases local business profit by
$4 millionBUT, if you considersecondary benefi ts, one
must also considersecondary COSTS
ie: Moving the arena from the Northeast wouldhurt Northeastern businesses by $X million.
Often secondary benefits are simply transfers
across individuals.
2) Th L b G
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
57/66
57
2) The Labour Game
Often a project calls creating employment a
benefit.
BUT wage rates are a COST.
As mentioned earlier, for the truly involuntaryunemployed, social cost is less than wage.
3) Th D b l C t i G
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
58/66
58
3) The Doub le-Count ing Game
One cant count the benefit of two mutual ly
exclus iveuses of a commodity (ie: sellingand farming on farmland)
ie: If the government provides housing for lowincome families, the benefit is either:
1) Housing low income families
Or2) Selling the house on the market
Not both.
Th Th P b l f Di t ib t i
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
59/66
59
Theory - The Prob lem of Distr ibut ion
In PRIVATE projects, distribution is irrelevant
-if the present value is positive, it is assumedthat the winners COULD compensate thelosers
-The POTENTIAL PARETOIMPROVEMENT CRITERION
-The HICKS-KALDOR CRITERION
-Public projects can be based on thisPOTENTIAL gain in social welfare
-Some can endure cost as long as others
gain more benefits
Th Add d P b l f Di t ib t i
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
60/66
60
The Added Prob lem of Distr ibu t ion
ON TOP of the cost-benefit calculation, one could
also be concerned about DISTRIBUTION.
We can AVOID this problem by assuming that:
1) The government can costlessly transferbetween winners and losers
2) This transfer is nondistortionary
This assumption is difficult to justify
Th Add d P b l f Di t ib t i
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
61/66
61
The Added Prob lem of Distr ibu t ion
We can ADDRESS this problem by assuming that
certain members of society are especiallydeserving
-A dollar benefit to these members is greater
than a dollar benefit to othersBUT:
1) Who is more deserving (poor, disabled, hard
workers, women, men)?2) How much more than a dollar ($1.10, $2)?
POLITICS now complicates the issue.
Th Th P b l f U t i t
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
62/66
62
Theory The Prob lem of Uncertainty
Often the costs and benefits of a project are
UNCERTAIN.(ie: Vaccines MAY prevent the swine flu, orthey may go to people who were at no risk.)
Costs and Benefits must therefore be convertedto CERTAINTY EQUIVALENTS the amount
of certain cost or benefit that a person wouldtrade for an uncertain cost or benefit scheme.
U t i t E l 1
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
63/66
63
Uncertainty Example 1
Many game shows give an opportunity for the
winner to keep their winning or RISK IT ALL(ie: pick whats in case #2).
Assume a suitcase can hold $0 with a probability
of 0.5 and $20,000 with a probability of 0.5E($)=$0(0.5)+$20,000(0.5)=$10,000
If a contestant would take the chance UNTIL hiswinnings increased to $4,000, that would behis CERTAINTY EQUIVALENT.
Uncertainty Example 2
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
64/66
64
Uncertainty Example 2
Jonah wants a laptop. He can buy a Whale
laptop worth $1000 or a Ninva laptop worth$600 with a 4-year warrantee. (Same price)
From Gartner (2006) we can infer a 25% failurerate on laptops over 4 years.
Ninva: Benefit=$600
Whale: Benefit=$1000(0.75)+0(0.25)=$750
If Jonah is indifferent between laptops, he has a
CERTAINTY EQUIVALENT of $600
Chapter 7 Summary
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
65/66
65
Chapter 7 Summary
Since costs and benefits occur over time, their
PRESENT VALUE must be calculated Typically, the public sector discount rate (r) is:
before tax return>r>after-tax return
Alternatively, social discount rates argue forless than public sector discount rates
Costs and benefits can be measured at
market prices or shadow prices Labour costs are calculated considering
unemployment and chance to remain
unemployed
Chapter 7 Summary
-
7/28/2019 Econ 350 Chapter07
66/66
Chapter 7 Summary Consumer and Producer surplus can be
effective ways of measuring costs and benefits The prices of some nonmarket commodities
(time, life) have to be inferred from observing
behavior Some intangible benefits cannot be measured
In cost benefit analysis, never: count
secondary benefits without secondary costs,view wages as a benefit, or double-count
Distributional issues and uncertainty further